INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 61
www.rsisinternational.org
GIS-Based Spatial Analysis of River Setback Policy Violations and Flood
Vulnerability Along River Ngadda in Maiduguri, Nigeria
*Mustapha Shettima
1,2
., Garba Hassan Sambo.
2
, Ali Garga Bukar
3
, Ali Mai Boyoma
1
and Yakaka
Mustapha
1
1
Department of Environmental Science, Integral University Lucknow, India
2
Department of Geography, University of Maiduguri, Borno State
3
Department of Civil and Water Resources Engineering, University of Maiduguri
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.1502000006
Received: 13 February 2026; Accepted: 18 February 2026; Published: 23 February 2026
ABSTRACT
This paper evaluates riparian buffer zone violations and examine its consequences on the building-level flood
vulnerability along River Ngadda in Maiduguri, northeastern Nigeria. Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
was used to integrate high-resolution satellite images and building footprint data in order to determine structures
in the river channel. The channel was digitized on full tank level and subdivided into five sections (A-E) in which
graduated buffer zones of 10m, 20m and 30m which corresponding to Nigerian planning setback requirements-
were generated. Spatial overlay analysis was used to measure encroachment extent and density along the river
corridor, while building vulnerability was classified using distance-based proximity and summarized through a
Vulnerability Index (VI, a weighted index of proportional exposure to flood risk). Spatial autocorrelation was
used to determine patterns of clustering on a segment basis. Findings indicate a large encroachment of 3,065
buildings in the 30m buffer, of which 716 were in the most vulnerable 0-10m area. The VI values were 1.73-
1.90 which showed moderate to high flood risk, and central urban segments were most vulnerable.
The spatial analysis revealed mostly negative autocorrelation indicating fragmented and not clustered
vulnerability likely reflecting incoherent informal encroachment. Comparative analysis of distance-based
vulnerability and building density showed complementary data, whereby single-proxy measures could be a poor
fitting characterization of risk. The results indicate that the river could have been less effective in flood
attenuation capacity due to weak setback enforcement which was worsened by the excessive solid waste disposal
which diminished the conveyance of the channels. The management suggestions are based on spatially oriented
intervention: phased relocation of highest-risk structures in central segments, prohibition of the emergence of
new communities, clearing of channels and waste management plans, and institutional reinforcement. Preventive
management is essential in peripheral segments and expansion needs to be stopped before weakness is
diminished.
Keywords: Urban flooding, Riparian buffer zones, Setback violation, Flood vulnerability, Spatial analysis, River
Ngadda
INTRODUCTION
Urban flooding is one of the most central environmental issues in the sub-Saharan African region due to the
significant growth in the frequency of flood disasters in the past several decades (Manandhar et al., 2023;
Nkwunonwo et al., 2016). It is estimated that urban centers in the area will increase three times by 2050, which
will only increase the burden on the environment and flood risks (UN-Habitat, 2020; Guneralp et al., 2017).
Nigeria, the most populous country in Africa, has experienced devastating floods that have claimed thousands
of lives, displaced thousands of people, and destroyed billions of nairas of infrastructure (Umar & Gray, 2023).
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 62
www.rsisinternational.org
Maiduguri becomes one of the most flood-prone cities in northeastern Nigeria to floods, where the River Ngadda
serves as the main city drainage channel (Uba, 2024; Obroh & Sambo, 2022).
River Ngadda, a tributary of the Lake Chad Basin, traverses the middle of Maiduguri and has traditionally been
a source of important ecosystem services, such as supplying water, flood management, groundwater
replenishment, and nutrient cycling (Sanyaolu, et al., 2025). However, processes of systematic intrusion of its
riparian buffer zones have been taken to a higher level by the fast process of urbanization, a lack of institutional
capacity to plan spatial issues, poverty, limited housing opportunities and mass displacement due to the Boko
Haram insurgency since 2009 (Shettima et al., 2025; Balogun et al., 2020; Nkwocha et al., 2020). These forces
have led to a rise in more severe cases of flooding events, with the most recent and worst-case scenario still
occurring in September 2024 after the Alau Dam collapse caused at least 37 deaths and displaced more than
400,000 people (International Organization for Migration, 2024; NEMA, 2024), an impact that was further
exacerbated by extensive riparian buffer encroachment and reduced channel conveyance along River Ngadda.
Riparian buffer zones (setbacks) have various environmental and hydrological roles, which are important to
flood control: (a) storage of temporary floodwater; (b) attenuation of surface runoff; (c) filtration of sediment,
and (d) conservation of aquatic life (Graziano et al., 2022; Majumdar and Avishek, 2025). The typical effective
buffer widths in the world are 30 to 100 m in accordance with the order of streams, slope, and protection goals
(Graziano et al., 2022; Stoffyn-Egli and Duinker, 2013; Sweeney and Newbold, 2014). Buffer width
recommendations are generally narrower in African contexts, with South Africa suggesting 32 m in non-
perennial rivers, and 100 m in perennial rivers (DWAF, 2005), whereas Ghana suggests 10 to 90 m depending
on the order of the streams, the slope, and the danger of pollution (Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources,
2013).
Nigeria has statutory riparian setbacks of between 10 and 60 m across states but there is lack of enforcement.
Floods through empirical GIS studies of Abuja, Ilorin, Oyo, Ile-Ife, and Lagos continuously exhibit that buildings
located within 30m of river channels are the most vulnerable to floods (Odedare et al., 2017; Adigun et al., 2017;
Olajuyigbe et al., 2012; Oriola and Bolaji, 2012). Although the available literature has defined general trends of
flood prone areas in Nigerian urban settings, it has not applied a structured model in the quantification of graded
breach of riparian buffer at the scale of the individual structure in addition to not having interrogated whether
flood exposure along riverine platforms is spatially clustered or dispersed- knowledge gaps that this study intends
to fill along the River Ngadda. Further, there is no research study that specifically evaluated the riparian corridor
of River Ngadda, even though Maiduguri was affected by catastrophic flooding on a frequent basis. This paper
utilizes graduated buffer of 10 m, 20 m, and 30 m to determine the level of encroachment and vulnerability of
the river to flood along River Ngadda. This range represents: (1) the minimum statutory setback of 10m by the
Nigerian Federal Water Resources Act and the minimum statutory riparian setback of about 10 to 16m in
Maiduguri (Borno State Geographic Information System) in forming the inner buffer limit; (2) empirical studies
of Nigerian cities showing that most flood damage is within 30m of the channel in wet seasons (Komolafe et al.,
2015).
The relationships between fast urbanization, riparian encroachment, and exposure to urban flooding are theorized
on the basis of the Human-Environment Interaction Model (Figure 1). This model outlines the role of
anthropogenic influences including. population increase, expansion of the informal settlements and poor
governance as the triggers of environmental disturbances which included the erosion of the buffer zones and
blockage of channels increasing the likelihood of floods. This paper operationalizes these relationships by: (1)
