INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue VII, July 2025
www.ijltemas.in Page 293
Antibacterial Activities of Daucus Carota Against Urinary Tract
Pathogen Escherichia Coli Isolated from Urine Specimen Collected
from The Students of Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria
Eze, H.C, Euphemia Afoma Ikegwuonu, U.O, Okoli, Chukwujekwu, Anulika, G, Okonkwo, Ngozi Nonyelum,
Department of Applied Microbiology and Brewery, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka Anambra State, Nigeria.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1407000033
Received: 18 June 2025; Accepted: 26 June 2025; Published: 04 Aug 2025
Abstract: The rising prevalence of antimicrobial resistance has prompted an increased interest in natural remedies such as plant-
based antimicrobials. Among these, Daucus carota (carrot) is recognized for its potential antibacterial and antifungal properties.
This study investigated the antibacterial activity of Daucus carota extracts against Escherichia coli isolated from urine specimens.
Furthermore, the study evaluated the antimicrobial susceptibility of these pathogens using carrot extracts that quantifies the major
phytochemical constituents of the carrot rhizome. The antimicrobial susceptibility testing was carried out using the in-vitro method,
wherein varying concentrations of carrot extracts (aqueous extracts of carrot) were applied to the test pathogen. Zones of inhibition
were measured to assess the sensitivity of the pathogen Escherichia coli. The results revealed that carrot extracts exhibited
significant antibacterial activity as (7mm, 5mm, 10mm, 1mm, 8mm) against tested pathogen. The phytochemical analysis revealed
that carrot contains high levels of bioactive compounds, including flavonoids, alkaloids, tannins, saponins, resins, steroids,
glycosides and phenolic compounds through phytochemical analysis. These compounds maybe responsible for the observed
antimicrobial properties. The findings suggest that carrot extracts possess notable antimicrobial properties, particularly against
bacteria responsible for urinary tract infections. This suggests that Daucus carota can be used as a natural alternative to ineffective
synthetic antibiotics for treating infections caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens.
I. Introduction
The background of Study
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are among the most common bacterial infections affecting millions of individual worldwide, with a
significant burden on healthcare systems and patient quality of life (Chan et al., 2017). The primary causative agents of UTIs are
bacteria, predominantly Escherichia coli (E. coli), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), and Salmonella species (Ejidike
et al., 2022). The increasing prevalence of antibiotic resistance among these pathogens has highlighted the urgent need for
alternative therapeutic strategies. In recent years, there has been growing interest in exploring natural compounds with antibacterial
properties as potential alternatives to conventional antibiotics (Biriyani et al., 2020).
Carrots (Daucus carota L.) are widely consumed vegetables known for their nutritional value and health-promoting properties
(Hadyarrahman et al., 2017). Beyond their well-documented antioxidant and anticancer activities, carrots have also been reported
to possess antimicrobial properties against a range of pathogens, including bacteria and fungi (Haryati et al., 2017). Several studies
have investigated the potential antibacterial activity of carrot extracts or constituents against various bacterial strains, including
those commonly associated with UTIs.
Salmonella species is a bacterial species commonly found in the genitourinary tract and is implicated in both uncomplicated and
complicated UTIs, especially in immunocompromised individuals (Walker et al., 2017). Traditional antibacterial agents used to
treat salmonella infections often have limited efficacy and are associated with side effects and the emergence of resistant strains
(Garcia-Rubio et al., 2020). Therefore, there is a pressing need to explore alternative antibacterial agents, such as plant-derived
compounds, to combat Salmonella infections effectively (Naglik., 2019). Escherichia coli is a Gram-negative bacterium that
colonizes the gastrointestinal tract of humans and animals but can also cause UTIs when it ascends the urinary tract (Nanda et al.,
2017). It is the most common bacterial pathogen associated with UTIs, accounting for approximately 75-95% of cases (Mueller et
al., 2021). The emergence of multidrug-resistant strains of Escherichia coli poses a significant challenge in the treatment of UTIs,
necessitating the search for novel antimicrobial agents (Vargas et al., 2017). Staphylococcus aureus is a Gram-positive bacterium
that colonizes the skin and mucous membranes of humans and animals and is a leading cause of various infections, including UTIs
(Khanal LK et al., 2018). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains, in particular, have become a major public
health concern due to their resistance to multiple antibiotics, including β-lactams, which are commonly used to treat Staphylococcus
aureus infections (Raut S et al., 2017).
