INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XI, November 2025  
"Towards GDP to GEP-Centric Model: A Proposed GEP Index  
Framework and Its Application in Haryana"  
Ms. Arti Kumari, Dr. Laita Dhingra, Dr. Nisha Singh  
Assistant Professor, DAVCC Faridabad  
Abstract: In the coming years, India’s developmental narrative is poised for a fundamental shift— from a traditional Gross  
Domestic Product (GDP)-driven model toward a more inclusive and empowerment-based framework of progress. This emerging  
paradigm is increasingly reflected in national policy discourse and statements by the Prime Minister, who emphasizes the need for  
a development approach centered on the Gross Empowerment of People (GEP) rather than solely on economic output. The  
concept of GEP underscores a multidimensional understanding of development that includes economic, social, political, digital,  
and cultural empowerment, moving beyond conventional growth metrics to focus on the real capabilities, freedoms, and dignity of  
individuals.  
This research paper investigates the theoretical foundations and practical significance of the GEP model as a guiding principle in  
India’s evolving development strategy. Recognizing the complexity of measuring empowerment, the study proposes a  
comprehensive and context-sensitive GEP Index, designed to capture the multidimensional nature of empowerment within India’s  
unique socio-political landscape.  
The research applies this proposed GEP Index to a detailed case study of the state of Haryana. Haryana presents a compelling case  
for analysis due to its paradoxical developmental profile: the state boasts one of the highest per capita incomes and robust industrial  
growth rates nationally, yet it continues to grapple with persistent social challenges, including gender disparities, high dropout rates  
in education, and significant rural-urban inequalities. These contradictions make Haryana an ideal laboratory to test the efficacy of  
the GEP Index in revealing the nuanced dimensions of empowerment that traditional economic indicators may obscure.  
Using a composite methodology that integrates quantitative data from government reports, surveys, and indices, alongside  
qualitative assessments of policy impacts, the study evaluates Haryana’s performance across five key dimensions of the GEP  
Indexeconomic empowerment, social empowerment, political participation, digital inclusion, and psychological and cultural  
empowerment. The findings highlight areas of strength, such as economic and digital empowerment, alongside critical gaps in  
social and cultural dimensions, particularly related to gender equality and educational access.  
The study concludes by discussing the implications of adopting a GEP-centric development framework for policymakers,  
emphasizing how such an approach can help bridge the gap between economic growth and genuine human development. It argues  
that the GEP Index offers a more holistic and equitable alternative to GDP, enabling governments to design targeted interventions  
that foster inclusive empowerment. Ultimately, this research contributes to the growing global and Indian discourse on redefining  
progress by offering a practical, measurable, and policy-relevant empowerment framework. It demonstrates that while Haryana  
exemplifies some of India’s economic successes, true development must be measured by the extent to which its people are  
empowered to participate fully in society and shape their own futures.  
Key Words: Gross Empowerment of People (GEP), GEP Index, Multidimensional Empowerment, case study of Haryana, Beyond  
GDP  
I. Introduction  
The conventional understanding of development has long been dominated by economic indicators, particularly Gross Domestic  
Product (GDP), which measures the monetary value of goods and services produced within a country. While GDP growth often  
correlates with improved living standards, it fails to capture the multidimensional realities of human well- being and empowerment.  
Increasingly, policymakers and scholars argue that true progress must be evaluated through a broader lensone that includes not  
just income but also access to opportunities, social inclusion, political participation, digital connectivity, and cultural dignity. This  
shift is reflected in the evolving development discourse globally and prominently within India’s policy framework.  
India, with its vast socio-economic diversity and development challenges, exemplifies the limitations of relying solely on GDP as  
an indicator of progress. Despite impressive economic growth in recent decades, issues such as gender inequality, educational  
disparities, rural-urban divides, and social exclusion persist. Recognizing these complexities, Indian leaders, including the Prime  
Minister, have articulated a vision of development centered on the Gross Empowerment of People (GEP)a concept emphasizing  
the expansion of individual and collective freedoms, agency, and participation as the true markers of progress. This paper seeks to  
contribute to this emerging paradigm by proposing a comprehensive GEP Index tailored to India’s unique socio-political context.  
