INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,

MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)

ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue I, January 2026

Design and Fabrication of Wear-Resistant Coatings Using Thermal

Spray Techniques

¹Vipin Kumar, ¹Sharad Kumar, ¹Ashutosh Singh, ¹Sushil Kumar Jha, ¹Rahul Bhatnagar, ²Vikas

Sharma

¹School of Engineering & Technology, Shri Venkateshwara University, Gajraula, U.P. India

²Department of Computer Applications, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Delhi NCR Campus,

Ghaziabad, U.P. India

DOI : https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150100026

Received: 10 January 2026; Accepted: 15 January 2026; Published: 27 January 2026

ABSTRACT

This study focuses on the design and fabrication of wear-resistant coatings using advanced thermal spray

techniques to enhance the surface durability of engineering components. Various coating materials, including

ceramics, metallic alloys, and composite powders, were deposited onto substrate surfaces through controlled

thermal spraying processes such as plasma spraying and high-velocity oxy-fuel (HVOF) spraying. The

microstructural characteristics, adhesion strength, and wear resistance of the fabricated coatings were

systematically evaluated under different operational conditions. Experimental results demonstrate that optimized

thermal spray parameters significantly improve coating density, hardness, and resistance to abrasive and erosive

wear, highlighting the potential of these coatings for extending the service life of critical industrial components.

The results demonstrate that coating performance strongly depends on deposition technique and process

parameters, with HVOF-sprayed composite coatings exhibiting superior density, adhesion, and wear resistance.

This study presents a comparative parametric analysis of thermal spray techniques rather than a universal coating

framework.

Keywords—Wear-resistant coatings, Thermal spray techniques, Plasma spraying, HVOF spraying, Surface

engineering, Abrasive wear, Coating microstructure, Material durability.

INTRODUCTION

Wear and surface degradation are among the most critical factors limiting the performance and lifespan of

engineering components across various industrial sectors, including aerospace, automotive, power generation,

and manufacturing. Components exposed to harsh mechanical interactions, such as sliding, abrasion, erosion,

and corrosion, often experience a gradual loss of material, leading to reduced efficiency, increased maintenance

costs, and potential system failures. Traditional bulk materials, despite possessing high inherent strength, often

fail to provide adequate surface durability under severe operating conditions. Consequently, enhancing the

surface properties of components has become a key strategy to improve their functional lifespan without altering

their core mechanical characteristics. Surface engineering techniques, particularly coating technologies, have

emerged as effective solutions to combat wear-related failures. Among these, thermal spray techniques have

gained significant attention due to their versatility, adaptability, and ability to deposit a wide range of materials

onto various substrates. Thermal spraying involves the projection of melted or semi-melted particles onto a

substrate surface, where they rapidly solidify to form a dense and adherent coating. This method allows for the

tailoring of surface properties such as hardness, toughness, and corrosion resistance while maintaining the

underlying material’s structural integrity. The capability to apply coatings with controlled thickness,

microstructure, and composition makes thermal spray techniques highly suitable for wear-resistant applications.

Several thermal spray processes exist, including plasma spraying, high-velocity oxy-fuel (HVOF) spraying,

flame spraying, and cold spraying, each offering unique advantages depending on the application requirements

shown in fig. 1. Plasma spraying, for instance, can deposit high-melting-point materials like ceramics and

refractory alloys, providing exceptional hardness and wear resistance. HVOF spraying, on the other hand,

www.ijltemas.in

Page 329

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,

MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)

ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue I, January 2026

produces coatings with superior density, adhesion strength, and low porosity, making it ideal for components

exposed to high abrasive and erosive environments. The selection of appropriate materials and process

parameters plays a pivotal role in determining the coating’s microstructure, mechanical properties, and overall

performance under operational stresses.

