Page 1526
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Spider Diversity in the Vicinity of “Amakoni Reservior”, Sarangarh-
Bilaigarh District, Chhattisgarh, India
Anita Pandey1* ,Dr. V. M. Agrawal 2
Assistant Professor Kirodimal Govt. Arts and Science College, Raigarh, Chhattisgarh, India.Govt.
Navin College, Barpali, Korba, Chhattisgarh, India.
*Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.15020000133
Received: 26 February 2026; Accepted: 03 March 2026; Published: 25 March 2026
ABSTRACT
Spiders are a globally distributed group, with established populations in a wide range of habitats. The present
study aimed to investigate spider faunal diversity within "Amakoni Reservoir," Sarangarh- Bilaigarh District,
Chhattisgarh, India. This study was conducted from December 2024 to November 2025 Specimens were
collected from the environs of Amakoni Reservoir (Putka Reservoir) using a variety of collection methods and
subsequently identified using a taxonomic key for Indian spiders. This study was conducted to evaluate spider
species richness and develop a detailed species checklist for the spider fauna of the Amakoni Reservoir area A
total of 23 species, representing 8 families, were recorded from study area. The Araneidae family was the most
prevalent, comprising six species. Shannon’s Index (H)=-0.83031 and Simpson’s Index (D)= 0.8425. This
research yields significant and contemporary data regarding the species diversity within the "Amakoni
Reservoir," Sarangarh- Bilaigarh District, Chhattisgarh and may serve as a useful resource for future research on
spider fauna.
Key words- Spider, diversity, Araneidae Amakoni Reservoir, Sarangarh- Bilaigarh District.
Objectives- Objectives: This study was undertaken with the following primary objectives:
1. To assess the overall status of spider populations in the vicinity of the Amakoni reservoir.
2. To compile a comprehensive checklist of spider species identified at Amakoni reservoir.
INTRODUCTION
Spiders are fascinating creatures, they represent the most diverse and abundant group of invertebrate predators
within terrestrial ecosystems (Wise, 1993). The fossil record indicates their emergence in the Devonian period
approximately 380 million years ago (Shear et al., 1989). The current taxonomic classification recognizes 53'325
accepted species, distributed across 4391 genera within 135 families worldwide. (WSC2025 version-25) India
is home to 1,442 spider species, distributed across 59 families and 361 genera, constituting 3.6% of the world's
spider diversity, The family Salticidae exhibits the highest number of species (181), followed by Thomisidae
(154) in India. (Silwal et al.2005) Currently Singh et al. (2022) recorded 336 spider species, belonging to 136
genera and 30 families, based on surveys conducted in 36 of the 52 districts of Madhya Pradesh. Furthermore,
Singh’s book details 2,110 species within 527 genera and 55 families found in India. (Singh et al 2023). In
Chhattisgarh, 222 spider species from 96 genera of 23 families have been recorded by Choudhary et al. (2023).
Spiders are classified within the Phylum Arthropoda, Class Arachnida, order Araneae, and are exclusively
predatory organisms. Their body structure is segmented into two primary divisions: the cephalothorax and the
abdomen. Characteristically, spiders possess eight legs, which are attached to the cephalothorax. The two major
groups of spiders are Mygalomorphs, referred to as ancient spiders, and Araneomorphs, known as present day
Page 1527
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
spiders. Spiders, characterized by their eight eyes, silk secretion, and web-spinning capabilities facilitated by
spinnerets, are readily differentiated from insects.
As a dominant predator of insect pests, spiders fulfill a crucial ecological role. They contribute to the dynamic
equilibrium of micro-level food webs and represent an essential component of Integrated crop Pest Management
strategies. Spiders serve as efficient natural regulators of numerous insect-mediated diseases, including malaria
and dengue. Spiders are significant biological pest regulators and serve as a food source for birds, reptiles, and
mammals, thus maintaining the food web (Riechert & Lockley, 1984). They exhibit diverse distributions across
habitats, contingent upon site suitability, and in feeding behaviors, occupying nearly all types of ecosystems.
