INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
Experimental Analysis of Green Concrete Incorporating Industrial  
and Agricultural Wastes  
1 Prachi Singh, 1 Sharad Kumar, 1 Ashutosh Singh, 2 Vikas Sharma  
1 School of Engineering & Technology, Shri Venkateshwara University, Gajraula, U.P. India  
2 Department of Computer Applications, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Delhi NCR Campus,  
Ghaziabad, U.P. India  
Received: 18 December 2025; Accepted: 23 December 2025; Published: 03 January 2026  
ABSTRACT  
The increasing demand for sustainable construction materials has encouraged the use of industrial and  
agricultural wastes as partial replacements for conventional concrete constituents. This paper presents an  
experimental analysis of green concrete incorporating selected industrial and agricultural waste materials with  
the objective of enhancing strength performance while reducing environmental impact. Various concrete mixes  
were prepared by partially replacing cement and fine aggregates with waste-derived materials in different  
proportions. Standard experimental tests were conducted to evaluate the mechanical properties of the  
developed green concrete, including compressive strength, split tensile strength, and flexural strength at  
different curing ages. The experimental results indicate that the incorporation of waste materials can  
significantly improve or maintain the strength characteristics of concrete when used in optimal proportions.  
Furthermore, the study demonstrates the potential of waste-based green concrete as a viable and eco-friendly  
alternative for conventional concrete, contributing to sustainable construction practices and effective waste  
management.  
KeywordsGreen concrete, Industrial waste, Agricultural waste, Sustainable construction, Compressive  
strength, Mechanical properties  
INTRODUCTION  
The rapid growth of the construction industry has led to an unprecedented demand for natural resources,  
particularly cement, fine aggregates, and coarse aggregates, resulting in significant environmental concerns.  
Conventional concrete production is highly energy-intensive and contributes substantially to global carbon  
dioxide emissions, primarily due to cement manufacturing. At the same time, large quantities of industrial and  
agricultural wastes are generated worldwide, posing serious challenges related to disposal, land use, and  
environmental pollution. These issues have motivated researchers and engineers to explore sustainable  
alternatives that can reduce the environmental footprint of concrete while maintaining or improving its  
mechanical performance. Green concrete has emerged as a promising solution by incorporating waste  
materials as partial replacements for traditional constituents, thereby promoting resource efficiency and  
environmental sustainability. Industrial wastes such as fly ash, ground granulated blast furnace slag, silica  
fume, marble dust, and steel slag are produced in large volumes as by-products of power plants and  
manufacturing industries. Similarly, agricultural wastes including rice husk ash, sugarcane bagasse ash,  
coconut shell powder, and wheat straw ash are abundantly available in agrarian regions. Improper disposal of  
these wastes not only leads to environmental degradation but also represents a loss of potentially valuable  
materials shown in Fig. 1. Many of these waste products possess pozzolanic or filler properties, which can  
contribute to improved strength development, durability, and microstructural refinement in concrete. Their  
effective utilization in concrete can therefore address both waste management challenges and sustainability  
goals in the construction sector.  
Page 625  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
Experimental Analysis of Green Concrete with Waste Material Replacements  
Green concrete incorporating industrial and agricultural wastes aims to minimize the consumption of virgin  
raw materials while reducing greenhouse gas emissions and overall construction costs. Partial replacement of  
cement with pozzolanic waste materials can lower heat of hydration, improve long-term strength, and enhance  
resistance to chemical attacks. Similarly, the use of agricultural waste ashes can improve particle packing and  
contribute to better bonding between the cement paste and aggregates. However, the performance of such  
green concrete is highly dependent on the type, quality, and proportion of waste materials used, as well as  
curing conditions and mix design parameters. Hence, systematic experimental investigations are essential to  
understand the strength development behavior of concrete containing these alternative materials. Previous  
studies have demonstrated that the incorporation of industrial wastes such as fly ash and slag can lead to  
improved compressive and tensile strength at later curing ages, while agricultural waste materials have shown  
potential in enhancing sustainability and reducing material costs. Nevertheless, variability in waste material  
composition and lack of standardized guidelines often limit their large-scale adoption. Additionally, the  
combined use of industrial and agricultural wastes in a single concrete mix remains an area that requires  
further experimental validation. Investigating such combinations can provide valuable insights into synergistic  
effects that may further enhance mechanical properties and environmental benefits. The present study focuses  
on the experimental analysis of green concrete incorporating selected industrial and agricultural wastes as  
partial replacements for cement and fine aggregates. The objective is to evaluate the influence of these waste  
materials on key mechanical properties such as compressive strength, split tensile strength, and flexural  
strength at different curing periods. By comparing the performance of green concrete mixes with that of  
conventional concrete, this research aims to identify optimal replacement levels that achieve a balance between  
strength development and sustainability. The findings of this study are expected to contribute to the growing  
body of knowledge on eco-friendly construction materials and support the adoption of green concrete in  
practical engineering applications, ultimately promoting sustainable development in the construction industry.  
