Page 1179
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Assessment of Properties and the Influence on Compaction
Characteristics, Settlement Behaviour, and Hydraulic Conductivity
at Tanjung Dua Belas and Air Hitam Landfills
M Mukri, H A K Anuar *, N Khalid and A A Omar
School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, UiTM Shah Alam, 40450, Selangor, Malaysia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.15020000103
Received: 26 February 2026; Accepted: 03 March 2026; Published: 20 March 2026
ABSTRACT
This study evaluates the geotechnical characteristics of soils obtained from two landfill sites in Selangor,
Malaysia, namely Tanjung Dua Belas and Air Hitam, to determine their suitability as compacted landfill liner
materials. An integrated laboratory investigation was conducted to determine key physical properties,
compaction behaviour under varying energy levels, consolidation characteristics, and stress-dependent hydraulic
conductivity. The results reveal clear differences in engineering performance between the two soils. The Air
Hitam soil achieved higher Maximum Dry Density (MDD) values ranging from 1.832 to 1.987 g/cat lower
Optimum Moisture Contents (OMC) between 11.92% and 14.81%, demonstrating more efficient particle
packing and compaction response compared to the Tanjung Dua Belas soil, which recorded MDD values between
1.410 and 1.565 g/cm³ with higher OMC ranging from 18.56% to 22.56%. Consolidation analysis further
indicated lower settlement for Air Hitam (1.401 mm) relative to Tanjung Dua Belas (1.583 mm), reflecting
improved stiffness and reduced compressibility. Hydraulic conductivity decreased with increasing applied stress
for both soils, with Air Hitam reducing from approximately 3.07 × 10⁻cm/s to 1.47 × 10⁻cm/s, while Tanjung
Dua Belas decreased from 4.19 × 10⁻cm/s to 2.90 × 10⁻cm/s. The lower permeability and denser soil structure
observed for Air Hitam indicate improved resistance to leachate migration under landfill loading conditions.
Overall, the results demonstrate that soil physical characteristics strongly influence compaction, consolidation,
and permeability behaviour, with the Air Hitam soil showing comparatively superior suitability for engineered
landfill liner applications.
INTRODUCTION
Malaysia’s rapid population growth and industrialisation have significantly increased municipal solid waste
(MSW) generation, thereby intensifying reliance on landfilling as the primary disposal method [1]. The
performance of landfill facilities depends largely on the engineering behaviour of liner and cover materials,
where geotechnical parameters such as compaction, settlement, and hydraulic conductivity play critical roles in
maintaining structural stability and preventing environmental contamination [2]. Properly designed liner systems
must demonstrate adequate density, minimal compressibility, and low permeability to effectively restrict leachate
migration. Therefore, this study evaluates the relevant physical and engineering properties of selected soils and
examines their influence on compaction characteristics, settlement behaviour, and hydraulic conductivity in
order to establish meaningful correlations that can enhance landfill liner design and minimise environmental
risks [3]. Although numerous studies have investigated individual soil properties, limited research has addressed
the integrated relationship between physical characteristics and overall landfill engineering performance in the
Malaysian context [4]. Unlike previous studies that mainly focused on individual geotechnical properties, this
study provides an integrated evaluation of physical properties, compaction characteristics, consolidation
behaviour, and stress-dependent hydraulic conductivity for two Malaysian landfill soils, enabling a more
comprehensive assessment of landfill liner suitability under simulated loading conditions. The absence of
comprehensive data linking index properties with compaction response, consolidation behaviour, and hydraulic
performance has introduced uncertainty in predicting the long-term behaviour of landfill liner materials [5]. This
challenge is particularly significant in tropical regions such as Selangor, where fluctuations in moisture content
and variations in mineral composition may substantially alter soil behaviour under load [6]. Consequently, a
systematic assessment of the interrelationship between soil properties and engineering performance is required
Page 1180
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
to reduce design uncertainties and improve landfill management strategies. This study aims to address these gaps
by determining the physical properties of soils obtained from the Tanjung Dua Belas and Air Hitam landfill sites.
It further evaluates the compaction characteristics, consolidation behaviour, and hydraulic conductivity of the
selected samples. In addition, the study analyses the relationships between physical properties and engineering
behaviour to better understand their collective influence on landfill liner performance.
The scope of this research is limited to soil samples collected from two landfill sites in Selangor: Tanjung Dua
Belas and Air Hitam. Laboratory investigations include the determination of particle density, grain size
distribution, Atterberg limits, and pH, as well as compaction parameters such as optimum moisture content and
maximum dry density. Settlement behaviour is examined through consolidation testing, while hydraulic
conductivity is assessed using permeability tests conducted under controlled laboratory conditions. The findings
are therefore representative of laboratory-scale evaluation and may not fully replicate field-scale performance.
Furthermore, the conclusions drawn are specific to the selected landfill sites and may not be directly
generalisable to all landfill conditions in Malaysia. Nonetheless, this study provides valuable insight into the
interaction between material properties and engineering performance in landfill liner applications. While the
present investigation is limited to two landfill sites, the selected soils provide useful comparative insight into the
engineering response of tropical landfill soils under controlled laboratory conditions. The selected test
programme was designed to capture the most critical engineering parameters governing landfill liner
performance, namely compaction efficiency, settlement response, and resistance to fluid migration, while also
linking these behaviours to the fundamental physical properties of the soils.
METHODOLOGY
This investigation was carried out using residual soil samples collected from the Tanjung Dua Belas Sanitary
Landfill in Kuala Langat, Selangor, located at 2°43′53″N, 101°36′17″E, as indicated in Figure 1. The landfill has
been in operation since 2010 and handles approximately 1,000 tonnes of municipal solid waste per day.
The subsurface condition at this site is generally characterised by peat underlain by clayey and sandy silt deposits,
representing fine-grained tropical residual soils with potential relevance for landfill liner assessment. Similar
peat–clay–silt sequences have frequently been identified beneath engineered landfill sites in tropical
environments, supporting the suitability of this location for evaluating compaction response and permeability
behaviour associated with liner materials.
