INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue I, January 2026
candidates who qualify for the positions. Furthermore, peace education programs should be broad enough in
scope in order to include topics that help to promote transparency as well strengthen accountability, and promote
inclusivity. Additionally, positive peace education may help in creating a fair and equitable environment in
which all teachers achieve their full potential. This way we can enhance teacher motivation and morale as well
as improve the quality of teaching and learning, and this build a more sustainable, just and inclusive society.
Positive Peace Education
Having explored teachers' experiences of direct and structural violence as well as the causes of direct and
structural violence, we propose positive peace education as an important tool for resolving direct and structural
violence. . Gultang (1996) suggests that there is cultural violence, direct violence, and structural violence, there
are equally three types of positive peace education. These are direct positive peace education, cultural positive
peace education and structural positive peace education.Positive peace education (PPE) builds on Johan
Galtung's (1969) theory of positive peace, which emphasizes the importance of addressing not only direct
violence, but also structural and cultural violence, to achieve sustainable peace.positive peace education
(PPE) seeks to move beyond the absence of direct violence to address the deeper structural and cultural roots of
injustice and exclusion, including poverty, racism, colonization, patriarchy, and exploitative attitudes to the
environment.1The ideas behind the concept of positive peace education is that when people are exposed to the
ideals of positive peace education, they will have enlightened minds that can critically and clearly respond to
issues of all forms of violence in a peaceful manner and thus behave as human beings who as per the IEP's
positive peace frame work do business happily and peacefully(because the environment is sound), share
information freely, accept and respect the rights of others, attain low levels of corrupt activities, have good
relations with their neighbors and can equitably share resources with fellow citizens. The above mentioned eight
pillars of positive peace are key in reducing community conflict that may have subsequent adverse effects on the
well-being of teachers.
As stated earlier above, there are three types of positive peace education which I suggest as follows; direct
positive peace education, cultural positive peace education and structural positive peace education. Direct
positive peace education entails direct actions of peace aimed at mitigating direct violence. Examples of direct
positive peace according to Galtung (1996) are physical and verbal kindness that are relevant and good to the
body of others and self. Love is the epitome of this: a union of bodies, minds and spirits (Galtung, 1996:32).
Structural positive peace education on the other hand refers to the process of educating the human mind in order
to help resolve the problems of segmentation, marginalization, exclusion, penetration and fragmentation within
organizations. According to Galtung(1996) structural positive peace is significant because it helps in ensuring
that there is freedom instead of repression, there is equity instead of exploitation, dialogue instead of penetration,
integration instead of segmentation, solidarity instead of fragmentation and participation, participation instead
of marginalization. Structural positive peace education is key in resolving structural violence related problems
that affect teachers.
Cultural positive peace education is important for resolving cultural violence. Cultural positive peace education
refers to a process of teaching and learning that helps the educands to get rid of cultures that generate, perpetuate
and sustain violence against teachers. Similarly, Galtung (1996) points out that cultural positive peace upholds
the legitimation of peace as opposed to the legitimation of violence. In other words this entails the building of a
culture of positive peace through education. Therefore, cultural positive peace education would consist of
transformation of conflicts through the building of a culture of positive peace through religion, the media, the
law, language, art and science (Galtung, 1996: 32).
1 Aizat Arystanbek, Assemgul Bukutova, Gulbagira Toleu, Lynne Parmenter, Hilary Cremin, Assylzhan Ospanbek,
Implementing positive peace education in schools: A systematic literature review of global practices,
Educational Research Review,Volume 50,2026,100759,ISSN 1747-938X,
Page 217