INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue VIII, August 2025
www.ijltemas.in Page 932
The scientific management theory was introduced by Frederick Taylor (1911) as it emphasizes the use of scientific method in
analysing job to determine the most efficient method. He went against the rule of thumb in having proper job allocation. This will
help to yield efficiency as the work processes must be well analysed to give room for productivity. (Atakpa, 2022). Scientific
theory and Lean management theory are both related as they both focus on efficiency and productivity leading to the reduction of
waste. This further proves that they both have the same foundational principles. (Selimovic et al,2020). He equally introduced
specialization by dividing work into individual task to be performed in an individual’s specialised area.
On the other hand, the Total Quality Management focuses on continuous improvement, customer satisfaction and employees’
engagement. It also emphasizes following accurate process approach in business so as to improve the products. (Aichouni,2023).
Both the lean management theory and TQM agree that continuous improvement is important for the growth of an organisation.
This is what is referred to as Kaizen in Lean management. Equally, both emphasized on customer satisfaction which is key in
management. The lean management sees this as value which should be seen from the customer’s perspective The total quality
management uses several tools such as Pareto analysis, Fishbone diagram,control chart, flow chart, brainstorming, benchmarking,
quality function deployment e.tc. All these are used to collect data and solve problems which will lead to the improvement of
organisation performance.
Empirical Review
Singh et al. (2025) examined the impact of lean management practices in Horizon Addis Tire Manufacturing PLC. The study
employed a cross-sectional survey design and used a five-point Likert scale questionnaire to collect primary data. Factor analysis,
multiple regression, and fuzzy set qualitative comparative analyses were utilized to test their hypotheses. The study identified
significant relationships between lean practices, operational performance, and organizational performance, demonstrating how
lean management can influence organizational outcomes at the operational level.
William et al. (2023) investigated lean management and organizational performance in selected manufacturing firms in Akwa
Ibom State, Nigeria. The researchers adopted a survey research design and applied the census technique to gather data from 59
respondents across top, middle, and lower management levels. Data analysis was conducted using ordinal logistic regression. The
findings revealed that lean management dimensions significantly influenced organizational performance, particularly through
value stream mapping and waste elimination.
Schwantz et al. (2023) explored the relationship between lean practices and organizational performance in a military organization.
Using a quantitative approach and questionnaires as the primary data source, the researchers collected 116 responses. Structural
Equation Modelling (SEM) was applied for analysis. The results showed that lean practices such as waste elimination, continuous
improvement, leadership support, employee involvement, education and training, long-term thinking, quality focus, and systemic
vision had positive impacts on organizational performance.
Khan et al. (2023) conducted a literature review to investigate the application of lean practices in higher education institutions.
Following the PRISMA protocol, the study reviewed journal publications from 2019 to 2023. The findings indicated that 36% of
the reviewed studies were analytical, while 64% implemented lean approaches. Key metrics examined included curriculum
review, teaching methodology, administration, student satisfaction, lean waste identification, and barriers to implementation. The
review concluded that lean techniques have been successfully applied in higher education, resulting in streamlined processes,
reduced waste, and improved satisfaction levels for both staff and students.
De Souza Lima (2023) examined sustainability practices in public universities using lean evaluation for administrative processes.
Using Fluminense University in Brazil as a case study, the research demonstrated that the elimination of waste in administrative
processes saved approximately 444,754 sheets of paper, underscoring the potential of lean methods to enhance efficiency and
sustainability.
Mulyana et al. (2023) studied the identification and prioritization of waste in higher education institutions, proposing a framework
for waste management. The study employed observation and literature review to identify waste, followed by questionnaires
administered to students, lecturers, and educational staff. Using a fuzzy method, the researchers prioritized 59 types of waste,
including overproduction, inventory, defects, over-processing, waiting, motion, transportation, and underutilized talent. The study
concluded by emphasizing the need for higher education institutions to prioritize waste reduction.
Klein et al. (2022) examined the influence of lean practices on process effectiveness within a Brazilian public institution. From a
sample of 997 administrative staff, data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses,
and multiple regression. The results indicated that continuous improvement, long-term thinking, leadership support, and focus on
the final user positively influenced process effectiveness, thereby enhancing organizational performance.
Bak (2021) investigated lean management in healthcare units, focusing on objectives, processes, and implementation effects. Case
studies were conducted in the EMC Regional Health Center in Rubin and the Regional Center of Nephrology in Szczecinek,
Poland. Using comparative analysis and content analysis of documentation, the findings revealed that lean implementation
yielded benefits such as flexibility, efficiency in key processes, reduced resource waste, and improved service quality from
patients’ perspectives.