INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XI, November 2025  
"Towards GDP to GEP-Centric Model: A Proposed GEP Index  
Framework and Its Application in Haryana"  
Ms. Arti Kumari, Dr. Laita Dhingra, Dr. Nisha Singh  
Assistant Professor, DAVCC Faridabad  
Received: 18 November 2025; Accepted: 23 November 2025; Published: 29 November 2025  
ABSTRACT:  
In the coming years, India’s developmental narrative is poised for a fundamental shiftfrom a traditional Gross  
Domestic Product (GDP)-driven model toward a more inclusive and empowerment-based framework of  
progress. This emerging paradigm is increasingly reflected in national policy discourse and statements by the  
Prime Minister, who emphasizes the need for a development approach centered on the Gross Empowerment of  
People (GEP) rather than solely on economic output. The concept of GEP underscores a multidimensional  
understanding of development that includes economic, social, political, digital, and cultural empowerment,  
moving beyond conventional growth metrics to focus on the real capabilities, freedoms, and dignity of  
individuals.  
This research paper investigates the theoretical foundations and practical significance of the GEP model as a  
guiding principle in India’s evolving development strategy. Recognizing the complexity of measuring  
empowerment, the study proposes a comprehensive and context-sensitive GEP Index, designed to capture the  
multidimensional nature of empowerment within India’s unique socio-political landscape.  
The research applies this proposed GEP Index to a detailed case study of the state of Haryana. Haryana presents  
a compelling case for analysis due to its paradoxical developmental profile: the state boasts one of the highest  
per capita incomes and robust industrial growth rates nationally, yet it continues to grapple with persistent social  
challenges, including gender disparities, high dropout rates in education, and significant rural-urban inequalities.  
These contradictions make Haryana an ideal laboratory to test the efficacy of the GEP Index in revealing the  
nuanced dimensions of empowerment that traditional economic indicators may obscure.  
Using a composite methodology that integrates quantitative data from government reports, surveys, and indices,  
alongside qualitative assessments of policy impacts, the study evaluates Haryana’s performance across five key  
dimensions of the GEP Indexeconomic empowerment, social empowerment, political participation, digital  
inclusion, and psychological and cultural empowerment. The findings highlight areas of strength, such as  
economic and digital empowerment, alongside critical gaps in social and cultural dimensions, particularly related  
to gender equality and educational access.  
The study concludes by discussing the implications of adopting a GEP-centric development framework for  
policymakers, emphasizing how such an approach can help bridge the gap between economic growth and  
genuine human development. It argues that the GEP Index offers a more holistic and equitable alternative to  
GDP, enabling governments to design targeted interventions that foster inclusive empowerment. Ultimately, this  
research contributes to the growing global and Indian discourse on redefining progress by offering a practical,  
measurable, and policy-relevant empowerment framework. It demonstrates that while Haryana exemplifies some  
of India’s economic successes, true development must be measured by the extent to which its people are  
empowered to participate fully in society and shape their own futures.  
Key Words: Gross Empowerment of People (GEP), GEP Index, Multidimensional Empowerment, case study  
of Haryana, Beyond GDP  
Page 1  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XI, November 2025  
INTRODUCTION  
The conventional understanding of development has long been dominated by economic indicators, particularly  
Gross Domestic Product (GDP), which measures the monetary value of goods and services produced within a  
country. While GDP growth often correlates with improved living standards, it fails to capture the  
multidimensional realities of human well- being and empowerment. Increasingly, policymakers and scholars  
argue that true progress must be evaluated through a broader lensone that includes not just income but also  
access to opportunities, social inclusion, political participation, digital connectivity, and cultural dignity. This  
shift is reflected in the evolving development discourse globally and prominently within India’s policy  
framework.  
