INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 436
www.rsisinternational.org
Battery Health Monitoring and Smart Charging Slot Management in
Electric Vehicles: A Review
Jaya Prakash V
1
; Anish M
2
; Aswath M
3
; Bharath kumar T
4
1
Assistant professor, School of Mechanical, Sathyabama institute of science and technology, Chennai.
2
Assistant professor, School of Mechanical, Sathyabama institute of science and technology, Chennai.
3
Student, School of Mechanical, Sathyabama institute of science and technology, Chennai.
4
Student, School of Mechanical, Sathyabama institute of science and technology, Chennai.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.15020000039
Received: 11 February 2025; Accepted:17 February 2026; Published: 06 March 2026
ABSTRACT
The adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) has accelerated rapidly, driven by the need for sustainable mobility and
advancements in battery technologies. However, the large-scale deployment of EVs faces two key challenges:
efficient monitoring of battery health and effective management of charging infrastructure. Batteries degrade
over time, making it crucial to monitor state of charge (SOC) and state of health (SOH) to ensure safety,
reliability, and extended lifespan. At the same time, congestion at charging stations and lack of coordinated slot
allocation create bottlenecks that limit user convenience and grid stability. Recent developments in Internet of
Things (IoT) platforms, smart communication protocols, and predictive analytics provide opportunities to
integrate real-time battery health monitoring with intelligent charging slot reservation. This review paper
examines the current state of research in battery monitoring systems, SOC/SOH estimation techniques, slot
reservation algorithms, and communication technologies for EV applications. It also highlights prototype
implementations, identifies gaps in existing approaches, and outlines future directions including AI-driven
queue optimization, V2G integration, and scalable IoT architectures.
Keywords: Battery, IoT, SOC and SOH, LoRa, Slot Booking
INTRODUCTION
Electric vehicles (EVs) have become central to sustainable mobility due to their potential to reduce greenhouse
gas emissions and dependence on fossil fuels [1]. Governments and industries are promoting EV adoption
through incentives and the expansion of charging networks. However, this rapid growth has created new
challenges, particularly in charging infrastructure. Unlike traditional refueling, EV charging requires longer
durations and is constrained by the number of available stations. High adoption rates can cause overcrowding,
queuing delays, and user dissatisfaction. In urban areas, uncoordinated charging during peak hours can strain
the power grid, while uncertainty about station availability contributes to range anxiety. Addressing these issues
requires not only increasing the number of charging points but also developing intelligent slot reservation and
scheduling mechanisms [2]. Without such solutions, the rapid expansion of EVs may be hindered by
inefficiencies in the charging ecosystem.
The battery remains the most crucial component of an EV, directly impacting its performance, safety, and cost.
Monitoring parameters such as the State of Charge (SOC) and State of Health (SOH) ensures operational
efficiency while minimizing risks like overheating or deep discharge [3]. Nevertheless, charging infrastructure
availability equally affects user experience. Even if an EV can accurately assess its battery health, the lack of
accessible charging slots reduces its utility. Integrating battery monitoring with intelligent slot below a threshold,
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 437
www.rsisinternational.org
reducing waiting times and preventing service interruptions. In fleet applications, predictive battery monitoring
coupled with coordinated charging scheduling enhances operational efficiency and grid stability [4].
The Internet of Things (IoT) and communication technologies play a vital role in enabling such smart EV
ecosystems. IoT platforms allow EVs to function as connected devices, transmitting SOC and SOH data to cloud
systems for analytics and decision-making [5]. Communication technologies such as Wi-Fi, Zigbee, LoRa WAN,
and 5G enable these interactions, each offering unique advantages. LoRa supports long-range, low-power
communication suitable for fleet monitoring, while 5G delivers high-speed, low-latency data exchange ideal for
real-time charging slot allocation. Cloud platforms and dashboards built on these networks provide visibility
into vehicle health and infrastructure usage. Reliable communication thus bridges battery monitoring and
charging slot management, ensuring seamless integration [6]. This review examines advancements in battery
management, SOC/SOH estimation, IoT-enabled monitoring, and charging station scheduling. It identifies
current challenges, including cost, scalability, and lack of integration, while outlining future opportunities such
as AI-based optimization, V2G integration, and scalable IoT architectures for smart cities.
Battery Health Monitoring in Electric Vehicles
Battery Management Systems (BMS): Functions and Architecture
A Battery Management System (BMS) is the core unit responsible for monitoring and controlling the
performance of EV batteries. Its primary functions include measuring voltage, current, temperature, and SOC
of each cell, ensuring balanced charging and discharging, and providing safety mechanisms against
overcharging, deep discharge, and thermal runaway [7]. Architecturally, BMS consists of sensors, data
acquisition modules, microcontrollers, and communication interfaces that transmit battery parameters to
external systems or cloud platforms. In modern EVs, BMS not only protects the battery but also optimizes
energy usage and contributes to accurate range estimation. With the rise of connected mobility, BMS are
increasingly being designed with IoT integration, enabling real-time data sharing with external dashboards and
predictive analytics tools [8]. Despite these advancements, challenges remain, including cost, computational
complexity, and scalability for large battery packs. Research is now focusing on making BMS more intelligent,
adaptive, and compatible with smart charging networks.
