INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025
2. Al Abri, M. H., Al Aamri, A. Y., & Elhaj, A. M. A. (2024). Enhancing student learning experiences
through integrated constructivist pedagogical models. European Journal of Contemporary Education and
E-Learning, 2(1), 130-149.
3. Dahlan, J. A., & Wibisono, Y. (2021). The Effect of Hands-On and Computer-Based Learning Activities
on Conceptual Understanding and Mathematical Reasoning. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1),
143-160.
4. Díaz Palencia, J. L. (2025). Integrating challenge-based learning and design thinking in a course of
reaction engines for aerospace. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 53(3), 581-
596.
5. Elkelawy, M., Draz, A. M., Seleem, H. E., & Hamouda, M. A. (2025). Performance Characteristics of
Diesel Engine Power Plants: Efficiency, Emissions, and Operational Flexibility. Pharos Engineering
Science Journal, 2(1), 1-11.
6. Etukudoh, E. A., Usman, F. O., Ilojianya, V. I., Daudu, C. D., Umoh, A. A., & Ibekwe, K. I. (2024).
Mechanical engineering in automotive innovation: A review of electric vehicles and future
trends. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 11(1), 579-589.
7. Gerald Liu, Z., & Munnannur, A. (2019). Future diesel engines. In Design and development of heavy
duty diesel engines: A handbook (pp. 887-914). Singapore: Springer Singapore.
8. Koten, H. (Ed.). (2024). Diesel Engines-Current Challenges and Future Perspectives: Current Challenges
and Future Perspectives. BoD–Books on Demand.
9. Laid, S. M. T., & Adlaon, M. S. (2025). A Systematic Review of Innovative Teaching Strategies in
Science: Exploring Hands-on Learning, Technology Integration, and Student-Centered Approaches.
Acta Pedagogia Asiana, 4(2), 101-114.
10. Matriano, E. A. (2020). Ensuring Student-Centered, Constructivist and Project-Based Experiential
Learning Applying the Exploration, Research, Interaction and Creation (ERIC) Learning Model.
International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 7(1), 214-227.
11. McCormick, M. R., & Wuest, T. (2023, September). Challenges for smart manufacturing and industry
4.0 research in academia: A case study. In IFIP International Conference on Advances in Production
Management Systems (pp. 418-432). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
12. Padilha, M. H. (2023). Enabling fuel system component placement on the basis of geometric and
certification requirements within a semantic knowledge-based engineering framework
13. Peavey, E. K., Zoss, J., & Watkins, N. (2012). Simulation and mock-up research methods to enhance
design decision making. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 5(3), 133-144.
14. Ponce, P., Polasko, K., & Molina, A. (2021). Open innovation laboratory in electrical energy education
based on the knowledge economy. The International Journal of Electrical Engineering & Education,
58(3), 667-700.
15. Porter, J. M. (2018). Navigating Uncertainty in Automotive Technology Instruction: The Subjective
Experiences of Automotive Instructors During Laboratory Activities (Doctoral dissertation, Antioch
University).
16. Ramdi, O. D. (2020). Development of Automotive Engine Electrical Systems Trainer for Automotive
Technology Students. DEVELOPMENT, 2(12).
17. Savin, S. (2007). Autotronics: Implications for automotive related training programs standards based
upon emerging technologies. Oregon State University.
18. Schiuma, G., & Santarsiero, F. (2024). Open Innovation Labs. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
19. Soneral, P. A., & Wyse, S. A. (2017). A SCALE-UP mock-up: Comparison of student learning gains in
high-and low-tech active-learning environments. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(1), ar12.
20. Stam, B. (2011). The Power of Real-World Application. Leadership, 40(3), 12-15.
21. Wafudu, S. J., & Bin Kamin, Y. (2024). Quality assurance: a conceptual framework for teaching and
learning standards in vocational and technical education programs. Quality Assurance in Education,
32(2), 213-231.
Page 1029