Figure 1. Tanjung Dua Belas Landfill (Google Maps, 2025)
Page 1181
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
The second study location was the Air Hitam Sanitary Landfill in Puchong, Selangor, situated at 3°00′21″N,
101°06′26″E, as presented in Figure 2. This landfill has been operating since 1995 and has received an estimated
6.3 million tonnes of municipal solid waste. In contrast to Tanjung Dua Belas, the subsurface conditions at Air
Hitam are associated with granitic residual soils exhibiting variable degrees of weathering and mineralogical
composition, which are characteristic of tropical geological settings. The inclusion of this site provides an
opportunity to compare two distinct residual soil profiles that are commonly encountered in landfill
environments within Selangor, thereby improving the comparative assessment of their engineering suitability
for landfill liner applications. Approximately 90 kg of soil was excavated from a depth of about 0.5 m to represent
the active zone influenced by leachate movement. The selected depth was considered appropriate to represent
the near-surface soil layer most likely to be affected by landfill leachate infiltration and environmental exposure.
Bulk disturbed samples were collected from each site to provide sufficient material for the full suite of laboratory
tests, including physical, compaction, consolidation, and hydraulic conductivity assessments. Although the study
focuses on two landfill sites, these locations were selected to represent contrasting landfill soil conditions within
Selangor. The samples were air-dried, then oven-dried at 105–110 °C for 24 hours before testing to ensure
uniform moisture conditions. All laboratory tests were performed in accordance with BS 1377:1990 and ASTM
standards to ensure consistency, accuracy, and reliability of the results. Figure 2. Air Hitam Landfill (Google
Maps, 2025)
Physical Properties Test
A series of laboratory tests were conducted to determine the basic physical properties of the collected soil
samples, including pH, particle density, particle size distribution, Atterberg limits, and shrinkage limit. The pH
value was determined using a 1:2.5 soil-to-water ratio following BS 1377-3:1990, to assess the acidity or
alkalinity of the samples. Particle density was obtained using the pycnometer method in accordance with BS
1377-2:1990. The particle size distribution was analysed through combined wet sieving and hydrometer analysis
following BS 1377-2:1990 to classify the proportions of gravel, sand, silt, and clay. The Atterberg limits,
including liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index, were determined using BS 1377-2:1990 to evaluate the
soils plasticity characteristics. The shrinkage limit was measured in accordance with BS 1377-2:1990 to assess
the potential volume change of the soil upon drying. These tests provided essential information on the
fundamental physical characteristics of the landfill soils, which are critical for evaluating their suitability in
engineering applications.
Compaction test
The compaction characteristics of soil reflect its response to external loading and moisture variations, which are
critical factors in the performance of landfill liners and covers. In this study, three compaction methods were
conducted, namely Standard Proctor Compaction (SPC), Reduced Proctor Compaction (RPC), and Modified
Proctor Compaction (MPC), in accordance with BS 1377-4:1990, as differentiated in Table 1. For each method,
Page 1182
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
soil passing through a 4.75 mm sieve was prepared, and the water content was adjusted at different intervals to
determine the Optimum Moisture Content (OMC) and Maximum Dry Density (MDD). In the Standard Proctor
Test, soil was compacted in a 1-litre mould in three layers, each subjected to 25 blows using a 2.5 kg rammer
dropped from a 300 mm height. The Reduced Proctor Test adopted the same configuration but used 15 blows
per layer to represent lighter compaction energy. The Modified Proctor Test employed a 4.5 kg rammer with a
457 mm drop height, compacting the soil in five layers of 25 blows each to replicate higher energy compaction
conditions. After compaction, the bulk and moisture contents were determined to compute dry density values,
which were plotted to establish compaction curves for comparison among the three methods.
Table 1. Sample Preparation for compaction test
Test
Procedure
Rammer (kg)
Falling Height (m)
No of blows
Compactive Effort
(kN-m/m³)
RPC
2.5
0.305
15
356.7
SPC
2.5
0.305
25
594.5
MPC
4.5
0.457
25
2700.0
Consolidation Test
The one-dimensional consolidation test was performed following BS 1377-5:1990 to examine the
compressibility behaviour of the soil samples under vertical loading. The test was carried out using an oedometer
apparatus to simulate the pressure typically exerted on landfill liner materials shown in Figure 3. A saturated
specimen was placed within a consolidation ring and sandwiched between porous stones to facilitate even
drainage. A seating pressure of 6 kPa was first applied to ensure full contact, followed by incremental loads of
12, 25, 50, 100, 200, and 400 kPa, each maintained for one hour. Deformation readings were recorded using a
dial gauge throughout the loading period. The unloading phase was conducted in two stages to assess rebound
potential. Upon completion, the specimens were oven-dried to obtain their moisture content. The Coefficient of
Consolidation (Cv) was determined using the square root of time approach, while the Compression Index (Cc)
was calculated from the linear segment of the void ratio–log pressure (e–log p) relationship. The total
consolidation settlement (Sc) was then derived based on classical consolidation theory.
Figure 3. Oedometer apparatus for consolidation test
Hydraulic Conductivity Test
The hydraulic conductivity of the soils was evaluated using a modified oedometer setup designed to simulate
vertical leachate movement under landfill-like pressure conditions shown in Figure 4. The apparatus consisted
of a standard consolidation ring connected to a constant head reservoir. Samples were compacted at their
Page 1183
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
respective OMC values, and vertical pressures of 25, 50, 100, and 200 kPa were applied to replicate field
overburden stresses. The flow rate through the saturated soil was recorded over a specified period, and hydraulic
conductivity was computed using Darcy’s law. This procedure provided an assessment of soil permeability under
controlled stress conditions, reflecting the influence of density and structure on fluid migration within landfill
materials. It should be noted that the present results were obtained under controlled laboratory conditions and
do not fully account for field-scale variability such as construction heterogeneity, climatic exposure, wet–dry
cycling, and long-term waste loading. Therefore, the engineering behaviour reported in this study should be
interpreted as indicative of comparative liner performance rather than direct field performance prediction.
Figure 4. Setup of modified oedometer test
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Physical properties of soil
The chemical condition of the investigated soils was assessed through pH testing using a 1:2.5 soil-to-water ratio
in accordance with BS 1377-3:1990. The measured values indicate that both soils exhibit strongly acidic
behaviour, which is commonly associated with landfill environments subjected to prolonged leachate exposure.
