Traditional Authorities in Decentralised Public Administration: Hybrid Governance, Institutional Accountability and Rural Service Delivery in Zimbabwe

Decentralised public administration in rural Zimbabwe depends on effective coordination between customary authorities, elected representatives, and administrative institutions, making the functioning of hybrid governance arrangements directly relevant to public governance, regulation, and law. Existing studies have examined the constitutional recognition of traditional leadership and the broader implementation of devolution, but ward-level evidence on how stakeholders perceive legitimacy, coordination failures, resource asymmetries, and accountability within everyday rural service delivery remains limited. This study aims to examine how chiefs, headmen, and village heads interact with councillors and rural district structures in supporting health, education, water, and infrastructure services in Wards 25--30 of Masvingo South. The empirical material consists of semi-structured interviews conducted between January and March 2026 with 38 purposively selected traditional leaders, councillors, rural district council representatives, extension officers, and community members, with thematic saturation reached before completing the full sample. Interviews lasting 25–40 minutes were conducted in English or Shona, transcribed and translated where necessary, coded inductively and deductively in NVivo 14, and analysed thematically through hybrid governance theory and institutional legitimacy, while member checking with 12 participants and peer debriefing were used to strengthen trustworthiness. The findings show that traditional authorities were perceived to convert culturally embedded legitimacy into community mobilisation, participation, and project ownership in clinic support, school-enrolment activities, borehole siting, infrastructure maintenance, and local dispute mediation. A second pattern concerns a legitimacy–resource mismatch in which customary actors were reported to carry substantial mobilisation and maintenance responsibilities while lacking corresponding fiscal authority, formal decision rights, and material support. A third pattern concerns mandate ambiguity and partisan pressure, which were perceived to generate bypassed procedures, competition over authority, delayed coordination, and weakened accountability between traditional leaders, councillors, and rural district structures. The study contributes to research on decentralised public administration by showing that hybrid governance operates as a negotiated administrative interface rather than a stable institutional settlement, and the findings may inform devolution policy, statutory clarification, inter-institutional coordination, and future comparative research in settings where customary and formal governance systems coexist.

Traditional authorities, Hybrid governance, Accountability.