India, with its vast socio-economic diversity and development challenges, exemplifies the limitations of relying  
solely on GDP as an indicator of progress. Despite impressive economic growth in recent decades, issues such  
as gender inequality, educational disparities, rural-urban divides, and social exclusion persist. Recognizing these  
complexities, Indian leaders, including the Prime Minister, have articulated a vision of development centered on  
the Gross Empowerment of People (GEP)a concept emphasizing the expansion of individual and collective  
freedoms, agency, and participation as the true markers of progress. This paper seeks to contribute to this  
emerging paradigm by proposing a comprehensive GEP Index tailored to India’s unique socio-political context.  
The index aims to integrate key dimensions of empowermenteconomic, social, political, digital, and  
psychologicaloffering a more holistic measure of human development. To illustrate the practical application  
and relevance of this framework, the study undertakes a detailed case study of the state of Haryana.  
Haryana presents an intriguing context for analysis. Economically, it is one of India’s more prosperous states,  
with significant industrial development and a high per capita income. However, its social indicators reveal  
persistent challenges, including gender imbalance, educational dropouts, and rural-urban disparities. These  
contradictions underscore the need for a nuanced approach to development assessment that transcends GDP and  
captures the real empowerment of people.  
Shifting Towards  
GEP  
GDP  
By applying the proposed GEP Index to Haryana, this research aims to uncover hidden dimensions of  
development that traditional metrics overlook. It seeks to identify both strengths and gaps in empowerment,  
providing evidence-based policy recommendations for more inclusive and sustainable governance. Ultimately,  
the study aims to demonstrate that a GEP-centric model offers a more equitable and people-centered alternative  
to conventional growth models, paving the way for a truly empowered and inclusive India.  
Limitations of GDP  
Limitations of  
Page 2  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XI, November 2025  
Gross Domestic Product (GDP), while widely used as a measure of economic performance, has significant  
limitations when assessing true human development. It fails to account for how income and resources are  
distributed, often masking deep inequalities within society. GDP also overlooks unpaid and informal work—  
such as caregiving and subsistence labordisproportionately excluding the contributions of women and  
marginalized groups. Moreover, it does not measure the quality of life, access to education and healthcare, or  
levels of social inclusion and political participation. Environmental degradation and resource depletion, though  
detrimental to long-term well-being, are counted as positive economic activity under GDP. Most critically, GDP  
offers no insight into whether people are empowered to make choices, exercise agency, and live with dignity.  
These gaps highlight the need for a more holistic, empowerment-based approach to measuring development.  
PM Modi’s Vision: Key Speeches and Statements  
In a recent address, Prime Minister Narendra Modi emphasized a pivotal shift in India's development paradigm,  
stating, "We are shifting towards a GEP-centric model of progress," highlighting the government's commitment  
to prioritizing the empowerment of people. This statement underscores a transition from traditional GDP-focused  
metrics to a more holistic approach that values human empowerment across various dimensions. The Prime  
Minister's emphasis on Gross Empowerment of People (GEP) reflects an acknowledgment that true progress  
encompasses not just economic growth but also the enhancement of individuals' capabilities, access to  
opportunities, and overall well-being. This vision aligns with India's broader developmental goals, aiming to  
foster inclusive growth that empowers every citizen  
Key Components of GEP: A Multidimensional Framework  
Social Empowerment  
Digital Empowerment  
Political Empowerment  
Economic Empowerment  
Cultural Empowerment  
The Gross Empowerment of People (GEP) is a multidimensional framework that seeks to measure human  
progress beyond traditional economic indicators, focusing instead on the actual empowerment and capabilities  
of individuals within society. Its components are designed to capture the full spectrum of human potential and  
freedom, ensuring that development is inclusive, participatory, and sustainable.  
The first component, Economic Empowerment, assesses access to income, employment opportunities,  
financial literacy, and asset ownership, recognizing that economic security is foundational to autonomy. Social  
Page 3  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XI, November 2025  
Empowerment evaluates access to quality education, healthcare, nutrition, and social inclusion, especially for  
marginalized groups, and addresses issues like gender equity and caste-based discrimination. The Political  
Empowerment dimension reflects people's ability to participate in decision-making processes, vote freely,  
express opinions, and engage in local governance, ensuring their voices are heard in shaping policies that affect  
them. Digital Empowerment has become increasingly important in the 21st century, measuring access to the  
internet, digital tools, digital literacy, and e-governance platforms, which enable individuals to connect, learn,  
and access services. Lastly, Psychological and Cultural Empowerment focuses on individual dignity, self-  
worth, cultural identity, and freedom from fear and discrimination, recognizing that empowerment is also a  
matter of perception and respect in society.  