LITERATURE REVIEW  
The incorporation of waste materials into concrete has gained considerable attention in recent years as a  
sustainable approach to reduce environmental impact and improve construction material efficiency. Parvez et al.  
[1] highlighted the potential of various industrial and agricultural wastes in concrete production, emphasizing  
their dual role in enhancing mechanical properties and promoting environmental responsibility. The study  
demonstrated that different types of waste materials, when used as partial replacements for cement and  
aggregates, can significantly contribute to sustainable civil construction by reducing the carbon footprint and  
minimizing landfill usage. Mahmoud et al. [2] investigated the effect of waste glass powder on the strength  
criteria of hardened concrete. Their experimental results indicated that incorporating finely ground waste glass  
can improve compressive strength and workability due to its pozzolanic activity, while also providing a  
practical solution for recycling non-biodegradable glass waste. Similarly, Rajendran et al. [3] explored the use  
of steel fibre-reinforced rubberized concrete beams, employing neural evaluation techniques to predict  
performance. The study emphasized the importance of hybrid approaches combining waste utilization with  
Page 626  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
advanced analytical tools to optimize strength and durability in modified concrete systems. The measurement  
and monitoring of concrete strength using smart devices have also been an area of focus. Abro et al. [4]  
developed a smart concrete strength measurement device capable of providing real-time and precise assessment  
of concrete performance, which is particularly beneficial when evaluating waste-incorporated concrete. This  
approach enables efficient validation of experimental results and ensures reliable mechanical characterization.  
Hamada and Abed [5] reviewed the sustainability of geopolymer concrete by analyzing the impact of plastic  
waste on strength and durability. The study highlighted that plastic waste incorporation not only enhances  
mechanical properties but also improves durability and reduces reliance on conventional cementitious materials.  
In terms of fiber reinforcement, Higuera-Flórez et al. [6] conducted a preliminary evaluation of recycled PET  
fiber-reinforced concrete, demonstrating improvements in tensile strength and crack resistance. This approach  
aligns with the concept of green concrete, where waste fibres contribute to structural performance while  
promoting circular economy principles. Agricultural waste utilization has also been explored; Hasibuan et al.  
[7] optimized the use of banana skin powder as a cementitious material using genetic algorithms, revealing  
significant potential for improving compressive strength while maintaining eco-friendly material usage. Kareem  
and Hilal [8] examined the use of waste glass as coarse aggregate in foamed concrete, employing Image J  
software for data analytics. The study demonstrated that proper processing and proportioning of waste materials  
can yield comparable or superior performance to conventional concrete. Likewise, Adetola et al. [9] analysed  
the microstructure of blended Guinea-corn stalk and sawdust ash in cement mixtures for interlocking concrete  
blocks, showing that agricultural waste can enhance mechanical performance while contributing to  
sustainability. Alkhaldi et al. [10] further emphasized the importance of industrial by-product waste, such as fly  
ash and GGBS, in producing sustainable concrete with improved compressive and tensile strength. The use of  
predictive modeling techniques for strength assessment has also gained traction; Zhang et al. [11] employed BP  
and Elman neural networks to predict compressive strength of recycled concrete, facilitating accurate design  
and optimization of waste-incorporated mixes. Sharifi et al. [12] provided insights into innovative concrete  
technologies, including translucent concrete, which integrates by-products while maintaining structural  
integrity, further illustrating the versatility of sustainable concrete applications. The enhancement of fire  
resistance in concrete through by-product incorporation was explored by Ali et al. [13], indicating that industrial  
and agricultural wastes can also improve thermal performance alongside mechanical strength. Akintayo and  
Olanrewaju [14] critically analysed ground granulated blast furnace slag in cement production, highlighting its  
effectiveness as a sustainable additive that enhances strength, durability, and long-term performance. Finally,  
Nguyen et al. [15] conducted both experimental and numerical investigations on steel-reinforced concrete  
columns utilizing recycled aggregates, confirming that waste-based concrete can meet structural requirements  
when appropriately designed and optimized.  
