INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 327
www.rsisinternational.org
Green Supply Chain Management Enhances Competitiveness and
Accelerates Economic Growth in Indias Agro-Food Sector
Dr. Ramesh Kumar
Assistant ProfessorDepartment of Economics KDS College, Gogri, Khagaria Munger University,
Munger
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.15020000031
Received: 12 February 2026; Accepted: 19 February 2026; Published: 05 March 2026
ABSTRACT
This study argues that green supply chain management (GSCM) significantly boosts competitiveness and
economic growth in India's agro-food sector. It analyzes how Indian agro-food companies adopt GSCM
practices. As a part of the GSCM approach, eco-friendly packaging, reverse logistics, and energy-efficient
transportation are considered to maintain their product quality. Apart from the GSCM approach, there is the
impact these practices have on the competitiveness and financial performance of the rest of the mode of
production. In this study, quantitative methods and secondary data from government and industry sources are
used. The research demonstrates how these GSCM elements strengthen company performance and contribute to
the agro industry’s sectoral growth. Using descriptive statistics and core hypotheses, the study identifies
prevalent practices in the agro-industry. Through this study, we review relevant policy frameworks, identify the
obstacles in this sector, and recommend strategies for broader GSCM adoption. The investigation further
connects green logistics, sustainable sourcing of agro-green products, and identifies emerging technologies for
operational cost reductions and market expansion. The expected outcome of this study is that technological
advancements, such as hybrid seeds and modern irrigation, will drive higher productivity and economic growth
in Indian agriculture. Practical recommendations are provided to help policymakers, industry leaders, and
academics build effective, sustainable, and competitive green agri-food supply chains in India.
Keywords: Green Supply Chain Management, Economic Growth, Agro-food Industry Sustainability, Eco-
friendly Practices
INTRODUCTION
Green Supply Chain Management (GSCM) is now central to competitiveness and economic value creation across
all sectors of the economy. GSCM integrates environmental priorities directly into product supply chain
processes. Intended for the sale of goods and services, it distinguishes between product origin, operational supply
chain management, and product sustainability throughout the product lifecycle. This connection to core
economic principles: consumption, production, distribution, exchange, and revenue drives both consumption’s
utility and producer profits. Through implementing green practices, GSCM can advance sustainable and
responsible business operations. Economic sustainability shapes both business strategy and market expectations.
GSCM emerges as a fundamental approach that links economic growth to ecological sustainability. This
introduction outlines how applying GSCM across the supply chain creates value and reduces environmental
harm, reinforcing its importance in today's competitive agency environment.
Needs of green supply chain management
Supply chain management is essential for economic development, connecting producers and consumers while
supporting marketing and sales. Efficient systems are critical when the number of producers is less than the
number of consumers, and an effective market is equalized by a distribution system. Product markets are shaped
by product features, production scale, product differentiation, supply chain optimization, and infrastructure, all
of which influence green supply chain management. Efficiency focuses on reducing costs and streamlining
processes, while effectiveness addresses stakeholder interests throughout the product lifecycle. Economic theory
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 328
www.rsisinternational.org
simplifies these dynamics, but real-world complexities require adaptive management to address market changes.
The entry and exit of companies influence market dynamics, affecting prices, production, and distribution. Green
supply chain management leverages new technologies to modernize traditional supply chains. For instance, tools
such as blockchain for tracking, artificial intelligence for demand forecasting, and the Internet of Things (IoT)
for real-time inventory management enhance efficiency and resilience. At the same time, globalization has
increased complexity, requiring companies to navigate international trade regulations and diverse legal
environments. Therefore, businesses must address these challenges while controlling costs, managing risks, and
meeting rising expectations for ethical and sustainable practices.
The circular economy in supply chain management aims to minimize waste, improve resource efficiency, and
promote sustainability through the product lifecycle. This approach replaces linear models and prompts
businesses to revisit production, packaging, and end-of-life processes. Management studies bridge economic
theory and practical challenges to support adaptive, sustainable strategies. As a market mechanism, supply chain
management remains vital for economic development, innovation, and growth. In agro-food, GSCM applies
sustainability at every stage, starting with eco-friendly farming: selecting sustainable seeds, using organic
fertilizers, and implementing integrated pest management to reduce chemical use and support biodiversity. Water
conservation methods, such as drip irrigation and rainwater harvesting, and energy-efficient equipment, enhance
resource efficiency and reduce emissions.
Sustainability initiatives extend to processing plants, where energy-efficient equipment and renewable energy
sources are increasingly used. Moreover, companies are implementing waste treatment to reduce food waste and
reuse byproducts, supporting a circular economy. Packaging is also shifting toward biodegradable or recyclable
materials to minimize plastic waste. Transportation and logistics improvements, such as optimized routes,
efficient vehicles, and alternative fuels, help lower carbon emissions. While sustainable technologies often
require significant upfront investment, they can yield long-term savings. As a result, companies are exploring
financing options like green bonds and sustainability-linked loans. Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic has
heightened consumer interest in food origins and production methods, increasing demand for supply chain
transparency. Consequently, agro-food companies are adopting more eco-friendly practices and enhancing
traceability to meet consumer expectations for sustainability information.
Green supply chain management (GSCM) delivers measurable economic and environmental benefits by
improving resource efficiency, reducing waste, and strengthening brand reputation. Environmental, social, and
governance (ESG) is a business model that prioritizes eco-friendly practices achieve higher efficiency, cost
savings, and stronger customer loyalty, thereby directly enhancing competitiveness. These strategies also reduce
risks from climate change, resource scarcity, and regulatory changes. The Indian agro-food industry's wider
adoption of GSCM is driven by enduring consumer demand and clear long-term financial value. Technologies
such as blockchain, IoT, and artificial intelligence are essential tools that support transparency, real-time
monitoring, and resource optimization. Business sustainability at a large scale requires active partnership among
all supply chain actors. While industry standards, farmer-producer organizations (FPOs), and NGO involvement
indirectly enhance production capacity. This approach accelerates the adoption of consistent best practices,
which directly support India's economic growth. Adopting green supply chain management in the agro-food
industry presents challenges, including high costs, complex technologies, and difficulties in measuring
sustainability outcomes. However, increasing government pressure and consumer demand for eco-friendly
products make these practices essential for long-term success in the agro-food industry. Additionally, the sector
faces negative perceptions of packaged food due to concerns about chemicals and the environmental impact of
packaging, which extend to broader issues such as soil degradation, water pollution, and carbon emissions.
This study provides actionable strategies for producers, emphasizing that effective green supply chain
management (GSCM) is essential for overcoming industry challenges. And responding to consumer priorities,
and supporting rapid sector growth. GSCM focuses on eco-friendly practices across production, processing,
packaging, and distribution, and companies can strengthen competitiveness and meet the rising demand for
sustainable food. While large firms have greater resources to manage green supply chains, small producers need
targeted support due to limited access to technology, funding, and markets, as well as high certification expenses.