Spiders are a significant predatory group in terrestrial ecosystems, especially within agricultural and forest
environments (Foelix, 2011); and play a crucial role in maintaining ecological balance. They are ecologically
important for regulating insect populations (Nyffeler & Birkhofer, 2017).
Amakoni Reservoir, situated in the Amakoni village in Sarangarh–Bilaigarh district of Chhattisgarh, India.
Chhattisgarh exhibits substantial forest coverage, encompassing approximately 44.21% of its total area. The
dominant vegetation types are classified as Tropical Moist Deciduous and Tropical Dry Deciduous Forests
(Champion & Seth, 1968). The reservoir, situated within a dry deciduous forest ecosystem, provides a distinctive
interface between terrestrial and aquatic environments. The shining water body acts as a lifeline for Amakoni
villagers. During the monsoon, the reservoir brims with fresh water, reflecting the dense canopy of Sal, Bhirra,
Karra, Bija, Harra, Amla, Khair, Neem, Baheda, and Karanj, teak, and other deciduous trees that line its banks.
This ecologically significant reservoir boasts considerable natural beauty and a calming atmosphere, with its
banks supporting a wide variety of plant and animal life with spiders.
METHODOLOGY
Study Area- The current study was conducted “Amakoni Reservoir” also called "Putka Reservoir”, situated in
the Amakoni village in Sarangarh–Bilaigarh district of Chhattisgarh, India, is a tranquil waterbody encompassed
by tropical dry deciduous forests. The geographical coordinates of this area are 21° 35' 15.71'' N, 83° 4' 25.37''
W, and the elevation is 217 m (712 ft).
Page 1528
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Study Area- Amakoni Reservoir
Climate Of Study Area- The climate of a region plays a crucial role in shaping the biodiversity of its spider
population, impacting both the variety of species present and their numbers throughout the different seasons.
The town of Sarangarh is located at an altitude of 231.33 meters, which is equivalent to 758.96 feet, above the
average sea level. In terms of rainfall, Sarangarh experiences an average annual precipitation of approximately
46.69 millimetres, which translates to about 1.84 inches. This rainfall is distributed across the year, occurring on
roughly 34.92 days annually, which means that rainfall is experienced around 9.57% of the time. The overall
climate in this district is characterized by a relatively high average annual temperature, reaching about 30.28
degrees Celsius, or 86.5 degrees Fahrenheit. These climatic factors collectively influence the spider communities
found in the Sarangarh area, affecting their distribution, behavior, and overall ecological balance. The interplay
of temperature, rainfall, and altitude creates a specific environmental niche that supports certain spider species
and influences their seasonal cycles of activity and reproduction.
Sampling Method- This study was conducted across all three sessions (summer, rainy, and winter) from
December 2024 to November 2025. The following techniques were employed for specimen collection:
1. Ground-hand Collection: This method was utilized to collect spiders observed on the ground surface.
2. Aerial Hand Collection: This method was employed to collect web-building and free-living spiders from
the foliage, herbaceous plants, stems of living or dead shrubs, and tree bark.
3. Active visual surveys - Active visual surveys were conducted within the habitat to locate spiders. Specimens
were collected from ground-level and subterranean locations, as well as above-ground microhabitats,
including folded leaves, plant branches, bark, rock surfaces, and grassland, in a collection vial.
4. Litter sampling -Litter sampling involves to the gathering arachnids specifically from the litter layer of an
environment.
Photography And Identification
All spiders observed were photographed using a digital single-lens reflex (DSLR) camera and a Vivo mobile
application. Following photographic documentation, collected spiders were released back into their natural
habitats. Deceased specimens were preserved in 70% ethanol. Data regarding collected specimens, including
date and location, were recorded, and morphological features were clearly observed and documented.
