INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue I, January 2026
Page 1340
www.rsisinternational.org
Job Facets and Job Satisfaction among Library Professionals of
Engineering Colleges in Nepal
Ridhi Shrestha
Library Chief, Kantipur Engineering College, Dhapakhel, Lalitpur, Nepal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.1501000109
Received: 29 January 2026; Accepted: 02 February 2026; Published: 21 February 2026
ABSTRACT
Job satisfaction plays an important role in shaping the effectiveness and productivity of professionals in the
library and information field. This research investigates the level of job satisfaction and the factors that influence
it among library professionals working in engineering college libraries connected with universities and private
institutions across Nepal. From a total population of 120 professionals, 77 completed the Job Satisfaction Survey
(JSS). The collected data were examined using both descriptive and inferential statistical methods such as mean,
standard deviation, correlation, regression analysis, and analysis of variance with the support of Microsoft Excel.
The results show that professional commitment to the library field is a significant predictor of job satisfaction,
contributing to about 31% of the observed variation. No meaningful differences were found based on
demographic or institutional characteristics. Key elements influencing satisfaction included workplace
environment, salary and benefits, transparent promotion systems, perceived academic value of libraries in
engineering education, and professional respect and recognition. The study highlights the need for supportive
organizational environments and stronger professional identity to improve job satisfaction among library
professionals in Nepal.
Keywords: Job satisfaction level, library professionals, demographic factors (gender, age group), work
environment, pay and salary, fairness and promotion criteria
INTRODUCTION
Library professionals play a vital role in supporting learning, research, and community development. According
to Arumugam and Radha (2023), job satisfaction among library professionals significantly influences their
motivation, productivity, and overall well-being.
In academic institutions, particularly engineering colleges, libraries are increasingly equipped with modern
infrastructure and advanced technologies, requiring skilled and technologically proficient library professionals
(Esakkimuthu & Vellaichamy, 2015).
Engineering college libraries demand specialized knowledge in handling technical resources, managing digital
databases, and delivering accurate and timely information services to students, faculty, and researchers. In Nepal,
the expansion of engineering education has increased the need for effective library services, making job
satisfaction among library professionals a critical concern. A supportive work environment—encompassing
physical facilities, organizational culture, leadership, and interpersonal relations—has been identified as a key
determinant of job satisfaction.
Despite the growing importance of library professionals in engineering education, empirical research on their
job satisfaction in the Nepalese context remains limited. This study addresses this gap by examining the level of
job satisfaction among library professionals working in engineering colleges in Nepal and identifying the job
facets that influence their satisfaction.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue I, January 2026
Page 1341
www.rsisinternational.org
Problem Statement
The rapid growth of engineering colleges in Nepal has intensified the demand for efficient library services.
Library professionals are required to manage specialized technical information, adapt to continuous
technological advancements, and meet the evolving needs of academic users. However, the factors influencing
their job satisfaction remain underexplored in the Nepalese context.
Previous studies suggest that job facets such as salary, work environment, promotion opportunities, fairness,
leadership, and professional development significantly affect job satisfaction. However, findings from developed
countries may not be directly applicable to Nepal due to differences in economic conditions, institutional
resources, and socio-cultural factors. The lack of context-specific research makes it difficult for institutions to
design effective policies to improve job satisfaction and service quality.
This study seeks to identify and analyze the job facets influencing job satisfaction among library professionals
in engineering colleges in Nepal.
Research Questions
What are the major facets of job satisfaction among library professionals?
Which job facets most significantly influence job satisfaction?
What is the effect of work environment, pay and salary, fairness, and promotion criteria on job satisfaction
among library professionals?
Objectives of the Study
The main objective of this study is to examine the job facets influencing job satisfaction among library
professionals in engineering colleges in Nepal. The specific objectives are:
To identify the key facets of job satisfaction among library professionals.
To determine the most influential job facets affecting job satisfaction.
To examine the effects of work environment, pay and salary, fairness, and promotion criteria on job
satisfaction.
Significance of The Study
This study contributes to the limited body of literature on job satisfaction among library professionals in
Nepalese engineering colleges. The findings are expected to assist educational institutions and policymakers in
creating supportive work environments, improving promotion and compensation systems, and enhancing overall
library service quality.
Additionally, the study serves as a useful reference for future researchers interested in job satisfaction within
academic and technical library settings.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Theoretical Foundations
Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Theory suggests that fulfilling lower-level needs (physiological and safety)
enables individuals to pursue higher-level needs such as esteem and self-actualization, which are closely related
to job satisfaction.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue I, January 2026
Page 1342
www.rsisinternational.org
Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory (1959) distinguishes between hygiene factors (salary, working conditions,
policies) and motivators (achievement, recognition, responsibility). While hygiene factors prevent
dissatisfaction, motivators enhance job satisfaction.
Job Characteristics Model (Hackman & Oldham, 1976) emphasizes that skill variety, task identity, task
significance, autonomy, and feedback influence job satisfaction and motivation.
