INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
Managerial Competencies of Officers and Financial Performance of  
Selected Agricultural Micro Cooperatives in The Province of Isabela  
Alan V. Bautista  
Isabela State University  
Received: 20 December 2025; Accepted: 31 December 2025; Published: 06 January 2026  
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND DEDICATION  
A “thank you very much” would not suffice to express the heartfelt gratitude of the researcher to all those in one  
way or another are part of the accomplishing of this masterpiece. Foremost, the researcher-author, with a prayer,  
is beholden to the Almighty God as part of His plan and design for this noble achievement. Secondly, he is  
grateful to his beloved wife Marivic for all the understanding and so much love bestowed to the author especially  
in the course of his doctorate study. Also, so much gratitude is bestowed to his family especially his biological  
mother Violeta, and his surrogate mother Mama Pita, for both their instinctive overflowing motherly love and  
support to all endeavors specially to the quest for a continuing learning of the author. In the same manner a  
message of gratitude is conveyed to his elder brother, Alvio, sisters, Adela and Audrey and their respective  
families, a message of utmost gratitude and in memory of the author’s beloved father, Alfredo, and to his son  
Alfie, this masterpiece is lovingly and eternally dedicated.  
The researcher-author would also like to acknowledge the Isabela State University, especially its Cabagan  
Campus, the university officials from the President to fellow faculty members and staff, notably in the College  
of Business Management led by its Dean, Dr. Daniel C. Jacinto and the BSAB program faculty, humbly  
recognizing and conveying a personal gratitude for the all the support and assistance to this remarkable  
achievement.  
Utmost gratitude is also conveyed to his Dissertation study adviser, Dr. Ali G. Mamaclay for his invaluable  
guidance and assistance and to all the Wesleyan University-Philippines Graduate School faculty and staff, thank  
you so much.  
To his beloved family relatives and all friends, especially Dr. Jayson C. Atal and surrogate brother, Jhay M.  
Laddaran and to the D’Muse All Beacon Journey this accomplishment is dedicated. Message of profound  
gratitude is also conveyed to the 185 cooperative officers and the general membership of the 37 agricultural  
micro cooperatives for their valuable cooperation and support as the main subject of this dissertation study.  
Additionally, he acknowledges the Cooperative Development Authority (CDA) Region 02-Extension Office, to  
its Regional Director and all its other personnel, notably Sir Fernando T. Soriano, Sir Christopher Y. Corrales  
and Ma’am Elsie O. Pacis, for their assistance specially to the needed data and information and their valuable  
knowledge so significant toward the completion of this dissertation study.  
Lastly, the author expresses his gratitude to all his other acquaintances and entities which in one way or another  
were significant part toward the accomplishment of this dissertation study. This masterpiece with heartfelt  
gratitude is humbly dedicated.  
ABSTRACT  
Cooperatives in the Philippines to this present day already existed for more than a century since its legislated  
amalgamation to the socio-economic governance of the country in 1916. Throughout those more than 100 years,  
it has its successes and failures of which management is a crucial factor. This study investigated further the  
managerial competency of cooperative officers and financial performance of selected agricultural micro  
cooperatives in the province of Isabela. Data were gathered from all the selected 37 only compliant cooperative  
Page 790  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
represented by 185 officers as respondents. The study mainly sought to answer if there is relationship between  
cooperative officers and managerial performance, cooperatives profile and financial performance and core  
managerial competency and cooperative financial performance of cooperatives. The study revealed that majority  
of the selected agricultural micro cooperatives served as respondents of this study had a fair financial  
performance rating, that only educational attainment variable had significant correlation with managerial  
competency. The cooperative cooperatives profile and financial performance was found of having no significant  
relationship and there is no significant correlation of the managerial competencies and cooperative financial  
performance. Based on the findings of the study a proposed action plan was formulated for the agricultural micro  
cooperatives. Notably recommended that the Cooperative Development Authority and other government and  
private entities and stakeholders in the administration, supervision and supporting the cooperatives may conduct  
necessary, relevant and timely trainings or continuing education and other development initiatives and actions  
to assist more the agricultural micro cooperative to have a reliable and accurate Management Information System  
and data analytics useful in decision-making specially to achieve a sound financial performance.  
Keywords: Agricultural Micro Cooperatives, Cooperative Officers, Managerial Competency, Financial  
Performance.  
INTRODUCTION  
In spite of the relatively successes of cooperatives in the Philippines cooperatives, however at present there are  
still critical and immediate factors to be explored and necessitating an in depth study essential in decisions and  
actions leading in taking more advantage of the opportunities in cooperatives for its continuing and sustainable  
contribution to the country’s socio-economic development. Notably per Cooperative Development Authority  
(CDA) records there is a concerning substantial decrease of the number of cooperatives in the country from the  
past years, from more the 25,000 in 2015 down to more than 20,000 cooperatives in 2022 (CDA Annual Reports,  
2015, 2022). The decline is caused by already commonly identified known factors such as management  
incompetency, inadequate understanding of cooperative principles and practices and purposes, improper use of  
credits by the borrowers (Ballesteros & Acheta, 2020). Additionally, political “dynamics”, the still strong  
influence of individualistic attitude over the essence of cooperation among people and several limiting factors  
of the government and other cooperative stakeholders in promoting and advancing of cooperativism exacerbate  
the common plagues affecting the cooperative movement in the country.  
Success and failure of organization such as cooperatives in achieving its purpose and mandate depends upon  
several factors and other variables affecting its management and operation, that premise was based on a long and  
substantial experience since the onset of scientific management. The factors and variables includes human  
behavior in organization, developed, practiced and emerging management principles, practices and theories such  
as competency based management competency in peoples’ organization like cooperatives.  
Rationale  
This study on cooperatives in the province of Isabela was conceptualized on the framework of determining the  
managerial competency of cooperative officers and its correlative effect to the financial performance of selected  
agricultural micro cooperatives in the province.  
Cooperatives by history emerged in Europe in the 18th century as socio- economic movement evolved into  
organization by group of people with a common bond of interest, existed and thriving with a certain degree of  
autonomy.  
In the Philippines, it was in 1916 under the Rural Credit Law that gave birth to cooperatives, recognized as of  
the movement in Southeast Asia. Since then its impact to the socio-economic progress and development of the  
Philippines is remarkable. Already existing for more than a century since it began, the government and the  
Filipino people sustainably enliven the progress and development of cooperatives in the country. It is exhibited  
in the enabling government policies and laws such as the RAs’ 9520, the Philippine Cooperative Code of 2008,  
11384, the Cooperative Development Authority Charter of 2019 and recently RA 11535 of 2021 mandating the  
creation of the position of Cooperative Development Officer (CDO) in the municipal, city, and provincial level  
Page 791  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
of local governance. Indeed cooperative is an inevitable and effective instrumentality to spur and drive further  
the socio-economic development of the country.  
Considering the cooperatives unfortunate experiences, which are certainly akin around the world, the commonly  
identified fundamental cause of problems and failure of cooperatives is rooted in the incompetency of  
management. Numerous studies both local and foreign conclusively validates that fundamental cause. As  
commented by a prominent Filipino economist “The larger cooperatives have increased in number, but the  
smaller ones have decreased. The determining factor is management capability.” (Ordonez, 2021).  
This study was premised on the major factor causing the failures and decline of Philippines cooperatives,  
incompetency in management. Facts such as above cited implies that there is a necessity for a continuing to  
investigate and study the causal factors. Findings and result of this study is purposely aimed to shed and acquire  
further knowledge and understanding of certain aspects in cooperative management in the Philippines. Lastly,  
an ultimate objective of this proposed study is to provide information and knowledge necessary for possibly  
resolving some issues, problems and to effect innovative changes in the governance of cooperative in the  
Philippines.  
LITERATURE REVIEW  
This literature review appraises, substantiate and partially validates prior or existing knowledge and  
understanding of cooperatives both in the Philippines and around the world. It is also the main basis of the  
motivation, goals and objectives of the intent of proposing this study. Moreover, these related literatures served  
as references in formulation the conceptual framework of this proposed study.  
Cooperative Officers Managerial Competency and Organizational Performance  
A study on managers’ competency and improving cooperative performance and sustainability in China by Yu et  
al. (2022) suggested that authorities and advocates of cooperatives should look more upon the impact of  
cooperatives managers’ competencies related to performance and to broaden the performance evaluation and  
incentive initiatives for agricultural cooperative managers. The study also suggested that cooperatives may  
consider providing avenues for motivation of cooperative managers to improve their competencies as it may  
correlate with organizational performance. The study further recommended that agricultural cooperative  
managers’ competency evaluation result could be used as a strong basis in granting and distribution of benefits,  
thus developing a system or culture of higher competency results to higher performance and so with higher  
benefits and rewards.  
A study in Kenya by Ngumo (2021) about management competency and performance cited that competencies  
could be used to determine the individual manager job performance as it is not affected by socio-economic  
factors like race, gender, etc. The study posited that business organizations’ performance is a factor of quality of  
management which is significantly a result of management competence, it is because organization generate more  
and more benefits from organization’s assets if core managerial competences utilize the potentials of those  
resources maximally. The study emphasizes that management competencies necessary be develop and cultivated  
into organizational core competencies that will provide to competitive advantages resulting to an improved  
organizational performance.  
In a study by Haryono et al. (2020) conducted in Indonesia concluded that “the implementation of a more  
effective business strategy will be able to improve the welfare of members of women cooperatives that are  
sustainable. Besides, the application of this business strategy is also able to mediate the effect of competence on  
improving the welfare of women cooperative members. This means that increasing the welfare of women  
cooperative members will be more effective when the competencies of business actors are improved and  
subsequently the skills of the business actors are applied by practicing business strategies which will further  
improve the welfare of the members of the sustainable business actors”.  
A study by Hailemariam (2019) in Ethiopia about competencies of cooperative committees found out that  
cooperatives management committees were ineffective in leading certain aspects such as strategic leadership  
Page 792  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
and other task management of cooperatives. As to leadership competencies, the study found out that few  
cooperative managers have substantial experience and interest in leadership that mostly of the cooperative  
leaders’ have insufficient knowledge about cooperation and management. Additionally, the study revealed that  
mostly of cooperative leaders possessed more of human skills, however they are insufficient both in conceptual  
and technical skills. Lastly, the study recommended that to enhance the leadership of cooperative managers’  
effectiveness and competencies, a training and development program should be provided by the government and  
other cooperative stakeholders.  
A study by Veliu and Manxhari (2017) on the impact of managerial competencies on business performance of  
small and medium enterprises in Kosovo, the study supported the management theoretical model of espousing  
that a more managerial competencies attributes are intermediaries among personal and professional  
characteristics with business performance. The correlation between managerial competencies were observed to  
have significantly affect business performance. The study found out that some factors influenced managerial  
competencies toward better organizational performance. The study recommended that further research to be  
conducted to determine managerial competency focused on specific level of management. The study cited  
emphatically the importance of looking beyond individual basic skills. The study premised that if organizations  
work rigorously to actualize necessary managerial competencies and implement appropriate tasking it prevent  
unnecessary costs, unsatisfied customers and lost opportunities leading to demand creation and business  
enterprise position in the market. Lastly, the study concluded that evidently combinations of managerial  
competencies (professional, social and personal) have significant effect on the performance of small and medium  
business enterprises in Kosovo.  
A study by Masuku et al. (2016) on the performance of multipurpose cooperatives in Swasiland concluded that  
there is a high level of accountability in multi-purpose cooperatives. Committees are significantly  
knowledgeable on managing cooperatives and as employees had appropriate and relevant training for their  
respective jobs. The study revealed that committee’s resiliency and hard work leads toward attaining  
profitability. However, the study also found out that Multi-Purpose Cooperatives (MPCs) lacks in strong  
coordination between members of the committee and cooperative general membership. The study also found out  
weakness in accountability in cooperatives, such work shortfall in accountability for the work performed in the  
cooperatives resulted to a low general membership participation in the overall affairs and management of  
cooperatives. Inability to comprehend the cooperatives financial reports as a consequence of inadequate  
education of cooperative membership may lead to below par performance of multi-purpose cooperatives. The  
study found out that respectively gender and accountability affects the multi-purpose cooperatives performance  
negatively and positively. Lastly, the study concluded similarly with other types of cooperatives, the  
performance of multi-purpose cooperatives were adversely weak or inadequate capital base, aging members  
failing to satisfactorily perform their duties and responsibilities aggravating more the effect of cooperatives  
mismanagement of funds and occurrence pilferage and burglary.  
In Philippines, currently there is limited studies from the past decade regarding managerial competencies  
specifically its correlation with cooperative operational performance. Latest published study conducted in the  
province of Ifugao by Chungyas, and Trinidad (2022), The study found a significant relationship between  
cooperatives strategic management and  
financial performance. It is evident in the analysed cooperatives  
financial statements where there is a progression on the trend of Net Profit Margin, Return on Asset (ROA) and  
Return on Equity (ROE) financial performance indicators. The respondent multi-purpose cooperatives in Ifugao  
also shown a strong relationship between their strategic management and operational performances  
Additionally, a study conducted in the province of Isabela by Cammayo (2018) problems encountered by  
cooperatives were identified, are manageable though appeared to effect limitations to the cooperatives in  
achieving financial viability and sustainability. Foremost in the identified problems is the insufficiency of  
operational capital as observed by cooperative senior managers. Study results also show that there was no  
intensified capital build up programs of the cooperatives. Furthermore, significant portion of the cooperative net  
surpluses were given back as patronage refund and interest on share capital to the cooperative members. Though  
the scheme is the foremost wealth generation mechanism of cooperatives, study revealed it has no significant  
impact on the growth of cooperatives membership.  
Page 793  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
Lastly, a study conducted in Oroquieta City by Binaoro (2015), assessment the cooperative officers’ leadership  
competencies. The study objectives focused in determining the cooperative officers’ leadership competencies,  
specifically in directing and initiating change, leadership and results-oriented and determining the relationship  
among cooperative officers’ demographic, socio-economic attributes and their leadership competencies. A total  
of 100 cooperative officers served as respondents of the study from the 13 cooperatives in Oroquieta City. Study  
results shows that officers were mostly at the above average level in competency aspects being examined as  
revealed by the overall mean. The study concluded and recommended that possible interventions should focus  
more in cooperatives goal attainment and developing cooperative officers to be more proactive and vibrant in  
the aspect of leading.  
History of Cooperative  
Cooperation existed together with the dawn of human being, as the adage saying “No man is an island”. Human  
being survive and evolve finding ways to further strive and improve their lives. Basically, hunting for food,  
construct shelter, and created devices for protection are the means of the earliest human civilizations to thrive  
and further develop.  
The earliest known documented existence of a formal group cooperative movement was from Fenwick, Scotland  
in March 14, 1761, a group of local cottage weavers processed sacks of oatmeal and marketed at a discounted  
price. The group coherently developed a bond and became known as the Fenwick Weavers' Society.  
