INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue II, February 2025
www.ijltemas.in Page 77
Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism in Africa: The Nigerian
Experince
Njoku, Chinwendu Shedrack, Ikwuoma, Sunday Udochukwu, Olemeforo, Ernest Ifeanyichukwu, Olelewe, Eusebius
Chinedu
Department of Political Science, Kingsley Ozumba Mbadiwe University, Ideato, Imo State Nigeria.
DOI : https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1402009
Received: 09 February 2025; Revised: 20 February 2025; Accepted: 22 February 2025; Published: 10 March 2025
Abstract: Terrorism has become a contemporary issue in Africa and in Nigeria particularly. This paper therefore examined
terrorism and counter-terrorism measures in Africa with emphasis on Nigeria. Methodologically, dada used for this study was
sourced through the qualitative methods of data collection which relied mainly on secondary sources for data collection. This
involved the use of literature materials such as textbooks, journal articles, newspapers, seminar papers (published and
unpublished), etc., as well as the internet. Data gathered was sourced content and descriptive analysis. The study established that
several counter-terrorism measures have been put in place at both national and continental levels to reduce if not eradicate in
totality the spate of terrorism but these measures have not been able to achieve the desired results as terrorism has continued to
thrive. The failure of these measures anchors on government insensitivity and/or lack of political will to address issues of
unemployment, get rich quick syndrome, failed family values and other national questions like power sharing, uneven
development and prebendal politics, proliferation of small arms and light weapons, as well as porous borders. The study
recommended that Africa must establish a Continental Terrorism Management Center (CTMC) at continental level, while
governments at all levels in Nigeria must as a matter of urgency address socio-economic deprivation and the severe wealth
inequality among its people that provides recruitment centers for these terrorist groups.
Keywords: Terrorism, Counter-Terrorism, Violence, Force
I. Introduction
Terrorism in Africa especially Nigeria, has become an increasingly pervasive problem where terrorist groups operate with
alarming frequency. The shift in global terrorism from traditional conflict zones such as the Middle East to Africa has raised
concerns regarding national security and regional stability. Terrorist activities in Africa are not only a direct threat to peace but
also hamper the social and economic development of many nations, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. As Africa's most populous
and economically influential nations, Nigeria has become a prime target for terrorist groups seeking to destabilize the region.
Significantly, the rise of terrorism in Africa is exacerbated by the interconnectedness of global communication networks and the
ease with which terrorist ideologies can spread across borders. The proliferation of extremist ideas, particularly through social
media platforms, has empowered terrorist groups to recruit followers and carry out deadly attacks. In Nigeria, the rapid growth of
groups such as Boko Haram and the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP) exemplifies the transnational nature of modern
terrorism. Additionally, local grievances and regional tensions, such as ethnic conflicts, poverty, and political instability, have
been exploited by these groups to gain support and expand their operations.
In fact, while terrorism was initially more prevalent in North Africa and parts of the Horn of Africa, the scope of terrorist
activities in sub-Saharan Africa has broadened significantly. Countries like Nigeria, Mali, Somalia, and Cameroon have
experienced devastating terrorist attacks that have disrupted their socio-political fabric. Despite efforts by the Nigerian
government and its allies to combat terrorism, the region continues to grapple with the devastating effects of terrorism on
civilians, infrastructure, and governance. This paper explores the nature, causes, and impacts of terrorism in Africa with emphasis
on Nigeria, and also examine the effectiveness of counter-terrorism strategies employed by Nigerian government towards
eliminating the menace of terrorism in its territory.
In 2024, Africa experienced a significant escalation in terrorist activities, with militant Islamist groups intensifying their
operations across various regions. The Sahel emerged as the epicenter of this violence, accounting for over half of all militant
Islamist incidents on the continent (Africa Center for Strategic Studies, 2024). Fatalities in the Sahel nearly tripled since 2020,
reaching approximately 11,000 in 2024 (Financial Times, 2024).
From 2020 to 2024, Nigeria experienced a notable escalation in terrorist activities and violent incidents. According to a report by
Nextier, Nigeria recorded 5,291 violent incidents leading to 20,472 fatalities and injuries during this period (Guardian Nigeria,
2024). The Global Terrorism Index also reported a 34% increase in terrorism-related deaths in 2023, largely due to intensified
conflicts between the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP) and Boko Haram (Business Day Nigeria, 2024).
While projections for 2025 indicate a commitment to enhanced security measures, National Security Adviser Nuhu Ribadu has
emphasized proactive strategies to combat terrorism (Punch Nigeria, 2024). However, the emergence of new threats, including
the Lakurawa terror group and ongoing instability in the Southeast and North Central regions, underscores the need for
continuous vigilance and adaptive strategies (The Nation, 2024).
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue II, February 2025
www.ijltemas.in Page 78
Problem Statement
Terrorism in Nigeria has had devastating effects on the country’s security, economy, and social fabric. The activities of extremist
groups like Boko Haram and the Islamic State in West Africa Province (ISWAP) have led to widespread violence, displacing
millions of people, particularly in the northeastern region. The destruction of infrastructure, including schools, hospitals, and
markets, has hindered economic development and access to basic services. Additionally, frequent terrorist attacks have created an
atmosphere of fear and instability, discouraging both local and foreign investment. The Nigerian government has had to allocate
significant resources to counterterrorism efforts, diverting funds from essential sectors like education and healthcare.
