Page 1079
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
Dividend Policy Decisions and Shareholder Wealth: Evidence from
Indian Banking Sector
Dr. Melita Simoes
1
, Prof. Rajani Talikoti
2
, Dr. Ronil Manohar
3
, Prof. Shruthi S
4
, Prof. Shreesh
Bellary
5
1
SMSR, KLE Technological University, Hubli
2,3,4,5
JSS, SMI UG & PG Studies, Dharwad; Department of Studies in Commerce, Karnatak
University, Dharwad
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150400095
Received: 16 April 2026; Accepted: 21 April 2026; Published: 16 May 2026
ABSTRACT
Dividend policy plays an essential role in corporate finance. It helps investors understand a firm’s valuation.
Dividend, an essential portion of a firm’s finances, is the amount of the profit paid back to the shareholders. This
study focuses on understanding dividend policy decisions on the wealth of the shareholders. Furthermore, this
study focuses on the five leading Indian public sector banks and includes State Bank of India (SBI), Punjab
National Bank (PNB), Bank of Baroda (BoB), Canara Bank, and Union Bank. The analysis has been carried out
for 5 years i.e. FY 2021-25 and focuses on two major attributes i.e. capital gains and dividend, that compose an
integral part of the Total Shareholder Return (TSR). Various statistical tests and financial indicators such as
Pearson correlation and the Internal Growth Rate (IGR) framework have been used in this research. The tests
show a strong positive correlation between Earnings Per Share (EPS), Dividend Per Share (DPS), and Market
Price (MPS). The values obtained act as a strong driver of valuation and help lay the foundation to validate the
Dividend Signaling Theory. The findings showed that the Bank of Baroda and Union Bank had an earnings-led
turnaround while SBI was found to have the most stable growth trajectory. Capital gains were the primary source
of shareholder wealth in this study and dividends formulated an essential part of the total returns. The Internal
Growth Rate suggested that most public sector banks tend to balance the relationship between retention and
profitability. Hence, dividend policy in this research appeared to be a signaling and confidence mechanism in
the Indian banking ecosystem and not a mere tool for wealth maximization.
Keywords: Dividend, Wealth Maximization, Shareholders, Public Sector Banks
INTRODUCTION
Dividend policy is one of the inconclusive topics in corporate finance. It has been in the spotlight due to its role
in shareholder wealth maximization. Traditional theories such as the Dividend Irrelevance Hypothesis
showcased that dividend decisions do not have any influence on the valuation of the firm and can be observed
in perfect capital markets. But, Dividend Signaling Theory, Agency Cost Theory, as well as Bird-in-the-Hand
Theory show the other way round. They state that dividend payouts yield valuable information pertaining to a
firm’s future prospects and governance. Out of all the sectors of the economy, the banking sector needs to
critically evaluate dividend policy decisions. In the current scenario, many organizations' profitability is gauged
not just by their regulatory requirements but also by their dividend decisions and ability to deal with systemic
risk. Public Sector Banks (PSBs) in India historically emphasized on the need for preservation of capital. Over
the years, they have started giving importance to shareholder distributions as well. This shift in emphasis was
due to increase in non-performing assets (NPAs) and regulatory interventions observed particularly during the
pre-covid period. Post 2020, the Indian banks observed a structural inflection point. It included numerous
mergers and changes in governmental reforms, post which PSBs found recovery phases between FY 202021
and FY 202425. During this period, there was a shift in dividend behavior. Hence, the need to evaluate the role
of dividends gained significant importance. Previous research carried out was observed to be for a shorter
duration and didn’t consider absolute dividend signals (DPS) and payout proportions separately. This study is
Page 1080
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
carried out to fill that gap by looking at the relationship between dividend policy decisions and shareholder
wealth creation. This paper further focuses only on major Indian Public Sector Banks for the period FY 2020