Fig 2.1 Block diagram of BMS [13]
SOC & SOH Estimation Techniques
The State of Charge (SOC) and State of Health (SOH) are vital for efficient EV battery management. SOC
indicates the available capacity relative to the total and is crucial for range prediction, energy control, and
charging decisions [9]. Estimation methods include Coulomb counting, which is simple but prone to cumulative
errors, and model-based techniques like Kalman filters and Thevenin equivalent circuit models that offer better
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 438
www.rsisinternational.org
accuracy but require complex computation. Recently, machine learning and hybrid model–AI methods have
improved adaptability to nonlinear behaviors [10]. SOH reflects the battery’s condition compared to its initial
capacity, helping predict its remaining useful life (RUL). Estimation techniques include direct measurement,
model-based, and data-driven methods. Hybrid approaches combining physics-based and AI models enhance
accuracy and interpretability, though challenges remain under diverse chemistries and conditions, demanding
robust, adaptive monitoring solutions.
Fig 2.2 Battery SOH prediction framework [8]
IoT-Enabled Battery Monitoring Systems
The integration of IoT into EV battery monitoring systems has transformed the way SOC and SOH data are
collected, analyzed, and utilized. IoT-enabled BMS can transmit battery health data to cloud platforms, enabling
real-time visualization, predictive maintenance, and remote diagnostics [11]. With the use of wireless
communication protocols such as LoRa, NB-IoT, and 5G, monitoring systems can cover large fleets of EVs
while minimizing energy consumption. Cloud-based dashboards provide both users and operators with
actionable insights, such as early warnings of battery degradation or automated scheduling of charging slots
when the SOC falls below a threshold [12]. The use of edge computing further enhances these systems by
allowing real-time decision-making closer to the vehicle, reducing latency. IoT-enabled monitoring not only
improves safety and reliability but also enables integration with broader smart city infrastructures. However,
challenges such as data security, interoperability, and scalability remain significant barriers to widespread
deployment .
Limitations in Existing Battery Monitoring Approaches
Despite notable advancements, current battery monitoring approaches face several limitations. First, many SOC
and SOH estimation methods lack robustness under highly dynamic driving and charging conditions, reducing
their accuracy in real-world applications [13]. Second, model-based methods often require detailed battery
parameters and calibration, making them impractical for large-scale deployment. Third, data-driven approaches
rely on large datasets, which are not always available or standardized across different battery chemistries and
manufacturer. Additionally, IoT-enabled systems, while powerful, face issues such as cybersecurity risks, high
infrastructure costs, and limited scalability [14]. Another limitation is the lack of integration between battery
monitoring and charging management; most systems operate in isolation, preventing optimal coordination.
Finally, battery monitoring solutions must also consider computational efficiency, as EVs have constraints on
onboard processing power. Addressing these limitations requires interdisciplinary research that combines
electrochemistry, data science, IoT, and communication technologies to design adaptive, scalable, and secure
monitoring frameworks.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 439
www.rsisinternational.org
Smart Charging Slot Reservation and Queue Management
Traditional EV Charging Models
Traditional EV charging models are based on a first-come, first-served (FCFS) approach, where vehicles arrive
at charging stations and wait for availability [15]. While simple to implement, this method often leads to
inefficiencies such as long queues, unpredictable waiting times, and user dissatisfaction, especially during peak
demand [15]. FCFS models also fail to account for the urgency of charging needs, as a vehicle with critically
low SOC may wait behind one that still has sufficient range. Additionally, traditional models place unnecessary
strain on the grid, as simultaneous charging surges are not optimized. Without predictive scheduling or
reservation systems, station utilization remains suboptimal, with underuse during off-peak times and
overloading at peak hours [16]. These drawbacks highlight the need for smarter, data-driven solutions that can
dynamically allocate slots, prioritize vehicles based on SOC, and balance loads across multiple charging points.
The shift away from traditional models is critical for scaling EV infrastructure in smart cities.
Reservation-Based Charging Systems
Reservation-based charging systems aim to eliminate the uncertainty of traditional models by allowing users or
vehicles to book slots in advance . These systems leverage IoT platforms and communication protocols to enable
real-time coordination between EVs and charging stations. When the SOC of a vehicle drops below a certain
threshold, the system can automatically reserve a slot at the nearest available station, minimizing queuing time
[17]. Reservation frameworks also allow operators to optimize grid loads by scheduling charging during off-
peak periods. In practice, reservation systems have been implemented using mobile applications or vehicle-to-
infrastructure communication, giving drivers confidence that a charging point will be available upon arrival
[17]. However, challenges remain in ensuring fairness, preventing misuse of reservations, and handling no-
shows. Despite these limitations, reservation-based systems represent a significant step forward in user
convenience and charging efficiency, forming a foundation for more advanced, predictive slot allocation
mechanisms.
Fig 3.2 Computation logic of battery swapping service management [6]
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 440
www.rsisinternational.org
Queue Management and Scheduling Algorithms
Queue management is central to ensuring fair and efficient use of charging stations. Algorithms designed for
scheduling consider multiple parameters, such as SOC, arrival time, energy demand, and charging station
availability [18].
Simple approaches include FCFS with priority queuing for low-SOC vehicles, while advanced methods employ
optimization models, linear programming, or reinforcement learning [18].
Some algorithms also integrate dynamic pricing to encourage off-peak charging, thereby reducing congestion.