measuring the encroachment of buffer zones in terms of the number of buildings in the graduated setback; (2)
measuring vulnerability of buildings in terms of distance indices; and (3) analyzing spatial patterns in terms of
autocorrelation in order to understand whether encroachment is due to coordinated development or haphazard,
opportunistic expansion. As part of urban resilience models, the ability of cities to absorb, adapt, and recuperate
following flood shocks is critically determined by the integrity of riparian corridors as natural infrastructure
(UN‑Habitat, 2020). The current paper states that the governance of floods in Maiduguri can be characterized
by a compliance gap, which is promoted in the literature concerning risk governance, despite the existence of
statutory setback mechanisms, the institutional means of their enforcement is lacking (Majumdar and Avishek,
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 63
www.rsisinternational.org
2025). It is thus necessary to Embed riparian management within the overall urban resilience measures such as
community-based monitoring and adapting land-use governance to generate a bridge linkage between this gap
and alleviating exposure to buildings to flood risks on the River Ngadda. The study aims to: (1) to quantify the
degree of building encroachment within 10m 20m and 30m riparian buffers along River Ngadda; (2) to compute
segment-specific Vulnerability Indices that can forecast high-risk areas; (3) to examine the patterns of
vulnerability spatial distribution with the aim to inform specific policy interventions.
Figure.1 Human–Environment Interaction Model for Flood Risk
Study Area and Methodology
Study Area
Maiduguri is situated between 11°42′00″N and 12°00′00″N, and 12°54′00″E and 13°20′00″E, the area of which
is about 648 km2 (Figure. 2). The city is located in the semi-arid Sahelian region of northeastern Nigeria and has
unimodal rainfall regime, where the rainy season is usually between June and September and highest in August.
During wet years rain can start as early as in April and last until to October. The average annual temperatures
are between 30°C and 40°C with temperatures in the dry-season hitting up to 42°C, and Harmattan temperatures
can drop down to about 15°C. The major urban drainage system that drains Maiduguri is River Ngadda and its
tributary River Ngaddabul (Shettima et al 2025), which comprises the greatest urban drainage system throughout
the city. River Ngadda is the river that is significant in stormwater transportation and flood management. This
research paper concentrated on River Ngadda, which is the major flood-prone channel in Maiduguri.
River Segmentation
To capture spatial variation on encroachment and flood exposure by the buffer zone, River Ngadda was further
broken down into 5 segments (A- E) using physical features especially major bridges (Figures. 2 and 3). The
segments was defined in the following ways:
Segment A: Behind Water Treatment Plant (WTP) to Fori Bridge
Segment B: Fori Bridge to Lagos Street Bridge
Segment C: Lagos Street Bridge to Gwange Bridge
Segment D: Gwange Bridge to Custom Bridge
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 64
www.rsisinternational.org
Segment E: Custom Bridge to Moromoro Bridge
This segmentation allowed to assess the vulnerability of the river to encroachment by building portions and
buffer zones on a segment-by-segment basis.
Figure. 2: Study Area Map
Figure 3: Satellite Imagery of the Study Area
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 65
www.rsisinternational.org
Data Sources and Processing
The data of this study was based on the data of two major sources (Table 1). Data on building footprints were
acquired by the Microsoft Global Building footprints dataset which offers polygon representations of building
outlines, as the result of machine-learning categorization of high-resolution satellite images. High spatial
coverage, vector format, and a consistent geometry characterize the dataset, and render it appropriate to the
spatial analysis of urban scale. However, past research has demonstrated that these automatically generated
datasets can fail to capture emerging trends or informal networks of various cities that are growing at rapid rates
(Braun, et al., 2023).
In order to overcome these constraints, the dataset was validated and revised by GeoEye-1 satellite imagery
having a spatial resolution of 3.96 cm (Fig. 3). GeoEye imagery has enough spatial resolution to discover discrete
buildings, roof profiles and new developments and is suitable to be manually digitized and refine accurateness
in data-averse urban settings. Visual comparison of the GeoEye imagery showed that 287 structures had been
removed, 143 polygons had been misdigitized, and 89 of the structures were obsolete; the anomalies were later
corrected by manually digitizing in ArcGIS 10.8.2. About 17 per cent of the total layer of buildings required
modification, mainly in informal settlements which were tightly packed together along Segments C and D. A
positional-accuracy test with 50 ground control locations had a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 1.2m, which
is well within acceptable limits of building-scale analysis of flood vulnerability.Figure 4. depicts the
Methodological workflow.
Table 1: Summary of Datasets and Data Sources
Dataset
Source
Spatial
Resolution
Link
Building Footprints
(Initial)
Microsoft Global ML Building
Footprints
Vector
https://github.com/microsoft/Global
MLBuildingFootprints
High-Resolution
Satellite Imagery
GeoEye-1
3.96 cm
https://earth.esa.int/eogateway/missi
ons/geoeye-1
Administrative
Boundaries
FAO(Global Administrative
Unit Layers) Dataset
Vector
http://www.fao.org/geonetwork/srv/e
n/main.home
Figure 4. Methodological workflow
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 66
www.rsisinternational.org
River Digitization
The high-resolution imagery was used to perform a manual digitization of River Ngadda in ArcGIS 10.8.2. The
digitization was performed at Full Tank Level (FTL) of the river, which is the farthest point along the river at
high water levels. FTL was determined based on visual analysis of channel morphological indicators such as:
(1) vegetation transition zones which indicate the upper limit of regular inundation, (2) alteration in soil moisture
pattern that could be observed in the imagery, (3) channel bank profiles and (4) high-water marks and sediment
deposits that could be seen. Even though the data of continuous hydrological gauges were not provided, this
method is equivalent to the existing knowledge on floodplain delineation in data-sparse settings (Flannery et al.,
2017; Wu et al., 2012; Bradbrook et al., 2004). While this visual interpretation method is appropriate for data-
scarce contexts, it introduces some uncertainty in precise FTL delineation, particularly in heavily built-up
Data Analysis
Buffer Zone Delineation
In order to determine the amount of encroachment and flood exposure in the buffer zone, three concentric buffer
areas (10, 30 ,20 m) were created using the Buffer tool of ArcGIS 10.8.2 based on the digitised riverbank at FTL.
The choice of buffer distances was based on the criteria provided in the Introduction which represents the
requirements of Borno State Geographic Information System (BOGIS) minimum setback requirements (10-
16m), empirical flood thresholds based on Nigerian studies (Odedare et al., 2017; Olajuyigbe et al., 2012) and
the hydrological behaviour of River Ngadda during extreme events e.g. the 2024 Alau Dam failure.
Spatial Overlay and Building Counts
Footprints were superimposed on all buffers zones using the Select by Location and Intersect tools of ArcGIS.
The total of all buildings intersecting the buffer was calculated using the summary statistics on the field of
buildings, the Count function of the Summary Statistics tool was used to count the number of buildings
intersecting the buffer distance and river segment as:
Total buildings in 10 m buffer =