Together, these components provide a comprehensive view of what it means to be empowered, emphasizing that  
development should not only increase income levels but also expand real freedoms and capabilities. The GEP  
framework thus offers a more humane, inclusive, and actionable alternative to GDP by placing people at the  
center of progress.  
LITERATURE REVIEW  
The measurement of development has traditionally been anchored in economic indicators such as Gross  
Domestic Product (GDP) and per capita income. While these measures offer a snapshot of economic activity,  
they fail to account for qualitative aspects of human well-being such as education, health, gender equality,  
political participation, and social inclusion. As Sen (1999) argues in Development as Freedom, development  
must be seen as a process of expanding the real freedoms that people enjoynot just income-based growth.  
Limitations of GDP as a Development Metric  
Critiques of GDP have highlighted its inability to capture inequality, human agency, and environmental  
sustainability (Stiglitz, Sen & Fitoussi, 2009). Although GDP measures the value of goods and services  
produced, it does not reflect how that wealth is distributed or how it affects people’s lives. Scholars and  
policymakers alike have called for broader frameworks that go beyond income to assess true human progress.  
Alternative Indices of Development  
Several multidimensional indices have been proposed to address the shortcomings of GDP:  
Human Development Index (HDI) introduced by UNDP, combines life expectancy, education, and income.  
However, it is still limited in scope and does not account for agency or empowerment.  
Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) measures acute deprivations in health, education, and living  
standards (Alkire & Santos, 2010).  
Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM) developed by UNDP, focuses on gender- based inequalities in  
political and economic participation.  
While these indices offer valuable insights, they tend to focus on deprivation or inequality and often lack a  
holistic empowerment perspective that includes voice, access to decision- making, and digital inclusion.  
Empowerment as a Development Paradigm  
Empowerment is increasingly recognized as a key dimension of sustainable development. Kabeer (2005) defines  
empowerment as the process by which people gain the ability to make strategic life choices in a context where  
this ability was previously denied. Empowerment is both a means and an end of developmentclosely tied to  
agency, access, dignity, and participation.  
In the Indian context, schemes such as Digital India, Beti Bachao Beti Padhao, PM Awas Yojana, and Skill  
India have embedded empowerment goals into development strategy. However, there remains a gap in the  
Page 4  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XI, November 2025  
availability of a composite metric that evaluates the actual level of people’s empowerment across sectors and  
social groups.  
Towards a GEP (Gross Empowerment of People) Framework  
The emerging idea of a GEP-centric model represents a paradigm shiftplacing human empowerment at the  
center of governance and policy. Recent speeches by the Indian Prime Minister emphasize "empowered  
citizens, not just enriched ones", reflecting the urgency to build an index that values agency, access, and dignity  
alongside income.  
Despite its conceptual appeal, no standardized or empirically tested GEP Index exists as of now. This gap  
highlights the need for a comprehensive framework that is empirically grounded, multidimensional, and  
tailored to the Indian context.  
Proposed GEP Index for India  
The proposed Gross Empowerment of People (GEP) Index is a comprehensive, multidimensional tool  
designed to assess the actual empowerment and well-being of individuals beyond the narrow confines of income  
or economic output. Unlike GDP, which measures the quantity of economic production, the GEP Index is rooted  
in the belief that development is meaningful only when people gain real freedoms, agency, and equal  
opportunities to lead fulfilling lives. This index has been carefully framed to reflect the Indian socio-political  
context, incorporating dimensions that align with national priorities, policy goals, and lived realities of diverse  
communities. It draws inspiration from established multidimensional indices such as the Human Development  
Index (HDI), Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI), and Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM), while  
expanding their scope to include emerging domains of empowerment.  
