INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
Design, Construction and Testing of a Model Thermosiphonic Solar  
Water Heater  
*Chikak Ishaya Gokir and Aliyy Muhammad Ajadi  
Department of Mechanical/Production Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Engineering  
Technology, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University, Bauchi  
*Corresponding Author  
Received: 18 December 2025; Accepted: 26 December 2025; Published: 05 January 2026  
ABSTRACT:  
A thermosiphonic solar water heating system that uses a simple flat plate collector to heat water and in which  
circulation takes place with natural convention. The system was designed, constructed and tested at Yelwa  
campus, ATBU Bauchi with latitude 10.330N and longitude 9.830E. The system was designed to heat a total of  
15litres of water between 500 and 800 at the worst and best month of the year respectively. The system was  
designed using weather data of Bauchi state and the resulting parameters of the design was used to construct the  
system. It was tested between December and January. Two tests were carried out on the system; for the system  
with ordinary collector, and that with diffusers incorporated within the collector risers. The first system (without  
diffusers) has an efficiency of 52.6% and was able to generate collector outlet temperature of 610C and water  
mean temperature of 600C at an average daily solar radiation of 912W/m2. In contrast, the second system (with  
diffusers) has an efficiency of 58.6% and was able to generate collector temperature of 700C and water mean  
temperature of 680C at an average daily solar radiation of 913.3W/m2. It was concluded from the results that  
incorporating diffusers within risers improved the performance of the system by 6.6%.  
INTRODUCTION  
Several challenges such as increase in oil demand and oil price rise, depletion of oil reserve, reduced availability  
of fossil fuels, ozone layer depletion, health hazards, global climate change and other air pollution issues caused  
mainly by burning of hydrocarbons as source of heat energy, has led to the drive to use environmental friendly  
and renewable alternatives sources of heat energy to eliminate or minimize these negative effects. Presently,  
solar and other alternative energy sources like wind and geothermal are being harnessed for various applications  
such as power generation, air conditioning, space heating, domestic hot water system etc.  
Supply of hot water account for a high level of energy demand in homes. This calls for the utilization of a cheap  
and renewable energy sources to provide an effective and efficient supply of hot water for maximum energy  
savings.  
Renewable energy resources of which the sun is a good example are those resources which undergo faster  
replenishment rate within a relatively short time than the rate at which they are utilized or depleted. The energy  
of the sun is generated from its nuclear fusion of its hydrogen into helium, with a resulting mass depletion rate  
of approximately 4.7x106tons/second. The earth’s population currently needs 15 terawatts of power in total, but  
the solar radiation that reaches the earth on a continuous basis amount to 120,000 terawatts; hence, just a fraction  
of the suns energy reaching the earth will cover the bulk of energy requirements. (Bradke et al., 2011)  
In harnessing the solar energy for heating, the solar radiation has to be converted to heat energy. Solar energy  
collectors, the device used to convert the solar radiation to heat, usually consist of a surface that efficiently  
absorbs radiation and convert this incident flux into heat which raises the temperature of the absorbing material.  
A part of this energy is then removed from the absorbing surface by means of heat transfer fluid that may either  
be liquid or gaseous.  
Page 744  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
Several systems have been built to convert solar energy to heat which are broadly classified into: focusing and  
non-focusing type concentrators. The simplest of which is the flat plate collector (non-focusing type), which  
uses a flat plate absorbing surface laid with grids of fluid carrying tubes for heat transfer. The flat plate collector  
absorber is made of high thermally efficient material usually copper or aluminium plate, painted with a selective  
black coating for high absorbing power. The flat plate is used where temperature needed is at a range of 40oc  
and 80oc and generally has an efficiency of about 40%. They have advantage of using both beam and diffused  
solar radiation, not requiring orientation toward the sun, no significant optical loss term; and requiring little  
maintenance.  
The aim of this project is to design, construct and test a model thermosiphonic solar water heater.  
Solar water heaters are classified based on the designs, which are adopted to suit a specific purposes and climatic  
conditions. Natural circulation solar water heaters (which are also called the thermosyphon water heater) are the  
simplest form of solar water heater due to its simplicity of construction, design, utilization and maintenance. The  
design choice is based on number of factors: economic, climatic, availability of materials among others. Design  
factors such as area of the collector, nature of the absorber plate material, storage tank capacity have been shown  
to affect the performance of natural circulation solar water heaters (Ismail et al., 2015).  
MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY  
System Design Assumptions  
In the design analysis of the system, the following assumptions were made:  
1. The collector operates in steady state.  
2. Temperature gradient through the cover thickness is negligible.  
3. There is one-dimensional heat flow through the back and side insulation and through the cover system.  
4. The temperature gradient around and through the tubes is negligible.  
5. The temperature gradient through the absorber plate is negligible.  
6. Fluid flow distribution is one dimensional.  
7. Temperature distributions in the collector tubes and the storage tank are linear.  
8. Flow inside the tubes is laminar and uniformly distributed.  
Design Considerations  
A solar domestic hot water system would be designed based on the following considerations:  
1. A design month which would be determined from the mean daily heat load (W) and the mean daily solar  
irradiance (W/m2) from the months of the year;  
2. The amount of water required to determine the system load;  
3. The range of operating temperatures between 00C and 1000C for the selection of material.  
Collector Area (AC)  
Collector area (AC) is the ratio of the quantity of heat required (Qw) to raise the temperature of water from Tin to  
Tout to the energy absorbed by the collector over a specified period of time. The collector area is given by (Nosa  
et al., 2013):  
Page 745  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
∆푇  
(
)
퐶표푙푙푒푐푡표푟 퐴푟푒푎 ꢀ  
=
=
… (1)  
휇퐼  
휇퐼  
And,  
(
)
(
)
= 휌푉퐶ꢅ푢ꢆ−ꢄ  
푖푛  
= ꢃꢅ푢ꢆ−ꢄ  
… (2)  
푖푛  
Where  
Qw = Useful energy absorb by the water  
µ= Viscosity of water at temperature 800C = 0.355kpa (EngineeringToolBox.com)  
I = average insolation constant  
Mw = Mass of water  
Cw = specific heat capacity of water  
ΔT = change in temperature of water  
Tin = water inlet temperature to the collector  
Tout = water outlet temperature from the collector  
Also,  
AC = LC × WC  
…(3)  
Where,  
LC is the length of collector (m)  
WC is the collector width (m)  
Volume of water on the collector plate is given by:  
휇×푅ꢇ  
푉 =  
… (4)  
ꢈ×퐷  
Where  
Re = Reynolds no. for lamina flow  
= Density of water  
µ = Viscosity of water at temperature 800C = 0.355kpa (EngineeringToolBox.com)  
D = Diameter of riser tubes (Nosa et al., 2013).  
Collector Risers and Headers  
2
휋퐷  
Total Volume of header, =  
… (5)  
… (6)  
4
2
휋퐷  
Total volume of risers,푉 =  
4
Page 746  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
Riser spacing =  
… (7)  
푛푢푚푏ꢇꢌ ꢅ푓 ꢌ푖푠ꢇꢌ푠  
Where,  
is the volume of the header  
is the diameter of the header  
is the length of the header  
is the volume of the risers  
is the diameter of the risers  
is the length of the risers  
WC is the collector width  
Design of the cold and hot water (Cylindrical) storage tank  
Volume of storage tank (VT) = Area (AT) × Height (HT)  
Where,  
2
휋퐷  
=  
…(8)  
…(9)  
4
Therefore,  
2
VT = 휋퐷푇  
4
And the diameter of the tank is given as  
4ꢑ  
ꢍ =  
…(10)  
휋퐻  
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION  
System Final Optimum Design Parameters  
Table 0 shows the system calculated optimum design parameters for the construction of the flat plate collector  
and storage tank (15liters capacity).  
Table 0: system parameters  
Description  
Value/Type  
Total aperture area, Ac  
Risers and headers tube material  
Number of riser tubes  
Number of header tubes  
0.5m2  
Copper  
9
2
Page 747  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
12mm  
Diameter of risers  
Diameter of headers  
Length of risers  
15mm  
0.855m each  
0.58m each  
Length of headers  
Absorber plate material  
Absorber plate coating  
Glazing  
Aluminum  
Black paint  
4mm glass  
Sawdust  
Collector insulation  
Collector tilt angle, β  
Storage tank material  
Storage tank capacity  
Diameter of storage tank  
Height of storage tank  
Storage tank insulation  
250  
PVC and mild steel  
15L  
210mm  
450mm  
Hard foam  
System Performance Testing  
In order to determine the overall system performance, two tests was conducted;  
a. the system performance with ordinary flat plate collector; and  
b. the system performance with diffusers incorporated within the risers of the collector.  
These systems were tested from 8am to 5pm. The water inlet temperature (Tin), collector outlet temperature  
(Tout), the water mean temperature in the storage tank, (Tmean), and the ambient temperature (Ta), was measured  
by a thermometer for each hour. Also, the solar radiation intensity (I) for each hour was measured by a  
pyranometer. Table 1 to Table 6 shows the results obtained for 3 days of testing for each systems.  