Total buildings in 20 m buffer =

Total buildings in 30 m buffer =

Building Vulnerability Classification
The creation of vulnerability to flooding was categorized into three groups based on the distance to the river
channel, which was used as a proxy to flood exposure intensity. According to this distance-based method, the
intensity of flood hazard decreases over the distance of the river channel, which is based on the results of a
variety of studies of urban flood risks (Ghosh, et al., 2023; Islam, et al., 2025). A cumulative subtraction
technique ensured mutually exclusive classification across buffer zones, with each building counted once in its
closest buffer zone. Exclusive Building Counts were calculated through equations 1-4 and Building density was
computed as using question 5.
exclusive

(1)
exclusive


(2)
exclusive


(3)

total
exclusive
exclusive
exclusive
(4)

(5)
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 67
www.rsisinternational.org
Where:
exclusive
= Buildings exclusively within 0-10 m buffer
exclusive
= Buildings exclusively within 10-20 m zone (within 20 m buffer but outside 10 m buffer)
exclusive
= Buildings exclusively within 20-30 m zone (within 30 m buffer but outside 20 m buffer)
building density for segment i (buildings per square meter, buildings/m²)
number of buildings within the buffer zone of segment i
area of the buffer zone for segment i (m²)
The highly vulnerable buildings were all those found within the 10-meter buffer zone (0≤d<10 m). Moderately
vulnerable were the buildings in the range of 10-20 meters (10≤d<20 m). The buildings falling within the range
of 20-30 meters (20≤ d < 30 m) were identified as low vulnerability. The proximity classification is not aimed
at the actual prediction of flood destruction but simply gives a summary of relative exposure to floods. Even
though the vulnerability may be moderated by the ancillary variables like elevation or construction materials,
distance to the river remains a robust first-order proxy in urban areas where data are scarce (Komolafe et al.,
2015).
The Vulnerability Index (VI) for each segment was calculated using equation 6

