Page 863
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue III, March 2026
Change Management Practices and the Sustainability of Ict
Innovation Hubs in Uyo Metropolis, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria.
Columba, Nyakno Cosmas
1
, Dr. Brownson, Christabel
2
, Prof. Don, Baridam
3
Department of Business Administration Faculty of Management SciencesAkwa Ibom State University.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150300073
Received: 23 March 2026; Accepted: 28 March 2026; Published: 16 April 2026
ABSTRACT
This research was carried out to uncover the relationship between change management practices and the
sustainability of ICT Innovation Hubs in Uyo Metropolis, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. Executive support and
change communication were the dimensions of change management practices used in this study. The survey
research design was adopted for this study. The population was made up of personnel drawn from 10 identified
ICT Innovation Hubs operating within Uyo Metropolis, Akwa Ibom State making a total of 203 personnel.
Census sampling technique was adopted. 203 copies of the questionnaire were distributed to the respondents
while 200 copies were returned and used as the basis of analysis. The data collected for this study was analyzed
using the Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient (PPMC) at 0.05 level of significance using the
Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23. The findings of the study revealed that executive
support and change communication had a positive and significant relationship with organizational sustainability
at ICT Innovation Hubs in Uyo metropolis, Akwa Ibom State. It was recommended that top management should
actively participates in change initiatives by providing clear direction, necessary resources, and continuous
motivation and organizations should develop structured and transparent communication plans that engage
employees at all levels.
Keywords: Change management, change management practices, executive support, change communication,
financial sustainability, economic sustainability, environmental sustainability, ICT Innovation Hubs
INTRODUCTION
Organizations are constantly confronted with waves of disruption. Globalization, digital transformation,
regulatory changes, shifting consumer preferences, and rising social expectations are reshaping how businesses
operate. For organizations to remain competitive and future-ready, they must learn to adapt quickly while
embedding sustainability into their core strategies (McKenzie, 2022). Also organizations must be guided by
ethical standard which emphasizes on treating stakeholders with diginity(Uwa, Akpaetor & Johnson). This has
made the relationship between change management practices and organizational sustainability a central focus in
management research and practice, particularly for ICT Innovation Hubs in emerging economies such as Nigeria,
and especially in Uyo, Akwa Ibom State.
The proxies of change management practices play a critical role in driving sustainability outcomes. Leadership
commitment ensures that sustainability is not treated as an afterthought but as a core business strategy (Ahmad
& Khan, 2021).
Statement of the problem
The Information and Communication Technology (ICT) sector operates in an environment characterized by rapid
technological advancements, evolving consumer demands, and increasing regulatory pressures. To remain
competitive and ensure long-term viability, ICT firms must effectively implement change management practices
that promote sustainability. However, many organizations encounter significant challenges in this endeavour,
leading to operational inefficiencies, employee resistance, and suboptimal sustainability outcomes.
Page 864
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue III, March 2026
One major challenge is the lack of structured change management frameworks that align organizational
transformation with sustainability goals. Many ICT firms implement change initiatives without clear strategies,
leading to resistance, confusion, and failure to achieve intended outcomes (Burnes, 2019). Another critical issue
is employee resistance to change, which often arises due to fear of job displacement, inadequate communication,
and lack of participation in decision-making. Resistance can slow down or completely derail change initiatives,
affecting organizational efficiency and innovation (Armenakis & Harris, 2019).
Furthermore, the role of leadership in change management is often underestimated. Some ICT firms lack leaders
who are skilled in change management, resulting in misalignment between strategic direction and execution
(Cameron & Green, 2019). Additionally, many ICT organizations fail to integrate sustainability into their change
management practices. Without embedding sustainability into change processes, ICT firms may struggle with
regulatory compliance, ethical concerns, and reputational risks.
Given these challenges, this study sought to examine the relationship between change management practices -
such as executive support, change communication, resistance management, employee training, and technology
integration - and the sustainability in ICT firms.
Objectives of the study
The major objective of this study was to examine the relationship between change management practices and
the sustainability of ICT innovation hubs in Uyo metropolis, Akwa Ibom State. However, the specific objectives
were to:
i. examine the relationship between executive support and the sustainability of ICT innovation hubs in Uyo
metropolis, Akwa Ibom State;
ii. investigate the relationship between change communication and the sustainability of ICT innovation hubs
in Uyo metropolis, Akwa Ibom State;
Research hypotheses
The following null hypotheses formulated for this study were;
H0
1
: There is no significant relationship between executive support and the sustainability of ICT innovation
hubs in Uyo metropolis, Akwa Ibom State.