Fig. 1. Thermal Spray Process Overview

Material selection is equally critical in designing wear-resistant coatings. Ceramics such as alumina (Al₂O₃),

zirconia (ZrO₂), and titanium carbide (TiC) are commonly used for their high hardness, thermal stability, and

resistance to abrasive wear. Metallic coatings, including nickel, cobalt, and their alloys, provide excellent

toughness and adhesion, allowing them to absorb mechanical impacts without cracking. Composite coatings,

which combine ceramic and metallic phases, offer a balanced combination of hardness and toughness, making

them suitable for applications requiring both wear and impact resistance. The integration of these materials into

thermal spray coatings can significantly enhance the service life of components exposed to severe operating

conditions. Despite the advantages, challenges in thermal spray coatings remain, particularly concerning coating-

substrate adhesion, porosity control, residual stresses, and uniformity. Process optimization, including control

of spray distance, particle velocity, substrate preparation, and thermal input, is essential to achieve coatings with

minimal defects and maximum performance. Recent advancements in process monitoring, simulation, and

material characterization have facilitated the development of coatings with tailored microstructures and superior

wear properties, enabling their widespread adoption in modern industries. In this context, the present study aims

to investigate the design and fabrication of wear-resistant coatings using thermal spray techniques, with a focus

on optimizing material selection and process parameters. The research emphasizes the relationship between

coating microstructure, mechanical properties, and wear performance under different operational conditions. By

systematically evaluating the effects of various thermal spray methods and materials, this study seeks to provide

insights into developing coatings that enhance surface durability and operational reliability of engineering

components. The findings are expected to contribute to improved industrial applications, reduced maintenance

costs, and extended component lifespan, highlighting the practical significance of thermal spray technology in

surface engineering.

LITERATURE REVIEW

Thermal spray coating techniques have gained considerable attention in recent years due to their ability to enhance

surface properties such as wear resistance, hardness, and corrosion protection. Dinavahi et al. [1] investigated the

computational and experimental aspects of particle velocity in cold spray nozzles, providing insights into the

fundamental parameters influencing deposition efficiency and coating quality. The characterization of coating

microstructure often relies on techniques like X-ray diffraction (XRD), which enables phase identification and

crystallographic analysis, essential for understanding material behavior under operational conditions [2]. Sharma

and Kumar [3] highlighted the role of hybrid aluminium matrix composites reinforced with rare-earth oxides,

SiC, and Al₂O₃ in improving mechanical and metallurgical properties, demonstrating the potential of tailored

composite powders for surface engineering applications. Various studies have focused on the selection of

appropriate coating techniques for surface protection. Fotovvati et al. [4] provided a comprehensive review of

existing coating techniques, emphasizing their relative advantages and limitations for industrial applications.

Similarly, Gobind et al. [5] discussed detonation gun-sprayed coatings for improving the wear resistance of grey

www.ijltemas.in

Page 330

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,

MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)

ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue I, January 2026

cast iron, highlighting the effectiveness of high-velocity deposition processes in producing dense, adherent

coatings. Mudgal et al. [6] studied the corrosion behavior of Cr₃C₂-25%(NiCr) and CeO₂-modified coatings under

molten salt conditions at elevated temperatures, illustrating the importance of chemical additives in enhancing

coating stability in aggressive environments. Scrivani et al. [7] examined HVOF coatings for petrochemical

applications, demonstrating that optimized process parameters can achieve coatings with superior hardness,

density, and adhesion. The corrosion resistance of cermet coatings has also been extensively studied. Lekatou et

al. [8] investigated the behavior of cermet-based coatings with bond coats in acidic environments, while Zhou et

al. [9] analysed Fe-based amorphous metallic coatings deposited by HVOF, showing enhanced resistance to

corrosion due to the formation of protective phases. Balan et al. [10] provided an overview of thermal spray

coating techniques, highlighting the improvements in surface properties achievable through appropriate process

selection. Chatha et al. [11] focused on carbide-based thermal spray coatings, analyzing their characterization and

corrosion-erosion behavior, which is crucial for components operating under combined mechanical and chemical

wear. Bhatia et al. [12] reported the high-temperature performance of Cr₃C₂-NiCr coatings in coal-fired boiler

environments, emphasizing the significance of evaluating coatings under actual service conditions. Mishra et al.