The social impact of terrorism in Nigeria is equally severe, as it has deepened ethnic and religious tensions, particularly in
conflict-prone areas. Many communities have been torn apart, with families losing loved ones and children being abducted or
forced into insurgency groups. The psychological trauma experienced by survivors and displaced persons has long-term
consequences, affecting their mental health and ability to rebuild their lives. Terrorism has also weakened trust between citizens
and the government, as many feel that authorities have failed to provide adequate security. This erosion of trust has fueled local
grievances and, in some cases, led to increased radicalization, perpetuating the cycle of violence. Addressing these challenges
requires a comprehensive approach that includes military action, socioeconomic development, and community-driven
reconciliation efforts.
Statistically, between 2020 and 2024, Nigeria faced significant challenges related to terrorism, resulting in substantial loss of life
and widespread displacement. A report by Nextier indicates that Nigeria experienced over 20,000 deaths due to violent incidents
from 2020 to 2024. (GistReel, 2024). Also, in 2023, The Global Terrorism Index reported a 34% increase in terrorism-related
deaths, totaling 524 fatalities, primarily due to intensified conflicts between the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP) and
Boko Haram (Business Day Nigeria, 2024). Also, The Open Doors International reported that 4,998 Christians were murdered in
Nigeria, highlighting targeted attacks by Islamist groups (New York Post, 2024).
In 2020, Nigeria had approximately 2.7 million internally displaced persons, ranking third highest in Africa (Statista, 2024). In
February 2023, The International Organization for Migration (IOM) identified 2,375,661 IDPs, noting a 3% decrease from July
2022 (DTM IOM, 2023). Also, Reports indicated that the number of IDPs had risen to 3.4 million, exacerbated by ongoing
violence and targeted attacks (New York Post, 2024).
While specific data for 2025 is not yet available, the Nigerian government has pledged to intensify efforts to combat terrorism and
address internal displacement (Punch Nigeria, 2024). However, the emergence of new threats and persistent instability suggest
that challenges related to fatalities and displacement may continue (The Nation, 2024).
Objectives of the Study:
This study is designed to evaluate and/or appraise counter terrorism strategies applied by the Nigerian government to determine
how effective these strategies have been in reducing if not eradicate totally the menace of terrorism in Nigeria.
Significance of the study
The significance of this study is multidimensional as it is crucial in understanding the underlying causes of terrorism, the
motivations of extremist groups, and the effectiveness of counterterrorism strategies implemented by the Nigerian government
and international partners. By analyzing these factors, the study provides critical insights that can help policymakers, security
agencies, and researchers develop more effective and sustainable approaches to combating terrorism.
Simply put, a study on terrorism and counterterrorism in Africa, with a focus on Nigeria, is of immense significance. It provides
essential knowledge for formulating effective policies, enhancing regional cooperation, fostering economic resilience, and
promoting human rights-compliant counterterrorism measures. Given the evolving nature of terrorism, continuous research and
adaptation are necessary to develop holistic strategies that ensure sustainable peace and security in Nigeria and across Africa.
II. Literature Review
Defining Terrorism
Terrorism, as a concept, has been a subject of numerous debates and varying interpretations over time. This might be attributed to
what Ludwikowski (1987) referred to as the problem of “one man’s terrorist is another’s freedom fighter.” While there is no
universally accepted definition of terrorism, it is generally understood as the use of violence or the threat of violence to achieve
political, ideological, or religious objectives. The term "terrorism" evokes fear, anxiety, and panic, as it targets civilians and non-
combatants to create widespread uncertainty and destabilization. Terrorists seek to create a state of terror and insecurity,
ultimately undermining the trust that citizens place in their governments, societal institutions, and communities.
Terrorism, according to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), is the "unlawful use of force or violence against persons or
property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social
objectives." This definition highlights the political and social motives behind terrorist actions, yet it does not fully account for the
broader psychological and emotional toll terrorism inflicts on the population. Terrorism creates a pervasive atmosphere of fear,
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue II, February 2025
www.ijltemas.in Page 79
not only due to the immediate loss of life and destruction but also due to the uncertainty about when and where the next attack
may occur.
The United Nations (1992) defines terrorism as "an anxiety-inspiring method of repeated violent action, employed by (semi-
)clandestine individuals, groups, or state actors for idiosyncratic, criminal, or political reasonsin contrast to assassination,
where the direct targets of terrorism are not the main targets." This definition underscores the element of repeated and persistent
violence and emphasizes that terrorism can be carried out not only by non-state actors but also by state actors in certain instances.
Additionally, the European Union (2002) defines terrorism as "acts intended to seriously intimidate a population, unlawfully
coerce or influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion, or to affect the conduct of a government by mass
destruction, assassination, or kidnapping." This definition underscores the broader social and political aims of terrorism, as well
as the extreme methods used to achieve them.
Furthermore, the U.S. Department of State (2004) defines terrorism as “premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated
against non-combatant targets, usually intended to influence an audience." This definition emphasizes the deliberate nature of
terrorism and the primary aim to influence a broader public, government policy, or international relations through the spectacle of
violence. Also, the U.K. Home Office (2000) sees terrorism as "the use or threat of action to influence the government or to
intimidate the public in pursuit of political, religious, or ideological objectives." The Home Office definition highlights the role of
intimidation and the broader social objectives pursued through terrorizing civilians and governments alike.
In his view, Laqueur (1977) a renowned scholar in the study of terrorism, defines terrorism as "the use of violence and threats to
intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes." Laqueur's definition highlights the intentionality of terrorism, focusing on
the strategic purpose behind violence: to intimidate, coerce, or influence political decisions, often through creating fear within the
broader society. To Rapoport (1984) a key theorist in terrorism studies, defines terrorism as "the deliberate use of violence to
instill fear for political, religious, or ideological purposes." Rapoport’s work emphasizes the deliberate, fear-inducing aspect of
terrorism and links it to the need to achieve political or ideological goals, often challenging the political status quo.