For fleet operators, scheduling algorithms can coordinate multiple EVs to avoid simultaneous charging,
optimizing fleet performance and minimizing downtime. Real-time scheduling supported by IoT systems
enables dynamic adjustments when demand fluctuates.
Despite progress, practical deployment faces challenges such as scalability, user compliance, and balancing
fairness with efficiency. Research continues to focus on adaptive scheduling frameworks that can respond to
diverse conditions while ensuring grid stability and user satisfaction.
Gaps in Current Charging Slot Management Solutions
Despite advancements, current charging slot management solutions face limitations. Many reservation-based
systems do not account for real-time traffic conditions or dynamic SOC levels, leading to mismatches between
reservations and actual arrivals [19].
Queue management algorithms often prioritize efficiency but neglect fairness or user-specific constraints.
Predictive models, while effective, rely heavily on accurate and large datasets, which may not always be
available in developing regions.
Moreover, interoperability across different charging networks remains limited, preventing seamless slot booking
for users traveling across regions. Cybersecurity and data privacy concerns also hinder widespread adoption, as
personal and vehicle data must be securely managed [20].
Another gap is the lack of integration between battery health monitoring and charging management, with most
systems operating independently. Bridging these gaps will require cross-disciplinary research in IoT, AI, and
communication protocols to develop more adaptive, secure, and user-centric solutions.
Communication Technologies for EY Monitoring and Charging
Wi-Fi, Zigbee, and Cellular-Based Solutions
Short- and medium-range communication protocols such as Wi-Fi, Zigbee, and cellular networks form the
foundation of IoT connectivity in EV applications. Wi-Fi offers high data rates and is well-suited for localized
monitoring in charging stations, but it consumes significant power and has limited range [21].
Zigbee, on the other hand, provides low-power, short-range communication that is cost-effective but less reliable
for large-scale EV deployment. Cellular networks, including 4G LTE, provide broader coverage and higher
reliability, making them suitable for applications that require real-time connectivity between vehicles and cloud
platforms.
However, cellular communication incurs recurring costs and may not be energy-efficient for continuous
monitoring [22]. These technologies are widely deployed in current IoT-enabled EV prototypes but are often
complemented by long-range solutions like LoRa or 5G in large-scale applications. Each has trade-offs, making
hybrid communication strategies increasingly common in EV ecosystems.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 441
www.rsisinternational.org
5G and Edge-Enabled Charging Infrastructure
The emergence of 5G networks has opened new opportunities for EV infrastructure by offering ultra-low latency,
high bandwidth, and massive device connectivity [23]. In smart charging stations, 5G enables real-time
communication between EVs, grid operators, and cloud platforms, ensuring efficient slot booking and load
balancing. When combined with edge computing, 5G allows data processing closer to the source, reducing
reliance on centralized servers and improving response times. For example, SOC and SOH data can be processed
at the edge to trigger immediate slot reservations or safety alerts [24]. This distributed approach enhances
scalability, enabling thousands of EVs to connect simultaneously without bottlenecks. 5G also supports
integration with other smart city systems, such as traffic management and renewable energy coordination. While
deployment costs are high, 5G and edge-enabled solutions represent the future of EV communication, offering
unparalleled reliability and efficiency in managing large fleets and urban charging networks.
LoRa and LoRa WAN for Low-Power Wide-Area Communication
LoRa and its networking layer, LoRa WAN, have emerged as popular solutions for long range, low-power
communication in IoT applications, including EV monitoring [25]. Unlike WIFI or cellular networks, LoRa
enables communication over several kilometers with minimal energy consumption, making it ideal for battery-
operated devices and wide-area EV fleets. In the context of EVs, LoRa can transmit SOC and SOH data to cloud
platforms or charging stations without requiring continuous cellular connectivity. LoRa WAN further enables
secure, bidirectional communication, allowing vehicles not only to send battery data but also to receive updates
such as slot reservation confirmations.
The cost-effectiveness and scalability of LoRa-based systems make them attractive for developing regions and
rural areas where cellular coverage may be limited [26]. However, LoRa is constrained by low data rates and
limited bandwidth, restricting its use for high-volume data applications. Thus, LoRa is often integrated with
other protocols in hybrid communication frameworks.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 442
www.rsisinternational.org
Comparative Analysis of Communication Protocols for EV Applications
Each communication protocol offers distinct advantages and limitations in EV applications. Wi-Fi and Zigbee
are effective for localized communication within charging stations but are limited in range and scalability [27].
Cellular networks provide wide coverage and reliable connectivity but come with higher operational costs and
power consumption. 5G, while still being rolled out globally, offers the best combination of speed, latency, and
device density, making it suitable for urban EV ecosystems [27]. LoRa and LoRa WAN, though limited in
bandwidth, excel in long-range, low-power communication and are particularly useful for fleet monitoring or
rural deployments. A comparative analysis suggests that no single protocol can address all EV communication
needs. Instead, hybrid architectures that combine protocols based on application requirements are most effective.
For example, LoRa can be used for wide-area fleet monitoring, while 5G ensures real-time slot booking in urban
centers. Such multi-protocol strategies represent the future of scalable EV communication.