The index aims to integrate key dimensions of empowermenteconomic, social, political, digital, and psychologicaloffering a  
more holistic measure of human development. To illustrate the practical application and relevance of this framework, the study  
undertakes a detailed case study of the state of Haryana.  
Page 1  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XI, November 2025  
Haryana presents an intriguing context for analysis. Economically, it is one of India’s more prosperous states, with significant  
industrial development and a high per capita income. However, its social indicators reveal persistent challenges, including gender  
imbalance, educational dropouts, and rural-urban disparities. These contradictions underscore the need for a nuanced approach to  
development assessment that transcends GDP and captures the real empowerment of people.  
Shifting Towards  
GEP  
GDP  
By applying the proposed GEP Index to Haryana, this research aims to uncover hidden dimensions of development that traditional  
metrics overlook. It seeks to identify both strengths and gaps in empowerment, providing evidence-based policy recommendations  
for more inclusive and sustainable governance. Ultimately, the study aims to demonstrate that a GEP-centric model offers a more  
equitable and people-centered alternative to conventional growth models, paving the way for a truly empowered and inclusive India.  
Limitations of GDP  
Limitations of  
GDP  
Gross Domestic Product (GDP), while widely used as a measure of economic performance, has significant limitations when  
assessing true human development. It fails to account for how income and resources are distributed, often masking deep inequalities  
within society. GDP also overlooks unpaid and informal worksuch as caregiving and subsistence labordisproportionately  
excluding the contributions of women and marginalized groups. Moreover, it does not measure the quality of life, access to  
education and healthcare, or levels of social inclusion and political participation. Environmental degradation and resource depletion,  
though detrimental to long-term well-being, are counted as positive economic activity under GDP. Most critically, GDP offers  
no insight into whether people are empowered to make choices, exercise agency, and live with dignity. These gaps highlight the  
need for a more holistic, empowerment-based approach to measuring development.  
PM Modi’s Vision: Key Speeches and Statements  
In a recent address, Prime Minister Narendra Modi emphasized a pivotal shift in India's development paradigm, stating, "We are  
shifting towards a GEP-centric model of progress," highlighting the government's commitment to prioritizing the empowerment of  
Page 2  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XI, November 2025  
people. This statement underscores a transition from traditional GDP-focused metrics to a more holistic approach that values human  
empowerment across various dimensions. The Prime Minister's emphasis on Gross Empowerment of People (GEP) reflects an  
acknowledgment that true progress encompasses not just economic growth but also the enhancement of individuals' capabilities,  
access to opportunities, and overall well-being. This vision aligns with India's broader developmental goals, aiming to foster  
inclusive growth that empowers every citizen  
Key Components of GEP: A Multidimensional Framework  
Economic Empowerment  
Social Empowerment  
Digital Empowerment  
Political Empowerment  
Cultural Empowerment  
The Gross Empowerment of People (GEP) is a multidimensional framework that seeks to measure human progress beyond  
traditional economic indicators, focusing instead on the actual empowerment and capabilities of individuals within society. Its  
components are designed to capture the full spectrum of human potential and freedom, ensuring that development is inclusive,  
participatory, and sustainable.  
The first component, Economic Empowerment, assesses access to income, employment opportunities, financial literacy, and  
asset ownership, recognizing that economic security is foundational to autonomy. Social Empowerment evaluates access to quality  
education, healthcare, nutrition, and social inclusion, especially for marginalized groups, and addresses issues like gender equity  
and caste-based discrimination. The Political Empowerment dimension reflects people's ability to participate in decision-making  
processes, vote freely, express opinions, and engage in local governance, ensuring their voices are heard in shaping policies that  
affect them. Digital Empowerment has become increasingly important in the 21st century, measuring access to the internet, digital  
tools, digital literacy, and e-governance platforms, which enable individuals to connect, learn, and access services. Lastly,  
Psychological and Cultural Empowerment focuses on individual dignity, self-worth, cultural identity, and freedom from fear and  
discrimination, recognizing that empowerment is also a matter of perception and respect in society.  