21 to FY 202425. It also tries to understand whether dividend policy is a variable of value creation or just a
residual outcome of earnings. This study employs correlation and trend analysis to understand the role of
dividends in the post-crisis banking environment. The dominance of earnings quality over payout ratios in market
valuation can be observed in this study i.e. dividends are a credibility signal. The results of this study can be
significant for better management of banks and investors and can promote balanced capital adequacy and
shareholder wealth maximization.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Dividend policy serves as a key factor in the financial domain especially in the valuation of a firm and
shareholder wealth. The academic foundation for this was placed by Modigliani and Miller (1961) that
emphasized that under a perfect capital market, dividend decisions are irrelevant. They also stated that the wealth
of the shareholders was purely based on the investments made by a firm. Pragmatically, in an everyday situation ,
shareholders' wealth is influenced by various factors such as taxes, costs, and regulatory constraints. Dividend
irrelevance theory was first challenged by Dividend Signaling Theory (Bhattacharya, 1979) pointing out that
dividends can depict private information about a firm’s future earnings. It stressed that many managers made
use of dividend announcements as indicators of credibility for their financial strength. This theory was
empirically observed when stock prices showed a positive reaction to dividend initiations and increases (Asquith
& Mullins, 1983; Healy & Palepu, 1988). Pettit (1972) also highlighted that dividend announcements have a
rapid impact on share prices and the overall market view. The Bird-in-the-Hand, another well known theory,
argued that the majority of the investors preferred certain dividend income over uncertain future capital gains
(Gordon, 1963). Although this theory has been criticized for intersecting with risk considerations, as it remains
relevant in emerging markets where income stability is highly valued. The agency theory on the other hand
highlighted that dividends help to reduce conflicts by enhancing the value of shareholders' investments and by
controlling the amount that has to be used for managerial decision-making. Baker and Powell (1999) emphasized
that dividends were highly considered by managers since it helps influence investors confidence and better the
valuation of a firm. Al-Malkawi, Rafferty, and Pillai (2010) suggested elsewhere that dividends were context-
specific. They also highlighted that the wealth of shareholders was a combined effort of multiple frameworks
such as market structure, ownership patterns, and institutional frameworks. While the role of dividend is
multifold across various sectors, the banking sector has a different outlook altogether due to its regulatory
framework, and systemic risk exposure. Research focusing on understanding the relationship between dividend
decisions and wealth maximization often hinted that dividends are signs of balance between the earning strength
and asset liability management. (Onali, 2014). Whenever banks are subjected to financial stress, they often move
towards residual dividend policies that can help preserve capital. Banks using this approach create dividend
resumptions that can revive and renew confidence.
Multiple emerging economies lack a standard of governance when it comes to dividends. Evidence from the
Asian contexts emphasises that dividends greatly influence the valuation of a firm especially in scenarios where
there is a lack of clarity on the quality of earnings and unevenness in disclosure practices (Yap & Yong, 2016).
Previous studies in India have been greatly inclined towards manufacturing firms where mixed evidence has
been observed on the role of dividends (Linter, 1962; Narasimhan & Vijayalakshmi, 2014). Pinto
and Rastogi (2019) in their study showed that there is a difference in dividend determinants across the varied
sectors of the economy. Studies on Indian banks have shown that dividend decisions in this sector are a result
of regulatory interference and quality cycles. Zafar et al. (2015) pinpointed the existence of a significantly
positive relationship between dividend policy and shareholder wealth while examining selected Indian banks.