In addition to the above, Wilkinson’s (1993) defined terrorism as "coercive intimidation, premeditated acts, or threats of violence
systematically aimed at instilling fear in a target to alter its behavior." Wilkinson emphasizes the systematic nature of terrorism,
focusing on its objective of altering the behavior of governments or societies through the instillation of fear. This definition
highlights the strategic and methodical approach terrorists use to achieve their goals.
Herdman (1937) expands the definition by stating that terrorism involves "systematic violence by an organized group or party to
achieve its aims," with the distinction that even governments might engage in terrorism to achieve state objectives. This definition
acknowledges state-sponsored terrorism and the organizational structure behind terrorist actions. Schmid & Jongman (1988) in
their analysis, argue that terrorism involves four essential elements: "Premeditation planned in advance, not impulsive; Political
motives aimed at changing political orders rather than criminal pursuits; Civilian targets focuses on non-military populations;
Non-state actors typically carried out by sub-national groups." This definition provides a comprehensive framework for
understanding terrorism, emphasizing the political motives behind attacks and the typical targeting of non-combatants.
Each of the forgoing definitions provides a unique perspective on what constitutes terrorism, yet they all agree on the centrality of
violence or the threat of violence used to achieve political, ideological, or religious goals. Understanding the diverse
interpretations of terrorism is essential for formulating counter-terrorism strategies, as it enables policymakers to consider both
the immediate and long-term consequences of terrorism on societies.
Types of Terrorism
Terrorism can be classified into different categories based on its objectives, methods, and the groups or individuals involved. One
common classification is by the objectives sought:
i. Revolutionary Terrorism: This seeks to overthrow or replace existing political regimes. Groups that engage in revolutionary
terrorism often do so because they believe the current system is oppressive and that violent action is the only means to enact
change. The goal is typically to replace the ruling government with a more favorable system, which may include a different
political, economic, or social order. Famous examples of revolutionary terrorism include the actions of groups like the Weather
Underground in the United States during the 1960s and 1970s, as well as more radical movements like the Red Brigades in Italy.
These groups often aim for systemic change through violent means, seeing their actions as necessary to dismantle entrenched
political structures.
ii. Nationalist Terrorism: This is motivated by the desire for independence or self-determination. It occurs when a group within
a nation feels oppressed or marginalized by the central government, and the group seeks autonomy, sovereignty, or the
establishment of its own state. One of the most notable examples of nationalist terrorism is the Irish Republican Army (IRA) in
Northern Ireland, which used violent tactics to push for Irish independence from Britain. Similarly, the Palestinian Liberation
Organization (PLO) and groups like ETA (Euskadi Ta Askatasuna) in Spain have used terrorism to pursue nationalist and
separatist goals. These groups often operate in regions where political, ethnic, or religious identity is a point of contention.
iii. Religious Terrorism: This terrorism is driven by the belief that a particular religious ideology justifies the use of violence to
achieve political or social goals. Groups involved in religious terrorism often view their actions as divinely sanctioned or
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue II, February 2025
www.ijltemas.in Page 80
necessary to further a religious cause. These groups may target both civilians and non-believers, seeing their violence as a form of
holy war or jihad. In recent decades, religious terrorism has gained significant international attention, particularly with the rise of
radical Islamic groups like Al-Qaeda, ISIS, and Boko Haram. These groups interpret religious doctrines to justify violence against
non-believers or those they deem as enemies of their faith. Religious terrorism can also intersect with other forms of terrorism,
such as nationalist or revolutionary terrorism, where religious beliefs are used as a framework to pursue broader socio-political
goals.
Each category of terrorism operates under different dynamics, requiring unique strategies for prevention, response, and counter-
terrorism efforts. Understanding the motives behind terrorism is crucial for developing effective counter-terrorism policies and
strategies. It is not enough to simply target the groups responsible for attacks; governments and international organizations must
also address the root causes of terrorism, such as political oppression, social inequality, and ideological extremism, in order to
reduce the appeal of terrorism as a method of achieving political or religious objectives.
Moreover, as terrorism continues to evolve, it is important to recognize the ways in which new technologies and communication
platforms have amplified its reach and impact. In the 21st century, the internet and social media have become powerful tools for
terrorist organizations to spread their messages, recruit new members, and coordinate attacks.
This global interconnectedness occasioned by globalization propelled by ICT revolution has made it more difficult for traditional
security and intelligence agencies to prevent terrorist activities and to track the financing and movements of terrorist groups.
Consequently, counter-terrorism efforts must adapt to the digital age, emphasizing cybersecurity, international cooperation, and
the regulation of online platforms that may be exploited by terrorist organizations.
On the whole, terrorism is a multi-faceted and complex issue that requires a nuanced approach to understand its various
motivations and methods. Its impacts extend beyond the immediate loss of life and destruction of infrastructure, affecting entire
societies in both direct and indirect ways. By understanding the different types of terrorism and their underlying causes,
governments and international organizations can better develop strategies to prevent violence, protect civilians, and ultimately
work towards creating a more secure and stable world.
Typologies of Terrorism
Terrorism can be classified into various typologies based on its goals, targets, and actors involved. Wilkinson (as cited in Shultz,
1978) identifies three main categories of terrorism: revolutionary terrorism, sub-revolutionary terrorism, and repressive terrorism.
Revolutionary terrorism seeks to overthrow an existing political order and replace it with a new system. This form of terrorism is
often associated with groups that want to replace a government or regime, as seen in the case of the Irish Republican Army (IRA)
or the Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka.
