INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue VI, June 2025
www.ijltemas.in Page 737
Allah's rules, but the cases that occur show that the freedom possessed is used to fulfil personal interests and commit fraud against
other parties (see PT Kimia Farma Tbk., Enron, Xerox, etc.). The concept of ihsan, benevolence requires the benefits of the world
and the hereafter, while earnings management actually causes many parties to be unbeneficial.
In addition, earnings management that is disclosed reduces the quality of financial statements, reduces the quality of earnings, and
the emergence of asymmetrical information is deemed incompatible with shiddiq, amanah, tabligh, fathonah which means
transparent accountability, openness (disclosure), credibility (credible), true, honest, reliability, justice, caring, awareness,
trustworthy, responsible, loyal to commitment, socialisation, internalisation, communication, information, leadership, exemplary,
knowledge transfer, empathy, consistency, competence.
According to some managers, earnings management is considered a legitimate management tool to be used in fulfilling their
responsibilities to shareholders, but from an ethical point of view, this action means a violation of public trust (Fischer and
Rosenzweig, 1995). It should be noted that there is a good side of earnings management that must be understood, both from a
contracting perspective and a financial reporting perspective (Scott, 2003). From the contracting perspective, earnings management
is related to the efficient contracting versus opportunitic forms in Positive Accounting Theory (PAT).
From the efficient contracting perspective, earnings management is considered a reasonable or legitimate action to take, where
management needs to be given the discretion to "adjust" net income when dealing with imperfect (incomplete) or rigid contracts in
order to protect the interests of the parties involved in the contract. In this case, earnings management is carried out to protect
management and the company in anticipating unexpected events for the benefit of stakeholders involved in the contract. Meanwhile,
from the perspective of opportunitic forms, it needs to be understood that if the purpose of earnings management is only to increase
management bonuses (opportunistic behaviour), it can be said that earnings management practices are actions that are not right or
should not be done. Opportunistic public company managers as holders of inside information can reduce the reliability of the
company for performance assessment, which external parties will find it difficult to know.
If traced further in the frame of ethics and spirituality, earnings management practices both seen from the efficient contracting and
opportunitic forms, both contain elements of "lies" and "deception". Although in the perspective of efficient contracting, earnings
management aims to "protect" stakeholders, but those who get "protection" are only stakeholders involved in the contract and not
all related stakeholders, namely: management, shareholders, employees, creditors, government and society. In fact, the management
of the company should be responsible for maintaining accountability in a company or organisation, so that no stakeholders are
harmed by the existence of the organisation or company. Ludigdo (2004) states that accountability refers to the implementation of
the accounting process and the production of financial reports that describe the company's actual financial condition.
Accountability was originally born due to the relationship between management (agent) and owners (principal), and (considered)
to improve the provision of reliable, accurate, and trustworthy information (Kholmi, 2010 and Salle 2015). However, this right does
not yet represent the full reality so that at this level the virtue of prophetic accountability is better able to capture reality because
the orientation is based on worship for the universe and the people. Prophetic accountability is formed from three phases of life's
spiritual journey, namely mortality, death, and life. First of all, mortality is the current state of modern accountability which is filled
with lust so that it covers its inner eyes of a higher reality. Secondly, death means subduing the dimension of lust, it is no longer the
guiding path in life, but must be subdued. The process of death itself consists of giving up and then serving oneself with full
awareness to walk along a sacred genesis that will eventually be brought down, in this case in the intact building of prophetic
accountability. Furthermore, the negation of the body, this is done because the "body" of accountability is a contractual container
that is detached from all the relationships that exist around it. This is inseparable from agency theory as the root of prophetic
accountability. Next is life in its positioning in the universe, this is the foundation as rahmatan lil alamin and worship that prophetic
accountability will bring.
Referring to Kuntowijoyo (2007), social science should not be complacent in its attempts to explain or understand reality and then
forgive it. However, the most important thing is the task of transformation towards divinity. Prophetic accountability is a movement
of social transformation towards divinity. Humanisation is manifested from the mandate which is one of the foundations of prophetic
accountability development. This humanisation means returning to his duty as a human being on this earth, namely to prosper the
universe, both humans and other creatures so that there is no more exploitation in the name of accountability as a claim to the
realisation of a perfect picture of economic reality. Nahi munkar is interpreted as liberation, liberating material orientations that can
later move civilisation away from the centre of essence. The purpose of amar ma'ruf (humanisation) is to humanise accountability,
which has undergone a dehumanisation process without a human face. Accountability has only become a corporate manifestation,
a political machine, and an accountability tool that does not have a divine foundation. The goal of nahi munkar (liberation) is the
liberation of accountability from corporate, structural, and extortionary cruelty. So far we have only been trapped in the space of
capitalist hubris and technocratic consciousness. In the end all will lead to God. This is what we call transcendence, as in the
definition of prophetic accountability itself that the centre of responsibility and trust is Allah SWT. The purpose of tu'minuna billah
(transcendence) is to add a transcendental dimension to culture. Accountability has been very shackled by the flow of materialism
so that a cleansing must be carried out that realises its nature, returning to the path of God which is full of grace for nature.
Humans are God's representatives on earth, implementing prophetic values, realising the welfare of humans and the universe.
Trituwono (1997; 2000a; 2000b) in "Metaphor of trust", describes the world as a company and humans as its managers, creating