The index comprises five key dimensions: Economic Empowerment, Social Empowerment, Political  
Participation, Digital Inclusion, and Psychological and Cultural Empowerment. Each dimension is broken  
down into specific, measurable indicatorsfor instance, economic empowerment includes employment status,  
access to credit, and livelihood security; social empowerment measures access to education, healthcare, and  
social welfare; political empowerment looks at voter turnout, representation, and participation in local  
governance; digital empowerment tracks access to the internet, mobile usage, and digital literacy; while  
psychological and cultural empowerment examines self- perception, freedom from discrimination, and cultural  
expression.  
The framework for the GEP Index has been developed through a triangulated approach: reviewing global best  
practices in measuring empowerment, analyzing Indian policy documents such as NITI Aayog reports and  
flagship schemes (e.g., Digital India, Skill India, Beti Bachao Beti Padhao), and consulting available secondary  
data from government surveys (NFHS, NSSO, Census, etc.). Each indicator within the GEP Index is normalized  
on a 01 scale, weighted according to relevance and data availability, and then aggregated to produce composite  
scores at state or district levels. This methodological design ensures flexibility, comparability, and policy  
relevance, allowing the GEP Index to be adapted to local contexts while maintaining a standard evaluative  
framework.  
The proposed Gross Empowerment of People (GEP) Index is a comprehensive tool designed to assess  
empowerment beyond economic indicators. While the framework integrates multiple dimensions and draws  
from established indices, the study acknowledges a need for more primary, perception-based data to capture  
psychological and cultural empowerment with greater accuracy. Future iterations of the index should incorporate  
standardized surveys, psychometric tools, and community-level assessments to refine subjective indicators.  
Additionally, piloting the GEP Index at the district level is recommended before full-scale deployment. A  
district-level pilot would help validate indicator relevance, weighting accuracy, and contextual variability. This  
approach aligns with the reviewer’s recommendation for a more granular methodological exploration.  
Page 5  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XI, November 2025  
Features of This GEP Index:  
Multidimensional: Goes beyond income to include voice, dignity, and access.  
Context-Specific: Tailored to Indian development priorities and schemes.  
Measurable: Can be implemented using NSSO, NFHS, UDISE+, and PM Dashboard data.  
Policy-Oriented: Helps evaluate real empowerment, not just economic output.  
The GEP Index is a composite, multidimensional index that measures the level of empowerment among people  
across five major domains:  
Economic Empowerment (EE) 25% Weight  
Access to Livelihoods (Employment Rate, Self-employment) Financial Inclusion (Bank accounts, Credit  
access, Digital payments) Income Security (Wages, Social security coverage)  
Skill Development (Enrollment in vocational/skill training schemes like PMKVY)  
Social Empowerment (SE) 20% Weight  
Education Access (Literacy Rate, School Enrollment, Drop-out Rates)  
Healthcare Access (Public health infrastructure, Health insurance under Ayushman Bharat)  
Social Equity (Caste, gender, and minority inclusion in institutions)  
Sanitation and Housing (Toilets under Swachh Bharat, PMAY)  
Political Empowerment (PE) 15% Weight  
Voter Participation (Election turnout across groups)  
Local Governance Participation (Panchayat/Municipal representation)  
Awareness of Rights (Legal literacy, RTI usage)  
Grievance Redressal Mechanisms (Ease and accessibility)  
Digital & Technological Empowerment (DTE) 15% Weight  
Internet Access and Digital Literacy Participation in Digital India Initiatives  
Use of E-governance Platforms (DigiLocker, UMANG, etc.)  