As shown in Table 2, the average pH recorded for the Tanjung Dua Belas sample was 2.81, while the Air Hitam
sample exhibited a slightly higher value of 3.65. These results classify the soils as highly to very strongly acidic.
Such acidity is typically linked to the presence of decomposed organic matter and sulphate-bearing compounds
generated from municipal solid waste degradation. Previous investigations have reported comparable acidic
characteristics in soils surrounding Malaysian landfill sites, indicating that continuous interaction with leachate
contributes significantly to reduced pH levels [7].
Similar pH conditions have also been documented at the Air Hitam landfill, confirming that acidic soil behaviour
is a common feature in active landfill environments [8]. The presence of strong acidity may influence mineral
composition, soil fabric, and long-term engineering performance, particularly in liner systems where chemical
stability and durability are essential. Therefore, although the soils exhibit chemical behaviour consistent with
other Malaysian landfill liner materials, stabilization or treatment measures may be necessary to enhance their
long-term performance and resistance to chemical degradation under aggressive landfill conditions.
Table 2. Tanjung Dua Belas and Air Hitam pH results
Tanjung Dua Belas
Air Hitam
1
2.96
3.7
2
2.79
3.66
3
2.69
3.6
Avg
2.81
3.65
Page 1184
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
The particle density of the investigated soils was determined in accordance with BS 1377-2:1990 using the small
pycnometer method to evaluate the mineralogical characteristics of the samples. The measured values indicate
variation between the two landfill sites, reflecting differences in material composition. As shown in Table 3, the
particle density of the Tanjung Dua Belas soil was 2.22 Mg/m³, whereas the Air Hitam soil recorded a higher
value of 2.48 Mg/. The relatively lower particle density at Tanjung Dua Belas may suggest the presence of
higher organic content or lighter mineral constituents within the soil matrix. This difference is important because
particle density affects the solid-phase mass per unit volume of soil, which in turn influences dry density,
compressibility, and the ability of the soil skeleton to resist deformation under loading. In contrast, the higher
particle density observed at Air Hitam implies a greater proportion of heavier mineral components, potentially
including iron oxides or denser silicate minerals. Previous studies have reported that soils containing elevated
organic matter typically exhibit reduced particle density values due to the lower specific gravity of organic
materials [9]. Comparable findings have also been documented in Malaysian landfill liner investigations, where
particle density values below 2.60 Mg/m³ were associated with organic-rich, fine-grained soils that significantly
influence compaction behaviour and settlement performance [7]. These variations in particle density are
important, as they directly affect soil compressibility, compaction response, and overall structural behaviour in
landfill liner applications.
Table 3. Tanjung Dua Belas and Air Hitam Particle Density results
Sample
Specific Gravity
ρ
w
(Mg/m³)
Particle Density (Mg/m³)
Tanjung Dua Belas
2.277
0.9982
2.223
Air Hitam
2.482
0.9982
2.478
The particle size distribution of the investigated soils was determined using combined sieve and hydrometer
analyses in accordance with BS 1377-2:1990 to evaluate their gradation characteristics and suitability for landfill
liner applications. The results indicate that both soils are predominantly fine-grained with a balanced distribution
of silt, sand, clay, and gravel fractions. As detailed in Table 4 and illustrated in Figure 5, the Tanjung Dua Belas
sample comprises 36.3% silt, 29.5% sand, 23.5% clay, and 10.7% gravel, whereas the Air Hitam sample contains
35.6% silt, 27.5% sand, 19.7% clay, and 17.2% gravel. Both soils exhibit fine contents (silt and clay fractions)
exceeding 40%, significantly surpassing the minimum 8% fine fraction required by the Ministry of Housing and
Local Government, Malaysia (MHLGM), as well as the 20% benchmark commonly recommended for landfill
liner materials [8]. The presence of substantial fine content enhances particle packing and reduces void spaces,
thereby contributing to improved compaction efficiency and lower hydraulic conductivity. Such gradation
characteristics are advantageous for landfill liner systems, where low permeability and structural stability are
essential to minimise leachate migration. Comparable particle size distributions have been reported in Malaysian
landfill investigations, where fine-grained sandy silt with well-balanced gradation was shown to improve liner
integrity and containment performance [7].
Figure 5. Tanjung Dua Belas and Air Hitam Particle Size Distribution results
Page 1185
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Table 4. Tanjung Dua Belas and Air Hitam Particle Size Distribution Summary
Tanjung Dua Belas
Air Hitam
Gravel (%)
Sand (%)
Silt (%)
Clay (%)
D
60
(mm)
D
50
(mm)
D
30
(mm) D
10
(mm)
Cu
Cg
10.70
29.50
36.30
23.50
1.260
0.540
0.250
0.015
84.00
3.31
17.20
27.50
35.60
19.70
0.175
0.140
0.062
0.002
87.50
10.98
Soil Classification
Sandy Silt
Sandy Silt
The plasticity characteristics of the investigated soils were determined in accordance with BS 1377-2:1990 to
evaluate their consistency limits and potential behaviour under varying moisture conditions. The measured
values indicate noticeable differences between the two landfill sites. As summarised in Table 5, the Tanjung Dua
Belas soil recorded a liquid limit (LL) of 39.83%, a plastic limit (PL) of 16.85%, and a plasticity index (PI) of
22.98%. In comparison, the Air Hitam soil exhibited lower values, with an LL of 24.14%, a PL of 10.75%, and
a PI of 13.39%. The relatively higher LL and PI values observed in the Tanjung Dua Belas soil suggest a greater
proportion of active clay minerals and a stronger capacity to retain water within its structure. Such behaviour is
typically associated with fine-grained soils containing higher clay content, which tend to demonstrate increased
plasticity and moisture sensitivity [9]. Conversely, the lower plasticity values measured for the Air Hitam soil
indicate a comparatively coarser composition with reduced clay fraction and improved workability. Similar
behaviour has been reported in soils with increased sand content, where reduced plasticity contributes to greater
stability and ease of compaction [2]. Although the higher plasticity of the Tanjung Dua Belas soil may enhance
cohesion, it may also increase susceptibility to deformation and shrink–swell behaviour. In contrast, the moderate
plasticity and improved stability characteristics of the Air Hitam soil suggest it may be more suitable for landfill
liner applications under Malaysian climatic conditions, where moisture variations can significantly influence
soil performance.
