Page 287
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
The Adoption Paradox: Cryptocurrency Regulation, Virtual Digital
Asset Taxation, and Financial Inclusion in India
Maanish M, Ms. Savitha D
School of Economics and Commerce, CMR University, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560043, India
*Corresponding Author
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150400026
Received: 10 April 2026; Accepted: 15 April 2026; Published: 04 May 2026
ABSTRACT
India maintains its position as the central hub which has driven cryptocurrency from its initial experimental
phase into a global financial revolution. India leads the world in blockchain adoption because it has 119 million
crypto users, which makes it the top country for blockchain adoption. The nation enforces a 30 percent flat tax
on Virtual Digital Asset earnings. This does not allow taxpayers to reduce their tax burden through loss
deductions while it also requires a 1 percent Tax Deducted at Source. The paper analyzes how India has
developed its regulatory framework and studies the Finance Act 2022 tax system impacts, and Digital Rupee
expansion, and Web3 startup network, and decentralized finance potential for financial inclusion in India. The
study shows that India allows about 60 percent of cryptocurrency transactions to occur outside its borders
because of its current regulatory system, which is based on information from RBI publications and government
policy documents, and Supreme Court rulings, and IMF and FATF reports, and Chainalysis and CoinSwitch
industry data, and financial journalism until early 2026. The paper demonstrates that India requires a single
regulatory framework, which provides fairness and clarity, and future-oriented guidance to achieve its digital
asset economy potential.
Keywords: Cryptocurrency, Virtual Digital Assets, Digital Rupee (CBDC), Financial Inclusion
INTRODUCTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW
Introduction
Financial systems throughout history have reflected the technological advancements and social structures which
existed during their creation. The evolution of value exchange systems began with barter systems and continued
through metal coins and paper currency before digital banking emerged because of technological advancements
and economic requirements. The creation of cryptocurrency brought about a complete transformation in financial
systems because it operates as digital money which uses cryptographic protection. It runs on blockchain networks
that do not require government or central bank involvement. The first cryptocurrency to appear was Bitcoin
which Satoshi Nakamoto introduced in 2009. Since that time numerous digital currencies have appeared, which
include Ethereum, Ripple, and multiple stablecoins that deliver unique functionalities and technological
advancements.
In the Indian context, the conversation around cryptocurrency is particularly compelling. The financial system
of India which supports 1.4 billion people and operates as the fifth-largest global economy has achieved
significant progress through its Unified Payments Interface (UPI) system. Many people in the population do not
have access to banking services, or their banking needs are not sufficiently met. The Indian government together
with the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) have maintained an unstable relationship regarding cryptocurrency
operations because the RBI prohibited regulated entities from providing services to crypto businesses in 2018
until the Supreme Court overturned this decision in 2020. The Finance Act of 2022 established a 30 percent flat
tax rate for Virtual Digital Asset (VDA) gains and implemented a 1 percent TDS requirement. This indicates
Page 288
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
that cryptocurrency exists despite the unclear regulatory framework. The research investigates India's present
situation together with its future development direction.
Literature Review
The academic research on cryptocurrency began when Nakamoto published his 2008 white paper which
introduced Bitcoin as a decentralized electronic payment network. Böhme et al. (2015) conducted fundamental
research which explained Bitcoin operations and its various regulatory issues. Yermack (2015) studied Bitcoin
to determine if it functioned as a conventional currency but discovered its unpredictable price made it unsuitable
for payment transactions. Catalini and Gans (2016) demonstrated that blockchain technology would decrease
verification and networking expenses. This would create major changes for financial intermediation operations.
The stablecoin market reached a value above $250 billion during 2025. The United States Bitcoin ETFs currently
handle assets which range from $150–$170 billion.
India's involvement with cryptocurrency emerges from its distinct population characteristics together with its
advanced technological infrastructure. The Chainalysis 2024 Global Crypto Adoption Index shows that India
ranked first in the world for adoption of crypto for two consecutive years. Approximately 119 million Indians
own cryptocurrency, with 72 percent of investors under the age 35 (CoinSwitch Q2 2025 Report). The platform
now receives more than 75% of its activity from cities which belong to Tier 2, Tier 3, and Tier 4 categories,
while Uttar Pradesh leads with 13 percent. Maciejasz et al. (2024) found that younger users became more
receptive to digital financial services during the COVID-19 pandemic.
India's regulatory history is among the most complex globally. The Supreme Court ruled against the RBI banking
prohibition of 2018 through its Internet and Mobile Association of India v. RBI (2020) decision. This determined
that the ban violated the constitutional right to trade under Article 19(1)(g).