1. Afrobarometer. (2021). Zimbabwe Round 8 summary of results. [Link] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alexander, J. (2018). The politics of states and chiefs in Zimbabwe. In J. L. Comaroff & J. Comaroff (Eds.), The politics of custom: Chiefship, capital, and the state in contemporary Africa (pp. 134–161). University of Chicago Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bagayoko, N., Hutchful, E., & Luckham, R. (2016). Hybrid security governance in Africa: Rethinking the foundations of security, justice and legitimate public authority. Conflict, Security & Development, 16(1), 1–32. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bazaanah, P., & Mothapo, R. A. (2024). Sustainability of drinking water and sanitation delivery systems in rural communities of the Lepelle Nkumpi Local Municipality, South Africa. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(6), 14223–14255. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Beall, J., & Ngonyama, M. (2009). Indigenous institutions, traditional leaders and elite coalitions for development: The case of Greater Durban, South Africa (Crisis States Working Paper Series No. 2, Working Paper No. 55). Crisis States Research Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science. [Link] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bvirindi, J., & Chikwawawa, C. (2022). Devolving power and decentralising local governance in Zimbabwe: Prospects and impediments. In G. Bucci (Ed.), Innovations in science and technology (Vol. 8, pp. 62–71). Book Publisher International. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Chakunda, V., & Matenga, G. (2026). Interrogating the feasibility and efficacy of devolved regional governments in Zimbabwe. Regional & Federal Studies, 36(1), 1–24. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Chatiza, K., & Makanza, V. (2017). Impacting local democracy: Capacity building of local governments in Zimbabwe (Research Report No. 9). Swedish International Centre for Local Democracy. [Link] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Chigumira, G., Chipumho, E., & Mudzonga, E. (2019). Exploring the key success factors in implementing devolution in Zimbabwe (ZEPARU Discussion Paper). Zimbabwe Economic Policy Analysis and Research Unit. [Link] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Chigwata, T. (2016). The role of traditional leaders in Zimbabwe: Are they still relevant? Law, Democracy & Development, 20, 69–90. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Chigwata, T. C. (2015). Decentralization in Africa and the resilience of traditional authorities: Evaluating Zimbabwe’s track record. Regional & Federal Studies, 25(5), 439–453. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Link] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Dahlberg, M., & Söderberg, C. (2024). Nuancing the spheres of authority of chiefs: State perspectives on hybrid governance. Governance, 37(2), 579–597. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Dziva, C. (2020). The potential and challenges for traditional leadership in combating the COVID-19 pandemic in rural communities of Zimbabwe. African Journal of Governance and Development, 9(2), 510–523. [Link] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Faboye, S. O., Gumbo, T., & Sebola-Samanyanga, K. J. P. (2024). Maintaining water and sanitation service delivery in rural and peri-urban North West Province of South Africa: Governance as social or entrepreneurial responsibility? In Keep on planning for the real world: Climate change calls for nature-based solutions and smart technologies: Proceedings of REAL CORP 2024 (pp. 407–412). CORP—Competence Center of Urban and Regional Planning. [Link] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Hendrickse, R. (2024). Hybrid governance in selected African countries: A conceptual debate and literature review. International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy, 6(4), 361–372. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Honig, L. (2019). Traditional leaders and development in Africa. In Oxford research encyclopedia of politics. Oxford University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hove, J., D’Ambruoso, L., Mabetha, D., van der Merwe, M., Byass, P., Kahn, K., Khosa, S., Witter, S., & Twine, R. (2019). ‘Water is life’: Developing community participation for clean water in rural South Africa. BMJ Global Health, 4(3), Article e001377. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Hutete, C., & Sibanda, M. M. (2022). Water service provision and social equity in a South African rural district municipality. Africa’s Public Service Delivery & Performance Review, 10(1), Article a641. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Jackson, P., & Marquette, H. (2003). The interaction between traditional systems and local government systems in Sub-Saharan Africa. University of Birmingham. [Link] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Logan, C. (2009). Selected chiefs, elected councillors and hybrid democrats: Popular perspectives on the co-existence of democracy and traditional authority. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 47(1), 101–128. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Matsiliza, N. S. (2024). The strategic role of traditional leadership in promoting good governance. Africa’s Public Service Delivery & Performance Review, 12(1), Article a825. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Mavhura, E., & Mushure, S. (2019). Forest and wildlife resource-conservation efforts based on indigenous knowledge: The case of Nharira community in Chikomba district, Zimbabwe. Forest Policy and Economics, 105, 83–90. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Motadi, M. S., & Sikhwari, T. (2024). Understanding hybridity governance in Africa: A theoretical framework for hybrid structures, policies, and practices. International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy, 6(4), 122–135. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Moyo, P., & Ncube, C. (2014). Devolution of power in Zimbabwe’s new constitutional order: Opportunities and potential constraints. Law, Democracy & Development, 18, 289–304. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Musarandega, H., Chingombe, W., & Pillay, R. (2018). Harnessing local traditional authorities as a potential strategy to combat the vagaries of climate change in Zimbabwe. Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 10(1), Article a651. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Ndlovu, T., & van der Waldt, G. (2025). Participatory budgeting in rural councils: The case of Mangwe District Council, Zimbabwe. Africa’s Public Service Delivery & Performance Review, 13(1), Article a899. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Ndoma, S. (2021). Zimbabweans see traditional leaders as influential but want them to stay out of politics (Afrobarometer Dispatch No. 469). Afrobarometer. [Link] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Nyikadzino, T., & Vyas-Doorgapersad, S. (2022a). Decentralisation and central government control: Experiences from the local government reform in Zimbabwe. African Journal of Governance and Development, 11(1.2), 213–232. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Nyikadzino, T., & Vyas-Doorgapersad, S. (2022b). Zimbabwe’s transition to a devolved system of government: Critical factors for success. Africa’s Public Service Delivery & Performance Review, 10(1), Article a604. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Olowu, D., & Wunsch, J. S. (2004). Local governance in Africa: The challenges of democratic decentralization. Lynne Rienner Publishers. [Link] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Link] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Pearson, J. (2024). Reflections on the role of traditional authorities in land governance in 21st-century South Africa (Working Paper No. 1). Public Affairs Research Institute. [Link] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Ray, D. I., & van Rouveroy van Nieuwaal, E. A. B. (1996). The new relevance of traditional authorities in Africa: The conference; major themes; reflections on chieftaincy in Africa; future directions. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 28(37–38), 1–38. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Reno, W. (1995). Corruption and state politics in Sierra Leone. Cambridge University Press. [Link] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Ringson, J. (2020). The role of traditional leadership in supporting orphans and vulnerable children in Zimbabwe: African traditional leadership perspective. Social Work/Maatskaplike Werk, 56(2), 208–220. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Selepe, M. M. (2009). The role of traditional leaders in the promotion of municipal service delivery in South Africa [Doctoral dissertation, University of Pretoria]. UPSpace. [Link] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Shoko, E. (2022). Indigenous conflict management and contemporary water resource governance in rural Zimbabwe. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 17(2), 225–238. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Sibanda, H. M. (1990). Problems of land use planning in the communal areas of Zimbabwe: A case study of Gutu District, Masvingo Province. Applied Geography, 10(2), 135–146. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Suchikova, Y., Tsybuliak, N., Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Nazarovets, S. (2026). GAIDeT (Generative AI Delegation Taxonomy): A taxonomy for humans to delegate tasks to generative artificial intelligence in scientific research and publishing. Accountability in Research, 33(3), Article 2544331. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Ubink, J. M. (2008). Traditional authorities in Africa: Resurgence in an era of democratisation. Leiden University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Link] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Zinyama, T., Kuwa, O., & Manyera, A. (2023). Re-imagining devolution for recapitalisation of local authorities in Zimbabwe: The quest for a better life. Journal of Public Administration and Development Alternatives, 8(2), 1–17. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Study to Assess the Impact of a Nurse-Led Educational Intervention on Knowledge Regarding Oral Health Among Primigravida in Selected Hospitals of Navi Mumbai
• Attitude towards Mathematics and Science in Relation to STEM Career Aspirations among Senior Secondary School Students
• AI-Driven Personalized Learning in Educational Systems: A Framework for Adaptive Learning and Decision Support
• Institutionalizing Indigenous Peoples Education in Philippine Basic Education: Development of the Integrated Institutionalization Framework for Indigenous Peoples Education (IIF-IPEd)
• Toward an Integrated Theory of Enterprise Risk Management: A Multi-Theoretical Conceptual Framework