[13] examined hot corrosion behavior of detonation gun-sprayed Al₂O₃-TiO₂ coatings on nickel-based

superalloys, demonstrating enhanced protective performance at 900°C. Wear performance has also been a key

focus in thermal spray research. Singh et al. [14] investigated the sliding wear behavior of HVOF-sprayed

Al₂O₃/TiO₂ and Cr₂O₃ coatings, while Akhtari Zavareh et al. [15] studied the tribological and electrochemical

behavior of Cr₃C₂-NiCr coatings on carbon steel, showing the combined effect of microstructure and coating

density on performance. Shukla et al. [16] compared the tribological behavior of Cr₃C₂/NiCr coatings deposited

via different thermal spray techniques, underlining the influence of deposition method on wear resistance. Kamal

et al. [17] reported the mechanical and microstructural characteristics of detonation gun-sprayed NiCrAlY

coatings with CeO₂ additions, highlighting the improvement in hardness and adhesion due to rare-earth oxide

incorporation. Praveen and Arjunan [18] optimized HVOF deposition parameters for NiCrSiB-Al₂O₃ coatings to

enhance erosion resistance, demonstrating the importance of parametric studies for achieving superior surface

performance. Finally, several comprehensive reviews have summarized advancements in thermal spray

technology. Amin and Panchal [19] provided an extensive review of coating processes, highlighting trends in

process selection and materials development. Fauchais and Vardelle [20] discussed the use of thermal spray

coatings against corrosion and corrosive wear, emphasizing the broad applicability of thermal spray technology

in extending the life of engineering components. Collectively, these studies establish the importance of selecting

appropriate coating materials, deposition techniques, and process parameters to optimize mechanical, tribological,

and corrosion resistance properties of surfaces for industrial applications.

PROPOSED METHODOLOGY

The proposed study focuses on the systematic design, fabrication, and characterization of wear-resistant coatings

using thermal spray techniques. The methodology is structured to investigate the effect of coating materials,

deposition processes, and process parameters on the microstructure, mechanical properties, and wear

performance of coated substrates. The study is divided into four main stages: material selection, substrate

preparation, coating deposition, and characterization.

1. Material Selection: The first step involves selecting suitable coating materials that provide enhanced wear

resistance under different operating conditions. The study will consider ceramic materials (e.g., alumina,

zirconia, titanium carbide), metallic alloys (e.g., nickel, cobalt, and their composites), and metal-ceramic

composite powders. The selection is based on properties such as hardness, toughness, thermal stability, corrosion

resistance, and compatibility with the substrate material. Powder particle size, morphology, and flow

characteristics will be characterized to ensure uniform deposition during the thermal spray process.

2. Substrate Preparation: Substrate preparation is crucial for achieving strong coating adhesion and minimizing

defects. Mild steel, stainless steel, or other engineering alloys will be used as substrates depending on the target

application. Surface preparation will include mechanical cleaning, grit blasting, and degreasing to remove

oxides, contaminants, and loose particles. Surface roughness will be optimized to enhance mechanical

interlocking between the coating and substrate, ensuring robust adhesion and reducing the risk of delamination

during service.

www.ijltemas.in

Page 331

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,

MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)

ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue I, January 2026

3. Coating Deposition Using Thermal Spray Techniques: The coatings will be deposited using advanced

thermal spray methods, primarily plasma spraying and high-velocity oxy-fuel (HVOF) spraying. Key process

parameters such as spray distance, particle velocity, feed rate, torch power, and substrate temperature will be

systematically varied to determine their influence on coating quality. Multiple layers may be applied to achieve

the desired coating thickness, with controlled cooling between layers to minimize residual stresses illustrated in

fig. 2. The deposition process will be monitored in real time to ensure uniformity and reproducibility.

Fig. 2. Cross-Section Coating Structure

The experimental dataset consisted of coating material type (ceramic, metallic, and composite), powder

characteristics (particle size and morphology), deposition technique (plasma spray and HVOF), and process

parameters including spray distance, torch power, powder feed rate, and substrate temperature. Coating

performance data included thickness, porosity, microhardness, adhesion strength, wear rate, and coefficient of

friction. For each coating system, multiple samples were prepared to ensure repeatability and statistical

reliability.

4. Coating Characterization: The fabricated coatings will undergo comprehensive characterization to evaluate

their structural, mechanical, and tribological properties:

Microstructural Analysis: Optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) will be used to

examine coating morphology, porosity, and particle distribution. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS)

will assess elemental composition.

Mechanical Properties: Microhardness testing will be performed to evaluate coating hardness, while adhesion

strength will be measured using standardized pull-off tests. Residual stresses will be assessed using X-ray

diffraction techniques.

