Comparing the Antibacterial Effect of Sodium Hypochlorite and Graphene Oxide on to the Disinfection of Enterococcus Faecalis-Contaminated Gutta-Percha Cones
Authors
Dept. of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, P.S.M College of Dental Science & Research, Kerala, India (India)
Dept. of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, P.S.M College of Dental Science & Research, Kerala, India (India)
Dept. of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, P.S.M College of Dental Science & Research, Kerala, India (India)
Dept. of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, P.S.M College of Dental Science & Research, Kerala, India (India)
Dept. of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, P.S.M College of Dental Science & Research, Kerala, India (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150800095
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 15/8 | Page No: 1303-1309
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-08-28
Accepted: 2026-09-02
Published: 2026-09-18
Abstract
Chairside disinfection of gutta-percha (GP) cones is routinely performed to minimize the risk of microbial contamination during root canal obturation. In the present study, the effect of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) in comparison with graphene oxide on the disinfection against microorganisms has been investigated. The disinfectants treatment has produced alterations in the surface characteristics of GP cones, which impacted their physical properties. Among the disinfectants used, the lower OD600 value (0.1864) of NaOCl demonstrated its greatest antibacterial activity.
Keywords
sodium hypochlorite; microorganism; microstructure.
Downloads
References
1. Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN. Microbiology of endodontic infections. In: Hargreaves KM, Berman LH, editors. Cohen’s Pathways of the Pulp. 11th ed. St Louis: Elsevier; 2016. p. 559–599. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dental Clinics of North America. 1974;18(2):269–296. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Grossman LI, Oliet S, Del Rio CE. Endodontic Practice. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1988. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Rotstein I, Ingle JI, editors. Ingle’s Endodontics. 7th ed. Hamilton: BC Decker; 2019. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Cohen S, Hargreaves KM, editors. Pathways of the Pulp. 10th ed. St Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Torabinejad M, Walton RE. Endodontics: Principles and Practice. 4th ed. St Louis: Saunders Elsevier; 2009. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Senia ES, Marraro RV, Mitchell JL, Lewis AG, Thomas L. Rapid sterilization of gutta-percha cones with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. Journal of Endodontics. 1975;1(4):136– 140. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Pang NS, Jung IY, Bae KS, Baek SH, Lee WC, Kum KY. Effects of short-term chemical disinfection of gutta-percha cones: Identification of affected microbes and alterations in surface texture and physical properties. Journal of Endodontics. 2007;33(5):594–598. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Nabeshima CK, de Lima Machado ME, Borges Britto ML, Pallotta RC. Effectiveness of different chemical agents for disinfection of gutta-percha cones. Australian Endodontic Journal. 2011;37(3):118–121. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Gurgel-Filho ED, Feitosa JA, Teixeira FB, de Paula RC, Silva JA, Souza-Filho FJ. Chemical and X-ray analyses of five brands of dental gutta-percha cone. International Endodontic Journal. 2003;36(4):302–307 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Stuart CH, Schwartz SA, Beeson TJ, Owatz CB. Enterococcus faecalis: Its role in root canal treatment failure and current concepts in retreatment. Journal of Endodontics. 2006;32(2):93–98. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Love RM. Enterococcus faecalis—A mechanism for its role in endodontic failure. International Endodontic Journal. 2001;34(5):399–405. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN. Present status and future directions: Microbiology of endodontic infections. International Endodontic Journal. 2022;55:512–530 14. Evans M, Davies JK, Sundqvist G, Figdor D. Mechanisms involved in the resistance of Enterococcus faecalis to calcium hydroxide. International Endodontic Journal. 2002;35(3):221–228. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Distel JW, Hatton JF, Gillespie MJ. Biofilm formation in medicated root canals. Journal of Endodontics. 2002;28(10):689–693. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Kayaoglu G, Ørstavik D. Virulence factors of Enterococcus faecalis: Relationship to endodontic disease. Critical Reviews in Oral Biology and Medicine. 2004;15(5):308–320. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Portenier I, Waltimo TM, Haapasalo M. Enterococcus faecalis—The root canal survivor and ‘star’ in post-treatment disease. Endodontic Topics. 2003;6(1):135–159. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Prado M, Gusman H, Gomes BP, Simão RA. Effect of disinfectant solutions on gutta-percha and Resilon cones. Microscopy Research and Technique. 2012;75(6):791–795. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, Vianna ME, Berber VB, Teixeira FB, Souza-Filho FJ. In vitro antimicrobial activity of several concentrations of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate in the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis. International Endodontic Journal. 2001;34(6):424–428. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Mohammadi Z. Sodium hypochlorite in endodontics: An update review. International Dental Journal. 2008;58(6):329–341. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. Journal of Endodontics. 2006;32(5):389–398. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Müller G, Kramer A. Biocompatibility index of antiseptic agents by parallel assessment of antimicrobial activity and cellular cytotoxicity. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2008;61(6):1281–1287. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Nanda SS, Yi DK, Kim K. Study of antibacterial mechanism of graphene oxide using Raman spectroscopy. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:28443. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Liu S, Zeng TH, Hofmann M, Burcombe E, Wei J, Jiang R, et al. Antibacterial activity of graphite, graphite oxide, graphene oxide, and reduced graphene oxide: Membrane and oxidative stress. ACS Nano. 2011;5(9):6971–6980. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Rai M, Yadav A, Gade A. Silver nanoparticles as a new generation of antimicrobials. Biotechnology Advances. 2009;27(1):76–83. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Morones JR, Elechiguerra JL, Camacho A, Holt K, Kouri JB, Ramírez JT, Yacaman MJ. The bactericidal effect of silver nanoparticles. Nanotechnology. 2005;16(10):2346–2353. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Pal S, Tak YK, Song JM. Does the antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles depend on the shape of the nanoparticle? Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2007;73(6):1712–1720. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Kim JS, Kuk E, Yu KN, Kim JH, Park SJ, Lee HJ, et al. Antimicrobial effects of silver nanoparticles. Nanomedicine. 2007;3(1):95–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Hübner NO, Siebert J, Kramer A. Octenidine dihydrochloride, a modern antiseptic for skin, mucous membranes. and wounds. Skin Pharmacology and Physiology. 2010;23(5):244–258. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- A Study to Assess the Impact of a Nurse-Led Educational Intervention on Knowledge Regarding Oral Health Among Primigravida in Selected Hospitals of Navi Mumbai
- Attitude towards Mathematics and Science in Relation to STEM Career Aspirations among Senior Secondary School Students
- AI-Driven Personalized Learning in Educational Systems: A Framework for Adaptive Learning and Decision Support
- Institutionalizing Indigenous Peoples Education in Philippine Basic Education: Development of the Integrated Institutionalization Framework for Indigenous Peoples Education (IIF-IPEd)
- Toward an Integrated Theory of Enterprise Risk Management: A Multi-Theoretical Conceptual Framework