INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
A Multi-Parametric Assessment of Infrastructure, Policy, and  
Economic Barriers in Pune’s Wastewater Management  
Dr. Saylee Jog*, Dr. Surabhi Jaju**  
* Assistant Professor, Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, Pune  
** Director, Rustic Art, Satara  
Received: 28 December 2025; Accepted: 02 January 2026; Published: 12 January 2026  
ABSTRACT  
This paper examines Pune’s evolving municipal wastewater management framework as a model for sustainable  
urban development policy in rapidly urbanising Indian cities. Through a comprehensive analysis of infrastructure  
expansion, technological innovation, and regulatory frameworks, we assess the effectiveness of decentralised  
treatment strategies in addressing urban environmental challenges. Our study reveals that despite significant  
infrastructure investments totalling ₹1,173 crore under the JICA-funded Project for Pollution Abatement of River  
Mula-Mutha (PARMM), Pune continues to face a 503 MLD daily treatment gap, with only 49% of generated  
sewage receiving treatment. Using a multi-parametric policy assessment, integrating performance data from 11  
sewage treatment plants, policy documents, and environmental monitoring reports, the research finds that while  
technological diversification demonstrates promise, persistent funding delays, land acquisition disputes, and the  
"subsidy barrier" in water pricing threaten environmental sustainability outcomes. The research contributes to  
sustainable urban development literature by demonstrating how policy integration, technology choice,  
institutional coordination, and financial sustainability mechanisms determine wastewater management  
effectiveness.  
Keywords: Urban Wastewater Policy, Decentralised Treatment, Circular Economy, Infrastructure Financing,  
Pune Municipal Corporation, JICA.  
INTRODUCTION  
Rapid urbanisation in the Global South has fundamentally outpaced the development of sanitary infrastructure,  
creating a severe public health and environmental crisis. In India, the challenge is acute; according to the Central  
Pollution Control Board (CPCB), Class I and Class II cities generate over 72,000 Million Litres per Day (MLD)  
of sewage, yet only 30% is treated. As cities expand, the traditional linear approach to water management - take,  
use, discharge - has proven ecologically unsustainable and economically inefficient.  
This paper investigates the transition toward integrated water management systems, using Pune, a major IT and  
industrial hub in Maharashtra, as a representative case study. Pune’s context is critical due to its geographic  
placement upstream of the Bhima River basin, where local discharge directly impacts downstream water security  
for the Ujani Dam reservoir. The city currently generates approximately 1,000 to 1,200 MLD of sewage, yet the  
installed and operational treatment capacity lags significantly.  
The objective of this research is to identify the policy and implementation barriers that prevent the closure of  
this gap. We move beyond simple capacity statistics to examine the institutional frictions - specifically between  
funding bodies, municipal execution, and regulatory oversight - that hinder the realisation of 100% treatment  
targets. Furthermore, we analyse the economic viability of "circular economy" proposals in a market where  
freshwater remains heavily subsidised.  
Page 1327  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
METHODOLOGY  
This study adopts a multi-parametric policy assessment approach to evaluate the efficacy of Pune’s wastewater  
management strategies. The methodology relies on two distinct pillars of analysis:  
Quantitative Performance Assessment: Primary data regarding STP performance were collated from Pune  
Municipal Corporation (PMC) environmental status reports and Maharashtra Pollution Control Board (MPCB)  
audits for the fiscal years 2022-2024. Key performance indicators included:  
Operational Capacity Utilisation: The ratio of actual sewage treated versus the design capacity of the  
plant.  
Effluent Quality Compliance: Adherence to Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) < 10 mg/L and  
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) < 50 mg/L standards.  
Policy and Regulatory Review: We examined key statutory frameworks governing the sector, including the  
National Urban Sanitation Policy (NUSP), the Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation  
(AMRUT), and the specific terms of the JICA-funded PARMM project. The analysis concentrates on the  
differences between projected milestones and actual ground-level completion rates.  
