
www.rsisinternational.org
International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering Management & Applied
Science (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN No. 2321-2705 | DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI |Volume XII Issue XI November 2025
community identity, were now appraised for their market value. The demand for Phulkari in colonial exhibitions
led to a rise in commissioned pieces for export, often under time constraints and specific aesthetic expectations.
This shifted the process from a meditative, familial labour of love into a hurried production to satisfy an external
gaze. Colonial economic policies, such as the import of British-made textiles and the taxation of Indian-made
goods, disrupted traditional livelihoods. Women’s embroidery became a survival strategy rather than a
celebratory or spiritual act, giving rise to an early, informal form of women’s entrepreneurship. Although this
shift did bring income into households, it also redefined women’s relationship with their craft—from a cultural
expression to a commodified task, distanced from the personal and ritualistic values it once held.
The introduction of industrialization and the push for mass production during the colonial period had a direct
effect on artisanal practices. The emergence of mechanized textile production led to the decline of handloom
and hand-embroidered textiles, including Phulkari. With a change already initiated in its narrative, it was
transformed from an intimate practice into a symbol of Punjabi cultural identity curated for outsiders. As a result,
the colonial administration's interest in Phulkari also led to its commodification (the action/process of treating
something as a mere commodity). Moreover, the colonial emphasis on industrialization and mass production led
to a decline in traditional crafts. The period marked the beginning of a shift in Phulkari's identity—from a symbol
of cultural expression to a marketable commodity.
Women artisans saw this as the silver lining of the entire situation. The embroidery was started to be mass-
produced for commercial purposes, with its traditional forms and methods altered to suit the demands of the
market. Phulkari had evolved from a family occupation to a significant mode of living for village women,
enhancing their economic independence and social status. “The embroidery, which started with hand-spun
khaddar with the use of untwisted silk floss (pat), represented leisure, imagination, and civilization, had now
been commercialised with the arrival of the British.”
5
They brought it out from the threads woven by women
confined within their homes, into the forefront of the markets—making it visible to all, and finally giving it the
attention and interest it deserved.
Even though the commercialization of Phulkari under colonialism was exploitative, it provided rural
women a way to cope with economic hardship—especially during displacement, poverty, and partition.
Women who traditionally embroidered for ceremonial use began to sell their works, either directly or through
traders. The Phulkari was the first type of women's enterprise in Punjab, although its commercial production
took away some of the creative freedom of women, their income provided them with more influence over family
decisions, their social status and gave them an opportunity to earn, preserve their heritage. It acted as a bridge
between tradition and livelihood, allowing women to step into the economy using a culturally rooted skill.
The craft allowed women to use a domestic skill—passed through generations—for income generation without
stepping outside patriarchal boundaries. Furthermore, the skills honed during colonial commercialization laid
the groundwork for post-independence cooperative movements, government training programs, and SHGs that
later empowered women artisans.
Maskiell, M. (1999). Embroidering the past: Phulkari textiles and gendered work as “tradition” and “heritage”
in colonial and contemporary Punjab.
The Journal of Asian Studies, 58(2), 361–388.Kaur, R., & Gupta, I. (2014). Phulkari and Bagh folk art of Punjab:
A study of changing designs from traditional to contemporary time. American International Journal of Research
in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 5(1), 35–43.
Contemporary Globalization and Commercialization - Innovation & Digital Growth (1980s – 2000s):
Post-independence modernisation, Western influence, and mass production diluted traditional practice. Restored
by campaigns by institutions like the Handicrafts Board and cultural figures like Kamala Devi Chattopadhyay,
Phulkari began re-emerging in exhibitions, museums, and fashion again. In the twentieth Century, Fresh
applications were discovered—file covers, bags, home decoration—and embroidery ended up on to lighter
fabrics like chiffon and georgette. Designs now tended to be more commonly printed and machine-served,