The antibacterial activity of carrots against Escherichia coli (E. coli), Salmonella species, and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus)
can be attributed to various constituents present in carrots such as carotenoids, polyacetylenes, minerals, vitamins, phenolic
compounds (Ananthanarayan et al., 2020).
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue VII, July 2025
www.ijltemas.in Page 294
Overall, the multifaceted antibacterial activity of carrots against E. coli, Salmonella species, and S. aureus is mediated by a
combination of mechanisms involving membrane disruption, cell wall inhibition, oxidative stress, and enzyme inhibition (Gandra
S et al., 2019).
Aim of Study
The aim of this research is to investigate the antibacterial potential of carrot extracts or compounds against Salmonella species,
Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aeurus, the major pathogens associated with urinary tract infections.
Specific Objectives of the Study:
ï‚· to collect samples and specimen;
ï‚· to isolate the putative organisms from urine specimen;
ï‚· to screen the samples for bioactive ingredients;
ï‚· to determine the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of carrot
extract required to inhibit the growth of these (putative) pathogens;
ï‚· to evaluate the antibacterial properties of carrot extracts against Salmonella species, Staphylococcus aureus, and
Escherichia coli and,
ï‚· to compare the antibacterial efficacy of carrot extract with conventional antibiotics;
II. Materials and Methods
Sample collection and classification
In this study, urine specimens were collected at random from students of Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Anambra state. Each
was classified according to names, genders and age.
A total of 10 urine specimen were collected, consisting of 5 urine specimen from male students and 5 urine specimen from female
students.
Collection of urine specimen was as follows:
Ten (10) urine specimens were collected from each of the above mentioned institution for analyses.
Each student was given one urine sample container labelled specimen A to J respectively, the container was dried, clean, wide-
necked, and leak-proof. Then the student was requested to collect mid-stream urine specimen into the container (Monica
Cheesbrough et al., 2015).
Collection of leaf samples
Collection, authentication and processing of plant materials
3 kg root vegetables of carrot were purchased from Eke Awka market in Awka north Local Government Area, Anambra State,
Nigeria. The plant materials were identified and authenticated by Dr. Okolie Christopher, a Botanist at the Botany Department of
Nnamdi Azikwe University, Awka, Nigeria. Confirmation of taxonomic identity of the plant was achieved by comparison with
voucher samples kept at the Herbarium of the Department of Botany Sciences, UNIZIK. Preparations of Media for Isolation
The media used for this study were: Nutrient agar, blood agar, chocolate agar, Nutrient broth. The media were prepared according
to the manufacturer's instruction and sterilized by autoclaving at I21 °C, 15 psi for 15 minutes.
Isolation and characterization
Each of the fresh urine specimens was inoculated onto Nutrient agar, urea agar, Simmons citrate agar and Blood agar media and
incubated at 37 °C for 18–24 hours. All the plates were incubated aerobically and were initially examined for growth after 24 hours;
each visible colony were visually inspected and counted manually to determine the amount of colony forming units (CFU) present
in each plate.
Discrete colonies on various plates were sub-cultured onto nutrient agar and incubated for 24 hours. The various isolate underwent
identification testing. Identification of the isolate was performed from pure colonies using classical biochemical tests (Gram
Staining, Urease, hemolysis, citrate, oxidase and catalase). (Monica Cheesbrough et al., 2015).