H0
2
: There is no significant relationship between change communication and the sustainability of ICT
innovation hubs in Uyo metropolis, Akwa Ibom State.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Concept of change management practices
Change is an unavoidable part of organizational life, especially in dynamic environments such as ICT innovation
hubs where technology, customer preferences, and competitive forces evolve rapidly. Organizations that fail to
adapt often face stagnation, reduced competitiveness, or even collapse. Change has therefore become a central
theme in management research, highlighting the need for effective approaches to handle transitions smoothly
and sustainably. According to Lewis (2019) change refers to any intentional modification in an organizations
structure, processes, or operations to respond to internal ambitions or external pressures. Todnem (2020) defines
change management as a structured process of guiding individuals and organizations through transitions to
achieve strategic objectives. Similarly, Iqbal and Ahmad (2022) argue that effective change management is not
only about system redesign or process improvements but also about supporting people to embrace new realities
with confidence and commitment. Taken together, these definitions emphasize that change management
practices are both technical and human in nature, requiring organizations to balance efficiency with empathy.
Page 865
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue III, March 2026
Carl (2022) argue that change management provides the necessary framework for sustaining organizational
performance during periods of transformation by aligning strategies, structures, and people. Cheruto (2024)
defined change management as the set of activities that enable employees to participate in change effortlessly
while simultaneously reducing the shock and resistance associated with the process. Employees also look
forward to fair treatment within the organization (Johnson, Emerole and Okebaram, 2024). To minimize
resistance to change, organization have to handle the processes of change management with fairness without
discriminating against any section of its workforce.
Extending this concept further, recent scholars have discussed “change management practicesas the practical
interventions and strategies organizations adopt to ensure that change is effectively executed. The need for
effective change management in organizations cannot be overstated. The rapid pace of technological innovation,
globalization, and regulatory shifts means that organizations must adapt quickly to remain competitive. Without
structured change management practices, initiatives often fail due to budget overruns, unmet deadlines, or lack
of adoption (Pacolli et al., 2022). In contrast, organizations that embrace these practices are more agile, resilient,
and better able to harness opportunities presented by change.
Dimensions of change management practices
Change management practices encompass a broad range of activities - from executive support, communication,
and resistance management to training and technology integration - that collectively enhance organizational
adaptability and sustainability.
Executive support
Executive support has been defined as the visible and sustained involvement of top leaders in driving
organizational change, providing direction, legitimacy, and resources to facilitate successful implementation.
According to Ferede (2024), executive support refers to the strategic role played by senior leaders in endorsing
change, allocating resources, and aligning initiatives with organizational goals. Similarly, Walk (2023) defined
executive support as leader change-specific behaviours - such as articulating a vision, demonstrating
commitment, and addressing employee concerns - that directly influence employees acceptance of change.
These definitions highlight that executive support goes beyond mere approval; it involves leaders acting as vision
bearers who align change initiatives with strategic priorities, communicate their importance, and model the
behaviours expected from employees. Studies further show that when executives visibly support change and
provide resources such as budgets, infrastructure, and time, the likelihood of successful outcomes increases
significantly (Heliyon, 2024).
As a critical dimension of change management practices, executive support ensures that change initiatives gain
legitimacy and are sustained across different organizational levels. Ridder et al. (2022) emphasize that
transformational leadership behaviours from executives, including role modeling and inspiring employees, help
reduce resistance and build trust during change. Similarly, findings by Akpaetor and Madubuike (2022) indicate
that senior management ought to consistently provide support to employees during periods of strategic change
by ensuring they are equipped with the essential resources needed to effectively adapt to such changes. In rapidly
evolving environments such as ICT innovation hubs, where multiple and complex changes often occur
simultaneously, executive support becomes indispensable in prioritizing initiatives, managing risks, and
facilitating technology integration. This combination of strategic guidance, resource provision, and visible
leadership makes executive support not just a facilitating factor but a decisive determinant of organizational
sustainability in the face of ongoing transformation (Emerald, 2023).