Spider specimens were identified using established taxonomic keys and morphological characteristics, following
the guidelines in the published literature (Pocock, 1900; Tikader, 1975, 1987; Tikader & Malhotra, 1980; Barrion
& Litsinger, 1995; Majumder, 2004; Gajbe, 2008; Platnick, 2013; Peter & Sebastian, 2009).
Page 1529
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Calculation-
Table for calculations Biodiversity of following samples from the area: Amakoni reservoir
Number of
individuals (n)
n/N
=n/N
log

n1
n(n󰇜
30
30/137
0.219
0.65956
0.14444
29
870
14
14/137
0.1022
0.99055
0.10123
13
182
08
8/137
0.0584
1.23359
0.07204
07
56
25
25/137
0.1825
0.73874
0.13482
24
600
05
5/137
0.0365
1.43771
0.05248
04
20
28
28/137
0.2044
0.68952
0.14094
27
756
06
6/137
0.0438
1.35853
0.0595
05
30
21
21/137
0.1533
0.81446
0.12486
20
420
S (number of species) = n  2934
N (Total number of individuals) = 137,
Shannon’s Index (H) =
 log =
Simpson’s Index (D)= 1󰇛󰇜
󰇛󰇜 = 1
 = 
 = 0.8425
Plate-1- a Heteropoda venatoria, b - Telamonia dimidiate, c Leucauge decorata,- d- Phintella viata
a
a
b
c
d
Page 1530
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Percentage of Spider family in the “Amakoni reservoir”.
Table 1. Spider checklist of Putka Reservoir, (Amakoni Reservoir,) in Sarangarh–Bilaigarh district of
Chhattisgarh. -
S.N.
Family/ Genus
Species
Common name
1,
Araneidae Clerck, 1757
Argiope Savigny, 1825
Argiope aemula (Female)
(Walckenaer, 1842)
Orb- weaver spider
Argiope anasuja Thorell, 1887
Orb- weaver spider
Argiope bruennichi (Scopoli, 1772)
Orb- weaver spider
Argiope pulchella Thorell,
1881
Orb- weaver spider
Argiope trifasciata (Forskål, 1775)
Orb- weaver spider
Cyrtophora Simon, 1864
Cyrtophora cicatrosa
Garden tent-web spider
Nephila Leach, 1815
Nephila pilipes (Fabricius, 1793
golden orb-weaver.
2.
Hersiliidae Thorell, 1869
Hersilia Savigny,
1825
Hersilia savignyi Lucas, 1836
Hersilia spider.
3.
Lycosidae Sundevall, 1833
Arctosa C.L. Koch,
184
Trochosa sp.
Indian wolf
Pardosa C.L. Koch,
1847
Pardosa jabalpurensis Gajbe & Gajbe, 1999
Pardosa wolf spider.
4.
Oxyopidae Thorell, 1869
Oxyopes Latreille,
1804
Oxyopes sp.
Peucetia Thorell, 1869
Peucetia viridana (Stoliczka, 1869)
green lynx spider.
5.
Pholcidae C.L. Koch, 1850
Holocnemus Simon, 1873
Holocnemus pluchei (Scopoli, 1763)
marbled cellar spider
Page 1531
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
Pholcus Walckenaer,1805
Pholcus phalangioides(Fuesslin, 1775)
long-bodied cellar
spider,
6.
Salticidae Blackwall, 1841
Carrhotus Thorell, 1891
Carrhotus viduus (C.L. Koch, 1846)
Carrhotus jumping
spider
Chrysilla Thorell, 1887
Chrysilla volupe (Karsch, 1879)
Jumping spider
Menemerus Simon, 1868
Menemerus bivittatus
(Dufour, 1831
jumping spiders
Phintella Strand, 1906
Phintella vittata (C.L. Koch, 1846)
Phintella jumping
spiders
Plexippus C.L. Koch, 1846
Plexippus paykulli (Audouin, 1825)
Pantropical jumping
spider
Telamonia Thorell,
188
Telamonia dimidiate (Simon, 1899)
Jumping spider
7.