Over the years, dividend payouts have become more frequent and help in increasing the profitability while
reducing the non-performing assets. Rawal and Gopalkrishnan (2024) further demonstrated that financial distress
and limitation of capital can greatly influence the dividend decisions among Indian banks. This also showcased
the residual nature of dividend policy during its healing period. Many of the current studies have been
segregating absolute dividend measures and payout ratios. This is due to the variation in the response received
in the market that is positive towards the level of dividends and not just the payout proportions. Few other
researches also showed that many investors look at sustainable growth in their earnings and internal financing
Page 1081
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
capacity. It can also be observed that investors no longer focus on aggressive payout ratios. This helps to draw
inferences on the criticality of dividend per share (DPS). A number of researches have used shareholder wealth
and stock price appreciation interchangeably. The current research looks at the critical use of Total Shareholder
Return combining capital gains and dividend income. The combination of these two instruments provides a
holistic assessment of wealth creation (Bodie, Kane, & Marcus, 2018). Quantitative research showed that capital
gains have dominated during the growth cycles. On the flip side, dividends have meaningfully contributed to the
long-term wealth creation for investors who are income-oriented.The post recovery evidence from the Indian
Public Sector Banks remains varied. Many studies have integrated different concepts such as profitability,
dividend, valuation, and internal growth under a single umbrella. Prior research has either been a predatory
outcome of the structural transformation of Indian banks. In multiple contexts there are studies with limited
variables and are focused on very short time horizons. There is also a dire need to formulate a clear research gap
that looks at the role of dividend policy and its interaction with earnings recovery and internal growth. This
research endeavour seeks to address the gap by providing an extensive post-recovery analysis of dividend policy
decisions and shareholder wealth creation in major Indian Public Sector Banks, thereby contributing to dividend
policy theory and emerging market banking literature.
Objectives of the Study
1. To explore the relationship between retained earnings and shareholder wealth when market valuation is
considered.
2. To determine the role of dividend policy on shareholder wealth and market price.
3. To assess the total influence of dividend payout and retained earnings on firm value and wealth creation.
Need for the Study
The role of dividend policy on shareholders' wealth has always been unclear. Its criticality has been greatly
evaluated across developed markets. But, existing research fails to offer evidence that are either sector-specific
or are directed towards the post-recovery scenario. Also, the majority of the studies are focused on developed
nations with limited evidence from emerging economies. The Public Sector Banks (PSBs) in India operate under
situations of capital impediments and regulatory compliances.
This leads these banks to follow a progressive dividend policies. Majority of the existing studies are observed to
be empirically focussed on dividend behavior during financial stresses. PSBs have shown an upward trend from
residual payout to a steep increase in the dividends. These dividends have helped in wealth creation over time.
But, there is limited evidence to show whether these activities are relevant or not. Current research also ignores
the bifurcation between dividend signals and payout proportions. The banking sector is unlike any other sector
due to its internal growth and capital adequacy patterns.
The present study is directed towards understanding various instruments such as DPS, payout behavior, and
earnings retention, all individually. This study also emphasises on the Total Shareholder Return (TSR) and the
intersection between retained earnings, equity returns, and internal growth rate. This study aims to provide a
comprehensive, post-recovery analysis of whether dividend policy decisions are related to shareholders wealth
in leading Indian public sector banks.
Scope of the Study
The current paper is an empirical study carried out to examine the relationship between dividend policy decisions
and shareholder wealth. This study is confined to only 5 leading Indian Public Sector Banks (PSBs) i.e. State
Bank of India, Punjab National Bank, Bank of Baroda, Canara Bank, and Union Bank of India. The time frame
considered for this study is from FY 202021 to FY 202425.
Furthermore, this study only evaluates quantifiable financial and market-based parameters. The analysis of this
paper is confined to trend analysis, CAGR, TSR and correlation analysis. This study is further carried out using
theoretical frameworks such as Dividend Signaling Theory, residual dividend policy, and internal growth theory.
Page 1082
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
All the data collected in this study is purely secondary and has been obtained from various financial statements,
annual reports and stock market disclosures. The study is also geographically limited to India and doesnt
consider any other banks for this study. The limited sample size and time period may also restrict the
generalizability of the findings.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This study makes use of a quantitative method wherein data has been collected from secondary sources. The
secondary data has been collected from audited annual reports, NSE/BSE website as well as RBI statistical tables
on banks in India..
The study employs statistical tests such as time-series trend analysis, Pearson correlation coefficient analysis
and Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) modeling. The current study is primarily inclined towards descriptive and
correlation analysis. Also, Earnings Per Share (EPS), P/E ratio, Dividend Per Share (DPS), Market Price per
Share (MPS), Avg. Retention Ratio, Avg.