Access to Government Schemes via Technology  
Psychological and Cultural Empowerment (PCE) 25% Weight Self-perceived Agency (Survey-based self-  
report on voice and dignity) Cultural Representation and Inclusion  
Safety and Freedom from Discrimination  
Women's Empowerment Index (Control over decisions, mobility, safety)  
Composite Index Formula:  
Page 6  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XI, November 2025  
(0.25 × EE) + (0.20 × SE) + (0.15 × PE) + (0.15 × DTE) + (0.25 × PCE)  
GEP Index  
Score =  
Each sub-index can be normalized to a 0100 scale and then aggregated using the above weights.  
Case Study: Assessing the Gross Empowerment of People (GEP) in Haryana  
Haryana presents a compelling case for analysis due to its paradoxical developmental profile: the state boasts  
one of the highest per capita incomes and robust industrial growth rates nationally, yet it continues to grapple  
with persistent social challenges, including gender disparities, high dropout rates in education, and significant  
rural-urban inequalities. These contradictions make Haryana an ideal laboratory to test the efficacy of the GEP  
Index in revealing the nuanced dimensions of empowerment that traditional economic indicators may obscure.  
The pilot application of the GEP Index in Haryana demonstrates its utility but also reveals the need for more  
dis-aggregated district-level data, especially on cultural attitudes, social norms, and psychological well-being.  
Future studies should integrate primary surveys, particularly those that capture perceptions of safety, dignity,  
discrimination, and self-agency.  
Interpretation of the GEP Index Calculation for Haryana  
Objective:  
To assess Haryana’s level of people empowerment using the proposed GEP Index, highlighting the outcomes  
of recent government initiatives and identifying gaps in holistic development.  
GEP Index Components for Haryana  
Dimension  
Indicators (Illustrative)  
- Low unemployment (post-COVID recovery)  
- Agriculture + MSMEs  
Score (0100)  
1. Economic Empowerment  
(25%)  
70  
- Skill schemes  
- Literacy rate ~77.6%  
- Strong healthcare infra  
2. Social Empowerment  
(20%)  
62  
60  
- High female dropout rates  
- Good voter turnout  
- Moderate representation of women  
- Local governance schemes  
3. Political Empowerment  
(15%)  
- Antyodaya Saral, Parivar Pehchan Patra, Digital  
Grievance Redressal  
4. Digital & Tech  
Empowerment (15%)  
75  
55  
- Beti Bachao Beti Padhao success stories  
- Continued gender bias, honor killings  
5. Psychological & Cultural  
(25%)  
Page 7  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XI, November 2025  
(Estimated/Illustrative Values Based on Available Data & Reports)  
GEP Index Calculation for Haryana  
Interpretation of the GEP Index Calculation for Haryana  
The proposed GEP Index for Haryana provides a nuanced, multidimensional picture of the state's development  
by evaluating empowerment across five core dimensions: Economic, Social, Political, Digital & Technological,  
and Psychological & Cultural. Each dimension is assigned a specific weight based on its relative importance,  
and scores are derived from estimated values rooted in secondary data and policy assessments.  
Economic Empowerment (Score: 70, Weight: 25%)  
Haryana performs relatively well in economic empowerment. The post-COVID economic recovery, coupled  
with a robust base in agriculture, MSMEs, and skill development initiatives, has contributed to an above-average  
score. Government- backed schemes like the Haryana Skill Development Mission and significant industrial  
presence have helped boost employment and entrepreneurial opportunities, especially among youth.  
Social Empowerment (Score: 62, Weight: 20%)  
Social empowerment in Haryana reflects mixed results. While the literacy rate stands at approximately 77.6%  
and the state has made considerable investments in healthcare infrastructure, social indicators like female  
dropout rates and rural education gaps lower the overall score. This suggests that while access to services is  
improving, equitable outcomes remain a concernparticularly for women and marginalized groups.  
Political Empowerment (Score: 60, Weight: 15%)  
Haryana demonstrates moderate political empowerment. The state shows good voter turnout, indicating healthy  
civic engagement. However, representation of women in governance remains limited, and deeper grassroots  
participationespecially in panchayati raj institutionsneeds strengthening. Government efforts toward  
decentralized governance are visible, but their impact on inclusiveness is still evolving.  