PROPOSED METHODOLOGY  
The proposed methodology presents a structured experimental framework to evaluate the strength development  
and performance of green concrete incorporating industrial and agricultural waste materials. The methodology  
is organized into systematic phases to ensure reliable material characterization, controlled mix preparation,  
accurate testing, and meaningful analysis of results. The following steps outline the complete methodological  
approach adopted in this study.  
1. Material Selection and Characterization: The methodology begins with the selection of conventional  
concrete ingredients, including Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC), natural fine aggregates, coarse aggregates,  
and potable water, which serve as control materials. Industrial wastes (such as fly ash, ground granulated blast  
furnace slag, or marble dust) and agricultural wastes (such as rice husk ash or sugarcane bagasse ash) are  
collected from local and reliable sources. These waste materials are processed through drying, grinding, and  
sieving to obtain uniform particle size. Preliminary characterization tests, including specific gravity, fineness,  
bulk density, and basic chemical composition, are conducted to assess their suitability for use in concrete and  
to understand their pozzolanic and filler properties.  
2. Concrete Mix Design and Proportioning: A control concrete mix is designed following standard mix  
design guidelines (IS or ASTM) for a selected target strength. Based on this reference mix, green concrete  
mixes are developed by partially replacing cement and/or fine aggregates with selected industrial and  
Page 627  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
agricultural waste materials at different replacement levels. Multiple mix proportions are prepared to study the  
influence of waste content on strength development. Care is taken to maintain comparable workability across  
all mixes by adjusting the watercement ratio or using admixtures if required. This systematic variation in mix  
composition allows the evaluation of optimal replacement percentages.  
3. Specimen Preparation and Casting: Concrete mixing is carried out using standard mixing procedures to  
ensure uniform distribution of materials. Fresh concrete is poured into standard moulds corresponding to  
different mechanical tests, such as cubes for compressive strength, cylinders for split tensile strength, and  
prisms for flexural strength. Proper compaction techniques, including manual rodding or vibration, are applied  
to eliminate air voids and achieve consistent density. After casting, specimens are covered to prevent moisture  
loss and are demoulded after 24 hours.  
4. Curing Process: Demoulded specimens are cured in a controlled water-curing environment at standard  
temperature conditions. Curing is carried out for predefined durations, typically 7, 14, and 28 days, to evaluate  
early-age and long-term strength development. Proper curing ensures complete hydration and allows the  
assessment of the pozzolanic contribution of industrial and agricultural waste materials over time.  
5. Mechanical Testing and Data Collection: At the end of each curing period, mechanical tests are conducted  
to determine the strength characteristics of both control and green concrete mixes. Compressive strength tests  
are performed using a compression testing machine, while split tensile and flexural strength tests are conducted  
using standardized loading setups. All tests are carried out in accordance with relevant testing standards, and  
multiple specimens are tested for each mix to ensure repeatability and statistical reliability. The obtained test  
results are systematically recorded for further analysis.  
6. Data Analysis and Performance Evaluation: The experimental results are analysed by comparing the  
strength performance of green concrete mixes with that of conventional concrete. Trends in strength  
development with respect to waste material type and replacement level are examined. Statistical and  
comparative analysis is used to identify optimal mix proportions that achieve maximum strength with reduced  
environmental impact. The findings are further discussed in terms of sustainability benefits, waste utilization  
efficiency, and practical applicability in construction. This comprehensive methodology ensures a reliable  
assessment of green concrete incorporating industrial and agricultural wastes.  
