INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue X, October 2025
www.ijltemas.in Page 195
As such, decentralization in Mozambique emerged in a context of transition from a socialist regime to multiparty democracy. It
was linked to the strengthening of democracy and the greater involvement of new actors, such as civil society, in participatory
governance practices, removing the dominance of the public sphere by the centralized state in the provision of public services
(Ombe and Catique, 2017).
However, Law 2/97 established the legal framework for the creation of the first 33 local authorities and the holding of the first
local elections in Mozambique's history. Similarly, [...] this meant, on the one hand, that the national territory would be gradually
autonomous based on a set of necessary prerequisites, in terms of local socioeconomic conditions, infrastructure, resources, etc.,
and, on the other, that the central government would gradually transfer functions and responsibilities to decentralized entities,
particularly in matters of education, health, and transportation (Forquilha et al., 2018).
Operationalization of Health Service Transfers to Local Councils
Process of operationalizing the transfer of Health Services
Once the legal framework for transferring health services to municipalities has been created, knowledge of the legal reasons for
this constitutes gray literature, and other reasons should be listed, as emphasized by Forquilha et al. (2018), citing Notícias, 2015.
In this regard, the central government's discourse attributes the slowness in transferring functions and powers to local authorities
to the lack of technical, material, and financial resources and capacity on the part of the municipalities requesting the transfer of
these services. For municipalities, particularly those under the management of the Democratic Movement of Mozambique
(MDM) (especially the municipality of Beira), the slowness and/or "hesitation" in transferring functions and powers is explained
by a mere "political maneuver" on the part of the central government, aimed at hindering the work of municipalities.
In any case, the aforementioned argument that municipalities lack technical, material, and financial resources and capabilities as
the reason for the slow transfer process is contradictory, since decentralization implies that the central government not only
transfers functions and powers, but also resources (human, material, financial, etc.). In the health sector, for example, transferring
functions and powers to municipalities implies that the government also transfers the necessary resources (human, material,
financial, etc.) so that municipalities can perform their role adequately (Forquilha et al., 2018).
In fact, with the decentralization process, specifically the creation of State Representation Councils and Provincial Executive
Councils, the transfer of health services was almost immediate, as mentioned above, with the transfer of services related to
secondary, tertiary, and quaternary care to State Representation Councils and primary care to Provincial Executive Councils, thus
leaving local authorities at the mercy of political maneuvering.
To this end, Matsinhe & Namburete (2019) note that in the 1990s, Mozambique underwent significant political transformations,
with the democratic transition and the adoption of a new Constitution, which paved the way for the creation of the National
Health System (SNS) […] reestablishing the conditions for the provision of health services within a more complex framework,
which includes the decentralization process linked to territorial reorganization and the introduction of Municipal Authorities.
According to Ezekwesili et al. (2009), a strategy with clear criteria and methodologies for transferring state functions to
municipalities has not yet been fully developed, including the transfer or creation of the financial, human, and material resources
necessary to ensure the viability of services once they are taken over by municipalities. This situation is further aggravated by
Mozambique's tendency toward a highly centralized political system and the lack of a vehicle for expressing the challenges facing
municipalities in a coordinated manner, as well as the limited role municipalities have to play in national debates on public sector
reform and poverty reduction, among other issues.
From the above, it is also clear that there is an intrinsic debate about the technical will to transfer services to decentralized bodies,
such as Municipalities, on the one hand, at the level of the health sector through the Ministry of Health (MISAU), through the
Strategic Plan for the Health Sector 2014-2019, drawn up after the law that established local authorities, assumes effective
decentralization as an action to strengthen the health system in Mozambique by bringing services closer to the user and an
indispensable condition for improving the provision of quality services (MISAU, 2014, cited by Mbofana, 2018), on the other
hand, other currents that emanate from the limited role that municipalities have to play in national debates on public sector reform
and poverty, among others.
Types of Health Service Decentralization
Health has its own specificities due to the nature of its activity. It is in this sense that, according to Zoon et al. (2017), cited by
Mbofana (2018), they list four types of health service decentralization. It is important to observe the four types of health service
decentralization:
a) Decentralization when the authority shifts to provincial or district offices;
b) Devolution when the shift is to provincial or municipal governments;
c) Delegation when semi-autonomous agencies receive new powers; and
d) Privatization when ownership is granted to private entities.
Therefore, the devolution related to the shift to provincial or municipal governments still seems to be a pipe dream, measured by
the number of municipalities to which services have been transferred.
Since the early 2000s, municipalization has been characterized by the introduction of rules that have evolved in ways that are
limited by the institutional framework that initially shaped a decentralization process that favors the affirmation of municipal
government dependence (Simione et al., 2018).
Relationships between different government entities tend to occur within a deficient framework that does not favor the
harmonization of plans and actions, nor the adjustment of public policy management processes. Thus, the possibility of jointly
evaluating certain results, better monitoring and legitimizing shared actions, and assessing the impacts of policies implemented
within the framework of competing competencies is reduced (Simione et al., 2018).
The Central Government's Action in Decentralizing Health Services to Local Authorities
According to Simione et al. (2018), regarding public policies, the Central Government prioritizes coordination through the OLE
(provincial and district governments) and their agencies, rather than through municipalities. Since public policies in Mozambique
are mostly pre-established or adopted through programs developed nationwide by the central government and operationalized
through the OLE, the latter wield significant political influence, as they play an important role in ensuring compliance with
nationally established goals, which tends to reduce the autonomy of municipalities in managing national policies.
Clearly, the aforementioned approach can significantly reduce the willingness of municipalities to act accordingly so that services
can be effectively transferred, with all the attendant constraints, including the necessary financial, human, and material resources.