IJLTEMAS International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering, Management & Applied Science (IJLTEMAS) IJLTEMAS 2278-2540 IJLTEMAS 427 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150900075 Artificial Intelligence Chatgpt Reliance and Cognitive Offloading As Predictors of Critical Thinking in the Workplace: Evidence from Corporate Organizations and Higher Education Institutions Alemar De La Rosa Betito Dr. University of Perpetual Help System DALTA – Las Pinas, Philippines Philippines Rubi Ana Saludario Dr. University of Perpetual Help System DALTA – Las Pinas, Philippines Philippines Emy E. Cruz Dr. Navotas Polytechnic College Philippines John Arwin G. Sanchez. Mr. DepED (Department of Education) Philippines Proncess P. Bautista. Ms. DepED (Department of Education) Philippines Irene B. Bugay Prof. Imelda Elementary School Philippines 15 9 1964 1993 26 09 2026 01 10 2026 14 10 2026 ChatGPT reliance cognitive offloading critical thinking generative artificial intelligence human–AI collaboration workplace cognition cognitive sustainability Abstract

This study examined ChatGPT reliance and cognitive offloading as predictors of critical thinking in the workplace among employees from corporate organizations and higher education institutions. Using a quantitative, non-experimental, cross-sectional predictive-correlational design, the study involved 384 employees and assessed ChatGPT reliance, cognitive offloading, and workplace critical thinking through a structured survey questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, multiple regression, and independent-samples t tests were employed. Findings indicated high levels of ChatGPT reliance (M = 3.18), cognitive offloading (M = 3.01), and critical thinking (M = 3.25). ChatGPT reliance was positively associated with cognitive offloading (r = 0.61, p < 0.001), while ChatGPT reliance (r = −0.29, p < 0.001) and cognitive offloading (r = −0.46, p < 0.001) were negatively associated with critical thinking. Collectively, ChatGPT reliance and cognitive offloading significantly predicted critical thinking, explaining 22.1% of its variance (R² = 0.221), with cognitive offloading (β = −0.37) demonstrating a stronger unique predictive relationship than ChatGPT reliance (β = −0.10). Corporate and higher education employees did not significantly differ in ChatGPT reliance or critical thinking, although corporate employees reported significantly higher cognitive offloading. Based on these findings, the Human–AI Cognitive Sustainability Framework (HAICSF) was developed to promote appropriate ChatGPT reliance, strategic cognitive offloading, human verification, and preservation of higher-order cognitive capabilities in AI-assisted workplaces.

 References Betito, A. D. L. R. (2026). Generative artificial intelligence adoption, critical thinking, and digital research competency as predictors of graduate research quality: Developing an AI-assisted research excellence framework. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, 13(8), 1–18. DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2026.1308000001 Betito, A. D. L. R., Saludario, R. A., Bonanciar, S. A., II, Jimenez, J. M., Mangahas, R., Jr., & Bugay, I. B. (2026). Leadership, artificial intelligence capability, and total quality management as strategic determinants of sustainable operational excellence across industries. International Journal of Special Education, 41(10s), 983–1002. https://internationalsped.com/index.php/ijse/article/view/3765 Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D., & Raymond, L. R. (2025). Generative AI at work. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 140(2), 889–942. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjae044 Gerlich, M. (2025). AI tools in society: Impacts on cognitive offloading and the future of critical thinking. Societies, 15(1), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006 Hong, H., Vate-U-Lan, P., & Viriyavejakul, C. (2025). Cognitive offload instruction with generative AI: A quasi-experimental study on critical thinking gains in English writing. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(7), 325–334. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i7.10072 Jain, P., Shajit, D., Maini, A., Shahin, Y., & Panda, A. (2026). Cognitive offloading, critical thinking and attitudes towards artificial intelligence in the era of ChatGPT: A comparative study of artificial intelligence-assisted and manual task performance in young adults. Cognitive Processing. https DOI: 10.1007/s10339-026-01375-z Lee, H.-P., Sarkar, A., Tankelevitch, L., Drosos, I., Rintel, S., Banks, R., & Wilson, N. (2025). The impact of generative AI on critical thinking: Self-reported reductions in cognitive effort and confidence effects from a survey of knowledge workers. Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–22. DOI: 10.1145/3706598.3713778. Noy, S., & Zhang, W. (2023). Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. Science, 381(6654), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh2586 Retkowsky, J., Hafermalz, E., & Huysman, M. (2024). Managing a ChatGPT-empowered workforce: Understanding its affordances and side effects. Business Horizons, 67(5), 511–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2024.04.009 Tankelevitch, L., Kewenig, V., Simkute, A., Scott, A. E., Sarkar, A., Sellen, A., & Rintel, S. (2024). The metacognitive demands and opportunities of generative AI. In Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Article 680, pp. 1–24). Association for Computing Machinery. DOI: 10.1145/3613904.3642902.