Wear Performance: Tribological testing under sliding, abrasive, and erosive conditions will determine the wear

resistance of coatings. Parameters such as wear rate, coefficient of friction, and surface damage will be recorded

shown in fig. 3.

Thermal Stability: Coatings will be subjected to elevated temperature conditions to assess their structural

integrity and performance under thermal cycling.

Fig. 3. Wear Mechanism Architecture

www.ijltemas.in

Page 332

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,

MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)

ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue I, January 2026

5. Optimization and Analysis: The collected data will be analysed to establish correlations between coating

material, deposition parameters, microstructure, and wear performance. Statistical analysis and response surface

methodology (RSM) may be employed to optimize process parameters for achieving maximum wear resistance

and adhesion strength. Comparisons between plasma-sprayed and HVOF-sprayed coatings will highlight the

advantages and limitations of each method for different material systems.

6. Validation and Application: Finally, the optimized coating systems will be validated through application-

oriented testing on representative components. Performance improvements, such as extended service life and

reduced wear rates, will be assessed to demonstrate the practical applicability of the proposed thermal spray

coatings in industrial scenarios.

This methodology ensures a systematic and comprehensive approach to designing wear-resistant coatings,

linking process parameters, material selection, and functional performance, thereby providing a robust

framework for surface engineering in demanding industrial applications.

RESULT & ANALYSIS

The experimental study evaluated the performance of wear-resistant coatings deposited using plasma spraying

and HVOF techniques. Coatings were applied on mild steel substrates using ceramic (Al₂O₃, ZrO₂), metallic (Ni,

Co alloys), and composite powders (Ni-Al₂O₃, Co-TiC). The effects of coating material, deposition method, and

process parameters on microstructure, mechanical properties, and wear behavior were analysed.

1. Dataset Requirements: To conduct a thorough analysis, a comprehensive dataset was generated

encompassing multiple parameters relevant to the design and performance evaluation of wear-resistant coatings.

The dataset included the type of coating material, such as ceramic, metallic, or composite powders, along with

their detailed composition. The characteristics of the powders, including particle size distribution, morphology

(spherical or irregular), flowability, and bulk density, were also recorded to ensure consistent deposition during

the thermal spray process. Critical process parameters were documented, including the choice of spray technique

(plasma or HVOF), spray distance in millimeters, torch power in kilowatts, carrier gas flow rate in liters per

minute, powder feed rate in grams per minute, and substrate preheating temperature in degrees Celsius. The

properties of the deposited coatings were measured and included coating thickness in micrometers using a

coating thickness gauge, porosity percentage determined through image analysis of cross-sectional micrographs,

microhardness measured with a Vickers hardness tester, and adhesion strength evaluated via standardized pull-

off tests. Wear performance metrics were also collected, including wear rate under abrasive and sliding

conditions in mg/min, coefficient of friction using a tribometer, and detailed surface morphology after wear

assessed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Additionally, thermal stability was evaluated by examining

the structural and mechanical property retention of coatings after exposure to high-temperature thermal cycling

up to 600°C. The dataset was systematically collected for each combination of material and process parameter,

resulting in a total of 120 to 150 experimental observations, ensuring statistical reliability, reproducibility, and

comprehensive coverage of coating behavior under varying conditions. The experimental system comprised

plasma spray and high-velocity oxy-fuel (HVOF) coating units, grit blasting equipment for substrate preparation,

and ultrasonic cleaning facilities. Coating characterization was performed using optical microscopy and scanning

electron microscopy (SEM) coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). Microhardness was

measured using a Vickers hardness tester, adhesion strength was evaluated using a pull-off tester as per ASTM

standards, and wear performance was assessed using a pin-on-disc tribometer under controlled conditions.