Dispositional Theory (Staw et al., 1986) argues that individual personality traits and dispositions also affect job
satisfaction, as employees perceive workplace conditions differently.
Empirical Studies
Previous research indicates that job satisfaction among library professionals is influenced by compensation,
promotion opportunities, leadership style, work environment, recognition, and professional development (Alam,
2005; Ashraf et al., 2008; Igbokwe, 2021).
Studies also highlight the role of transformational and democratic leadership in enhancing job satisfaction
(Rahman et al., 2012; Jeremy & Damilola, 2023).
Although international studies provide valuable insights, there is limited research focusing specifically on
engineering college libraries in Nepal. Existing literature suggests that salary, organizational culture, and
professional status are major determinants of job satisfaction, underscoring the need for context-specific studies.
Conceptual Framework
Based on the literature, job satisfaction is considered the dependent variable, while work environment, pay
and salary, fairness, promotion criteria, and demographic factors (age and gender) are treated as
independent variables. The framework assumes that these job facets have both positive and negative influences
on job satisfaction.
Definition of Variables
Work Environment (WE): The physical, social, and organizational conditions that influence employee
performance and satisfaction.
Pay and Salary (PS): Financial compensation received by employees in exchange for their services.
Fairness (F): Employees’ perception of equity in organizational policies, rewards, and decision-making.
Promotion Criteria (PC): Organizational policies and practices governing career advancement.
Job Satisfaction (JS): Employees’ overall emotional and psychological response to their job and work
environment.
Limitations of the Study
The study is limited to selected engineering colleges in Nepal, which may restrict generalizability.
Only selected job facets were examined.
The study was conducted within a limited time frame.
The accuracy of findings depends on the honesty and perceptions of respondents.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue I, January 2026
Page 1343
www.rsisinternational.org
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, RESULTS, AND DISCUSSION
Research Design
The study adopted a quantitative, descriptive, and analytical research design to examine job satisfaction
among library professionals working in engineering college libraries in Nepal.
The design enabled the measurement of relationships between job facets and overall job satisfaction using
statistical techniques.
Population and Sample
The target population consisted of 120 library professionals employed in engineering college libraries affiliated
with various universities and private institutions in Nepal. Using a convenience sampling technique, 77
respondents from 30 engineering colleges were selected for the study.
Data Collection and Instrument
Primary data were collected using a structured questionnaire adapted from the Job Satisfaction Survey (JSS)
and related literature. Responses were measured on a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Strongly Disagree)
to 5 (Strongly Agree).
Data Analysis Techniques
Data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel. Both descriptive and inferential statistical tools were applied,
including:
Frequency and percentage analysis
Mean and standard deviation
Correlation analysis
Multiple regression analysis
Results and Analysis
Table 1: Demographic Profile of Respondents (n = 77)
Demographic Variable
Category
Frequency
Percentage
Gender
Male
31
40.26
Female
46
59.74
Age Group
25–35 years
19
24.68
36–45 years
38
49.35
46–55 years
20
25.97
Educational Qualification
Bachelor’s Degree
45
58.44
Master’s Degree
32
41.56
Work Experience
1–5 years
21
27.27
6–10 years
39
50.65
Above 10 years
17
22.08
Interpretation: The majority of respondents were female and belonged to the 36–45 age group, indicating a
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue I, January 2026
Page 1344
www.rsisinternational.org
mature and experienced workforce in engineering college libraries.
Table 2: Descriptive Statistics of Study Variables
Variables
Mean
Standard Deviation
Work Environment
4.03
0.42
Pay and Salary
3.98
0.46
Fairness
4.00
0.44
Promotion Criteria
4.03
0.48
Overall Job Satisfaction
4.03
0.39
Interpretation: All variables recorded mean values close to 4.00, indicating a generally high level of satisfaction
among library professionals.
Table 3: Correlation between Job Facets and Job Satisfaction
Independent Variables
Correlation Coefficient (r)
Significance
Work Environment
0.6768
p < 0.01
Pay and Salary
0.6045
p < 0.01
Fairness
0.5497
p < 0.01
Promotion Criteria
0.5116
p < 0.01
Interpretation: All independent variables show a moderate to strong positive relationship with job
satisfaction. Work environment has the strongest correlation.
Table 4: Multiple Regression Analysis Results
Variables
Beta (β)
t-value
Significance
Work Environment
0.4581
5.72
p < 0.01
Pay and Salary
0.3654
4.63
p < 0.01
Fairness
0.3022
3.98
p < 0.01
Promotion Criteria
0.2617
3.41
p < 0.01
R²
0.31
Adjusted R²
0.29
Interpretation: The regression model explains 31% of the variance in job satisfaction. Work environment is
the most influential predictor.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue I, January 2026
Page 1345
www.rsisinternational.org
Table 5: Hypothesis Testing Summary
Hypothesis
Statement
Result
H₁
Work environment significantly influences job satisfaction
Accepted
H₂
Pay and salary significantly influence job satisfaction
Accepted
H₃
Fairness significantly influences job satisfaction
Accepted
H₄
Promotion criteria significantly influence job satisfaction
Accepted
DISCUSSION
The results confirm that job satisfaction among library professionals in Nepalese engineering colleges is
significantly influenced by multiple job facets. The work environment emerged as the strongest predictor,
aligning with Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory and prior empirical findings. Competitive compensation, fairness
in organizational practices, and transparent promotion systems further enhance job satisfaction.