Succeeding records of formal cooperation for socio-economic reason began from small countryside  
organizations in Western Europe, North America and Japan from late eighteenth to middle of the nineteenth  
century. Well documented and known of which the Rochdale Pioneers of Scotland is recognized and exemplified  
the operation and management as an ideal cooperative society in 1844. Succeeding, in Germany a group led by  
Friedrich Wilhelm Raiffeisen and Franz Hermann Schultz Delitsch. Raiffeisen and Schultz-Delitsch organized  
an independent credit union which operates in a cooperative system eventually becoming a model of credit  
unions starting in 1862. The model successfully grew and replicated in other sectors of economy eventually  
spreading the growth of financial cooperatives throughout the world.  
Philippine Cooperatives  
Sourced from the publications of the Cooperative Development Authority (CDA) of the Philippines, the  
government agency mandated for governance of the country’s cooperatives, the beginnings of the Philippine  
cooperative movement was documentarily foremost recognized from its national hero Dr. Jose P. Rizal.  
Influenced from his dwellings in Europe, he was motivated with the achievement of a new economic initiative,  
the cooperatives as it substantially changed the Europeans economic and social way of life. He organized the  
first known documented oraganized cooperative in 1896 purposely for agricultural marketing in Dapitan,  
Zamboanga del Norte, it was an actualization of his knowledge and effort to practice and cultivate cooperation  
among Filipinos. He also established a school for the economically unfortunates on a entirely system of  
cooperation, additionally a cooperative store was also established. He also organized and managed a group of  
abaca farmers into cooperative known then as the La Sociedad de los Abacaleros (Society of Abaca Producers).  
Furthermore, Teodoro Sandiko, a legislator from Bulacan province influenced by the German cooperative  
banking model, the Raiffeisen movement prepared and proposed the 1915 Rural Credit Act. In 1916 under the  
Bureau of Agriculture the first rural credit associations to help farmers were formed. The Act was eventually  
made into law recognizing Teodoro Sandiko already a governor at that time as the forefather of cooperation or  
formal cooperative movement in the country.  
The Rural Credit Law was initially administered by the Bureau of Agriculture. Under the law the first rural credit  
association was organized October 18,1916. Also in the same year, in the College of Agriculture, Los Baños,  
Laguna, the first Consumers Cooperative was organized.  
Page 794  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
It was on December 9, 1927 enacted and approved Cooperative Marketing Law (Act 2425). In Vigan, Ilocos,  
Sur, the first Credit Union was established in 1938. The Commonwealth Act No. 565 or The Cooperative Law  
was passed in 1940 it regulates the organization and operation of Credit and Consumers Cooperative. Philippines  
Congress in 1952 approved the Republic Act 821 recognizing the important role of farmers in the social structure  
and their significant contribution to the country’s economic development. The law also created an administrative  
agency Agricultural Credit and Cooperative Financing Administration (ACCFA). Farmers’ Cooperative  
Marketing Associations (FACOMAs) were organized and created by the government through ACCFA, financed  
thru provision of collateral free loans. In 1957, the Philippine Non-Agricultural Cooperative Act (RA No. 2023)  
was passed by the Philippines congress. The law enabled the people to develop their enterprises thru  
cooperatives. In 1960, the Agricultural Credit Cooperative Institute (ACCI) was established.  
PD No. 175, Letter of Instruction (LOI) 23 was promulgated in 1973. The LOI consolidated all cooperative  
laws to unify and harmonized the administration and further development of cooperatives thru establishment of  
the Bureau of Cooperative Development. In 1987, the Bureau of Agricultural Cooperatives Development  
(BACO) was established under the Ministry of Agriculture and Food per Executive Order No. 116. BACO was  
tasked to come-up with a coordinating integrated system for development, evaluation and extending assistance  
in the organization and administration of agricultural cooperatives in the countryside. Republic Acts No. 6938,  
the Cooperative Code of the Philippines and No. 6939 creating the Cooperative Development Authority (CDA)  
were both signed into law in 1990. RA 6938 was to rationalize and unify all existing cooperative laws and CDA  
was created as authority for the regulation and governance of cooperatives in the country, RA 6939 was repealed  
by RA 11364, the Cooperative Development Authority Charter of 2019, reorganizing and strengthening the  
CDA. In February 17, 2009, the Republic Act No. 9520 or the Philippine Cooperative Code of 2008 was signed  
into law, which amended RA 6938 purposely to cope up with the challenges of domestic and global economic  
development specially the onset of information technology. Moreover, the enactment of RA 11535 of 2021  
mandating the creation of the position of Cooperative Development Officer (CDO) in the municipal, city, and  
provincial level expectedly this is to spur the establishment of more cooperatives and strengthening the existing  
one and to enable cooperatives to contribute more to the country’s socio-economic growth (Cooperative  
Development Association, 2021).  
Competency  
Concept and application of competence are traced back as far as 3000 years ago. It was in China when a written  
civil service examination was required to replace the customary recommendations from authority or superiors  
as basis for qualification for government employment. Apprenticeship training was a traceable beginning in the  
medieval age, apprentices acquire skills by working with a master after acquiring and reaching a set of specific  
workmanship standard a competency credential is awarded. On the onset of industrial era, significant socio-  
economic transformation took place in major economic sectors such as agriculture, production, manufacturing  
and transportation also scientific approach to work and jobs and the needed skills emerged which is the birth  
scientific management . On the 20th century, social efficiency flourished led by the United States. In 1991,  
modern management theorists and proponents led by the acclaimed father of scientific management, Frederick  
W. Taylor, proposed the practice of division of labor, jobs simplification, extending of managerial control  
throughout the workplace and application of systematic time and motion study for cost accounting. Along with  
other elements of scientific approach to management had driven further the advancement of concept of  
competence specially its application to management (Wilcox, 2012).  
Management Competency and Skill  
The term competence and skill were often used interchangeably specially in its application to management.  
Based from numerous and extensive studies including pioneering authorities and experts, defined competency  
as “an underlying characteristic of an individual that is causally related to criterion-referenced effective and/or  
superior performance in a job or situation” (Spencer & Spencer, 1993) or “the underlying characteristics of a  
person that lead to or cause effective and outstanding performance” (Boyatzis, 1982).  
As abovementioned, the terms competence and skills are often used interchangeably and are close enough also  
to unavoidably generate confusion. Oxford dictionary defined skill as “the ability to do something well; an  
Page 795  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
expertise” and competency defined as “the ability to do something successfully or efficiently“. Interpretably  
concluding, a skill is a specific and specialized ability while competency is the underlying ability to use skill/s  
with additional and combinative analytical, logical, interpretive, etc. abilities toward efficiency, effectiveness  
and success in which it is measurable and comparative.  
Management competency are the possessed collective managerial knowledge and skills applied with enabling  
and reinforcing abilities that is necessary to achieved organizational productivity and success while management  
skills are specific and often individual based often demanded management abilities (Aslan & Pamucku, 2017).  
Theoretical Framework  
In spite of vast literatures worldwide, currently still suggests that no one true or recognized right set of managerial  
competencies which applicable universally to general management. Until now several theories or models related  
to managerial competencies are available. This study postulated from known theories and other universally  
accepted knowledge in management competency. Considerably of these served as the theoretical basis of this  
study, foremost is the notably what was introduced in 1957 by American psychologist Robert W. White, the  
motivational concept of competence emphasizing the biological significance of such behavior in management.  
He further emphasized the learning process of effective interaction with the environs of management. Another  
theory or model corollary followed-up in 1960 by the equally known motivational theorist David Mac Cleland,  
highlighting the inevitable significance of demonstrated competencies in the area of work and the necessity of  
people to perform. Lastly, fundamental theories and models was enhanced further by Richard E. Boyatzis in  
1982 who argued that for performance to be maximized he believed to occur when the person’s capability or  
talent is consistent with the needs of the job demands and the organizational environment specially in  
management.  
This study theoretical framework is mainly grounded to the theory of competence-based strategic management  
by (Sanchez & Heene, 2004). The theory is defined as an integrative strategy that incorporates economic,  
organizational and behavioral concerns in a framework that is dynamic, systemic, cognitive and holistic”. The  
theory defined competence as “the ability to sustain the coordinated deployment of resources in ways that helps  
an organization achieve its goals (creating and distributing value to customers and stakeholders)”. The  
definition encompasses important aspects of the theory of competence-based strategic management,  
emphasizing to explore the dynamic, systemic, cognitive and holistic nature of organizational competences.  
Conceptual Framework  
The study is conceptualized based on competence-based strategic management theory in its behavioral concern  
and cognitive aspects which deals with managers of organization exploring their competency to manage in  
relation to the overall competence of organization to exist and operate. The theory context described above is  
where three main approaches to competency is derived. “The behavioral approach is primarily based on  
outstanding performers. Competence assessed actual behavior, defined in terms of underlying characteristics,  
knowledge skills and motives, and was causally related to superior performance”. The study framework dwell  
in the determining and measuring the possible causal relationships of key variables in the management and  
operation of selected agricultural micro cooperatives in the province of Isabela. The key variables are:  
Independent Variable-Cooperative officers’ core managerial competencies, the officers are foremost in  
managing the cooperative. Cooperative officers composed both elected and appointed (BOD, Committee  
Chairman, Manager & Staff) functioning as both policy making and implementing entity of cooperatives.  
Another Independent Variable is the profile of the agricultural micro cooperatives, profile includes, cooperative  
years of existence or operation, common bond of membership, number of initial cooperators.  
The Dependent Variable-Cooperative Financial Performance, it is the result of the cooperative operation guided  
by the policies and other operational guidelines provided and implemented by the cooperative management. The  
measured level or degree of key variables will be the basis determining their possible cause and effect  
relationship. Based on the findings, a knowledge and conclusion was generated and recommendations suggested  
for possible necessary, appropriate, timely and innovative actions and  
interventions towards capability  
Page 796  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
enhancement and improvement of the current core managerial competencies of cooperative officers specifically  
to the agricultural micro cooperatives.  
Figure 1.1  
COOPERATIVE  
OFFICERS CORE  
MANAGERIAL  
COMPETENCIES  
Establish a cooperative  
and  
perform  
human  
cooperative  
management.  
Develop  
PROFILE OF  
COOPERATIVE  
OFFICERS  
resources system.  
Age  
Sex  
Educational  
Achievement  
Number of year  
as officer  
Ensure  
sound  
cooperatives  
Implement  
safe  
operation  
and  
of  
effective  
financial management.  
Develop  
quality  
products and services.  
Practice  
good  
for  
governance  
cooperatives.  
ACTION PLAN  
FOR  
IMPROVEMENT  
AND  
Contribute to social,  
economic  
and  
environmental  
sustainability.  
INNOVATIONS  
PROFILE OF THE  
COOPERATIVE  
COPERATIVE  
FINANCIAL  
PERFORMANCE  
Years of  
existence  
operation  
or  
Common bond  
of membership  
Number of initial  
Study Conceptual Framework Diagram  
Statement of the Problem  
This proposed study aimed to answer the following questions in the management of selected agricultural micro  
cooperative of the province of Isabela.  
1. What are the demographic profiles of officers of selected agricultural micro cooperative of the province of  
Isabela in terms of the following:  
1.1. age;  
1.2. sex;  
1.3. educational achievement;  
Page 797  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
1.4. number of years as cooperative officer (BOD member, Committee Chairman, Manager & Staff)?.  
2. What is the profile of agricultural micro cooperatives in the province of Isabela in terms of the following:  
2.1. years of existence or operation;  
2.2. common bond of membership;  
2.3. number of initial cooperators?.  
3. What is the level of competency of officers of selected agricultural micro cooperatives in the province of  
Isabela in terms of the following cooperative core managerial competencies :  
3.1. establish a cooperative and perform cooperative management;  
3.2 develop human resources system;  
3.3 ensure safe and sound operation of cooperatives;  
3.4 implement effective financial management;  
3.5 develop quality products and services;  
3.6 practice good governance of cooperatives;  
3.7. contribute to social, economic and environmental sustainability?.  
4. What is the financial performance of selected agricultural micro cooperatives in the province of Isabela in  
terms of the overall rating from Stability, Turn-Over Ratio, Efficiency, Profitability, Structure of Assets  
(STEPS) financial performance measure.  
5. Is there significant relationship between the profile of the cooperative officers and the core managerial  
competencies?  
6. Is there significant relationship between the profile of the cooperatives and financial performance of the  
cooperatives?  
7. Is there significant relationship between the core managerial competencies and financial performance of the  
cooperatives?  
8. What action plan maybe proposed based from the findings of the study.  
Hypotheses  
1. There is no significant relationship between the profile of the cooperative officers and the core managerial  
competencies?  
2. There is no significant relationship between the profile of the cooperatives and financial performance of the  
cooperatives?  
3. There is no significant relationship between the core managerial competencies and financial performance of  
the cooperatives?  
Page 798  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
Operational Definition of Terms  
Agricultural Cooperative “refers to a primary cooperative which or whose  
members are involve/engage  
in raising/culture of plants, animals, fungi, and other living organism for productive and economic purpose and  
in related activities that lead to the reduction of cost and/or value addition of outputs”.  
(CDA-MC No 2015-05).  
Competency - the ability to do something successfully or efficiently.  
Contribute to social, economic and environmental sustainability Cooperative managerial competency focuses  
in advocating the Gender and Development (GAD) and environmental programs,  
institutionalizing Youth Development Program (YDP) and to contribute to the national  
cooperative thrusts.  
Cooperative “refers to an autonomous and duly registered association of persons, with a common bond of  
interest, who have voluntarily joined together to achieve their social, economic, and cultural  
needs and aspirations by making equitable contributions to the capital required, patronizing  
their products and services and accepting a fair share of the risks and benefits of the undertaking  
in accordance with universally accepted cooperative principles”. (CDA-MC No 2015-05).  
Cooperative Manager and Staff The cooperative personnel mainly in-charge for the daily supervision of  
cooperative operation, the General Manager/Manager, Finance Officer/Treasurer, Production. Marketing, etc.  
staffs.  
Cooperative Officers elected and appointed cooperative officers, the members of the Board of Directors  
(BOD), Committee chairmen and members and composition of the manager and staff of  
cooperatives.  
Develop human resources system A core managerial competency required required to be able to develop,  
implement and administer a Human Resource Management Systems (HRM).  
Develop quality products and services - the core managerial competency necessary in creating cooperative  
products and services, formulate and apply marketing strategy. Enhance internal cooperative  
business operations, and implement the Total Quality Management (TQM principles and  
practices.  
Ensure safe and sound operation of cooperatives - a core managerial competency needed for implementing and  
updating a Management Information System (MIS) promoting, implement accounting and  
internal control system, develop business continuity plan, promote sourcing out of capital and  
deposits and manage effectively cooperative assets and liabilities.  
Establish a cooperative and perform cooperative management a core managerial competency required to  
formulate cooperative policies, establish partnership with other cooperatives, perform  
networking and/or linkages with cooperative stakeholders, conduct lobbying and advocacy.  