Change communication
Communication is a corner stone of change management. Johnson, Okebaram and Emerole (2024) stated that
employees who are well informed and on time about management decisions that will affect them will likely be
more willing to accept and tolerate such decisions. Change communication is widely regarded as a central
element of successful change management because it ensures that employees are informed, engaged, and aligned
Page 866
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue III, March 2026
throughout organizational transformation. Johansson and Heide (2019) defined change communication as the
planned dissemination of information that creates shared understanding of the purpose, process, and expected
outcomes of change within an organization. Similarly, Kitchen and Daly (2022) described it as a strategic process
of exchanging information between leaders and stakeholders to reduce uncertainty, foster trust, and motivate
employees to adopt new practices. These definitions highlight that change communication goes beyond the
transmission of information - it is about creating meaning, building trust, and promoting employee ownership of
change. By clearly articulating the rationale for change and using consistent messaging, organizations can bridge
the gap between leadership intentions and employee perceptions, thereby laying the foundation for smooth
transitions (Johansson & Heide, 2019; Kitchen & Daly, 2022).
As a vital dimension of change management practices, change communication plays a decisive role in shaping
employee attitudes, reducing resistance, and enhancing commitment. Communication improves employees
resilience by empowering them with the right knowledge and ability to withstand threats, uncertainties and
unexpected circumstances while still remaining dedicated to his/her job despite the change (Eketu, Edeh,
Alamina, Fern, Kumari and Johnson, 2020). Clampitt, DeKoch, and Cashman (2020) emphasize that poorly
managed communication often results in confusion, rumors, and disengagement, whereas transparent and
consistent communication builds confidence in the change process. Kotter (2021) further argues that leaders who
communicate a compelling vision and progress updates sustain momentum and strengthen alignment with
organizational goals. Moreover, Schein (2020) highlights the importance of empowering middle managers with
accurate information, as they act as intermediaries who translate strategic messages into actionable guidance for
frontline staff. Recent studies also indicate that multi-channel approaches - combining face-to-face meetings,
digital platforms, and feedback mechanisms - enhance inclusivity and ensure messages resonate with diverse
audiences (Kitchen & Daly, 2022). Taken together, these perspectives show that effective change communication
is not only about information sharing but also about fostering dialogue, trust, and shared meaning, all of which
are critical for sustaining organizational change in complex and uncertain environments.
Concept of organizational sustainability
In an era characterized by rapid technological advancements, economic volatility, and heightened environmental
concerns, organizational sustainability has emerged as a critical priority for businesses worldwide. The concept
of organizational sustainability extends beyond the traditional focus on profit and shareholder value to
encompass a broader range of economic, social, and environmental considerations. Organizational sustainability
refers to the capacity of an organization to achieve long-term success by harmonizing economic objectives with
social and environmental responsibilities. According to Rahman, et al. (2022), it entails an organization’s ability
to regulate its activities in a manner that safeguards financial strength while reducing ecological and social risks.
Florez-Jimenez, et al. (2024) further conceptualized it as the integration of profitability, social justice, and
environmental care, noting that competitiveness over time requires attention to all three aspects simultaneously.
Organizational sustainability helps businesses identify and manage risks related to social, environmental, and
economic factors (Fletcher, 2020). By adopting sustainable practices, organizations can reduce their exposure to
regulatory risks, environmental liabilities, and reputational damage. For example, companies that invest in
renewable energy and reduce their carbon footprint are better positioned to comply with environmental
regulations and avoid potential fines and penalties (Ala, et al., 2024). Also, sustainability enhances an
organization’s reputation and brand image, building trust and credibility with stakeholders. A strong reputation
for sustainability can attract customers, investors, and talent, contributing to long-term success.
Sustainability can provide a competitive advantage by differentiating an organization from its competitors
through formulation and implementation of value strategy that cannot easily be imitated or duplicated (Uwa and
Johnson, 2017). Sustainable products and services that meet customer needs while addressing environmental
and social concerns can attract environmentally conscious consumers and open new market opportunities. For
example, the rise of sustainable fashion brands that prioritize ethical sourcing and eco-friendly materials has
created a competitive edge in the fashion industry (Fletcher, 2020). Furthermore, organizational sustainability
ensures the long-term viability of a business by balancing short-term financial performance with long-term social
and environmental goals.
Page 867
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue III, March 2026
Organizational sustainability is a multidimensional concept that encompasses economic, social, and
environmental considerations. It involves balancing the need for financial performance with the responsibility
to contribute positively to society and the environment. Achieving sustainability requires organizations to adopt
practices that promote economic stability, social equity, and environmental stewardship (Ala, et al., 2024) . The
importance of organizational sustainability is underscored by its role in risk management, reputation
enhancement, competitive advantage, and long-term viability. As businesses continue to face complex challenges
in a rapidly changing world, the importance of sustainability will only increase, making it a critical factor in
achieving long-term success.
