Page 1494
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue III, March 2026
Implementation of Incremental Conductance MPPT in Photovoltaic
System with DC-DC Boost Converter
Sneha Jayadev Ganjihal
1
, Hemavathi R
2
, Umavathi M
3
1
PG Scholar Department of Electrical Engineering, UVCE, K R Circle Bengaluru-560001, India
2
Associate Professor, Department of Electrical Engineering, UVCE, K R Circle Bengaluru-560001, India
3
Associate Professor, Department of Electrical Engineering, BMS College of Engineering, Bengaluru-
560019, India.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150300131
Received: 04 April 2026; 09 April 2026; Published: 25 April 2026
ABSTRACT
This paper presents the implementation of Incremental Conductance (IC) Maximum Power Point Tracking
(MPPT) for photovoltaic (PV) system integrated with a DC-DC boost converter to enhance energy harvesting
efficiency. Output power varies with environmental conditions such as solar irradiance and temperature due to
the nonlinear characteristics of PV modules. To address this challenge, The IC MPPT technique is employed to
accurately track the maximum power point (MPP) under both steady-state and rapidly changing environmental
conditions. Unlike conventional methods, the incremental conductance approach determines the MPP by
comparing IC (


󰇜 with the instantaneous conductance (
), reduced oscillations and improved tracking speed.
The proposed system consists of a PV array, an IC based MPPT controller and a boost converter that steps up
the output voltage to a required level for efficient load utilization. The boost converter is controller through pulse
width modulation (PWM) signals generated by the MPPT algorithm, enabling optimal power extraction from
the PV panel. MATLAB/Simulink is used to model and simulate the system, validating its performance under
varying irradiance conditions.
Simulation outcome indicates that the IC MPPT technique achieves improved efficiency, quicker tracking of
MPP and minimizes steady-state fluctuations when compared to conventional approaches like Perturb and
Observe (P&O) method. The system ensures reliable and stable operation, making it suitable for renewable
energy applications. Overall, the integration of the IC MPPT with a boost converter significantly improves the
performance and efficiency of photovoltaic energy systems.
Keywords: Photovoltaic system, Incremental Conductance, DC-DC boost converter.
INTRODUCTION
The rapid expansion of renewable energy technologies has led to increased reliance on photovoltaic (PV) systems
for clean power generation. However, the electrical characteristics of PV modules are inherently nonlinear and
strongly influenced by environmental factors such as solar irradiance and temperature. As a result, the operating
point of a PV system varies continuously, and maximum power can only be obtained at a specific point known
as the maximum power point (MPP). If the system does not operate at this point, energy extraction becomes
inefficient. To overcome this limitation, Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) techniques are implemented
to dynamically adjust the operating conditions of the PV system. Among the available methods, the Incremental
Conductance (IC) algorithm is widely adopted due to its capability to accurately locate the MPP under both
steady-state and rapidly changing conditions. This method relies on the relationship between incremental
conductance and instantaneous conductance to determine the direction of operation, thereby reducing
oscillations and improving tracking precision.
Page 1495
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue III, March 2026
In practical PV applications, a DCDC boost converter is used to interface the PV array with the load, enabling
voltage regulation and efficient power transfer. The converter’s duty cycle is continuously controlled by the
MPPT algorithm to maintain operation at the optimal point. In this study, an enhanced IC-based MPPT strategy
is developed by incorporating adaptive decision-making and a PI-assisted control mechanism to achieve faster
convergence and improved stability. The proposed system is modeled and analyzed using MATLAB/Simulink,
and its performance is evaluated under varying environmental conditions using key indicators such as tracking
efficiency, response time, and system stability. A comparative evaluation with the conventional Perturb and
Observe (P&O) method is also included to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Several studies have focused on improving the performance of Incremental Conductance(IncCond) based MPPT
techniques for photovoltaic (PV) systems operating under dynamic environmental conditions. In [1], The
modified approach improves tracking precision by refining the decision-making mechanism under varying