Implement effective financial management Managerial competency necessary for understanding the basic  
concepts of cooperative financial management. Able to perform budgeting, understand the  
elements cooperative accounting system, analyze and interpret cooperative financial statements.  
Compliance with the mandated cooperative Performance Audit Report (PAR)  
Managerial Competencies exclusively important or necessary knowledge and skills in management and the  
ability perform it efficiently and effectively expectedly to contribute toward cooperatives  
productivity and success  
Page 799  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
Financial Performance - Financial performance is a subjective measure of how a cooperative utilized its assets  
from its operation to generate revenues or increase its assets. Measurement standard in the  
Philippine cooperative is set/mandated by the Cooperative Development Authority (CDA).  
Micro Cooperative A cooperative asset based category in the Philippines, with total asset amounting to three  
million Philippine peso (P3,000,000) and below.  
Practice good governance of cooperatives a cooperative managerial competency for abiding with polices,  
regulations and standards in implementing good governance, directing management strategic  
objectives and observing ethical practices.  
Significance of the Study  
Findings of this study is purposely intended to the following entities specially in providing the needed relevant  
information and knowledge for plans, programs and polices necessary in coping-up and initiating changes and  
innovation to the aspect of cooperative management in the Philippines.  
Academe  
Findings of this proposed study will surely in support and basis in strengthening the implementation of the  
Commission of Higher Education (CHED) Memorandum No. 09 series 2013, the Enhanced Polices and  
Guidelines on Student Affairs and Services, encouraging the establishment of student or laboratory cooperatives.  
Also, Republic Act No. 11364 of 2019, An Act Reorganizing and Strengthening the Cooperative Development  
Authority, under Rule VI, Cooperatives and Educational System of the law Implementing Rules and Regulation  
(IRR) Section 1. Legal Basis, stipulated that “Cooperatives development and administration may be offered as  
a field of study in the baccalaureate, post baccalaureate and masteral programs in State, Universities and  
Colleges (SUCs): Provided, That SUCs may also offer the courses on a non-traditional approach under the  
equivalency program of such SUCs accrediting the equivalent training that an officer has undertaken to the  
relevant subject offering in the curriculum: Provided, further That in cases where the SUCs do not offer a  
separate academic program in cooperative development and administration, the SUCs shall include a three (3)  
unit subject in the curricula of accountancy, agribusiness, agriculture, agricultural economics, business,  
community development, economics, education, environmental sciences, social sciences, political economy and  
other curricula that can be instrumental in the development of cooperatives.” Additionally, Section 2. states that  
“Promotion and integration of cooperatives in the education system. The Authority and the concerned  
stakeholders shall advocate and conduct activities that will promote cooperatives in educational institutions.  
Further, the Authority shall enter into an agreement with the Commission on Higher Education (CHED)."  
Government  
To the Cooperative Developed Authority (CDA) the government regulatory agency for the creation and  
supervision of cooperatives will provide additional and further knowledge from findings of this study as to  
management competencies of specially the officers of agricultural micro cooperatives specifically in the  
province of Isabela. Additionally, with RA 11535 of 2021 which mandates the creation of the position of  
Cooperative Development Officer (CDO) in the municipal, city, and provincial level of local governance.  
Results of this study will contribute information and insights in the formulation and preparation for trainings and  
manpower development as a whole for cooperative officers in the local government units.  
Cooperatives  
The management competencies, specifically officers of cooperatives, will surely be benefited from the findings  
of this study. Additionally, findings and results of this study be utilized as basis and/or reference for enhancing  
and improving the training and other educational intervention and assistance to be provided for cooperative  
officers’ managerial competencies towards an effective and successful management of cooperatives.  
Page 800  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
Cooperative Officers  
Results of this study will contribute significantly to the furtherance and enhancement knowledge, skills and  
competencies of Cooperative Development Officers (CDO) specially in the formulation and development of  
interventions such trainings, assistance and support to their managerial knowhow and/or performance in  
supervising and administration of cooperatives.  
Private Sector and Other Stakeholders for Cooperatives  
Utilizing the information and knowledge as well as the results and recommendations of this be the basis for  
appropriate guidance as to the provision of assistance, support and intervention to be extended to the cooperatives  
in the country.  
Future Researchers and/or Studies  
Currently, locally and worldwide there is still wide and deep avenues to study and investigate as to the  
management of cooperatives specifically in the aspect of managerial and even management competency. This  
study fairly may contribute some relevant and significant theoretical considerations, knowledge and further  
understanding specifically in the aspect of cooperative management. Findings of this study may foster further  
motivation and interest for a continuing investigation and study specially in the management of cooperatives.  
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY  
Research Design  
This dissertation study employed the descriptive-correlational research design. The study initially identified and  
described the subject variables followed by determining its causal relationship or correlation. The study mainly  
measured the core managerial competencies of officers of the subject agricultural micro cooperatives. Based  
from the mandated and adopted rating standard, the financial performance of selected agricultural micro  
cooperatives in the province of Isabela was determined. The study also employed the customarily analysis and  
interpretation of the following statistical tools: frequency and percentage, overall weighted mean, mean and  
standard deviation and Pearson product moment correlation. The independent variable in this study is the core  
managerial competencies of cooperative officers and the dependent variable is the cooperatives financial  
performance (Chungyas & Trinidad, 2022).  
Research Locale and Sampling Procedures  
The study geographical coverage is the whole province of Isabela, which is the second largest province of the  
Philippine in terms of land area. Purposive sampling procedure was employed as the overall subject of the study  
are the compliant agricultural micro cooperatives of the province of Isabela. The list of subject cooperatives  
(Appendix A) was obtained from the Cooperative Development Authority (CDA) Region 02 (Cagayan Valley)  
Extension Office. Purposive sampling was employed using the criteria of selecting all the 37 compliant  
agricultural micro cooperatives in year 2023 in the province of Isabela.  
Scope and Delimitation  
Geographical scope of the study is the whole province of Isabela, the province is composed of 34 municipalities,  
2 component cities and 1 independent city. The overall subject of the study are compliant agricultural micro  
cooperatives as it comprises majority of micro cooperatives in the province. Subject individual respondents of  
the study are the officers of the cooperatives, cooperative officers are both elected and appointed, the officers  
are the main managing body of the cooperatives, the members of the Board of Directors, Committees Chairman  
and the Manager and Staff which directly lead and supervise the overall management and daily operation of the  
cooperative. As to the scope of the variables of the study, it focused in the measurement of the level of core  
competencies of the cooperative officers, the mode in measuring the competencies is self-rated. Another variable  
is the financial performance of the cooperatives, which is an annual or yearly Performance Audit Report (PAR)  
Page 801  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
as required by the Cooperative Development Authority (CDA) with mandated/prescribed rating standard for  
financial performance evaluation and reporting for cooperatives.  
The subject cooperative respondents was purposely selected with classification status as active or compliant  
cooperative and only those registered from the past five (5) years 2018 to 2022. For the subject individual  
respondents, the cooperatives officers are those only who are duly or legally elected and appointed officers and  
the employed or recognized cooperative management staffs or team.  
Research Instrument  
A developed or crafted study questionnaire was used in the study (Appendix B) specially in determining the core  
managerial competencies of cooperative officers. The data for level of core managerial competencies are the  
primary data. In developing the questionnaire cooperative experts were consulted, current government policies,  
processes/procedures in training and training materials for cooperative management competencies were utilized.  
The questioner was pre-tested as part of its validation employing the principles and adopted standards in pre-  
testing such as actual pilot-testing in filling-up of the study questionnaire, respondent debriefing and expert  
evaluation. The questionnaire is composed of three parts, first part is composed of obtaining the demographic  
profile of the cooperative officers as the study individual respondents, the second part is the profile of the  
cooperative and the last part is the core cooperative managerial competencies in which the respondents self-rate  
their respective core managerial competencies. The rating scale for the managerial competencies of cooperative  
officers was based and patterned from the Likert Rating Scale with adjectival description of ratings as: 1 - No  
knowledge and unable to perform (NK); 2 - Minimal knowledge and ability to perform (MK); 3 - Partial  
knowledge and ability to perform (PK); 3 - Partial knowledge and ability to perform (PK); 4 - Enough knowledge  
and ability to perform (EK) and 5 - Completely knowledgeable and very able to perform (CK). The cooperative  
financial performance, a secondary data was requested from the Cooperative Development Authority (CDA) a  
mandated report submitted annually by the cooperatives, the Performance Audit Report (PAR) of cooperatives.  
The Financial Performance Report of the PAR was rated and evaluated thru a corresponding formulated  
equivalent rating scale and evaluation result description (Appendix B).  
Data Gathering Procedures  
The data gathering was conducted for 8 months, January-August 2024. Prior information or request was  
communicated specially to the subject individual respondents of the study as to the purpose of obtaining their  
primary personal data and information from them. The main subject cooperative respondents were the selected  
agricultural micro cooperatives in the province was chosen thru purposive sampling from the list of cooperatives  
requested from and provided by the Cooperative Development Authority (CDA) Regional Extension Office 02  
(Cagayan Valley), the respondent cooperative officers were from the selected cooperatives. The study  
questionnaire for the respondent cooperative officers was administered in person. The needed secondary data  
which are the cooperatives municipal addresses, year registered, category, type, status and asset size and  
cooperative financial performance were requested from the Cooperative Development Authority (CDA)  
Regional Extension Office 02 (Cagayan Valley).  
Data Management and Analysis  
The primary derived data and/or information from the respondents was encoded and analyzed with the  
applicable computer statistical software applications. It was analyzed following the commonly adopted standard  
and principles in analysis and interpretation with the use of the following statistical tools; for study problem  
number 1 and 2 frequency and percentage was used. The mean, weighted mean and standard deviation was used  
for problem number 3. Lastly, for problems 4,5 and 6, the Pearson product moment correlation was used.  
Ethical Considerations in the Conduct of the Research Study, the Treatment of the Study  
Respondents/Participants, Data and Information.  
The study was conducted following the generally accepted ethical considerations and principles below, specially  
the provisions of Data Privacy Act of 2022 and its Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR).  
Page 802  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
Properly inform and obtain voluntary consent from the subject individual respondents. Additionally assuring  
them that they understand the purpose of the study and the necessity of obtaining personal data and information  
from them.  
In compliance with the existing laws, rules and regulation appropriate confidentiality and anonymity of the  
respondents was observed and maintained throughout the research process up to the final output.  
The study adhered to ethical guidelines and regulations set forth by the Wesleyan University-Philippines, the  
researcher’s Higher Education Institution (HEI) employer and other government and legal entities governing the  
conduct of research studies.  
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION  
This chapter provides the presentation of statistical data relative to the problems posted in Chapter I. Analysis  
and interpretation regarding these presented data were likewise incorporated in this portion of this study.  
Demographic Profile of Officers in Selected Agricultural Micro Cooperative  
The data gathered on the demographic profile of officers in selected agricultural micro cooperative included sex,  
age, educational attainment and number of years as cooperative officers.  
Table 3.1  
Demographic Profile of Officers in Selected Agricultural Micro Cooperative  
Sex  
Frequency  
Percentage  
51.89  
Male  
96  
Female  
89  
48.11  
Total  
185  
100.00  
Percentage  
3.24  
Age  
Frequency  
18-25  
6
26-33  
27  
14.59  
34 - 42  
38  
20.54  
43 - 50  
38  
20.54  
56 - above  
Total  
76  
41.08  
185  
100.00  
Percentage  
3.24  
Educational Attainment  
Elementary  
Secondary  
College graduate  
Post College/Graduate  
Frequency  
6
45  
118  
16  
24.32  
63.78  
8.65  
Page 803  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
Total  
185  
100.00  
Number of years as cooperative Frequency  
Officer  
Percentage  
less than 1 year  
1 - 3 years  
4 - 6 years  
7 - above  
2
1.08  
108  
70  
5
58.38  
37.84  
2.70  
Total  
185  
100.00  
1.1 Sex  
Out of 185 respondents, 96 or 51.89 percent were male and 89 or 48.11 percent were female. It is evident that  
the officers of selected agricultural micro cooperative within the locality of the study were dominated by male.  
Cooperatives can be male-dominated due to cultural norms, male are suitable for leadership roles because of  
their argentic characteristics as aggressive, ambitious, dominant, forceful, independent, self-sufficient, self-  
confident, and prone to act as a leader. The perception of dominant male leaders as the norm helps male leaders  
to be perceived as leaders (Kim et al., 2020).  
1.2 Age  
In terms of age, there were 76 or 41.08 percent were belonged within the age range of 56 above, followed by  
38 or 20.54 percent were belonged within the age bracket of 34 42 and 43 50 years old respectively, and 27  
or 14.59 percent belonged within the age range of 26 33 years old. Meanwhile, 6 or 3.24 percent recorded that  
they were belonged within the age bracket of 18 25 years old. This result indicates that most of the respondents  
belonged within the age bracket of 56 above years old. This age bracket belongs to middle adulthood according  
to Erik Erikson's eight Stages of Psychosocial Development as reviewed by Cherry (2024). In this stage, they  
strive to create or nurture things that will outlast them, often by fostering positive changes that benefit others.  
Contributing to society and doing things to promote future generations are important needs at the stage of  
development (Rubinstein et al., 2015).  
1.3 Educational Attainment  
As to educational attainment, 118 or 63.78 percent were college graduate, followed by 45 or 24.32 percent  
secondary graduate and 16 or 8.65 percent were post college/graduate. Similarly, 6 or 3.24 percent recorded that  
they were elementary graduate. This result indicates that most of the officers in selected agricultural micro  
cooperative were college graduate. Having a majority of college graduates among officers of the cooperative  
can bring numerous benefits such as enhanced decision-making and leadership skills, stronger financial  
management and planning, improved communication and interpersonal skills and increased professionalism and  
credibility. This result confirmed with the result of the study of Onate (2015).  
1.4 Number of years as cooperative Officer  
Finally, in terms of number of years as cooperative officers, 108 or 58.38 percent recorded that they were  
cooperative officers for a period of 1 3 years, followed by 70 or 37. 84 percent 4 -6 years and 5 or 2.70 percent  
were cooperative officers for more than 7 years. Relatively, 2 or 1.08 percent recorded that they serve the  
cooperative for about less than 1 year. This result implies that most of the respondents was cooperative officers  
for a period of 1 3 years. This implies that the cooperative officers have a short period of time to get familiarized  
with the by laws and policies and limited understanding of cooperative operations. In like manner, even though  
they are new, they have fresh perspective and ideas, new skills and expertise and has diverse experiences and  
Page 804  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
backgrounds. A study by the National Cooperative Business Association (NCBA) found that 71% of new  
cooperative members remain active after one year, and 55% after three years (NCBA, 2020).  
Profile of Agricultural Micro Cooperatives  
The data gathered on the profile of the agricultural micro cooperatives include years of cooperative existence,  
common bond membership and number of initial cooperators.  