󰇛

󰇜󰇛

󰇜󰇛


󰇜
total
(6)
Where:
= Vulnerability Index for segment

= Number of highly vulnerable buildings

= Number of moderately vulnerable buildings

= Number of low vulnerability buildings
total
= Total buildings in all buffer zones for segment
Weight factors: 3 (high), 2 (moderate), 1 (low)
The Vulnerability Index (VI) has a range of 1.0 (corresponding to a situation where all buildings are in a low-
vulnerability region) to 3.0 (corresponding to a situation where all buildings are in a high-vulnerability region),
and provides a quantitative approximation of how the concentration of flood risk is concentrated in few river
segments. The weighting system which has been adopted in this paper, that is, the ratio 3:2:1, is heuristic in
nature and assumes the intensity of flood-hazards to decrease linearly with the spatial distance. Only slight
differences in the relative ranking of the segments were obtained after a sensitivity analysis using different
weighting (4:2:1) and weighting combinations (3:1.5:1) and this indicates that the outcome obtained is robust to
a moderate variation in the weighting parameters.
Spatial Autocorrelation Analysis
To examine the spatial pattern of flood vulnerability along River Ngadda, spatial autocorrelation analysis
determined whether vulnerable buildings are randomly distributed or spatially dependent. Building footprints
were converted to centroid points with vulnerability scores depending on the distance to buffers (3, 2 and 1,
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 68
www.rsisinternational.org
respectively: 0-10m, 10-20m and 20-30m). The performance of Spatial Autocorrelation (Global Moran I) was
done in ArcGIS 10.8.2 with the help of an inverse-distance spatial weights matrix. The inverse-distance
weighting scheme was chosen due to the fact that it is suitable in terms of the hypothesis according to which
spatially close buildings are more likely to have similar levels of vulnerability since they have similar
environmental background and development trends. A threshold of conceptualization distance of 100m was used,
as it was proposed by the average size of informal settlements localities in Maiduguri. The Moran's I values
ranges between +1 and -1, which implies that the spatial dispersion, randomness, or concentration of the levels
of vulnerability is present, which in turn enhances the spatial flood risk assessment.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Spatial Distribution of Riparian Buffer Encroachment Along River Ngadda
Spatial analysis revealed that there is massive encroachment into the riparian buffer zones in all the five segments
of the river (Figures 5-10, Table 2). Across all segments, 716 building were found within 10m buffer, 1,904
building within 20m buffer and 3,065 building within 30m buffer. Segment C exhibited the highest
encroachment at any distance of the buffers, with 330 buildings at 10m distance, 881 at 20m distance and 1,433
at 30m distance. Segment B and D had heavy encroachment as well with Segment B having 132, 342, and 524
structures in 10m, 20m, and 30m buffers, respectively and Segment D having 151, 413, 653 structures
respectively. Segment A and E were in the lower encroachment levels with the 29 and 74 buildings respectively
in their 10m buffer environments but the fact that there are 143 and 312 buildings in their 30m buffer
environment is testimony to continued development pressure in these marginal areas. Normalized to the buffer
area, the patterns of building density indicated that there was spatial variation between the segments (Table 2).
Segment E had the greatest density (0.001241 buildings/m
2
) in the 10m buffer, then Segment C (0.000879
buildings/m
2
) and Segment D (0.000835 buildings/m
2
). This density trend was also observed through the 20m
and 30m buffers, as Segments E, C and D all exhibited the highest proportion of structures per square meter of
available riparian corridor area.
Table 2: Spatial Distribution Segment-wise Buffer Zone Area, Building Counts, and Density across 10m, 20m,
and 30m Buffer Distances
Buffer 10m
Segment
Building Count
Density (buildings/m²)
Rank by Density
A
29
0.00004189
5
B
132
0.00042
4
C
330
0.000879
2
D
151
0.000835
3
E
74
0.001241
1
Total
716
0.000441
-
Buffer 20m
Segment
Building Count
Density (buildings/m²)
Rank by Density
A
47
0.00006282
5
B
210
0.000569
4
C
551
0.001225
2
D
262
0.001178
3
E
118
0.001551
1
Total
1,188
0.000637
-
Buffer 30m
Segment
Building Count
Density (buildings/m²)
Rank by Density
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 69
www.rsisinternational.org
A
143
0.000178
5
B
182
0.00043
4
C
552
0.001054
2
D
240
0.00091
3
E
120
0.001293
1
Total
1,237
0.000587
-
Note: Density is reported as buildings per square meter (buildings/m²) for comparability across segments with
differing buffer areas.
Figure. 5. Buildings encroachment within (a) 10 m, (b) 20 m, and (c) 30 m river buffer zones along
Segment A
Figure. 6. Buildings encroachment within (a) 10 m, (b) 20 m, and (c) 30 m river buffer zones along
Segment B
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 70
www.rsisinternational.org
Figure. 7. Buildings encroachment within (a) 10 m, (b) 20 m, and (c) 30 m river buffer zones along
Segment C
Figure 8. Buildings encroachment within (a) 10 m, (b) 20 m, and (c) 30 m river buffer zones along
Segment D
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 71
www.rsisinternational.org
Figure 9. Buildings encroachment within (a) 10 m, (b) 20 m, and (c) 30 m river buffer zones along
Segment E
Building Vulnerability Classification and Segment Vulnerability Index
Building vulnerability classification demonstrated that there was a high level of spatial variation in the
concentration of flood risk across River Ngadda (Table 3). Across all segments, 716 buildings were classified as
highly vulnerable (0-10m), 1,188 as moderately vulnerable (10-20m), and 1,161 as low vulnerability (20-30m),
with a calculated VI value ranging between 1.73 and 1.90 and an average of 1.85. Segment B was the most
vulnerable (VI = 1.90), then there were Segments D (1.86), E (1.85), C (1.84) and A (1.73).
The distribution of buildings in terms of vulnerability (716:1,188:1,161) show that there are fairly balanced
encroachment quantities throughout the entire 30m wide corridor instead of a concentration in the safer outer
zones.
Table 3: Building Vulnerability Classification and Segment Vulnerability Index
Segm
ent
Highly Vulnerable
(0-10m)
Moderately Vulnerable
(10-20m)
Low Vulnerable
(20-30m)
Total
Buildings
Vulnerability
Index (VI)
A
29
47
67
143
1.73
B
132
210
182
524
1.9
C
330
551
552
1,433
1.84
D
151
262
240
653
1.86
E
74
118
120
312
1.85
Total
716
1,188
1,161
3,065
1.85
Note: Vulnerability Index (VI) calculated using Equation 6
󰇛