Despite these barriers, the fast-growing Indian agro-food industry stands to gain significantly from GSCM,
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 329
www.rsisinternational.org
capturing greater market share and delivering greater value. The industry's path forward hinges on adopting
sustainable production techniques, reducing chemicals, choosing eco-friendly packaging, and implementing a
coordinated green strategy across the supply chain to achieve an enduring competitive edge. Implementing green
supply chain management offers benefits such as reduced environmental impact, improved resource efficiency,
higher product quality, and increased customer trust. Organic farming, for example, prevents soil and water
damage while producing healthier food. Innovative packaging made from renewable materials or that uses less
plastic attracts eco-conscious consumers and benefits the environment. Sustainable strategies can open new
markets, particularly in countries with strict environmental standards. to boost exports and support India's
economic growth. However, transitioning to green supply chains requires significant investment, stakeholder
collaboration, and support from government, industry, and research organizations. Policies that promote eco-
friendly practices, assist small producers, and raise consumer awareness are essential. Despite the challenges,
the potential rewards in market growth, customer satisfaction, and environmental protection are substantial. By
embracing innovation, India's agro-food industry can lead in sustainable food production, meet evolving
consumer demands, and advance broader environmental and social objectives.
How to create a green supply chain management
Green supply chain management (GSCM) is an integrated approach that considers environmental factors
throughout the supply chain. It encourages sustainability in raw material sourcing, manufacturing, distribution,
and end-of-life disposal. GSCM addresses both economic and sustainability issues, aiming to reduce
environmental impact and improve resource efficiency throughout a product’s life cycle. Key elements include
reverse-engineering products and supply chains, planning production to use fewer resources and generate less
waste, and carefully selecting suppliers and materials. Logistics and marketing strategies also focus on cutting
transportation emissions and encouraging sustainable consumption. Companies that use GSCM can gain a
competitive edge through cost savings, reduced waste, and improved energy efficiency. The push for eco-
friendly products also leads to innovation and new market opportunities. Improved efficiency and supply chain
management further boost business performance, which is important as consumers and stakeholders increasingly
focus on environmental responsibility. Policies and emissions regulations strongly influence the adoption and
success of GSCM initiatives. Hariyani et al. (2024) proposed a framework highlighting sustainable sourcing and
distribution as key components of GSCM. Sustainable sourcing focuses on selecting environmentally and
socially responsible suppliers and materials, assessing suppliers' environmental performance, promoting
recycled or renewable materials, and considering the lifecycle impact of sourced goods. Sustainable distribution
aims to reduce the environmental impacts of logistics and warehousing by optimizing transportation routes, using
low-emission vehicles, adopting energy-efficient warehousing practices, and exploring alternative delivery
methods. The implementation of GSCM is supported by several conceptual models: 1. Triple Bottom Line
Theory stresses balancing economic, social, and environmental performance. 2. Stakeholder Theory highlights
the need to address the concerns of various stakeholders, not just shareholders. 3. Resource-Based View Theory
suggests firms can gain an advantage by developing unique, sustainable practices or technologies. 4. Circular
Economy models promote closed-loop systems that minimize waste and boost resource efficiency. Together,
these models provide a comprehensive approach to implementing GSCM, emphasizing the need to consider
environmental and social impacts alongside economic performance, engage with stakeholders, develop
sustainable capabilities, and move from linear to circular production models.
When companies use Green Supply Chain Management (GSCM) practices, they can reduce their environmental
impact, operate more efficiently, improve their reputation, and create lasting value for both businesses and
society. As environmental concerns grow worldwide, GSCM is becoming an increasingly important part of
business strategy across many industries. New technologies have made GSCM more effective, changing how
companies approach sustainability. Advances like blockchain, IoT, artificial intelligence, and big data analytics
help make supply chains more transparent, efficient, and resource-friendly. For example, blockchain enables
secure tracking of products from start to finish, ensuring that sustainability claims are genuine. IoT devices let
companies monitor conditions and resource use in real time, enabling them to quickly cut waste and save energy.
AI helps with route planning and inventory, reducing emissions and avoiding overproduction. Big data analytics
helps companies spot trends and make better sustainability decisions. New materials, such as bioplastics and
recycled materials, support a circular economy by reducing the need for new raw materials and cutting waste.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 330
www.rsisinternational.org
These changes not only help the environment but can also lower costs and improve products. Working closely
with suppliers is also important. Companies are training suppliers in green practices, offering incentives like
better contracts or shared savings, and setting joint goals to build a shared commitment to sustainability across
the supply chain.
Despite these improvements, organizations still face significant challenges in implementing GSCM. High
upfront costs for green technologies and materials can be a major barrier, especially for smaller companies with
limited funds. The long-term benefits of GSCM, such as lower costs and a better reputation, may not be clear
right away, making it hard to justify the initial investment. Technology and infrastructure can also pose obstacles,
as many organizations, especially in developing countries, may lack access to the latest tools or need to upgrade
outdated systems. Regulations add another layer of complexity, especially for companies operating across
regions with varying rules and standards. This can lead to higher costs and operational issues as companies try
to meet different requirements. Cultural and organizational resistance is another challenge. If employees and
stakeholders are unaware of the benefits of sustainable supply chains, they may be slow to adopt them or prefer
old methods. Overcoming this resistance often requires strong leadership and careful change management.
Addressing these barriers is essential for organizations to get the full benefits of GSCM and help build a
sustainable economy. When done well, GSCM can improve environmental performance, increase efficiency,
reduce costs, and boost brand value. As more consumers want eco-friendly products, companies that overcome
these challenges and adopt GSCM are likely to stand out.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
The literature emphasizes the key role of green supply chain management in fostering economic growth,
particularly amid challenges such as global warming, climate change, and public health issues. To further explore
this topic, a research goal was formulated to extend the investigation. Research on green supply chain
management (GSCM) in the agro food sector highlights several recurring themes: the role of digital technologies,
waste management, climate change, organizational willingness, policy frameworks, and consumer trust.
Together, these studies provide a comprehensive picture of how sustainability practices are reshaping green
supply chains in India and beyond. The conceptual framework for this study is built upon six interrelated
thematic pillars derived from the literature on Green Supply Chain Management (GSCM) in the agro-food sector.
These themes converge to shape a holistic understanding of how sustainability practices enhance
competitiveness and drive economic growth in India’s agricultural sector.
Digital Transformation and Green Technologies: This theme captures the role of emerging technologies, such
as blockchain, IoT, and AI, in improving transparency, resource efficiency, and traceability across the supply
chain. These innovations enable real-time monitoring and predictive analytics, which are essential for optimizing
logistics and reducing environmental impact.
Waste Management and Resource Efficiency: Studies emphasize minimizing waste at the earliest stages of
production and distribution. Efficient resource use, biodegradable packaging, and circular economy principles
are central to reducing ecological footprints and improving operational performance.
Organizational and Structural Factors: Internal willingness, green human capital, and supply chain control
are critical enablers of GSCM. Organizational commitment, training, and stakeholder engagement determine the
success of sustainability initiatives, especially among SMEs and marginal producers.
Policy, Regulation, and Market Dynamics: Government incentives, net-zero policies, and certification
mechanisms influence the adoption of green practices. Market dynamics, such as consumer demand for
sustainable products and international competitiveness, further motivate firms to align with environmental
standards.