Dimensions of organizational sustainability
Organizational sustainability encompasses various key dimensions: economic, social and environmental. Each
dimension plays a vital role in ensuring the long-term success and viability of organizations as asserted by Porter
and Kramer (2021), McKenzie (2022), Hart (2019), Aguilera et al., (2019) and (Pisano, 2019).
Economic sustainability
Economic sustainability refers to the ability of an organization to generate consistent revenue, maintain
profitability, and ensure financial stability over the long term (Porter & Kramer, 2021). It involves prudent
financial management, efficient resource allocation, and the creation of value for shareholders and other
stakeholders. To achieve economic sustainability, organizations must adopt practices that enhance their financial
performance and competitiveness. This includes investing in research and development, optimizing operational
efficiency, managing costs effectively, and developing new revenue streams (McKenzie, 2022).
Social sustainability
Social sustainability refers to the impact of an organization on society and its stakeholders, including employees,
customers, suppliers, communities, and society at large (McKenzie, 2022). It involves promoting social equity,
ensuring fair labour practices, supporting community development, and contributing to the well-being of society.
Social sustainability is important because it enhances the organization's reputation, builds trust with stakeholders,
and fosters positive relationships with the community. Organizations can achieve social sustainability by
adopting practices that promote social responsibility and ethical behaviour. This includes implementing fair
labour practices, ensuring diversity and inclusion, supporting employee well-being, engaging in philanthropy,
and contributing to community development (Fletcher, 2020).
Environmental sustainability
Environmental sustainability refers to the ability of an organization to minimize its impact on the natural
environment and operate in an eco-friendly manner (Hart, 2019). It involves reducing resource consumption,
minimizing waste and emissions, conserving biodiversity, and promoting the use of renewable energy sources.
Environmental sustainability is crucial because it helps organizations mitigate environmental risks, comply with
regulations, and contribute to the preservation of natural resources for future generations. To achieve
environmental sustainability, organizations must adopt practices that reduce their environmental footprint and
promote eco-friendly behaviour. This includes implementing energy-efficient technologies, reducing greenhouse
gas emissions, adopting sustainable supply chain practices, and promoting recycling and waste reduction
(Chouinard, 2022).
Change management practices and organizational sustainability
Change is an inevitable part of any organization’s life cycle. In a world characterized by rapid technological
advancements, evolving customer expectations, regulatory shifts, and environmental challenges, organizations
must continuously adapt to survive and thrive. Change management is the systematic process of planning,
implementing, and monitoring change within an organization to achieve desired outcomes (Geada, 2021). It
involves a range of activities, including assessing the need for change, developing a change strategy,
communicating the change, managing resistance, and reinforcing new behaviours. The primary goal of change
Page 868
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue III, March 2026
management is to minimize disruption, ensure a smooth transition, and maximize the benefits of change
initiatives (Hiatt & Creasey, 2022). When effectively implemented, change management practices can
significantly contribute to organizational sustainability, ensuring that businesses remain resilient, competitive,
and capable of long-term success. Change management is crucial for organizational sustainability because it
helps organizations adapt to internal and external changes, ensuring that they remain relevant and competitive
(Carl, 2022). Effective change management enables organizations to respond to market trends, technological
advancements, regulatory requirements, and stakeholder expectations, thereby supporting long-term viability
and success.
Organizational sustainability is the ability of an organization to operate in a manner that ensures its long-term
viability while balancing economic, social, and environmental objectives (Elkington, 2024). Change
management practices play a vital role in achieving organizational sustainability by facilitating the successful
implementation of sustainable practices, fostering a culture of innovation, and enhancing organizational
resilience. One of the primary effects of change management on organizational sustainability is its ability to
facilitate the implementation of sustainable practices (Tom, 2019). Sustainable practices involve integrating
economic, social, and environmental considerations into business operations and decision-making processes
(Dyllick & Hockerts, 2022). These practices are essential for reducing the organization’s environmental
footprint, promoting social equity, and ensuring long-term financial stability. To implement sustainable practices,
organizations must often undergo significant changes in their processes, policies, and culture.
