Page 371
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
Seroprevalence of Hepatitis E Virus Among Patients Attending
Federal Medical Centre, Mubi, Adamawa State, Nigeria.
Papka I. M
1
; Umar M. M
2
; Ishaq M. S
3
& Damijida J
1
1
Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Adamawa State University, Mubi, PMB 25, Adamawa
state, Nigeria.
2
Department of Environmental Health Science, Bayero University, Kano. Nigeria
3
Galtima mai Kyari College of Health Sciences and Technology Nguru, Yobe State. Nigeria.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150400033
Received: 17 October 2025; Accepted: 23 October 2025; Published: 04 May 2026
ABSTRACT
Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is an emerging cause of acute viral hepatitis, particularly in regions with poor sanitation.
This study assessed the seroprevalence of HEV among patients attending the Federal Medical Centre (FMC),
Mubi, Nigeria. Methods: A cross-sectional study involving 100 consenting participants was conducted. Blood
samples were analyzed for HEV antibodies using standard serological methods. Demographic data and HEV
seroprevalence were analyzed and presented in tables and figures. Results: Out of the 100 participants, 28 (28%)
were male and 72 (72%) female, with a mean age of 36.40 ± 13.20 years. Overall, 6 (6%) tested positive for
HEV antibodies, while 94 (94%) were negative. HEV seroprevalence among females was 4 (83%) and 1 (17%)
among males. However, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.98). The majority of participants
were HEV-negative, suggesting low-level circulation of the virus in this population. Conclusion: The study
found a moderate HEV seroprevalence (6%) among patients at FMC, Mubi. These findings highlight the need
for improved hygiene practices and routine screening for HEV, especially in healthcare settings. Further research
is recommended to better understand HEV epidemiology in Nigeria.
Keywords: Hepatitis E virus, Seroprevalence, Federal Medical Centre Mubi, Viral hepatitis, Public health,
Nigeria.
INTRODUCTION
Hepatitis E virus (HEV) has emerged as a threat to public health, with an estimated number of 70,000 deaths
from genotypes 1 and 2 globally. HEV is a quasi-enveloped, single-stranded, positive-sense RNA virus with a
genome size between 6.4 and 7.2 kb. Classified into the Hepeviridae family Orthohepevirus A, HEV has eight
known genotypes of which four are pathogenic to humans (HEV-genotypes 14); however, the HEV-genotype
7 initially found in dromedary could be also detected in immunosuppressed individuals. The principal mode of
transmission in humans is the fecal- oral route, (Mushahwar, 2008). HEV may also be transmitted parenterally,
and direct person to-person transmission is rare. In industrialized countries, the frequency of IgG antibodies to
HEV (anti-HEV IgG) varies from 1 to 20%, (Aggarwal and Jameel, 2022), meanwhile in developing countries
with poor hygienic conditions, the frequency of anti-HEV IgG varies from 4 to 84.3%. Immunological changes
during pregnancy favor the preservation of the foetus in the maternal environment by the suppression of T
lymphocyte-induced immunity, thus rendering the pregnant woman more vulnerable to contract viral infections
like the HEV, (Navaneethan et al., 2008). HEV infection during the third trimester of pregnancy is associated
to a more severe infection that could lead to hepatic failure and possibly maternal death. Clinical features of
hepatitis E are indistinguishable from acute hepatitis caused by other hepatotropic viruses. The incubation
period ranges from 1560 days, with a mean of 40 days. HEV-infected persons exhibit a wide clinical spectrum,
ranging from asymptomatic infection through acute icteric hepatitis to fulminant hepatitis. The ratio of
symptomatic to asymptomatic infection has not been reliably determined, and may vary with viral genotype
and epidemiologic setting. Acute hepatitis E usually manifests with icterus, malaise, anorexia, fever,
Page 372
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
hepatomegaly, and occasionally pruritus. Studies in non-human primates have shown a relationship between
the host’s immunological response and degree of liver injury with the dose of viral inoculum.