Table 1: Results obtained on Day 1 [for risers without diffusers]  
Time  
8am  
794  
20  
9am  
858  
22  
10am  
940  
23  
11am  
984  
24  
12pm  
996  
26  
1pm  
991  
26  
2pm  
986  
26  
3pm  
930  
26  
4pm  
864  
26  
5pm  
460  
25  
I (W/m2)  
Ta (0C)  
Tin(0C)  
Tout (0C)  
Tmean(0C)  
24  
28  
33  
42  
46  
55  
57  
58  
58  
58  
26  
32  
37  
44  
48  
56  
59  
60  
58  
58  
25  
28  
33  
42  
46  
55  
57  
58  
58  
58  
Page 748  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
Table 2: Results obtained for Day 2 [for risers without diffusers]  
Time  
8am  
836  
18  
9am  
956  
19  
10am  
958  
20  
11am  
973  
24  
12pm  
998  
26  
1pm  
988  
26  
2pm  
976  
28  
3pm  
978  
28  
4pm  
930  
26  
5pm  
533  
26  
I (W/m2)  
Ta (0C)  
Tin(0C)  
Tout (0C)  
Tmean(0C)  
24  
28  
33  
40  
49  
56  
58  
60  
59  
58  
22  
32  
36  
42  
52  
57  
60  
61  
60  
58  
20  
28  
33  
40  
49  
56  
58  
60  
59  
58  
Table 3: Results obtained for Day 3 [for risers without diffusers]  
Time  
8am  
93.6  
13  
9am  
256  
13  
10am  
400  
22  
11am  
440  
24  
12pm  
460  
25  
1pm  
430  
27  
2pm  
458  
27  
3pm  
301  
27  
4pm  
297  
24  
5pm  
98  
I (W/m2)  
Ta (0C)  
Tin(0C)  
Tout (0C)  
Tmean(0C)  
24  
23  
26  
28  
34  
40  
46  
48  
50  
50  
48  
23  
29  
32  
38  
43  
48  
50  
50  
50  
48  
23  
26  
28  
34  
40  
46  
48  
50  
50  
48  
Table 4: Results obtained for Day 4 [for risers with diffusers]  
Time  
8am  
90.1  
20  
9am  
300  
20  
10am  
397  
22  
11am  
399  
23  
12pm  
468  
24  
1pm  
455  
24  
2pm  
392  
26  
3pm  
321  
25  
4pm  
164  
25  
5pm  
60.5  
22  
I (W/m2)  
Ta (0C)  
Tin(0C)  
Tout (0C)  
Tmean(0C)  
23  
25  
28  
34  
40  
46  
50  
51  
50  
50  
24  
26  
32  
37  
42  
48  
51  
51  
50  
50  
22  
25  
28  
34  
40  
46  
50  
51  
50  
50  
Table 5: Results obtained for Day 5 [for risers with diffusers]  
Time  
8am  
827  
24  
9am  
848  
25  
10am  
866  
25  
11am  
998  
27  
12pm  
1001  
28  
1pm  
1010  
30  
2pm  
994  
32  
3pm  
930  
33  
4pm  
900  
33  
5pm  
638  
32  
I (W/m2)  
Ta (0C)  
Tin(0C)  
Tout (0C)  
25  
30  
38  
42  
54  
60  
64  
66  
66  
66  
28  
36  
40  
46  
56  
62  
66  
68  
66  
66  
Page 749  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
Tmean(0C)  
25  
30  
38  
42  
54  
60  
64  
66  
66  
66  
Table 6: Results obtained for Day 6 [for risers with diffusers]  
Time  
8am  
883  
25  
9am  
896  
27  
10am  
860  
27  
11am  
980  
26  
12pm  
986  
27  
1pm  
1001  
28  
2pm  
1020  
29  
3pm  
998  
30  
4pm  
860  
29  
5pm  
649  
27  
I (W/m2)  
Ta (0C)  
Tin(0C)  
Tout (0C)  
Tmean(0C)  
25  
32  
41  
48  
56  
62  
66  
68  
68  
68  
28  
34  
42  
52  
58  
63  
68  
70  
68  
68  
25  
32  
41  
48  
56  
62  
66  
68  
68  
68  
The graphs Fig.1 to 6 below shows the rate of change of the collector output temperature (To) and the water  
mean temperature (Tm) within the storage tank for each test days respectively.  