Change management practices play a pivotal role in achieving organizational sustainability by facilitating the
implementation of sustainable practices, fostering a culture of innovation, and enhancing organizational
resilience. By adopting effective change management practices, organizations can navigate the complexities of
change, adapt to evolving challenges, and create value for stakeholders. As sustainability becomes increasingly
important in the global business landscape, organizations must prioritize change management to ensure their
long-term viability and success.
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
To provide a structured understanding of change management practices, this study was anchored on Lewins
Change Model (Lewin, 1947).
Lewin’s change management model (Lewin, 1947)
Lewin's change management model was introduced by Kurt Lewin in 1947. Kurt Lewin, a German-American
psychologist. The model, which outlines the three stages of change (Unfreezing, Changing, and Refreezing).
Lewin's work laid the foundation for many subsequent theories and models in organizational change. Lewin's
model outlines three stages to facilitate this transition.
Unfreezing
This is the preparatory stage, where the existing equilibrium is disrupted. The goal is to make people aware of
the need for change, challenge existing mindsets, and create a sense of urgency. This stage involves overcoming
resistance to change and preparing individuals and the organization for transformation. The first step in the
unfreezing stage is to create awareness about the need for change. This involves communicating the reasons for
change, the potential benefits, and the risks of not changing. Leaders must effectively communicate why change
is necessary to motivate employees and stakeholders (Burnes, 2019). To unfreeze the current state, it is essential
to create a sense of urgency. This can be achieved by highlighting external pressures, such as market competition,
technological advancements, or changing customer expectations, that necessitate change (Burnes, 2019). The
unfreezing stage is critical because it lays the groundwork for change. Without this stage, there is a risk that
people will cling to the status quo, and efforts to implement change may be met with resistance or indifference.
By preparing the organization and its members for change, unfreezing helps to build a solid foundation for
successful transformation (Hussain et al., 2018).
Page 869
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue III, March 2026
Changing (or moving)
This is the transition stage, where the actual change takes place. It involves implementing new processes,
behaviours, or ways of thinking. During this stage, people begin to learn new behaviours and understand new
ways of doing things. Support, communication, and education are critical to help individuals adapt to the change
(Cummings & Worley, 2021). This stage involves putting the planned changes into action. It may include
introducing new processes, technologies, or ways of working. During the changing stage, individuals must learn
new skills, behaviours, and ways of thinking. Training and development programs, workshops, and on-the-job
learning are essential to equip employees with the necessary knowledge and skills to adapt to change. Effective
communication is vital during the changing stage to keep everyone informed about the progress of change, the
benefits, and any challenges that may arise. Providing support, such as coaching, mentoring, and counselling,
helps individuals navigate the transition and overcome any difficulties (Cummings & Worley, 2021). Involving
employees in the change process encourages ownership and commitment. Encouraging participation and
feedback helps to address concerns, build trust, and foster a sense of collaboration (Cummings & Worley, 2021).
The changing stage is where the transformation takes place. It is a critical phase because it involves moving from
the old way of doing things to the new. Successful change requires not only implementing new processes but
also changing the attitudes and behaviours of individuals. This stage is about ensuring that the change is
understood, accepted, and adopted by all members of the organization.
Refreezing
This is the final stage, where the new state is stabilized, and the change is solidified into the organizations
culture. The goal is to ensure that the new behaviours and practices are maintained over time. Reinforcement
mechanisms, such as policies, procedures, and organizational norms, are established to sustain the change
(Schein, 2020). The refreezing stage involves establishing stability after the change has been implemented. It is
essential to ensure that the new behaviours and practices become part of the organization’s culture and are not
seen as temporary measures (Schein, 2020). To sustain the change, reinforcement mechanisms are put in place.
These may include new policies, procedures, reward systems, and performance metrics that support the new way
of doing things (Schein, 2020). Continuous monitoring and feedback are essential to ensure that the change is
maintained and issues are addressed promptly. Gathering feedback from employees and stakeholders helps to
identify areas for improvement and reinforces the commitment to change. The refreezing stage is crucial for
ensuring that the change is not just a one-time event but becomes a permanent part of the organization.
The relevance of Lewin’s change management model to this research lies in its ability to explain how change
management practices influence organizational sustainability. Lewin’s model is advantageous due to its clarity
and simplicity. It is straightforward and easy to understand, making it accessible to leaders, managers, and
employees (Hussain et al., 2018). By embedding change into the organization’s culture, Lewin’s model helps to
prevent backsliding and ensures that the change is maintained (Burnes, 2019).