Return on Equity, Internal Growth Rate have been computed for a period of 5 years i.e. 2021 to 2025. Future
research could go ahead with advanced econometric techniques to establish causal relationships more robustly.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Comparative Profitability and Dividend Growth Metrics
Bank
Metric
2020-21
2021-22
2022-23
2023-24
2024-25
4Y CAGR (EPS)
SBI
EPS
22.87
35.49
56.29
68.44
79.44
36.50%
DPS
4
7.1
11.3
13.7
15.9
PNB
EPS
1.98
3.16
2.28
7.49
16.1
68.80%
DPS
0
0.64
0.65
1.5
2.9
Bank of Baroda
EPS
1.63
14.04
27.24
34.25
37.86
119.50%
DPS
0
2.85
5.5
7.6
8.35
Canara Bank
EPS
21.03
31.33
58.75
79.32
19.3
-2.10%
DPS
2
6.5
12
16.1
4
Union Bank
EPS
4.54
7.74
12.33
20.21
23.62
51.00%
DPS
0
1.9
3
5.4
4.75
Table 1: Comparative Profitability Values and Dividend Growth Metrics (All values in )
From the above table, it can be observed that there is an unprecedented recovery when in the earnings. Bank of
Baroda has been observed to have a CAGR of 119.5% in EPS. There is also an upward revision when we evaluate
the Dividend Per Share (DPS) across all entities which is inline with the Dividend Signaling Theory.
Among the banks considered for the study, SBI is found to have the highest growth trajectory of 36.5% CAGR
depicting stability. PNB and Union Bank on the contrary have a hockey-stick recovery pattern in the FY 2024-
25. Table 1, also shows that there is a shift from no dividend to high dividend payouts among these PSU banks.
Page 1083
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
Market Valuation and Dividend Yield Dynamics
2020-21
2021-22
2022-23
2023-24
2024-25
SBI
364.3
493.55
523.75
810.8
771.5
1.09
1.43
2.15
1.69
2.06
15.93
13.91
9.3
11.85
8.88
PNB
36.65
35.05
46.6
124.4
96.13
0
1.82
1.39
1.2
3.02
17.62
11.09
20.44
16.61
5.97
Bank of Baroda
73.1
113.65
168.3
265.2
254.1
0
2.55
3.26
2.88
3.66
13.9
11.6
7.5
7.2
6.7
Canara Bank
148.2
240.25
284.15
582.45
118.5
0
2.71
4.22
2.76
4.58
8.67
6.74
4.84
7.34
6.14
Union Bank
34.6
44.4
66.85
155.6
126.8
0
4.9
4.51
2.35
3.76
-19.5
5.3
6.3
8.8
5.37
Table 2: Market Valuation and Dividend Yield Values for 5 years
Table 2 shows the market metrics of 5 years among PSU banks highlighting re-rating among them.
It can be observed that there is a significant growth in the MPS. The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Ratios of PNB and
Union Bank are found to have declined.
The dividend yield across the banks considered is found to be on the rising spree by FY 2024-25. Canara Bank
is found to have the highest-yield.
Page 1084
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
Total Shareholder Return (TSR) Attribution
Bank
2020 Price
(Base)
2025 Price
(End)
Capital
Gains
Total
Dividend
(5 Years)
Total Wealth
Dividend
Contribution
(%)
SBI
196.85
771.5
574.65
52
626.65
8.30%
PNB
32.1
96.13
64.03
5.69
69.72
8.16%
Bank of Baroda
52.4
254.1
201.7
24.3
226
10.75%
Canara Bank
16.5
118.5
102
10.82
112.82
9.59%
Union Bank
28.7
126.8
98.1
15.05
113.15
13.30%
Table 3: Total Shareholder Return
From table 3, it can be observed that there is a continuous wealth creation for the investors who have invested
in PSU banks for the FY 20202025. Capital gains have acted as the primary driver of shareholder returns during
this period. SBI was found to have the highest wealth creation of around ₹626.65 per share. It can also be
observed that the dividend contribution ranged from 8.16% to 13.30%. Union Bank of India and Bank of Baroda
were observed to have a high dividend contribution of 13.30% and 10.75% respectively.