irradiance and temperature, resulting in better steady-state stability and reduced power loss. The work presented
in [2] investigates the effectiveness of the IncCond method under rapidly changing atmospheric conditions. The
study demonstrates that the algorithm can accurately estimate the MPP by utilizing the slope of the PV curve,
thereby achieving improved dynamic response and reduced oscillations compared to traditional MPPT strategies.
In [3], a performance evaluation of the IncCond algorithm is carried out under fast irradiance variations. The
results indicate that while the method maintains acceptable tracking accuracy, minor steady-state oscillations
and transient delays still exist, highlighting the need for further optimization.
To overcome these issues, a variable step-size IncCond technique is introduced in [4], where the step size is
adaptively adjusted based on the operating region of the PV system. A system-level optimization is presented in
[5], where a single-stage IncCond-based MPPT is integrated with a flyback inverter topology. This configuration
reduces system complexity and improves energy conversion efficiency by eliminating intermediate conversion
stages while maintaining effective MPP tracking. Furthermore, adaptive enhancements such as step-size control
combined with holding mechanisms have been explored in [6] to suppress unnecessary perturbations near the
MPP. This method significantly improves tracking stability and reduces power fluctuations under rapidly varying
conditions. Hebchi et al. [7] proposed an improved version of the IC algorithm aimed at enhancing tracking
accuracy and reducing steady-state oscillations. Their work demonstrates better performance compared to
conventional IC, particularly during rapid changes in solar irradiance. Hemavathi et al. [8] focused on defect
detection in polycrystalline solar cells using electroluminescence imaging. Their study highlights how
identifying defects can significantly improve the reliability and efficiency of PV systems. Chawda et al. [9]
introduced a hybrid approach combining Incremental Conductance with Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) to
address the issue of multiple power peaks under partial shading conditions. The proposed method effectively
tracks the global maximum power point, overcoming the limitations of traditional IC algorithms.
Elgendy et al. [10] conducted a detailed performance analysis of the IC MPPT algorithm, emphasizing its
advantages such as accuracy and stability. However, the study also points out challenges like complexity and
slower response under certain dynamic conditions. Putri et al. [11] implemented the IC method for MPPT and
demonstrated its effectiveness in achieving stable and accurate tracking of the maximum power point. Their
results confirm that IC performs better than simpler methods like Perturb and Observe under steady-state
conditions. In another study, Hemavathi et al. [12] explored the simulation of a SEPIC DCDC converter using
LabVIEW. Their work highlights the importance of efficient power converters in PV systems, as they play a key
role in implementing MPPT algorithms effectively.
Overall, the reviewed literature indicates that although the conventional IncCond algorithm provides reliable
MPP tracking, recent advancements primarily focus on adaptive control strategies to enhance dynamic response,
minimize steady-state oscillations and improve overall system efficiency.
METHODOLOGY
The system consists of a photovoltaic (PV) array, an IC MPPT controller, a DC-DC boost converter, and a load
Page 1496
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue III, March 2026
as shown in Figure 1. The PV voltage and current are continuously measured to determine the maximum power
point using the condition


. Based on this, the IC algorithm adjusts the duty cycle to ensure optimal
power extraction with minimal oscillations. The PWM pulses control the boost converter to regulate and increase
the output voltage (V
out
) and current (I
out
). The complete system is modeled in MATLAB/Simulink to analyze
performance under varying environmental conditions.
Figure 1: Block Diagram of Proposed PV SYSTEM
PV array modelling:
The photovoltaic (PV) array is represented using a single-diode equivalent circuit, which captures the nonlinear
electrical characteristics of a solar cell. The model consists of a current source, a diode, and series (R
s
) and shunt
(R
p
) resistances to account for internal losses. The output current of the PV cell is expressed as:





where I
ph
is the photo-generated current, Io is the diode saturation current, a is the diode ideality factor and

represents the thermal voltage.
The photo-current depends on irradiance and temperature, given by:



󰇛
󰇜
Where G is the Actual irradiance, G
n
is the Nominal irradiance, T is the Cell temperature, T
n
is the Reference
temperature and K
i
is the Temperature coefficient. This equation helps to estimate the current generated by the
PV cell under different environmental conditions.
The diode reverse saturation current varies with temperature and is modeled as




Solar
PV
Array
DC-DC
Boost
Converter
Duty cycle control
(PWM)
Incremental
Conductance
MPPT
controller
Load
D
(PWM
Signal)
V
out
V
pv
, I
pv
MATLAB/Simulink
Simulation
Monitoring & Analysis
Page 1497
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue III, March 2026
Where: q = Electron charge, k = Boltzmann constant and E
g
= Bandgap energy
The diode reverse saturation current varies with temperature, As temperature increases, rises due to increased
charge carrier activity and changes in bandgap energy. This affects the performance of the PV cell, particularly
reducing the output voltage at higher temperatures.
Nominal saturation current calculation:





where,
oc
is the nominal open circuit voltage, V
t
is the nominal thermal voltage of the cell and I
sc
is the short-
circuit current. This equation helps to determine the diode parameter required for accurate PV modeling.
PV array configuration:
For practical applications, PV cells are connected in series and parallel to form an array. The array output current
is expressed as




where N
s
and N
p
represent the number of series and parallel connected modules, respectively. The total current
is obtained by scaling the single-cell current, while the diode and resistive effects are adjusted based on the array
configuration. This equation models the overall behavior of the PV array under different operating conditions.
Table 1: PV Array Specifications
PARAMETER
SYMBOL
VALUE
Irradiance
G
1000W/m
2
Temperature
T
25
o
C
Voltage at MPP
V
mp
24 V
Current at MPP
I
mp
9 A
Open circuit
voltage
V
oc
32 V
Short circuit
current
I
sc
9.5 A
Maximum Power
P
max
216 W
Series resistance
R
s
0.48 ohm
Shunt Resistance
R
sh
678 ohm
Diode ideality
factor
a
0.86
Saturation Current
I
o
3.254×10
-10
A
Photo current
I
ph
9.64 A
MPPT Control Using Incremental Conductance Method
Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) is essential for maximizing energy extraction from photovoltaic (PV)
systems under varying irradiance and temperature. The Incremental Conductance (IC) method determines the
maximum power point (MPP) by evaluating the slope of the powervoltage characteristic, which becomes zero
at the MPP:
Page 1498
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue III, March 2026





By comparing incremental conductance (


) with instantaneous conductance (
), the algorithm identifies the
operating region. When


, the system operates at MPP; if


, the operating point is left of MPP,
and if


, it is right of MPP. The controller measures PV voltage and current, computes incremental
changes and updates the duty cycle of the DC-DC converter accordingly. This adaptive adjustment enables fast
convergence and reduces steady-state oscillations, improving overall tracking efficiency.
Figure 2: Flow Chart of Incremental Conductance Algorithm
Figure 2 presents the flowchart of the Incremental Conductance (IC) MPPT algorithm. The process begins with
measuring the PV voltage and current, followed by calculating their incremental changes. The algorithm