METHODOLOGY
The survey research design was adopted for this study. The population was made up of personnel drawn from
10 identified ICT Innovation Hubs operating within Uyo Metropolis, Akwa Ibom State. These hubs were
identified using directories from the Technology Hubs and Incubators Network (THIN) (2025) and verified
through the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) (2025), which confirms their legal registration and operational
status as business entities in Nigeria. The total population of the identified ICT innovation hubs amounted to 203
personnel. Given the relatively small and accessible population size (203), this study adopted a census approach.
The total population of 203 individuals within ICT Innovation Hubs in Uyo Metropolis, Akwa Ibom State, was
fully utilized for the study.
The study depended entirely on primary data which was obtained through a structured questionnaire that was
administered to managers, supervisors, administrative staff, and facilitators of ICT Innovation Hubs in Uyo
metropolis in Akwa Ibom State. The reliability of the instrument was established using Cronbach’s alpha method
of reliability testing. Executive support had 0.943 while change communication had 0.855 which shows a high
Page 870
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue III, March 2026
acceptable Cronbach values. In this study, both face validity and content validity were employed. This process
guaranteed that the instrument was not only appropriate on the surface but also comprehensive in capturing the
variables of interest. The data collected for this study was analyzed using the Pearson Product-Moment
Correlation Coefficient (PPMC). This statistical technique is suitable for determining the strength and direction
of the linear relationship between two continuous variables. The PPMC analysis was conducted at a 0.05 level
of significance, which is the standard threshold for determining statistical significance in social science research.
All analyses were carried out using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.
Data Presentation
The data collected were as presented as follows:
Distribution of questionnaire/response rate
Categories
Frequency
Percentage %
Copies of questionnaire administered
203
100
Copies of questionnaire filled and returned
200
99
Copies of questionnaire not returned
3
1
Source: Researcher’s field survey (2025).
From the table above, a total of 203 copies of the questionnaire were administered to respondents, representing
100% of the targeted sample. Out of these, 200 copies were duly completed and returned, giving a retrieval rate
of 99%, while only 3 copies, representing 1%, were not returned. The very high response rate indicates that the
data collected is highly representative of the sampled population and suitable for statistical analysis. A retrieval
rate above 90% is generally considered excellent in survey research, as it minimizes the risk of non-response
bias and enhances the reliability and validity of the findings. This implies that the responses analyzed in this
study provide a credible reflection of the views of the population under investigation, thereby strengthening the
generalizability of the research results.
Test of Hypotheses
Hypothesis one
H
01
: There is no significant relationship between executive support and the sustainability in ICT Innovation
Hubs in Uyo Metropolis, Akwa Ibom State.;
Correlation analysis between executive support and sustainability
Variables
Method
ES
ES
Pearson correlation
1
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
200
OS
Pearson correlation
0.911
Sig. (2-tailed)
0.000
N
200
Source: Researcher’s computation (2025).
From the table above, it was observed that the relationship between executive support and the sustainability of
ICT Innovation Hubs in Uyo Metropolis, Akwa Ibom State was 90.1%. The p-value computed showed that the
relationship between the two variables was significant. The null hypothesis which stated that there is no
significant relationship between executive support and the sustainability of ICT Innovation Hubs in Uyo
Metropolis, Akwa Ibom State was rejected and the alternative hypothesis which stated that there is significant
Page 871
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue III, March 2026
relationship between executive support and the sustainability of ICT Innovation Hubs in Uyo Metropolis, Akwa
Ibom State was accepted as p-value computed was less than 5% level of significance.
Hypothesis two
H
02
: There is no significant relationship between change communication and the sustainability of ICT Innovation
Hubs in Uyo Metropolis, Akwa Ibom State.
Correlation analysis between change communication and sustainability
Variables
Method
OS
CC
Pearson correlation
0.909
Sig. (2-tailed)
0.000
N
200
OS
Pearson correlation
1
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
200
Source: Researcher’s computation (2025).
From the table above, it was observed that the relationship between change communication and the sustainability
of ICT Innovation Hubs in Uyo Metropolis, Akwa Ibom State was 90.9%. The p-value computed showed that
the relationship between the two variables was significant. The null hypothesis which stated that there is no
significant relationship between change communication and the sustainability of ICT Innovation Hubs in Uyo
Metropolis, Akwa Ibom State was rejected and the alternative hypothesis which stated that there is significant
relationship between change communication and the sustainability of ICT Innovation Hubs in Uyo Metropolis,
Akwa Ibom State was accepted as p-value computed was less than 5% level of significance.