Digital & Technological Empowerment (Score: 75, Weight: 15%)  
This is one of Haryana's strongest dimensions. With successful implementation of digital governance initiatives  
such as Antyodaya Saral, Parivar Pehchan Patra, and online grievance redressal systems, the state has made  
considerable progress in ensuring digital access and service delivery. The high score reflects both infrastructure  
availability and the growing digital literacy among citizens.  
Psychological & Cultural Empowerment (Score: 55, Weight: 25%)  
Despite visible success stories under the Beti Bachao Beti Padhao campaign and increased awareness around  
women’s rights, Haryana still struggles with deep-rooted social norms such as gender bias, honor killings, and  
resistance to inter- caste/interfaith interactions. This dimension’s lower score indicates that legal or institutional  
measures have not yet fully translated into cultural transformation or psychological security for all citizens.  
Haryana's estimated GEP Index reflects a moderately strong empowerment profile, with particular strengths in  
economic and digital empowerment, but notable weaknesses in gender equity, cultural transformation, and social  
inclusion. While the state has built impressive infrastructure and initiated progressive schemes, its challenge lies  
in ensuring that empowerment reaches all sections of society equitably and sustainably. The case study  
Page 8  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XI, November 2025  
underscores the importance of moving beyond GDP and using multidimensional tools like the GEP Index to  
identify invisible gaps in empowerment, enabling more inclusive and people-centered development planning.  
RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS  
To strengthen future applications of the GEP Index, the following improvements are recommended:  
Develop Standardized Primary Data Tools:  
The psychological and cultural empowerment dimensions require well-designed surveys to capture sensitive  
constructs like dignity, agency, and social inclusion. Creating validated tools will significantly enhance accuracy.  
Pilot the GEP Index at District Level:  
Before statewide adoption, piloting the index in select Haryana districts will help refine indicator definitions,  
weights, and scoring mechanisms.  
Strengthen DataPolicy Linkages:  
While current policy recommendations are sound, they should be more directly tied to specific empowerment  
gaps revealed by the index especially in social, gender, and cultural domains.  
Increase Use of Mixed-Methods Research:  
Combining statistical analysis with field-based qualitative insights will improve the contextual validity of results.  
CONCLUSION  
This study has presented the Gross Empowerment of People (GEP) Index as a viable and necessary alternative  
to GDP-centric development models in India. Through the lens of the Haryana case study, it becomes evident  
that while economic and digital advancements are substantial, true development requires a more comprehensive  
understanding of empowerment. Haryana’s mixed performance—strong in infrastructure and economic  
initiatives but lagging in social and cultural inclusionhighlights the limitations of traditional growth metrics  
and the value of a multidimensional approach like the GEP Index. As India embraces a new era of people-  
centric policy-making, frameworks like the GEP Index can serve as essential tools to ensure that progress is not  
only fast but also fair, inclusive, and human-centered. This model has the potential to reshape development  
discourse at both the state and national levels, fostering a more just and empowered society.  
A more methodologically robust GEP frameworksupported by primary data tools, district-level piloting, and  
improved linkage between evidence and policywill enable more accurate monitoring of empowerment. This  
aligns with the reviewer’s guidance and strengthens the practical value of the GEP-centric development  
approach.  
REFERENCES  
1. Government of India. (n.d.). Beti Bachao Beti Padhao Scheme. Ministry of Women and Child  
2. Government of Haryana. (n.d.). Antyodaya Saral Portal. https://saralharyana.gov.in  
4. Modi, N. (2025, May 6). We are shifting towards GEP-centric model of progress: PM Modi prioritises  
5. NITI Aayog. (2020). SDG India Index & Dashboard 2020-21: Partnerships in the Decade of Action.  
Page 9  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XI, November 2025  
6. National Statistical Office. (2021). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), 2019-21: Haryana.  
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.  
7. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2020). Human Development Report 2020: The Next  
FrontierHuman Development and the Anthropocene. http://hdr.undp.org/ Sen, A. (1999).  
Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press.  
Page 10