Analytical and Modeling Approaches: Quantitative models and simulation techniques help assess uncertainty,
trade-offs, and performance outcomes in green supply chains. These tools support evidence-based decision-
making and strategic planning for business sustainability.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 331
www.rsisinternational.org
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: AI-ML technologies offer high-accuracy assessments of
sustainability metrics, enabling companies to automate evaluations and improve compliance. These tools are
especially valuable in scaling GSCM across diverse and complex supply networks. At the center of this
framework is Green Supply Chain Management in the Agro-Food Sector. This integrates these six themes to
guide empirical analysis and strategic recommendations. The framework reflects a systems-oriented approach,
recognizing that sustainable transformation requires technological innovation, institutional support,
organizational capacity, and collaborative action across the supply chain. In this paper, we incorporate the
previous study and examine its relevance.
Digital Transformation and Technology: A growing body of work emphasizes the importance of digital
technologies in strengthening GSCM. Singh et al. (2025) examined how digital transformation supports carbon
neutrality and encourages circular economy practices. Kumar et al. (2023) found that integrating IoT and
blockchain into food supply chains reduces waste and emissions while improving food quality and security.
Similarly, Yu et al. (2025) identified clusters of digital transformation in agri food supply chains, including
sustainability, operations, performance, and risk management. Industry 4.0 and 5.0 technologiessuch as AI,
robotics, smart sensors, and big dataare increasingly linked to sustainability outcomes. Hassoun et al. (2022)
connected these technologies to the Sustainable Development Goals, while Singh et al. (2025) highlighted how
Industry 5.0 integrates human collaboration with advanced digital tools to promote sustainable food production.
Despite these advances, challenges remain. Narwane et al. (2022) highlighted interoperability, trust, and security
issues in IoT adoption, while Halder et al. (2025) noted persistent risks, including cyberattacks and concerns
about data validity.
Waste Management and Circular Economy: Waste reduction is another central theme. Kharola et al. (2022)
stressed that preventing waste early in the supply chain is more effective than addressing it later. Kumar and
Agrawal (2023) revealed that inefficient supply chains account for nearly one-third of India’s annual waste of
fresh agricultural products, underscoring the need for restructuring. Panpatil and Kant (2022) analyzed green
supply chain practices and found that deliberate sustainability drivers are critical to performance. Circular
economy approaches are widely recommended. Gardas et al. (2018) identified environmental management and
regulatory pressure as key drivers of performance in India’s agro sector. Packaging innovations, recycling, and
reuse of byproducts are seen as essential strategies for minimizing waste and improving efficiency.
AI and Machine Learning Applications: Artificial intelligence and machine learning are emerging as powerful
enablers of GSCM. Saha et al. (2025) demonstrated that AI/ML technologies achieve up to 99% accuracy,
compared with 8090% for manual assessments, reducing downtime and labor costs while strengthening supply
chains. Andika et al. (2025) integrated AI and ML with Life Cycle Assessment to improve predictive capabilities.
Nath et al. (2024) further showed that AI can enhance crop yield prediction, quality control, and supply chain
optimization, contributing to both sustainability and food security.
Climate Change and Food Security: Climate change poses significant risks to agro-food supply chains.
Tchonkouang et al. (2024) reviewed over 1,500 publications and concluded that extreme weather conditions
weaken food supply chains by affecting agricultural output, prices, and food safety. Sridhar et al. (2023)
highlighted that pandemics and climate change threaten food security, leaving 30% of the population without
adequate access to food. Trivedi et al. (2021) emphasized the importance of climate-resilient supply chains in
Uttarakhand. Policy responses are also critical. Singh (2025) found that net-zero policies improve supply chain
sustainability and agility, while Sharma et al. (2024) identified international pressure as a key driver of the
adoption of decarbonized technologies in India’s food supply chains.
Green Human Capital and Organizational Readiness: Organizational willingness and human capital are
decisive factors in GSCM adoption. Tjahjadi et al. (2022) showed that green human capital readiness influences
SME performance, with market orientation and supply chain practices mediating this effect. Chakraborty et al.
(2023b) highlighted internal factors such as top management commitment, reverse logistics, and material
management as critical drivers. Sharma et al. (2016) used AHP analysis to rank performance indicators,
identifying internal environmental management and regulatory pressure as the most significant. Resistance to
change remains a barrier. Studies note that cultural and organizational inertia can slow adoption, requiring strong
leadership and effective change management.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 332
www.rsisinternational.org
Policy, Regulation, and Stakeholder Engagement: Policy frameworks and stakeholder engagement are
consistently identified as enablers of GSCM. Gardas et al. (2018) emphasized regulatory pressure as a major
driver of performance. Rueda et al. (2016) argued that private investment is essential for ecological
sustainability, suggesting that relocating firms without sustainable technologies is not sustainable. Sharma et al.
(2024) developed a consensus model to assess suppliers’ ability to track sustainable performance, highlighting
financial strength as a key factor. Cooperative models also play a role. Gu et al. (2024) showed that contract
farming and subsidies encourage technology adoption and increase farmer participation, while Sargani et al.
(2025) linked digital technology adoption to improved resilience and productivity in China’s farming sector.
Food Quality, Safety, and Consumer Trust: Finally, food quality and consumer trust are central to
competitiveness. Song et al. (2017) demonstrated that certification and reputation improve safety, quality, and
international competitiveness. Yadav et al. (2020) noted that blockchain adoption in India’s food supply chains
addresses contamination scandals and enhances traceability. Innovative packaging and preservation technologies
also contribute. Chaudhary et al. (2024) reviewed the use of ionizing radiation to extend shelf life while
preserving nutrients, and Joshi et al. (2024) analyzed osmotic dehydration as a method to improve supply chain
quality in India’s fruit industry. Further, its extension, we are incorporating all intext citation in the tabular form
given below:
Author & Year
Methodology
RESULTS & Findings
Connection to Current
Study
Abad et al. (2023).
RNRAMSSP
modeling
validated with
EVPI & VSS
Effective in managing supply
uncertainty
Provides methodological
insights for uncertainty in
agro-food supply chains
Agarwal et al.
(2025).
Quantitative
analysis
Green infrastructure drives
supply chain circularity via
digital adoption
Aligns with eco-friendly
technology adoption in India
Anand et al. (2024).
Grey DEMATEL
& ANP
Barriers to collaborative
practices identified
Provides insights into waste
reduction
Andika et al.
(2025).
AI + Life Cycle
Assessment
Enhanced predictive capabilities
for sustainability
Suggests integrating AI with
LCA for agro-food chains
Ashaolu & Ashaolu
(2020).
Review
Industrialization increases food
fraud
Highlights the need for green
& organic products
Birasnav et al.
(2022).
Theoretical
framework &
research model
Identified antecedents &
outcomes of GSCM practices
Provides foundational
attributes for evaluating
Indian agro-food firms
Chakraborty et al.
(2023).
Interpretive
Structural
Modeling (ISM)
Identified internal GSCM
factors; highlighted top
management commitment,
reverse logistics, and material
management as critical drivers
Reinforces organizational
readiness and leadership as
key enablers of GSCM
adoption in India’s agro-food
sector
Chaudhary et al.
(2024).
Review
Irradiation extends the shelf life
of food
Suggests tech for reducing
waste
Das et al. (2022).