Together, these components provide a comprehensive view of what it means to be empowered, emphasizing that development  
should not only increase income levels but also expand real freedoms and capabilities. The GEP framework thus offers a more  
humane, inclusive, and actionable alternative to GDP by placing people at the center of progress.  
II. Literature Review  
The measurement of development has traditionally been anchored in economic indicators such as Gross Domestic Product (GDP)  
and per capita income. While these measures offer a snapshot of economic activity, they fail to account for qualitative aspects of  
human well-being such as education, health, gender equality, political participation, and social inclusion. As Sen (1999) argues in  
Development as Freedom, development must be seen as a process of expanding the real freedoms that people enjoynot just  
Page 3  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XI, November 2025  
income-based growth.  
Limitations of GDP as a Development Metric  
Critiques of GDP have highlighted its inability to capture inequality, human agency, and environmental sustainability (Stiglitz, Sen  
& Fitoussi, 2009). Although GDP measures the value of goods and services produced, it does not reflect how that wealth is  
distributed or how it affects people’s lives. Scholars and policymakers alike have called for broader frameworks that go beyond  
income to assess true human progress.  
Alternative Indices of Development  
Several multidimensional indices have been proposed to address the shortcomings of GDP:  
Human Development Index (HDI) introduced by UNDP, combines life expectancy, education, and income. However, it is still  
limited in scope and does not account for agency or empowerment.  
Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) measures acute deprivations in health, education, and living standards (Alkire & Santos,  
2010).  
Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM) developed by UNDP, focuses on gender- based inequalities in political and economic  
participation.  
While these indices offer valuable insights, they tend to focus on deprivation or inequality and often lack a holistic empowerment  
perspective that includes voice, access to decision- making, and digital inclusion.  
Empowerment as a Development Paradigm  
Empowerment is increasingly recognized as a key dimension of sustainable development. Kabeer (2005) defines empowerment as  
the process by which people gain the ability to make strategic life choices in a context where this ability was previously denied.  
Empowerment is both a means and an end of developmentclosely tied to agency, access, dignity, and participation.  
In the Indian context, schemes such as Digital India, Beti Bachao Beti Padhao, PM Awas Yojana, and Skill India have embedded  
empowerment goals into development strategy. However, there remains a gap in the availability of a composite metric that  
evaluates the actual level of people’s empowerment across sectors and social groups.  
Towards a GEP (Gross Empowerment of People) Framework  
The emerging idea of a GEP-centric model represents a paradigm shiftplacing human empowerment at the center of governance  
and policy. Recent speeches by the Indian Prime Minister emphasize "empowered citizens, not just enriched ones", reflecting  
the urgency to build an index that values agency, access, and dignity alongside income.  
Despite its conceptual appeal, no standardized or empirically tested GEP Index exists as of now. This gap highlights the need  
for a comprehensive framework that is empirically grounded, multidimensional, and tailored to the Indian context.  
Proposed GEP Index for India  
The proposed Gross Empowerment of People (GEP) Index is a comprehensive, multidimensional tool designed to assess the  
actual empowerment and well-being of individuals beyond the narrow confines of income or economic output. Unlike GDP, which  
measures the quantity of economic production, the GEP Index is rooted in the belief that development is meaningful only when  
people gain real freedoms, agency, and equal opportunities to lead fulfilling lives. This index has been carefully framed to  
reflect the Indian socio-political context, incorporating dimensions that align with national priorities, policy goals, and lived realities  
of diverse communities. It draws inspiration from established multidimensional indices such as the Human Development Index  
(HDI), Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI), and Gender Empowerment Measure (GEM), while expanding their scope to include  
emerging domains of empowerment.  