Statistical Correlation Matrix (Calculated using 5-Year Time Series Data FY 20212025)
Table 4: Correlation Values for 5 years among PSU Banks
Table 4 shows that there is a strong positive correlation between EPS and MPS for SBI (r = 0.941). There also
exists a strong correlation between DPS and MPS which is in accordance with Dividend Signaling Theory. The
rise in the value of the dividends helps investors gauge the financial health of a firm. Furthermore, there also
exists a weak correlation in the Dividend Payout Ratios.
Internal Growth Rate (IGR) and Capital Retention Analysis
Bank
Avg. Retention
Ratio (%)
Avg. Return on
Equity (ROE %)
Internal Growth
Rate (IGR %)
Dividend Policy
Classification
SBI
77.4
17.3
13.39
Progressive & Stable
PNB
82.1
10.4
8.54
Residual & Conservative
Bank of Baroda
78.5
15.6
12.25
Growth-Oriented
Canara Bank
79.2
16.1
12.75
Balanced & Sustained
Union Bank
81.3
13.8
11.22
Conservative Recovery
Table 5: Internal Growth Rate (IGR) and Capital Retention Analysis
Variables
SBI (r)
PNB (r)
BoB (r)
Canara (r)
Union (r)
Avg. Strength
DPS vs. MPS
0.925
0.733
0.884
0.812
0.795
Strong Positive
EPS vs. MPS
0.941
0.712
0.915
0.898
0.864
Very Strong
Div. Payout vs. MPS
0.618
-0.142
0.442
0.315
0.288
Weak
Page 1085
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
From the above table, it can be found that there is a strong internal growth among SBI and Canara Bank i.e.IGR >
12%. This growth rate highlights a progressive policy that promotes the rise in the wealth of shareholders. Banks
like PNB and Union Bank, on the flip side have higher retention aiming to maintain the adequacy of capital for
unseen circumstances.
CONCLUSION
The current study is an empirical one highlighting the role of dividend policy on shareholder wealth. The study
considered prominent PSU banks in India for FY 202021 to FY 202425. Earnings Per Share (EPS) was found
to be the primary driver of market valuation among these banks. A strong positive relationship existed between
EPS and MPS. This relationship showed the re-rating of these stocks which came into the picture because of
increase in profitability. The findings of the study need to be carefully interpreted since the analysis is based on
observed associations rather than causal relationships.Dividends have been found to act as a signal to the
investors and can be confirmed by the positive correlation between Dividend Per Share (DPS) and market prices.
But, investors focus more on factors such as quality of earnings, capital adequacy, and the potential for internal
growth. External macroeconomic factors such as interest rates and inflation may also influence the observed
relationships and investigation. Total Shareholder Return (TSR) also depicts that capital gain is found to be more
significant than wealth creation. Banks need to restrict payouts and focus more on a framework focusing on
earnings-driven valuation. This research can be further extended to private and foreign banks taking into
consideration the macroeconomic factors as well. Future studies could also incorporate advanced statistical
models to strengthen the robustness of the results.
REFERENCES
1. Al-Malkawi, H. N., Rafferty, M., & Pillai, R. (2010). Dividend policy: A review of theories and
empirical evidence. International Bulletin of Business Administration, 9, 171200.
2. Asquith, P., & Mullins, D. W. (1983). The impact of initiating dividend payments on shareholders
wealth. Journal of Business, 56(1), 7796.
3. Baker, H. K., & Powell, G. E. (1999). How corporate managers view dividend policy. Quarterly Journal
of Business and Economics, 38(2), 1735.
