
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue III, March 2026
For example, many hospitals across Europe processed patient data in batches during the large volume of patients
they managed due to the COVID-19 pandemic and thus, many patients who had serious medical conditions may
not have been entered into the system in a timely manner and mortality rates for some patients were higher than
normal. Additionally, many clinics in the state of Massachusetts had to handle large patient volumes from the
aftermath of the AP floods due to shortages in available health resources in the state of Massachusetts because
of the number of patients needing care during the aftermath of the flooding.Additionally, urban health care
systems have been overburdened by the large volume of e-commerce, resulting in millions of telemedicine
requests being processed every day; however, there was a significant failure of these systems during peak hours,
indicating that reliance on AI solutions will provide to be critical for those facing scalability issues [2].
Among the most prominent technical barriers that exist for using AI solutions in urban health systems are data
fragmentation and latency, which are leading to an inability to gain real-time insights or trigger alerts in a timely
manner; moreover, governance issues create potential risks in terms of biases within AI systems, privacy, and
ultimately the quality of AI. In order to be able to achieve efficient triage within the required 60 seconds and
maintain an accuracy level of at least 92 percent at over 100,000 transactions per second, as outlined in the DPDP
Act of 2023 in India, it is essential to address these issues.
Implementing governance around AI use in public health care systems is essential to ensure ethical, legal, and
secure AI systems in regards to areas like triage and prediction, and this also is aligned with frameworks that are
based on WHO, HIPAA, GDPR, and DPDP Act of India standards. The WHO has provided six principles for
healthcare AI ethics, including (1) protecting autonomy; (2) promoting well-being; (3) ensuring transparency;
(4) fostering responsibility; (5) ensuring equity; and (6) creating sustainability. The assessment of utilizing
maturity models such as HAIRA allows for scalable assessments of AI maturity beginning with ad hoc practices
to achieve leadership positions within an organization [3].
A successful detailed plan for assessing and inventorying AI assets must include model cards that provide
evidence of compliance as per the DPDP Act, integrating governance into existing workflow processes, ensuring
the security and privacy of data through automated compliance verification, and placing a priority on eliminating
equity and bias to prevent discrepancies in demographic predictions during a crisis.Regular monitoring and
accountability will support their implementation (through training, explainability tools and collaboration
between legal, development and clinical stakeholders). An example of a successful public health application is
a triage solution that reduces the likelihood of legal risk while providing high accuracy by relying on human
oversight and records of bias. To overcome challenges, organizations need to have a development road map for
training that starts with foundational maturity and grows toward greater maturity, while fostering inclusion, and
adapting to future technologies related to AI.
The primary goal of creating these AI systems is to support decision-making speed to 60 seconds or less while
achieving a predictive accuracy of 92%+, at scale, for enterprises doing 100,000 transactions/second or more.
This includes the development of scalable architecture patterns for AI based upon being able to deliver real-time
triage and predict crises events. Key initiatives will include building event-driven microservices for flexible
workloads, leveraging Operational Data Stores to perform real-time analytics, and developing ethical AI
governance to ensure fairness and compliance. Specific objectives will include creating modular architecture
patterns to include procurement data, IoT feeds, and electronic health records; establishing resiliency through
circuit breakers and Kubernetes auto-scaling to accommodate tremendously spikes in crisis events without
downtime; and demonstrating compliance with regulations such as HIPAA and GDPR through governance
activities including bias audits and model cards.
This research is focused primarily on public health applications (excluding legacy non-AI systems and non-real-
time analytics), with an emphasis on working with Python-based tools for ETL, machine learning operations,
and data visualization to perform outbreak simulations. Through this effort, the research seeks to create a
comprehensive architecture for supporting public health's modern challenges and closing the gap between AI
research and public health's practical applications. This paper provides a literature review, describes the
architectural framework for building public health systems, presents experimental results, and demonstrates the
need for resilient intelligent public health.