Immunosuppressed persons, in particular solid organ transplant recipients on immunosuppressive drugs, fail to
clear the virus leading to chronic HEV infection (lasting >6 months); such cases have mostly had HEV genotype
3 infection, except for one child who had infection with genotype 4 HEV. The laboratory abnormalities in acute
hepatitis E are similar to those in acute viral hepatitis caused by other viruses. Laboratory diagnosis of recent
HEV infection is based on detection of HEV-specific IgM (IgA in some countries) antibodies or detection of
HEV RNA in clinical samples. Past HEV infection is characterized by specific IgG antibodies against ORF2,
which may confer protection against reinfection; however, the protective titer and the duration of their
persistence are uncertain. Certain population sub-groups are at a higher risk for severe disease following HEV
infection. These include pregnant women, persons with pre-existing liver disease and persons with
immunosuppression, (Kumar, 2022).
During HEV epidemics, fulminant hepatitis occurs with a disproportionately high rate among pregnant women,
Treatment for acute hepatitis E is generally supportive. Chronic hepatitis E in solid organ transplant (SOT)
recipients on immunosuppressive treatment has been successfully treated by withdrawal or reduction of
immunosuppressive drugs, administration of ribavirin, administration of interferon or a combination of these
measures, (Kamar, 2008). Surveillance for hepatitis E disease is very limited and information on disease
occurrence and distribution are available only from a few European countries, and most of the data from other
parts of the world are limited to reports of outbreaks and case series. By contrast, much more information is
available on the seroprevalence of antibodies to HEV, a marker of previous exposure to HEV. However, the
interpretation of seroprevalence data is immensely challenging for several reasons. These challenges include
the lack of comparability of results from the different assays, high seroprevalence in populations where disease
is rare or never reported, the presence of multiple genotypes with different disease patterns and inability of
serological tests to distinguish between genotypes, and lack of data for reliable mathematical modelling to
determine disease burden from seroprevalence. Furthermore, the majority of seroprevalence studies do not
involve a representative sample of any population making it difficult to infer prevalence and trends to the
population, Poor laboratory assay performance is the major challenge in interpreting seroprevalence study
results. Many studies have shown poor concordance between commercial IgG HEV assays; some reports
showed significant batch to batch variability of IgG anti HEV assays, (Abravenel, 2020). The lack of a gold
standard test to determine the performance of IgG assays is another challenge. Recent studies comparing the
diagnostic accuracy of assays commonly used in Europe and the US for the detection of antibodies against HEV
have yielded a significant discrepancy in performance, (Abravanel, 2020). The protective efficacy and the long-
term persistence of IgG antibodies against HEV following natural infection has not been clearly determined.
The fact that the prevalence of anti-HEV in the population does not reach the very high levels observed with
hepatitis A and that attack rates are higher among young to middle aged adults suggests that infections may not
confer lifetime protection or infections usually occur later in life.
This intriguing finding is complicated by the recurrence of outbreaks in countries where past epidemics in the
population would have resulted in immunity to prevent future outbreaks. The duration of anti-HEV IgG and the
protective efficacy of naturally acquired antibodies are important because of the implications for long term
vaccine efficacy. In spite of all these challenges, seroprevalence data provides a general picture as to whether
HEV infection is endemic in a country, if population has a disproportionately high rate of infection (e.g., persons
with animal contact), and for estimation of population level susceptibility to HEV infection. The result obtained
could be due to the fact that during an HEV infection IgM type antibodies are synthesized 1 to 4 weeks before
clinical manifestations and disappear 8 to 12 weeks after infection. Anti-HEV IgM is the serologic marker of
choice for diagnosis of acute HEV infection. On the other hand, anti-HEV IgG antibodies usually persist for
many years after infection. HEV-genotypes 1 and 2 (HEV-1 and -2) are transmitted via the fecal-oral route and
exclusively infect humans. Infections with HEV-1 can be more severe in HIV, where case fatality rates up to
25% have been reported. (https://www.who.int/immunization/sage/meetings/2023/o (2020). Also, certain
population groups like immunosuppressed persons and individuals with pre-existing liver disease are more
vulnerable to infections with HEV. HEV genotypes 3 and 4, on the other hand, have been found in both humans
and animals and are transmitted zoonotic ally via the ingestion of raw or undercooked meat and close contact
to infected animals. Furthermore, HEV-3 and -4 can lead to chronic infections, especially in
immunocompromised individuals. In patients with chronic HBV infection, super-infection with HEV is a
Page 373
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
common cause of liver failure, accounting for 20% of cases in regions endemic for HEV. Furthermore, in some
studies a higher HEV seroprevalence in individuals with HBV-related liver disease in comparison to healthy
individuals has been observed. In Nigeria, only a few HEV seroprevalence studies have been performed until
today which detected a seroprevalence (IgG and total antibodies) between 7.0%66.7percent in different
populations, (Osundare, et al., 2020). In one study, the prevalence of HBV/HEV coinfection was analyzed in
Nigerian healthcare workers, reporting a coinfection rate of 27.3%.