Table 5. Tanjung Dua Belas and Air Hitam Atterberg limit results
Sample
Liquid Limit
(LL)
Plastic Limit (PL)
Plasticity
Index (PI)
Soil Classification
Tanjung Dua Belas
39.83%
16.85%
22.98%
SILT of intermediate plasticity
Air Hitam
24.14%
10.75%
13.39%
SILT of low plasticity
The shrinkage behaviour of the investigated soils was evaluated in accordance with BS 1377-2:1990 to assess
their volumetric stability under drying conditions. The measured linear shrinkage values indicate a significant
difference between the two landfill sites. As summarised in Table 6, the Tanjung Dua Belas soil recorded a linear
shrinkage of 6.61%, whereas the Air Hitam soil exhibited a considerably lower value of 1.14%. The higher
shrinkage observed in the Tanjung Dua Belas sample reflects a greater proportion of fine particles and enhanced
water retention capacity within its soil matrix. Soils containing higher clay fractions tend to retain more moisture
within pore spaces, resulting in more pronounced volume reduction during drying. Previous research has
demonstrated that fine-grained soils are more susceptible to volumetric changes due to their ability to hold and
subsequently lose significant amounts of absorbed water [9].
Such shrinkage behaviour may increase the risk of desiccation cracking, particularly under fluctuating moisture
conditions common in tropical environments. In contrast, the substantially lower shrinkage value recorded for
the Air Hitam soil indicates improved dimensional stability and reduced susceptibility to drying-induced
Page 1186
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
cracking. For landfill liner applications, where maintaining continuity and preventing crack formation are critical
for long-term containment performance, the Air Hitam soil demonstrates more favourable behaviour.
Table 6. Tanjung Dua Belas and Air Hitam Linear Shrinkage results
Sample
Linear Shrinkage (%)
Tanjung Dua Belas
6.61
Air Hitam
1.14
Compaction characteristics of soil sample
The compaction characteristics of the investigated soils were evaluated using the Standard Proctor Compaction
(SPC) test to determine the Maximum Dry Density (MDD) and Optimum Moisture Content (OMC). These
parameters are essential for assessing the ability of soil to achieve adequate density and stability under controlled
compactive effort. The obtained results, summarised in Table 7 and illustrated through the compaction curves in
Figure 6, demonstrate distinct differences between the two landfill sites. The Air Hitam soil achieved a higher
MDD of approximately 1.88 g/cm³ at an OMC of 12.15%, whereas the Tanjung Dua Belas soil recorded a lower
MDD of 1.50 g/c at a comparatively higher OMC of 18.56%. This variation indicates that the Air Hitam soil
exhibits greater compaction efficiency and lower moisture dependency, characteristics commonly associated
with soils containing a higher proportion of granular particles. In contrast, the higher optimum moisture
requirement observed for the Tanjung Dua Belas soil reflects its finer texture and greater plasticity, which
demand more water to achieve lubrication and effective particle rearrangement during compaction. These
observations are consistent with previous studies on landfill cover materials in Malaysia, where soils with higher
sand content and reduced plasticity were reported to achieve superior compaction performance under standard
compactive effort due to improved particle interlocking and reduced moisture sensitivity [10].
Table 7. Summary of Tanjung Dua Belas and Air Hitam compaction results for SPC
Sample
Maximum Dry Density (g/c)
Optimum Moisture Content (%)
Tanjung Dua Belas
1.5
18.56
Air Hitam
1.88
12.15
Figure 6. Dry Density (g/cm³) vs Moisture Content for SPC
The compaction behaviour under reduced compactive effort was evaluated to examine the response of the soils
to lower energy input conditions, which may better represent certain field scenarios. The obtained Reduced
Proctor Compaction (RPC) results are summarised in Table 8, with the corresponding moisture–density
Page 1187
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
relationship illustrated in Figure 7. The results indicate distinct variations between the two landfill soils. For the
Air Hitam soil, the Maximum Dry Density (MDD) was approximately 1.832 g/c at an Optimum Moisture
Content (OMC) of 14.81%. In comparison, the Tanjung Dua Belas soil recorded a lower MDD of 1.410 g/cm³
at a substantially higher OMC of 22.56%. The characteristic parabolic shape of the compaction curve observed
in both cases reflects the typical soil response, where dry density increases with increasing moisture content up
to the optimum point, beyond which additional water occupies pore spaces and reduces dry density due to excess
pore water pressure. The higher density and comparatively lower moisture requirement of the Air Hitam soil
suggest a more granular texture and improved particle interlocking capability. Conversely, the higher moisture
demand of the Tanjung Dua Belas soil is consistent with its finer and more plastic composition. Similar behaviour
has been reported in laboratory studies where sandy or silty soils achieved greater compaction efficiency at lower
water contents compared to fine-grained soils with higher plasticity [3].
Table 8. Summary of Tanjung Dua Belas and Air Hitam compaction results for RPC
Sample
Maximum Dry Density (g/c)
Optimum Moisture Content (%)
Tanjung Dua Belas
1.410
22.56
Air Hitam
1.832
14.81
Figure 7. Dry Density (g/cm³) vs Moisture Content for RPC
The compaction response under increased compactive effort was further evaluated using the Modified Proctor
Compaction (MPC) test to examine the influence of higher energy input on soil densification. The obtained
results are summarised in Table 9, with the corresponding moisture–density relationship illustrated in Figure 8.
Distinct differences between the two landfill soils were observed under modified compaction conditions. The
Air Hitam sample achieved a Maximum Dry Density (MDD) of 1.987 g/cm³ at an Optimum Moisture Content
(OMC) of 11.92%, whereas the Tanjung Dua Belas soil reached a lower MDD of 1.565 g/c at a higher OMC
of 21.02%. The higher density achieved at relatively lower moisture content for the Air Hitam soil indicates a
material with lower plasticity and better particle gradation, enabling stronger interparticle bonding and improved
packing efficiency under increased compactive effort. In contrast, the Tanjung Dua Belas soil required greater
moisture content to facilitate particle rearrangement and densification, which is consistent with its finer texture
and higher plasticity characteristics. These differences demonstrate the significant influence of particle gradation
and plasticity on compaction performance. Similar observations have been reported in Malaysian landfill studies,
Page 1188
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
where effective moisture control was identified as a critical factor in achieving optimal density and long-term
structural stability of liner materials [11].
