Page 1113
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
Effect of Digital Transformation on the Performance of Supply
Chain in Apapa Port, Lagos State.
Ogubuike Chimuche Gladys
1
, Nicholas Clement Ekanem
2
, Prof. Suleiman A. S. Aruwa
3
1,2
PhD Procurement Management Student
1,2,3
Institute of Governance and Development Studies, Nasarawa State University, Keffi-Nigeria.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150400098
Received: 15 April 2026; Accepted: 20 April 2026; Published: 16 May 2026
ABSTRACT
Digital transformation is fundamentally re-engineering global trade, with its application in port logistics being
critical for enhancing supply chain performance. This study examined the effect of digital transformation
specifically Port Community Systems Implementation (PCSI), Automation of Cargo Handling (AOCH), Digital
Customs Clearance System (DCCS), and Use of IoT for Tracking and Monitoring (IOTM) on Supply Chain
Performance (PFSC) at Apapa Port, Lagos State. In this study, supply chain performance is evaluated using three
metrics: average cargo dwell time, port throughput and berth productivity, and supply chain reliability. Using a
cross-sectional survey design, data were collected from 153 key stakeholders across four critical departments
via structured questionnaires administered through Google Forms. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation
Modelling (PLS-SEM) was employed to analyze the data, revealing that Use of IoT for Tracking and Monitoring
(β = 0.394, p < 0.001) and Digital Customs Clearance System (β = 0.191, p = 0.038) significantly affect supply
chain performance, while Port Community Systems Implementation (β = 0.118, p = 0.190) and Automation of
Cargo Handling (β = 0.055, p = 0.573) had no significant effect. Collectively, these digital transformation
variables explain 68.5% of the variance in supply chain performance (R² = 0.685). While PCSI and AOCH were
perceived positively, they did not translate into measurable performance gains. This study concluded that real-
time visibility and process automation are pivotal to reducing dwell time, enhancing throughput, and ensuring
delivery reliability during port operations. Recommendations for Apapa Port include prioritizing IoT deployment
and digital customs integration, strengthening stakeholder collaboration for PCS, and upgrading automation
infrastructure with reliable power and maintenance systems to bolster overall supply chain resilience.
Keywords: Supply Chain Performance, Digital Transformation, Port Community Systems, Automation of
Cargo Handling, Digital Customs Clearance, IoT Tracking and Monitoring.
INTRODUCTION
The global trade landscape is undergoing a profound metamorphosis, driven by the rapid integration of Digital
Transformation (DT) technologies across complex logistical networks. DT, defined by Zhou (2024) as the
embedding of digitalization to break physical resource barriers, enabling real-time data sharing and process
automation, is fundamentally reshaping supply chain dynamics from traditional linear models to interconnected
ecosystems (Lindquist, 2023). Globally, this shift aims to achieve superior efficiency and resilience. For
instance, advanced Digital Transformation solutions like Internet of Things tracking and process automation are
directly correlated with improved flexibility coefficients in logistics (Zhou, 2024). Furthermore, digital supply
chains are recognized for their enhanced responsiveness, allowing prompt adaptation to market volatility and
risks through instant decision-making facilitated by big data analytics (Nguyen et al., 2025). The performance
of a supply chain holistically measured by efficiency, effectiveness, and competitiveness (Putri et al., 2019) is
now contingent upon the successful deployment of technologies like port community systems, automation of
cargo handling, digital customs clearance systems, and the use of internet of things for tracking and monitoring.
This global trend underscored that the effectiveness of a modern supply chain is intrinsically linked to its digital
maturity. Within the Nigerian context, these digital initiatives are being implemented against a backdrop of
Page 1114
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
significant macroeconomic instability and inadequate infrastructure, which Okegbemi (2024) identified as
primary factors suppressing overall national growth and sustainable development.