Statement of Problem
There is a paucity of information on HEV infection among HIV patients in Federal Medical Centre, Mubi,
Adamawa State, Nigeria. In addition, Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is an emerging infectious agent More than 20
million cases of HEV infection occur that causes acute viral hepatitis worldwide. Annually all over the world,
with about 70,000 deaths. HEV is the leading cause of enteric ally-transmitted viral hepatitis. Hepatitis E as
sporadic disease or outbreaks have occurred in at least sixty-three countries; about half of these countries have
reported large outbreaks.
Aims and Objectives of Study
The main aim of this study was to determine the Seroprevalence of Hepatitis E virus among patients attending
Federal Medical Centre, Mubi, Adamawa state, Nigeria.
Objectives of the Study
The objectives of this study are to:
i. determine the seroprevalence of Hepatitis E virus among patients attending federal medical centre,
mubi.
ii. determine the demographic distribution of Hepatitis E virus base on gender of patients attending
federal medical centre, mubi.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study Area
Federal Medical Centre, Mubi is located in the heart of Mubi town, in the Mubi North Local Government Area
of Adamawa State, Nigeria. The hospital is situated along the Mubi-Yola road, approximately 2 kilometers from
the town center. Mubi is situated in the northern part of Adamawa State, Nigeria. The town lies between latitudes
10°15'N and 10°20'N, and longitudes 13°15'E and 13°20'E. Mubi has a semi-arid climate with a rainy season
that lasts from May to October. The average annual rainfall is around 800 mm, with a mean temperature of 28°C.
The vegetation in Mubi is mainly savanna grassland with scattered trees, including acacia and bauna. Mubi is
situated in a valley surrounded by hills.
The town has a gentle slope, with an average elevation of 500 meters above sea level. The demographic
characteristics of Mubi include: Population: As of 2016, the estimated population of Mubi North Local
Government Area was approximately 177,000 people. The age distribution of Mubi is characterized by a high
proportion of young people, with over 50% of the population under the age of 20. The sex ratio in Mubi is
approximately 1:1, with a slight preponderance of females.
Mubi is inhabited by several ethnic groups, including the Fulani, Hausa, Gudei and Marghi. Federal Medical
Centre, Mubi is the main healthcare facility in the town, providing a range of medical services. The hospital
provides outpatient services, including general consultations, laboratory tests, and pharmacy services. The
hospital has an inpatient ward, providing care for patients requiring hospitalization. The hospital has a maternity
ward, providing antenatal, delivery, and postnatal care. The hospital has a laboratory, providing a range of
diagnostic tests, including blood tests, urine tests, and stool tests.
Page 374
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
Study Population
The study population for this research included the patients attended Federal Medical Centre, Mubi.
Sample Collection
Approximately 4ml of blood was aseptically collected from each volunteer using a sterile syringe and needle
from a prominent vein situated at the antecubital fossa of each individual and placed in 5ml plain bottle.
Blood samples was transported in insulated containers containing ice packs to the Microbiology laboratory,
FMC, Mubi, where the serum of each sample was separated from the whole blood and placed in cryo-vial
on the deep freezer for preservation until tested.
Laboratory Analysis for hev Serological Test
The test was performed based on the principle of immunochromatography invitro for qualitative determination
of HEV antigens in blood (Bio tracer’s TM). The tested HEV samples was specific monoclonal antibodies coated
on the membrane of the test device. The tested device (cassette) was then taken out of the foil pouch and placed
on a clean and placed on a flat surface bench. Then the dispenser cap of the sample tube was twisted off and by
holding the tube vertically, five (4) drops of the mixture of the stool sample and buffer were dispensed into the
sample well of the cassette test device. The results was recorded after 15 minutes.
Materials Provided with the Test Kits
The testing device (cassette) packed in foil pouch, 1×3ml vial of sample diluents followed the instructions for
used.
Materials
Procedure (Rapid Screen Test Using Test Device)
Procedure for Whole Blood Samples
Bring the specimen and test components to room temperature
The seal was open by tearing along the notch, and the test device was remove from the pouch.