Sub-revolutionary terrorism, on the other hand, pursues political goals that do not involve the complete overthrow of the
government but seek to influence policies or bring attention to specific issues. This type of terrorism is often carried out by
smaller, less organized groups that aim to disrupt the status quo and draw attention to perceived injustices. The actions of groups
like the Ogoni Youths in Nigeria and the Niger Delta militancy exemplify sub-revolutionary terrorism.
Repressive terrorism involves the use of force by governments to suppress or eliminate opposition groups or ideologies. State-
sponsored terrorism, where governments directly or indirectly support terrorist organizations, is another form of terrorism.
Governments may use terrorism as a tool to suppress dissent or maintain control over their populations, as seen in various
authoritarian regimes.
Other typologies terrorism according to Martin (2006) are:
i. State-Sponsored Terrorism: This refers to acts of terrorism supported or executed by governments to further their
political, military, or ideological agendas. Historically, this type of terrorism was exemplified during World War I, Germany
deployed over 110,000 chemical shells filled with phosgene gas in its 1916 offensive against French forces in Verdun. This use of
chemical warfare marked one of the early examples of state-directed terror. Historians estimate that chemical weapons employed
during World War I resulted in fatalities ranging from 300,000 to 900,000 individuals (Fitzgerald, 2008). State-sponsored
terrorism highlights how terrorism can serve not only as a method of resistance against states but also as a deliberate policy tool
used by governments.
ii. Left-Wing Terrorism: This is a form of terrorism driven by opposition to capitalist systems, often seeking to replace
them with socialist or communist governance. Examples of groups are:
i. The Red Army Faction (formerly Baader-Meinhof Group) in Germany The Japanese Red Army
ii. The Weather Underground (also known as The Weathermen) in the United States during the 1970s The Red Brigades in Italy.
With the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War in the early 1990s, left-wing terrorism significantly
decreased in prevalence (Martin, 2013).
iii. Right-Wing Terrorism: This involves movements that aim to overthrow liberal democracies and establish
authoritarian or fascist regimes. It is characterized characteristics by frequently targets immigrants, refugees, and minorities,
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue II, February 2025
www.ijltemas.in Page 81
reflecting xenophobic, racist, and anti-Semitic ideologies. Examples includes Neo-fascist organizations across Europe and the
United States have been involved in violent attacks against marginalized communities, driven by supremacist beliefs (Hoffman,
2017).
Nature of Terrorists
Terrorists, contrary to popular stereotypes, are not always disorganized or illiterate individuals. Many are highly educated, well-
trained, and often come from socio-political backgrounds that fuel their radicalization. Nwolise (1999) emphasize that terrorists
tend to be young, dedicated, and driven by ideological convictions. The idea that terrorists are solely motivated by poverty or lack
of education has been debunked in recent years, as terrorist organizations have recruited individuals from a variety of social and
economic backgrounds. Terrorists are often motivated by a sense of injustice or the belief that violence is the only means of
achieving their political or religious goals. For example, in Nigeria, Boko Haram's rise to prominence was partly fueled by a
sense of marginalization, frustration with government corruption, and a desire to establish an Islamic state. Similarly, groups like
ISWAP exploit socio-economic disparities and religious divisions to recruit individuals and gain support.
The recruitment strategies of terrorist organizations are increasingly sophisticated, with an emphasis on psychological
manipulation and propaganda. Terrorist groups use social media and other digital platforms to reach a global audience, promote
their ideologies, and recruit new members. This evolution in recruitment methods has made it more difficult for governments to
track and prevent radicalization. Terrorists often operate in cells or decentralized networks, making it challenging for authorities
to infiltrate or dismantle these groups. The rise of lone-wolf terrorism, where individuals carry out attacks independently, further
complicates efforts to combat terrorism. These individuals may not have direct connections to organized terrorist groups but are
often inspired by extremist ideologies.
Causes of Terrorism
The causes of terrorism are complex and multifaceted, involving a combination of socio-political, economic, and psychological
factors. Opafola (2008) categorizes the causes of terrorism into long-term and short-term factors. Long-term causes typically
include deep-seated issues such as poverty, political disenfranchisement, inequality, and social alienation. In many African
countries, including Nigeria, poverty remains a significant driver of terrorism, as individuals who feel excluded from the
economic and political mainstream may be more susceptible to extremist ideologies. Short-term factors, such as sudden ethnic or
religious tensions, government repression, and violence, can also trigger terrorist activities. For instance, the rise of Boko Haram
in Nigeria was accelerated by the political repression faced by the group’s leader, Mohammed Yusuf, and the perceived neglect of
northern Nigeria by the central government.
The environmental context in which terrorism occurs is equally important. Terrorism can be both an internal and external
phenomenon, with groups targeting their own governments or foreign interests. For example, Al-Qaeda’s attacks on U.S.
embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were motivated by the group’s opposition to U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East, while
groups like Boko Haram primarily focus on domestic issues related to governance and religion. Terrorist groups also exploit
regional instability and conflicts to further their agenda. In regions where weak governance and security structures prevail,
terrorist organizations can thrive. The porous borders in the Sahel region, for example, have allowed groups like Al-Qaeda in the
Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) to operate with relative impunity.
Gaps in the Literature
Though the literature review is thorough, that does not mean that there are no gaps in the review. Some gaps in the literature
includes but not limited to the follow:
i. Most of the definitions provided come from Western institutions (FBI, UN, EU, U.S. Department of State, UK Home Office).
ii. There is a lack of perspectives from non-Western countries or scholars, particularly from regions that have experienced
prolonged terrorism (e.g., the Middle East, Africa, South Asia).
iii. While multiple definitions of terrorism are provided, the discussion does not fully explore why a universally accepted
definition has remained elusive.
iv. The political interests of states and international organizations in defining terrorism to suit their agendas are not critically
examined.
v. The literature does not address how terrorism has evolved with technological advancements, particularly cyberterrorism.
vi. Modern forms of terrorism, such as online radicalization and digital propaganda, are missing from the analysis.