Gram staining
This reaction was done to identity organisms that are Gram positive (+ve) and Gram negative (-ve)
Procedure – A drop of normal saline was placed on a clean grease free slide, using a sterile wire loop, a smear of the culture was
made on the slide and heat fixed. The fixed smear was flooded with crystal violent stain (primary stain) for 60 seconds. The stain
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue VII, July 2025
www.ijltemas.in Page 295
was rapidly washed off with distilled water and drained quickly, then flooded with lugol’s iodine (a mordant) for 60 seconds and
was washed off with distilled water. The slide was flooded with 95% ethanol (decolorizer) for 5 seconds. After which the slide was
washed with distilled water and then flooded with safranin (counterstain) for 30 seconds and then washed off. The back of the slide
was cleaned and placed in a draining rack for the stained smear to dry. The standard smear was then allowed to air dry and then
viewed under the microscope using x100 objections lens with a drop of immersion oil (Anand et al., 2020).
Catalase Test
Procedure– A loopful of hydrogen peroxide was dropped onto a clean, grease-free slide. The isolate was then mixed with the
hydrogen peroxide on the slide. The mixture was observed for the immediate production of gas bubbles, indicating a positive
reaction, while no gas bubbles indicated a negative reaction.
Hemolysis test
The hemolysis test is a biochemical test performed on bacterial species to determine the ability of the organism to break down red
blood cells.
Procedure: colonies were collected then inoculated into already prepared blood agar and incubated at 37
o
C for 24 hours. A positive
hemolysis test indicates Beta haemolysis which indicates the complete lysis of red blood cells, or Alpha hemolysis, which is the
reduction of the red blood cell haemoglobin to methemoglobin in the medium surrounding the colony, Gamma hemolysis indicates
lack of hemolysis. There should be no reaction surrounding the medium.
Oxidase test
The oxidase test is a biochemical test to check if an organism produces the enzyme cytochrome c oxidase.
Procedure: Colony was suspended in a small amount of sterile water or broth. A sterile inoculation loop was used to transfer small
inoculum to the centre of a filter paper and also 2-3 drops of the reagent was dropped. Colour change was observed.
Urease test
The urease test is used to determine the ability of an organism to split urea, through the production of the enzyme urease. This test
is primarily used to differentiate between members of the genera Proteus, Providencia, and Morganella, which are urease-positive,
from other Enterobacteriaceae, which are urease-negative.
Procedure: The isolate was inoculated onto a urea agar medium and incubated at 37 °C for 18-24 hours. The plate was then
observed for growth and a color change in the medium. If the organism was urease-positive, the urea was hydrolyzed to ammonia,
raising the pH and causing a color change to pink or magenta. If the organism was urease-negative, the medium remained yellow.
Citrate Test
The citrate test is a diagnostic test used to determine whether a bacterial isolate can utilize citrate as the sole carbon source. It is
primarily used to differentiate members of the Enterobacteriaceae family.
Procedure: The isolate was inoculated onto a Simmons citrate agar medium. The inoculated plate was incubated at 37 °C for 18-
24 hours. The plate was observed for the presence of growth and a color change in the medium. If the organism was citrate-positive,
it used the citrate in the medium as the sole carbon source and produced an alkaline byproduct, causing a color change in the
medium from green to blue. If the organism was citrate-negative, the medium remained green.
Maintenance of Test Organisms
The isolated test organisms were used for the antibacterial sensitivity testing. Prior to the test, the organisms were sub-cultured on
nutrient agar plate and incubated at 37 °C for 24 hours. Then the 24 hour cultures were transferred into nutrient broth and incubated
anaerobically using gas pack at 37 °C for 24 hours (Cheesbrough et al., 2015).
Standardization of Inoculum
The inoculum was prepared from the stock cultures, which were maintained on nutrient agar slant at 4
0
C and sub-cultured onto
nutrient broth using a sterilized wire loop. The density of suspension inoculated onto the media for susceptibility test was determined
by comparison with 0.5 McFarland standard of Barium sulphate solution. (Cheesbrough et al., 2015).