CONCLUSION
The study showed clearly that all aspects of change management (executive support and change communication)
contribute positively and significantly to organizational sustainability in ICT firms in Uyo metropolis. Executive
support provides the leadership and resources that guide firms through change, while effective communication
keeps everyone informed, reduces uncertainty, and builds trust among employees and stakeholders. From these
findings, it can be concluded that effective change management is a key driver of organizational sustainability.
When leadership support and open communication are deployed, organizations become more resilient,
adaptable, and forward-looking. For ICT firms in Uyo metropolis, this means not just surviving change but using
it as an opportunity to innovate, grow, and remain relevant in a competitive market. In essence, organizations
that embrace these practices are better positioned to handle future challenges and sustain long-term success.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations were made:
i. Organizations should ensure that top management actively participates in change initiatives by
providing clear direction, necessary resources, and continuous motivation. Leaders must champion
change efforts, communicate a compelling vision, and align strategic goals with sustainability
objectives to foster long-term success.
ii. Organizations should develop structured and transparent communication plans that engage
employees at all levels. Regular updates, two-way communication channels, and feedback
mechanisms should be established to address concerns and align employees with organizational
changes, thereby reducing uncertainty and fostering trust.
Page 872
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue III, March 2026
Contributions to knowledge
The contributions of this study to knowledge were as follows:
i. The research offered practical insights into how each component of change management uniquely
influences sustainability outcomes, thereby filling existing gaps in literature that often treat change
management as a monolithic concept.
ii. The study provided context-specific findings, particularly from the perspective of ICT Innovation Hubs,
contributing to regional and sectoral discourse on effective change implementation for sustained
performance.
REFERENCE
1. Aguilera, R. V., Judge, W. Q., & Terjesen, S. A. (2019). Corporate governance deviance. Academy of
Management Review, 43(1), 87–109.
2. Akpaetor, U. and Madubuike, E. (2022). Critical Success Factors and Strategic Change Management IN
Selected Deposit Money Banks in Uyo, Akwa Ibom State. AKSU Journal of Management Sciences
(AKSUJOMAS), 7(1&2): 107-120.
3. Ahmad, S., & Khan, M. (2021). Leadership and sustainable change: A review of change management
practices. Sustainability, 13(14), 7612.
4. Ala, P. A., Amah, E., & Amah, O. E. (2024). Organization design and organizational sustainability:
Theoretical perspective. African Journal of Business and Economic Development, 4(2), 45–56. Retrieved
from https://www.openjournals.ijaar.org/index.php/ajbed/article/view/578
5. Armenakis, A. A., & Harris, S. G. (2019). Reflections: Our journey in organizational change research
and practice. Journal of Change Management, 19(1), 1–20.
6. Burnes, B. (2019). Managing change (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
7. Burnes, B. (2019). Managing change (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
8. Cameron, E., & Green, M. (2019). Making sense of change management: A complete guide to the models,
tools, and techniques of organizational change (5th ed.). Kogan Page.
9. Carl, J. (2022). Change management and sustainable business transformation. Journal of Organizational
Change and Leadership, 10(1), 1–15.
10. Cheruto, L. (2024). Impact of change management on organizational performance: A case study of a
medium-sized IT organization in Sub-Saharan Africa. African Journal of Information Technology, 11(1),
25–44.
11. Chouinard, Y. (2022). Let my people go surfing: The education of a reluctant businessman (2nd ed.).
Penguin Books.
12. Clampitt, P. G., DeKoch, R. J., & Cashman, T. (2020). Embracing uncertainty: The essence of leadership.
Business Horizons, 43(5), 37–43.
13. Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2021). Organization development and change (11th ed.). Cengage
Learning.
14. Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2022). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business
Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130–141.
15. Eketu, C. A., Edeh, F. O., Alamina, U. P., Fern, Y. S., Kumari, P. and Johnson, E. E. (2020). Effects of
Organizational structure on employee resilience. Journal of Business School, 3(2), 75 - 85
16. Elkington, J. (2024). Tickling Sharks: How we sold businesses on sustainability. Fast Company Press.
17. Emerald. (2023). Cloud computing and sustainability: A systematic review. Journal of Sustainable
Business and Technology, 18(3), 215–232.