󰇜󰇛

󰇜󰇛


󰇜
total
, where VI ranges
from 1.0 (lowest risk) to 3.0 (highest risk).
Spatial Autocorrelation Analysis
Segment-wise Global Moran's I analysis revealed predominantly negative spatial autocorrelation across most
segments (Table 4, Figures 10a-e), indicating a dispersed and not clustered pattern of vulnerability. Segment A
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 72
www.rsisinternational.org
had low dispersion (Moran I = -0.0706, Z -score = -1.553, p = 0.12) which was not statistically significant,
implying almost a random distribution of vulnerability. Segments B through E all demonstrated statistically
significant negative autocorrelation. Segment D had the most significant dispersion (Moran I = -0.1524, Z-
score = -12.110, p < 0.001), then followed by Segment B (Moran I = -0.1017, Z-score = -11.922, p < 0.001),
Segment C (Moran I = -0.0778, Z-score = -7.850, p < 0.001), and then Segment E (Moran's I = -0.0594, Z-
score = -2.648, p = 0.008).
Table 4: Segment-wise Spatial Autocorrelation (Moran’s I) of Building Flood Vulnerability
River
Segments
Moran’s
I
Expected
I
Varianc
e
Z-
score
p-
value
Spatial Pattern
Significance
A
-0.0706
-0.0040
0.00184
-1.553
0.12
Weak dispersion
Not
significant
B
-0.1017
-0.0008
0.00007
-
11.922
<0.001
Strong dispersion
Significant
C
-0.0778
-0.0004
0.0001
-7.850
<0.001
Moderate dispersion
Significant
D
-0.1524
-0.0007
0.00016
-
12.110
<0.001
Very strong
dispersion
Significant
E
-0.0594
-0.0017
0.00047
-2.648
0.008
Moderate dispersion
Significant
Note: Expected I values differ across segments because Moran’s I was computed separately for each segment
using segment-specific feature counts (n), where Expected I = −1/(n−1).
Figure. 10: Segment-wise Spatial Autocorrelation (Moran I) Report: Segments (a)-(e)
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 73
www.rsisinternational.org
DISCUSSION
The high extent of encroachment recorded along River Ngadda is an indication of massive breach of riparian
setback laws, which are in accord with the findings recorded in other towns within Nigeria (Bakare et al., 2019;
Odedare et al., 2017; Olajuyigbe et al., 2012). High rates of urbanization with a low level of enforcement have
promoted the growth of building into the riparian land, which is probable to increase flood risk. The proximity
to the channel increases the likelihood of the structure to be impacted, including inundation, high-velocity flows,
and bank erosion, and the study proved that close buildings sustain disproportionately greater damages due to
permanent causes (Mansouri et al., 2025; Choorapulakkal et al., 2024; Malgwi et al., 2021). This continuous rise
in the number of buildings as the buffer distances increase argues in favor of continual erosion that reduces the
ability of the river to deal with its floods in a natural way.
The average of the values of Vulnerability Index (VI) (1.73-1.90; mean 1.85) shows moderate-high exposure
along the corridor, and the distribution of the buildings is even within the 30 m buffer as opposed to safer exterior
areas-a trend in other encroached systems (Manna et al., 2025; Komolafe et al., 2015). Comparisons of VI-
density indicate complementarities. The high VI (1.90) of segment B even though it is moderately dense is a
bank concentration indicator. Segment E has a high density, which provides lower VI (1.85) with even
distribution. Both are compounding risks of segment C. The VI therefore represents a relative exposure measure
rather than a deterministic predictor, as it excludes elevation, construction materials, drainage capacity, and flood
depth — variables that future multi-parameter frameworks should incorporate.
Field observations also found out that patterns of waste and drainage obstruction also gives more context to
vulnerability on top of distance and density measures. Segments C, D, and E showed a high level of solid waste
dumping on the channel (Figures 5-9), which is reflected in their higher VI values (1.84-1.86) and can assert that
the increased risk of flooding in these segments can be multiplied by the decreased capacity of the channel
(Komolafe et al., 2015; Mokuolu et al., 2022; Echendu, 2023). Conversely, Segment A, which had comparatively
more buildings near the channel, had comparatively little waste and the lowest VI (1.73) which implies that
channel maintenance conditions might cause distance-based exposure to moderate.
The essentially negative Moran’s I values (considerable variation in Segments B-E) are not in line with the
normal patterns of clustering observed in flood-prone urban rivers and reflects fragmented, and not concentrated,
vulnerability. This dispersion could be explained in a number of ways. To start with, uncoordinated informal
urbanization with individualized land use, housing shortage, and lax enforcement of these conditions can be the
baseline of dispersion, which fits the dynamics of post-displacement in Maiduguri (Nkwocha et al., 2020).
Second, variable land tenure regimes can result in unequal enforcement topography leading to dispersed and not
clustered encroachment. Third, historic infrastructure such as bridges might have impacted settlement patterns
in unequal measures, forming scattered and not continuous vulnerable areas. Fourth, topographic differences in
floodplain can form areas of high or low land that can influence a location decision without regard to the distance
of the channel. Although the former seems to be the most appropriate in the context of local conditions, the
existing data cannot make a certain distinction between these options. The insignificant outcome in Segment A
could be due to reduced development pressure in the urban fringe close to the infrastructure facilities.