Test Organisms
Escherichia coli was bacteria specie isolated from urine specimen. This was followed by washing with physiological saline and
streaking urine specimen on nutrient agar medium for isolation. Cultural and morphological identification as well as biochemical
characterization of isolates using protocol described by (Cheesbrough et al., 2015) was carried out. Pure cultures of the isolates
were maintained in appropriate medium for future use.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue VII, July 2025
www.ijltemas.in Page 296
Antibiotics sensitivity Testing:
Under sterile condition, isolates of gram-negative bacteria, that has been standardized using McFarland standard of concentration
(0.5 colony forming units per ml), was spread plated on all labeled Mueller hinton agar plates accordingly, using a sterile swab
glass spreader, and allowed for few minutes to dry. Antibiotic sensitivity discs containing Rifampicin, Cefuroxime, Ceftezole,
Azithromycin, Amoxicillin, Ciprofloxacin, Erythromycin, Levofloxacin and Gentamycin, were placed on each agar plate and gently
pressed with a sterile wire loop to ensure it was firmly attached to the agar medium. Plates were incubated for 24 hours, at room
temperature. After that, plates were observed for zones of inhibition around the discs; zones were measured using a transparent
ruler and values were recorded.
Antibacterial Assay
Medicinal plants using agar well diffusion method.
This was carried out by using agar well diffusion techniques. In this method, each of the labelled plates was uniformly inoculated
with the organisms using pour plate techniques. A sterile cork-borer of 6mm diameter was used to make wells on the medium. 0.1
milliliter of the various extract concentrations were dropped into each labelled well. After that, the plates were incubated
anaerobically at 37
o
C for 24 hours. Antibacterial activity was determined by measuring the diameter of zones of inhibition (mm)
produced after 48 hours of incubation. The diameter of the zone of inhibition around each well was measured in millimeters. The
results were recorded and compared with standard values for antibiotic susceptibility testing.
A Negative control was filled with an antibiotic disc.
Determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)
Here, various concentrations of the extracts were obtained using double- fold serial dilution. Each dilution was assayed against the
test bacterial using tube dilution techniques. One milliliter of test organism was added into each dilution incubated anaerobically at
37
o
C for 24 hours. The MIC was defined as the lowest concentration able to inhibit any visible bacterial growth. This was
determined and recorded. (Shahidi-Bunjar, 2017).
Extraction
The powdered carrot (20g) leaf was percolated in ethanol (200 ml) in 11 capacity conical flask, stoppered and kept for two weeks
with intermittent shaking. The percolates were filtered with Whatman's No. 1 filter paper. The extracts were concentrated
at 40
0
C under reduced pressure using rotary evaporator (Rl-10). The same quantity of carrot was again percolated with distilled
water for one week and after filteration, the aqueous carrot extract was concentrated in hot oven at 40
o
C (Nwobu et al., 2016). The
concentrated extracts were labelled DCA (Daucus carota aqueous) and DCE (Daucus carota ethanol).
Phytochemical Analysis
Phytochemical analysis for qualitative detection of alkaloids, flavonoids, tannins and saponins was performed on the extracts as
described. (Trease and Evans, 2019).
Quantitative determination of the presence of phytochemicals
Alkaloids
Five milliliters (5 ml) of the sample was mixed with 96% ethanol-20% tetraoxosulphate (vi) acid (1:1). One milliliter (1 ml) of the
filtrate from the mixture was added to 5 ml of 60% H2SO4 and allowed to stand for 5 minutes, reading was taken at absorbance of
565 nm.
Glycosides
This was carried out using Buljet's reagent. One gram (1 g) of the fine powder of the sample was soaked in 10 ml of 70% alcohol
for 2 h and then filtered.The extract was then purified using lead acetate and disodium hydrogen tetraoxosulphate (vi), (Na2HPO4)
solution before the addition of freshly prepared Buljet's reagent. The absorbance was taken at 550 nm.
Flavonoids
Five millitres of the extract was mixed with 5 ml of dilute hydrochloric acid (HC1) and boiled for 30 minutes. The boiled extract
was allowed to cool and then filtered. One millitre (1 ml) of the filtrate was added to 5 ml of ethyl acetate and 5 ml of 1% ammonia
solution. The absorbance was taken at 420 nm.