The index comprises five key dimensions: Economic Empowerment, Social Empowerment, Political Participation, Digital  
Inclusion, and Psychological and Cultural Empowerment. Each dimension is broken down into specific, measurable  
indicatorsfor instance, economic empowerment includes employment status, access to credit, and livelihood security; social  
empowerment measures access to education, healthcare, and social welfare; political empowerment looks at voter turnout,  
representation, and participation in local governance; digital empowerment tracks access to the internet, mobile usage, and digital  
literacy; while psychological and cultural empowerment examines self- perception, freedom from discrimination, and cultural  
expression.  
The framework for the GEP Index has been developed through a triangulated approach: reviewing global best practices in  
measuring empowerment, analyzing Indian policy documents such as NITI Aayog reports and flagship schemes (e.g., Digital India,  
Skill India, Beti Bachao Beti Padhao), and consulting available secondary data from government surveys (NFHS, NSSO, Census,  
etc.). Each indicator within the GEP Index is normalized on a 01 scale, weighted according to relevance and data availability,  
and then aggregated to produce composite scores at state or district levels. This methodological design ensures flexibility,  
comparability, and policy relevance, allowing the GEP Index to be adapted to local contexts while maintaining a standard evaluative  
Page 4  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XI, November 2025  
framework.  
The proposed Gross Empowerment of People (GEP) Index is a comprehensive tool designed to assess empowerment beyond  
economic indicators. While the framework integrates multiple dimensions and draws from established indices, the study  
acknowledges a need for more primary, perception-based data to capture psychological and cultural empowerment with greater  
accuracy. Future iterations of the index should incorporate standardized surveys, psychometric tools, and community-level  
assessments to refine subjective indicators. Additionally, piloting the GEP Index at the district level is recommended before full-  
scale deployment. A district-level pilot would help validate indicator relevance, weighting accuracy, and contextual variability.  
This approach aligns with the reviewer’s recommendation for a more granular methodological exploration.  
Features of This GEP Index:  
Multidimensional: Goes beyond income to include voice, dignity, and access.  
Context-Specific: Tailored to Indian development priorities and schemes.  
Measurable: Can be implemented using NSSO, NFHS, UDISE+, and PM Dashboard data.  
Policy-Oriented: Helps evaluate real empowerment, not just economic output.  
The GEP Index is a composite, multidimensional index that measures the level of empowerment among people across five major  
domains:  
Economic Empowerment (EE) 25% Weight  
Access to Livelihoods (Employment Rate, Self-employment) Financial Inclusion (Bank accounts, Credit access, Digital  
payments) Income Security (Wages, Social security coverage)  
Skill Development (Enrollment in vocational/skill training schemes like PMKVY)  
Social Empowerment (SE) 20% Weight  
Education Access (Literacy Rate, School Enrollment, Drop-out Rates)  
Healthcare Access (Public health infrastructure, Health insurance under Ayushman Bharat)  
Social Equity (Caste, gender, and minority inclusion in institutions)  
Sanitation and Housing (Toilets under Swachh Bharat, PMAY)  
Political Empowerment (PE) 15% Weight  
Voter Participation (Election turnout across groups)  
Local Governance Participation (Panchayat/Municipal representation)  
Awareness of Rights (Legal literacy, RTI usage)  
Grievance Redressal Mechanisms (Ease and accessibility)  
Digital & Technological Empowerment (DTE) 15% Weight  
Internet Access and Digital Literacy Participation in Digital India Initiatives  
Use of E-governance Platforms (DigiLocker, UMANG, etc.)  
Access to Government Schemes via Technology  
Psychological and Cultural Empowerment (PCE) 25% Weight Self-perceived Agency (Survey-based self-report on voice and  
dignity) Cultural Representation and Inclusion  
Safety and Freedom from Discrimination  
Women's Empowerment Index (Control over decisions, mobility, safety)  
Composite Index Formula:  
(0.25 × EE) + (0.20 × SE) + (0.15 × PE) + (0.15 × DTE) + (0.25 × PCE)  
GEP Index  
Score =  
Each sub-index can be normalized to a 0100 scale and then aggregated using the above weights.  