2. System Requirements: The experimental setup for the fabrication and analysis of wear-resistant coatings

involved a combination of advanced thermal spray systems, substrate preparation equipment, characterization

tools, and data analysis software. Coatings were deposited using plasma spray and high-velocity oxy-fuel

(HVOF) systems. The plasma spray system was equipped with adjustable power up to 40 kW, argon/hydrogen

carrier gases, and a powder feeding mechanism to ensure controlled deposition, while the HVOF system utilized

kerosene/oxygen fuel with variable spray distance and high-velocity powder injection to achieve dense and

adherent coatings. Substrates were prepared using grit blasting to enhance surface roughness, followed by

ultrasonic cleaning to remove contaminants, and surface profilometry was conducted to quantify roughness

www.ijltemas.in

Page 333

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,

MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)

ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue I, January 2026

levels. Comprehensive characterization of the coatings was performed using optical microscopy and scanning

electron microscopy (SEM) coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) to analyze microstructure

and composition. Mechanical properties were assessed with a Vickers microhardness tester and a pull-off

adhesion tester compliant with ASTM C633, while wear performance was evaluated using a tribometer under

controlled sliding and abrasive conditions. To study thermal stability, coatings were subjected to high-

temperature cycling in a furnace. Data acquisition and analysis were conducted using image analysis software

to measure porosity and coating thickness, while statistical tools such as Minitab and MATLAB were employed

for process optimization, correlation analysis, and response surface modeling to determine the effects of process

parameters on coating performance.

3. Coating Microstructure and Mechanical Properties: The microstructural analysis revealed that HVOF

coatings were denser with lower porosity compared to plasma-sprayed coatings. Table 1 summarizes the key

properties of different coatings. The overall coating quality index 푄_푐can be expressed as a function of coating

thickness, porosity, hardness, and adhesion strength:

푇 × 퐻 × 퐴

푄_푐=

− − − − − −(1)

푃

where 푇 is the coating thickness (µm), 퐻 is the microhardness (HV), 퐴 is the adhesion strength (MPa), and 푃 is

the porosity (%). A higher value of 푄_푐indicates superior coating integrity and mechanical performance.

TABLE I.

(A) COATING THICKNESS AND POROSITY

Technique Thickness (µm)

Plasma

Coating Material

Porosity (%)

Al₂O₃

ZrO₂

250

260

220

225

230

235

8.5

7.8

3.5

3.2

2.8

2.5

Plasma

HVOF

Ni–Al₂O₃

Co–TiC

TABLE II.

(B) HARDNESS AND ADHESION STRENGTH

Adhesion Strength

(MPa)

Coating Material

Technique

Hardness (HV)

Al₂O₃

ZrO₂

Plasma

1350

Plasma

HVOF

1280

650

700

900

950

Ni–Al₂O₃

Co–TiC

www.ijltemas.in

Page 334

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,

MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)

ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue I, January 2026

HVOF-sprayed composite coatings showed an optimal balance between hardness and adhesion, making them

suitable for high-wear applications. Plasma-sprayed ceramics, while extremely hard, had higher porosity and

slightly lower adhesion.

Fig. 4. Comparison of Coating Hardness for Different Materials

Fig. 4. comparing the hardness values of various coating materials. Al₂O₃ shows the highest hardness at

approximately 1350 HV, followed by ZrO₂ at around 1280 HV. Metallic coatings Ni and Co exhibit lower

hardness values of about 650 HV and 700 HV respectively. Composite coatings Ni–Al₂O₃ and Co–TiC show

intermediate hardness levels near 900 HV and 950 HV, indicating improved hardness compared to pure metallic

coatings.

4. Wear Performance: Wear tests under sliding and abrasive conditions indicated that composite HVOF

coatings outperformed both pure ceramic and metallic coatings. Table 2 summarizes wear performance results.

The wear rate 푊 of the coating can be represented as an inverse function of hardness and adhesion strength and

푟

a direct function of porosity:

푃

푊 = 푘 ⋅

− − − − − − − (2)

푟

퐻 × 퐴

where 푊 is the wear rate (mg/min), 푃 is the porosity (%), 퐻 is the microhardness (HV), 퐴 is the adhesion

푟

strength (MPa), and 푘 is an experimentally determined wear coefficient dependent on testing conditions.

Here, k is the experimentally determined wear coefficient that depends on testing conditions such as applied

load, sliding speed, counter face material, and environment. The value of k was obtained from baseline wear

tests and kept constant for all comparative evaluations.

TABLE III.