From an enforcement standpoint, the scattered nature of the encroachment as indicated by negative Moran's I
values poses a very different challenge than the clustered violations. Clustered encroachment enables the
authorities to act upon adjacent areas in concert, whereas dispersed encroachment, as in this case, requires them
to intervene at parcel scales, not at area scales. This has practical consequences on resource allocation -
enforcement agencies in Maiduguri should focus on mobile and responsive systems and not fixed-zone policing,
and community land committees might be granted the power to report isolated violations in real-time. This
observation further supports the importance of segment specific strategies presented in the Policy Implications
section, as homogenous implementation mechanism would ill-fit the spatial fragmentation of encroachment
measures recorded on River Ngadda.
Segments B, C, and D all record high VI values (1.84–1.90) but differ markedly in the character and mechanisms
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 74
www.rsisinternational.org
of their vulnerability. The area with the most absolute buildings (1,433 within 30m including 330 in the high-
risk 0-10m area), is segment C, traversing the commercial core of Maiduguri, although it is densely developed
with residential and commercial activities, the distribution in the buffer zones is relatively balanced (VI = 1.84).
Conversely, Segment B, which contains fewer total buildings (524 within 30m) has the highest VI (1.90) because,
although only 25.2% of its total buildings fall within the 0–10m zone, this represents the highest proportional
concentration of any segment at that distance (62.4% relative share; Table 3). Segment D has a high number of
buildings (653 in 30m) as well as the most intense spatial dispersion (Moran’s I = -0.1524), indicating a
qualitatively different settlement pattern of mixed older established settlements and new informal development
around Custom Bridge. The differences between central segments reflect that central vulnerability to segments
C, B and D is associated with density-related pressure, proximity-related exposure, and fragmented incremental
growth, respectively. Segments A and E, which are peripheral, have alarming expansion rates of 143 and 312
buildings in the 30m buffers. The most vulnerable areas are always the central areas with the greatest density of
bridges, the closest to the market, and the longest histories of settlement, meaning that the flood risk is a
phenomenon of complex interactions among developmental processes, land economies, and infrastructure
location instead of the even distribution.
Limitations
A number of constraints should be mentioned. Footprint data that is built up might still have residual errors
notwithstanding the attempt to validate it. Although field observations provided qualitative evaluation of waste
deposition and drainage states in various segments, no systematic quantitative measures of blockage density,
blockage position, or infrastructure state were provided in this study, which did not allow conducting a more
rigorous sensitivity analysis of these variables. The temporal differences between floods (2012, 2018, 2024) and
imagery (2023-2024) hinder direct effects of the past to the present. FTL interpretation creates subjectivity in
vegetated reaches or modified reaches. The VI weighting scheme presupposes proportional reduction of the
hazard at a distance which is not necessarily uniform. This is because sensitivity of Moran’s I to spatial
parameters tends to indicate that other specifications could obtain different variations. Fundamentally, most
essentially, vulnerability estimates show likely relative exposure and not essentially quantified threat because of
lack of hydraulic modeling. The proposed research method needs to be combined with hydrodynamic modeling,
Digital Elevation Models, multi-temporal analysis, and socio-economic indicators in the future to enhance
evidence and allow quantifying the risk.
Policy Implications
The results indicate that there is an immediate need to have spatially focused management instead of standard
policies. Segments B, C and D are highly vulnerable and they need gradual relocation or retrofitting, the setback
must be strictly implemented and the waste management courses, and only community-based monitoring can be
used to supplement the official supervision. The preventive enforcement of the A and E peripheral segments is
necessary prior to the reestablishment of the conditions in the central. The local attributes need to be analyzed
within the framework of segment-specific strategies: waste management of the market-area and settlement-
upgrading in Segment C, alternative water access to commercial activity in the Segment B, tenure-based
differentiation in Segment D. It is necessary to be implemented through institutional strengthening such as land
tenure clarification, inter-agency coordination, development of capacity to enforce and participate in planning
in a particular segment.
CONCLUSION
This paper shows the riparian invasion in the Ngadda River is pronounced, with 3,065 structures located within
the 30m riparian zone, of which 716 were in the highest-risk 0–10m buffer, 1,188 in the 10–20m buffer, and
1,161 in the 20–30m buffer, with moderate-to-high Vulnerability Indices ranging from 1.73 to 1.90, indicating
widespread and graded setback violations. The distribution of these encroachment and vulnerability patterns is
mainly centralized within section B, C, and D of the central segments with scattered distribution pattern as