Phenolics
Ten millitres (10 ml) of the sample was boiled with 50ml acetone for 15 minutes. Five millitres of the solution was pipette into a
50 ml flask. Then, 10 ml of distilled water was added. This was followed by the addition of 2 M NH
4
OH and 5ml of concentrated
amyl alcohol. The mixture was left for 30 minutes and absorbance was taken at 505 nm.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue VII, July 2025
www.ijltemas.in Page 297
Tannins
Ten millitres (10 ml) of the sample was pipette into 50 ml plastic bottle containing 50 ml of distilled water. This was shaked for 1
h on a mechanical shaker. The solution was filtered and 5 ml of the filtrate was mixed with 2 ml of FeCl
3
in 0.I NHCL. The
absorbance was read at 120 nm.
Steroids
The extract was eluted with normal NH
4
OH solution. Two millitres (2 ml) of the eluate was mixed 2 ml of chloroform in a test
tube. Three (3 ml) of ice cold acetic anhydride was added to the mixture and two drops of concentrated H
2
SO4 was continuously
added to the mixture and allowed to cool. The absorbance was taken at 420 nm.
Saponins
Five millitres (5 ml) of the sample was dissolved in aqueous methanol. Then, 0.25 ml of aliquot was taken for spectrophotometric
determination for total saponins at 544 nm.
III. Results
Table 1: Morphology characteristics of isolate from urine.
This table shows the results of the morphology characteristics of isolates from urine.
The isolates exhibited a raised elevation, except isolate 1A, which was flat.
The isolates exhibited an entire margin morphology, except isolate 1A and 8B, which had undulate margins, and isolate 3B, which
had a lobate margin.
The isolates exhibited a circular morphology form, except isolate 1A, 2B and 3B, which had irregular forms.
The colony forming unit count revealed significant growth for all isolates except isolate 2B and 6A.
The sizes of all isolates were small and they all had a growth rate of 24 hours.
Isolate Elevation Margin Size Form CFU Growth rate
1A Flat Undulate Small Irregular 10.8 24 hours
2A Raised Entire Small Circular 12.1 24 hours
2B Raised Entire Small Irregular 7.2 24 hours
3A Raised Lobate Small Circular 19.6 24 hours
3B Raised Entire Small Irregular 10.9 24 hours
6A Raised Entire Small Circular 4.2 24 hours
7A Raised Entire Small Circular 18.2 24 hours
8B Raised Undulate Small Circular 15.1 24 hours
Table 2: Biochemical Characteristics of the Isolates
This table shows the result of the biochemical characteristics of the isolates.
All isolates were Gram positive, with the exemption of isolate 2B, which was Gram negative.
The isolates exhibited a biochemical profile of catalase positive, oxidase negative, urease negative and hemolysis negative.
All isolates were citrate positive, with the exemption of isolate 2B, 6A, 7A, and 8B which tested negative.
Grams Catalase Oxidase Citrate Hemolysis Urease
Isolate Reaction Test Test Test Test Test
1A Positive Positive Negative Positive Negative Negative
2A Positive Positive Negative Positive Negative Negative
2B Negative Positive Negative Negative Negative Negative
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue VII, July 2025
www.ijltemas.in Page 298
3A Positive Positive Negative Positive Negative Negative
3B Positive Positive Negative Positive Negative Negative
6A Positive Positive Negative Negative Negative Negative
7A Positive Positive Negative Negative Negative Negative
8B Positive Positive Negative Negative Negative Negative
Table 3: Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Using Antibiotic Disc
The table shows the results of the negative control for the degree of susceptibility of Escherichia coli to various antibiotics
(Rifampicin, Cefuroxime, Ceftezole, Azithromycin, Amoxicillin, Ciprofloxacin, Erythromycin, Levofloxacin and Gentamycin.)
expressed in millimeters.
The antibiotics used in this study showed susceptibility against Escherichia coli with measurement of zone of inhibition.
Levofloxacin and showed moderate susceptibility against Escherichia coli with a zone of inhibition of 8 mm.
Amoxicillin, Ciprofloxacin, and Azithromycin showed moderate to high susceptibility against Escherichia coli with zone of
inhibition of 10 mm, 12 mm, and 14 mm, respectively.