Table 9. Summary of Tanjung Dua Belas and Air Hitam compaction results for MPC
Sample
Maximum Dry Density (g/c)
Optimum Moisture Content (%)
Tanjung Dua Belas
1.565
21.02
Air Hitam
1.987
11.92
Figure 8. Dry Density (g/cm³) vs Moisture Content for MPC
A comparative evaluation of the compaction characteristics between soils obtained from Tanjung Dua Belas and
Air Hitam reveals clear differences in moisture–density response under varying compactive efforts. The detailed
comparison is presented in Figure 9, highlighting variations in Optimum Moisture Content (OMC) and
Maximum Dry Density (MDD) for both soils.
The Tanjung Dua Belas soil exhibits a higher OMC ranging from 18.56% to 22.56%, accompanied by a lower
MDD consistently below 1.600 g/cm³. In contrast, the Air Hitam soil demonstrates a comparatively lower OMC
between 12.15% and 14.81%, while achieving significantly higher MDD values ranging from approximately
1.832 g/cm³ to 1.987 g/cm³. Under compactive effort, granular particles tend to rearrange more efficiently into
a denser packing configuration, whereas soils with higher plastic fines require more water to overcome cohesive
resistance before reaching optimum densification. These variations reflect fundamental differences in soil
composition.
The Air Hitam soil, which contains a higher proportion of granular material, compacts more efficiently at lower
moisture contents due to improved particle interlocking and reduced plasticity. Conversely, the finer and more
plastic nature of the Tanjung Dua Belas soil necessitates greater moisture to facilitate particle lubrication and
rearrangement during compaction.
Across the three compaction methods, the Air Hitam soil demonstrates noticeable increases in density with
increasing compactive effort, whereas the Tanjung Dua Belas soil shows only marginal improvement between
the Standard and Modified Proctor tests. This suggests that increasing compaction energy does not substantially
enhance densification for the finer-grained soil. Additionally, both soils compacted close to the Non-Air Void
Line, indicating that the compaction procedures were effective in minimizing air voids and achieving satisfactory
density conditions representative of field applications.
Page 1189
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Figure 9. Dry Density (g/cm³) vs Moisture Content for all compaction test
Consolidation behaviour of soil sample
The consolidation behaviour of the Air Hitam soil was evaluated to assess its compressibility and settlement
characteristics under applied loading. The results, illustrated in Figure 10, indicate that the compression index
(Cc) of the sample was 0.0565, reflecting a low level of compressibility. This relatively small Cc value suggests
that the soil is comparatively dense and undergoes minimal volumetric compression when subjected to
incremental loading. Such behaviour is commonly associated with coarse-grained or low-plasticity soils, which
typically exhibit greater resistance to structural rearrangement under stress and demonstrate favourable longterm
settlement performance. The coefficient of consolidation (Cv) for the Air Hitam sample ranged between 6.467
× 10⁻⁶ m²/s and 7.030 × 10⁻m²/s. A general decreasing trend was observed as the applied vertical pressure
increased, indicating that pore-water dissipation becomes progressively slower under higher stress levels. This
behaviour reflects the reduction in void ratio and permeability as the soil structure becomes more compacted
during consolidation. The calculated settlement (Sc) was 1.401 mm, demonstrating limited compressive
deformation and consistent structural response under incremental loading. These consolidation characteristics
are likely influenced by the soil’s well-graded particle distribution, higher dry density, and lower plasticity, which
collectively enhance stability and reduce the potential for excessive post-construction settlement. Overall, the
Air Hitam soil exhibits favourable settlement behaviour for landfill liner applications, where dimensional
stability and long-term structural reliability are critical performance requirements.
Figure 10. Void Ratio vs Applied pressure for Air Hitam
Page 1190
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
The consolidation response of the Tanjung Dua Belas soil was evaluated to determine its compressibility and
settlement behaviour under incremental loading. The results, presented in Figure 11, indicate a compression
index (Cc) of 0.0797, reflecting slightly higher compressibility compared to the Air Hitam soil, although it
remains within the low-compressibility classification range. This value suggests that the soil undergoes moderate
volumetric reduction when subjected to vertical stress. The coefficient of consolidation (Cv) was measured
between 4.319 × 10⁻m²/s and 7.023 × 10⁻⁶ m²/s, with a general trend of decreasing pore-water dissipation as
the applied pressure increased. The lower Cv value of 4.319 × 10⁻m²/s is considered anomalous and may have
resulted from experimental variability or slight inconsistencies during testing. Nevertheless, the overall trend
indicates progressive reduction in permeability and drainage rate as the soil structure becomes increasingly
compressed under load. The calculated settlement (Sc) for the Tanjung Dua Belas sample was 1.583 mm, which
is slightly higher than that recorded for the Air Hitam soil, signifying a comparatively more compressible
response under similar loading conditions. This behaviour can be attributed to its higher moisture content, lower
dry density, and intermediate plasticity, factors that contribute to modest volumetric changes during
consolidation. Although the magnitude of settlement remains within acceptable limits for landfill liner
applications, it highlights the importance of proper compaction control or stabilization measures to ensure long-
term liner stability and to minimise the risk of cracking or differential settlement over time. Figure 11. Void Ratio
vs Applied pressure for Tanjung Dua Belas
The comparative settlement characteristics of the Tanjung Dua Belas and Air Hitam soils indicate generally low
compressibility for both materials, with compression index (Cc) values of 0.0797 and 0.0565, respectively. These
relatively small Cc values reflect limited primary consolidation behaviour, suggesting that both soils possess
sufficient stiffness for landfill liner applications where minimal deformation under load is required. The
coefficient of consolidation (Cv) for the Air Hitam soil ranged from 6.467 × 10⁻ m²/s to 7.030 × 10⁻ m²/s,
indicating comparatively efficient pore-water dissipation and a faster consolidation rate. In contrast, the Tanjung
Dua Belas soil recorded slightly lower values ranging from 4.319 × 10⁻⁶ m²/s to 7.023 × 10⁻⁶ m²/s, reflecting
marginally slower drainage characteristics under similar loading conditions. The total settlement (Sc) measured
for Air Hitam was 1.401 mm, whereas Tanjung Dua Belas exhibited a slightly higher settlement of 1.583 mm,
indicating comparatively greater compressibility.