CONCLUSION
The study concludes that improving workplace conditions, ensuring equitable compensation, promoting fairness,
and establishing transparent promotion policies are essential for enhancing job satisfaction among library
professionals in engineering colleges in Nepal. Institutions should prioritize these factors to improve employee
motivation and service quality.
REFERENCE
1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267–
299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601 (08)60108-2
2. Alam, S. T. (2005). Job satisfaction of university women teachers in Bangladesh. Journal of Social
Science, 1(2), 88–91.
3. Ariyo, E. O., & Okwilagwe, A. O. (2020). Influence of organization culture on job satisfaction of library
personnel in selected academic libraries. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 2020 (4016).
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4016
4. Arumugam, J., & Radha, L. (2023). Significant factors of job satisfaction. International Journal of Arts,
Science and Humanities, 1(1), 8–13.
5. Ashraf, M., Joarder, M., & Al-Masum, R. (2008). Job satisfaction of the employees in mobile phone
corporations in Bangladesh: A case study. AIUB Journal of Business and Economics, 7(1), 1–16.
6. Brown, A., & Green, C. (2023). Privacy and digital preservation in academic libraries. Journal of
Library and Information Science, 45(2), 105–118.
7. Dawis, R. V., & Lofquist, L. H. (1967). Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire.
University of Minnesota, Industrial Relations Center.
8. Esakkimuthu, C., & Vellaichamy, A. (2015). Job satisfaction among the library professionals.
International Journal of Digital Library Services, 5(1), 22–37.
9. Gbotoso, A., & Oboh, O. R. (2021). Leadership styles and job satisfaction of library personnel in
university libraries in Ondo State, Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 6525.
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/6525
10. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Text of a
theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250–279.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073 (76) 90016-7
11. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The motivation to work. John Wiley & Sons.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue I, January 2026
Page 1346
www.rsisinternational.org
12. Igbokwe, P. C. (2021). Influence of job satisfaction on librarians' job performance in library. Library
Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 1, 681. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/681
13. Jeremy, A., & Damilola, A. E. B. (2023). Leadership styles, staff motivation and job satisfaction in
private university libraries in Osun State, Nigeria.
14. Jeyaraj, W. J. (2017). Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science. 5(6), 34-41.
15. Karim, N. H. (2008). Investigating the correlates and predictors of job satisfaction among Malaysian
academic librarians. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 13(2), 69–88.
16. Khaleque, A., & Rahman, M. A. (1987). Perceived importance of job facets and overall job satisfaction
of industrial workers. Human Relations, 40(7), 401– 415.
https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678704000701
17. Lazear, E. P., & Moore, R. L. (1984). Incentives, productivity, and labor contracts. The Quarterly
Journal of Economics, 99(2), 275–296. https://doi.org/10.2307/1885669
18. Munir, R., Rahman, R., Malik, A., & Maamor, H. (2012). Relationship between transformational
leadership and employees’ job satisfaction among the academic staff. Procedia - Social and Behavioral
Sciences, 65, 885–890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.215
19. Philip, K. J., & Effiong, E. S. (2018). Workload, librarians’ output and satisfaction in select academic
institutions in South-South zone, Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 2000.
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/2000
20. Psychol, J. A. (1963). Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science. Journal of Abnormal
Psychology .
21. Rahman, R. A. (2012). Relationship between transformational leadership and employees’ job
satisfaction among the academic staff. International Congress on Interdisciplinary Business and Social
Science, 65, 885–890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.215
22. Ratnasari, S. L., Sutjahjo, G., & Adam, M. (2019). Employees’ performance: Organizational culture
and leadership style through job satisfaction. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(5),597–608.
https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr. 2019.7569
23. Sharma, R., & Jyoti, J. (2009). Job satisfaction of university teachers: An empirical study. Journal of
Services Research, 9(2), 51–80.
24. Smith, L. C. (2022). Library and information science, interdisciplinary perspectives: A festschrift in
honor. Library and Information Science, 71(1), 1–10.
25. Staw, B. M., Bell, E., & Clausen, J. A. (1986). The dispositional approach to job attitudes: A lifetime
longitudinal test. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(1), 56–77.
26. Thornton, J. K. (2000). Job satisfaction of librarians of African descent employed in ARL academic
libraries. College & Research Libraries, 61(3), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.61.3.217
27. Weiss, D. J., Dawis, R. V., England, G. W., & Lofquist, L. H. (1967). Manual for the Minnesota
Satisfaction Questionnaire. University of Minnesota, Industrial Relations Center.