Sparassidae Bertkau, 1872
Heteropoda Latreille, 1804
Heteropoda venatoria (Linnaeus, 1767
Brown huntsman
Olios Walckenaer,1837
Olios lamarcki(Latreille, 1806)
Lamark’s huntsman
spider
8.
Tetragnathidae Menge, 1866
Leucauge White, 1841
Leucauge decorata(Walckenaer, 1842)
long-jawed orb weaver
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
The Amakoni reservoir supports a diverse spider population. A survey of the reservoir identified 23 spider
species, representing 8 families and 19 genera. The Araneidae family was the most abundant. The study
documented 7 species from the Araneidae, 6 from the Salticidae, and 2 each from the Lycosidae, Oxyopidae,
Pholcidae, and Sparassidae. Single species were recorded from Hersiliidae and Tetragnathidae, (Table-1) and
species richness was 0.000266 per square feet.
Leucauge decorata generally found in grassland and shrub Compared to other regions of India, comprehensive
data regarding the diversity and distribution of spiders in Chhattisgarh is limited. Pandey & Agrawal (2025)
reported a total of 32 species, representing 28 genera and 12 families, during a survey of Madosilli Waterfall,
Chhattisgarh.
The Araneidae family exhibited the highest diversity, comprising 8 species. Previous research includes Ekka,
and Kujur (2015), who documented 118 species representing 52 genera under 17 families, in Ram Jharna,
Raigarh district Chhattisgarh. A 2014 study by Khandelwal P. investigated the spider population of Saranpuri
Lake and its surrounding garden and forest areas. The survey documented 50 spiders, encompassing 7 families
and 16 species. The family Araneidae was found to be the most dominant, represented by 5 species. Parmar,
B.M; (2020) documented 142 spider species, encompassing 86 genera and 25 families, in the area surrounding
the Dharoi Reservoir, North Gujarat.
The families Araneidae and Salticidae were the most abundant, followed by Thomisidae. Subsequently, a
comprehensive survey of spider fauna across several lakes in Ved Nagar, Gujarat (Parmar; 2025), revealed a total
of 118 species. The Araneidae family was the most dominant, represented by 26 species, followed by Salticidae
with 25 species.
Oxyopidae and Thomisidae were also significantly represented. Cardoso et al. (2015) identified 37 species from
11 families in their sampling of spider diversity in highland ponds. Gupta and Chandra (2016) identified 33
species pertaining to 30 genera under 5 families in Achanakmar Wildlife Sanctuary, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India
Page 1532
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
and Sen (2021) reported a total of 55 species belonging to 42 Genus under 11 families in North East Gariaband
Forest Regions of Chhattisgarh, India.
CONCLUSION
This study represents the first investigation of Araneae diversity within the Amakoni Reservoir. It elucidates the
ecological significance of this taxonomic group, which has been historically underrepresented in regional
arachnological literature. As key predators in the food chain, spiders play a vital role in maintaining the
ecosystem. These findings offer significant utility for subsequent research, conservation strategies, and reserve
management. Based on these findings, conservation strategies should be developed to protect spider habitats and
promote biodiversity. Furthermore, this study advances the broader understanding of India’s arachnid diversity,
facilitating more informed conservation planning.
REFERENCE
1. Caleb, J.T.D. and Sankaran, P.M. 2020. Araneae of India. Version 2020, online at
http://www.indianspiders.in (accessed on 09 September 2020)
2. Cardoso et al. (2015) Habitat structure determines spider diversity in highland ponds; ecological
research,vol.32,Issue 3, pp367-379
3. Champion HG, Seth SK. A revised survey of the forest types of India. Government of India Press. 1968.
4. Choudhury, S.R.et al. (2023) Spider fauna of Chhattisgarh: An updated checklist of spiders of
Chhattisgarh, India with new additions. Serket (2024) vol. 20(3): 311-334.
Foelix RF. Biology of Spiders (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. 2011.