Ceftezole showed low susceptibility against Escherichia coli with a zone of inhibition of 4 mm.
Erthromycin showed low susceptibility against Escherichia coli with a zone of inhibition of 2 mm.
Rifampicin showed moderate susceptibility against Escherichia coli with zone of inhibition of 10 mm.
Antimicrobial
Agent 1A 2A 2B 3A 3B 6A 7A 8B
Cefuroxine 2mm 2mm 2mm 2mm 10mm 2mm 4mm 10mm
Rifampicin 2mm 10mm 10mm 10mm 12mm 2mm 4mm 2mm
Ceftezole 10mm 2mm 4mm 8mm 5mm 2mm 4mm 2mm
Azithromycin 14mm 10mm 12mm 12mm 8mm 10mm 8mm 2mm
Amoxicillin 10mm 8mm 10mm 12mm 8mm 10mm 2mm 2mm
Ciprofloxacin 10mm 10mm 10mm 10mm 12mm 10mm 2mm 2mm
Erythromycin 8mm 2mm 2mm 8mm 4mm 4mm 10mm 2mm
Levofloxacin 8mm 8mm 10mm 8mm 8mm 8mm 10mm 2mm
Gentamycin 8mm 2mm 2mm 8mm 2mm 2mm 10mm 10mm
Table 4: Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Using Plant Extract, Daucus carota
Isolate 1A 2A 2B 3A 3B 6A 7A 8B
MIC 7 mm 5 mm 10 mm 10 mm 1 mm 8 mm 8 mm 1 mm
MIC: Microbial Inhibitory Concentration.
Table 5: Quantitative Phytochemical constituents of Carrot (Daucus carota) root extracts.
This table shows the natural constituents of carrot. It shows that carrot consists of alkaloids, flavonoids, saponins, tannins, phenolic,
resins, steroids and glycosides.
DCA: Daucus carota Aqueous,
DCE: Daucus carota ethanol.
+: present,
-: absent.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue VII, July 2025
www.ijltemas.in Page 299
The phytochemical constituents of Carrot (Daucus carota) extracts Aqueous showed positive to all the phytochemicals used in this
study. But on the other hand Daucus carota ethanol showed positive to all the phytochemicals used in this study except alkaloid,
tannins and resins.
Phytochemicals DCA DCE
Alkaloids ++ -
Flavonoids + +
Saponins ++ +
Tannins ++ -
Phenolics ++ +
Resins + -
Steroids + ++
Glycosides + +
IV. Discussion, Conclusion, Recommendation and Contribution to Science
Discussion
In the present study, it showed that carrot (Daucus carota) had antibacterial activity against the organism Escherichia coli which is
a common bacteria isolated from urine. Escherichia coli was susceptible to the carrot sample at a uniform concentration of 100%
of the carrot.
Among the organisms tested, Escherichia coli exhibited a zone of inhibition with a diameter of 10 mm, indicating a considerable
level of susceptibility to carrot. This finding aligns with previous studies that have reported the antibacterial potential of carrot
against Escherichia coli (Demuth et al., 2020). The ability of carrot to inhibit the growth of Escherichia coli may be attributed to
its various components, including hydrogen peroxide, low pH, and osmolality, which create an unfavorable environment for
bacterial growth (Henkel, 2021).
However, it is important to note that the antibacterial activity of carrot can be influenced by various factors, including its
geographical origin, floral source, and processing methods, which may explain the discrepancy in results between studies
(Schwebke et al., 2021).
For the phytochemical constituents of Daucus carota Aqueous extracts showed positive to all the phytochemicals used in this study.
But on the other hand Daucus carota ethanol showed positive to all the phytochemicals used in this study except alkaloid, tannins,
and resins.
Flavonoids are prominent antioxidants, which protect the body from oxidative stress by scavenging free radicals. Carrot contains
flavonoids, which may help in reducing oxidative damage and inflammation. According to research conducted by Ghasemzadeh et
al. (2016), the high flavonoid content in carrot contributes to its antioxidant potential, making it effective in preventing chronic
diseases associated with oxidative stress. Tannins, recognized for their astringent and antioxidant properties, are present in carrot.