RESULT & ANALYSIS  
The experimental investigation focused on evaluating the mechanical properties of green concrete  
incorporating industrial and agricultural waste materials. The strength characteristics considered  
were compressive strength, split tensile strength, and flexural strength, measured at curing ages of 7, 14, and  
28 days. Concrete mixes were prepared by partially replacing cement with industrial wastes (fly ash, GGBS)  
and fine aggregates with agricultural waste (rice husk ash) at replacement levels of 0%, 10%, 20%, and 30%.  
1. Compressive Strength: The compressive strength of various concrete mixes was measured on 150 mm  
cubes. Table 1 summarizes the average compressive strength values obtained for different replacement levels  
at curing ages of 7, 14, and 28 days.  
Compressive Strength of Green Concrete (MPa)  
Cement  
Replacement (%)  
Fine Aggregate  
Replacement (%)  
Mix ID  
7 Days  
14 Days  
28 Days  
GC-0  
0
0
22.5  
28.3  
29.2  
30.1  
32.8  
GC-1  
GC-2  
10 (FA)  
20 (FA)  
10 (RHA)  
20 (RHA)  
23.1  
23.5  
34.1  
35.4  
Page 628  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
GC-3  
30 (FA)  
30 (RHA)  
22.0  
28.7  
33.0  
Incorporation of 1020% waste materials improved compressive strength compared to conventional concrete  
(GC-0), indicating positive pozzolanic reactions and improved particle packing. At 30% replacement, a slight  
decrease in strength was observed, likely due to insufficient cementitious material for complete hydration. The  
optimum replacement level was found to be 20% for both cement and fine aggregate, providing a 7.9%  
improvement in 28-day compressive strength.  
Development of Compressive Strength in Green Concrete Mixes  
Fig. 2. showing the compressive strength development of green concrete mixes GC-0, GC-1, GC-2, and GC-3  
at curing ages of 7, 14, and 28 days. For each mix, three bars represent strength at different curing periods. The  
chart indicates that compressive strength increases with curing age for all mixes, with GC-2 exhibiting the  
highest strength at 28 days, while GC-3 shows a slight reduction compared to GC-2.  
2. Split Tensile Strength: Split tensile strength tests were conducted on 150 × 300 mm cylinders.  
Split Tensile Strength of Green Concrete (MPa)  
Cement  
Replacement (%)  
Fine Aggregate  
Replacement (%)  
Mix ID  
7 Days  
14 Days  
28 Days  
GC-0  
0
0
2.2  
2.4  
2.5  
2.3  
2.7  
3.0  
3.2  
2.9  
3.2  
GC-1  
GC-2  
GC-3  
10 (FA)  
20 (FA)  
30 (FA)  
10 (RHA)  
20 (RHA)  
30 (RHA)  
3.5  
3.7  
3.3  
Split tensile strength followed a similar trend to compressive strength, with 20% replacement showing the  
highest improvement (approximately 15.6% increase at 28 days). The enhanced tensile strength can be  
attributed to the filler effect of fine particles and better interfacial bonding between aggregates and paste due to  
pozzolanic activity.  
Page 629  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
Variation of Split Tensile Strength with Curing Age  
Fig. 3. illustrating the split tensile strength of green concrete mixes GC-0, GC-1, GC-2, and GC-3 at curing  
ages of 7, 14, and 28 days. For each mix, three bars represent strength at different curing periods. The chart  
shows a consistent increase in split tensile strength with curing age for all mixes, with GC-2 achieving the  
highest 28-day tensile strength, while GC-3 exhibits slightly lower values compared to GC-2.  
3. Flexural Strength: Flexural strength tests were performed on 100 × 100 × 500 mm prism specimens.  
Flexural Strength of Green Concrete (MPa)  
Cement  
Replacement (%)  
Fine Aggregate  
Replacement (%)  
Mix ID  
7 Days  
14 Days  
28 Days  
GC-0  
0
0
3.0  
3.2  
3.4  
3.1  
3.5  
3.7  
3.9  
3.6  
4.0  
GC-1  
GC-2  
GC-3  
10 (FA)  
20 (FA)  
30 (FA)  
10 (RHA)  
20 (RHA)  
30 (RHA)  
4.4  
4.6  
4.1  
Flexural strength results confirm the positive influence of industrial and agricultural waste materials at optimal  
replacement levels. The 20% replacement mix achieved the highest flexural strength, showing approximately a  
15% improvement over conventional concrete at 28 days. Excessive replacement (30%) slightly reduced  
strength due to decreased cement content and potential workability issues.  
