INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue VII, July 2025
www.ijltemas.in Page 409
Effect of Salinity on Six Genotypes of Avena Sativa during
Germination and Seedling Growth
Niti Kushwaha*
1
, Shiva Singh
1
, Somya Goswami
1
, Sharat Srivastava
2
, Harsh Kumar Garg
2
1
Department of Botany, Dayanand Vedic College, Orai, India
2
Department of Chemistry, Dayanand Vedic College, Orai, India
*Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1407000048
Abstract: Avena sativa is a promising crop valued for its nutritional benefits, adaptability and rapid growth. The rapidly increasing
global salinisation threatens more than 10% of arable land, lowering the average yield of major crops. To examine the impact of
salinity on seed germination and seedling development in six Avena genotypes (JHO Kent, JHO 822, JHO 851, JHO 2009-1, JHO
2010-1, and JHO 2012-2) subjected to different salinity levels (EC 4, EC 8, EC 12, EC 16 dS/m), including distilled water. The
seeds were germinated in petri plates. The germination and seedling vigour were significantly affected by increasing salinity, with
notable declines observed at EC 12 and EC 16. Among the genotypes, JHO 822 and JHO 2009-1 displayed the highest salinity
tolerance. JHO 822 achieved 90% germination in distilled water at EC 12 and exhibited superior radicle (19 cm) and plumule (20.76
cm) lengths. Similarly, JHO 2009-1 retained 85% germination at EC 16 and exhibited strong seedling growth, with maximum
radicle and plumule lengths. JHO Kent, JHO 851, and JHO 2012-2 showed moderate salinity tolerance, attaining germination rates
above 75% at EC 16 but with reduced seedling growth metrics. In contrast, JHO 2010-1 demonstrated the lowest resilience, with
germination declining to 40% and minimal radicle and plumule development at EC 16. Across all genotypes, lower salinity levels
(EC 4 and EC 8) supported optimal germination and growth. Thus, the study highlights substantial genotypic variability in salinity
tolerance, with JHO 822 and JHO 2009-1 emerging as promising genotypes for cultivation in saline environments.
Keywords: Avena sativa, salinity, abiotic stress, germination, seedling vigour
I. Introduction
Healthy soil is the lifeblood of plant growth. It provides a stable anchor for roots, supplies essential nutrients, and facilitates the
exchange of water and air. Soil salinity is a major abiotic threat to agriculture worldwide, estimating that more than 6% of the
world’s total land area is affected by salinity. Saline-sodic soils in India occupy approximately 7% of the total land area (1 billion
ha) and 20% of the irrigated arable land in arid and semi-arid regions. This area is increasing (Agarwal et al. 2013). This causes
osmotic stress, ionic toxicity and oxidative stress, affecting beneficial soil microbes, seed germination, seedling establishment,
water uptake, metabolic function and overall crop yield. Seed germination is considered a key stage in the plant's life cycle and is
affected by many ecological factors such as temperature, drought, salt stress, light and soil pH. Salinity impacts germination through
osmotic stress, ion-specific effects, and oxidative stress, reducing germination rates and prolonged germination times (Malaviya
et.al., 2019). Effects of salinity are categorised as primary and secondary. Primary effects include metabolic disruption and inhibited
growth and development, while secondary effects of salinity are nutrient deficiency and osmotic dehydration. By increasing external
osmotic potential, salinity reduces water uptake during imbibition. Approximately 99% of the world’s plant species are sensitive to
even low salinity levels (ECe < 4 dS m⁻¹). Under moderate salinity conditions (EC 4–8 dS m⁻¹), the average yield of major
glycophytic crops decreases by 5080%. It was observed that tolerance at germination, early seedling, and vegetative growth stages
are of great importance in determining the ultimate tolerance of the crop. Notable advancements have been achieved in breeding
salt-tolerant green vegetables and crops. However, forage species, particularly those derived from wild germplasm, have more
promising solutions for the reclamation of soil. These species carry genes that provide resistance to both biotic and abiotic stresses.
Plants react to salinity through two mechanisms: a reduction in external water potential caused by elevated soil salt levels and the
ongoing uptake and accumulation of ions within their tissues. This results in the mortality of sensitive species caused by nutrient
deficiency and osmotic dehydration. Salinity adversely impacts seed germination and plant growth, thereby diminishing crop yield.
The tolerance of a crop during germination, early seedling, and vegetative growth stages is crucial for assessing species tolerance.