5. Gajbe, P. (2003). Checklist of Spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) of Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh. Zoos'
Print Journal, 18(10), 1223-1226.
6. Gupta and Chandra (2016) Diversity of Orthoptera (Insecta) fauna of Achanakmar Wildlife Sanctuary,
Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India. Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity 10(1)
7. Khandelwal P. (2014) Diversity of Spiders fauna from Sarangpuri Lake, Arvi, Vidarbha Region; Int. J.
of Life Sciences, 2014, Vol. 2(2): 165:167
8. Kujur, R., & Ekka, A. (2015). Spider diversity of Ram Jharna, Raigarh District, Chhattisgarh, India.
Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology, 8(7), 813-819.
9. Kujur, R., & Ekka, A. (2016). Incentivization of Spider fauna of Indra Vihar Park, Raigarh,
10. Chhattisgarh, India. IOSK-JESTFT, 1(2), 20-26.
11. Kujur, R., & Ekka, A. (2016). Spatial diversity of spiders of Rose Garden, Raigarh, Chhattisgarh, India.
International Journal of Advanced Research in Science and Engineering, 5(11), 139-144
12. Mishra, A.K. & Shrivastava, S.K. 2002. Spiders associated with rice crop in Raipur. Agricultural Science
Digest, 22(4): 261-263.
13. Nyffeler M, Birkhofer K. (2017) An estimated 400-800 million tons of prey are annually killed by the
global spider community. The Science of Nature.;104(3-4):30
14. Pandey & Agrawal (2025) Diversity of Spiders and Seasonal Variation Surrounding Madosilli
WaterfallSarangarh-Bilaigarh District, Chhattisgarh, India. IJRSI Volume/Issue: 12/10 | Page No: 2156-
2164
15. Parmar, Bhavesh. M., 2020. The diversity of spiders from the vicinity of Dharoi eservoir, North Gujarat,
India. Serket vol. 17(3): 194-200
16. Parmar. (2025) The Spiders Diversity from Different Lakes around Vad Nagar, North
17. Gujarat, India; International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, Vol 6, Issue 10, pp 7048-7053
October, 2025
18. Riechert SE, Lockley T. (1984) Spiders as biological control agents. Annual Review of Entomology.
29:299- 320. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.29.010184.001 503
19. Sen, D.L. 2021. Biodiversity of spider fauna at, Gariaband, Chhattisgarh, India. International Research
Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science, 3(10): 953-961.
20. Sebastian, P.A. and Peter, K.V. 2009. Spiders of India, 1st Edition. Universities Press, Hyderabad, 614pp.
Page 1533
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue II, February 2026
21. Sing et al. (2023) SPIDER FAUNA OF INDIA, (Book) ISBN- 978-81-959483-4-5
Singh and Sharma (2022) An updated checklist of spider (Araneomorphae: Araneae: Arachnida) diversity
of Madhya Pradesh, India. International Journal of Zoological Investigations 8(8):191- 218
22. Siliwal, M., Molur, S. and Biswas, B.K. 2005. Indian spiders (Arachnida: Araneae): updated checklist
2005. ZoosPrint Journal 20(10): 1999–2049.
23. Shear, W.A., Palmer, J. M., Coddington, J. A., and Bonamo, P. M. (1989). A Devonian spinneret: early
evidence of spiders and silk use. Science, 246: 479- 481.
24. Tikader, 1960 (Araneae: Thomisidae) in Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh, India. International Journal of
Research in Academic World, 3(12), 94-95.
25. Tikader, B.K. 1987. Handbook of Indian Spiders. Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta, 251pp.
26. Toppo AK., Sahu KR. & Nishad H. (2022). Diversity of Spider Fauna of Kharun River at Khutaghat
Dam, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India, International Journal Of FoodAnd Nutritional Sciences,
11(12):14170-14176
27. Wise, D.H. 1993. Spiders in Ecological Webs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
28. (WSC-2025, version-26) https://wsc.nmbe.ch/