In the African context, the successful implementation of digital platforms, such as the Digital Customs Clearance
System, has been shown to directly influence trade efficiency (Sarker, 2025). In Tanzania, automated customs
clearance systems demonstrated significant improvements, with regression showing a 0.42-unit increase in trade
efficiency per unit reduction in clearance time (Hamisi, 2024). The Apapa Port Complex in Lagos State, as the
nation's busiest maritime gateway, stands at the epicenter of Nigeria's trade facilitation efforts. This direct link
shows how a Digital Customs Clearance System impacts efficiency metrics, which are proxies for overall Supply
Chain Performance. Similarly, within Nigerian ports, prior research on related components, such as the effect of
cargo handling equipment (a subset of Automation of Cargo Handling), has shown a significant impact on
automation yielded a strong reduction (Okpara, 2022). This localized evidence confirmed that specific digital
transformation components can yield measurable operational improvements. The implementation of Port
Community Systems is also recognized as a vital step for African ports seeking to streamline administrative
processes and enhance Supply Chain Reliability by integrating scattered stakeholder data (Mthembu &
Chasomeris, 2022).
The adoption of internet of things for tracking and monitoring in Nigerian firms has also shown a strong
correlation with improved Supply Chain Management performance, indicating that real-time data acquisition is
important for resilience and planning (Olota et al., 2023). Digital Transformation, comprising port community
systems implementation, automation of cargo handling, digital customs clearance systems, and the use of internet
of things for tracking and monitoring, represents the primary pathway to overcoming these structural bottlenecks.
For instance, the goal of reducing the average dwell time of cargo, the time goods spend idling at the port is
directly targeted by automation of cargo handling (Okpara, 2022) and the acceleration of document processing
via a functional Digital Customs Clearance System (Salau, 2020). Moreover, the reliability aspect of supply
chain performance, measured by delivery schedule adherence, hinges on port community systems
implementation (Bin Aifan et al., 2025) and internet of things for Tracking and Monitoring (Zhou, 2024) to
provide the necessary real-time data sharing and coordination among the numerous stakeholders shipping lines,
terminal operators, and customs agencies operating within the congested Apapa ecosystem. This study, therefore,
focuses on empirically establishing the specific relationship between these four facets of Digital Transformation
and the three-performance metrics of the Apapa Port supply chain.
Statement of the Problem
The efficiency of the Apapa Port supply chain, the primary maritime gateway for Nigeria, remains sub-optimal,
characterized by persistently high Average Cargo Dwell Times, fluctuations in Port Throughput, and a general
failure in Delivery Schedule Adherence (a measure of Supply Chain Reliability). These inefficiencies translate
directly into increased logistics costs, reduced national trade competitiveness, and significant economic friction
for businesses relying on timely cargo movement. The persistent delays and low productivity indicators
challenge the national economic goals of trade facilitation and ease of doing business, often resulting in diverted
cargo, which further limits the port's revenue and capacity to operate effectively. While global and regional
literature confirms that Digital Transformation is the definitive solution to these systemic issues, the specific
deployment and resultant impact of its core components, Port Community Systems Implementation, Automation
of Cargo Handling, Digital Customs Clearance Systems, and Internet of Things for Tracking and Monitoring
within the unique operational and regulatory environment of Apapa Port remains insufficiently quantified and
understood.
The problem of this research is the gap between the theoretical potential of digital transformation to enhance
port performance and the observable, persistent operational underperformance at the Apapa Port Complex.
Existing Nigerian studies often focus on isolated equipment (Okpara, 2022) or general information technology
adoption (Ezekwueme et al., 2024) but fail to holistically assess the integrated effect of a mature Digital
Transformation framework on the key supply chain performance outcomes: dwell time, throughput, and
reliability. Specifically, there is a lack of empirical evidence in the Nigerian context demonstrating how the
synergy between, for example, Digital Customs Clearance Systems acceleration and Internet of Things visibility
Page 1115
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
directly translates into reduced cargo dwell time or improved berth productivity, as demonstrated elsewhere (Li
et al., 2025; Hamisi, 2024). This research is necessitated by the need to provide evidence-based
recommendations to port operators and regulatory bodies, such as the Nigerian Ports Authority and the Nigeria
Customs Service, to prioritize and strategically invest in the most impactful Digital Transformation levers to
unlock immediate and sustainable improvements in the supply chain performance of Apapa Port. Without such
evidence, investment decisions remain reactive and fragmented, failing to address the interconnected nature of
the port's operational challenges. The specific objectives of this study are to:
i. Determine the effect of Port Community Systems Implementation on the performance of the supply chain
at Apapa Port, Lagos State.
ii. Evaluate the effect of Automation of Cargo Handling on the performance of the supply chain at Apapa
Port, Lagos State.
iii. Assess the effect of Digital Customs Clearance System on the performance of the supply chain at Apapa
Port, Lagos State.
iv. Examine the effect of the Use of IoT for Tracking and Monitoring on the performance of the supply chain
at Apapa Port, Lagos State.