indicated by a negative value of Moran; I (see Table 4). Although distance and density-based measurements are
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 75
www.rsisinternational.org
useful in giving complementary data on spatial information, they are made indeterminate by uncertainties on
hydraulic modelling forecasts. Based on this, urban resilience in Maiduguri is proposed to be strengthened by
conducting urban strategic interventions, including staged relocation and implementation in segments B to D,
preventive interventions in segments A and E, systematic waste clearing, as well as institutional reforms.
REFERENCE
1. Adigun, I. A., Ibe, P. O., & Akolo, F. O. (2017). Appraisal of Abuja master plan using GIS: A case study
of Abuja Phase I, Federal Capital Territory, Nigeria. World Scientific News, 77(2), 144–162.
2. Amusa, I. A., Ibe, P. O., & Akolo, F. O. (2017). Appraisal of Abuja master plan using GIS: A case study
of Abuja Phase I, Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria. World Scientific News, 77(2), 144–162.
3. Bakare, G. O., Omosulu, S. B., & Famutimi, J. T. (2019). Geo-mapping of areas vulnerable to Ala-River
Basin flood disaster risk in Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria. Preprints.
https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201911.0184.v1
4. Bradbrook, K. F., Lane, S. N., Waller, S. G., & Bates, P. D. (2004). Two dimensional diffusion wave
modelling of flood inundation using a simplified channel representation. International Journal of River
Basin Management, 2(3), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2004.9635233
5. Braun, A., Warth, G., Bachofer, F., Schultz, M., & Hochschild, V. (2023). Mapping Urban Structure Types
Based on Remote Sensing Data—A Universal and Adaptable Framework for Spatial Analyses of Cities.
Land, 12(10), 1885. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12101885
6. Choorapulakkal, A. A., Madandola, M. G., Al-Kandari, A., Furlan, R., Bayram, G., & Mohamed, H. A.
A. (2024). The Resilience of the Built Environment to Flooding: The Case of Alappuzha District in the
South Indian State of Kerala. Sustainability, 16(12), 5142. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16125142
7. DWAF (Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, South Africa). (2005). A practical field procedure for
identification and delineation of wetlands and riparian areas. Department of Water Affairs and Forestry,
Pretoria, South Africa. https://www.dws.gov.za/Documents/Legislature/nw_act/NWA.pdf
8. Echendu, A. J. (2023). Flooding and Waste Disposal Practices of Urban Residents in Nigeria.
GeoHazards, 4(4), 350-366. https://doi.org/10.3390/geohazards4040020
9. FGN (Federal Government of Nigeria). (1993). Water Resources Act, Cap W2, Laws of the Federation
of Nigeria. Federal Ministry of Water Resources, Abuja, Nigeria
10. Fischer, R. A., & Fischenich, J. C. (2000). Design recommendations for riparian corridors and vegetated
buffer strips (No. ERDCTNEMRRPSR24). https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA378426.pdf
11. Flannery, J., Stubblefield, A., Fiori, R., & Shea, C. (2017). Observations of channel change from
constructed wood jams on a forested gravel‐bed stream. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society,
146(1), 181-193.
12. Ghosh, A., Chatterjee, U., Pal, S. C., Towfiqul Islam, A. R. Md., Alam, E., & Islam, M. K. (2023). Flood
hazard mapping using GIS-based statistical model in vulnerable riparian regions of sub-tropical
environment. Geocarto International, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2023.2285355
13. Balogun, A. D., Salleh, M. A. Bin, & Ahmad, A. A. (2020). The Effects of Boko Haram Insurgency on
The Internally Displaced Children in Nigeria. International Journal of Academic Research in Business
and Social Sciences, 10(2), 795–822.
http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i2/7010
14. Graziano, M. P., Deguire, A. K., & Surasinghe, T. D. (2022). Riparian Buffers as a Critical Landscape
Feature: Insights for Riverscape Conservation and Policy Renovations. Diversity, 14(3), 172.
https://doi.org/10.3390/d14030172
15. Güneralp, B., Lwasa, S., Masundire, H., Parnell, S., & Seto, K. C. (2017). Urbanization in Africa:
challenges and opportunities for conservation. Environmental research letters, 13(1), 015002. DOI
10.1088/1748-9326/aa94fe
16. International Organization for Migration. (2024). Nigeria flood situation report Borno State (13
September 2024) (Update 1). Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM).
https://nigeria.iom.int/sites/g/files/tmzbdl1506/files/documents/reports/Borno_Flood_Situation_Report
_13_September_2024_final_0.pdf**
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 76
www.rsisinternational.org
17. Islam, T., Zeleke, E. B., Afroz, M., & Melesse, A. M. (2025). A Systematic Review of Urban Flood
Susceptibility Mapping: Remote Sensing, Machine Learning, and Other Modeling Approaches. Remote
Sensing, 17(3), 524.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17030524
18. Komolafe, A. A., Adegboyega, S. A. & Akinluyi, F. O. (2015). A Review of Flood Risk Analysis in
Nigeria. American Journal of Environmental Sciences, 11(3), 157-166.
https://doi.org/10.3844/ajessp.2015.157.166
19. Majumdar, A. & Avishek, K. (2025). Mitigating riparian buffer zone degradation through policy
interventions and learnings from best practices. Discov Environ 3, 84 https://doi.org/10.1007/s44274-
025-00288-6
20. Malgwi, M. B., Schlögl, M., & Keiler, M. (2021). Expert-based versus data-driven flood damage models:
A comparative evaluation for data-scarce regions. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 57,