Page 5  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XI, November 2025  
Case Study: Assessing the Gross Empowerment of People (GEP) in Haryana  
Haryana presents a compelling case for analysis due to its paradoxical developmental profile: the state boasts one of the highest per  
capita incomes and robust industrial growth rates nationally, yet it continues to grapple with persistent social challenges, including  
gender disparities, high dropout rates in education, and significant rural-urban inequalities. These contradictions make Haryana  
an ideal laboratory to test the efficacy of the GEP Index in revealing the nuanced dimensions of empowerment that traditional  
economic indicators may obscure.  
The pilot application of the GEP Index in Haryana demonstrates its utility but also reveals the need for more dis-aggregated  
district-level data, especially on cultural attitudes, social norms, and psychological well-being. Future studies should integrate  
primary surveys, particularly those that capture perceptions of safety, dignity, discrimination, and self-agency.  
Interpretation of the GEP Index Calculation for Haryana  
Objective:  
To assess Haryana’s level of people empowerment using the proposed GEP Index, highlighting the outcomes of recent  
government initiatives and identifying gaps in holistic development.  
GEP Index Components for Haryana  
Dimension  
Indicators (Illustrative)  
- Low unemployment (post-COVID recovery)  
- Agriculture + MSMEs  
Score (0100)  
1. Economic Empowerment  
(25%)  
70  
- Skill schemes  
- Literacy rate ~77.6%  
2. Social Empowerment  
(20%)  
62  
60  
- Strong healthcare infra  
- High female dropout rates  
- Good voter turnout  
3. Political Empowerment  
(15%)  
- Moderate representation of women  
- Local governance schemes  
- Antyodaya Saral, Parivar Pehchan Patra, Digital Grievance  
Redressal  
4. Digital & Tech Empowerment  
(15%)  
75  
55  
5. Psychological & Cultural (25%)  
- Beti Bachao Beti Padhao success stories  
- Continued gender bias, honor killings  
(Estimated/Illustrative Values Based on Available Data & Reports)  
GEP Index Calculation for Haryana  
Interpretation of the GEP Index Calculation for Haryana  
The proposed GEP Index for Haryana provides a nuanced, multidimensional picture of the state's development by evaluating  
empowerment across five core dimensions: Economic, Social, Political, Digital & Technological, and Psychological & Cultural.  
Each dimension is assigned a specific weight based on its relative importance, and scores are derived from estimated values rooted  
in secondary data and policy assessments.  
Economic Empowerment (Score: 70, Weight: 25%)  
Page 6  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XI, November 2025  
Haryana performs relatively well in economic empowerment. The post-COVID economic recovery, coupled with a robust base in  
agriculture, MSMEs, and skill development initiatives, has contributed to an above-average score. Government- backed schemes  
like the Haryana Skill Development Mission and significant industrial presence have helped boost employment and entrepreneurial  
opportunities, especially among youth.  
Social Empowerment (Score: 62, Weight: 20%)  
Social empowerment in Haryana reflects mixed results. While the literacy rate stands at approximately 77.6% and the state has  
made considerable investments in healthcare infrastructure, social indicators like female dropout rates and rural education gaps  
lower the overall score. This suggests that while access to services is improving, equitable outcomes remain a concernparticularly  
for women and marginalized groups.  
Political Empowerment (Score: 60, Weight: 15%)  
Haryana demonstrates moderate political empowerment. The state shows good voter turnout, indicating healthy civic engagement.  
However, representation of women in governance remains limited, and deeper grassroots participationespecially in panchayati  
raj institutionsneeds strengthening. Government efforts toward decentralized governance are visible, but their impact on  
inclusiveness is still evolving.  