Table 3.2  
Profile of Agricultural Micro Cooperatives  
Years of Coop Existence  
Frequency  
Percentage  
40.54  
1 - 3 years  
15  
4 - 6 years  
22  
59.46  
Total  
37  
100.00  
Percentage  
86.49  
Common Bond of Membership  
Frequency  
Residential  
Occupational  
Associational  
Institutional  
Total  
32  
3
8.11  
2
5.41  
0
0.00  
37  
100.00  
Percentage  
51.35  
Number of Initial Cooperators  
15 - 24  
Frequency  
19  
13  
3
25 - 34  
35.14  
35 - 44  
8.11  
45 - 54  
2
5.41  
55 - above  
Total  
0
0.00  
37  
100.00  
Years of Cooperative Existence  
Data show that out of 37 agricultural micro cooperatives, 22 or 59.46 percent existed for a period of 4 6 years  
and 15 or 40.54 percent existed for a period of one to three years. The result indicates that most of the agricultural  
micro cooperatives were existed for a period of 4 6 years. Results further denote that cooperatives with 4 -6  
years of existence often experience significant growth, consolidation and maturation. A National Cooperative  
Business Association (NCBA) survey found that 55% of cooperatives with 4-6 years of tenure report increased  
membership, and 45% report increased revenue (NCBA, 2020).  
Page 805  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
Common Bond of Membership  
In terms of common bond of membership, 32 or 86.49 percent had a residential common bond of membership,  
followed by 3 or 8.11 percent occupational and 2 or 5.41 percent recorded that they had associational common  
bond of membership. It can be inferred from the data that most of the cooperatives had a common residential  
bond of membership which means that they are living in a neighborhood and are engage in social connections  
and foster mutual support and cooperation among them. A study by the University of Wisconsin-Madison found  
that 75% of housing cooperative members reported feeling a sense of community and connection with their  
neighbors (UW-Madison, 2018).  
Number of Initial Cooperators  
Finally, in terms of initial cooperators, 19 or 51.35 percent had a number of cooperators from 15 24, followed  
by 13 or 35.14 percent 25 34, and 3 or 8.11 percent has a number of initial cooperators of 35 44. Meanwhile,  
2 or 5.41 percent recorded that they had a number of initial cooperators of 44 -54. This result indicates that most  
of the agricultural micro cooperatives had an initial cooperator of 15 24. Results further denote that this number  
of cooperators confirmed that the cooperative was classified under micro-cooperative. One of the benefits of this  
cooperative are enhanced social capital and community engagement and increased innovation and adaptability  
(International Cooperative Alliance, 2020).  
Managerial Competencies of Officers of Selected Agricultural Micro Cooperatives  
The data gathered on the core managerial competencies of officers of selected agricultural micro cooperatives  
which includes eestablish a cooperative and perform cooperative management, develop human resources system,  
ensure safe and sound operation of cooperatives, implement effective financial management, develop quality  
products and services, practice good governance of cooperatives and contribute to social, economic and  
environmental sustainability.  
Establish a Cooperative and Perform Cooperative Management  
Table 3.3  
Core Managerial Competencies of Officers of Selected Agricultural Micro Cooperatives in terms of Establish a  
Cooperative and Perform Cooperative Management  
1. Establish A Cooperative and Perform Cooperative Mean  
Management.  
SD  
Adjectival  
Description  
1.1 Able to judiciously implement and enforce cooperative 3.52  
fundamental governing laws (RA 9520, 11364, etc.) rules  
and regulations (CDA MCs) of cooperatives.  
1.11  
EK  
1.2 Able to formulate relevant and effective cooperative, 3.55  
vision, mission, goals, objectives (VMGO), plans, programs  
and policies.  
1.02  
EK  
1.3 Able to establish networking and linkages with 3.43  
government entities and other cooperative stakeholders.  
1.14  
1.03  
0.99  
EK  
PK  
EK  
1.4 Able to establish and strengthen partnership with 3.38  
other cooperatives.  
1.5 Able to provide support in the conduct of research and 3.44  
evaluation of cooperative operation.  
Page 806  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
1.6 Able to nourish a cooperative identity.  
3.63  
0.99  
0.93  
0.94  
EK  
EK  
EK  
1.7 Able to foster cooperative culture.  
3.59  
1.8 Able to develop effective cooperative communication 3.59  
plan.  
1.9 Able to formulate and implement a cooperative 3.58  
business continuity plan.  
0.92  
EK  
Overall Weighted Mean  
3.52  
0.90  
EK  
Legend:  
4.20 - 5.00 Completely knowledgeable and very able to perform (CK)  
3.40 - 4.19 Enough knowledge and ability to perform (EK)  
2.60 - 3.39 Partial knowledge and ability to perform (PK)  
1.80 - 2.59 Minimal knowledge and ability to perform (MK)  
1.00 - 1.79 No knowledge and unable to perform (NK)  
The respondent’s assessment on the core managerial competencies of officers of selected agricultural micro  
cooperatives in terms of establish a cooperative and perform cooperative management obtained an overall  
weighted mean of 3.52 (SD=0.90) which was verbally described as “Enough knowledge and ability to perform.”  
The item got the highest mean was “Able to nourish a cooperative identity,” with a mean of 3.63 (SD=0.99)  
translated as “Enough knowledge and ability to perform, while the item got the lowest mean was “Able to  
establish and strengthen partnership with other cooperatives,” with a mean of 3.38 (SD=1.03) which was verbally  
described as “Partial knowledge and ability to perform.” The calculated standard deviation of overall weighted  
mean and item got the highest mean was homogenous and the item got the lowest mean was a little bit fluctuate  
based on the responses of the respondents.  
This result indicates that the respondents able to manage the cooperative because of their broad skills including  
financial knowledge, people skills and the ability to plan, organize, staff, direct and control. Hey were able to  
make a sound strategic plan with able manager that suggests strategies and analyze alternatives. Similarly, they  
were able to nurture the cooperative identity through their cooperative values based on the value of self-  
help, self-responsibility, democracy, equality, equity, and solidarity. In addition, they were able to promote  
ethical values of honesty, openness, social responsibility and caring for others. In the same vein, the respondents  
perceived that they need to improve and enhance their collaboration and partnership with other cooperatives to  
carry out in the form of capitalization, coaching, and assistance in improving cooperative efforts.  
Iceberg Competency Model by Hay McBer explains that there are three main components of competency,  
namely knowledge, skills, and attitude (personality). Knowledge competency means an individual’s ability to  
continuously improve their knowledge to effectively improve their individual performance. Meanwhile, skills  
competency is an individual’s ability to utilize and take advantage of their knowledge and skills to successfully  
perform a task. Next, attitude competency is the personal values and traits that are embodied and practiced by a  
working individual (Abdullah, 2017).  
Develop Human Resource System  
Table 3.4  
Core Managerial Competencies of Officers of Selected Agricultural Micro Cooperatives in terms of Develop  
Human Resource System  
Page 807  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
2. Develop Human Resources System  
Mean  
SD  
Adjectival  
Description  
2.1 Able to develop Human Resources Management 3.50  
(HRM) systems and processes for cooperatives.  
0.96  
0.93  
0.96  
EK  
EK  
EK  
2.2 Able to apply, administer, and manage HRM 3.45  
systems and processes.  
2.3 Able to develop and implement human resource 3.50  
capacitation (entrepreneurial skills, competencies  
and activities) plan for cooperatives.  
2.4 Able to improve a HRM systems and processes 3.54  
of cooperative.  
0.89  
EK  
Overall Weighted Mean  
3.50  
0.88  
EK  
Legend:  
4.20 - 5.00 Completely knowledgeable and very able to perform (CK)  
3.40 - 4.19 Enough knowledge and ability to perform (EK)  
2.60 - 3.39 Partial knowledge and ability to perform (PK)  
1.80 - 2.59 Minimal knowledge and ability to perform (MK)  
1.00 - 1.79 No knowledge and unable to perform (NK)  
The respondents assessment on the core managerial competencies of officers of selected agricultural micro  
cooperatives in terms of develop human resource system obtained an overall weighted mean of 3.50 (SD=0.88)  
which was verbally described as “Enough knowledge and ability to perform.” In this indicator, the item got the  
highest mean was “Able to improve a HRM systems and processes of cooperative,” with a mean of 3.54  
(SD=0.88) translated as “Enough knowledge and ability to perform,” while the item got the lowest mean was  
“Able to apply, administer, and manage HRM systems and processes,” with a mean of 3.45 (SD=0.93) which  
was verbally described as “Enough knowledge and ability to perform.” The calculated standard deviation was  
homogenous based on the responses of the respondents.  
This result implies that the cooperative officers able to exercise human resource system that are aligned to the  
cooperative development and management. They were able to have an strategic thinking that align their initiative  
to their cooperative goals that yielded a competitive advantage. Effective communication skills that develop  
open communications and mutual understanding among officers and members. In like manner, they were able  
to upgrade themselves by attending capacity building and cooperative trends that enhance their ability to improve  
their human resource needs. The cooperative officers able to translate a workplace culture that the develop health  
workplace, motive employees and able to create a positive working environment. Drawing on interviews with  
human resources managers in social cooperatives, Cisi and Centrone (2021) elaborate that these organizations  
prioritize the ethical dimension of work, valuing individuals based on their alignment with the organization’s  
mission and values rather than solely their skills and performance. As transformative entities, cooperatives adopt  
novel management patterns, and foster social and labor relationships (Rincon-Roldan & Lopez-Cabrales, 2022).  
Page 808  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
Ensure Safety and Sound Operation of Cooperatives  
Table 3.5  
Core Managerial Competencies of Officers of Selected Agricultural Micro  
Cooperatives in terms of Ensure Safety and Sound Operation of Cooperatives  
3. Ensure Safe and Sound Operation for Mean  
Cooperatives  
SD  
Adjectival  
Description  
3.1 Able to satisfy the roles, perform the duties, 3.72  
0.99  
EK  
responsibilities,  
accept  
accountabilities  
and  
integrate good Filipino values in leading the  
cooperative.  
3.2 Able to apply parliamentary procedures in 3.63  
conducting meeting.  
0.96  
1.05  
1.00  
EK  
EK  
EK  
3.3 Able to develop a mediation and conciliation 3.47  
program.  
3.4 Able to formulate approaches in implementing 3.56  
the mediation and conciliation program.  
3.5 Able to establish records management.  
3.49  
1.09  
1.10  
EK  
PK  
3.6 Able to integrate/implement necessary 3.27  
technologies (computerization, digitization. etc.) to  
the cooperative operation.  
3.7 Able to establish an updated Management 3.22  
Information System (MIS) and data analytics.  
1.05  
1.03  
PK  
EK  
3.8 Able to comply with statutory and other 3.43  
documentary reportorial requirements of CDA &  
BIR.  
Overall Weighted Mean  
3.47  
0.92  
EK  
Legend:  
4.20 - 5.00 Completely knowledgeable and very able to perform (CK)  
3.40 - 4.19 Enough knowledge and ability to perform (EK)  
2.60 - 3.39 Partial knowledge and ability to perform (PK)  
1.80 - 2.59 Minimal knowledge and ability to perform (MK)  
1.00 - 1.79 No knowledge and unable to perform (NK)  
The respondents assessment on the core managerial competencies of officers of selected agricultural micro  
cooperatives in terms of ensure safety and sound operation of cooperatives obtained an overall weighted mean  
of 3.47 (SD=0.92) which was verbally described as “Enough knowledge and ability to perform.” In this indicator,  
the item got the highest mean was Able to satisfy the roles, perform the duties, responsibilities, accept  
Page 809  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
accountabilities and integrate good Filipino values in leading the cooperative,” with a mean of 3.72 (SD=0.99)  
translated as “Enough knowledge and ability to perform,” while the item got the lowest mean was “Able to  
establish an updated Management Information System (MIS) and data analytics,” with a mean of 3.22 (SD=1.05)  
which was verbally described as “Partial knowledge and ability to perform.” The calculated standard deviation  
on the overall weighted mean and the item got the highest mean was homogenous and a little bit fluctuated on  
the item got the lowest mean.  
This result indicates that the respondents able to ensure safe and sound operation by following regulations of the  
CDA that enforces cooperative laws, rules and regular review of the regulatory standards to maintain  
satisfactorily performance. Similarly, they regularly monitor the cooperative performance through regular  
reporting and review of feedbacks from its members. They see to it that they regularly submit reports and ensure  
compliance to the CDA cooperative requirements. Also, they ensure safe and sound operations by implementing  
policies, systems and procedures in a timely manner.  
In Republic Act 9520 of the CDA they assure that every cooperative in the Philippines shall conduct its affairs  
in accordance with Filipino culture, good values and experience and the universally accepted principles of  
cooperation which include, but are not limited to, the voluntary and open membership, democratic member  
control, cooperation among cooperatives and concern for the community. Meanwhile, the cooperative officers  
try to establish MIS and data analytics that can be useful in the operation of the cooperative, by allowing  
themselves to train themselves in the latest innovation in handing records and analyzing data that can be used in  
decision making. Coursera (2024) postulated that MIS is a system that provides managers with the necessary  
information to make decisions about an organization's operations. The MIS gathers data from various sources  
and processes it to provide information tailored to the managers' and their staff's needs.  
Implement Effective Financial Management  
Table 3.6  
Core Managerial Competencies of Officers of Selected Agricultural Micro Cooperatives in terms of Implement  
Effective Financial Management  
4. Implement Effective Financial Management.  
Mean  
SD  
Adjectival  
Description  
4.1 Able to perform basic cooperative budgeting.  
4.2 Able to generate capital and deposits.  
3.36  
3.39  
1.08  
1.09  
1.00  
PK  
PK  
PK  
4.3 Able to establish and supervise an accounting, 3.28  
auditing and internal control system for  
cooperatives.  
4.4 Able to develop and implement effective credit 3.44  
collection strategies.  
0.94  
1.09  
1.08  
EK  
EK  
PK  
4.5 Able to manage effectively the cooperative 3.43  
assets and liabilities.  
4.6 Able to comply with standard cooperative 3.24  
Performance Audit Report (PAR)-Governance &  
Management Report and Financial Performance  
Report (Stability, Turn-Over Ratio, Efficiency,  
Profitability, Structure of Assets (STEPS).  
Page 810  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
4.7 Able to identify investment opportunities for 3.37  
cooperatives.  