The Finance Act 2022 established a 30 percent flat tax and 1 percent TDS on cryptocurrencies as VDAs, which
led to a decrease in domestic exchange activities by 50–70 percent. The FATF's 2024 assessment of India
concluded that the country was still in early stages of crypto AML compliance. The European Union finished its
MiCA implementation during December 2024, but the United States established its first federal stablecoin
framework through the GENIUS Act.
The RBI launched its Digital Rupee pilot in 2022, expanding to 17 banks with over 6 million active users and
circulation growing 334 percent to ₹1,016 crore by March 2025. The Atlantic Council's CBDC Tracker reports
that 137 countries representing 98 percent of global GDP are exploring CBDCs.
The research of El Hajj and Farran (2024) demonstrates that cryptocurrency adoption significantly and positively
influenced financial inclusion in the emerging markets. Setyawan et al. (2024) identifies that reducing transaction
costs and faster settlement as key benefits. The study by Kyaw (2025) identified three barriers including
regulatory uncertainty, digital literacy gaps, and infrastructure deficits. Le (2025) using a New Keynesian DSGE
model, demonstrated that cryptocurrency plays a crucial role in banking sectors of emerging economies.
Research Gap, Questions, and Objectives
Research Gap
Despite the growing body of literature on cryptocurrency in India, several significant gaps remain. Most existing
research focuses narrowly on individual aspects regulation, technology, or market data without integrating them
into a single analytical framework. The rapid pace of regulatory change in 2024–2026, including the FIU's
enforcement actions, the Digital Rupee's expansion, and the Orissa High Court's demand for legal clarity, has
not been adequately synthesized in accessible academic literature. Furthermore, the geographic democratization
of India's crypto market and the paradox of mass adoption alongside punitive regulation have not been
systematically analyzed.
Page 289
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
Research Questions
1. How has India's regulatory framework particularly the Finance Act 2022 impacted domestic
cryptocurrency adoption and market behaviour?
2. What role can cryptocurrency and blockchain technology play in advancing financial inclusion and
economic development in India?
3. How does India's regulatory approach compare with global frameworks, and what is the most likely
trajectory for the coexistence of the Digital Rupee and private cryptocurrencies?
Research Objectives
1. To examine the evolution, current state, and real-world impact of India's cryptocurrency regulatory
framework on market participation and trading behaviour.
2. To evaluate the opportunities that cryptocurrency and blockchain technology present for financial inclusion,
remittance efficiency, and economic innovation in India.
3. To assess India's regulatory approach within a global comparative context and propose evidence-based
recommendations for a balanced regulatory framework.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Research Design
This study follows a descriptive and analytical research design with a qualitative orientation. A descriptive
design is used to accurately portray the current state of cryptocurrency in India, while the analytical component
examines underlying causes, implications, and policy directions. The study does not test a statistical hypothesis
but takes an interpretive approach, drawing on a wide range of secondary sources to build a coherent, evidence-
based argument about cryptocurrency's role in India's financial future.
Data Collection
All research in this study depends on secondary data which consists of previously gathered and published
information by other researchers and institutions. The research team selected secondary data because the subject
matter contains extensive documentation from official institutional sources and official documents and expert
analysis provide the best understanding of the fast-evolving regulatory landscape and the research requires
demonstration of advanced knowledge synthesis through critical evaluation of existing information.
Research data was collected from five different sources which included (a) official government and regulatory
publications from the RBI, Ministry of Finance, FIU India, and Supreme Court judgments; (b) international
institutional reports from the IMF, World Bank, FATF, and Atlantic Council; (c) industry and market research
from Chainalysis, CoinSwitch, and Statista; (d) peer-reviewed academic journals from Google Scholar, SSRN,
ScienceDirect, and MDPI; and (e) credible financial journalism from the Economic Times, LiveMint,
Bloomberg, and Reuters for recent developments not yet captured in academic literature.
Mode of Collection
The study began by surveying the broader cryptocurrency literature globally, then narrowed the focus to India
specifically. Searches used keyword combinations such as "cryptocurrency India," "crypto regulation India,"
"Digital Rupee CBDC," and "blockchain financial inclusion." The sources were filtered to prioritize publications
from 2019 to early 2026. Each source was evaluated against four criteria: credibility, relevance, recency, and
consistency through cross-referencing.
Page 290
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
Analytical Approach
The analysis is thematic and comparative. Thematic analysis identified recurring patterns regulatory uncertainty,
the adoption paradox, financial inclusion potential, CBDC development, and global positioning organized into
coherent themes. The comparative dimension places India's policy alongside the US, EU, China, Singapore, and
Hong Kong. As a qualitative, secondary-data study, no statistical techniques such as regression or hypothesis
testing were employed; instead, the study uses interpretive synthesis, policy comparison, and evidence
triangulation as its core analytical methods.