Game-theoretic
comparison
Profits, greening levels, and
prices vary across structures
Highlight’s role of small
retailers in sustainable
development
Das et al. (2025).
Game-theoretic
modeling
Manufacturer cooperation
boosts greening but raises
prices; competition lowers
Demonstrates trade-offs
relevant to Indian agro-food
markets
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 333
www.rsisinternational.org
prices but undermines
sustainability
Fu et al. (2025).
Empirical study
Farmers livelihood risks linked
to green transformation
Connects socio-economic
risks to GSCM adoption
Gardas et al.
(2018a).
DEMATEL
analysis
Environmental management and
regulatory pressure are key
drivers
Identifies causal factors for
India’s agro-sector
Gardas, B., Raut,
R., Jagtap, A. H., &
Narkhede, B. (2018)
Modeling & KPI
analysis
Explored key performance
indicators (KPIs) of GSCM in
the agro-industrywaste
reduction, energy efficiency,
and eco-friendly packaging
Provides a performance
measurement framework
directly relevant to evaluating
GSCM adoption in India’s
agro-food sector
Gu et al. (2024).
Modeling
Subsidies & cooperatives boost
green tech adoption
Suggests policy incentives for
India
Halder et al. (2025).
Survey on AI &
IoT
AI & SIIoT improve agri-food
security but face cyber risks
Highlights digital security
challenges
Hassoun et al.
(2022).
Industry 4.0
analysis
Linked AI, IoT, blockchain to
SDGs in food systems
Shows tech-enabled
ecological transition
Hassoun et al.
(2024).
Industry 4.0
review
Smart sensors, AI, and
blockchain improve
sustainability
Shows tech-enabled
transformation
Joshi et al. (2024).
Review
Osmotic dehydration improves
supply chain quality
Provides food preservation
insights
Khan et al. (2023).
Survey
IoT adoption barriers: cost,
infrastructure
Highlights adoption
challenges
Kharola et al.
(2022).
Case-based
analysis
Waste prevention is most
effective at the early stages
Supports resource efficiency
focus in agro-food GSCM
Kumar & Agrawal
(2023).
Case study
Identified 34 challenges in
AFSCs
Provides insights into
restructuring Indian supply
chains
Kumar et al. (2023).
Empirical study
using IoT &
blockchain
Reduced waste, improved food
quality, enhanced food security
Demonstrates tech-enabled
transparency in food supply
chains
Le (2023)
Empirical study
CSR & GSCM promote
sustainable consumption
Connects CSR to agro-food
sustainability
Narwane et al.
(2022).
IoT adoption
study
Challenges: interoperability,
trust, security
Highlights barriers to tech
adoption in India
Nath et al. (2024).
Review
AI enhances sustainability &
food security
Supports AI integration in
agro-food chains
Panpatil & Kant
(2022).
Analytical
modeling of
GSCPs
Driver GSCPs are strategic;
dependent GSCPs are
performance-focused
Offers categorization useful
for Indian agro-food firms
Phiri et al. (2023).
Review
Farming practices linked to soil
degradation
Suggests sustainable farming
solutions
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 334
www.rsisinternational.org
Rajan &
Radhakrishnan
(2022).
Review
Ohmic heating improves seed
germination
Suggests sustainable post-
harvest methods
Rajesh (2020)
Decision-making
model
SSCM offers a competitive
advantage
Provides an integrative model
for India
Raut et al. (2019).
Fuzzy multi-
criteria approach
Cold logistics reduces food
losses
Suggests logistics solutions
for India
Rueda et al. (2016).
Empirical study
Private investment drives
ecological sustainability
Suggests investment
strategies for Indian agro-
food firms
Saha et al. (2025).
AI-ML application
AI-ML achieves 99% accuracy
vs. 80–90% manual
Demonstrates the potential of
AI for monitoring GSCM
outcomes
Sargani et al.
(2025).
Empirical study
Digital adoption improves
resilience & productivity
Reinforces tech adoption
benefits
Sazvar et al. (2018).
Modelling
sustainable supply
chains
Hybrid organic-conventional
model reduces costs &
environmental risks
Balances sustainability with
economic growth
Sharma et al.
(2016).
AHP analysis
Internal environmental
management & regulatory
pressure key
Identifies performance
indicators relevant to India
Sharma et al.
(2024a).
Policy analysis
International pressure drives
decarbonization
Connects global policy to
Indian food chains
Sharma et al.
(2024b).
Delphi method
Financial strength key for
supplier evaluation
Offers evaluation framework
for Indian agro-food suppliers
Shetty & Bhat
(2021).
Review
Globalization intensifies
competition
Reinforces need for GSCM in
India
Singh (2025)
Policy analysis
Net-zero policies enhance
agility & sustainability
Connects policy frameworks
to competitiveness in agro-
food sector
Singh et al. (2023).
Grey causal
modelling
Digital twins enhance resilience
Supports resilience-building
in Indian food chains
Singh et al. (2025a).
Conceptual &
empirical analysis
Digital transformation supports
carbon neutrality & circular
economy
Highlights tech adoption
relevance for India’s agro-
food GSCM
Singh et al. (2025b).
Systematic review
Industry 5.0 integrates AI, IoT,
robotics
Shows future direction for
sustainable food production
Song et al. (2017).
Empirical study
Certification improves safety,
quality, and competitiveness
Supports the role of standards
in export competitiveness
Sridhar et al.
(2023).
Review
Climate change & pandemics
threaten food security
Supports resilience-building
in agro-food GSCM
Sreedharan & Raju
(2018).
Green Lean Six
Sigma model
Improved public-sector services
Suggests lean integration for
the Indian agro-food
Tchonkouang et al.
(2024).
LITERATURE
REVIEW
Climate change weakens food
supply chains
Highlights resilience needs in
India
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 335
www.rsisinternational.org
Tjahjadi et al.
(2022).
Survey of 182
SMEs
Green human capital readiness
improves performance via
market orientation
Suggests that workforce
readiness is critical for Indian
SMEs
Trivedi et al.
(2021).
Case study
A climate-resilient supply chain
is essential in Uttarakhand
Regional insights for
resilience
Yadav et al. (2020).
ISM-DEMATTEL
& fuzzy-
MICMAC
Blockchain adoption barriers
identified
Highlights early-stage
blockchain challenges
Yadav et al.
(2024a).
SEM & ANN
analysis
Digital technologies positively
affect green integration &
innovation
Reinforces role of digital
tools in sustainable food
chains
Yadav et al.
(2024b).
SEM analysis
Digital technologies positively
affect green innovation
Reinforces tech-driven
sustainability
Yu et al. (2025).
Empirical
clustering
Identified 5 clusters in digital
agri-food supply chains
Provides theoretical
grounding for digital
adoption
The research objectives are as follows:
1. To identify and classify green supply chain management practices adopted by agro-food companies in
India.
2. This study examines the roles of policy mechanisms and institutional support in facilitating green supply
chain transitions in the agro-food sector.
3. To assess the barriers and enablers influencing the implementation of green supply chain management
practices throughout various stages of the agro-food value chainprocurement, processing, packaging,
and distribution.