1.00  
PK  
Overall Weighted Mean  
3.36  
0.97  
PK  
Legend:  
4.20 - 5.00 Completely knowledgeable and very able to perform (CK)  
3.40 - 4.19 Enough knowledge and ability to perform (EK)  
2.60 - 3.39 Partial knowledge and ability to perform (PK)  
1.80 - 2.59 Minimal knowledge and ability to perform (MK)  
1.00 - 1.79 No knowledge and unable to perform (NK)  
The respondent’s assessment on the core managerial competencies of officers of selected agricultural micro  
cooperatives in terms of implement effective financial management obtained an overall weighted mean of 3.36  
(SD=0.97) which was verbally described as “Partial knowledge and ability to perform.” The item got the highest  
mean was “Able to develop and implement effective credit collection strategies,” with a mean of 3.44 (SD=0.94)  
translated as “Enough knowledge and ability to perform,” while the item got the lowest mean was “Able to  
comply with standard cooperative Performance Audit Report (PAR)-Governance & Management Report and  
Financial Performance Report (Stability, Turn-Over Ratio, Efficiency, Profitability, Structure of Assets  
(STEPS),” with a mean of 3.24 (SD=1.08) which was verbally described as “Partial knowledge and ability to  
perform. The calculated standard deviation on the overall weighted mean and the item got the highest mean was  
homogenous and a little bit fluctuated on the item got the lowest mean.  
This result indicates that the overall assessment of the cooperative officers in this aspect of their operations was  
limited based on their experiences in handling financial controlling and management. They need to improve their  
financial management capabilities by involving themselves in the planning, organizing, controlling and  
monitoring of their financial resources to meet business objectives. On the other hand, they were able to improve  
credit collection strategies through consistent communication to those members with loans and always offer  
payment options to facilitate their payments. In the same vein, they try to comply with the standards of  
cooperative, and systematic reporting of finances for audit and analysis of the financial performance. The  
financial management of cooperatives must be fair, transparent, and accountable. Organizations are microfinance  
institutions. Microfinance institutions face a low risk of liquidity. Microfinance institutions have the potential to  
maintain liquidity. Microfinance institutions can operate activities in paying off obligations in the short term  
(Gietzen, 2017). Collaborative management must be professional to improve performance. Proper organizational  
management can give trust to the owner about the return on investment invested. In the cooperative, the owner  
is a member of the collective. Returns on investment in the form of organizations in the way of remaining  
business results investment in cooperative members in the form of maximum savings, mandatory savings,  
and voluntary savings (Peña-Miguel et al., 2017).  
Develop Quality Products and Services  
Table 3.7 Core Managerial Competencies of Officers of Selected Agricultural Micro Cooperatives in terms of  
Develop Quality Products and Services  
5. Develop Quality Products and Services  
Mean  
SD  
Adjectival  
Description  
5.1 Able to initiate, create and innovate products and services for 3.43  
cooperatives.  
1.00  
EK  
Page 811  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
5.2 Able to develop a cooperative marketing program.  
3.46  
0.91  
EK  
5.3 Able to implement a cooperative marketing program and 3.41  
strategies.  
1.00  
EK  
5.4 Able to improve internal cooperative business processes.  
3.38  
0.96  
1.01  
PK  
PK  
5.5 Able to adopt and adapt Total Quality Management (TQM) 3.37  
principles and practices for cooperatives.  
Overall Weighted Mean  
3.41  
0.91  
EK  
Legend:  
4.20 - 5.00 Completely knowledgeable and very able to perform (CK)  
3.40 - 4.19 Enough knowledge and ability to perform (EK)  
2.60 - 3.39 Partial knowledge and ability to perform (PK)  
1.80 - 2.59 Minimal knowledge and ability to perform (MK)  
1.00 - 1.79 No knowledge and unable to perform (NK)  
The respondent’s assessment on the core managerial competencies of officers of selected agricultural micro  
cooperatives in terms of develop quality products and services obtained an overall weighted mean of 3.41  
(SD=0.91) which was verbally described as “Enough knowledge and ability to perform.” In this indicator the  
item got the highest mean was “Able to develop a cooperative marketing program,” with a mean of 3.46  
(SD=0.91) translated as “Enough knowledge and ability to perform,” while the item got the lowest mean was  
“Able to improve internal cooperative business processes,” with a mean of 3.38 (SD=0.96) which was verbally  
described as “Partial knowledge and ability to perform.” The calculated standard deviation was homogenous  
based on the responses of the respondents. This result implies that the respondents had an enough knowledge  
and ability to perform in developing products and services. They were able to define quality standards,  
implement quality assurance and perform quality control to meet cooperative member’s needs.  
In like manner, the officers train themselves to deliver quality products and services and for continuous  
improvement within the cooperative. They systematically document quality control activities and results to  
detect or deviates for the standards.  
Quality is important for a company's long-term growth and  
profitability. Recalls and other quality issues can result in significant financial losses and damage to brand's  
reputation. Improving product quality is integral to company success. Quality management has become a reality  
that businesses can no longer ignore or take lightly, as they need it for their long-term growth and profitability  
both now and in the future. This means embedding these practices into routine processes so everyday operations  
are based on high-quality workmanship instead of an afterthought (Philip, 2022).  
Practice Good Governance of Cooperatives  
Table 3.8 Core Managerial Competencies of Officers of Selected Agricultural Micro Cooperatives in terms of  
Practice Good Governance of Cooperatives  
6. Practice Good Governance for Cooperatives  
Mean  
SD  
Adjectival  
Description  
6.1 Able to promote good governance, implement 3.49  
labor and other related laws.  
1.01  
EK  
Page 812  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
6.2 Able to promote cooperative ethical practices.  
3.61  
1.02  
EK  
6.3 Able to apply principles of management in 3.63  
cooperative.  
1.01  
EK  
6.4 Able to develop cooperative strategic plan.  
6.5 Able to direct a cooperative strategic thrust.  
Overall Weighted Mean  
3.46  
3.49  
3.54  
0.98  
1.00  
0.95  
EK  
EK  
EK  
Legend:  
4.20 - 5.00 Completely knowledgeable and very able to perform (CK)  
3.40 - 4.19 Enough knowledge and ability to perform (EK)  
2.60 - 3.39 Partial knowledge and ability to perform (PK)  
1.80 - 2.59 Minimal knowledge and ability to perform (MK)  
1.00 - 1.79 No knowledge and unable to perform (NK)  
The respondent’s assessment on the core managerial competencies of officers of selected agricultural micro  
cooperatives in terms of practice good governance of cooperatives yielded an overall weighed mean of 3.54  
(SD=0.95) which was verbally described as “Enough knowledge and ability to perform. “In this indicator the  
item got the highest mean was “Able to apply principles of management in cooperative,” with a mean of 3.63  
(SD=1.01) translated as “Enough knowledge and ability to perform,” while the item got the lowest mean was  
“Able to develop cooperative strategic plan,” with a mean of 3.46 (SD=0.98) which was verbally described as  
“Enough knowledge and ability to perform.” The calculated standard deviation on the overall weighed mean and  
item with the lowest mean homogenous, while the standard deviation for the item got the lowest mean was a  
little bit fluctuate based on the responses of the respondents.  
This result indicates that the officers of the cooperative attests that they practice good governance by establishing  
and understand their roles within the organization. They create shaves vision and work with the stakeholders to  
develop shared understanding on the cooperative goals. They build legitimacy to ensure decisions are recognized  
as having authority by the majority of the stakeholders. Similarly, they exercise transparency to provide members  
with relevant information so they make informed decisions. They likewise encourage member’s participation in  
the annual general meeting. Lastly, they show flexibility to adapt the governance system in to evolving situations.  
Integrating a good governance strategy is a competitive necessity for cooperatives.  
Cooperative governance answers key business questions, defines roles and responsibilities, establishes processes  
for setting expectations and ensures accountability and steers community-owned business enterprises towards  
socio-economic and cultural success. Good cooperative governance enables sustainable business growth and  
long-term competitive advantage, awards opportunities to manage risks and adds value for efective monitoring  
of business activities. Innovation and fexibility facilitate changed circumstances towards registering competitive  
advantage (Bishwas, 2015)  
Contribute to Social, Economic and Environmental Sustainability  
Table 3.9  
Core Managerial Competencies of Officers of Selected Agricultural Micro Cooperatives in terms of Contribute  
to Social, Economic and Environmental Sustainability  
Page 813  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
7.  
Contribute  
to  
Social,  
Economic  
and Mean  
SD  
Adjectival  
Description  
Environmental Sustainability  
7.1 Able to advocate, develop and implement 3.47  
Gender and Development (GAD) program.  
0.93  
1.00  
1.07  
1.06  
0.99  
EK  
EK  
EK  
EK  
EK  
7.2 Able to institutionalize a Youth Development 3.40  
Program (YDP) in the cooperative.  
7.3 Able to advocate an environmental program for 3.56  
cooperative.  
7.4  
Able to initiate contribution to national  
3.52  
cooperative plans and goals.  
7.5  
programs  
Able to initiate cooperative projects and  
that contributes to the social  
3.57  
development of the community.  
Overall Weighted Mean  
Legend:  
3.50  
0.95  
EK  
4.20 - 5.00 Completely knowledgeable and very able to perform (CK)  
3.40 - 4.19 Enough knowledge and ability to perform (EK)  
2.60 - 3.39 Partial knowledge and ability to perform (PK)  
1.80 - 2.59 Minimal knowledge and ability to perform (MK)  
1.00 - 1.79 No knowledge and unable to perform (NK)  
The respondent’s assessment on the core managerial competencies of officers of selected agricultural micro  
cooperatives in terms of contribute to social, economic and environmental sustainability yielded an overall  
weighed mean of 3.50 (SD=0.95) which was verbally described as “Enough knowledge and ability to perform.”  
In this indicator, the item got the highest mean was “Able to initiate cooperative projects and programs that  
contributes to the social development of the community,” with a mean of 3.57 (SD=0.99) translated as “Enough  
knowledge and ability to perform,” while the item got the lowest mean was “Able to institutionalize a Youth  
Development Program (YDP) in the cooperative,” with a mean of 3.40 (SD=1.00) which was verbally described  
as “Enough knowledge and ability to perform.” The calculated standard deviation on the overall weighed mean  
and item got the highest mean was homogenous and the standard deviation for the item got the lowest mean was  
fluctuate based on the responses of the respondents.  
This result implies that the respondents able to put into action individual actions that can contribute to social,  
economic and environmental sustainability by teaching members to participate in the sustainable activities like  
waste management, conservation and sustainable agriculture. Likewise, they engage in decision-making process  
to ensure development plans align with community priorities. Cooperative also contribute to economic  
sustainability by creating jobs that contribute to the local economic growth and stimulate economic activity. The  
respondents also assure the cooperative promote social inclusion and promote workers and members well-being.  
Lastly, they also ensure that the cooperative emphasizes environmental sustainability and community  
development and play a vital role in addressing climate change and the US Sustainable Development Goal (SDG  
# 13: Climate Action. On the other hand, the cooperative needs to prioritize also youth development program as  
a collaborative program to enhance youth partnership to various community engagements. Cooperatives are  
highly relevant and important in the realization of the proposed sustainable development goals. This brief  
highlights the actual contribution of cooperatives to the twelve SDGs proposed by the High-Level Panel of  
Page 814  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
Eminent Persons in the Post2015 Development Agenda in their report of 2013. Though the specific goals, targets  
and indicators will not be agreed upon until September 2015 as part of the ongoing process, these twelve  
proposed goals reflect the range of themes that will likely be covered by the SDGs (ILO, 2024). Constantly,  
cooperatives in Ifugao, Philippines are contributory to economic, environmental and social welfare by  
diminishing poverty, creating employment, improving food security, empowering societies, creating rural  
markets and developing human capital (Pagaddut, 2023).  
Financial Performance of Selected Agricultural Micro Cooperatives  
Table 3.10  
Financial Performance of Selected Agricultural Micro Cooperatives  
Performance of the Cooperative  
78 - 100 (Excellent)  
58 - 77 (Very Satisfactory)  
38 - 57 (Satisfactory)  
20 - 37 (Fair)  
Frequency  
Percentage  
0.00  
0
0
0.00  
2
5.41  
35  
0
94.59  
0.00  
1 - 19 (Needs Improvement)  
Total  
37  
100.00  
Mean Performance of the Cooperative: 29.51 (Fair)  
Table 3.10 presents the financial performance of selected agricultural micro cooperatives. Out of 35 respondents,  
37 or 94.59 percent obtained a “fair” financial performance and 2 or 5.41 percent has a “very satisfactory”  
financial performance. This result indicates that most of the selected agricultural micro cooperatives had a fair  
financial performance. This result implies that the officers of the cooperatives need to improve their financial  
capabilities and cooperative financial stand. They need to follow the Philippine Financial Reporting Framework  
for Cooperatives that includes, financial statements, comparative financial statements and consistent presentation  
and classification of reports for the next period. They need to analyze financial statement to determine financial  
health in the areas of their strength and weaknesses.  
Similarly, to monitor their financial performance, the cooperative may undergo a regular performance audit to  
determine the organizational economic and social aspects. Numerous evaluations of cooperative performance  
have focused mainly on the financial aspect of business operations. Pokharel et al. (2018) analyzed the effect of  
size and specialization on agricultural cooperatives in the United States, whereas Shamsuddin et al. (2018)  
uncovered financial ratios and non-financial indicators that contribute to cooperative financial performance.  
Masuku et al. (2016) evaluated multipurpose cooperatives in the Shiselweni Region, whereas Simkhada (2017)  
examined financial cooperative indicators in Nepal. Nevertheless, the majority of studies primarily focus on  
financial aspects, ignoring nonfinancial components of cooperative operations.  
Correlation Analysis between the Profile of Cooperative Officers and Managerial Competencies  
Table 3.11 Correlation Analysis between the Profile of Cooperative Officers and Managerial Competencies  
Variable  
Correlation  
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
Pearson  
Sex  
Correlation  
0.007  
-0.042  
0.026  
0.018  
-0.005  
0.007  
-0.006  
Page 815  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
Sig. (2-tailed)  
0.921  
0.571  
0.73  
0.807  
0.941  
0.929  
0.934  
N
185  
185  
185  
185  
185  
185  
185  
Pearson  
Age  
Correlation  
-0.051  
0.493  
185  
0.017  
0.816  
185  
0.001  
0.987  
185  
0.016  
0.829  
185  
-0.018  
0.811  
185  
0.015  
0.835  
185  
-0.018  
0.803  
185  
Sig. (2-tailed)  
N
Educational  
Attainment  
Pearson  
Correlation  
.248**  
0.001  
185  
.234**  
0.001  
185  
.304**  
0
.331**  
0
.278**  
0
.251**  
0.001  
185  
.280**  
0
Sig. (2-tailed)  
N
185  
185  
185  
185  
No. of Years as  
Cooperative  
Officer  
Pearson  
Correlation  
-0.114  
0.123  
185  
-0.078  
0.289  
185  
-0.088  
0.232  
185  
-0.07  
0.342  
185  
-0.093  
0.209  
185  
-0.092  
0.211  
185  
-0.08  
0.278  
185  
Sig. (2-tailed)  
N
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).  
Legend:  
A = Establish A Cooperative and Perform Cooperative Management.  
B = Develop Human Resources System.  
C = Ensure Safe and Sound Operation of Cooperatives  
D = Implement Effective Financial Management.  
E = Develop Quality Products and Services.  
F = Practice Good Governance of Cooperatives.  