The null hypotheses for the study are as follows:
H₀₁: Port Community Systems Implementation has no significant effect on the performance of the supply chain
at Apapa Port, Lagos State.
H₀₂: Automation of Cargo Handling has no significant effect on the performance of the supply chain at Apapa
Port, Lagos State.
H₀₃: Digital Customs Clearance System has no significant effect on the performance of the supply chain at
Apapa Port, Lagos State.
H₀₄: Use of IoT for Tracking and Monitoring has no significant effect on the performance of the supply chain
at Apapa Port, Lagos State.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Conceptual Review
Supply Chain Performance
Supply Chain Performance measures the effectiveness and efficiency of integrated processes for trade. Supply
Chain Performance (SCP) is defined by Putri et al. (2019) as a holistic measurement system evaluating the
efficiency, effectiveness, and competitiveness across integrated processes from suppliers to customers. Zhang
and Okoroafo (2015) more concisely state that SCP is the ability of the supply chain to deliver the right product
to the correct location at the appropriate time at the lowest logistics cost. Furthermore, SCP is described by Ning
and Yao (2023) as the effectiveness of integrated processes, measured by efficiency, responsiveness, and
flexibility outcomes in global trade networks. Whitten et al. (2012) added that performance enables providing
products of appropriate quality while minimizing total costs to the final customer. Blending these definitions,
SCP involves evaluating the flow of goods, information, and resources against predetermined metrics of
timeliness, cost, and reliability (Beamon, 1999; Gunasekaran et al., 2004). The significance of SCP lies in its
direct link to global competitiveness and port operational resilience (He et al., 2023). For the Apapa Port supply
chain, Digital Transformation (DT) is designed to improve these metrics, shifting from linear to networked
models to reduce lead times and enhance reliability (Lindquist, 2023).
Page 1116
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
In this study, SCP is measured through three key metrics: Average Dwell Time of Cargo, which indicates how
quickly goods are processed (Zhou, 2024); Port Throughput and Berth Productivity (GCMH/VTT), which
measures the volume of cargo handled per unit of time (Putri et al., 2019; Gunasekaran et al., 2004); and Supply
Chain Reliability via Delivery Schedule Adherence, which measures consistency and customer satisfaction
(Whitten et al., 2012; Ning & Yao, 2023). DT technologies like automation and real-time tracking (Zhou, 2024;
Nguyen et al., 2025) are expected to enhance all three measures.
Digital Transformation
Digital transformation fundamentally re-engineers logistics processes for ports. Digital transformation (DT) is
defined as the strategic incorporation of digital technologies into all aspects of the supply chain from planning
to customer service to optimize performance and enhance flexibility (Nguyen et al., 2025). Furthermore, it is
described as the integration of technologies like IoT, AI, and blockchain into supply chains to foster agility,
enabling real-time monitoring and data analysis (Miller, 2024). DT is also an evolutionary process relying on
digital technology to change business processes and create value (Iman et al., 2022).
DT is the adoption of computational technologies like Port Community Systems (PCS) and Maritime Single
Windows (MSW) to enhance operational efficiency (Bin Aifan et al., 2025). Digital transformation represents a
foundational shift, not just adopting new tools, but utilizing technologies like IoT, big data, and cloud platforms
to transcend temporal and spatial constraints, significantly enhancing information retrieval and acquisition
capabilities of enterprises (Xiong et al., 2025). The significance of DT lies in its ability to directly improve
operational visibility, shorten cargo dwell times, and facilitate coordination among port stakeholders (Nguyen
& Pham, 2025). For the Apapa Port supply chain, DT's importance is manifested in its potential to augment
cargo throughput and enhance berth productivity through resource optimization (Li et al., 2025), enabling firms
to achieve high-frequency interaction and collaborative throughput improvement (Zhou, 2024). This integration
boosts supply chain responsiveness and resilience by fostering better coordination and faster decision-making
(Nguyen et al., 2025; Fu et al., 2025).