Previous investigations on Malaysian landfill soils have demonstrated that low-plasticity, well-graded materials
generally exhibit reduced compressibility and improved structural stability, consistent with the trend observed
in this study [10]. Similarly, soils characterised by higher dry density and lower plasticity have been reported to
experience reduced longterm deformation in landfill containment systems [3]. The observed difference in
settlement behaviour may also be related to pore structure and particle arrangement, where denser soils with
lower plasticity generally possess a more stable load-bearing framework and smaller changes in void ratio during
compression. Overall, the Air Hitam soil demonstrates more favourable settlement behaviour, offering enhanced
dimensional stability and improved long-term reliability for engineered landfill liner applications.
Page 1191
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Hydraulic conductivity of soil sample
The hydraulic conductivity behaviour of the investigated soils was evaluated under varying applied vertical
stresses ranging from 25 kPa to 200 kPa using the modified oedometer permeability test. The measured values
demonstrate a consistent reduction in permeability with increasing applied load, reflecting the stress-dependent
response of compacted fine-grained soils. As summarised in Table 10, the decrease in hydraulic conductivity
occurs as the applied stress compresses the soil matrix, reducing void spaces and restricting the continuity of
flow channels within the pore structure. Similar stress-dependent reductions in permeability have been reported
in clay-rich soils reinforced with recycled materials, where elevated vertical stresses significantly decreased
hydraulic conductivity due to pore closure and densification effects [2]. In compacted fine-grained soils, this
reduction is associated not only with a smaller void ratio but also with decreased pore continuity and greater
tortuosity of seepage paths, which collectively lower the effective flow capacity of the soil. The inverse
relationship between applied stress and hydraulic conductivity is clearly illustrated in Figure 12, where both Air
Hitam and Tanjung Dua Belas soils exhibit progressive permeability reduction with increasing load. The Air
Hitam soil demonstrates a reduction from approximately 3.07 × 10⁻⁸ cm/s at 25 kPa to 1.47 × 10⁻⁸ cm/s at 200
kPa. In comparison, the Tanjung Dua Belas soil decreases from about 4.19 × 10⁻⁸ cm/s to 2.90 × 10⁻⁸ cm/s over
the same loading range. These results indicate that the Air Hitam soil consistently exhibits lower hydraulic
conductivity values than the Tanjung Dua Belas soil under all applied stress levels. This behaviour suggests that
the Air Hitam soil develops a denser and less permeable structure under compression, enhancing its effectiveness
as a landfill liner material. The reduced hydraulic conductivity under increased loading conditions indicates
improved resistance to leachate migration and supports its suitability for long-term containment performance
under Malaysian field conditions.
Table 10. Summary of Tanjung Dua Belas and Air Hitam hydraulic conductivity results
Load (kPa)
Air Hitam, k (cm/s)
Tanjung Dua Belas, k (cm/s)
25
50
100
200
3.074 x10
-8
2.518 x10
-8
1.990 x10
-8
1.472 x10
-8
4.194 x10
-8
3.821 x10
-8
3.370 x10
-8
2.899 x10
-8
Figure 12. Hydraulic conductivity (cm/s) vs Applied load for soil sample (kg/cm
2
)
Compaction characteristics relationship with physical properties of soil
The compaction characteristics of soils obtained from Tanjung Dua Belas and Air Hitam demonstrate a clear
relationship with their physical properties, particularly pH, particle density, plasticity, and shrinkage behaviour.
The Maximum Dry Density (MDD) for Tanjung Dua Belas ranges from 1.410 to 1.565 g/cm³ with an Optimum
Page 1192
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Moisture Content (OMC) between 20.01% and 22.56%, whereas the Air Hitam soil achieves significantly higher
MDD values ranging from 1.832 to 1.987 g/cm³ at comparatively lower OMC levels of 11.92% to 14.81%. The
higher dry density and reduced moisture demand observed for Air Hitam can be attributed to its greater particle
density (2.48 Mg/) and lower plasticity index (13.39%), which facilitate improved particle arrangement,
enhanced interparticle contact, and reduced void ratio during compaction. In contrast, the Tanjung Dua Belas
soil, characterised by lower particle density (2.22 Mg/m³) and a higher plasticity index (22.98%), requires greater
moisture to achieve its maximum density due to its finer texture and stronger cohesive forces. This behaviour is
consistent with findings that soils containing higher clay content and plasticity exhibit increased water demand
and reduced compaction efficiency [12]. The influence of pH further supports this trend, as the more acidic
Tanjung Dua Belas soil (pH 2.81) achieves lower dry density compared to the less acidic Air Hitam soil (pH
3.65). Acidic conditions can weaken particle flocculation and reduce interparticle bonding strength, thereby
limiting compaction potential [13]. Additionally, the linear shrinkage values of 6.61% for Tanjung Dua Belas
and 1.14% for Air Hitam indicate that soils with lower shrinkage tendency are more capable of forming denser
structures during compaction. Previous research has demonstrated that reduced shrinkage behaviour and lower
fines activity contribute to improved compaction performance [14]. These combined relationships are illustrated
in Figure 13, where the interaction between liquid limit, plastic limit, and linear shrinkage clearly shows that
soils with lower plasticity and shrinkage limits generally achieve higher MDD and more stable soil structures.
Overall, the results confirm that the Air Hitam soil, characterised by higher particle density, lower plasticity, and
minimal shrinkage, attains superior compaction characteristics compared to the Tanjung Dua Belas soil. This
observation is consistent with previous studies on tropical residual soils, which reported similar trends linking
physical properties to enhanced compaction performance [7].