Integration of Battery Monitoring with Smart Charging Systems
Existing Approaches for Integrated Solutions
Integrated solutions that combine battery monitoring with charging slot management are still in their early stages
but show significant promise. Some pilot projects connect the BMS with cloud-based charging management
platforms, allowing real-time SOC data to trigger automatic reservations. For example, if the SOC falls below
a predefined threshold, the system communicates with nearby charging stations and books a slot, reducing user
intervention [28]. Fleet operators have also experimented with integrated dashboards that combine health
diagnostics with charging logistics. However, most of these implementations are localized prototypes rather than
large-scale deployments. Interoperability remains a challenge, as different EV manufacturers use proprietary
BMS designs that are not always compatible with external slot booking systems [29]. While the technical
feasibility has been demonstrated, scaling these solutions requires standardization, robust communication
frameworks, and integration with broader smart grid systems [29]. These approaches lay the groundwork for
fully automated EV energy management in the future.
Role of Cloud Platforms and IoT Dashboards
Cloud platforms and IoT dashboards play a crucial role in bridging battery health monitoring with charging slot
reservation. By aggregating real-time SOC and SOH data from vehicles, cloud systems can analyze fleet-wide
battery performance and predict upcoming charging demand [30]. IoT dashboards present this information
visually, enabling users to monitor their vehicle health while receiving notifications about slot reservations. In
advanced systems, these dashboards also allow operators to dynamically schedule charging, allocate slots based
on priority, and coordinate with energy providers. Cloud platforms provide the scalability needed to manage
thousands of vehicles simultaneously, while edge computing ensures low latency responses for time-sensitive
operations [31]. Security and data privacy remain key concerns, as sensitive battery and location data are
continuously transmitted. Nonetheless, cloud-integrated dashboards represent a practical and user-friendly
interface for real-world deployment, enabling seamless coordination between EV monitoring and charging
infrastructure [31].
Challenges in Synchronizing Battery Health and Charging Slot Booking
Synchronizing battery monitoring with slot booking introduces several challenges. First, real time accuracy of
SOC and SOH data is crucial, as errors can lead to incorrect reservations, wasted slots, or stranded vehicles.
Second, communication latency and reliability issues can disrupt the booking process, particularly in rural or
congested networks [32]. Third, interoperability between different EV models, charging station providers, and
communication protocols is limited, making standardization critical. Another challenge lies in balancing
fairness: if multiple EVs trigger booking simultaneously, priority must be assigned without bias [32].
Cybersecurity risks also arise, as malicious attacks could manipulate reservations or disrupt charging operation.
Additionally, dynamic grid conditions must be factored into booking decisions, ensuring that power demand
aligns with availability [33]. Addressing these challenges requires cross-disciplinary approaches that integrate
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 443
www.rsisinternational.org
AI for prediction, blockchain for secure transactions, and IoT protocols for seamless communication across
diverse platforms.
Research Gaps and Opportunities
Current research has yet to fully realize integrated EV ecosystems that combine battery health monitoring with
charging slot management. Existing systems are often fragmented, focusing on either SOC/SOH estimation or
charging optimization in isolation. There is a significant opportunity to develop unified frameworks that merge
these domains into a holistic solution. Another gap lies in predictive integration: few studies explore how
forecasting battery degradation trends can inform long-term charging strategies [34]. Scalability is also an open
issue, as most prototypes address individual vehicles or small fleets rather than city-wide systems. Opportunities
exist in leveraging AI for predictive analytics, blockchain for secure reservations, and digital twins for
simulating battery–charging interactions [34]. Furthermore, integration with renewable energy and vehicle-to-
grid (V2G) frameworks could transform EVs into active participants in energy ecosystems. Bridging these
research gaps would enable the development of adaptive, resilient, and sustainable EV infrastructures.
Case Studies and Prototype Implementations
IoT-Based Battery Monitoring Prototypes
IoT-based prototypes for battery monitoring have demonstrated the feasibility of real-time data collection and
visualization in EV systems. Many academic and industry projects use low-cost microcontrollers, such as
Arduino or Raspberry Pi, connected with sensors to measure SOC, SOH, voltage, and temperature [35]. These
systems typically transmit data via WIFI, Zigbee, or LoRa to cloud platforms for visualization. Dashboards built
using platforms like Node-RED or Blynk allow users to monitor battery health remotely, receiving alerts when
SOC drops below thresholds [35]. Some prototypes integrate predictive algorithms, providing early warnings
for potential failures. While these systems are often developed at laboratory or small-scale levels, they validate
the concept of IoT-enabled monitoring. Their low cost and modularity make them suitable for rapid prototyping
and student projects. However, scalability, robustness, and cybersecurity remain significant barriers to real-
world deployment, leaving room for more advanced and standardized solutions.
Slot Booking Demonstrations for Charging Stations
Several prototypes have been developed to demonstrate charging slot booking systems using IoT and mobile
applications. These systems typically allow users to view real-time availability of charging stations and reserve
slots in advance [36]. Some incorporate automatic booking triggered by SOC thresholds, ensuring proactive
management. For instance, academic demonstrations have used MQTT protocols to facilitate communication
between EVs and charging stations, with cloud dashboards visualizing reservations [36]. Advanced prototypes
also integrate payment gateways, allowing users to book and pay simultaneously. While effective in reducing
waiting times and improving user experience, these systems often face challenges such as handling
cancellations, rescheduling, and no-shows [37]. Despite these issues, slot booking demonstrations highlight the
potential of digital platforms to streamline EV charging operations, paving the way for large-scale adoption.