Development of Flexural Strength in Green Concrete Mixes  
Page 630  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
Fig. 4. showing the flexural strength of green concrete mixes GC-0, GC-1, GC-2, and GC-3 at curing ages of  
7, 14, and 28 days. For each mix, three bars represent flexural strength at different curing periods. The chart  
indicates that flexural strength increases with curing age for all mixes, with GC-2 achieving the highest 28-day  
flexural strength, while GC-3 shows slightly lower values compared to GC-2. The experimental results  
indicate that industrial and agricultural waste materials can effectively enhance the mechanical performance of  
concrete when used in optimal proportions. All three strength parameterscompressive, split tensile, and  
flexuraldemonstrated maximum improvement at 20% replacement, confirming the suitability of this  
proportion for sustainable green concrete. The study highlights the dual benefit of waste utilization: improved  
concrete performance and environmental sustainability through reduction in cement usage and effective  
management of industrial and agricultural residues.  
CONCLUSION  
The experimental investigation demonstrates that green concrete incorporating industrial wastes like fly ash  
and GGBS, along with agricultural wastes such as rice husk ash, can significantly enhance mechanical  
properties including compressive, split tensile, and flexural strengths, with the optimal replacement level found  
to be 20% for both cement and fine aggregates. The improvement is attributed to the pozzolanic activity, filler  
effect, and enhanced microstructural bonding provided by the waste materials, while simultaneously reducing  
environmental impact through decreased cement consumption and effective waste utilization. These findings  
confirm the feasibility of sustainable, eco-friendly concrete as a viable alternative to conventional materials  
without compromising structural performance. Future research can focus on long-term durability assessments  
under various environmental conditions, exploring additional waste materials and hybrid combinations,  
optimizing workability through admixtures, and conducting large-scale implementation, cost analysis, and  
lifecycle assessment to facilitate wider adoption in sustainable construction practices.  
REFERENCES  
1. S. Parvez, S. S. Afsar and I. Rahman, "Utilizing of Different Types Waste Materials Used in Concrete  
Production in Civil Construction: A Sustainable and Environmentally Responsible Approach," 2024  
International Conference on Communication, Computer Sciences and Engineering (IC3SE), Gautam  
Buddha Nagar, India, 2024, pp. 12-15, doi: 10.1109/IC3SE62002.2024.10593531.  
2. S. S. Mahmoud, S. M. Hama and A. S. Mahmoud, "Predicting Strength Criteria of Hardened Concrete  
Containing Waste Glass Powder," 2023 15th International Conference on Developments in eSystems  
Engineering  
(DeSE),  
Baghdad  
&
Anbar,  
Iraq,  
2023,  
pp.  
417-421,  
doi:  
10.1109/DeSE58274.2023.10099944.  
3. K. Rajendran, P. Murugesan, V. Palanisamy and S. Kannan, "Enhanced Neural Evalution of Steel Fibre  
Reinforced Rubberized Concrete Beams," 2025 12th International Conference on Computing for  
Sustainable  
Global  
Development  
(INDIACom),  
Delhi,  
India,  
2025,  
pp.  
1-6,  
doi:  
10.23919/INDIACom66777.2025.11115348.  
4. B. Abro, B. Lal, M. Aamir, S. L. Meghwar, F. A. Memon and Z. Hussain, "Smart Concrete Strength  
Measurement Device," 2022 International Conference on Emerging Technologies in Electronics,  
Computing and Communication (ICETECC), Jamshoro, Sindh, Pakistan, 2022, pp. 1-5, doi:  
10.1109/ICETECC56662.2022.10069766.  