Scope and Methodological Limitations: While this study utilizes specific case comparisons for contextual  
benchmarking, the analytical framework remains primarily descriptive and diagnostic rather than inferential.  
Due to limitations on manuscript length, a comprehensive inferential statistical analysis comparing Pune with a  
broader cohort of Indian cities is excluded from this specific paper. Extensive comparative studies involving  
Nagpur, along with other national and international case studies utilising diverse wastewater treatment  
methodologies, are documented in the authors' larger body of work. Consequently, this paper prioritises a deep-  
dive diagnostic assessment of Pune’s specific institutional and economic barriers over broad statistical  
generalisation.  
STUDY AREA AND INFRASTRUCTURE PROFILE  
3.1 Geographic Context: Pune is situated at the confluence of the Mula and Mutha rivers. The rapid expansion  
of the municipal limits, including the recent merger of 23 peri-urban villages, has increased the administrative  
area to over 518 sq. km, significantly straining existing sewerage networks.  
3.2 Existing Infrastructure: The city currently operates a network of 10-11 major Sewage Treatment Plants  
(STPs) with a cumulative installed capacity of approximately 567 MLD, though operational capacity is often  
lower (approx. 477 MLD). The technology mix includes:  
Activated Sludge Process (ASP): Used in older plants like Dr. Naidu Hospital STP.  
Sequential Batch Reactor (SBR): Utilised in newer plants at Mundhwa and Kharadi to minimise land  
footprint.  
Table 1: Inventory of Major Operational STPs in Pune (Selected)  
STP Location  
Technology  
ASP  
Installed Capacity  
(MLD)  
115  
Operational Status / Key Issues  
Operational: frequent hydraulic overload  
during peak hours.  
Dr. Naidu  
Hospital  
ASP  
130  
45  
Operational issues with sludge handling and  
disposal.  
Functional; critical for downstream irrigation  
reuse.  
Bhairoba Nala  
SBR  
Mundhwa  
Page 1328  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
SBR  
ASP  
40  
Functional; experiences downtime due to  
power fluctuations.  
Operational; aging civil structure requires  
refurbishment.  
Kharadi  
50  
Erandwane  
Total (Citywide)  
Includes other minor plants  
~567  
Source: Compiled from PMC Environmental Status Reports (2022-23)  
RESULTS AND ANALYSIS  
4.1 The Treatment Deficit: Our analysis reveals a persistent divergence between generation and treatment.  
While the city generates an estimated 980-1200 MLD of sewage, the operational treatment capacity captures  
less than half of this volume. This results in a daily deficit of over 500 MLD. The untreated load is discharged  
directly into river bodies, causing eutrophication and spiking coliform levels in the Mula-Mutha river stretch.  
Table 2: Comparative Analysis of Sewage Generation vs. Treatment (2023-24)  
Parameter  
Projected Sewage Generation (Peak)  
Value (Estimates)  
1,200 MLD  
Total Installed Treatment Capacity  
Actual Operational Treatment Capacity  
Treatment Gap (Deficit)  
567 MLD  
477 MLD  
~503 - 723 MLD  
~40% - 49%  
Percentage of Sewage Treated  
Source: Analysis based on MPCB Water Quality Monitoring Data (2023)  
Technology Performance Gaps: While SBR technology theoretically offers higher effluent quality, our  
research indicates frequent operational failures.  
Energy Dependence: SBR plants require an uninterrupted power supply for their cyclic aeration phases.  
Frequent outages in peri-urban zones lead to bypassing of treatment cycles.  
Maintenance Deficits: Advanced electromechanical components often face downtime due to delays in  
spare part procurement  
Skill Gap: Since it is a new technology and highly capital-intensive, there is a lack of skilled technical  
manpower.  
The "Implementation Paralysis" of JICA Funding: The Project for Pollution Abatement of River Mula-  
Mutha (PARMM), funded by JICA (₹1,173 crore), was designed to bridge the gap by constructing 11 new STPs  
with a cumulative capacity of 396 MLD. However, our review identifies "implementation paralysis" as a key  
finding.  