Theoretical Framework
Conflict theory provides a robust framework for understanding the dynamics of terrorism and counter-terrorism in Africa,
especially in Nigeria. By emphasizing the unequal distribution of resources and power, the theory helps explain the root causes,
persistence, and varying forms of terrorism in the region. Unlike functionalist theories that emphasize societal cohesion, conflict
theory focuses on the structural inequalities that lead to systemic tensions. Conflict theory emphasizes that societal dynamics are
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue II, February 2025
www.ijltemas.in Page 82
driven by struggles over scarce resources and power, with Weber's systems of stratificationclass, status, and power playing a
pivotal role. This perspective contrasts with functionalism, which views society as a cohesive system maintained by shared
values.
The central tenet of conflict theory lies in the unequal distribution of resources class, status, and power as identified by Weber
(1946). In Nigeria, resource control, particularly of oil wealth in the Niger Delta, has been a source of conflict. Perceptions of
exploitation and marginalization among communities in resource-rich regions fuel grievances that terrorist groups, such as the
Niger Delta Avengers, exploit to gain support and legitimacy. In the northern region of Nigeria, Boko Haram capitalizes on
widespread poverty, low levels of education, and political exclusion to recruit members. The stark inequalities between Nigeria's
north and south exemplify the kind of systemic stratification conflict theorists like Coser (1987) and Marx (1977) argue lead to
unrest.
Marx's concept of deprivation provides further insights into the motivations behind terrorism. Absolute deprivation refers to a
state of destitution that leaves individuals unable to engage in conflict. In contrast, relative deprivation, as modernized by Gurr
(1970), is the perception of being disadvantaged compared to others. This perception is particularly significant in Nigeria, where
rising expectations among youth are unmet due to systemic unemployment and corruption. For instance, Boko Haram's rise is
partly attributed to feelings of relative deprivation among northern Muslims, who perceive themselves as socially and
economically disadvantaged relative to their southern counterparts. This gap fosters a sense of injustice, creating fertile ground
for radical ideologies. Power dynamics are central to conflict theory. In Nigeria, elites' monopolization of political and economic
power exacerbates societal divides. According to elite theory, the dominance of a small group over the majority perpetuates
inequalities, making society more prone to conflict. This dynamic is evident in Nigeria’s patronage system, where political elites
use resources to maintain their influence, sidelining marginalized groups.
Coser (1987) argues that conflict is both instinctual and functional. In Nigeria, internal conflicts within terrorist groups often lead
to splinter factions, as seen with Boko Haram and its offshoot, the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP). These internal
struggles can either weaken terrorist movements by dividing their leadership or escalate violence as factions compete for
dominance. Conversely, external conflicts, such as those between terrorist groups and the Nigerian state, tend to solidify group
boundaries and enhance cohesion among members. Boko Haram, for example, has utilized external conflict with the state to
reinforce its ideological narrative and attract recruits.
Conflict can have both integrative and disintegrative effects, as highlighted by Coser which he referred to as integrative and
disintegrative. According to him, integrative effects occur when internal conflicts that are less violent can clarify group norms and
strengthen organizational structure. This is evident in the development of Boko Haram’s internal governance systems. On the
other hand, disintegrative effects results to violent external conflicts which often destabilize communities, leading to
displacements and long-term socio-economic challenges. Nigeria's counter-terrorism efforts, while necessary, have sometimes
exacerbated grievances by causing collateral damage, further alienating affected populations.
Counter-terrorism strategies must address the structural causes of conflict to be effective. Focusing solely on military
interventions without tackling systemic inequalities perpetuates the cycle of violence. Initiatives such as improving access to
education, creating economic opportunities, and ensuring equitable resource distribution are critical for long-term stability.
Conflict theory offers a lens to understand the socio-economic and political underpinnings of terrorism in Nigeria. By
highlighting the unequal distribution of resources, relative deprivation, and power struggles, the theory underscores the need for
holistic approaches to counter-terrorism that go beyond military responses to address the root causes of conflict.
Origin of Terrorism in Africa
Terrorism in Africa has deep historical roots, with early instances of violent resistance emerging in the early 20th century.
According to Igbinovia (1993), terrorism in Africa can be traced back to 1904, when groups such as the Mau Mau in Kenya used
violent tactics to resist British colonial rule. Over the decades, terrorism in Africa has evolved, with various groups employing
different strategies to achieve their goals. In the post-colonial period, terrorism in Africa began to take on new forms, particularly
with the involvement of external actors. In the 1970s, the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) and other Middle Eastern
groups began hijacking aircraft and carrying out attacks in African countries such as Libya and Uganda. These acts of terrorism
were aimed at drawing attention to the Palestinian cause and further destabilizing the political landscape in Africa.
By the 1980s, terrorism in Africa began to take on a more localized form, with groups in countries like Algeria, Uganda, and
Angola carrying out bombings and assassinations. In the 1990s, terrorism spread to new regions, with the rise of groups like Al-
Qaeda and local militias engaging in violence across Africa. The rise of Islamic extremist groups, particularly in the Sahel and
Horn of Africa, has further complicated the security situation. Groups like Al-Shabaab in Somalia and Boko Haram in Nigeria
have carried out deadly attacks on civilians, government forces, and international targets. These groups have gained international
attention for their brutal tactics, including suicide bombings, kidnappings, and massacres.