Analysis And Interpretation
Analytical Technique
Thematic content analysis alongside comparative policy analysis was employed to examine the data. This
involved reading across regulatory documents, market reports, academic papers, and institutional publications,
then identifying recurring patterns that spoke to the research questions. A quantitative approach would not have
been appropriate here. The material is too varied in format and purpose for statistical testing, and thematic
analysis provided the flexibility needed to draw meaning from sources ranging from RBI circulars to exchange
white papers.
Market Analysis
India's cryptocurrency market is valued at approximately $3–4 billion in 2025 and projected to reach $14.2
billion by 2034 (CAGR of 18.65 percent). On-chain transaction volumes reached $2.36 trillion between July
2024 and June 2025, a 69 percent year-on-year increase. Over 52 percent of activity involves actual value
transfers rather than speculation. Bitcoin dominates at 33 percent of holdings, followed by Ethereum and other
Layer 1 assets at 35.52 percent. The demographic profile 72 percent under 35, 75 percent from Tier 2–4 cities
reveals a financial phenomenon that has penetrated India's heartland.
Regulatory Impact
The Finance Act 2022's VDA framework produced outcomes directly contrary to its objectives. The 30 percent
flat tax with no loss offsets creates economically irrational situations: an investor who gains ₹5 lakh on Bitcoin
and loses ₹4 lakh on Ethereum pays ₹1.5 lakh in tax on the Bitcoin gain alone an effective rate of 150 percent
on the net gain of ₹1 lakh. The 1 percent TDS, applied to transaction value rather than gains, rendered high-
frequency trading unviable on domestic platforms. Approximately 60 percent of Indian crypto transactions now
flow through offshore platforms, meaning the government collects less revenue and exercises less oversight than
a rational framework would produce.
Challenges
The analysis identifies five critical challenges. The absence of a standalone crypto law is the most fundamental,
causing approximately 60 percent of Indian Web3 startups to incorporate abroad. Cybersecurity vulnerabilities
remain serious the WazirX hack of July 2024 resulted in $234 million in losses from a single wallet holding 45
percent of customer funds. Fraud, Ponzi schemes, and celebrity-endorsed token promotions prey on financially
inexperienced participants in smaller cities. The structural tax disadvantage means an investor with zero net gain
can still owe substantial taxes. Finally, the financial literacy gap remains wide most retail investors enter through
peer recommendations rather than informed analysis.
Opportunities
Four key opportunity areas emerge. First, crypto-based remittance channels can reduce fees from 3–7 percent to
under 1 percent on India's $125+ billion annual remittance inflows, potentially saving households $2 billion per
year. Second, India's Web3 ecosystem over 1,250 startups, $653 million in 2025 funding, growing at 42 percent
annually is projected to become the world's largest Web3 developer hub by 2028, with India accounting for 12
Page 291
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
percent of global Web3 developer contributions. Third, the Digital Rupee's programmability features enable
purpose-driven welfare disbursements that could reduce leakage in subsidy delivery. Fourth, cryptocurrency
provides accessible portfolio diversification, with Bitcoin's low correlation to the Nifty 500 offering risk-
reduction benefits and minimum investments as low as ₹100.
The Future: Coexistence
The evidence points toward a future defined by coexistence rather than competition between the Digital Rupee
and private cryptocurrencies. The Digital Rupee serves purposes requiring state backing monetary sovereignty,
welfare delivery, and regulated cross-border settlement while private cryptocurrencies provide permissionless
global investment access, censorship-resistant value transfer, and decentralized financial applications. The 119
million Indians holding cryptocurrency are not rejecting the rupee; they are supplementing their financial life
with capabilities it cannot offer.
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION
Key Findings
This research yields five principal findings. First, India is the world's largest retail crypto market with 119 million
participants driven by organic grassroots adoption. Second, India's regulatory framework is failing the punitive
tax structure has pushed 60 percent of trading offshore while 60 percent of Indian Web3 startups have
incorporated abroad. Third, cybersecurity and investor protection gaps are serious, as demonstrated by the
WazirX hack ($234 million) and the absence of mandatory custody standards. Fourth, the opportunities are real
and time-sensitive India's Web3 sector, remittance efficiency gains, and Digital Rupee innovation represent
genuine pathways to global leadership. Fifth, the future will be defined by coexistence between the Digital Rupee
and private cryptocurrencies, as they serve fundamentally different purposes.
CONCLUSION
What comes through clearly in the evidence is that India's monetary future is not going to be a clean either-or
between traditional finance and decentralized currencies. The real question is regulatory. India already has 119
million crypto users, the second-largest Web3 developer ecosystem globally, and public digital infrastructure
Aadhaar, UPI, and Digital Rupee that gives it a head start most countries do not have. The bottleneck is policy.
There is still no standalone crypto law, the tax structure actively discourages participation, and investor
protections are minimal. These are solvable problems, but they have gone unsolved for years, and the longer that
continues, the wider the gap grows between what India's crypto ecosystem could be and what it is.