G = Contribute to Social, Economic and Environmental Sustainability.  
Out of 4 profile variables of the cooperative officers tested for relationship to managerial competencies, only  
educational attainment was significantly correlated. This result indicates that the higher the educational  
attainment the respondents have, they most likely have better managerial competencies as to establish a  
cooperative and perform cooperative management (r=.248), develop human resources system (r=.234), ensure  
safe and sound operation of cooperatives (r=.304), implement effective financial management (r=.331), develop  
quality products and services (r=.278), practice good governance of cooperatives (r=.251) and contribute to  
social, economic and environmental sustainability (r=.280). The null hypothesis of no significant relationship is  
rejected. This result suggests that educational attainment of the respondents is a contributory factor of their  
managerial competencies. Officers with higher educational attainment tends to have better knowledge, skills and  
attitude. This shows that this element are vital to the person to perform better in the execution of their job roles.  
Education reflects the level of knowledge mastery an individual possesses in understanding a subject,  
particularly in academic settings. The higher an individual's education level, the higher their level of tolerance  
Page 816  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
to risks (Wahyuni & Pramono, 2021). This is due to the perception that higher education levels entail substantial  
knowledge and proficiency, enabling the individual to analyses and assess potential risks effectively. Highly  
educated individuals possess broad insights and knowledge (Anggraeni, 2017). Better educational background  
correlates with increased competence. Such individuals are more inclined and confident in decision-making, as  
well as more willing to take risks due to their acquired knowledge (Tanusdjaja, 2018).  
Education is among the crucial factors in human resource development. It holds significant influence over an  
individual's productivity. A higher level of education tends to lead to greater individual productivity and  
contributes to better work quality as it enables a person to apply his/her knowledge to effectively complete tasks  
(Ukkas, 2017). The higher the education level, the greater the competence and quality of the workforce.  
Education reflects a level of wisdom that is connected to an individual's cognitive capacity; it broadens one’s  
mind in accepting new ideas and encourages scientific thinking. Education teaches a person a variety of skills  
and abilities (Chaerani & Gusvita, 2022). In Malaysia, formal education is provided to students between the age  
of 6 to 17 years old. Both formal and informal education are critical in shaping an individual's behavior, ethics,  
values, and personality (Vasan, 2020). An individual's competencies, including skills and knowledge, can be  
nurtured through education and training (Manalu et al., 2017). A higher level of education makes it easier for a  
person to adapt to changes.  
Correlation Analysis between Cooperatives Profile and Financial Performance  
Table 3.12  
Correlation Analysis between Cooperatives Profile and Financial Performance  
Cooperative Profile  
Correlation  
Performance  
Years of Cooperative Existence  
Pearson Correlation  
Sig. (2-tailed)  
N
-0.025  
0.883  
37  
Common Bond of Membership  
Number of Initial Cooperators  
Pearson Correlation  
Sig. (2-tailed)  
N
-0.088  
0.603  
37  
Pearson Correlation  
Sig. (2-tailed)  
N
0.092  
0.587  
37  
The correlation analysis between cooperatives profile and financial performance was found no significant  
relationship. Years of cooperative existence and performance (r=-0.025; p>0.05); common bond of membership  
and performance (r==0.088; p>0.05) and number of initial co-operators and performance (r=0.092; p>0.05). The  
null hypothesis of no significant relationship is accepted. This result suggests that the years of cooperative  
existence do not mediate to their financial performance. The performance of the cooperative cannot be predicted  
by their year of existence, in can vary by year. The cooperative affect their financial performance by size, smaller  
cooperatives with lower total assets may have higher returns than larger cooperative. Share capital was also a  
factor for greater ability to improve their products and services. In like manner, the common bond of membership  
do not influence the financial performance as indicated in the result of the correlation coefficient. A common  
Page 817  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
bond of membership is a pre-existing condition that causes people to associate with each other, share common  
goals, and work together to achieve them. A cooperative can only have one common bond of membership, which  
can be residential, occupational, associational, or institutional. Weak member engagement and governance  
practices can lead to financial mismanagement and other challenges that can jeopardize a cooperative's financial  
stability. Finally, the number of initial cooperators do not intervene to the financial performance of the  
cooperative as indicated in the correlation coefficient result. This result indicates that number of members do  
not influence the cooperative financial performance.  
Correlation Analysis between Managerial Competencies and Cooperative Financial Performance  
Table 3.13  
Correlation Analysis between Managerial Competencies and Cooperative Financial Performance  
Managerial Competencies  
Correlation  
Pearson Correlation  
Sig. (2-tailed)  
N
Performance  
-0.053  
0.47  
MCEstablish  
185  
Pearson Correlation  
Sig. (2-tailed)  
N
-0.081  
0.274  
185  
MCDevtHuman  
MCEnsure  
Pearson Correlation  
Sig. (2-tailed)  
N
-0.055  
0.455  
185  
Pearson Correlation  
Sig. (2-tailed)  
N
-0.078  
0.291  
185  
MCImplement  
MCDevtQua  
Pearson Correlation  
Sig. (2-tailed)  
N
-0.092  
0.211  
185  
Pearson Correlation  
Sig. (2-tailed)  
N
-0.06  
0.42  
MCPractice  
MCContri  
185  
Pearson Correlation  
Sig. (2-tailed)  
-0.056  
0.447  
Page 818  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
N
185  
The correlation analysis between managerial competencies and cooperative financial performance was found no  
significant relationship. The null hypothesis of no significant relationship is accepted. This result suggests that  
the managerial competencies of cooperative officers do not influence the financial performance of the  
cooperative. Although the officers are educationally qualified for the position and possesses the required skills  
and knowledge to initiate programs that will improve the financial performance, there are some factors that the  
cooperative needs to consider meeting a fair performance. Similarly, the officers may use measurement system  
which they can use to determine the marginal benefits from a specific program. Besides, they should have viable  
measurement metrics for making informed decisions about the systems to adopt in order to improve the financial  
performance.  
Literature is replete with many managerial competences-financial performance relationship studies; however  
these studies have always yielded differing results. For example, Ssekakubo et al. (2014) in their study on savings  
and credit cooperatives in Uganda report a positive and significant relationship between managerial  
competencies and financial performance. Similar findings are reported by Yahaya and Segbenya, (2023) and  
Apreku-Djan (2022). Conversely, Rivera and Melo (2022), and Wijaya and Irianto (2018), while studying same  
relationship found non-significant effects.  
Based from the findings of the study and as to its purpose of recommending possible necessary, relevant and  
timely interventions such as innovative actions as to improve the management of agricultural micro cooperatives  
specifically on the aspect of management competency of its officers. The proposed action plan is presented  
herein provide emphasis to the following specific managerial competencies as notably found out in the results  
of the study; ability to establish and strengthen partnership with other cooperatives, ability to apply, administer,  
and manage HRM systems and processes, ability to establish an updated Management Information System (MIS)  
and data analytics, ability to comply with standard cooperative Performance Audit Report (PAR)-Governance  
& Management Report and Financial Performance Report (Stability, Turn-Over Ratio, Efficiency, Profitability,  
Structure of Assets (STEPS), ability to adopt and adapt Total Quality Management (TQM) principles and  
practices for cooperatives, ability to develop cooperative strategic plan and ability to institutionalize a Youth  
Development Program (YDP) in the cooperative.  
Proposed Action Plan  
Activities  
Objectives  
Persons  
Involved  
Resources  
Time  
Frame  
Expected  
Outcomes  
100%  
Establish  
strengthen  
partnership  
and Foster collaborative relationships BOD,  
with other cooperatives to Committe self-  
with enhance mutual benefits.  
Cooperative First  
quarter of collaboration  
e
generated  
annual  
calendar  
of  
and  
partnership  
other cooperatives  
Chairmen and  
, Manager externally  
and Coop sourced out operation. cooperatives  
Staff.  
Increase  
knowledge-sharing  
cooperatives.  
cooperation  
and  
among  
with  
other  
funds  
and If possible and  
other  
resources.  
all  
year stakeholders.  
Develop strategic partnerships to  
achieve common goals.  
round of  
operation.  
Enhance collective influence and  
advocacy  
interests.  
for  
cooperative  
Promote inter-cooperative trade  
and business opportunities.  
Page 819  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
Application  
of. Align  
HR  
practices  
with BOD,  
Cooperative All  
year 100% applied  
Human Resources cooperative values and principles. Appropri self-  
round of HRM  
Management  
systems  
processes  
ate  
generated  
operation. systems and  
processes.  
. Foster a culture of member-  
ownership and participation.  
and  
Committe and  
e/its  
externally  
Chairman sourced out  
. Develop  
procedures that  
enhance  
making.  
HR  
policies  
support  
and  
and  
and  
funds  
and  
members, other  
Manager resources.  
and Coop  
democratic  
decision-  
Staff.  
. Enhance  
transparency  
and  
accountability in HR practices.  
. Ensure  
compliance  
with  
cooperative laws and regulations.  
Establish  
an Enhance decision-making with Appropri Cooperative All  
year 100%  
applicable  
updated  
and data-driven and based insights.  
ate  
Committe generated  
e/its and  
Chairman externally  
and sourced out  
self-  
round of updated  
operation management  
information  
Improve operational efficiency  
and effectiveness.  
Management  
Information (MIS)  
and data analytics  
processes  
system  
system  
data  
and  
Increase  
accountability.  
transparency  
and  
and  
members, funds  
Manager other  
and  
analytics.  
and Coop resources.  
Staff.  
Support strategic planning and  
performance monitoring.  
Ensure  
data  
security  
and  
compliance.  
Effective  
Systematic  
Compliance  
Reporting  
mandated Annual  
Performance Audit  
Report (PAR).  
and Accurate  
effectiveness and efficiency of ate  
in operations. Committe generated  
for e/its and  
Chairman externally  
and  
evaluation  
of  
the Appropri Cooperative Last  
100%  
self-  
quarter of compliance  
the  
calendar  
of  
to  
the  
mandated  
Annual  
Identify areas for improvement  
and optimization.  
sourced out operation. Performance  
members, funds  
Manager other  
and  
Audit Report  
(PAR).  
Provide  
recommendations  
for  
corrective actions based from the  
result Performance Audit Report  
(PAR)  
and Coop resources.  
Staff.  
Enhance  
transparency  
and  
accountability.  
Support  
solving,  
planning  
strategic  
decision-making  
based  
problem  
and  
from  
Page 820  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
Performance  
(PAR).  
Audit  
Reports  
Establish  
implement  
Quality  
Management  
(TQM) principles (TQM).  
and practices for  
or Enhance operational efficiency Appropri Cooperative All  
Total and effectiveness thru ate self-  
implementation and practice of Committe generated  
Total Quality Management e/its and  
Chairman externally  
and sourced out  
year 100%  
round of improved  
operation. internal  
cooperative  
business  
processes.  
Improve  
member  
and  
client  
cooperatives  
members, funds  
Manager other  
and  
satisfaction and experience.  
and Coop resources.  
Staff.  
Enhance  
accountability.  
transparency  
and  
Reduce  
costs  
and  
improve  
financial sustainability.  
Align  
management  
processes  
with cooperative values and  
principles.  
Develop a sound Define and operationalize the BOD,  
Cooperative First  
100%  
cooperative  
cooperative's mission, vision, and Appropri self  
quarter of completed  
strategic plan  
values.  
ate  
generated  
the  
cooperative  
Committe and  
calendar  
of  
strategic plan  
Identify  
objectives.  
strategic  
goals  
and  
e/its  
externally  
Chairman sourced out operation  
and funds and  
members, other  
Manager resources.  
and Coop  
Develop  
business plan.  
a
comprehensive  
Enhance member engagement  
and participation.  
Staff.  
Ensure long-term sustainability  
and growth.  
Page 821  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
.
Institutiona- Empower youth to participate in Appropri Cooperative First  
100%  
lization of a Youth cooperative  
governance  
and ate  
Committe generated  
e/ its and  
Chairman externally  
self  
quarter  
and  
throughou development  
programs on  
youth  
Development  
decision-making.  
Program (YDP) in  
the cooperative  
Develop young leaders and future  
cooperative leaders.  
t all year initiated  
by  
and  
sourced out round of the  
members, funds  
Manager other  
and Coop resources.  
Staff.  
and operation. cooperative.  
Enhance youth engagement and  
participation  
activities.  
in  
cooperative  
Foster a culture of innovation and  
entrepreneurship among youth.  
Ensure cooperative sustainability  
and succession planning.  
9. Strengthening  
Financial  
Develop and implement a long- Appropri Cooperative All  
term financial literacy program. ate self- round of financial  
Adopt and continue Financial Committe generated operation performance  
Inclusion Through (FIT) e/ its and  
Chairman externally  
and sourced out  
year 100% sound  
Performance  
cooperatives program.  
Improve financial sustainability  
and stability.  
members, funds  
Manager other  
and  
and Coop resources.  
Staff.  
Enhance profitability and return  
on investment (ROI).  
Increase financial transparency  
and accountability.  
Optimize resource allocation and  
utilization.  
Ensure compliance with financial  
regulations.  
CONCLUSION  
Based on the findings of the study, the following conclusions were drawn:  
1. The agricultural micro cooperative officers were dominated by male, middle adulthood, college graduate  
and with officers for a short period of time.  
2. Most of the agricultural micro cooperatives respondents of this study existed for a period of 4 -6 years,  
majority had residential as basis of its common bond of membership and was consisted of 15 24 initial  
cooperators.  
3. Six of the core managerial competencies of officers of selected agricultural micro cooperatives within  
the locality of the study these are; to establish a cooperative and perform cooperative management,  
Page 822  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
develop human resources system, ensure safe and sound operation of cooperatives, develop quality  
products and services, practice good governance of cooperatives and contribute to social, economic and  
environmental sustainability was rated and described by the respondents as with “enough knowledge and  
ability to perform.” Only, the core managerial competency indicator, to implement effective financial  
management was rated and described by the respondents as “partial knowledge and ability to perform”  
as to their core managerial competency.  
4. Majority of the selected agricultural micro cooperatives served as respondents of this study had a fair  
financial performance rating.  
5. Out of four profile variables of the cooperative officers tested for relationship to managerial  
competencies, only educational attainment has a significant correlation.  
6. The correlation analysis between cooperatives profile and financial performance was found no significant  
relationship.  
7. The correlation analysis between managerial competencies and cooperative financial performance was  
found no significant relationship.  
8. The proposed action plan was formulated based on the findings of the study.  
RECOMMENDATIONS  
Based on the findings and conclusion of the study, the following recommendation were drawn:  
1. The agricultural micro cooperative within the locality of the study may establish strong collaboration  
with other cooperatives to strengthen their linkages in terms of mutual benefits, knowledge sharing and  
partnership to achieve a common goal.  