1 drop of whole blood was made in 1-2 drops of buffer was added to the sample well
Results was read within for 10-15 minutes.
It was ensured that the results was after 15 minutes to avoid error occurrence.
Procedure for Serum/Plasma Samples
The pouch was opened and pipetted 10μl of serum or plasma into the sample well
Immediately 2 drops of the Sample was diluted
The sample was dropped followed by buffer solution into the area while the results was appropriately
read within 15 minutes.
The test device (cassette) was placed on flat surface and the results were read within 15 minutes.
A positive test line appeared after 15 minutes and this is a False/Positive Result. Do not read the results after 15
minutes.
Page 375
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
Interpretation of the Test Result
The test results was read and interpreted within 15 minutes.
A red color band on test (T) and control (C) window, showed positive results (antigen detected) was indicated
of HEV antigen, in a negative result, a band appeared on the control (C) zone only, (antigen not detected).
If no (C) line is developed the assay is invalid regardless of color development on the (T) line or a total absence
of color in both region is an indication of procedure error and or the test reagent has been deteriorated.
Inclusion Criteria
All patients who are willing to give consent/assent
Exclusion Criteria
Patients vaccinated against HEV
Ethical Consideration
The ethical clearance for the study was obtained from the department of microbiology, Adamawa State
University, Mubi. Nigeria.
Sample Size Determination
The minimum sample size was calculated from a standard formula for calculation of minimum sample size,
(Navaneethan et al., 2008). The formula is as shown below;
n = (z
1
- a)
2
(p) (1-p)
d
2
Where:
n = minimum sample size
Z
1
- a = the value of standard normal deviation which is at 95% confidence intervals has been found to be
1.96
p = the estimate of the people prevalence obtained from literature review
d = the difference between the true population and the sample that can be tolerated, that is the absolute
precision required (in percentage point) on either side of the population.
At prevalence rate of 7%, (Osundare, et al., 2020). Using 5% precision at 95% confidence level, the minimum
sample size n for this study was calculated as follows: DATA:
Z1-a = 1.96
p = 7%= 0.07
d = 5.0% = 0.05
Therefore;
(1.96)² * (0.07) * (1-0.07)
(0.05) ²
Page 376
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
= 0.2499
0.0025
=99.9
n=100
Minimum sample size was 100.
Study Subjects
A total of 100 subjects was recruited for this study.
Study Design
A hospital-based cross-sectional study design
Study Limitations
This study was limited to adult HIV patients only.
RESULTS
One hundred (100) subjects whose informed consent has been obtained were recruited into the study. The study
accessed the Seroprevalence of hepatitis E virus among patients attending Federal Medical Centre, Mubi. Table
4.2 shows a demographic data of the study subjects. It shows that 28(28%) males and 72(72%) females with a
mean age of 36.40 ± 13.20 years participated in the study. The tables also revealed the distribution of hepatitis
E Virus among gender. It shows that 68(71%) females were hepatitis E negative while 27(29%) males were
hepatitis E negative and 4(83%) females were hepatitis E positive while only 1(17%) male was hepatitis E
positive as shown in Fig 4.2. It shows a non-significant difference (p=0.98).
The frequency of hepatitis E virus among study subjects. It shows that 94(94%) were hepatitis E negative while
6(6%) were hepatitis E positive as shown in Fig 4.1.
Table 4.1: According to Age Distribution of HEV
Age Group
(Years)
Total Participants
(n)
HEV Positive
(n)
HEV Negative
(n)
Percentage HEV
Positive (%)
10 19
10
1 (age 19)
9
10%
20 29
20
1 (age 25)
19
5%
30 39
30
1 (age 38)
29
3.3%
40 49
25
2 (ages 41,
44)
23
8%
50 59
10
0
10
0%
60 65
5
0
5
0%
Total
100
5
95
5%
Page 377
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
The age distribution of the study population shows the highest number of participants (30%) were within the
3039-year age group, followed by 25% in the 4049-year group. The lowest participation was recorded among
the 6065-year group (5%).
Out of the 100 participants, 5 tested positive for Hepatitis E Virus (HEV). These HEV-positive cases were
distributed across the younger to middle-age groups as follows:
One case (20%) occurred in the 1019 age group (age 19),
One case (20%) in the 2029 group (age 25),
One case (20%) in the 3039 group (age 38), and
Two cases (40%) in the 4049 group (ages 41 and 44).