Terrorism in Nigeria
Nigeria has experienced significant challenges related to terrorism, both before and after its independence in 1960. Early forms of
terrorism in Nigeria included political violence, ethnic clashes, and militant resistance movements. Following independence, the
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue II, February 2025
www.ijltemas.in Page 83
country faced several instances of post-election violence, as well as political unrest and civil war. The Nigerian Civil War (1967
1970) was one of the most significant periods of violent conflict in the country, with both sides using terrorist tactics to achieve
their goals (Adejoh, & Adisa, 2017).
In the post-colonial period, terrorism in Nigeria evolved into more organized forms, with ethnic militias and separatist groups
gaining prominence. The Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND) is one example of an ethnic-based group
that used terrorism to demand greater political and economic autonomy for the Niger Delta region (Aworawo, 2017). The rise of
Boko Haram in the 2000s marked a new phase of terrorism in Nigeria, with the group adopting extremist ideologies and using
violence to destabilize the government. Boko Haram's insurgency has led to thousands of deaths, displacement of millions, and
widespread destruction of infrastructure. The group has carried out numerous high-profile attacks, including the kidnapping of the
Chibok schoolgirls in 2014, which garnered international attention.
In addition to Boko Haram, Nigeria has faced other forms of terrorism, including attacks by ethnic militias and the rise of herders-
farmers conflicts, which have resulted in deadly clashes between ethnic groups and agricultural communities. In his assessment of
terrorism in Nigeria, Abdullahi (2018) highlights the Nigerian government's insufficient use of Information and Communications
Technology (ICT) to combat terrorism. He argues that the activities of terrorist groups like Boko Haram could be more
effectively monitored through data collection and analysis, including the use of modern ICT tools such as Statistical Packages for
Social Sciences (SPSS). These tools could help security agencies gather primary and secondary data, process it, and analyze it to
mobilize resources effectively. (Alita, et.al (2022)
As Alimi (2018) notes, ICT applications in security include electronic surveillance, which is crucial for monitoring terrorist
activities in real-time. Technologies like Closed-Circuit Television (CCTV) cameras can be deployed in strategic locations to
track human operations and identify suspects and their accomplices, as discussed by Hodson (2016). Furthermore, Odeniyi &
Abdullahi (2022) suggest that in regions like Northern Nigeria, the installation of CCTV cameras in key areas could provide
valuable insights into terrorist operations, making it easier for security forces to carry out arrests and respond to threats.
Despite efforts from the Nigerian military, with assistance from a joint military force including Benin, Cameroon, Chad, and
Niger, to push Boko Haram out of several regions in northeastern Nigeria, the group still controls certain areas and continues to
carry out deadly suicide attacks and abductions, particularly targeting women and children (Global Conflict Tracker, 2022).
Causes of terrorism in Nigeria
a. Political Grievances: Nigeria's governance challenges, including corruption, weak institutions, and the exclusion of specific
groups, particularly in the northern regions, have fueled grievances. The perceived neglect and marginalization of northern
communities by the central government have created resentment, which terrorist groups like Boko Haram exploit (Thurston,
2020).
b. Economic Inequalities: Northern Nigeria is characterized by widespread poverty and unemployment, making it a fertile
ground for extremist recruitment. According to Agbiboa (2017), economic disparities between northern and southern Nigeria
exacerbate tensions, with the youth being particularly vulnerable to radicalization.
c. Religious and Ideological Factors: Boko Haram’s rise is deeply rooted in religious extremism. The group’s founder,
Mohammed Yusuf, advocated for a radical interpretation of Islam, rejecting Western education and governance. These
ideologies resonate with disaffected individuals in a region where formal education and state presence are limited (Botha,
2020).
d. Weak Security Infrastructure: Nigeria's inability to effectively counter terrorism stems from inadequate security
infrastructure, poor intelligence coordination, and limited resources. This weakness allows terrorist groups to operate with
relative impunity, particularly in remote areas (Zenn, 2021).
e. Cross-Border Challenges: Nigeria’s porous borders with Chad, Niger, and Cameroon facilitate the movement of arms,
fighters, and resources, sustaining terrorist activities in the region (Institute for Economics and Peace, 2023).
Impacts of Terrorism in Nigeria
The consequences of terrorism in Nigeria are profound, affecting multiple dimensions:
a. Humanitarian Crisis: Boko Haram’s insurgency has displaced over 2.5 million people, creating one of the world’s most
severe humanitarian crises. Refugee camps in northeastern Nigeria are overcrowded, and access to basic services like
healthcare and education remains limited (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, 2023).
b. Economic Disruption: The economic impact of terrorism in Nigeria is immense, particularly in the northeast. Agricultural
activities, the main livelihood of many in the region, have been disrupted, leading to food insecurity. The World Bank (2022)
estimates that the Nigerian economy loses billions annually due to terrorism-related disruptions.
c. Educational Setbacks: Boko Haram’s opposition to Western education has resulted in targeted attacks on schools, such as
the abduction of Chibok schoolgirls in 2014. These incidents have caused widespread fear, leading to the closure of schools
and depriving children of education (Agbiboa, 2017).
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue II, February 2025
www.ijltemas.in Page 84
d. Social Fragmentation: Terrorism exacerbates ethnic and religious divisions in Nigeria, further polarizing communities. This
fragmentation undermines national unity and complicates efforts to foster reconciliation (International Crisis Group, 2022).
e. Security Sector Strain: The Nigerian military and police forces are overstretched, battling multiple security challenges
beyond terrorism, including banditry and communal conflicts. This overstretch limits their effectiveness in counter-terrorism
operations (Williams, 2021).