2. The Cooperative Development Authority including complementing provincial (PCLEDOs, etc) and  
municipal (CDOs) level agencies and other government agencies specially State, Universities and  
Colleges (SUCs) and private stakeholders on cooperatives may conduct orientation trainings with the use  
and implementation of Human Resource Management HRM) system and processes that are aligned to  
the cooperative laws and regulations. Additionally, to conduct trainings and development interventions  
to assist the agricultural micro cooperative to implement a Management Information System (MIS) and  
data analytics useful in the management problem solving and decision-making.  
3. The agricultural micro cooperative may develop a customized systematic performance audit report to  
comply with the CDA mandatory performance audit reports.  
4. The agricultural micro cooperative may expert efforts to achieve a sound financial performance through  
vibrant financial literacy program of its members.  
5. The conduct of similar or related study in a larger scope is hereby encourage to compare the findings of  
the study and to achieve better inferential results  
6. The proposed action plan may be adopted as applicable by the agricultural micro cooperative within the  
locality of the study.  
7. Future researches is highly recommended on the same study conceptual framework in a wider scope with  
the use of other methodology, locale and samples.  
Page 823  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
REFERENCE MATERIALS  
Bibliography  
1. Abdullah, M. N. (2017). Practice of Competence among Islamic Education Lecturers at Teacher  
Education Institute in Malaysia. Fakulti Tamadun Islam, UTM.  
2. Anggraeni, A. D. (2017). eacher Personality Competence Shapes Early Childhood Independence (Case  
Study at Mutiara Kindergarten, Tapos Depok). AWLADYꢀ: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak, 3(2), 28-47.  
doi:10.24235/awlady.v3i2.1529  
3. Apreku-Djan, P. K., Ameyaw, F., Ayittah, S. K., Opare, E. A., & Apreku, I. K. O, “Effect of Managerial  
Competence on Value-Based Financial Performance of Banks”. International Journal of Academic  
Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(7), 692 726, 2022.  
4. Aslan, Mustafa; Pamukcu, Ayse (2017) Managerial Competencies And Impact On Management Levels,  
Retrieved:  
agement_Levels#Full-Text  
5. Ballesteros, Marife M., Ancheta, Jenica A. (2020) The Role of Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries  
Organizations (ARBOs) in Agriculture Value Chain, Discussion Paper- Philippine Institute for  
Development Studies.  
6. Binaoro, Axel Joseph L. (2015) Assessment of Cooperative Officers’ Leadership Competencies in  
Oroquieta City, Philippines: Retrieved  
7. Bishwas, S. K. (2015). Achieving organization vitality through innovation and fexibility: an empirical  
study. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 16(2), 145156.  
8. Boyatzis, Richard E. (1982) The Competent Manager: A Model for Effective Performance.  
9. Boyatzis,  
Richard  
E.  
(2008)  
Competencies  
in  
the  
21st  
century.  
Retrieved:  
10. Chaerani, D. S., & Gusvita, H. (2022). Analysis of Characteristics and Income of Hybrid Corn (Zea Mays  
L.) Farmers in Nagari Inderapura Utara, Airpura District, Pesisir Selatan Regency. Science And Research  
Journal Of Mai Wandeu, 2(1), 20-31. doi:10.31933/srjmw.v2i1.61  
11. Cammayo, Eva U. (2022) Financial Performance of Cooperatives in Cagayan Valley, Philippines.  
Retrieved:  
publication/355808011_Financial_Performance_of_Cooperatives_in_Cagayan_Valley_Philippines  
12. Cisi, M., & Centrone, F. A. (2021). The human capital for value creation and social impact: The  
interpretation  
of  
the  
IR’s  
HC  
definition.  
Sustainability,  
13(13),  
6989.  
13. Commission of Higher Education (CHED) Memorandum No. 09 series 2013: Subject: Enhanced Polices  
and Guidelines on Student Affairs and Services.  
14. Coursera (2024). What is a management information system?  
15. Cooperative Development Authority (CDA) Annual Reports 2015 and 2022  
16. Cooperative Development Authority (CDA) Memorandum Circular No. 2021-04 Series 2021, Subject:  
Performance Audit Report (PAR) for Cooperatives.  
17. Cooperative Development Authority (CDA) Memorandum Circular No. 2015-09 Series 2015, Subject:  
Revised Guidelines Implementing the New Training Requirements of Cooperative Officers.  
18. Cooperative Development Authority (CDA) Memorandum Circular No. 2015-05 Series 2015, Subject:  
Guidelines for the Registration of Agriculture Cooperative.  
19. Cooperative Development Authority (CDA) Memorandum Circular No. 2007-07 Series 2007, Subject:  
Revised Categorization of Cooperatives as Amended.  
20. Coursera  
(2024).  
What  
is  
a
management  
information  
system?  
21. Chungyas, Jenelyn I.; Trinidad, Fernando L. (2022) Strategic Management Practices And Business  
Performance Of Cooperatives In Ifugao, Philippines: Basis For Strategic Planning Model. Retieved:  
Page 824  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
net/publication/358419371_Strategic_Management_Practices_And_Business_Performance_Of_Cooper  
atives_In_Ifugao_Philippines_Basis_For_Strategic_Planning_Model  
22. De Torres, J.A.A., Zapata Jr., N.R., Madamba, J.A.B., & Mojica, L.E. (2015). Cooperative Business  
Failures in Batangas Province, Philippines: A Postmortem Analysis.  
23. Habito, Cielito E (2020) Boosting our farm coops: Philippine Daily Inquire, June 09, 2020.  
24. Hailemariam, Bewketu Belay, (2019) Leadership Effectiveness And Competencies Of Management  
Committee  
Of  
Cooperative  
Societies  
In  
Hawassa  
City,  
Snnpr,  
Ethiopia.  
Retrieved:  
27. Gietzen,  
Thomas.  
2017.  
The  
exposure  
of  
microfinance  
institutions  
to  
financial  
risk.  
inancial_risk Review of Development Finance xxx (2017), PP 1-14  
28. Haryono, Agus; Mujiarto; Triatmanto, Boge; Wahyuni, Nanik (2020) Descriptive Analysis of  
Cooperative Management Competency Enhancement for Increasing Members’ Welfare and Business  
Strategies. Retrieved:  
ent_Competency_Enhancement_for_Increasing_Members'_Welfare_and_Business_Strategies  
29. ILO  
(2024).  
Cooperatives  
and  
the  
Sustainable  
Development  
Goals.  
org/global/topics/green-jobs/publications/WCMS_233199/lang-- en/index.htm  
30. Implementing Rules and Regulations of Republic Act No. 9520, the “The Cooperative Code of 2008”  
31. Implementing Rules and Regulations of Republic Act No. 11364, otherwise known as the “Cooperative  
Development Authority Charter of 2019”  
32. Kim, J. Y., Hsu, N., Newman, D. A., Harms, P. D., & Wood, D. (2020). Leadership perceptions, gender,  
and dominant personality: The role of normality evaluations. Journal of Research in Personality, 87,  
103984.  
33. Manalu, M. F., Amanah, S., Asngari, P. S., & Ginting, B. (2017). Competence Levels of Tradisional  
Restaurant Owners of Class at Anyer Beach and Carita Beach in Banten Province. International Journal  
of Sciences, 35(1), 1-11. Retrieved from  
34. Masuku, T., Masuku, M., & Mutangira, J. (2016). Performance of Multi-Purpose Cooperatives in the  
Shiselweni Region of Swaziland. International Journal of Sustainable Agricultural Research, 3(4), 58–  
35. McClelland, D.C., (1973). “Testing for competence rather than intelligence”, American Psychologist,  
Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 1-40.  
report/  
37. Ngumo, Harun Mubeu (2022) Managerial Competence and Performance: A Theoretical Review Harun  
38. Onate, B. B. (2015). Cooperative education among the department of Agrarian reform assisted  
cooperatives in Cagayan. International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social  
Sciences, 4(8), 83-95.  
39. Ordonez, Ernesto, F (2021) An agenda for co-ops, Philippine Daily Inquirer, March 01, 2021.  
40. Pagaddut, J. (2023). Financial conditions and performances of cooperatives in Ifugao,  
Philippines. Information Sciences Letters, 12(8), 16.  
41. Peña-Miguel, N., Corral-Lage, J., & Esteban, J. I. D. L. P. (2017). A first approach to a public financial  
information system for social benefits. European Research Studies, 20(2), 109.  
42. Philip, H. (2022). 6 ways you can improve the quality of your product or service.  
d#:~:text=Chief%20Executive%20Officer%20of%20Helix%20Management%20Group&text=Improvi  
ng%20product%20quality%20is%20integral,to%20fry%20like%20making%20money.  
Page 825  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
43. Pokharel, K., Archer D., & Featherstone, A. (2018). The impact of size and specialization on the financial  
performance of agricultural cooperatives. Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management, 8(2),  
44. Punia, BK; Bhardwaj, Anand (2013) Managerial Competencies and their Influence on Managerial  
Performance: A Literature Review. Retrieved:  
on_Managerial_Performance_A_Literature_Review  
45. Republic Act No. 9520, the “The Cooperative Code of 2008”.  
46. Republic Act No. 11364, “Cooperative Development Authority Charter of 2019”.  
47. Republic Act. No. 11535, “An act making the position of Cooperatives Development Officer mandatory  
in the municipal, city and provincial levels”.  
48. Rincon-Roldan, F., & Lopez-Cabrales, A. (2022b). Linking organisational values and sustainability: the  
role of AMO practices. Personnel Review, 51(6), 16511671. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-06-2020-0414  
49. Rubinstein, R. L., Girling, L. M., De Medeiros, K., Brazda, M., & Hannum, S. (2015). Extending the  
framework of generativity theory through research: A qualitative study. The Gerontologist, 55(4), 548-  
559.  
50. Sanchez, R., Heene, A. (2004), The New Strategic Management: Organizations, Competition and  
Competence. John Wiley & Sons.  
51. Sanchez, R. (2004), Understanding competence-based management: Identifying and managing five  
modes of competence, Journal of Business Research, Volume 57, pp. 518- 532.  
52. Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, P. S. M. (2008). Competence at Work models for superior performance. John  
Wiley & Sons.  
53. Shamsuddin, Z., Mahmood, S., Ghazali, P. L., Salleh, F., & Nawi, F. A. M. (2018). Indicators for  
cooperative performance measurement. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and  
Social Sciences, 8(12), 577585. DOI:10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i12/5056  
54. Simkhada, N. (2017). Indicators for Measuring Performance of Financial Cooperatives in Nepal. Journal  
55. Ssekakubo, J., Ndiwalana, G. & Lwanga, F, “Managerial Competency and the Financial Performance of  
Savings, Credit and Cooperative Societies in Uganda”, International Research Journal of Arts and social  
Science, 3(3), pp. 66-74,  
56. Tanusdjaja, H. (2018). Individual Investor Investment Decisions Based on Competence, Overconfidence,  
and Education. Muara Journal of Economics and Business, 2(1), 234-244. doi:10.24912/jmieb.v2i1.998  
57. Technical Education and Skills Development Authority (TESDA) (Updated). Competency Standards-  
Cooperative Development and Management Level IV, Social, Community Development and other  
Services Sector.  
58. Ukkas, I. (2017). Factors Affecting Labor Productivity in Palopo City Small Industries.: Journal of  
59. UW-Madison  
Center  
for  
Cooperatives  
(2020).  
Community  
&
Economic  
Development.  
60. Vasan, M. (2020). Moderating effect of demographic and business characteristics on performance of  
women owned small enterprises: Empirical evidence from India. Serbian Journal of Management, 15(2),  
319-333. doi:10.5937/sjm15-21922  
61. Wahyuni, A. N., & Pramono, N. H. (2021). The Influence of Demographic Factors and Investor  
Psychological Factors in Making Investment Decisions in the Digital Economy Era. Indonesian Journal  
of Sustainable Accounting, 4(1), 7391. doi:10.32493/JABI.v4i1.y2021.p73-91  
62. Veliu, Liridon; Manxhari, Mimoza. (2017) The Impact of Managerial Competencies On Business  
63. White, R. W. (1959). Motivation Reconsidered: The Concept of Competence. Psychological Review, 66,  
64. Wijaya, E. R. & Irianto, D. (2018). “Analysis Influence of Managerial Competence, Technical  
Competence, and Strategic Competence on Firm Performance in Electrical Engineering Company in  
Page 826  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
65. Wilcox, Yuanjing. (2012) An Initial Study to Develop Instruments and Validate  
the Essential  
Competencies for Program Evaluators (ECPE) A Dissertation Submitted To The Faculty Of The  
Graduate School Of The University Of Minnesota, Retrieved:  
66. Yahaya, R. & Segbenya, M. (2023). “Modelling the influence of managerial competence on managerial  
performance in the Ghanaian banking sector”, Humanities and social sciences communications.  