No HEV-positive cases were recorded in participants aged 50 years and above.
These findings suggest that HEV infection was more commonly observed in individuals under the age of
50, with a notable clustering between the ages of 38 to 44 years. However, due to the small number of positive
cases (n = 5), statistical inference about age-specific risk is limited.
Table 4.2 Demographic distribution of Hepatitis E antibody positivity in gender
Gender
HEV (%)
Positive
Negative
Female
Male
4 (80)
1 (20)
68 (71)
27 (29)
Total
5 (100)
95 (10)
Table 4.2 presents the gender-based distribution of Hepatitis E virus (HEV) antibody positivity among 100
individuals tested. Of these, 72% were female and 28% male. Among the 5 individuals who tested positive, 4
(80%) were female, while 1 (20%) was male, indicating a higher prevalence of HEV antibodies in females.
Expected Frequencies (under null hypothesis of independence):
Degrees of freedom (df) = (2 - 1) (2 - 1) = 1
p-value ≈ 0.52
Interpretation of Statistical Test
Chi-square value (χ²) = 0.4064
Degrees of freedom = 1
p-value ≈ 0.52
Since p > 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis, indicating that:
There is no statistically significant association between gender and HEV seropositivity in this study
population.
Female, Positive = (72 × 6) / 100 = 4.32
Male, Positive = (28 × 6) / 100 = 1.68
o Mean age: 36.40 years
Page 378
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
o Standard deviation (SD): ±13.20 years
Fig 4.1: Frequency of Gender among Study Subjects
Fig 4.2: Distribution of Hepatitis E Virus Among Study Subjects
Fig 4.3: Distribution of Hepatitis E Virus among Gender of Study Subjects
DISCUSSION
Hepatitis E virus infection recently has been described as an emerging infection among patients with
immunosuppressing conditions of such human immunodeficiency infection, (kaba et al., 2022). In this study,
out of 100 participants we found a moderate (5%) of HEV among positive individuals attending FMC, Mubi.
Although this rate is higher than the previously reported among similar populations in the industrialized
countries. However, it’s in agreement with the study of who reported a lower significant rates of HEV infection
among some population groups HEV endemic areas of Africa and Asia. This study agreed with finding of
Omolade et al., (2018) who reported the prevalence of HEV infection found in this study is lower than the
previously reported rate of 44% among Health workers in Nigeria. Although the reason for this difference is not
clear, it has been suggested that “health care setting is a home for transmission of infection especially where
running water and other materials for hand hygiene are lacking”. Nosocomial transmission of HEV infection has
Frequency of Gender
Among Study Subjects
female
male
0
20
40
60
80
100
nagative positive
Distribution of Hepatitis E Virus Among
Study Subjects
0
100
Negative Positive
Distribution of Hepatitis E Virus
Among Gender of Study Subjects
Female Male
Page 379
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
also been reported, (kaba et al., 2022). This present study, demonstrated that majority 94(94%) of the study
subjects were hepatitis E virus. This study agrees with the report of Omolade et al., (2018) who stated that 18 of
the 2406 participant blood samples were reactive for HEV antibody. Viral hepatitis is a major cause of morbidity
and mortality globally. Various viral agents including Hepatitis A, B, C, D, E and G are known as causes of liver
diseases such as cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and liver failure. Hepatitis E disease is a self-limited feco-
orally transmitted acute viral infection that occurs most frequently in epidemic forms, (Purcell, 2020). The
aetiology of the disease is Hepatitis E Virus (HEV), a non-enveloped RNA virus belonging to the genus
hepevirus of the family Hepeviridae. The virus is transmitted from person to person feco-orally, hence its
transmission is highly associated with poor hygiene or sanitation, (Vasickova et al., 2007). While some studies
have shown that HEV infected individuals are not at higher risk of acquiring infection than the general
population, (Robson et al., 2020), they are at higher risk of developing chronic HEV infection, The
seroprevalence of HEV infection in the general population in Nigeria has not been determined, however, the
results of this study suggest the need to test for HEV infection in individuals for the early diagnosis and proper
management since HEV is known to be fulminant in the presence of underlying liver diseases that are common
among infected persons, according to Aggarwal and Gandhi, (2020).
CONCLUSION
The results of this study suggest the need to test for HEV infection in individuals for the early diagnosis and
proper management since HEV is known to be fulminant in the presence of underlying liver disease that is
common among HEV infected persons. In addition, the use of ART may reduce the incidence of HEV infection.