This study adopts a conceptual framework grounded in multiple theoretical perspectives: Triple Bottom Line,
Stakeholder Theory, Resource-Based View, and Circular Economy models, to examine the impact of Green
Supply Chain Management (GSCM) practices on competitiveness and economic growth in India’s agro-food
sector. The framework identifies five core GSCM practices: sustainable farming, green processing, eco-friendly
packaging, green logistics, and reverse logistics. These practices serve as independent variables that influence
three mediating factors: operational efficiency, innovation capacity, and brand reputation & consumer trust.
These mediators, in turn, affect key outcomes such as firm competitiveness, economic growth indicators, and
environmental sustainability. The framework also incorporates four moderating variables: policy and
institutional support, technological infrastructure, firm size and resources, and global market standards, which
shape the strength and direction of the relationships between mediators and outcomes. This structure enables a
nuanced understanding of how GSCM practices contribute to performance improvements and strategic
advantages in the agro-food sector. The conceptual model guided data collection, variable categorization, and
hypothesis formulation. A research methodology was adopted to address the stated objectives, relying on a
systematic analysis of secondary data. Data sources included government reports from the Ministry of
Agriculture and the FSSAI, as well as industry publications and trade databases such as APEDA and NABARD.
Due to limited data availability. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize adoption levels and firm
characteristics. The lack of primary data limited the application of advanced statistical tools to analyze green
supply chain management performance in India's agro-industry. Research questions were developed to guide the
classification and analysis phases, thereby supporting the achievement of the research questions, which are as
follows:
1. What is the relationship between green supply chain management and economic growth in India’s agro-
food sector?
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 336
www.rsisinternational.org
2. How do green supply chain practices affect the competitiveness of agro-food companies in India?
3. How much do green logistics and sustainable sourcing contribute toward cost savings and market
development?
Data analysis and interpretation:
This conceptual framework illustrates the dynamic interplay between GSCM practices and their impact on
competitiveness and economic growth in India’s agro-food sector. It begins with five core sustainable practices:
sustainable farming, green processing, eco-friendly packaging, green logistics, and reverse logistics, which serve
as independent variables. These practices influence three mediating factors: operational efficiency, innovation
capacity, and brand reputation & consumer trust. These mediators, in turn, drive key outcomes such as firm
competitiveness, economic growth indicators, and environmental sustainability. The strength and direction of
these relationships are moderated by policy and institutional support, technological infrastructure, firm size and
resources, and global market standards. This framework integrates theoretical insights from the Triple Bottom
Line, Stakeholder Theory, Resource-Based View, and Circular Economy models, offering a holistic lens to
understand how GSCM can transform India’s agro-food supply chains into sustainable engines of growth. In this
study, we are incorporating five tables to present the study for two primary reasons: first, the unavailability of
data directly related to the research topic; second, the premise that production and consumption patterns are
reflected in import and export data. In each country, certain products and services exhibit surpluses or deficits,
leading to imports or exports to support the national economy. Table 1 provides insights into commercial
agricultural products. Indian tea is renowned worldwide, and coffee also contributes significantly to the country's
gross domestic product. Analysis of Table 1 indicates that Indian tea and coffee make substantial contributions
to national income and influence both production and employment sectors.
Table 1: Tea and Coffee import and export by India, Quantity in Thousand Tons and Value in Rupees
in Crore
Year
Coffee
Import
Export
Import
Export
Quantity
Value
Quantity
Value
Quantity
Value
Quantity
Value
Thousand
Tones
Rupees in
Crore
Thousand
Tones
Rupees in
Crore
Thousand
Tones
Rupees in
Crore
Thousand
Tones
Rupees in
Crore
2014-
15
28.39
388.66
234.39
4171.25
74.88
930.47
463.55
4973.25
2015-
16
23.72
377.47
245.7
4719
65.61
801.83
255.74
5125.45
2016-
17
24.89
338.35
243.43
4905.64
78.04
926.81
288.61
5646.43
2017-
18
24.94
356.99
272.89
5396.65
77.22
996.5
317.83
6245.36
2018-
19
28.851378
417.9649
2
270.3064
5828.338
3
82.772392
958.5876
282.8399
5721.975
4
2019-
20
21.935219
411.06209
254.80066
5851.107
8
88.087665
962.1589
6
257.03245
5236.762
6
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 337
www.rsisinternational.org
2020-
21
38.585218
658.8739
4
212.68766
5603.501
7
78.496484
900.5649
8
245.2098
5339.646
7
2021-
22
30.343053
475.6816
6
208.61416
559.6674
8
84.722607
1054.299
333.09894
761.3620
8
2022-
23P
26.824153
427.1851
206.29666
5629.592
3
93.0621
1509.263
250.15391
7251.478
8
Sources: Environment StatisticsVol. I, National Statistical Office, Ministry of Statistics and Programme
Implementation, Government of India
Table 2 presents data on pulses and spices concerning India's imports and exports. The data suggest that Indian
pulses currently experience a deficit, while spices exhibit a surplus within the Indian economy. Regarding
branding, India possesses an opportunity to develop the spices sector and faces a challenge in the pulses sector.
Green supply chain management offers an opportunity to expand the supply side of the economy and potentially
gain a competitive advantage in global markets.
Table 2: Pulses and Spices import and export by India, Quantity in Thousand Tons and Value in Rupees
in Crore
Year
Spices
Import
Export
Import
Export
Quantity
Value
Quantity
Value
Quantity
Value
Quantity
Value
Thousand
Tones
Rupees in
Crore
Thousand
Tones
Rupees in
Crore
Thousand
Tones
Rupees in
Crore
Thousand
Tones
Rupees in
Crore
2014-
15
4584.85
17062.94
222.14
1218.31
163.09
4393.25
939.01
14847.74
2015-
16
5797.71
25619.06
255.72
1655.9
197.06
5399.95
831.68
16630.14
2016-
17
6609.49
28523.18
136.72
1277.7
242.29
5760.25
1014.45
19111.25
2017-
18
5607.53
18748.57
179.6
1469.63
222.33
6385.26
1096.32
20084.91
2018-
19
2527.875
8035.295
3
287.131
1801.512
240.55522
7932.703
4
1133.8894
23217.77
3
2019-
20
2898.078
10221.44
8
232.081
1511.7996
320.93534
10186.93
4
1193.4409
25642.04
1
2020-
21
2466.156
11937.589
276.927
1977.626
7
344.21135
8070.5311
1607.0585
29529.39
3
2021-
22
2.699694
16627.58
2
0.387208
268.2904
4
364.06763
9684.740
5
1427.7181
2903.926
6
2022-
23P
1.998006
12705.15
4
0.539763
3783.777
3
343.24891
9073.694
5
1026.413
24195.97
9
Sources: Environment Statistics - Vol. I, National Statistical Office, Ministry of Statistics and Programme
Implementation, Government of India
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 338
www.rsisinternational.org
Table 3 presents data on India's imports and exports of sugar, fruit, and vegetable seeds. Sugar and vegetable
seeds serve as key ingredients in numerous agricultural products available in the market. The data indicate that
India benefits from positive externalities from expanding and improving product quality through green supply
chain management.