Figure 13. Water content (%) vs Maximum Dry Density (g/cm³)
Consolidation behaviour relationship with physical properties of soil
The consolidation behaviour of the investigated soils is strongly influenced by their fundamental physical
properties, including pH, particle density, plasticity, shrinkage limit, and particle size distribution. The more
acidic Tanjung Dua Belas soil (pH 2.81) exhibits higher compressibility and settlement compared to the less
acidic Air Hitam soil (pH 3.65). Acidic conditions can weaken interparticle bonding and reduce particle
flocculation, thereby increasing susceptibility to deformation under load [13]. Particle density also plays a
significant role in governing settlement response. The denser Air Hitam soil (2.48 Mg/m³) demonstrates lower
compressibility compared to Tanjung Dua Belas (2.22 Mg/m³), consistent with findings that soils with higher
particle density generally exhibit improved resistance to volumetric compression [3]. A similar trend is observed
for shrinkage behaviour, where Tanjung Dua Belas, with a shrinkage value of 6.61%, undergoes greater
Page 1193
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
volumetric change than Air Hitam (1.44%). Higher shrinkage potential often correlates with increased
susceptibility to consolidation settlement due to structural rearrangement during moisture variation [5]. Plasticity
further influences consolidation performance. The higher plasticity index of Tanjung Dua Belas (PI 22.98%)
contributes to greater deformation compared to Air Hitam (PI 13.39%), as soils with higher plasticity typically
retain more water and exhibit stronger cohesive forces that delay drainage but promote compressibility under
sustained loading [23]. Compaction characteristics reinforce this relationship, where the Air Hitam soil,
achieving an MDD of 1.88 g/cm³ at an OMC of 12.15%, forms a denser and more stable structure compared to
Tanjung Dua Belas. Soils with higher dry density and lower plasticity are widely recognised to exhibit reduced
compressibility and improved structural stability [14]. The measured consolidation settlements further confirm
this pattern, with Tanjung Dua Belas recording 1.583 mm compared to 1.401 mm for Air Hitam. As illustrated
in Figure 14, soils compacted at lower moisture content tend to experience reduced settlement due to limited
pore-water expulsion and improved particle interlocking. Overall, the higher density and lower plasticity of the
Air Hitam soil contribute to enhanced stability and reduced compressibility compared to the Tanjung Dua Belas
soil.
Figure 14. Water content (%) vs Consolidation Settlement (mm)
Hydraulic conductivity relationship with physical properties of soil
The hydraulic conductivity behaviour of soils from Tanjung Dua Belas and Air Hitam is influenced by several
physical properties, particularly pH, maximum dry density, particle density, and moisture-related index
parameters. The measured hydraulic conductivity (k) values range between 1.47 × 10⁻⁸ cm/s and 4.19 × 10⁻
cm/s, indicating low permeability characteristics typical of compacted fine-grained soils under controlled
laboratory conditions. The more acidic Tanjung Dua Belas soil (pH 2.81) exhibits comparatively higher
hydraulic conductivity values than the less acidic Air Hitam soil (pH 3.65), suggesting that reduced acidity may
promote improved particle aggregation and stronger interparticle bonding, thereby contributing to a denser soil
structure with fewer continuous seepage paths [7]. A similar relationship is observed with respect to compaction
density. Soils achieving higher Maximum Dry Density (MDD), such as the Air Hitam soil with values reaching
1.987 g/cm³, tend to exhibit lower hydraulic conductivity due to tighter particle packing and reduced void ratio.
In contrast, the lower MDD recorded for the Tanjung Dua Belas soil (as low as 1.410 g/cm³) corresponds to
comparatively higher permeability. Particle density further supports this trend, as the higher particle density of
Air Hitam (2.48 Mg/m³) contributes to a denser mineral framework and reduced pore connectivity compared to
Tanjung Dua Belas (2.22 Mg/m³), thereby restricting water flow through the soil matrix [15]. The influence of
moisture-related soil parameters on hydraulic conductivity is illustrated in Figure 15, where higher water content
indicators correspond to increased hydraulic conductivity values. As the water content parameters increase, the
hydraulic conductivity tends to rise, indicating that soils with greater moisture retention capacity may exhibit
higher permeability under saturated conditions. This behaviour can be attributed to the influence of
watersensitive soil fabric, where increased moisture levels promote particle softening and reduce interparticle
Page 1194
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
bonding, resulting in the formation of more continuous micro-flow paths within the pore structure. Similar
observations have been reported in previous studies, which noted that soils with higher water retention
characteristics and plasticity may allow greater fluid movement when saturation weakens particle contacts and
enhances pore connectivity [2]. Overall, despite the observed increase in permeability with increasing water
content parameters, the Air Hitam soil consistently demonstrates lower hydraulic conductivity compared to the
Tanjung Dua Belas soil due to its higher density, lower plasticity, and stronger structural framework. These
characteristics contribute to improved resistance to fluid migration, confirming the comparatively better
suitability of the Air Hitam soil for landfill liner applications.
Figure 15. Water content (%) vs Hydraulic Conductivity (cm/s)
CONCLUSION
This study successfully evaluated the physical properties, compaction characteristics, consolidation behaviour,
and hydraulic conductivity of soils obtained from the Tanjung Dua Belas and Air Hitam landfill sites, fulfilling
the objectives of the research. Laboratory testing revealed notable differences in pH, particle density, shrinkage
limit, particle size distribution, plasticity index, maximum dry density, and optimum moisture content, which
collectively influenced the compaction and settlement behaviour of the soils. The Air Hitam soil exhibited higher
dry densities, lower moisture requirements, and more stable consolidation characteristics, reflecting reduced
compressibility and improved structural performance under loading.
In contrast, the Tanjung Dua Belas soil demonstrated higher plasticity, greater shrinkage potential, and finer
particle composition, resulting in higher moisture demand during compaction and slightly greater consolidation
settlement. Hydraulic conductivity evaluation indicated that both soils exhibited low permeability values ranging
from approximately 1.47 × 10⁻⁸ cm/s to 4.19 × 10cm/s, with permeability decreasing under increasing applied
stress due to soil densification and reduced pore connectivity. The Air Hitam soil consistently showed lower
hydraulic conductivity than the Tanjung Dua Belas soil, reflecting its denser soil structure and improved
resistance to fluid migration. Overall, the results indicate that the Air Hitam soil demonstrates superior
engineering performance in terms of compaction efficiency, structural stability, and hydraulic containment.
These findings highlight the strong influence of soil physical properties on engineering behaviour in landfill
liner materials.