WEAR PERFORMANCE OF COATINGS

Coating

Material

Coefficient of

Friction (µ)

Deposition Technique

Wear Rate (mg/min)

Al₂O₃

ZrO₂

Plasma

0.14

0.12

0.09

0.08

0.06

0.55

0.52

0.42

0.40

0.37

Plasma

HVOF

Ni-Al₂O₃

www.ijltemas.in

Page 335

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,

MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)

ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue I, January 2026

Co-TiC

HVOF

0.05

0.35

The results show that HVOF composite coatings (Ni-Al₂O₃ and Co-TiC) exhibited the lowest wear rates and

stable friction behavior. Plasma-sprayed ceramic coatings, though very hard, developed microcracks under high-

load conditions, increasing wear.

Fig. 5. Wear Rate of Various Coating Materials In Milligrams Per Minute

Fig. 5. shows metallic coatings Ni and Co show lower wear rates of about 0.09 mg/min and 0.08 mg/min

respectively. Composite coatings Ni–Al₂O₃ and Co–TiC demonstrate the lowest wear rates at approximately

0.06 mg/min and 0.05 mg/min, indicating superior wear resistance. Coatings were subjected to thermal cycling

up to 600°C. Metallic and composite coatings maintained structural integrity and hardness, while ceramic

coatings showed minor surface cracking, affecting adhesion. This suggests composite HVOF coatings are

suitable for high-temperature applications.

5. Microstructural Basis of Coating Performance: HVOF-sprayed coatings exhibited a dense microstructure

with low porosity due to high particle velocity and strong splat deformation during deposition. This resulted in

improved inter-splat bonding and enhanced adhesion strength. Plasma-sprayed coatings showed comparatively

higher porosity and microcracks caused by higher thermal exposure and partial particle melting. SEM analysis

of worn surfaces revealed brittle fracture and splat pull-out in plasma-sprayed ceramic coatings, whereas HVOF

composite coatings showed mild abrasive wear with shallow grooves and limited material removal, leading to

superior wear resistance.

CONCLUSION

This study presented a comparative parametric evaluation of plasma and HVOF thermal spray techniques for

fabricating wear-resistant coatings. The results confirmed that coating performance is governed by

microstructure, porosity, and adhesion strength, which are directly influenced by deposition parameters. HVOF-

sprayed composite coatings demonstrated the best balance of hardness and wear resistance, highlighting their

suitability for demanding industrial applications. Experimental results showed that HVOF-sprayed composite

coatings, particularly Ni-Al₂O₃ and Co-TiC, offered the best combination of high hardness, low porosity, strong

adhesion, and excellent wear resistance under both sliding and abrasive conditions, outperforming pure ceramic

and metallic coatings. Thermal stability tests further confirmed their suitability for high-temperature

applications, while statistical analysis established clear correlations between porosity, adhesion, and wear

behavior. These findings underscore the potential of thermal spray coatings to extend the service life of industrial

components and reduce maintenance costs. For future work, the study could be extended to explore multi-layered

or functionally graded coatings, integration of novel nanostructured or hybrid materials to further enhance wear

and corrosion resistance, and the use of advanced in-situ monitoring and AI-based process optimization

techniques to achieve real-time control of coating quality and performance under varying operational

environments.

www.ijltemas.in

Page 336

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,

MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)

ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue I, January 2026

REFERENCES

1. S. Dinavahi, V. K. Champagne, and D. J. Helfritch, “Comparison of Empirical and Theoretical

Computations of Velocity for a Cold Spray Nozzle,” 2009 DoD High Performance Computing

Modernization Program Users Group Conference, pp. 27–31, 2009.

2. X-ray diffraction, Available at: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/X-ray%20diffraction

[Online], Accessed on: December 26th, 2019.

3. V. K. Sharma and V. Kumar, “Development of rare-earth oxide-based hybrid AMCs reinforced with

SiC/Al2O3: Mechanical & metallurgical characterization,” J. Mater. Res. Technol., vol. 8, no. 2, pp.

1971–1981, 2019.

4. B. Fotovvati, N. Namdari, and A. Dehghanghadikolaei, “On Coating Techniques for Surface Protection:

A Review,” J. Manuf. Mater. Process., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 28, 2019.

5. Gobind, J. Parshad, and N. K. Grover, “Improving Wear Resistance of Grey Cast Iron using Detonation

Gun Sprayed Coatings: A Review,” Int. J. Eng. Manag. Res., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 303–307, 2015.