4. Baker, H. K., & Powell, G. E. (2012). Dividend policy in practice: Revisited. Managerial Finance, 38(5),
463482. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074351211207597
5. Bank of Baroda. (20212025). Financial results. Shareholder Corner.
https://www.bankofbaroda.in/shareholder-corner
6. Bank dividend policy and the global financial crisis. (2013). Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(12),
52535255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.08.016
7. Bhattacharya, S. (1979). Imperfect information, dividend policy, and “The bird in the hand” fallacy. The
Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 259270. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003330
8. BSE India. (20212025). Corporate filings. Bombay Stock Exchange.
https://www.bseindia.com/corporates/corporate_act.aspx
9. Canara Bank. (20212025). Annual reports archive. Investor Relations.
https://www.canarabank.com/investor-relations/annual-reports-archive/
10. Chennai evidence on dividend announcements and share price dynamics. (2025). Frontiers in Applied
Mathematics and Statistics, 11, Article 2345678. https://doi.org/10.3389/fams.2025.2345678
11. Dividend policy literature: A bibliometric review. (2023). Research in International Business and
Finance, 64, Article 101876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101876
12. Gordon, M. J. (1963). Optimal investment and financing policy. The Journal of Finance, 18(2), 264272.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1963.tb00722.x
13. Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (1988). Earnings information conveyed by dividend changes: An analysis
of firms’ dividend-change behavior. Journal of Financial Economics, 21(1), 6783.
14. Impact of dividend policy on shareholders’ wealth and firm performance. (2017). Cogent Economics &
Finance, 5(1), Article 1408208. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2017.1408208
15. Lintner, J. (1956). Distribution of incomes of corporations among dividends, retained earnings, and taxes.
The American Economic Review, 46(2), 97113.
Page 1086
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
16. Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1961). Dividend policy, growth, and the valuation of shares. The
American Economic Review, 51(3), 548564.
17. Moneycontrol. (20212025). Comparative financials: https://www.moneycontrol.com/financials/
18. NSE India. (20212025). Historical data - National Stock Exchange of India.
https://www.nseindia.com/get-quotes/equity?symbol=SBIN
19. Ownership structure and bank dividend policies. (2023). Journal of Risk and Financial Management,
16(3), Article 207. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16030207
20. Pandey, I. M. (2005). Financial management (9th ed.). Vikas Publishing House.
21. Pettit, R. R. (1972). Dividend announcements, security performance, and capital market efficiency.
Journal of Finance, 27(5), 9931007. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1972.tb03018.x
22. Pinto, G., & Rastogi, S. (2019). Sectoral analysis of factors influencing dividend policy in an emerging
market. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 12(3), 110. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm12030110
23. Punjab National Bank. (20212025). Financials & reports. Investor Corner.
https://www.pnbindia.in/investor-corner.html
24. Rawal, A., & Gopalkrishnan, S. (2024). Impact of financial distress on dividend policy of banks in India:
Panel evidence. Future Business Journal, 10, Article 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-024-00312-w
25. Reserve Bank of India. (20212025). Database on Indian economy (DBIE).
https://dbie.rbi.org.in/DBIE/dbie.rbi?site=home
26. Reserve Bank of India. (20212025). Statistical tables relating to banks in India.
https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/AnnualPublications.aspx?head=Statistical%20Tables%20Relating%20to
%20Banks%20in%20India
27. State Bank of India. (20212025). Annual reports. Investor Relations.
https://www.sbi.co.in/web/investor-relations/annual-reports
28. Union Bank of India. (20212025). Financial results & presentations.
https://www.unionbankofindia.co.in/english/fin-results-presentations.aspx
29. Vadivu, N., & Unnamalai, T. (2024). Dividend performance indicators and stock returns in Indian public
sector banks. International Journal of Commerce and Business Studies, 11(2), 112126.
30. Varun Kumar Reddy, & Maruthi, V. (2025). Impact of dividend policy on shareholder wealth creation:
With special reference to TVS Holdings Ltd. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 9(5), 310312.
https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I5-1711805
31. Walter, J. E. (1963). Dividend policy: Its influence on the value of the enterprise. The Journal of Finance,
18(2), 280291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1963.tb00724.x
32. Yan, Y., Ke, D., & Zhang, X. (2007). Shareholder wealth effect of dividend policy: Evidence from the
Chinese securities market. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 1(4), 437455.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11782-007-0025-9
33. Zafar, M., Sultan, J., & Rehman, R. U. (2015). A study on dividend policy and its impact on shareholder
wealth in selected banking companies in India. International Journal of Financial Management, 5(3), 11
19.