18. Ferede, W. L. (2024). Effects of strategic leadership on change management within public organizations.
Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2416613.
19. Fletcher, K. (2020). Sustainable fashion and textiles: Design journeys (2nd ed.). Routledge.
20. Florez-Jimenez, M. P., Lleo, A., Danvila-del-Valle, I., & Sánchez-Marín, G. (2024). Corporate
sustainability, organizational resilience, and corporate purpose: A review of the academic traditions
connecting them. Review of Managerial Science.
Page 873
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue III, March 2026
21. Geada, N. (2021). Change management in digital transformation: Business model concepts. In Reviving
businesses with new organizational change management strategies. Springer.
22. Hart, S. L. (2019). Capitalism at the crossroads: Next generation business strategies for a post-crisis
world (3rd ed.). Wharton School Publishing.
23. Heliyon. (2024). Leadership behavior and organizational change management in selected public
universities of Ethiopia. Heliyon, 10(7), e317805.
24. Hiatt, J., & Creasey, T. (2022). Change management: The people side of change. Prosci Learning Center
Publications.
25. Hussain, S. T., Lei, S., Akram, T., Haider, M. J., Hussain, S. H., & Ali, M. (2018). Kurt Lewin’s change
model: A critical review of the role of leadership and employee involvement in organizational change.
Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(3), 123–127.
26. Iqbal, A., & Ahmad, N. (2022). Managing change for sustainability: The role of employee engagement
and organizational culture. Journal of Cleaner Production, 365, 132846.
27. Johansson, C., & Heide, M. (2019). Speaking of change: Three communication approaches in studies of
organizational change. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 24(2), 222–240.
28. Johnson, E. E., Emerole, G. A. and Okebaram, S. M. (2024). Assessment of organizational justice
practices and employees commitment of Civil Service Commission in South-South, Nigeria.
International Journal of Economics and Business Management, 10(11). 1- 15
29. Johnson, E. E., Okebaram, S. M. and Emerole, G. A. (2024). Effect of interactional justice on employees
engagement of Civil Service Commission in South-South, Nigeria. International Journal of Social
Sciences and Management, 10(11). 1- 16
30. Kitchen, P. J., & Daly, F. (2022). Internal communication during change management: A case of strategy
and practice alignment. Journal of Communication Management, 26(1), 72–88.
31. Kotter, J. P. (2021). Change: How organizations achieve hard-to-imagine results in uncertain and volatile
times. Wiley.
32. Lewin, K.(1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept. Method and reality in Social Sciences; Social
equilibria and social change. Human Relations, 1(1), 5-41
33. Lewis, L. K. (2019). Defining organizational change. In Organizational change: Creating change through
strategic communication. Wiley-Blackwell.
34. McKenzie, S. (2022). Social sustainability: Towards some definitions. Hawke Research Institute,
University of South Australia.
35. McKenzie, S. (2022). Social sustainability: Towards some definitions. Hawke Research Institute,
University of South Australia.
36. Pacolli, M., Krasniqi, B., & Aliu, E. (2022). Importance of change management in digital transformation
sustainability. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 55(10), 3074-3081.
37. Phil, J. (2019). Executive leadership in times of change. Routledge.
38. Pisano, G. P. (2019). Creative construction: The DNA of sustained innovation. Harvard Business Review
Press.
39. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2021). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1–2), 62–
77.
40. Rahman, A., Abd Wahab, S., & Latiff, A. S. A. (2022). Definitions and concepts of organizational
sustainability: A literature analysis. Society & Sustainability, 4(1), 56–67.
41. Ridder, H.-G., Van den Heuvel, H., & Balogun, J. (2022). Leadership styles and the process of
organizational change during turbulent times. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 920495.
42. Schein, E. H. (2020). Organizational culture and leadership (6th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
43. Uwa, K. L., Akpaetor, U. A. and Johnson, E. E. (2018). Ethical compliance and organizational
profitability of Telecommunication Companies in Nigeria. European Journal of Business and innovation
Research, 6(2), 8 - 17
44. Uwa, K. L. and Johnson, E. E., (2017). Strategy implementation and organizational competitiveness in
Nigeria: A study of Akwa Ibom State Transport Company (AKTC), Uyo. AKSU Journal of Management
Sciences, 2(2), 102 – 116
45. Walk, B. (2023). Leaders as change executors: The impact of leader change-specific support on resistance
to change. Journal of Change Management, 22(3), 209–227.