70  
60  
50  
40  
To  
Tm  
30  
20  
10  
0
8
9
1 0  
1 1  
1 2  
1 3  
1 4  
1 5  
1 6  
1 7  
TIME (HRS)  
o
Fig. 1: graph of collector outlet temperature (To C) & water mean temperature (Tm oC) against time (hrs) for  
Day 1  
70  
60  
50  
40  
To  
Tm  
30  
20  
10  
0
8
9
1 0  
1 1  
1 2  
1 3  
1 4  
1 5  
1 6  
1 7  
TIME (HRS)  
o
Fig. 2: graph of collector outlet temperature (To C) & water mean temperature (Tm oC) against time (hrs) for  
Day 2  
Page 750  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
60  
50  
40  
30  
20  
10  
0
To  
Tm  
8
9
1 0  
1 1  
1 2  
1 3  
1 4  
1 5  
1 6  
1 7  
TIME (HRS)  
o
Fig. 3: graph of collector outlet temperature (To C) & water mean temperature (Tm oC) against time (hrs) for  
Day 3  
60  
50  
40  
30  
To  
Tm  
20  
10  
0
8
9
1 0  
1 1  
1 2  
1 3  
1 4  
1 5  
1 6  
1 7  
TIME (HRS)  
o
Fig. 4: graph of collector outlet temperature (To C) & water mean temperature (Tm oC) against time (hrs) for  
Day 4  
80  
70  
60  
50  
40  
To  
30  
Tm  
20  
10  
0
8
9
1 0  
1 1  
1 2  
1 3  
1 4  
1 5  
1 6  
1 7  
TIME (HRS)  
o
Fig. 5: graph of collector outlet temperature (To C) & water mean temperature (Tm oC) against time (hrs) for  
Day 5  
Page 751  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
80  
70  
60  
50  
40  
30  
20  
10  
0
To  
Tm  
8
9
1 0  
1 1  
1 2  
1 3  
1 4  
1 5  
1 6  
1 7  
TIME (HRS)  
o
Fig. 6: Graph of collector outlet temperature (To C) & water mean temperature (Tm oC) against time (hrs) for  
Day 6  
System Performance Evaluation  
The first system tests (without diffusers within risers) were conducted on Day 1, 2 and 3 respectively. The system  
was able to generate collector outlet temperature of up to 610C and mean water temperature of up to 600C at an  
average daily solar radiation of 912.6W/m2. Also, the second tests (with diffusers incorporated within risers),  
were conducted on Day 4, 5 and 6 respectively. The system generated collector outlet temperature of up to 700C  
and mean water temperature of up to 680C at an average daily solar radiation of 913.3W/m2.  
Comparing the results obtained both systems, it can be deduced that incorporating diffusers in the collector tube  
risers improved the efficiency of the system by up to 6.6%. It can also be deduced from the graphs fig. 4, 5 and  
6 above that the temperature difference between the collector outlet temperature (To) and the mean water  
temperature (Tmean) was at most 20C, which shows that the diffusers had no significant effect on the heating time  
of system.  
Physical impact of diffusers on the Reynold’s number or laminar flow distribution  
Although the nominal Reynolds number of the working fluid remains within the laminar regime, the insertion  
of diffusers induces localized flow separation, secondary circulation, and periodic boundary-layer  
redevelopment. As a result, the flow departs from classical fully developed laminar behavior, leading to  
enhanced convective heat transfer without a formal transition to turbulence  
CONCLUSION  
A thermosiphon water heater was successfully constructed to heat 15liters of water above 700C under the climatic  
conditions of Bauchi, ATBU Yelwa Campus. It was also discovered that incorporating diffusers at the collector  
risers improved the system efficiency by up to 6.6% compared with the ordinary collector.  
REFERENCE  
1. Abdollah R., & Hessam T., (2011). Experimental investigation on the performance of thermosyphon  
solar water heater in the South Caspian Sea, Thermal Science, 15, 447456.  
2. Bradke C., Doetsch H., Huhn D., Radloff T., et al (2011). Researching: Energy,  
Scientific Organizations, Germany, 2011.  
brochure, Alliance of  
3. Chuawittayawuth K., & Kumar S., (2002). Experimental investigation of temperature  
and  
flow  
distribution in a thermosyphon solar water heating system, Renewable Energy, 26, 431448.  
Page 752  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
4. Duffie J., & Beckman W., (1991). Solar engineering of thermal processes, 2nd  
Edition,  
Toronto:  
John Wiley and Sons.  
5. Fallziah S., & Balbir M., (2003). Simulation of convective heat transfer  
tube of a parabolic trough concentrator.  
coefficient in the receiver  
6. Fanney A., & Klein S., (1985). Thermal Performance Comparisons for Solar Hot Water  
Subjected to Various collector array flow rate. Proceeding of Inyersci. 85, Montreal, Canada  
System  
7. Govind K., Shireesh B., & Santanu B., (2008). Design of solar thermal systems  
utilizing pressurized  
hot water. Solar Energy, 82 (23), 686699.  
8. Govind K., Shireesh B., & Santanu B., (2006) Determination of design space and optimization of solar  
water heating systems. Solar Energy, 32 (6), 263-276.  
9. Hay E., & Davies A., (1980). Calculations of the solar radiation incident on an  
inclined surface. In:  
Hay, J.E., Won, T.K. (Eds.), Proc. of First Canadian Solar Radiation Data Workshop, 59. Ministry of  
Supply and Services, Canada. 101  
Page 753