67. Yu, X., Liu, W., Qing, L., & Zhang, D. (2022). Improving Farm Cooperatives’ Performance and  
Sustainability:A Study of Agricultural Managers’ Competencies Based on the Grounded Theory and the  
APPENDICES  
Appendix A. List of 2023 Compliant Agricultural Micro Cooperatives in the Province of Isabela  
(Municipal Address, Year Registered, Category, Type, Status and Asset Size)  
N
Year  
Registere  
d
Municipa  
l Address  
Categor  
y
o. Name of Cooperative  
Type  
Status  
Asset  
Size  
Agricultur Complia  
nt  
Farm vestment Agriculture Cooperative  
Lateral D2 Agriculture Cooperative  
Alicia  
Alicia  
2021  
2021  
2019  
2021  
2020  
2021  
2021  
2019  
2021  
2019  
2021  
Primary  
Primary  
Primary  
Primary  
Primary  
Primary  
Primary  
Primary  
Primary  
Primary  
Primary  
e
Micro  
Micro  
Micro  
Micro  
Micro  
Micro  
Micro  
Micro  
Micro  
Micro  
Micro  
Agricultur Complia  
nt  
e
Lomboy  
(LOMBACO)  
Agriculture  
Cooperative Angadana  
n
Agricultur Complia  
nt  
e
Benito  
Soliven  
Agricultur Complia  
e nt  
East Isabela Agriculture Cooperative  
Agricultur Complia  
nt  
Dacque Farmers Agriculture Cooperative Cabagan  
Cauayan Forest Region Agriculture Cauayan  
e
Agricultur Complia  
e nt  
Cooperative (CFRACO)  
City  
Isabela West Tanap Farmers Agriculture Cauayan  
Cooperative  
Agricultur Complia  
e nt  
City  
Agricultur Complia  
nt  
Jamas Agriculture Cooperative  
Cordon  
e
Upper Forest Region Agrarian Reform  
Cooperative  
Agricultur Complia  
nt  
Echague  
Echague  
e
Blue Circle Grains Trading Agriculture  
Cooperative  
Agricultur Complia  
nt  
e
Ilagan  
City  
Agricultur Complia  
nt  
Morado Agriculture Cooperative  
e
Page 827  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
Timpuyog Dagiti Mannalon Iti Hasyenda Ilagan  
Agricultur Complia  
nt  
2017  
2019  
2021  
Primary  
Primary  
Primary  
Primary  
Primary  
Primary  
Santa Isabel Agriculture Cooperative  
City  
e
Micro  
Micro  
Micro  
Micro  
Micro  
Micro  
Bigkis Diwa Agriculture Cooperative of  
Abulan  
Agricultur Complia  
nt  
Jones  
e
Mallig  
Cooperative  
Plains  
Agrarian  
Reform  
Agricultur Complia  
nt  
Mallig  
e
Sang-gir  
Cooperative (SIMAC)  
Iti  
Mannalon  
Agriculture  
Agricultur Complia  
nt  
Naguilian 2021  
e
Timpuyog iti Rumaraep ti Quezon  
Agriculture Cooperative  
Agricultur Complia  
nt  
Quezon  
Quezon  
2017  
2018  
e
Quezon  
Isabela  
Tobacco  
Growers  
Agricultur Complia  
nt  
Agriculture Cooperative  
e
Ramon Cordon Council of Irrigators  
Association (RAMCOR CIA) Ramon  
Agriculture Cooperative  
Agricultur Complia  
nt  
2018  
Primary  
e
Micro  
Micro  
Micro  
Micro  
Micro  
Micro  
Micro  
Micro  
Timpuyog Iti Mannalon Biag ket Agdur-  
as Agriculture Cooperative (TIMBAC)  
Agricultur Complia  
nt  
San Isidro 2021  
San Isidro 2018  
Primary  
Primary  
Primary  
Primary  
Primary  
Primary  
Primary  
e
San Isidro North Agrarian Reform  
Cooperative (SINARCO)  
Agricultur Complia  
nt  
e
NDC-8 Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries San  
Agricultur Complia  
e nt  
2018  
2020  
2021  
2021  
2021  
Cooperative  
Manuel  
Callang Grains Production And Trading San  
Agricultur Complia  
e nt  
Agriculture Cooperative  
Manuel  
San  
Mariano  
Indigenous  
Farmers San  
Mariano  
Agricultur Complia  
nt  
Agriculture Cooperative (SMIFAC)  
e
Malaya  
Cooperative  
Sustainable  
Agriculture San  
Mariano  
Agricultur Complia  
e nt  
San  
Pablo  
Bitabian  
Agriculture San  
Agricultur Complia  
e nt  
Cooperative (SABICO)  
Mariano  
Marasat-Dagupan  
Innovations System (BIS) Agriculture  
Cooperative  
Rice  
Business  
San  
Mateo  
Agricultur Complia  
e nt  
2021  
Primary  
Micro  
Micro  
Micro  
Micro  
Dacque Upland Farmers Organization Santa  
Agriculture Cooperative (DUFO) Maria  
Agricultur Complia  
nt  
2021  
2017  
2017  
Primary  
Primary  
Primary  
e
Mozzbuenas  
Cooperative  
Farmers  
Agriculture Santa  
Maria  
Agricultur Complia  
nt  
e
Divisoria Sta. Maria Farmers Agriculture Santa  
Agricultur Complia  
e nt  
Cooperative  
Maria  
Page 828  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
Paculagu  
Agriculture Cooperative  
Irrigators  
Association Santa  
Maria  
Agricultur Complia  
nt  
2018  
Primary  
e
Micro  
Micro  
Namnama Ti Masakbayan Agriculture Santiago  
Agricultur Complia  
e nt  
2020  
Primary  
Cooperative  
City  
United  
Agriculture  
COOP)  
BANGSPAVILCA  
Farmers  
Santiago  
City  
Agricultur Complia  
nt  
Cooperative  
(U-BANGS  
2018  
Primary  
e
Micro  
Micro  
Micro  
Sinili Vegetable Growers Agriculture Santiago  
Cooperative (SIVEGRACO) City  
Agricultur Complia  
nt  
2019  
2020  
Primary  
Primary  
e
Northeast Luzon Farmers Agriculture Santiago  
Agricultur Complia  
e nt  
Cooperative  
City  
La Salette High School Batch 81  
Agriculture Cooperative (LSHS B81  
COOP)  
Santiago  
City  
Agricultur Complia  
nt  
2020  
Primary  
Primary  
Primary  
e
Micro  
Micro  
Mannalon Ti Tumauini Agriculture  
Cooperative  
Agricultur Complia  
nt  
Tumauini 2019  
e
Nagkaisang  
(NAPAdePA)  
Cooperative  
Padre  
Farmers  
de  
Pamilya  
Agriculture Tumauini 2020  
Agricultur Complia  
nt  
e
Micro  
Appendix B. 2023 - Summary of Stability, Turn-Over, Equity, Profitability, (STEPS) Scores, Common  
Bond of Membership and Initial Number of Cooperators Upon Registration  
Summary/  
Total  
Bond  
Membership  
of Initial Number of  
Cooperators  
No.  
Rating  
Name of Cooperative  
Upon Registration  
STEPS Score Adjectival  
Description  
Farmvestment  
Cooperative  
Agriculture 20  
Fair  
Residential  
18  
Lateral D2 Agriculture Cooperative 29  
Fair  
Fair  
Residential  
Residential  
33  
18  
Lomboy Agriculture Cooperative 33  
(LOMBACO)  
East  
Cooperative  
Isabela  
Agriculture 38  
Satisfactory  
Fair  
Residential  
Residential  
Occupational  
36  
15  
23  
Dacque  
Cooperative  
Farmers  
Agriculture 23  
Cauayan Forest Region Agriculture 33  
Cooperative (CFRACO)  
Fair  
Page 829  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
Isabela  
West  
Tanap  
Farmers 34  
Fair  
Residential  
16  
Agriculture Cooperative  
Jamas Agriculture Cooperative  
33  
Fair  
Fair  
Residential  
Residential  
15  
30  
Upper Forest Region Agrarian 27  
Reform Cooperative  
Blue  
Circle  
Grains  
Trading 22  
Fair  
Residential  
26  
Agriculture Cooperative  
Morado Agriculture Cooperative  
29  
Fair  
Fair  
Residential  
Residential  
28  
29  
Timpuyog Dagiti Mannalon Iti 34  
Hasyenda Santa Isabel Agriculture  
Cooperative  
Bigkis  
Cooperative of Abulan  
Diwa  
Agriculture 39  
Satisfactory  
Fair  
Residential  
Residential  
Residential  
Residential  
Residential  
Residential  
21  
19  
35  
32  
32  
41  
Mallig Plains Agrarian Reform 35  
Cooperative  
Sang-gir Iti Mannalon Agriculture 28  
Cooperative (SIMAC)  
Fair  
Timpuyog iti Rumaraep ti Quezon 25  
Agriculture Cooperative  
Fair  
Quezon Isabela Tobacco Growers 29  
Agriculture Cooperative  
Fair  
Ramon  
Cordon  
Council  
of 23  
Fair  
Irrigators Association (RAMCOR  
CIA) Agriculture Cooperative  
Timpuyog Iti Mannalon Biag ket 27  
Agdur-as Agriculture Cooperative  
(TIMBAC)  
Fair  
Residential  
27  
San Isidro North Agrarian Reform 29  
Cooperative (SINARCO)  
Fair  
Fair  
Fair  
Fair  
Residential  
Associational  
Occupational  
Residential  
23  
48  
23  
28  
NDC-8  
Agrarian  
Reform 27  
Beneficiaries Cooperative  
Callang Grains Production And 34  
Trading Agriculture Cooperative  
San Mariano Indigenous Farmers 30  
Agriculture  
(SMIFAC)  
Cooperative  
Malaya Sustainable Agriculture 26  
Cooperative  
Fair  
Residential  
15  
Page 830  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
San Pablo Bitabian Agriculture 26  
Cooperative (SABICO)  
Fair  
Residential  
21  
z
Marasat-Dagupan Rice Business 28  
Fair  
Residential  
17  
Innovations  
System  
(BIS)  
Agriculture Cooperative  
Dacque  
Upland  
Farmers 20  
Fair  
Residential  
23  
Organization  
Agriculture  
Cooperative (DUFO)  
Mozzbuenas Farmers Agriculture 32  
Cooperative  
Fair  
Fair  
Fair  
Fair  
Fair  
Occupational  
Residential  
Residential  
Residential  
Residential  
32  
26  
15  
37  
30  
Divisoria  
Sta.  
Maria  
Farmers 28  
Agriculture Cooperative  
Paculagu Irrigators Association 27  
Agriculture Cooperative  
Namnama  
Ti  
Masakbayan 37  
Agriculture Cooperative  
United BANGSPAVILCA Farmers 35  
Agriculture  
Cooperative  
(U-  
BANGS COOP)  
Sinili  
Vegetable  
Growers 37  
Fair  
Associational  
18  
Agriculture  
(SIVEGRACO)  
Cooperative  
Northeast  
Agriculture Cooperative  
Luzon  
Farmers 29  
Fair  
Fair  
Residential  
Residential  
15  
50  
La Salette High School Batch 81 29  
Agriculture Cooperative (LSHS  
B81 COOP)  
Mannalon Ti Tumauini Agriculture 28  
Cooperative  
Fair  
Fair  
Residential  
16  
21  
Nagkaisang Padre de Pamilya 29  
(NAPAdePA) Farmers Agriculture  
Cooperative  
Associational  
Appendix C. Study Questionnaire  
Disclaimer: Greetings!  
I ALAN V. BAUTISTA, a Ph.D. BA Student at the WESLEYAN university Philippines in Cabanatuan  
City. I am currently conducting a thesis study about the managerial competency of officers and the financial  
performance of selected agricultural micro cooperatives in our province of Isabela. Your cooperative specially  
you as one of its officers is selected to respond by filling-up to the best of your knowledge and ability the prepared  
statements below. Your responses including other data and information obtained will be treated with utmost and  
corresponding confidentiality specially in accordance with the Data Privacy Act of 2012. Your participation and  
Page 831  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
cooperation with the abovementioned study is greatly appreciated as it will surely contribute to further  
understanding and exploring more knowledge specifically the management and financial performance of  
agricultural micro cooperatives.  
Part I: Profile of Respondents  
Direction: Please fill-up the required data and/or information as required applicably.  
1.  
2.  
3.  
4.  
Name (optional): ________________________________________  
Sex: [ ] Male [ ] Female  
Age: _________  
Educational Achievement:  
[ ] Elementary  
[ ] Secondary/High School  
[ ] College  
[ ] Post College/Graduate  
5.  
Years as cooperative officer: __________  
Part II: Profile of (your) Cooperative  
Direction: Please fill-up the required data and/or information as required applicably.  
1. Years of existence or operation: _______  
2. Common bond of membership: __________________  
3. Number of initial co-operators: ________  
Part III: Managerial Competencies  
Please read the statements below carefully and rate each statement below from 1 to 5 as to the degree of how  
you personally agree or disagree based on your experience as officer of your cooperative.  
1 Completely knowledgeable and very able to perform (CK)  
2 Enough knowledge and ability to perform (EK)  
3 Partial knowledge and ability to perform (PK)  
4 Minimal knowledge and ability to perform (MK)  
5 No knowledge and unable to perform (NK)  
CORE COOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT COMPETENCIES  
Establish A Cooperative and Perform Cooperative Management.  
Rating Scale  
1
2
3
4
5
Page 832  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
Able to judiciously implement and enforce cooperative fundamental  
governing laws (RA 9520 & XXX) rules and regulations (CDA MCs) of  
cooperatives.  
Able to formulate relevant and effective cooperative, vision, mission, goals,  
objectives (VMGO), plans, programs and policies.  
Able to establish networking and linkages with government entities  
other cooperative stakeholders.  
and  
Able to establish and strengthen partnership with other cooperatives.  
Able to provide support in the conduct of research and evaluation of  
cooperative operation.  
Able to nourish a cooperative identity.  
Able to foster cooperative culture.  
Able to develop effective cooperative communication plan.  
Able to formulate and implement a cooperative business continuity plan.  
2. Develop Human Resources System  
Able to develop Human Resources Management (HRM) systems and  
processes for cooperatives.  
Able to apply, administer, and manage HRM systems and processes.  
Able to develop and implement human resource capacitation  
(entrepreneurial skills, competencies and activities) plan for cooperatives.  
Able to improve a HRM systems and processes of cooperative.  
3. Ensure Safe and Sound Operation for Cooperatives  
Able to satisfy the roles, perform the duties, responsibilities, accept  
accountabilities and integrate good Filipino values in leading the  
cooperative.  
Able to apply parliamentary procedures in conducting meeting.  
Able to develop a mediation and conciliation program.  
Able to formulate approaches in implementing the mediation and  
conciliation program.  
Able to establish records management.  
Able to integrate necessary technologies (computerization, digitization.  
etc.).  
Page 833  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
Able to establish an updated Management Information System (MIS) and  
data analytics.  
4. Implement Effective Financial Management.  
Able to perform basic cooperative budgeting.  
Able to generate capital and deposits.  
Able to establish and supervise an accounting, auditing and internal control  
system for cooperatives.  
Able to develop and implement effective credit collection strategies.  
Able to manage effectively the cooperative assets and liabilities.  
Able to comply with standard cooperative Performance Audit Report  
(PAR)-Governance & Management Report and Financial Performance  
Report (Stability, Turn-Over Ratio, Efficiency, Profitability, Structure of  
Assets (STEPS).  
Able to identify investment opportunities for cooperatives.  
5. Develop Quality Products and Services  
Able to initiate, create and innovate products and services for cooperatives.  
Able to develop a cooperative marketing program.  
Able to implement a cooperative marketing program and strategies.  
Able to improve internal cooperative business processes.  
Able to adopt and adapt Total Quality Management (TQM) principles and  
practices for cooperatives.  
6. Practice Good Governance for Cooperatives  
Able to promote good governance, implement labor and other related laws.  
Able promote cooperative ethical practices.  
Able to apply principles of management in cooperative.  
Able to develop cooperative strategic plan  
Able to direct a cooperative strategic thrust.  
Contribute to Social, Economic and Environmental Sustainability  
Able to advocate, develop and implement Gender and Development (GAD)  
program.  
Able to institutionalize a Youth Development Program (YDP) in the  
cooperative.  
Page 834  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
Able to advocate an environmental program for cooperative.  
Able to initiate contribution to national cooperative plans and goals.  
7.5  
Able to initiate cooperative projects and programs that contributes  
to the social development of the community.  
Appendix D. Cooperative Financial Performance Rating Evaluation  
(Formulated equivalent performance rating for STEPS per Cooperative Development Authority (CDA)  
Memorandum Circular No. 2021-04 Series 2021, Subject: Performance Audit Report (PAR) for Cooperatives.)  
STEPS Summary/Total  
(Stability, Turn-Over Ratio, Efficiency, Profitability and Structure of Assets)  
Financial Performance Rating Scale  
Adjectival Description  
Excellent  
78-100  
58-77  
Very Satisfactory  
Satisfactory  
38-57  
20-37  
Fair  
19 & Below  
Needs Improvement  
Page 835