5. H. Hamada and F. Abed, "Enhancing the Sustainability of Geopolymer Concrete: A Review on the  
Impact of Plastic Waste on Strength and Durability," 2024 ASU International Conference in Emerging  
Technologies for Sustainability and Intelligent Systems (ICETSIS), Manama, Bahrain, 2024, pp. 1-4,  
doi: 10.1109/ICETSIS61505.2024.10459550.  
6. C. Higuera-Flórez, J. Cárdenas-Pulido, J. Lizarazo-Marriaga, J. D. P. Suarez and S. L. U. C.,  
"Preliminary evaluation of mechanical properties of recycled PET fiber reinforced concrete," 2024  
Congreso Internacional de Innovación y Tendencias en Ingeniería (CONIITI), Bogotá, Colombia,  
2024, pp. 1-5, doi: 10.1109/CONIITI64189.2024.10854841.  
7. S. A. R. S. Hasibuan, H. Prayuda and M. Muhathir, "Optimization of Amount of Banana Skin Powder  
as Cementitious Materials in Concrete using Genetic Algorithm," 2023 International Workshop on  
Page 631  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
Artificial Intelligence and Image Processing (IWAIIP), Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 2023, pp. 204-208, doi:  
10.1109/IWAIIP58158.2023.10462849.  
8. M. A. Kareem and A. A. Hilal, "Data analytics to examine the use of waste glass as coarse aggregate in  
production of foamed concrete using Image J software," 2023 16th International Conference on  
Developments in eSystems Engineering (DeSE), Istanbul, Turkiye, 2023, pp. 368-372, doi:  
10.1109/DeSE60595.2023.10469317.  
9. S. Adetola, A. Oyejide, E. Emmanuel, S. Adejinle and J. Aiyegbabe, "Microstructural Analysis of  
blended Guinea-Corn Stalk and Saw-Dust Ash for Cement Mixture of Interlocking Concrete Block,"  
2024 International Conference on Science, Engineering and Business for Driving Sustainable  
Development  
Goals  
(SEB4SDG),  
Omu-Aran,  
Nigeria,  
2024,  
pp.  
1-6,  
doi:  
10.1109/SEB4SDG60871.2024.10629948.  
10. V. Alkhaldi, A. -H. I. Mourad and M. El Gamal, "Sustainable Concrete Using Industrial By-product  
Waste," 2022 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET),  
Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 2022, pp. 1-4, doi: 10.1109/ASET53988.2022.9734981.  
11. M. Zhang, J. Qu and Q. Qiu, "Prediction of compressive strength of recycled concrete (RC) based on  
BP and ELman neural networks," 2023 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and  
Autonomous Robot Systems (AIARS), Bristol, United Kingdom, 2023, pp. 140-144, doi:  
10.1109/AIARS59518.2023.00035.  
12. S. Sharifi, D. Navabi and A. Mosavi, "Translucent Concrete: Comprehensive Review of Concepts,  
Recent Technologies and Advances in Light Transmitting Concrete," 2023 IEEE 17th International  
Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics (SACI), Timisoara, Romania,  
2023, pp. 000685-000692, doi: 10.1109/SACI58269.2023.10158620.  
13. A. M. Ali, S. S. Ali, A. H. Wanas and M. M. Adnan, "Improvement The Concrete Fire Resistance by  
Using By-Product Materials," 2023 International Conference for Technological Engineering and its  
Applications in Sustainable Development (ICTEASD), Al-Najaf, Iraq, 2023, pp. 216-221, doi:  
10.1109/ICTEASD57136.2023.10585044.  
14. B. D. Akintayo and O. A. Olanrewaju, "Utilizing Industrial Waste for Sustainable Concrete: A Critical  
Analysis of Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag in Cement Production," 2024 IEEE International  
Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), Bangkok, Thailand,  
2024, pp. 1432-1438, doi: 10.1109/IEEM62345.2024.10857161.  
15. K. H. Nguyen, T. D. Tran and T. N. Phan, "Experimental and Numerical Investigation into the  
Compressive Strength of Steel-Reinforced Concrete Columns Utilizing Recycled Aggregates," 2025  
10th International Conference on Applying New Technology in Green Buildings (ATiGB), Danang,  
Vietnam, 2025, pp. 338-342, doi: 10.1109/ATiGB66719.2025.11142105.  
Page 632