Table 3: Sugar and Fruits/Vegetable Seeds import and export by India, Quantity in Thousand Tons and
Value in Rupees in Crore
Year
Sugar
Fruits / Vegetable
Seeds
Import
Export
Import
Export
Quantity
Value
Quantity
Value
Quantity
Value
Quantity
Value
Thousand
Tones
Rupees in
Crore
Thousand
Tones
Rupees in
Crore
Thousand
Tones
Rupees in
Crore
Thousand
Tones
Rupees in
Crore
2014
-15
1538.64
3668.21
1955.19
5328.83
14.01
611.53
12.5
427.04
2015
-16
1943.13
4037.86
3844.45
9824.52
14.33
703.03
13.1
529.19
2016
-17
2146.15
6868.61
2544.01
8659.54
14.07
653.33
11.29
522.75
2017
-18
2402.98
6035.84
1757.93
5225.6
16.05
768.26
14.47
670.91
2018
-19
1490.605
3175.3881
3989.661
9523.1367
19.725768
835.80749
17.5324
866.31258
2019
-20
1117.726
2473.2455
5798.534
13981.556
17.775563
851.78724
19.221693
771.66033
2020
-21
1963.998
4720.0118
7517.923
20668.566
24.983614
1060.2374
32.285421
929.62867
2021
-22
0.359615
1263.188
10.45708
3434.4685
19.761889
1043.1247
20.989493
84.382432
2022
-23
0.495093
2049.2526
9.655156
37397.858
25.721448
1047.3258
14.488531
802.4929
Sources: Environment Statistics - Vol. I, National Statistical Office, Ministry of Statistics and Programme
Implementation, Government of India
Table 4 presents data on India's imports and exports of fresh fruits and vegetables. As an agriculture-based
economy, India possesses significant opportunities to develop agricultural products and services. The data
suggest that India has an abundance of vegetable products but limited fresh fruit production. This disparity may
be attributed to underdeveloped agricultural infrastructure, particularly the lack of cold storage and silos needed
to preserve fresh fruits and vegetables. Green supply chain management could facilitate extended storage and
maintain food quality, thereby improving consumption patterns.
Table 4: Fresh Fruits and Vegetables import and export by India, Quantity in Thousand Tons and
Value in Rupees in Crore
Year
Fresh Vegetables
Import
Export
Import
Export
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 339
www.rsisinternational.org
Quantity
Value
Quantity
Value
Quantity
Value
Quantity
Value
Thousand
Tones
Rupees in
Crore
Thousand
Tones
Rupees in
Crore
Thousand
Tones
Rupees in
Crore
Thousand
Tones
Rupees in
Crore
2014-
15
900.98
9566.81
539.23
3160.08
8.24
11.14
2081.8
4666.45
2015-
16
857.9
11071.57
654.66
4191.24
140.73
394.45
2104.36
5237.1
2016-
17
1057.51
11290.62
817.06
4974.21
8.55
11.12
3404.07
5790.71
2017-
18
994.7
12524.55
714
4913.28
15.66
25.64
2448.02
5297.72
2018-
19
1124.178
13931.65
5
823.085
5538.152
7
14.749
24.21771
2
3192.493
5679.104
3
2019-
20
993.73
14137.08
5
834.835
5496.381
150.097
594.8164
5
1930.511
4617.340
7
2020-
21
1211.833
15764.86
2
973.177
5668.749
6
72.898
225.5656
8
2339.675
5388.026
3
2021-
22
1.552494
18342.08
5
1.16644
656.5838
0.045989
138.1123
2.468404
607.5825
4
2022-
23P
1.213848
16584.03
6
0.745419
4229.853
2
0.017693
35.45279
6
2.678521
6005.795
5
Sources: Environment Statistics - Vol. I, National Statistical Office, Ministry of Statistics and Programme
Implementation, Government of India
Table 5 presents India's imports and exports of processed vegetables, processed fruits, and juices. In India, a
significant proportion of the working class has adopted processed foods and increased consumption of fruit and
juice. The table details the progress in processing vegetables, fruits, and juices from 201415 to 202223,
providing insight into the positive impact on these sectors. Numerous agricultural producer organizations have
been established in India to cooperate with local farmers and organize markets, thereby facilitating the
production of high-quality goods and services. Green supply chain management offers an opportunity to improve
product quality, promote eco-friendly agricultural practices, and address health concerns through technology and
certification of agricultural products, eventually improving perceptions, strengthening the agricultural sector,
and increasing the GDP ratio across other sectors of the economy.
Table 5: Processed Vegetables, Fruits, and Juices import and export by India, Quantity in Thousand
Tons and Value in Rupees in Crore
Year
Processed Fruits and Juices
Import
Export
Import
Export
Quantity
Value
Quantity
Value
Quantity
Value
Quantity
Value
Thousand
Tones
Rupees in
Crore
Thousand
Tones
Rupees in
Crore
Thousand
Tones
Rupees in
Crore
Thousand
Tones
Rupees in
Crore
2014-
15
10.96
104.45
186.04
1721.89
33.55
499.54
588.38
3626.86
2015-
16
15.38
120.33
174.43
1697.22
40.49
526.49
532.29
3767.08
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 340
www.rsisinternational.org
2016-
17
13.32
115.26
192.86
1765.75
42.99
548.1
533.15
3921.08
2017-
18
15.34
134.83
212.2
1823.36
53.59
803.81
573.28
4169.13
2018-
19
18.097792
161.8312
4
228.967
2055.411
59.123888
909.3366
9
594.48733
4481.251
2
2019-
20
33.62182
253.6752
8
223.30825
2212.031
9
54.10236
771.2203
3
568.88301
4590.964
2020-
21
18.265594
163.5232
7
367.09892
3150.056
44.436756
662.9163
5
532.87072
5150.803
1
2021-
22
20.714024
209.0909
4
308.27531
307.2768
5
63.163835
997.7828
1
629.70418
580.2532
1
2022-
23P
19.179833
217.6587
4
293.25412
3216.937
2
50.419526
1008.634
1
514.48357
5969.577
6
Sources: Environment Statistics - Vol. I, National Statistical Office, Ministry of Statistics and Programme
Implementation, Government of India
DISCUSSION
The data suggest that many people in India still face malnutrition, even though markets and the government
focus on public health and morale. Although India has the largest working population in the world, its energy
levels are lower than those of developed countries. Green supply chain management could help maintain value
and encourage more environmentally friendly practices.
The study finds that Green Supply Chain Management (GSCM) practices, like eco-friendly packaging, reverse
logistics, and energy-efficient transport, make India’s agro-food sector more competitive. These practices help
reduce inefficiencies, improve product quality, and build stronger brands, creating long-term value for
companies. Similar findings by Kumar et al. (2023) show that green supply chain management cuts waste and
emissions while improving food quality. However, there are still barriers to wider adoption, such as high initial
costs, certification fees, and infrastructure challenges, which especially affect small producers. Panpatil and Kant
(2022) point out that while some GSCM practices are essential, others focus more on performance, making it
hard to balance sustainability and profits. Different regulations across regions also make compliance harder,
especially for multinational companies. The results highlight the need for supportive policies and collaboration.