LoRa-Based Energy Monitoring Applications
LoRa-based systems are particularly well-suited for energy monitoring applications due to their long-range and
low-power characteristics [38]. Several prototypes use LoRa to transmit battery health data from EVs or AGVs
(Automated Guided Vehicles) to a central monitoring station. For example, SOC and SOH data can be
transmitted across kilometers without requiring cellular infrastructure, making LoRa ideal for rural or wide-area
deployments [38]. LoRa WAN enhances this by enabling bidirectional communication, allowing vehicles to not
only send data but also receive slot booking confirmations. Academic projects have shown that LoRa can
effectively support low-data-rate applications such as SOC monitoring and slot reservation, with minimal power
overhead [39]. However, LoRa is limited in handling large datasets or real-time high-speed communication,
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 444
www.rsisinternational.org
restricting its use in data-intensive scenarios [39]. Nonetheless, LoRa remains a promising candidate for
scalable, low-cost EV monitoring systems, particularly when integrated with cloud platforms.
AGV-Based Demonstrations as EV Prototypes
Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs) are frequently used as scaled-down prototypes to simulate EV operations
in research settings. By equipping AGVs with rechargeable batteries,
IoT-enabled monitoring, and slot booking systems, researchers can replicate the behavior of EV fleets in
controlled environments. These prototypes allow testing of SOC/SOH monitoring algorithms, communication
protocols, and slot reservation mechanisms at lower cost and complexity compared to full-scale EV [40]. For
instance, an AGV can automatically book a charging slot when its battery drops below 50%, demonstrating the
feasibility of autonomous scheduling [40]. Such demonstrations provide valuable insights into system
integration, highlighting challenges such as latency, reliability, and algorithm performance. Although AGVs
cannot replicate the full complexity of EV batteries, they serve as effective testbeds for validating concepts
DISCUSSION AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Comparison of Existing Battery Monitoring Methods
Battery monitoring methods vary in complexity, accuracy, and practicality. Model-based approaches, such as
Kalman filters and equivalent circuit models, provide accurate SOC estimation but require detailed parameters
and computational resources [41]. Data-driven methods, particularly those using machine learning, offer
adaptability to diverse conditions but depend heavily on large, high-quality datasets [41]. Direct measurement
methods, while simple, are impractical for continuous monitoring in EVs. IoT-enabled systems extend these
approaches by adding connectivity and visualization capabilities but introduce concerns regarding security and
scalability [42]. A comparative analysis suggests that hybrid approaches, combining physics-based and AI-based
methods, offer the most balanced performance. Nonetheless, no single method addresses all scenarios,
highlighting the importance of adaptable, multi-layered solutions tailored to specific EV applications.
Comparison of Charging Slot Allocation Techniques
Charging slot allocation techniques differ in their efficiency and fairness. FCFS methods are easy to implement
but often lead to inefficiencies and user dissatisfaction [43]. Reservation-based systems reduce waiting times
but face challenges in handling no-shows and cancellations [43]. Queue management algorithms, including
priority scheduling, improve fairness by prioritizing low-SOC vehicles but may still lead to congestion under
high demand. Predictive coordination represents the most advanced approach, using AI to forecast demand and
optimize resource allocation [44]. However, predictive models are limited by data availability and computational
overhead. A comparative analysis suggests that combining reservation systems with predictive analytics offers
the best balance of efficiency and user satisfaction, though scalability remains a challenge for large deployments.
Analysis of Communication Technologies
Communication technologies form the backbone of integrated EV systems, each with tradeoffs. Wi-Fi and
Zigbee are suitable for localized, low-cost applications but lack scalability [45]. Cellular networks provide
reliable, wide-area connectivity but incur higher costs and energy consumption. 5G, though still emerging, offers
unparalleled performance for real-time, largescale EV management but requires significant infrastructure
investment [45].
LoRa and LoRa WAN excel in long-range, low-power applications, making them ideal for fleet monitoring and
rural deployments [46]. A comparative analysis indicates that hybrid communication frameworks, combining
short- and long-range protocols, are best suited for EV ecosystems. The choice of protocol depends on factors
such as deployment scale, latency requirements, and data volume, with no single technology sufficient for all
use cases.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 445
www.rsisinternational.org
Key Insights from Literature
The literature review highlights several key insights. First, while battery monitoring and charging slot
management have been extensively studied individually [47], integration between the two remains limited.
Second, IoT and communication technologies provide a strong foundation for integration but face challenges of
standardization, scalability, and cybersecurity. Third, predictive models and AI-driven approaches are emerging
as powerful tools for both SOC/SOH estimation and charging coordination [48], though their deployment is still
limited to prototypes. Fourth, hybrid strategies whether in monitoring methods, slot allocation, or
communication protocol consistently outperform single approaches. Finally, the use of AGV-based prototypes
and LoRa-based systems demonstrates the feasibility of low-cost, scalable solutions, though real-world
validation at scale remains lacking [49].
