INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue X, October 2025
www.ijltemas.in Page 254
Utilisation of Rural Manpower for the Mahatma Gandhi National
Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS): A Study in
Anantapur District, Andhra Pradesh
G.M. Vijayakumar Reddy., Prof. M. Muninarayanappa
Sri Krishnadevaraya University, India
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1410000035
Abstract: The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGS) stands as a cornerstone of India's
social security architecture, aiming to enhance livelihood security in rural areas by providing at least 100 days of wage
employment per household. This paper examines the utilisation of rural manpower under MGNREGS in Anantapur district of
Andhra Pradesh, a region characterised by its semi-arid climate, recurrent droughts, and a high dependence on rain-fed
agriculture. Through a qualitative analysis of secondary data from government reports and a review of existing literature, this
study assesses the performance of the scheme in terms of employment generation, wage distribution, and asset creation. It finds
that MGNREGS has been a critical lifeline for rural labour in Anantapur, significantly absorbing surplus agricultural labour,
particularly during lean seasons and drought years. However, the study also identifies persistent challenges, including delays in
wage payments, uneven distribution of person-days, and questions regarding the durability of created assets. The paper concludes
that while MGNREGS has been effectively utilised as a safety net, its potential as a transformative tool for sustainable rural
development in drought-prone regions like Anantapur requires strengthened implementation, greater focus on water conservation
works, and better convergence with other developmental programmes.
Keywords: MGNREGS, Rural Employment, Manpower Utilisation, Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh, Drought, Rural Development,
Social Security.
I. Introduction
The structural transformation of rural economies in developing nations often involves addressing the twin challenges of
underemployment and poverty. In India, the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA), later renamed the Mahatma
Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), was enacted in 2005 with the primary objective of enhancing
livelihood security in rural areas by providing at least 100 days of guaranteed wage employment in a financial year to every
household whose adult members volunteer to do unskilled manual work (Ministry of Rural Development, 2005).
The scheme is not merely an employment programme but a rights-based legislation that aims to strengthen the livelihood resource
base of the rural poor, create productive assets, and empower rural communities, especially women, Scheduled Castes (SCs), and
Scheduled Tribes (STs). The utilisation of rural manpower under this scheme is a critical indicator of its effectiveness in reaching
its intended beneficiaries and mitigating agrarian distress.
Anantapur district in Andhra Pradesh presents a compelling case for such a study. It is one of the most drought-prone districts in
India, with scanty and erratic rainfall leading to frequent crop failures (Reddy, 2018). The agrarian economy, heavily reliant on
groundnut cultivation, is highly vulnerable, resulting in widespread underemployment, high migration, and endemic poverty. In
this context, MGNREGS emerges as a vital source of alternative income and a mechanism for stabilising rural wages.
This paper aims to analyse the utilisation of rural manpower for MGNREGS in Anantapur District. It seeks to:
1. Examine the trends in employment generation and person-day creation under MGNREGS.
2. Analyse the participation of different social groups (SC, ST, Women) in the workforce.
3. Assess the type of assets created and their relevance to the local ecology.
4. Identify the key challenges in the effective utilisation of manpower under the scheme.
II. Review of Literature
A substantial body of literature exists on MGNREGS, evaluating its impact from various angles. Dreze and Khera (2009)
highlighted its success in curbing famine and reducing distress migration in Rajasthan. They emphasised its role as a social safety
net. Studies by Liu and Barrett (2013) found that the scheme contributed to increasing rural wages, particularly for female
agricultural labourers, thereby improving their bargaining power.
However, critiques have also been prominent. Several studies, including one by the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG,
2013), have pointed to issues of corruption, inefficiency in implementation, and the creation of non-durable assets. Chakraborty
(2007) argued that while the scheme provided employment, its impact on creating a sustainable rural infrastructure was limited
due to poor technical planning and a lack of maintenance.