Counter-Terrorism strategies in Nigeria
The Nigerian government, with support from international partners, has implemented various counter-terrorism strategies to
address the issue. Below is a detailed analysis of these strategies, supported by references to relevant actions and policies:
a. Military and Security Operations
The Nigerian government has relied heavily on military force to combat terrorism. Key aspects include:
Operation Lafiya Dole: Launched in 2015, this military operation aimed to dismantle Boko Haram’s strongholds in the
northeastern states. The operation involved coordinated efforts by the Nigerian Army, Air Force, and Navy.
Multinational Joint Task Force (MNJTF): Nigeria collaborates with neighboring countries such as Chad, Niger, and
Cameroon to form the MNJTF, a regional force aimed at combating terrorism and insurgency in the Lake Chad Basin area.
This joint effort has been crucial in reducing cross-border movements and operations of terrorist groups.
Special Forces and Intelligence Units: Nigeria has invested in training specialized forces and intelligence units, such as the
Department of State Services (DSS) and military intelligence, to enhance counter-terrorism capabilities. Drones and
surveillance technologies have also been introduced to track and neutralize terrorist activities.
b. Community Policing and Vigilante Groups
Recognizing the limitations of conventional military approaches, the government has encouraged community-based security
initiatives:
Civilian Joint Task Force (CJTF): The CJTF, composed of local volunteers, works alongside the military to provide
intelligence, monitor suspicious activities, and guard communities. This grassroots approach has improved local trust and
increased the flow of actionable intelligence.
Traditional Leaders and Religious Institutions: Engaging community leaders in counter-terrorism strategies has fostered
collaboration in identifying and addressing radicalization at the local level
c. Countering Violent Extremism (CVE) Programs
Beyond military efforts, Nigeria has implemented CVE programs to address the root causes of terrorism:
De-Radicalization and Rehabilitation Programs: Initiatives like the Safe Corridor Program provide former Boko Haram
fighters with vocational training, psychological support, and reintegration into society. This approach aims to reduce
recidivism and foster societal acceptance of ex-combatants.
Educational Reforms: Programs targeting vulnerable youth, especially in northern Nigeria, focus on improving access to
quality education and reducing unemployment, which are factors that drive radicalization.
Public Awareness Campaigns: Media campaigns and community outreach programs promote peace building, tolerance, and
anti-extremism narratives.
d. Economic Development and Poverty Alleviation
Economic hardships and unemployment are significant drivers of terrorism in Nigeria. Addressing these issues is central to
counter-terrorism:
Northeast Development Commission (NEDC): Established in 2017, the NEDC focuses on rebuilding infrastructure,
supporting displaced populations, and revitalizing the economy in the region most affected by terrorism.
Social Intervention Programs: Government initiatives like the National Social Investment.
III. Conclusion and Recommendations
This study is of the view that contemporary terrorism is presenting itself as a different kind of conventional warfare and must be
resisted. Terrorists’ activities are second nature to Africa, especially Nigeria. It is carried out by individuals, groups in both
private and public places and offices including the government you least expect. It is government terrorism that has given birth to
other forms of terrorism conducted by individuals and groups. The study also established that indeed there are counter-terrorism
measures in African and specifically in Nigeria, but these strategies have not been able to reduce the menace of terrorism in
Nigeria as well as Africa. Hence, all hands must be on deck to ensure that terrorism is nipped to the bud by ensuring zero
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue II, February 2025
www.ijltemas.in Page 85
tolerance to it. Hence, international non-governmental organizations must partner with multinational bodies to condemn
governments that pursue policies and actions that create terrorist, and use terrorist tactics including policies and impose their will
on others in the name of power politics and scramble for cheap and secure oil.
Despite ongoing counter-terrorism efforts, terrorism remains a major challenge in Africa. To effectively combat terrorism,
governments must adopt more comprehensive and multifaceted approaches. At the national level, governments should focus on
promoting good governance, strengthening security infrastructure, and addressing the root causes of terrorism, such as poverty,
inequality, and political exclusion.
At the continental level, the African Union should continue to strengthen its counter-terrorism initiatives and enhance cooperation
between member states. Establishing a Continental Terrorism Management Center (CTMC) could serve as a hub for research,
intelligence sharing, and training, providing critical support to African governments in their fight against terrorism
References
1. Abdullahi, A. (2018). Assessing ICT's Role in Counterterrorism in Nigeria.
2. Adejoh, P. & Adisa, J. (2017). Terrorism in Africa: A study of Boko Haram in Nigeria. International Journal of Political
Science.
3. Africa Center for Strategic Studies. (2024). Africa 2024 security trends. Retrieved from
https://africacenter.org/spotlight/africa-2024-security-trends-graphics/
4. Agbiboa, D. (2017). Youth unemployment and terrorism in Africa: Causes, consequences, and counter-measures. Journal
of Modern African Studies, 55(2), 237-260.