Oats (Avena sativa L.), belonging to the family Gramineae (Poaceae), hold significance as they rank sixth in global cereal production
and are extensively cultivated for food, feed, and fodder. The genus includes diploid, tetraploid, and hexaploid species with a basic
chromosome number of X = 7 (Kushwaha et al., 2003). Cultivated oats are allohexaploids (2n = 6x = 42) derived from three
ancestral diploid Avena genomes (A, C, and D) (Bennet and Leitch, 1995). In India, oats are grown on approximately 0.5 million
hectares, while the global cultivation area spans 9 million hectares annually for grain, fodder, and straw production (Sánchez-Martín
et al., 2014). The crop's global importance is rising due to its ease of cultivation and profitability. Oats are a favoured winter cereal
fodder crop in northwestern and central India and are increasingly grown in eastern and southern regions. They yield palatable and
nutritious forage and are gaining popularity as a healthy food source because of their high dietary fibre content, particularly beta-
glucan (Villaluenga and Penas, 2017). Because of their high beta-glucan content, a soluble fibre that lowers cholesterol, oats are
also known to have positive effects on diabetes management (Singh et al., 2003). While moderately tolerant to drought, cold, and
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue VII, July 2025
www.ijltemas.in Page 410
mineral deficiencies, oats are more sensitive to salt stress than cereals like barley and wheat. Nevertheless, they can grow in diverse
soil types and exhibit substantial saline-alkali tolerance The study aims to identify tolerant and susceptible oat genotypes by
examining their germination ability, and seedling traits under varying levels of salinity. This evaluation is crucial for selecting
genotypes that can be used in breeding programs to develop oat varieties suitable for salinity-affected areas.
II. Material and Methods
Seeds of six genotypes of oat were procured from ICAR-Indian Grassland & Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi.
Screening for germination and seedling vigour in vitro
Five different electrical conductivity (EC) treatments, including control, were given in six genotypes: JHO2009-1, JHO2010-1,
JHO2012-2, JHO Kent, JHO822, and JHO851. To induce salinity stress during germination, solutions with varying levels of
electrical conductivity (4, 8, 12, 16 dS/m) were prepared by mixing NaCl, MgCl₂, CaSO₄, and Na₂SO₄ salts in varying quantities in
distilled water (Dheeravathu et. al., 2018). Twenty seeds per genotype for every treatment were placed on sterilised filter paper in
petri dishes. For control sets, the filter papers were soaked with distilled water (DW), while for saline treatments, soaking was done
with saline water with electrical conductivity (EC) of EC4, EC8, EC12, and EC16 dS/m. Data on germination were recorded 7 days
after soaking, and the total number of germinated seeds with radicle and plumule growth was recorded. Radicle and plumule lengths
were recorded on 3 seedlings in each set on the 15th day to measure seedling growth.
Data Analysis
Salinity intensity index (SII) was determined using the formula SII = 1 - XSS/XNS, where XSS and XNS represent the average
values for all accessions in salinity-stressed (SS) and non-stressed (NS) conditions, respectively, as (Fisher and Maurer,1978).
The salt susceptibility index (SSI) was calculated using the formula SSI = (1 - YSS/YNS)/SII, where YSS and YNS are the mean
values for a specific accession under stressed and non-stressed conditions, respectively, (Bayuelo-Jiménez et al. 2002).
Based on the SSI values, genotypes were categorised as susceptible, tolerant, or highly tolerant, with lower SSI values indicating
greater tolerance. Statistical analyses, including standard deviation calculations, Student’s t-tests, two-factor analysis of variance,
and regression analyses, were performed using the MS Excel software.
III. Results and Discussion
Germination% was mainly driven by genetic differences in this particular set of data. Even at higher salinity (EC12, EC16),
genotypes JHO 2009-1 and JHO 851 still showed high germination. Radicle length was strongly inhibited by higher salinity for all
genotypes (i.e., the “salinity effect” dwarfed the “genotype effect”). Radicle length does differ significantly across salinity levels
(DW > EC4 > EC8 > EC12 > EC16), while differences among genotypes are not large enough. Plumule length was impacted
significantly by both genotype and salinity. Genotypes JHO 851 and JHO 822 consistently produced longer shoots, but all
genotypes tended to show shorter shoots as salinity went up. As salinity increases, plumule length generally decreases (with a few
exceptions). Meanwhile, genotypes JHO 851, and JHO 822 maintain longer shoots overall than JHO 2010-1.
Table 1- Mean, SII and SSI in Avena sativa genotypes at different salinity levels:
Fig. 1-
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue VII, July 2025
www.ijltemas.in Page 411
Fig. 2-
Fig. 3-
Fig. 4-
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue VII, July 2025
www.ijltemas.in Page 412
Our findings revealed significant genotypic differences in salinity tolerance among the tested oat genotypes. While certain
genotypes demonstrated resilience during the germination stage (JHO 2009-1 and JHO 851), others exhibited tolerance at the
seedling stage (JHO 822). This dual-stage variability underscores the importance of selecting genotypes based on specific growth
phases when developing salt-tolerant varieties having negative SSI values, indicating their salinity-tolerant nature (Roy et. al.,
2021).
Consistent with previous studies (Akbarimoghaddam et al., 2011; Kumawat et al., 2022), our data showed a reduction in
germination rates as salinity levels increased. High salinity exerts detrimental effects on germination due to ion toxicity, which
results from simultaneous increases in anions and cations in the surrounding solution. This imbalance disrupts critical processes
like water imbibition and enzyme activation, reducing germination efficiency.