Proper control of compaction conditions, along with potential soil treatment or stabilization using additives such
as bentonite, may further enhance liner performance by improving density and reducing permeability. Although
formal statistical modelling was not conducted due to the limited number of landfill samples, the observed trends
were consistent across all measured engineering parameters. Since the present investigation is limited to two
landfill sites and laboratory-scale testing, future research should incorporate additional representative landfill
locations, in-situ compaction verification, and long-term field monitoring to validate the laboratory observations
and improve the generalisation of the findings.
Page 1195
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
REFERENCES
1. Adunoye, G. O. (2024). Study of relationships between compaction characteristics and selected index
properties of soil. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development.
https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd63428.pdf
2. Alzara, M., Onyelowe, K. C., Ebid, A. M., Hanandeh, S., Yosri, A. M., & Alshammari, T. O. (2024).
Modeling of the effect of gradation and compaction characteristics on the California Bearing Ratio of
granular materials for subbase and landfill liner construction. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 23630.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-74106-z
3. Amadi, A. A., & Eberemu, A. O. (2012). Delineation of compaction criteria for acceptable hydraulic
conductivity of lateritic soil-bentonite mixtures designed as landfill liners. Environmental Earth
Sciences, 67(4), 999–1006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1544-z
4. Asadi, A., Huat, B. B. K., Hanafi, M. M., Mohamed, T. A., & Shariatmadari, N. (2011).
Chemicogeomechanical sensitivities of tropical peat to pore fluid pH related to controlling
electrokinetic environment. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 34(4), 481–487.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02533839.2011.576491
5. Chapuis, R. P. (2012). Predicting the saturated hydraulic conductivity of soils: A review. Bulletin of
Engineering Geology and the Environment, 71(3), 401–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-012-
0418-7
6. Dhadse, G. D., Ramtekkar, G., & Bhatt, G. (2022). Effect of particle size, moisture content and density
on the hyperbolic model parameters for non-cohesive soil. International Journal of Engineering:
Transactions B—Applications, 35(9), 1699–1706. https://doi.org/10.5829/ije.2022.35.09c.04
7. Dr. Prasanna, H. S., Harshitha, D., Singh, K., & Suhruth, S. (2017). Correlation of compaction
characteristics of fine-grained soils using Atterberg limits. International Journal of Engineering
Research and Technology, 6(6). https://doi.org/10.17577/IJERTV6IS060051
8. Emmanuel, E., Anggraini, V., Raghunandan, M. E., & Asadi, A. (2020). Utilization of marine clay as
a bottom liner material in engineered landfills. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 8(4),
104048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104048
9. EsmaeilpourShirvani, N., TaghaviGhalesari, A., Tabari, M. K., & Choobbasti, A. J. (2019).
Improvement of the engineering behavior of sand-clay mixtures using kenaf fiber
reinforcement. Transportation Geotechnics, 19, 1–8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2019.01.004
10. Khalid, U., & Rehman, Z. (2018). Evaluation of compaction parameters of fine-grained soils using
standard and modified efforts. International Journal of Geo-Engineering, 9(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40703-018-0083-1
11. Lat, D. C., Noor, S. N. A., Razali, R., Rosli, H., & Rahman, N. S. (2023). Utilization of kenaf core
fiber marine clay mixture as a landfill liner material. Jurnal Kejuruteraan, 35(1), 117–122.
http://journalarticle.ukm.my/21944/
12. Lieske, W., Sarkar, D., Goudarzy, M., & Wichtmann, T. (2024). On the impact of plastic fines on the
compaction characteristics of sand. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 42(5), 3451–3469.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-023-02738-5
13. Mishra, A. K., & Sridharan, A. (2020). A critical study on shrinkage behaviour of clays. International
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 14(1), 90–100.
https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2017.1405541
14. Mukri, M., Zainuddin, A. N., Abdullah, N. A., & Ibrahim, N. (2018). Performance of different
percentage on nano-kaolin as additives in soil liner application. Materials Today: Proceedings, 5,
2214– 7853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.02.123
15. Nath, H., Kabir, M. H., Kafy, A. A., Rahaman, Z. A., & Rahman, M. T. (2023). Geotechnical
properties and applicability of bentonite-modified local soil as landfill and environmental
sustainability liners. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 18, 100241.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2023.100241
16. Nikbakht, M., Sarand, F. B., Dabiri, R., & Hajialilue Bonab, M. (2023). Investigation of the leachate
effect on permeability and geotechnical characteristics of fine-grained soil modified using nanoclay–
nanofiber composites. Water, 15(2), 294. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15020294
Page 1196
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
17. Onyelowe, K. C., Van, D. B., & Firoozi, A. A. (2021). Shrinkage parameters of modified compacted
clayey soil for sustainable earthworks. Journal of the University Kebangsaan Malaysia, 33(1).
https://doi.org/10.17576/jkukm-2020-33(1)-13
18. Phanikumar, B. R., & Ramanjaneya Raju, E. (2020). Compaction and strength characteristics of an
expansive clay stabilised with lime sludge and cement. Soils and Foundations, 60(1), 129–138.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2020.01.007
19. Rasheed, E. W., & Atemimi, Y. K. (2025). Effect of pH value on contaminated clay soil. Scientific
Review Engineering and Environmental Sciences, 34(2), 183–197.
https://doi.org/10.22630/srees.10405
20. Rodgers, M., & Mulqueen, J. (2006). Field-saturated hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils from
falling-head well tests. Agricultural Water Management, 79(2), 160–176.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2005.02.011
21. Simarmata, D. C. V., Satomi, T., & Takahashi, H. (2022). Study on mechanical properties of cemented
soil reinforced by empty fruit bunch (EFB). International Journal of the Society of Materials
Engineering for Resources, 25(1), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.5188/ijsmer.25.109
22. Teng, J., Kou, J., Zhang, S., & Sheng, D. (2019). Evaluating the influence of specimen preparation on
saturated hydraulic conductivity using nuclear magnetic resonance technology. Vadose Zone Journal,
18(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2018.09.0179
23. Widomski, M. K., Stępniewski, W., & Musz-Pomorska, A. (2018). Clays of different plasticity as
materials for landfill liners in rural systems of sustainable waste management. Sustainability, 10(7),
2489. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072489
24. Zhang, Z., & Zhang, M. (2024). A simple model for estimating the hydraulic conductivity of
unsaturated soil. Applied Sciences, 14(3), 1254. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14031254