INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XI, November 2025
reflections on different points of economics, highlighting the elaboration of the labor theory of value and
comparative advantage.
From this perspective, it supports the discussion of ER and its influence on ES, in terms of being
comprehensive from a methodological standpoint and doing justice to some of the theories presented, when it
evokes, for example, the non-interference and/or protectionism of the state regarding goods and services (in
the case of cereals), since, as it argues, the role of the state should be that of a facilitator, therefore, the
compression of the health market from the perspective of ES, as Matias (1995) argues, must address 3
fundamental components: i) the object of choice, which in this case consists of the good health care; ii) the
behavior of the demand agent, which here is the patient; iii) the behavior of the supply agent, which here will
be the health sector professionals, namely doctors, nurses, hospital administrators and other support staff, so
the statement that supply generates its own demand (Ricardo, 1976) conveys this objective.
Viewed from the perspective above, the question that arises aims to discuss the methodological foundations of
David Ricardo and their application in the field of the Mozambican health market through ES.
David Ricardo's Contributions to Modern Economics
Silva (2003) states that, from an ideological point of view, Ricardo was influenced by the ideals of liberty,
equality, and fraternity of the French Revolution. Moreover, not only Ricardo, but some sectors of the
European elites harbored a certain sympathy for the conflict, notably for its insurgency against the absolutist
and aristocratic tradition. The new phase of capitalism, now asserting itself, required the materialization of
these ideals.
From an intellectual standpoint, considering the influence he received from Smith, Ricardo, to a greater or
lesser degree, directly or indirectly, also received influence from other economists of his time. A contemporary
of Thomas Malthus, Ricardo accepted the theory of population and even Malthus's ideas regarding workers
and the causes of poverty. But, regardless of the weight of these points in common, both were intellectual
adversaries with marked disagreements. This relationship, however, always remained confined to the realm of
ideas, since the two maintained deep friendships and mutual admiration throughout their lives.
Therefore, it follows from the above statements that Ricardo was open to analyzing even divergent economic
fields, in order to reach a consensus on differences without ceasing to consider opposing ideas. For this reason,
Luna (2021) highlights the fact that Ricardo not only adopted but also perfected Jean-Baptiste Say's
assumption, which essentially stated that supply generates its own demand, thus making the hypothesis of a
systemic crisis inadmissible. This phenomenon would therefore be circumstantial and possible only in
particular sectors, never in the economy as a whole. If the price of a commodity increased, the extraordinary
profits offered by the sector in question would attract capitalists seeking to seize the opportunity. The larger
number of producers in that market segment would reduce profits, causing the rate to return to an average rate.
Ricardo's Labor Theory of Value
In the Ricardian analytical scheme, the theory of value occupies a central position, even though Ricardo
himself affirmed its priority in relation to the distribution of income among social classes. Unlike Smith, in his
reflections on value, Ricardo's purpose was to understand the effects of variations in relative prices on income
distribution, and the impacts of this on economic growth (Silva, 2003).
Therefore, it is understood that simultaneously or in parallel, while the income redistribution process should
prioritize the most disadvantaged, price variations related to income distribution should be evaluated from the
perspective of improving the population's quality of life.
According to Sandroni (1995), Ricardo improved Smith's labor theory of value, which is nothing more than a
theory of production costs, by perceiving a series of logical inconsistencies in it. The costs of production (land,
labor, and capital), of an incommensurable and heterogeneous nature, can only be added together if reduced to
a common denominator. However, as Smith himself had already observed, reducing them to their monetary
Page 677