RECOMMENDATION
Its therefore recommended that Further studies are required to more clearly determine its prevalence and
incidence
Improve the understanding of its natural history and management, since HEV is known to be fulminant
in the presence of underlying liver diseases that are common among HEV Government and NGOS should
create more awareness in the community, Personal, water and environmental hygiene should be
encouraged in the community.
Information from this study may provide the need to implement surveillance and assess the hepatitis E
Burden in Nigeria.
The Author's Contributions
Ijudigal Musa Papka, David N. Bukbuk, and the author's supervision, writing, review, and editing are among
their contributions. Each author has reviewed and approved the published version of the work.
Finances: For this effort, no outside money was secured.
Notes: Papka I.M. edited the English text after D.N Bukbuk.
Authored it.
No conflicts of interest have been disclosed by the authors.
REFERENCES
1. Abravanel, F., Chapuy-Regaud, S., Lhomme, S., Dubois, M., Peron, J. M., Alric, L., Izopet, J. (2020).
Performance of two commercial assays for detecting hepatitis E virus RNA in acute or chronic infections.
Journal of clinical Microbiology, 51(6), 1913-1916.
Page 380
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
2. Aggarwal, R., Gandhi, S. (2020). The global prevalence of hepatitis E virus infection and susceptibility:
a systematic review. Geneva: World Health Organization.
3. Kaba, H. Richet, I. Ravaux, J. Moreau, I. Poizot-Mar- tin, A. Motte et al., (2022) “Hepatitis E Virus
Infection in Pa- tients Infected with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus,” Journal of Medical Virology,
Vol. 83, No. 10, pp. 1704-1716.
4. Kamar, N., Selves, J., Mansuy, J. M., Ouezzani, L., Péron, J. M., Guitard, J., Rostaing, L. (2008).
Hepatitis E virus and chronic hepatitis in organ- transplant recipients. New England Journal of Medicine,
358(8), 811-817.
5. Kumar, M., Sharma, B. C., Sarin, S. K. (2022). Hepatitis E virus as an etiology of acute exacerbation of
previously unrecognized asymptomatic patients with hepatitis B virus‐related chronic liver disease.
Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 23(6), 883-887.
6. Labrique, A. B; Zaman, K.; Hossain, Z. Saha, P; Yunus, M. and Hossain, A. ( 2020) Epidemiology and
Risk Factors of In- cident Hepatitis E Virus Infections in Rural Bangladesh,” American Journal
Epidemiology, Vol. 172, No. 8, pp. 952-961.
7. Mushahwar, I. K. (2008). Hepatitis E virus: molecular virology, clinical features, diagnosis,
transmission, epidemiology, and prevention. Journal of medical virology, 80(4), 646-658.
8. Navaneethan, U., Al Mohajer, M., Shata, M. T. (2008). Hepatitis E and pregnancy: understanding the
pathogenesis. Liver international, 28(9), 1190-1199.
9. Omolade, S. O., Odaibo, G. N., Olaleye, O. D., Ayoola, E. A. (2022). Hepatitis B and E viral infection
among Nigerian healthcare workers.
10. Osundare, F. A., Klink, P., Majer, C., Akanbi, O. A., Wang, B., Faber, M., Opaleye, O. O. (2020).
Hepatitis E virus seroprevalence and associated risk factors in apparently healthy individuals from Osun
State, Nigeria. Pathogens, 9(5), 392.
11. Purcell, R. H., Emerson, S. U. (2020). Hepatitis E: an emerging awareness of an old disease. Journal of
hepatology, 48(3), 494-503.
12. Purdy, M. A., Harrison, T. J., Jameel, S., Meng, X. J., Okamoto, H., Van der Poel, W. H. M., Smith, D.
B. Ictv Report C. (2017). ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Hepeviridae. Journal of General Virology, 98,
2645-2646.
13. Robson, S. Adams, N. Brink, B. Woodruff and D. Bradley, (2020). “Hospital Outbreak of Hepatitis E,
Lancet, Vol. 339, No. 8806, pp. 1424-1425
14. Vasickova, P., Psikal, I., Widen, F., Smitalova, R., Bendova, J., Pavlik, I., Kralik, P. (2022). Detection
and genetic characterisation of hepatitis E virus in Czech pig production herds. Research in veterinary
science, 87(1), 143-148.