RECOMMENDATIONS, LIMITATIONS, AND SCOPE
Recommendations
The government should pass a standalone cryptocurrency law defining VDA's legal status, establishing licensing
requirements, and creating investor protection mechanisms. The VDA tax structure should be reformed to allow
loss offsets, differentiate between short-term and long-term holdings, and reduce TDS from 1 percent to 0.01
percent. The RBI should accelerate Digital Rupee development with UPI integration and scale programmability
for welfare delivery. A formal inter-regulator coordination mechanism among the RBI, SEBI, Ministry of
Finance, and FIU should resolve jurisdictional ambiguity. The crypto industry should adopt mandatory proof-
of-reserves and asset segregation standards and invest in regional-language financial literacy. Individual
investors should limit crypto allocation to 5–10 percent of investable assets, use only FIU-registered exchanges,
and understand their tax obligations.
Limitations of the Study
This study has several limitations. Firstly, it relies entirely on secondary data and does not capture the lived
Page 292
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
experiences of retail investors through primary surveys or interviews. Second, the rapidly evolving regulatory
environment means some developments may have occurred after the data collection period. Third, the reliance
on English-language sources may underrepresent perspectives from regional media and community-level
discussions about crypto adoption in rural India.
Scope of the Study
This study focuses on the Indian context covering developments from 2018 to early 2026. While global
comparisons are referenced, the primary lens remains in India. The study encompasses cryptocurrency adoption
patterns, regulatory evolution, the Digital Rupee initiative, financial inclusion potential, Web3 ecosystem
development, and comparative global regulatory analysis. Future research should incorporate primary data from
Tier 2–4 city investors, economic modelling of alternative tax structures, and longitudinal analysis of Digital
Rupee–private cryptocurrency coexistence dynamics.
REFERENCES
(APA 7th Edition)
1. Böhme, R., Christin, N., Edelman, B., & Moore, T. (2015). Bitcoin: Economics, technology, and
governance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(2), 213–238. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.2.213
2. Catalini, C., & Gans, J. S. (2016). Some simple economics of the blockchain (NBER Working Paper No.
22952). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w22952
3. Chainalysis. (2024). The 2024 global crypto adoption index. Chainalysis Inc.
https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/2024-global-crypto-adoption-index
4. Chainalysis. (2025). Asia Pacific crypto market report 2025. Chainalysis Inc.
https://www.chainalysis.com
5. CoinSwitch. (2025). Annual report 2025: India crypto market trends and demographics. CoinSwitch
Kuber. https://coinswitch.co
6. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information
technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
7. El Hajj, M., & Farran, I. (2024). Cryptocurrency adoption and financial inclusion: Evidence from
emerging markets. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(4), 145–168.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17040145
8. Financial Action Task Force. (2024). India mutual evaluation report: Anti-money laundering measures.
FATF. https://www.fatf-gafi.org
9. Government of India. (2022). The Finance Act, 2022: Provisions relating to virtual digital assets.
Ministry of Finance. https://www.incometax.gov.in
10. Griffin, J. M., & Shams, A. (2020). Is Bitcoin really untethered? Journal of Finance, 75(4), 1913–1964.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12903
11. Kayani, U., & Hasan, M. (2024). Crypto remittances and the cost of cross-border transfers in South Asia.
International Journal of Financial Studies, 12(1), 34–51. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs12010034
12. Kyaw, T. (2025). Barriers to cryptocurrency adoption in developing economies: A systematic review.
SSRN Electronic Journal. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4812345
13. Le, T. H. (2025). Cryptocurrency, CBDCs, and macroeconomic dynamics in emerging economies.
Journal of International Money and Finance, 148, 103145.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2025.103145
14. Maciejasz, M., Kowal, A., & Brzozowska, A. (2024). Digital financial tools adoption during COVID-
19. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 63, 101356.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2024.101356
15. Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
16. Reserve Bank of India. (2025). Digital Rupee circulation update: March 2025. RBI.
https://www.rbi.org.in
17. Setyawan, I. R., Santosa, P. W., & Widjaja, A. (2024). Bridging financial inclusion gaps through
cryptocurrency and mobile money. Sustainability, 16(3), 1042. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031042
Page 293
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
18. Statista. (2025). Cryptocurrency market in India: Revenue and user statistics. Statista Market Insights.
https://www.statista.com
19. Supreme Court of India. (2020). Internet and Mobile Association of India v. Reserve Bank of India (W.P.
No. 528 of 2018). https://www.sci.gov.in
20. Yermack, D. (2015). Is Bitcoin a real currency? An economic appraisal. In Handbook of digital currency
(pp. 31–43). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802117-0.00002-3