They may contribute to its ability to prevent microbial growth and enhance wound healing. (Adegboye et al., 2019). Research
showed that the tannin content in carrot could inhibit the growth of various pathogens, supporting its traditional use in treating
infections.
Conclusion
The findings suggest that carrot holds promise as a natural alternative for the treatment of bacterial infections, offering advantages
such as widespread availability, cost-effectiveness, and potentially reduced antibiotic resistance development.
Recommendation
In this study, I successfully utilized Daucus carota as an antimicrobial agent to inhibit Escherichia coli isolated from urine.
Therefore, I recommend that this work should be furthered to find out the active ingredients of Daucus carota that is responsible
for the inhibition.
References
1.
Aggarwal, N., Leslie, S. (2024). Escherichia coli in the urinary tract. Encyclopedia of medicine,5(2), 111-5.
2.
Akhtar, S., Rauf, A., Imran, M. (2019). Dietary and health promoting perspective of carrot polyphenol. Trends in food
science technology, 66, 36-47.
3.
Anger, J., Ackerman, L. (2019). Urinary tract infections. International journal of urology, 202, 282-289.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue VII, July 2025
www.ijltemas.in Page 300
4.
Aohajer, M., Musher, D. (2018). Clinical significance of Staphylococcus aureus. Scandinavian journal of infectious
diseases, 45, 688-95.
5.
Behzadi, P., Aghapour, R., Akbari, C. (2017). Effect of Salmonella species on urinary tract. Encyclopedia of medicine,
15, 3-4.
6.
Carlsson, S., Wiklund, P., Engstrand, L. (2019). Bacterial growth in urine. British Journal of experimental pathology, 69,
759-70.
7.
Carolina, A., Benita., Martinez, G. (2017). Pytochemical properties of Daucus carota L. post harvest biological technology,
127, 99-104.
8.
Cortes, C., Esteve, M., Frigola, A. (2021). Changes in carotenoids. European food research technology, 221, 125-131.
9.
Cornish, J., Lecamwahsam, J., Harrison, G. (2018). Host defense mechanisms in the urinary tract. Journal of clinical
urology, 81, 83-6.
10.
Elvira, l., Garcia, J. (2019). Nutritional importance of carotenoids and their antioxidant properties. Journal of clinical
medicine, 8, 229.
11.
Ipe, D., Horton, E., Utett, G. (2018). Strategies of microbes for persistence in urine. Front cell infection microbbiology,
26, 11-6.
12.
Kochiashuili, D., Khuskivadze, A. (2022). Prevention and treatment of urinary tract infection. Journal of clinical urology,
190, 1981-1989.
13.
Kucheria, R., Dasgupta, P., Sacks, S. (2021). New surfacing urinary tract infections. Postgraduate medical jounal, 952,
83-6.
14.
Lala, V., Leslie, W., Minter, D. (2018). Disruption of the layer of mucus. British journal of molecular biology, 474, 49-
53.
15.
May, M., Schostak, M., Lebentrau, S. (2017). Recurrent urinary tract infections.Journal of medical microbiology, 15, 3-4.
16.
Petrin, F., Hartman, L., Dubios, C. (2017). Morphological and biochemicalcharacteristics of Daucus carota L. Journal of
plant pathology, 245, 737-747.
17.
Phan, G., Remaut, H., Wang, T., Allen, W. (2017). Pathogenesis of urinary tract infection. Journal of molecular biology,
474, 49-53.
18.
Subashchandrabose, S., Mobley, H. (2019). virulence and fitness determinants of uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Journal
of microbiological spectrum, 3, 235-261.
19.
Wang, L., Staner, G. (2022). Anthocyannins and their role in the prevention of cancer. Journal of medical health, 269,
281-290.
20.
Wellenberg, L., Johanssan, E., Olson, M. (2017). Antimicrobial activity of Daucus carota L. Journal of clinical and food
microbiology, 5, 60.