INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XI, November 2025
DISCUSSION
The objective of this study was to examine the complex relationships among service quality perceptions,
customer sentiment, and satisfaction in Ghana’s mobile telecommunications sector by integrating classical
SERVQUAL constructs with both experienced and expressed sentiment measures. The findings yield new
theoretical and empirical insights that advance existing QoS literature and demonstrate the value of blending
cognitive and affective evaluation frameworks.
The first major finding confirms that reliability is the dominant driver of customer satisfaction, consistent with
decades of service quality research (Agyapong, 2011; Kim, Park, & Jeong, 2004; Ranaweera & Prabhu, 2003).
In the Ghanaian context, this dominance is further amplified by the nation’s widespread dependence on mobile
data for daily economic transactions, education, financial inclusion, communication, and entertainment.
Research on African and emerging markets demonstrates that mobile communication systems increasingly
operate as foundational socio-economic infrastructure, supporting essential services and everyday activities
rather than discretionary consumption (Aker & Mbiti, 2010; Donner, 2015). Thus, even marginal disruptions in
call quality or data stability translate into substantial user dissatisfaction. This study reinforces earlier
observations that QoS shortcomings, particularly in network reliability, have disproportionately large impacts
on African mobile users due to limited alternative service options and infrastructural constraints (Oduro,
Boachie-Mensah, & Agyapong, 2018; Shava, 2021).
However, this study contributes beyond confirming these relationships by addressing how reliability shapes
satisfaction through emotional sentiment. The partial mediation effect of the Service Sentiment Index (SSI)
indicates that customers do not evaluate telecom service purely through rational judgments; instead, reliability
influences both cognitive assessments and affective experiences, which together drive satisfaction outcomes.
This finding aligns with multi-dimensional models of customer experience (Lemon & Verhoef, 2016) and with
the appraisal-emotion theories of consumer behaviour, which posit that service experiences elicit emotional
responses that mediate behavioural outcomes (Oliver, 2014; Ladhari, 2009). The evidence that experienced
sentiment significantly mediates the relationship between reliability and satisfaction suggests that any
improvement in network quality will translate not only into better ratings but also into more positive emotional
statesthereby enhancing overall satisfaction and potentially strengthening loyalty.
A second major contribution lies in the uncovering of sentiment divergence, a mismatch between expressed
sentiment (textual emotional tone) and experienced sentiment (numeric SERVQUAL-derived evaluations). This
divergence represents a critical extension to classical QoS theory. While SERVQUAL offers robust constructs
for measuring service performance, it has long been critiqued for insufficiently capturing emotional and
experiential nuances (Seth, Deshmukh & Vrat, 2005; Buttle, 1996). The present findings support these critiques:
more than half of respondents expressed negative emotions in their open-ended responses, despite relatively
moderate quantitative ratings on reliability, responsiveness, and empathy. This pattern mirrors findings from
emerging text-mining literature, which shows that customers often suppress emotional intensity in structured
ratings but reveal richer affective expressions in narrative comments (Ordenes et al., 2014; McColl-Kennedy et
al., 2019).
The sentiment divergence observed in this study provides new empirical support for the argument that customer
satisfaction is not a unidimensional construct. Rather, it comprises layered components: cognitive evaluations
(ratings), affective expressions (sentiment), and behavioural inclinations (recommendations, complaints). In
many cases, the affective layer may be more diagnostic of true dissatisfaction than structured ratings. For
example, customers may tolerate unreliable service due to perceived lack of alternatives or contractual lock-ins
(East et al., 2008; Dwivedi et al., 2021), yet still articulate frustration when given the freedom to express
themselves. This is especially pronounced in Ghana, where mobile telecommunication services have near-
universal penetration but vary in quality across regions, resulting in users who may remain with a provider
despite persistent grievances.
The thematic analysis of expressed sentiment provides additional context. Respondents frequently mentioned
network unreliability, high data costs, delays in resolving complaints, and concerns about billing accuracy. These
Page 696