Table 3: Summary of Proposed JICA (PARMM) Infrastructure & Status  
Project Component  
Details  
Total Budget  
Allocation  
₹1,173 Crore  
Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA)  
396 MLD  
Funding Agency  
New Capacity  
Planned  
Page 1329  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
11  
Number of New STPs  
Key Delay Factors  
Land Acquisition (Baner, Balewadi); Tender Cost Escalations; Central Govt.  
Clearance Latency  
Source: Author’s own compilation  
Land Acquisition Disputes: Critical sites in Baner and Balewadi faced prolonged litigation. Unlike  
greenfield projects, urban retrofitting requires land that is often legally encumbered.  
Procedural Latency: The project faced significant delays in the tendering phase due to cost escalations  
requiring revised approvals from the Central Government, pushing the timeline back by over three years.  
DISCUSSION: BARRIERS TO SUSTAINABILITY  
5.1 The Subsidy Barrier and the Circular Economy: A core finding of this study is the failure of the "circular  
economy" model due to distorted market economics. According to Section 5 of the Government Resolution  
passed by the Maharashtra Government on 30th November 2017 regarding Urban Wastewater Management,  
Recycling and Reuse Policy, Thermal Power plants must use treated water available within a 50 km radius. It is  
allocated the first priority of reuse of treated water. The treated water can also be used for Industrial use by  
MIDCs, Railways or other bulk users, Agricultural use and Other non-potable use as per MPCB norms. The  
profits from selling treated water are allocated to the respective ULBs. Fresh water supply must be stopped to  
entities that reuse treated water. Furthermore, the use of treated wastewater will generate a two-fold benefit –  
save freshwater and generate revenue for STP operators. However, the practical uptake is negligible.  
Institutional Fragmentation: There is a notable lack of coordination between the water supply department  
(planning intake) and the sewage department (handling discharge). This siloed approach prevents the  
development of a unified "One Water" strategy. Furthermore, the regulatory capacity of the MPCB is limited to  
periodic monitoring, with insufficient punitive power to enforce compliance on non-performing municipal  
assets.  
Peri-Urban Sprawl: The inclusion of 23 new villages into the PMC limits has created a dichotomy in service  
levels. These areas rely heavily on septic tanks. Without a dedicated faecal sludge management (FSM) policy  
for these non-sewered areas, the focus on centralised STPs fails to address the pollution load from the periphery.  
RECOMMENDATIONS  
To address these systemic gaps, a phased roadmap is proposed.  
Short-term Interventions (1-3 Years)  
Optimisation of Existing Assets: Immediate refurbishment of electromechanical components in older  
ASP plants to restore design capacity.  
Faecal Sludge Management (FSM): Implementation of scheduled septic tank cleaning services for the  
newly merged villages, where sewerage networks will take years to develop.  
Operator Training: Establishing a "Certified STP Operator" course in collaboration with technical  
institutes to address the skills gap in handling SBR technology.  
Medium-term Structural Reforms (4-7 Years)  
Differential Tariff Pricing: State-level intervention is required to rationalize fresh water tariffs. Pricing  
for industrial fresh water must be increased to make treated wastewater economically attractive.  
Page 1330  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
Green Bonds: Issuance of municipal green bonds to finance the "gap funding" required for operations  
and maintenance (O&M), ensuring that plants do not shut down due to budgetary constraints.  
Dual Distribution Networks: Mandating dual piping systems in all new large-scale residential  
townships (over 100 units) to utilise treated water for flushing and gardening locally.  
Long-term Institutional Changes (8-15 Years)  
Resource Recovery Systems: Transitioning STPs from waste disposal units to resource recovery centres  
that generate energy (biogas) and fertiliser (compost), thereby offsetting O&M costs.  