Future Directions
Predictive Analytics for Proactive Charging
Future EV ecosystems will increasingly rely on predictive analytics to anticipate charging demand and battery
degradation. By leveraging big data and machine learning, systems can forecast SOC decline and reserve slots
in advance, ensuring seamless operation [50]. Predictive analytics can also inform grid operators of upcoming
demand, enabling better load balancing and integration with renewable energy.
AI-Driven Queue Optimization
Artificial intelligence has the potential to revolutionize queue management by dynamically adjusting slot
allocation based on real-time conditions [51]. Reinforcement learning and neural networks can learn optimal
strategies for prioritizing vehicles, minimizing waiting times, and ensuring fairness [52].
V2G (Vehicle-to-Grid) and Renewable Energy Integration
Integrating V2G capabilities allows EVs to act as distributed energy storage units, supporting grid stability.
Coupled with renewable energy, this transforms EVs into active participants in sustainable energy ecosystems
[53].
Multi-AGV/EV Fleet Management
Large-scale fleet management will benefit from coordinated monitoring and charging strategies. Predictive
scheduling and integrated dashboards can optimize operations for logistics companies, public transport, and
shared mobility services [54].
Scalable IoT Architectures for Smart Cities
The future of EV integration lies in scalable IoT architectures that connect vehicles, charging stations, and smart
city infrastructures [55]. Standardized communication protocols, blockchain security, and edge computing will
form the backbone of these systems [56].
CONCLUSION
This review highlights the critical importance of integrating battery health monitoring with smart charging slot
management in EVs. While battery monitoring methods and slot reservation techniques have advanced
significantly, most research remains isolated. IoT and communication technologies, especially LoRa, 5G, and
cloud platforms, provide the necessary infrastructure to bridge these domains. Case studies and prototypes,
including AGV-based demonstrations, validate the feasibility of integration but highlight challenges in
scalability, interoperability, and cybersecurity. Future opportunities lie in predictive analytics, AI-driven
optimization, V2G integration, and scalable IoT systems tailored for smart cities. By addressing existing gaps
and leveraging emerging technologies, the EV ecosystem can achieve greater reliability, efficiency, and
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 446
www.rsisinternational.org
sustainability. Moreover, integrating renewable energy sources with charging infrastructure can further enhance
system efficiency and environmental benefits. Standardization of data exchange protocols and stronger
cybersecurity frameworks will also play a vital role in ensuring seamless operation and user trust across the EV
network.
REFERENCES
1. Tirshan, Y. A., Ajaikrishnan, S., & Suresh, S. (n.d.). Charging slot prediction and automation system for
electric vehicle charging station. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Engineering and
Management (IJATEM), 11391149.
2. Lanubile, A., Bosoni, P., Pozzato, G., Allam, A., Acquarone, M., & Onori, S. (2024, September). Domain
knowledge-guided machine learning framework for state of health estimation in lithium-ion batteries.
arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.14575. Retrieved from
https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.14575
3. Zhang, J., & Li, K. (2024, November). State-of-health estimation for lithium-ion batteries in hybrid
electric vehiclesA review. Energies, 17(22), Article 5753. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17225753
4. Gong, J., Xu, B., Chen, F., & Zhou, G. (2025, January). Predictive modeling for electric vehicle battery
state of health: A comprehensive literature review. Energies, 18(2), Article 337.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18020337
5. Yang, S., & Zhang, S. (2024, August). Energy balance control of multi-group lithium-ion batteries under
Internet of Things technology. IEEE Access, Article 3430318.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3430318
6. Li, X., Cao, Y., Wan, S., Liu, S., Lin, H., & Zhu, Y. (2023). A coordinated battery swapping service
management scheme based on battery heterogeneity. IEEE Transactions on Transportation
Electrification, 9(3), 44744491.
7. Martínez-Sánchez, R., Molina-García, Á., Ramallo-González, A. P., Sánchez-Valverde, J., & Úbeda-
Miñarro, B. (2023, January). A low-cost hardware architecture for EV battery cell characterization using
an IoT-based platform. Sensors, 23(2), 816. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23020816
8. Xu, Y., Zhang, Y., Yang, W., Xu, C., Wang, F., & Yang, H. (2024). A battery state of health prediction
framework considering user behavior for on-road electric vehicles. In 2024 IEEE Transportation
Electrification Conference and Expo (ITEC). IEEE.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ITEC60657.2024.10598855
9. Mas, A., Rodriguez, J. T., & Sha, M. (2025). A LoRa-based energy-harvesting sensing system for living
environment. In 2025 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Living Environment
(MetroLivEnv). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/METROLIVENV64961.2025.11107002
10. Rafique, W., Barai, J. R., Fapojuwo, A. O., & Krishnamurthy, D. (2025, February). A survey on beyond
5G network slicing for smart cities applications. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 27(1), 595.
https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2024.3410295
11. Amudhavalli, P., Zahira, R., Umashankar, S., & Fernando, X. N. (2024, August). A smart approach to
electric vehicle optimization via IoT-enabled recommender systems. Technologies, 12(8), 137.
https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies12080137
12. Ray, S., Kasturi, K., & Nayak, M. R. (2025). Multi-objective electric vehicle charge scheduling for
photovoltaic and battery energy storage based electric vehicle charging stations in distribution network.
Green Energy and Intelligent Transportation, 4, 100296.