Table 2- Germination%, radicle and plumule length at different levels of salinity in Avena sativa genotypes:
Fig. 5-
Higher salinity also significantly impacted seedling growth by interfering with the plant's ability to absorb essential nutrients. This
aligns with findings by Chauhan et al. (2016) and Veeral et al. (2018), which suggest that high salt concentrations in the soil solution
inhibit the uptake of crucial ions such as potassium and calcium. The reduction in nutrient availability leads to stunted growth and
diminished vigour, particularly in susceptible genotypes.
Studies (Chauhan et al., 2016; Devi et al., 2018) emphasise that plant expansionincluding radicle and plumule elongationis a
vital indicator of salt tolerance. In our study, genotypes like JHO 851 maintained relatively longer radicle and plumule lengths
under salinity stress, highlighting their adaptive mechanisms to mitigate ion toxicity and osmotic stress. These traits suggest the
potential of JHO 851 for breeding salt-tolerant oat varieties.
IV. Conclusion
The variability in salinity tolerance across different genotypes and developmental stages demonstrates the complex interaction
between genetic and environmental factors. Targeting specific traits, such as germination efficiency and seedling elongation under
stress, can aid in selecting and breeding salt-tolerant oat genotypes. These findings contribute to sustainable agricultural practices
in saline-affected regions.
Acknowledgement
Authors are thankful to ICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi for providing the seeds.
References
1. Agarwal, P. K., Shukla, P. S., Gupta, K., & Jha, B. (2013). Bioengineering for salinity tolerance in plants: State of art.
Molecular Biotechnology, 54, 102123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-012-9538-3
2. Akbarimoghaddam, H., Galavi, M., Ghanbari, A., & Panjehkeh, N. (2011). Salinity effects on seed germination and
seedling growth of bread wheat cultivars. Trakia Journal of Sciences, 9(1), 4350.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue VII, July 2025
www.ijltemas.in Page 413
3. Bayuelo-Jiménez, J. S., Craig, R., & Lynch, J. P. (2002). Salinity tolerance of Phaseolus species during germination and
early seedling growth. Crop Science, 42, 15841594.
4. Bennett, M. D., & Leitch, I. J. (1995). Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms. Annals of Botany, 76, 113176.
https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1995.1085
5. Chauhan, A. N., Nidhi, R., Deepak, K., Ashok, K., & Chaudhry, A. K. (2016). Effect of different salt concentrations on
seed germination and seedling growth of different varieties of oat (Avena sativa L.). International Journal of Information
Research and Review, 3(7), 26272632.
6. Devi, S., Phogat, D. S., Satpal, & Goyal, V. (2019). Responses of oat (Avena sativa L.) genotypes under salt stress.
International Journal of Current Science, 7(3), 734737.
7. Fisher, R. A., & Maurer, R. (1978). Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars I. Grain yield responses. Australian
Journal of Agricultural Research, 29, 897912.
8. Kumawat, S., Kumawat, R., Kumawat, K. R., Gothwal, D. K., & Yadav, S. (2022). Explore salt-tolerant fenugreek
genotypes seedlings using salt tolerance index. The Pharma Innovation Journal, 11(4 Suppl), 19251931.
9. Kushwaha, N., Dwivedi, K., Choubey, R. N., Malaviya, D. R., Roy, A. K., Anand, A., Baig, M. J., & Kaushal, P. (2002).
Germination and seedling vigour of grasses under different levels of salinity. In National Symposium on Grassland and
Fodder Research in New Millennium (pp. 2627).
10. Malaviya, D. R., Roy, A. K., Anand, A., Choubey, R. N., Baig, M. J., Dwivedi, K., Kushwaha, N., & Kaushal, P. (2019).
Salinity tolerance of Panicum maximum genotypes for germination and seedling growth. Range Management and
Agroforestry, 40(2), 227235.
11. Roy, A. K., Malaviya, D. R., Anand, A., Choubey, R. N., Baig, M. J., Dwivedi, K., & Kaushal, P. (2021). Salinity tolerance
of Avena sativa fodder genotypes (Tolerancia de genotipos de avena forrajera a la salinidad). Tropical GrasslandsForrajes
Tropicales, 9(1), 109119.
12. Sánchez-Martín, P. L., Chen, M. K., Pessarakli, M., Hill, H. J., Gore, M. A., & Jenks, M. A. (2014). Effects of temperature
and salinity on germination of non-pelleted and pelleted guayule (Parthenium argentatum A. Gray) seeds. Industrial Crops
and Products, 55, 9096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.02.018
13. Seva Nayak, D., Tyagi, V. C., Gupta, C. K., & Antony, E. (2018). Manual on plant stress physiology. ICAR-Indian
Grassland and Fodder Research Institute.
14. Singh, C., Singh, P., & Singh, R. (2003). Modern techniques of raising field crops (2nd ed., pp. 429436). Oxford and
IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd.
15. Veeral, K. M. D., Sangameshwari, P., & Kalaimathi, P. (2018). Laboratory studies on the effects of different salt
concentrations on seed germination. Open Access Journal of Agricultural Research, 3(1).
https://doi.org/10.23880/OAJAR-16000158
16. Villaluenga, C., & Peñas, E. (2017). Health benefits of oats: Current evidence and molecular mechanism. Current Opinion
in Food Science, 14, 2631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2017.01.004