Watershed-Level Management: Moving beyond municipal limits to a river-basin authority approach,  
ensuring that upstream and downstream urban local bodies coordinate their discharge standards.  
Policy Harmonisation: Aligning state and central policies to develop unified quality standards for reuse,  
supported by a rigorous third-party certification regime.  
Scaling and Replication: Successful scaling requires identifying anchor buyers through mandatory off-take  
agreements with thermal power plants and industrial estates. Enabling regulatory frameworks must address  
sector-specific standards and fast-track approval processes for reuse projects.  
CONCLUSION  
Pune’s wastewater management challenges is a result of broader systemic issues in urbanisation. The technology  
to treat water exists, and capital, although delayed, is available. The critical failure points are institutional and  
economic. The gap between sewage generation and treatment is not merely a funding issue, but a symptom of  
undervalued water resources and failures in land governance. Future policy must prioritise regulatory  
enforcement and market-creation for treated by-products. Sewage management is a priority in terms of public  
health, water resource management & environmental responsibility. Without shifting the sector from a "public  
health obligation" to a "resource recovery industry," the gap between sewage generation and treatment will  
continue to widen. Sustainable urban development requires not just infrastructure, but a fundamental realignment  
of the economic incentives that govern water & treated wastewater use.  
REFERENCES  
1. Ahluwalia, I. J. (2019). Urban Governance in India: Journal of Urban Policy, 12(3), 45-67.  
2. Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB). (2021). National Inventory of Sewage Treatment Plants. Delhi:  
Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change.  
3. Corcoran, E., et al. (2010). Sick Water? The Central Role of Wastewater Management in Sustainable  
Development. UN-Habitat.  
4. Government of Maharashtra. (2017). Urban Sewage Management (Recycle & Reuse) Policy  
(Government Resolution No. STP-2017/C.R.325/UD-33). Urban Development Department, Mantralaya,  
Mumbai.  
5. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). (2022). Project for Pollution Abatement of River Mula-  
Mutha in Pune. Project Status Report Vol. 4.  
6. Maharashtra Pollution Control Board (MPCB). (2023). Water Quality Monitoring of Bhima River Basin.  
Mumbai: MPCB.  
7. Ministry of Urban Development (MoUD). (2008). National Urban Sanitation Policy. Government of  
India.  
8. NITI Aayog. (2019). Composite Water Management Index 2.0. Government of India.  
9. Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC). (2022). City Sanitation Plan Update. Pune: PMC.  
10. Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC). (2023). Environment Status Report 2022-23. Pune: PMC Health  
Department.  
11. Starkl, M., et al. (2013). Status of centralized and decentralized approaches for wastewater management  
in India. Water Science & Technology, 68(12), 2565-2573.  
Page 1331  
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,  
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)  
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XIV, Issue XII, December 2025  
12. World Bank. (2018). Wastewater: From Waste to Resource - The Case of the Circular Economy.  
Washington, DC.  
13. Biswas, A. K., & Seetharam, K. E. (2008). Achieving water security for Asia. International Journal of  
Water Resources Development, 24(1), 145-176.  
14. Sato, T., et al. (2013). Global, regional, and country level need for data on wastewater generation,  
treatment, and use. Agricultural Water Management, 130, 1-13.  
15. Planning Commission of India. (2011). Report of the Working Group on Urban and Industrial Water  
Supply and Sanitation for the Twelfth Five-Year Plan (2012-2017).  
16. Kelkar, P. S., & Pande, S. P. (2010). Wastewater treatment in India: Challenges and future prospects.  
Journal of Indian Water Works Association, 42(3), 195-203.  
17. Massoud, M. A., Tarhini, A., & Nasr, J. A. (2009). Decentralized approaches to wastewater treatment  
and management: Applicability in developing countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(1),  
652-659.  
18. Anders, N. (2018). Institutional Constraints in Indian Urban Water Management. Asian Journal of Public  
Administration, 32(2), 112-128.  
Page 1332