Government incentives, green loans, and bonds can help lower financial barriers. Industry groups and NGOs are
important for setting standards and offering technical help. As Das et al. (2025) note, working together in the
supply chain helps with greening but requires careful cost and pricing management. In India, it’s especially
important to support small producers so they can be part of the move to sustainable supply chains. The findings
also support several key models: the Triple Bottom Line (balancing economic, social, and environmental goals),
Stakeholder Theory (addressing the needs of all stakeholders), the Resource-Based View (using unique
sustainable strengths for advantage), and Circular Economy models (reducing waste through closed-loop
systems). Together, these models help explain GSCM adoption in the agro-food sector.
CONCLUSION
This study shows that Green and Sustainable Supply Chain Management (GSCM) is both an environmental
responsibility and an economic need for India’s agro-food industry. Making sustainability part of every step
from farming to packaging and distributioncan help companies reduce their environmental impact, operate
more efficiently, and identify new market opportunities. Using advanced technologies also helps Indian
agriculture become a leader in eco-innovation. While there are challenges such as financial constraints,
infrastructure gaps, and regulatory differences, the long-term benefits of GSCM outweigh the costs.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 341
www.rsisinternational.org
Companies that lead in adopting green practices will be better able to manage climate risks, government
demands, and changing consumer preferences. Small producers, especially, need targeted support, such as
subsidies, training, and assistance with certification, to ensure everyone can take part. On a policy level,
GSCM not only helps companies compete but also supports national economic growth and environmental
protection. By working together and adhering to global sustainability standards, India’s agro-food sector can
strengthen its position in world markets and address urgent environmental challenges. Overall, GSCM gives
India a real chance to combine growth with sustainability, helping the agro-food industry stay competitive and
resilient while supporting broader environmental and social goals.
REFERENCES
1. Abad, A. R. K. K., Barzinpour, F., & Pishvaee, M. S. (2023). Towards a circular economy for the
pomegranate fruit supply chain under dynamic uncertainty: A case study. Computers & Chemical
Engineering, 178, 108362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2023.108362
2. Agarwal, R., Mehrotra, A., Alofaysan, H., & Mahto, R. V. (2025). Digital technologies and green
infrastructure: Advancing a resilient circular supply chain. Technovation, 148, 103329.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103329
3. Anand, S., Barua, M. K., Katiyar, R., & Meet, R. (2024). Minimizing waste, maximizing sustainability:
Analyzing collaborative practice implementation barriers in the agri-fresh produce industry. Sustainable
Futures, 10.0398. Https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100398
4. Andika, A., Perdana, T., Chaerani, D., & Utomo, D. S. (2025). Transitioning towards zero waste in the
agri-food supply chain: a review of sustainable circular agri-food supply chains. Sustainable Futures,
100917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100917
5. Ashaolu, T. J., & Ashaolu, J. O. (2020). Perspectives on the trends, challenges, and benefits of green,
smart, and organic (GSO) foods. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science, 22, 100273.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgfs.2020.100273
6. Birasnav, M., Chaudhary, R., Dunne, J. H., Bienstock, J., & Seaman, C. (2022). Green supply chain
management: A theoretical framework and research directions. Computers & Industrial Engineering,
172, 108441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108441
7. Chakraborty, A., Amin, M. A., & Baldacci, R. (2023). Analysis of internal factors of green supply chain
management: An interpretive structural modeling approach. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 7,
100099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2023.100099
8. Chaudhary, S., Kumar, S., Kumar, V., Singh, B., & Dhiman, A. (2024). Irradiation: A tool for the
sustainability of fruit and vegetable supply chainsadvancements and future trends. Radiation Physics
and Chemistry, 217, 111511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2024.111511
9. Das, M., Jana, D. K., & Alam, S. (2022). Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 4, 100054.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2022.100054
10. Das, M., Muchi, B., Alam, S., & Jana, D. K. (2025). A sustainability and profitability optimization model
in three-stage green supply chains under uncertainty with competitive and cooperative game dynamics.
Supply Chain Analytics, 100114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sca.2025.100114
11. Fu, Z., Zhang, C., Huang, Z., Jia, L., Sun, G., & Wang, W. (2025). Advancing sustainable and innovative
agriculture: An empirical study of farmers’ livelihood risks and the green transformation of food
production. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 10(4), 100732.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2025.100732
12. Gardas, B. B., Raut, R. D., & Narkhede, B. (2018). Evaluating critical causal factors for post-harvest
losses (PHL) in the fruit and vegetable supply chain in India using the DEMATEL approach. Journal of
Cleaner Production, 199, 4761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.153
13. Gardas, B., Raut, R., Jagtap, A. H., & Narkhede, B. (2018). Exploring the key performance indicators of
green supply chain management in the agro-industry. Journal of Modeling in Management, 14(1), 260
283. https://doi.org/10.1108/jm2-12-2017-0139
14. Gu, B., Xu, L., Fu, Y., & Chen, J. (2024). Green agricultural technology extension strategies considering
the impacts of industrial organizations: direct subsidies versus indirect incentives. Journal of Cleaner
Production, 143991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143991
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 342
www.rsisinternational.org
15. Halder, S., Islam, M. R., Mamun, Q., Mahboubi, A., Walsh, P., & Islam, M. Z. (2025). A comprehensive
survey on AI-enabled secure social industrial IoT in the agri-food supply chain. Smart Agricultural
Technology, 100902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2025.100902
16. Hariyani, D., Hariyani, P., Mishra, S., & Sharma, M. K. (2024). A literature review of green supply chain
management for sustainable sourcing and distribution. Waste Management Bulletin.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wmb.2024.11.009
17. Hassoun, A., Dankar, I., Bhat, Z., & Bouzembrak, Y. (2024). Unveiling the relationship between food
unit operations and Food Industry 4.0: A short review. Heliyon, 10(20), e39388.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39388
18. Hassoun, A., Prieto, M. A., Carpena, M., Bouzembrak, Y., Marvin, H. J., Pallarés, N., Barba, F. J.,
Bangar, S. P., Chaudhary, V., Ibrahim, S., & Bono, G. (2022). Exploring the role of green and Industry
4.0 technologies in achieving sustainable development goals in the food sector. Food Research
International, 162, 112068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2022.112068
19. Joshi, A., Gupta, A. K., Mansi, N., Semwal, S., Deoli, N., Rather, M. A., Naik, B., Kumar, V., Jha, A.
K., Rustagi, S., & Preet, M. S. (2024). Sustainable solutions for food security: Evaluating pre-treatment
technologies in the growing fruits and vegetables industry in India. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy,
39, 101580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2024.101580
20. Khan, S., Singh, R., Khan, S., & Ngah, A. H. (2023). Unearthing the barriers to Internet of Things
adoption in the food supply chain: A developing country perspective. Green Technologies and
Sustainability, 1(2), 100023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.grets.2023.100023
21. Kharola, S., Ram, M., Mangla, S. K., Goyal, N., Nautiyal, O., Pant, D., & Kazancoglu, Y. (2022).
Exploring the green waste management problem in food supply chains: A circular economy context.