Digital & Technological Empowerment (Score: 75, Weight: 15%)  
This is one of Haryana's strongest dimensions. With successful implementation of digital governance initiatives such as Antyodaya  
Saral, Parivar Pehchan Patra, and online grievance redressal systems, the state has made considerable progress in ensuring digital  
access and service delivery. The high score reflects both infrastructure availability and the growing digital literacy among citizens.  
Psychological & Cultural Empowerment (Score: 55, Weight: 25%)  
Despite visible success stories under the Beti Bachao Beti Padhao campaign and increased awareness around women’s rights,  
Haryana still struggles with deep-rooted social norms such as gender bias, honor killings, and resistance to inter- caste/interfaith  
interactions. This dimension’s lower score indicates that legal or institutional measures have not yet fully translated into cultural  
transformation or psychological security for all citizens.  
Haryana's estimated GEP Index reflects a moderately strong empowerment profile, with particular strengths in economic and digital  
empowerment, but notable weaknesses in gender equity, cultural transformation, and social inclusion. While the state has built  
impressive infrastructure and initiated progressive schemes, its challenge lies in ensuring that empowerment reaches all sections of  
society equitably and sustainably. The case study underscores the importance of moving beyond GDP and using multidimensional  
tools like the GEP Index to identify invisible gaps in empowerment, enabling more inclusive and people-centered development  
planning.  
III. Recommendations and Suggestions  
To strengthen future applications of the GEP Index, the following improvements are recommended:  
Develop Standardized Primary Data Tools:  
The psychological and cultural empowerment dimensions require well-designed surveys to capture sensitive constructs like dignity,  
agency, and social inclusion. Creating validated tools will significantly enhance accuracy.  
Pilot the GEP Index at District Level:  
Before statewide adoption, piloting the index in select Haryana districts will help refine indicator definitions, weights, and scoring  
mechanisms.  
Strengthen DataPolicy Linkages:  
While current policy recommendations are sound, they should be more directly tied to specific empowerment gaps revealed by the  
index especially in social, gender, and cultural domains.  
Increase Use of Mixed-Methods Research:  
Combining statistical analysis with field-based qualitative insights will improve the contextual validity of results.  
IV. Conclusion  
This study has presented the Gross Empowerment of People (GEP) Index as a viable and necessary alternative to GDP-centric  
development models in India. Through the lens of the Haryana case study, it becomes evident that while economic and digital  
advancements are substantial, true development requires a more comprehensive understanding of empowerment. Haryana’s mixed  
performancestrong in infrastructure and economic initiatives but lagging in social and cultural inclusionhighlights the  
limitations of traditional growth metrics and the value of a multidimensional approach like the GEP Index. As India embraces a  
new era of people-centric policy-making, frameworks like the GEP Index can serve as essential tools to ensure that progress is not  
only fast but also fair, inclusive, and human-centered. This model has the potential to reshape development discourse at both the  
state and national levels, fostering a more just and empowered society.  
Page 7  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XI, November 2025  
A more methodologically robust GEP frameworksupported by primary data tools, district-level piloting, and improved linkage  
between evidence and policywill enable more accurate monitoring of empowerment. This aligns with the reviewer’s guidance  
and strengthens the practical value of the GEP-centric development approach.  
References  
1. Government of India. (n.d.). Beti Bachao Beti Padhao Scheme. Ministry of Women and Child Development.  
2. Government of Haryana. (n.d.). Antyodaya Saral Portal. https://saralharyana.gov.in  
4. Modi, N. (2025, May 6). We are shifting towards GEP-centric model of progress: PM Modi prioritises empowerment of  
5. NITI Aayog. (2020). SDG India Index & Dashboard 2020-21: Partnerships in the Decade of Action.  
6. National Statistical Office. (2021). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5), 2019-21: Haryana. Ministry of Health and  
Family Welfare.  
7. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2020). Human Development Report 2020: The Next Frontier—  
Human Development and the Anthropocene. http://hdr.undp.org/ Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford  
University Press.  
Page 8