13. Pushparaj, S., Sanjai, M., Gopalakrishnan, R., & Radhamani, R. (2024). Improving the longevity and
efficiency of electric vehicle batteries with innovative battery management technologies. In 2024 9th
International Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems (ICCES). IEEE.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCES63552.2024.10859535
14. Okubanjo, A. A., Okakwu, I. K., Okandeji, A. A., Seun, O. E., & Taiwo, O. A. (2025). Internet of
batteries: An integrated system of battery health surveillance system for electric vehicles (EVs). AUIQ
Technical Engineering Science, 2, 4260.
15. Liu, H., Li, C., Hu, X., Li, J., Zhang, K., Xie, Y., et al. (2025, January). Multi-modal framework for
battery state of health evaluation using open-source electric vehicle data. Nature Communications, 16(1),
Article 1137. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-56485-7
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 447
www.rsisinternational.org
16. Zhao, Y., Zhang, W., Ng, M., Yan, Q., Sivaneasan, B., & Xiang, C. (2024, April). Practical battery health
monitoring using uncertainty-aware Bayesian neural network. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.14444.
Retrieved from
https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.14444
17. Swarnkar, R., Ramachandran, H., Ali, S. H. M., & Jabbar, R. (2023, September). A systematic literature
review of state of health and state of charge estimation methods for batteries used in electric vehicle
applications. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 14, Article 247. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj14090247
18. Dini, P., & Paolini, D. (2025, March). Exploiting artificial neural networks for the state of charge
estimation in EV/HV battery systems: A review. Batteries, 11, Article 107.
https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries11030107
19. Jafari, S., & Byun, Y.-C. (2024, January). Efficient state of charge estimation in electric vehicles batteries
based on the extra tree regressor: A data-driven approach. Heliyon, 10(1), e25949.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25949
20. Berckmans, G., et al. (2017, September). Cost projection of state-of-the-art lithium-ion batteries for
electric vehicles up to 2030. Energies, 10(9), Article 1314. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10091314
21. pez, V., et al. (2022, July). Intelligent model for power cells state of charge forecasting in EV.
Processes, 10(7), Article 1406. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10071406
22. Yuan, H., et al. (2024, January). Planning for future EV charging infrastructure: A city-scale assessment
of demand and capacity. Energy, 301, 131635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.127814
23. Hong, S., et al. (2021, November). Real driving cycle-based state of charge prediction for EV batteries
using deep learning methods. Applied Sciences, 11(23), 11285. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311285
24. Maheshwari, A., et al. (2025, October). Real-time parameter identification and state of charge estimation
of electric vehicle batteries. Engineering Reports, 7(5), e12790. https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.12790
25. Argeshwara, D. K., Hadi, M. S., Sendari, S., & M. I. B. (2024, March). Comparative analysis of
application layer protocols in EV charging stations: Evaluating HTTP, MQTT, and WebSocket
performance metrics. Bulletin of Society Information Theory and Application, 8(1), 8696.
26. Karpenko, A., Kinnunen, T., Madhikermi, M., Robert, J., Främling, K., Dave, B., & Nurminen, A. (2018,
December). Data exchange interoperability in IoT ecosystem for smart parking and EV charging.
Sensors, 18(12), 4404. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18124404
27. Hassain, M. M., Jamil, I. H., Hoque, M. M., & Hasan, M. J. (2025, February). Electric vehicle charging
system using RFID and IoT for enhanced user experience. In Proceedings of the 2025 5th IEEE Middle
East and North Africa Communication Conference (MENACOMM) (pp. 16). IEEE.
https://doi.org/10.1109/MENACOMM62946.2025.10911013
28. Mahmoud, M., Faisal, F., Hassan, A., Mostafa, S., & Gunasekaran, S. (2025, September). Enhancing
IoV integration: The critical role of secure data transmission in IoT and electric vehicle ecosystems.
International Arab Journal of Information Technology, 22(5), 888. https://doi.org/10.34028/iajit/22/5/4
29. Dasi, S., Kuchibhatla, S. M., Ravindra, M., Kumar, K. S., Chekuri, S. S., & Kavuru, A. K. (2024, March).
IoT-based smart energy management system to meet the requirements of EV charging stations. Journal
of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 102(5).
30. Sharma, R., Garg, H., & Agrawal, C. (2025). Decentralized EV charging network with tokenized access
and adaptable scheduling. Franklin Open, 12, 100314.
31. Zalke, S., Waghmare, K., Sav, D., Chauhan, V., & Manes, G. (2024). Electric vehicle charging station
app. Kronika Journal, 24(3).
32. Li, X., Wang, C., & Huang, X. (2024). Coordinating guidance, matching, and charging station selection
for electric vehicle ride-hailing services through data-driven stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint
arXiv:2401.03300v2.
33. Tananuchittikul, W., & Chutima, P. (2025). Public charging station for electric vehicles in Thailand: A
comprehensive practical roaming service model. Engineering Journal, 29(8).
https://doi.org/10.4186/ej.2025.29.8.37
34. Goden, N. A., & Palmur, V. V. (2024, May). Charging station locator and solution for EV and CNG
vehicle. J.NXA Multidisciplinary Peer Reviewed Journal, 10(5).
35. Murugan, K., Muthusubash, M. M., Buhari, M. N., Ravichandran, R., & Dharsan, R. (n.d.). EVIOT
Futuristic automation system for electric vehicle CS charging point prediction and booking system.
Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Cyber Security (JAICS).
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 448
www.rsisinternational.org
36. Maurya, A., Kubal, V., Adhikari, Y., Sonkawade, A., & Hatkar, M. (2024, April). CHARGEEV: An EV
charging station finder bridging the gap in EV charging infrastructure. International Research Journal
of Modernization in Engineering, Technology and Science (IRJMETS), 6(4).
https://doi.org/10.56726/IRJMETS52466
37. Sun, L., Xie, C., Zhang, G., Ding, Y., Gao, Y., & Liu, J. (2025). Dual-layer real-time scheduling strategy
for electric vehicle charging and discharging in a microgrid park. Electronics, 14(2), 249.
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14020249
38. Al-Zuhairi, Y., Kannan, P., Guillén, A. B., de la Cruz Llopis, L. J., & Igartua, M. A. (2025, August).
Efficient charging station selection for minimizing total travel time of electric vehicles. Future Internet,
17, Article 374. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi17080374
39. Puneeth, P. S. P., Akash, A. P., Gagan, J. K., Deeksha, M., & Sneha, T. R. (2025, May). Smart EV station
locator and slot booking app. International Journal of Science and Innovative Engineering, 2(5), 278
284.
40. Vennala, K., Akshitha, A. R., Sai, A. J., & Ravikumar, S. (2025). IoT-based electric vehicle charging
slot reservation system. IRACST International Journal of Computer Networks and Wireless
Communications, 15(2).
41. Patil, D., Borse, L., Bachhav, D., Sonje, R., & Patil, P. (2025, May). Mobile application for EV charging
station locator and real-time slot booking. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and
Engineering Technology, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2025.69993
42. Ofoegbu, E. O. (2025, January). State of charge (SOC) estimation in electric vehicle (EV) battery
management systems using ensemble methods and neural networks. Journal of Energy Storage, 114,
115833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2024.115833
43. Rusli, M. R., Prabowo, G., Mahendra, L. S., Qudsi, O. A., et al. (2024). IoT-based real-time energy
monitoring system for ELVIRO EV. In 2024 International Electronics Symposium (IES). IEEE.
https://doi.org/10.1109/IES63037.2024.10665760
44. Krishna, G., Singh, R., Gehlot, A., Shaik, V. A., Twala, B., & Priyadarshi, N. (2024). IoT-based real-
time analysis of battery management system with long-range communication and FLoRa. Results in
Engineering, 23, 102770.
45. Karthikeyen, S., Priya, C. K., Varshini, M., Swathi, P., & Sudharsan, S. (2024, May). IoT-based wireless
battery surveillance and management system. Journal of Electronics and Information.
https://doi.org/10.3654820242.004
46. Jalgaonkar, M. G., & Wagaj, S. C. (2025, February). Real-time battery monitoring and control for EV
applications. Cuestiones de Fisioterapia, 54(3), 43914398.
47. Kartsakli, E., et al. (2024, December). Advanced edge computing architecture for AI-driven automation
and slicing in beyond 5G. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE/ACM 17th International Conference on
Utility and Cloud Computing (UCC), Sharjah, UAE. https://doi.org/10.1109/UCC63386.2024.00052
48. Feraudo, A., Calvio, A., & Bellavista, P. (2025). Simulating and validating vehicular cloud computing
applications in MEC-enabled 5G environments. JSIME Journal of Simulation Engineering, 4(1).
Retrieved from
https://articles.jsime.org/4/1
49. Koppichetti, R. K. (2021, August). The impact of edge computing on retail data engineering.
International Journal of Leading Research Publications, 2(8), 1.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14945771
50. Tabatowski-Bush, B. A. (2024). Optimization of LoRaWAN-based IoT when applied to warehouse
battery monitoring system through time serial forecasting (Doctoral dissertation, University of
MichiganDearborn).
51. Isa, A. A. H., & Iqbal, M. T. (2024). Remote low-cost web-based battery monitoring system and control
using LoRa communication technology. Journal of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 19.
52. Gomez-Huaylla, E., Mejía-Cruz, L., & Paiva-Peredo, E. (2024, September). Management and monitoring
of lithium-ion battery recharge with ESP32. International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive
Systems, 15(3), 16771686. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijpeds.v15.i3.pp1677-1686
53. Abbas, E. K., Ashraf, S., Muqadas, B., Talani, R. A., Haq, M. A. U., Rafique, M., et al. (2025, April).
Smart battery management solution for electric vehicles: Enhancing performance with advanced
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Page 449
www.rsisinternational.org
algorithms and real-time monitoring. Spectrum of Engineering Sciences, 3(4).
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15172822
54. Kunj, T., & Pal, K. (2025). Role, application, and challenges of IoT in smart EV charging management:
A review. Future Batteries, 7, 100102.
55. Sreedevi, S. L., & Geetha, B. T. (2024). Priority-based pre-booking system for efficient electric vehicle
charging station utilization. SSRN Preprint SSRN: 5086746. Retrieved from
https://ssrn.com/abstract=5086746
56. Khan, A., Hinai, M. A., Khattak, M. I., & Bait-Suwailem, M. M. (2025). Clustering-based intelligent EV
charging station selection using dynamic user requests and station status. SSRN Preprint SSRN: 5274646.
Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=5274646