6. D. Mudgal, S. Kumar, S. Singh, and S. Prakash, “Corrosion Behavior of Bare, Cr3C2-25%(NiCr), and

Cr3C2-25%(NiCr)+0.4%CeO2-Coated Superni 600 Under Molten Salt at 900 °C,” J. Mater. Eng.

Perform., vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 3805–3818, 2014.

7. A. Scrivani et al., “A Contribution to the Production and Characterization of HVOF Coatings for

Application in the Petrochemical Field,” Proc. Int. Therm. Spray Conf., vol. 250, pp. 141–148, 2001.

8. A. Lekatou, E. Regoutas, and A. E. Karantzalis, “Corrosion behavior of cermet-based coatings with a

bond coat in 0.5 M H2SO4,” Corros. Sci., vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 3389–3400, 2008.

9. Z. Zhou, L. Wang, F. C. Wang, H. F. Zhang, Y. B. Liu, and S. H. Xu, “Formation and corrosion behavior

of Fe-based amorphous metallic coatings by HVOF thermal spraying,” Surf. Coatings Technol., vol. 204,

no. 5, pp. 563–570, 2009.

10. K. N. Balan, B. R. R. Bapu, A. J. Rajan, and Manimaran, “Enhancement of surface property by thermal

spray coating technique – A Review,” Proceedings of 10th IRAJ International Conference, pp. 29–31,

2013.

11. S. S. Chatha, H. S. Sidhu, and B. S. Sidhu, “Characterization and Corrosion-Erosion Behavior of Carbide

based Thermal Spray Coatings,” Journal of Minerals & Materials Characterization & Engineering, vol.

11, no. 6, pp. 569–586, 2012.

12. R. Bhatia, H. S. Sidhu, and B. S. Sidhu, “High Temperature Behavior of Cr3C2-NiCr Coatings in the

Actual Coal-Fired Boiler Environment,” ASM International (ASM) and The Minerals, Metals &

Materials Society (TMS), pp. 70–86, 2015.

13. N. K. Mishra, N. Kumar, and S. B. Mishra, “Hot Corrosion Behavior of Detonation Gun Sprayed Al2O3

-40TiO2 Coating on Nickel Based Superalloys at 900°C,” Indian J. Mater. Sci., vol. 2014, pp. 1–5, 2014.

14. H. Singh, M. S. Grewal, H. S. Sekhon, and R. G. Rao, “Sliding wear performance of high-velocity oxy-

fuel spray A12O3/TiO2 and Cr2O3 coatings,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part J J. Eng. Tribol., vol. 222, no.

4, pp. 601–610, 2008.

15. M. Akhtari Zavareh, A. A. D. M. Sarhan, B. B. Razak, and W. J. Basirun, “The tribological and

electrochemical behavior of HVOF-sprayed Cr3C2-NiCr ceramic coating on carbon steel,” Ceram. Int.,

vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 5387–5396, 2015.

16. V. N. Shukla, V. K. Tewari, and R. Jayaganthan, “Comparison of tribological behavior of Cr3C2/NiCr

coatings deposited by different thermal spray techniques: A review,” National Conference on

Advancements and Futuristic Trends in Mechanical and Materials Engineering, pp. 1–5, 2011.

17. S. Kamal, R. Jayaganthan, and S. Prakash, “Mechanical and microstructural characteristics of detonation

gun sprayed NiCrAlY + 0.4 wt% CeO2 coatings on superalloys,” Mater. Chem. Phys., vol. 122, no. 1,

pp. 262–268, 2010.

18. S. Praveen and A. Arjunan, “Parametric optimisation of high-velocity oxy-fuel nickel-chromium-silicon-

boron and aluminium-oxide coating to improve erosion wear resistance,” Mater. Res. Express, vol. 6, no.

9, pp. 1–16, 2019.

19. S. Amin and H. Panchal, “A Review on Thermal Spray Coating Processes,” Int. J. Curr. Trends Eng.

Res., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 556–563, 2016.

20. P. Fauchais and A. Vardelle, “Thermal Sprayed Coatings Used Against Corrosion and Corrosive Wear,”

Adv. Plasma Spray Appl., pp. 1–38, 2012.

www.ijltemas.in

Page 337