INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue I, January 2026
native methods, like the previously mentioned, north-south orientation of buildings, courtyard ventilation, high
thermal mass walls, and light-colored finishes, were shown to have natural and effective qualities of adapting to
the climate, which made the moderation of the indoor temperatures very effective (Liu et al., 2022; Santos et al.,
2022). The use of these historical methods in the design of buildings provided the necessary help to cope with
the heat, and this was especially in the case of the low-income and informal settlements where the poor
availability of resources prevents the use of energy-consuming active cooling systems and hence the heating that
was done using these methods becomes the only way out for the poor in such areas. Contemporary adaptation
such as building-integrated photovoltaic (PV) shadings, coatings that reflect, and windows-to-walls ratio being
optimised, on the other hand, improved the performance of the old ways without altering the comfort of the
occupants beyond the standards set by the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning
Engineers (ASHRAE) and the adaptive comfort (Kabanshi et al., 2023; Abdulkareem & Al-Maiyah, 2025). One
such pairing was the combination of the cross-ventilation through courtyards and the position of the PV panels
so that they got the sun at the right angle; this allowed cooling and energy production to take place at the same
time, and thus the mechanical systems were not used as much. The combination of local wisdom and modern
simulation-based design is indicative of a context-aware strategy that adapts to the local climate, building type,
and socio-economic limitations. This mixed-method approach not only maintains cultural heritage but also
pushes the development of biomimetic design frameworks based on African architecture. The results indicate
that the next regulations and standards should, in a way, directly increase and reward the fusion of traditional
and modern techniques to achieve the most comfortable indoor climate, minimise power consumption, and
increase resistance to climate change.
Thermal Comfort Benchmarking
According to the review, there was a wide gap between the design intentions and the thermal comfort of the
users. Many modern African buildings that used passive cooling techniques did not always comply with the
ASHRAE 55 or EN 16798 standards (Liu et al., 2022; Dodoo & Ayarkwa, 2019). Data from both field and
simulations showed the PMV values often going beyond the range of ±1, along with PPD values that sometimes
exceeded 20-30%, especially in the case of single-strategy interventions. That is to say, the outcomes revealed
that depending on just one of the passive measures, such as natural ventilation, shading, or high-inertia materials,
would only alleviate the thermal stress to a small extent. On the other hand, integrated, multi-pronged approaches
are put forth as being crucial for comfort thresholds acceptance. So, the combination of ventilation, solar control,
and thermal mass in great detail according to the climate zone, building typology, and occupancy pattern gave
the most consistent results in reducing indoor temperature shifts and discomfort hours. This benchmarking
demonstrates the fundamental requirement for evidence-based design calibration, where cooling systems using
passive means are assessed quantitatively against the standards rather than considered effective. Moreover, the
diverse reporting of thermal performance across studies points out the need for a common PMV/PPD
measurement protocol in African countries that allows more substantial cross-case comparisons and the tracing
of climate-responsive building practices that are adaptable and appropriate.
Energy Implications and Climate Resilience
By reflecting the influence of passive cooling strategies directly on the building energy demand, the combination
of the integrated methods resulted in the power needed for cooling to be reduced by 20–60%, depending on the
climate zone and the strategy used (Kabanshi et al., 2023; Kousis & Santamouris, 2025). With the use of shading
devices, the improved cross-ventilation in hot-humid areas decreased the number of hours that helped discomfort
to reach peak levels, thus there was less dependence on the mechanical cooling system. In the case of arid and
hot-dry zones, the use of high thermal mass materials and reflective surfaces moderated the indoor temperature
so that less energy was consumed by the active cooling systems. Facilitating urban-scale approaches, the
approaches of compact building forms, integration of vegetation, and planting of cool/green roofs helped not
only in localised thermal comfort improvement but also in urban heat-island effect mitigation and, thus, the
overall climate resilience (Benziada et al., 2025; Kousis & Santamouris, 2025). The findings underscore the fact
that passive cooling should not be seen as a concern only at the building level but as a city-wide urban adaptation
strategy with the potential, among others, to cut down heat-related illness, to increase the comfort of the people
living in the city and to make energy usage more equitable in the less affluent African cities. The results signal
Page 511