5. Alimi, S. (2018). The Use of ICT in Combating Terrorism in Nigeria.
6. Alita, E. et.al (2022) African Journal of Politics and Administrative Studies (AJPAS) 15(2)
7. Aworawo, D. (2017). History of Terrorism in Nigeria, in Adejoh, P. and Adisa, W. (Eds.). Terrorism and Counter
Terrorism War in Nigeria, Lagos: University of Lagos Press
8. Business Day Nigeria. (2024). Nigeria remains high in global terrorism index ranking 2024. Retrieved from
https://businessday.ng/news/article/nigeria-remains-high-in-global-terrorism-index-ranking-2024/
9. Business Day Nigeria. (2024). Nigeria remains high in global terrorism index ranking 2024. Retrieved from
https://businessday.ng/news/article/nigeria-remains-high-in-global-terrorism-index-ranking-2024/
10. Coser, L. A. (1987). Continuities in the study of social conflict. New York, NY: Free Press.
11. DTM IOM. (2023). Nigeria displacement report 43, February 2023. International Organization for Migration. Retrieved
from https://dtm.iom.int/reports/nigeria-displacement-report-43-february-2023
12. Financial Times. (2024). Military juntas in Africa's 'coup belt' fail to contain extremist violence. Retrieved from
https://www.ft.com/content/d0af5533-ecdd-4be0-bbb8-e5b3e4bb11b4
13. Fitzgerald, G. J. (2008). Chemical Warfare and Medical Response During World War I. American Journal of Public
Health, 98(4), 611625.
14. GistReel. (2024). Nigeria records over 20,000 deaths in four years Report. Retrieved from
https://www.gistreel.com/nigeria-records-over-20000-deaths-in-four-years-report/
15. Global Conflict Tracker. (2022). Boko Haram's Ongoing Threat in Nigeria.
16. Guardian Nigeria. (2024). Nigeria records 20,472 casualties from 5,291 violent incidents in four years. Retrieved from
https://guardian.ng/news/nigeria-records-20472-casualties-from-5291-violent-incidents-in-four-years/
17. Gurr, T. R. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18. Hardman J. (1937) Terrorism, In Encyclopedia of Social Sciences Cited by Ekwo, E.E. (2005). Nigerian Army Quarterly
Journal, Vol.1 No.2: 206-227
19. Hodson, R. (2016). Surveillance Technologies in Modern Counterterrorism Operations.
20. Hoffman, B. (2017). Inside Terrorism. Columbia University Press.
21. Igbinovia, P. E. (1993). Crime and Development in Africa: Patterns, Trends, and Issues. Lagos: Nigeria Institute of Social
and Economic Research.
22. International Crisis Group. (2022). The Sahel: Coping with terrorism and instability. Brussels: ICG.
23. Laqueur, W. (1977). Terrorism. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.
24. Ludwikowski, R. (1987) Aspects of Terrorism: Personal Reflections, in Terrorism an International Journal, vol.
10, No.3:178-234
25. Martin, G. (2013). Understanding Terrorism: Challenges, Perspectives, and Issues. Sage Publications.
26. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1977). The Communist Manifesto (1848). New York, NY: Penguin Books.
27. New York Post. (2024). Thousands of Christians 'deliberately targeted' and killed in Nigeria by terrorists: Report.
Retrieved from https://nypost.com/2024/09/03/world-news/thousands-of-christians-deliberately-targeted-and-killed-in-
nigeria-report/
28. Nwolisa, O.B.C (1999). Oracles on Terrorism, Lecture to Course 8 Participants of the National War Collage
29. Odeniyi, F., & Abdullahi, A. (2022). CCTV and Counterterrorism in Northern Nigeria: A Strategic Approach.
30. Opafola, S.O. (2008). Ethical Issues in Terrorism, in Olukoju, A. & Falaiye, M. Global understanding in the Age of
Terrorism, Lagos: University of Lagos Press
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue II, February 2025
www.ijltemas.in Page 86
31. Punch Nigeria. (2024). NSA promises tough time for terrorists, others in 2025. Retrieved from https://punchng.com/nsa-
promises-tough-time-for-terrorists-others-in-2025/
32. Punch Nigeria. (2024). NSA promises tough time for terrorists, others in 2025. Retrieved from https://punchng.com/nsa-
promises-tough-time-for-terrorists-others-in-2025/
33. Rapoport, D. C. (1984). "Fear and Trembling: Terrorism in Three Religious Traditions." American Political Science
Review, 78(3), 658677.
34. Schmid, A.P & Jongman, A.J. (1988) Political Terrorism: A New Guide to Actors, Authors, Concepts, Databases,
Theories, and Literature. Amsterdam: Transaction Books
35. Shultz, R. (1978). “Conceptualizing Political Terrorism: A Typology” Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 32 (1): 7- 15.
36. Statista. (2024). Number of internally displaced persons in Nigeria. Retrieved from
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1237374/number-of-internally-displaced-persons-in-nigeria/
37. The Nation. (2024). 2025 Outlook: National security prospects, challenges & emerging threats. Retrieved from
https://thenationonlineng.net/2025-outlook-national-security-prospects-challenges-emerging-threats/
38. The Nation. (2024). 2025 Outlook: National security prospects, challenges & emerging threats. Retrieved from
https://thenationonlineng.net/2025-outlook-national-security-prospects-challenges-emerging-threats/
39. Thurston, A. (2020). Jihadists in northern Mali: An empirical study. African Affairs, 119(476), 1-26.
40. U.K. Home Office (2000). The United Kingdom’s Strategy for Combating International Terrorism. London: Home Office.
41. U.S. Department of State. (2004). Patterns of Global Terrorism. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
42. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2023). Displacement trends in Africa. Geneva: UNHCR.
43. Weber, M. (1946). Essays in sociology (H. H. Gerth & C. Wright Mills, Eds.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press
44. Wilkinson, P. (1993). Terrorism and the liberal state. New York: NYU
45. Williams, P. (2021). AMISOM: Assessing its impact and future. International Peacekeeping, 28(1), 120-135.
46. World Bank. (2022). Economic impacts of terrorism in East Africa. Washington, DC: World Bank.
47. Zenn, J. (2021). The spread of terrorism in the Sahel: Drivers and responses. Journal of Conflict Studies, 35(4), 245-268