102148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102148
21. Manandhar, B., Cui, S., Wang, L., & Shrestha, S. (2023). Urban Flood Hazard Assessment and
Management Practices in South Asia: A Review. Land, 12(3), 627.
https://doi.org/10.3390/land12030627
22. Manna, H., Das, M., Pramanik, M., Sarkar, S., Mahato, S., Talukdar, S. & Zhran, M. (2025). Ensemble
intelligence for urban resilience: flood susceptibility modeling in Mumbai using advanced machine
learning. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 16(1) 2588718.
https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2025.2588718
23. Mansouri, S., Noroozinejad Farsangi, E., Siahpolo, N., Moghadam, A. S., Pour, A. K., & Noori, M.
(2025). Effects of River Shapes on Structural Damages to Buildings in Flood-Prone Regions. Journal of
Structural Design and Construction Practice, 30(3), 05025005.
https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDCCC.SCENG-1717
24. Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources. (2013). Riparian Buffer Zone Policy for Managing Freshwater
Bodies in Ghana. Government of Ghana. https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/gha149365.pdf
25. Mokuolu, O. A., Odunaike, A. K., Iji, J. O., & Aremu, A. S. (2022). Assessing the effects of solid wastes
on urban flooding: A case study of Isale Koko. LAUTECH Journal of Civil and Environmental Studies,
9(1), 22–30.
https://doi.org/10.36108/laujoces/2202.90.0130
26. NEMA (National Emergency Management Agency). (2024). Flood situation report: Borno State,
September 2024. National Emergency Management Agency, Abuja, Nigeria.
27. Nkwocha, K. F., Iheukwumere, S. O., Shettima, M. K., & Audu, A. (2020). An autopsy of housing
challenges in urban Maiduguri. Open Access Journal of Waste Management & Xenobiotics, 3(4).1-7
https://doi.org/10.23880/oajwx-16000149
28. Nkwunonwo, U. C., Whitworth, M., & Baily, B.:( 2016) Review article: A review and critical analysis of
the efforts towards urban flood risk management in the Lagos region of Nigeria, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst.
Sci., 16 (2) 349–369, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-349-2016
29. Obroh, O. G., & Sambo, G. (2022). Flood vulnerability mapping of River Ngadda using geospatial and
remote sensing techniques in Maiduguri Metropolis, Borno State. Journal of Global Ecology and
Environment, 14(4), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.56557/JOGEE/2022/v14i47453
30. Odedare, K. O., Amusa, I. A., Aweda, T. O., & Gbiri, I. A. (2017). Vulnerability assessment of structures
along river channels in Oyo metropolis, Nigeria. World Scientific News, 83, 130–149.
31. Olajuyigbe, A. E., Rotowa, O. O., & Durojaye, E. (2012). An assessment of flood hazard in Nigeria: The
case of Mile 12, Lagos. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 367–375.
https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2012.v3n2.367
32. Oriola, E., & Bolaji, S. (2012). Urban flood risk information on a river catchment in a part of Ilorin
Metropolis, Kwara State, Nigeria. Information and Knowledge Management, 2(8), 70–83.
33. Sanyaolu, B. O., Ibrahim, U. A., & Alkali, A. N. (2025). Rainfall and Streamflow Dynamics in the Borno
Region of the Lake Chad Basin: A Hydrological Assessment. Arid Zone Journal Of Engineering,
Technology and Environment, 21(2), 491-498. Retrieved from
https://azojete.com.ng/index.php/azojete/article/view/1070
34. Shettima, M., Hasnat, M., Sambo, G. H., Bukar, A. G., Boyoma, A. M., & Mohammed, M. A. (2025).
Spatio-Temporal Dynamics and Forecasting of Urban Land Use and Land Cover Change in Maiduguri
Using Google Earth Engine and Machine Learning. Arid Zone Journal of Engineering, Technology and
Environment, 21,(3) 783-793.
https://www.azojete.com.ng/index.php/azojete/article/view/1121
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 77
www.rsisinternational.org
35. Stoffyn-Egli, P., & Duinker, P. N. (2013). An ecological approach to riparian-buffer definition, and
implications for timber harvests in Nova Scotia, Canada. Journal of sustainable development, 6(12), 111.
36. Sweeney, B. W., & Newbold, J. D. (2014). Streamside Forest Buffer Width Needed to Protect Stream
Water Quality, Habitat, and Organisms: A Literature Review†. Journal of The American Water Resources
Association, 50(3), 560–584.
https://doi.org/10.1111/JAWR.12203
37. Uba, M. I. (2024). Assessing natural disaster and sustainable infrastructure development: A case study of
flood resilience and mitigation strategies in Maiduguri, Nigeria. International Journal of Advances in
Engineering and Management, 6(10), 244–249.
https://doi.org/10.35629/5252-0610244249
38. Umar, N., & Gray, A. (2023). Flooding in Nigeria: a review of its occurrence and impacts and approaches
to modelling flood data. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 80(3), 540–561.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2022.2081471
39. UN-Habitat. (2020). World Cities Report 2020: The value of sustainable urbanization. United Nations
Human Settlements Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
https://unhabitat.org/World%20Cities%20Report%202020
40. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). (2005). National management measures to
control nonpoint source pollution from urban areas. EPA-841-B-05-004. Office of Water, Washington,
DC.
41. Wu, H., Adler, R. F., Hong, Y., Tian, Y., & Policelli, F. (2012). Evaluation of Global Flood Detection
Using Satellite-Based Rainfall and a Hydrologic Model. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 13(4), 1268-
1284. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-11-087.1