󰇛
󰇜

󰇛
󰇜



󰇛
󰇜

󰇛
󰇜
Measure

󰇛
󰇜


󰇛󰇜



















󰇛
󰇜

󰇛
󰇜


󰇛
󰇜

󰇛
󰇜


󰇛
󰇜

󰇛
󰇜


󰇛
󰇜

󰇛
󰇜

Return
Page 1499
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue III, March 2026
compares the ratio of change in current to change in voltage with the instantaneous conductance to determine
the position of the operating point relative to the maximum power point (MPP). Based on this comparison, the
duty cycle of the converter is adjusted to move the system toward the MPP. This procedure is repeated
continuously to ensure accurate tracking under varying environmental conditions
Algorithm steps
1. Acquire the instantaneous PV voltage V(k) and current I(k).
2. Determine incremental variations:
ΔV=V(k)-V(k-1), ΔI=I(k)-I(k-1)
3. If ΔV=0:
o ΔI=0 → system operates at MPP
o ΔI>0 → increase duty cycle
o ΔI<0 → decrease duty cycle
4. If ΔV≠0:
o Evaluate ΔI/ΔV and compare with −I/V
o Update duty cycle to shift operating point toward MPP
5. Repeat the process continuously for real-time tracking.
DC-DC Boost Conerter
A DC-DC boost converter is utilized to elevate the output voltage of the photovoltaic (PV) array to a higher level
suitable for load and battery requirements. It enables efficient power transfer by regulating the voltage through
controlled switching action. The converter stores energy in the inductor during the ON state of the switch and
transfers it to the load during the OFF state, resulting in an output voltage higher than the input.
Modes of operation:
The converter operates in two conduction modes:
Continuous Conduction Mode (CCM):
The inductor current remains non-zero throughout the switching cycle, ensuring lower ripple and stable
operation.
Discontinuous Conduction Mode (DCM):
The inductor current drops to zero within a switching period, typically under light load conditions, leading to
increased ripple.
Design relations:
The voltage gain of the boost converter is given by:


Page 1500
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue III, March 2026
The output current is expressed as:


The inductor current ripple and output voltage ripple are approximated as:


󰇛󰇜





The required inductance and capacitance values are:

󰇛


󰇜


󰇛󰇜
󰇛


󰇜

The load resistance is given by:

󰇛󰇜
Table 2: BOOST Converter Specifications
PARAMETER
SYMBOL
VALUE
Input Voltage
V
in
24 V
Output Voltage
V
out
48 V
Duty Cycle
D
0.5
Switching Frequency
f
s
20 KHz
Inductor
L
0.47 mH
Input Capacitor
C
in
220 µF
Output Capacitor
C
out
470 µF
Load Resistance
R
10.7 ohm
Matlab/Simulink Model
The proposed system is developed in MATLAB/Simulink by integrating key functional blocks, including the
PV array subsystem, Incremental Conductance (IC) MPPT controller, PWM generator and DC-DC boost
converter. The PV subsystem provides real-time voltage and current signals, which are processed by the MPPT
controller to determine the optimal operating point. The IC algorithm computes the required duty cycle based
on these inputs, which is then converted into PWM pulses to control the switching of the boost converter,
ensuring efficient power transfer to the load
Page 1501
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue III, March 2026
Figure 3: Boost Circuit
Figure 3 shows the simulation model of the DCDC boost converter used in the photovoltaic system. The circuit
consists of an inductor, switch (MOSFET), diode, and output capacitor. The inductor stores energy when the
switch is ON and releases it when the switch is OFF, thereby increasing the output voltage. The diode ensures
unidirectional current flow, while the capacitor smooths the output voltage and reduces ripple. The switching
operation is controlled by a PWM signal generated from the MPPT controller, which adjusts the duty cycle to
maintain maximum power extraction from the PV system
Figure 4: PWM Generator Block
Figure 4 represents the PWM generator block used in the Incremental Conductance (IC) MPPT system. This
block converts the duty cycle signal obtained from the IC algorithm into a pulse-width modulated (PWM)
switching signal. The duty cycle determines the ON and OFF duration of the switch in the boost converter. By
varying this duty cycle, the PWM generator controls the switching operation of the converter, ensuring that the
PV system operates at or near the maximum power point. This enables efficient regulation of output voltage and
optimal power extraction.
Simulation Results Analysis
Figure 5 illustrates the dynamic response of the photovoltaic system employing the Incremental Conductance
(IC) MPPT algorithm, showing the variation of output power, voltage and current.
Page 1502
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue III, March 2026
Figure 5: Incremental Conductance MPPT Controller Output Power, Output Voltage and Output
Current
The system demonstrates fast convergence to the maximum power point (MPP) with high stability and minimal
oscillations. Under varying irradiance conditions, the proposed method achieves a tracking efficiency of
approximately 9698%, indicating effective utilization of available solar energy. The convergence time is
observed to be less than 0.05 seconds, reflecting a rapid dynamic response. Furthermore, steady-state oscillations
around the MPP are significantly reduced compared to conventional methods such as Perturb and Observe
(P&O). These results confirm that the proposed IC-based MPPT system provides reliable, accurate and efficient
performance, making it suitable for practical photovoltaic applications.
To calculate MPPT Tracking Efficiency:



P
out
= Output power obtained (from simulation graph)
P
max
= Theoretical maximum power of PV panel
Table 3: Comparison Table
PARAMETER
P&O METHOD
IC PROPOSED METHOD
Tracking Efficiency
90-94%
96-98%
Convergence Time
High (0.1 to 0.2 sec)
Low (< 0.05sec)
Steady-state oscillation
High
Low
Accuracy
Moderate
High
Complexity
Low
Moderate
Page 1503
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue III, March 2026
CONCLUSION
This paper presented an improved Incremental Conductance MPPT technique integrated with a DCDC boost
converter for photovoltaic systems. The proposed method enhances tracking performance by improving
convergence speed and reducing oscillations. Simulation results confirm high efficiency and stable operation
under varying environmental conditions. Although the study is limited to simulation, the results indicate strong
potential for practical implementation. Future work will focus on hardware validation and comparison with
intelligent MPPT techniques such as fuzzy logic and neural networks.
REFERENCES
1. Asnil, K., et al. (2024). “Enhanced Incremental Conductance Maximum Power Point Tracking Algorithm
for Photovoltaic System in Variable Conditions.Journal Europeen des Systemes Automatises.
2. D. A. Asoh, B., et al. (2022). “Maximum Power Point Tracking Using the Incremental Conductance
Algorithm for PV Systems Operating in Rapidly Changing Environmental Conditions.Smart Grid and
Renewable Energy.
3. Asnil, R., et al. (2024). “Performance Analysis of an Incremental Conductance MPPT Algorithm for
Photovoltaic Systems Under Rapid Irradiance Changes.TEM Journal, 10871094.
4. Owusu-Nyarko, M., et al. (2021). “Modified Variable Step-Size Incremental Conductance MPPT
Technique for Photovoltaic Systems.Electronics.
5. I. M. Ali, Z., et al. (2022). “An Efficient MPPT Technique-Based Single-Stage Incremental Conductance
for Integrated PV Systems Considering Flyback Central-Type PV Inverter.Sustainability.
6. Nazir, K., et al. (2025). “Enhanced Incremental Conductance MPPT for Photovoltaic System Using
Adaptive Step Size and Holding Strategy for Improved Performance.IOP Conference Series: Earth and
Environmental Science.
7. M. Hebchi, A., et al. (2021). “Improved incremental conductance algorithm for MPPT in photovoltaic
system.in Proc. 18th Int. Multi-Conf. Systems, Signals and Devices (SSD), 12711278.
8. Hemavathi R., et al. Electroluminescence Imaging for Defect Analysis in Polycrystalline Solar Cells
Metall. Mater. Eng, 1279-1288.
9. G. S. Chawda, O., et al. (2020). “Incremental conductance based particle swarm optimization algorithm
for global maximum power tracking of solar-PV under non uniform operating conditions. Applied
Sciences, 4575.
10. M. A. Elgendy, B., et al. (2013). “Assessment of the incremental conductance maximum power point
tracking algorithm.IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 108117.
11. R. I. Putri, S., et al. (2015). Maximum power point tracking for photovoltaic using incremental
conductance method.Energy Procedia, 2230.
12. Hemavathi R., et al. (2019). Simulation of SEPIC DC-DC Converter using LABVIEW.International
journal of creative and research in all studies, 2581-5334.