Journal of Cleaner Production, 351, 131355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131355
22. Kumar, A., & Agrawal, S. (2023). Challenges and opportunities for agri-fresh food supply chain
management in India. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 212, 108161.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2023.108161
23. Kumar, M., Choubey, K., Raut, R. D., & Jagtap, S. (2023). Enablers to achieve zero hunger through IoT
and blockchain technology and transform the green food supply chain systems. Journal of Cleaner
Production, 405, 136894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136894
24. Le, T. T. (2023). The association of corporate social responsibility and sustainable consumption and
production patterns: The mediating role of green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner
Production, 414, 137435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137435
25. Narwane, V. S., Gunasekaran, A., & Gardas, B. B. (2022). Unlocking the adoption challenges of IoT in
the Indian agricultural and food supply chain. Smart Agricultural Technology, 2, 100035.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2022.100035
26. Nath, P. C., Mishra, A. K., Sharma, R., Bhunia, B., Mishra, B., Tiwari, A., Nayak, P. K., Sharma, M.,
Bhuyan, T., Kaushal, S., Mohanta, Y. K., & Sridhar, K. (2024). Recent advances in artificial intelligence
towards a sustainable future for the agri-food industry. Food Chemistry, 447, 138945.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.138945
27. Panpatil, S. S., & Kant, R. (2022). Green supply chain management implementation: Modeling green
supply chain practices (GSCPs). Journal of Advances in Management Research, 19(3), 389413.
https://doi.org/10.1108/jamr-07-2021-0241
28. Phiri, R., Rangappa, S. M., & Siengchin, S. (2023). Agro-waste for renewable and sustainable green
production: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 434, 139989.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139989
29. Rajan, A., & Radhakrishnan, M. (2022). Green Technologies for Sustainable Food Production and
Preservation: An overview of ohmic heating, infrared heating, and UV light technology. In Elsevier
eBooks (pp. 184197). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-823960-5.00066-4
30. Rajesh, R. (2020). Sustainable supply chains in the Indian context: An integrative decision-making
model. Technology in Society, 61, 101230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101230
31. Raut, R. D., Gardas, B. B., Narwane, V. S., & Narkhede, B. E. (2019). Improvement in food losses in
fruit and vegetable supply chains: A cold third-party logistics approach. Operations Research
Perspectives, 6, 100117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orp.2019.100117
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 343
www.rsisinternational.org
32. Rueda X., Garrett R. D., & Lambin, E. F. (2016). Corporate investments in supply chain sustainability:
Selecting instruments in the agri-food industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 24802492.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.026
33. Saha, D., Padhiary, M., & Chandrakar, N. (2025). AI Vision and Machine Learning for Enhanced
Automation in the Food Industry: A Systematic Review. Food and Humanity, 100587.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foohum.2025.100587
34. Sargani, G. R., Wang, B., Leghari, S. J., & Ruan, J. (2025). Is digital transformation the key to
agricultural strength? A novel approach to productivity and supply chain resilience. Smart Agricultural
Technology, 100838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2025.100838
35. Sazvar, Z., Rahmani, M., & Govindan, K. (2018). A sustainable supply chain for organic and
conventional agro-food products: The role of demand substitution, climate change, and public health.
Journal of Cleaner Production, 194, 564583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.118
36. Sharma, M., Antony, R., Vadalkar, S., & Ishizaka, A. (2024). Role of Industry 4.0 technologies and
human-machine interaction for decarbonization of food supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production,
468, 142922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142922
37. Sharma, R., Kannan, D., Darbari, J. D., & Jha, P. (2024). Group Decision-Making Model for the
Selection of Performance Indicators for Sustainable Supplier Evaluation in Agro-Food Supply Chain.
International Journal of Production Economics, 277, 109353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109353
38. Sharma, V. K., Chandna, P., & Bhardwaj, A. (2016). Green supply chain management-related
performance indicators in the agro-industry: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 11941208.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.103
39. Shetty, S. K., & Bhat, K. S. (2021). Green supply chain management practices implementation and
sustainability: A review. Materials Today Proceedings, 52, 735740.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.10.135
40. Singh, G., Rajesh, R., Daultani, Y., & Misra, S. C. (2023). Enhancing resilience and sustainability in
food supply chains using Digital Twin technology: A grey causal modeling (GCM) approach. Computers
& Industrial Engineering, 179, 109172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109172
41. Singh, K. A., Patra, F., Ghosh, T., Mahnot, N. K., Dutta, H., & Duary, R. K. (2025). Advancing Food
Systems with Industry 5.0: A Systematic Review of Smart Technologies, Sustainability, and Resource
Optimization. Sustainable Futures, 9, 100694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100694
42. Singh, K., Chaudhuri, R., & Chatterjee, S. (2025). Assessing the impact of digital transformation on the
green supply chain to achieve carbon neutrality and accelerate circular economy initiatives. Computers
& Industrial Engineering, 110943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2025.110943
43. Singh, R. K. (2025). Impact of net-zero policies on supply chain sustainability: Mediating role of green
technology adoption. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-
06-2025-0505
44. Song, H., Turson, R., Ganguly, A., & Yu, K. (2017). Evaluating the effects of supply chain quality
management on food firms’ performance. International Journal of Operations & Production
Management, 37(10), 15411562. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-11-2015-0666
45. Sreedharan, R. V. G. S., & Raju, R. (2018). Development of a Green Lean Six Sigma model for the
public sector. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 9(2), 238255. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlss-02-
2017-0020
46. Sridhar, A., Ponnuchamy, M., Kumar, P. S., Kapoor, A., Vo, D. N., & Rangasamy, G. (2023).
Digitalization of the agro-food sector to achieve sustainable development goals: a review. Sustainable
Food Technology, 1(6), 783802. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3fb00124e
47. Tchonkouang, R. D., Onyeaka, H., & Nkoutchou, H. (2024). Assessing the vulnerability of food supply
chains to climate change-induced disruption. The Science of the Total Environment, 920, 171047.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171047
48. Tjahjadi, B., Agastya, I. B. G. A., Soewarno, N., & Adyantari, A. (2022). Green human capital readiness
and business performance: Do green market orientation and green supply chain management matter?
Benchmarking an International Journal, 30(10), 38843905. https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-10-2021-0622
49. Trivedi, S., Anand, N., Sunder, R. G., & Negi, S. (2021). Developing a sustainable supply chain for
climate change-resilient agriculture in Uttarakhand, India. International Journal of Social Ecology and
Sustainable Development, 13(1), 119. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijsesd.287881
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 344
www.rsisinternational.org
50. Yadav S., Samadhiya A., Kumar A., Luthra S., Kumar V., Garza-Reyes J. A., & Upadhyay, A. (2024).
The interplay effects of digital technologies, green integration, and green innovation on food supply chain
sustainable performance: An organizational information processing theory perspective. Technology in
Society, 77, 102585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102585
51. Yadav, V. S., Singh, A., Raut, R. D., & Govindarajan, U. H. (2020). Blockchain Technology Adoption
Barriers in the Indian Agricultural Supply Chain: An Integrated Approach. Resources Conservation and
Recycling, 161, 104877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104877
52. Yu, P., Hamid, R. A., Osman, L. H., & Liao, J. (2025). Bridging the Digital Gap: Empirical Insights into
Agri-Food Supply Chain Transformation. Sustainable Futures, 10, 100810.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100810