Port Community Systems Implementation
Port Community Systems Implementation is essential for enhancing efficiency and coordination in port
operations. According to Dameri et al. (2019), Port Community System is an electronic platform that facilitates
the secure, intelligent exchange of information among public and private stakeholders in a port, integrating
systems to streamline documentation. Mubder (2025) defined a PCS as a neutral, integrated digital platform that
facilitates secure information exchange among port stakeholders, including shipping lines, terminals, and
customs, to streamline administrative and operational processes. World Bank (2023) noted that PCS are digital
collaborative platforms enabling seamless information exchange, reducing paperwork and administrative delays
for enhanced competitiveness.
This system is explained by Li et al. (2025) who classify PCS as a digital platform integrating multi-stakeholder
data for seamless port operations. PCS Implementation involves establishing a shared digital space where all
port entities can submit and access real-time data, thus breaking down traditional information silos (Li et al.,
2025). The importance of this concept for the Apapa Port supply chain is its proven ability to optimize
information flows, cut cargo clearance times by up to 30% (Heilig et al., 2017), and reduce communication errors
(Caldeirinha et al., 2020). By centralizing data, PCS adoption supports data-driven port management, which
slashes administrative time and directly enhances Port Throughput and Berth Productivity by promoting
optimized resource allocation, ensuring better supply chain reliability, and fostering improved schedule
adherence (Mubder, 2025; Li et al., 2025).
Automation of Cargo Handling
Automation of cargo handling revolutionizes port operations by minimizing human involvement in container
movement. Automation of Cargo Handling (AOCH) systems are defined by Mwaya and Mwisila (2025) as
integrated twin-lift ship-to-shore cranes, automated guided vehicles (AGVs), and computer-controlled yard
Page 1117
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
cranes that standardize and accelerate container movements. Okere (2022) similarly described AOCH as the
deployment of mechanized and computerized systems, such as rubber-tired gantry cranes and straddle carriers,
to minimize manual intervention.vid (2019) focused on the integration of driverless technologies, like AGVs
and automated stacking cranes (ASCs), to transport and transfer containers without direct human involvement,
thereby streamlining operations.
Furthermore, Jobran and Kara (2022) defined AOCH by its goal to execute container movement and storage
without human intervention. By blending these definitions, AOCH is understood as the strategic application of
advanced, digitally-controlled equipment to mechanize the entire goods flow within a port, from the quay to the
terminal exit (Li et al., 2025). The significance of AOCH to the Apapa Port supply chain is its proven ability to
enhance efficiency dramatically. Empirical evidence shows that automation significantly reduces ship
turnaround time (Jobran & Kara, 2022) and shortens vessel-quay time (Mwaya & Mwisila, 2025), directly
boosting Port Throughput and Berth Productivity. Locally, specific equipment automation is shown to
significantly reduce the Average Dwell Time of Cargo (Okpara, 2022). This minimized manual handling also
reduces errors and improves safety (Jobran & Kara, 2022), leading to more consistent operations and,
consequently, better Supply Chain Reliability via Delivery Schedule Adherence.
Digital Customs Clearance System
A digital customs clearance system drastically speeds up the movement of goods through ports. Suzuki (2025)
defined digital customs clearance system as an electronic platform automating trade procedures to reduce costs
and delays. Otakulova (2023) further described DCCS as the automation of border procedures using technologies
like Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) to facilitate electronic submissions and risk assessments, minimizing
manual interventions. Salau (2020) defined the system as an integrated, technology-driven platform that
automates the entire customs process, from cargo declaration to release, minimizing paperwork and human
intervention. Hamisi (2024) added that such systems streamline workflows and reduce bottlenecks, enhancing
operational efficiency.
Digital customs clearance system represents a strategic digital integration that shifts customs operations from
manual, paper-based, and sequential processes to seamless, centralized electronic workflows (Lusweti, 2020).
The significance of DCCS for the Apapa Port supply chain is profound because clearance time directly affects
the Average Dwell Time of Cargo. Automation via e-Clearance and risk profiling enables faster cargo release,
with systems like Nigeria’s e-Customs deploying Non-Intrusive Inspection (NII) equipment to minimize
physical inspection requirements (Salau, 2020). This not only reduces cargo release time significantly (Hamisi,
2024) but also enhances transparency and reduces opportunities for fraud, contributing to the ports Supply Chain
Reliability and operational efficiency (Adeniyi, 2025).
Use of IoT for Tracking and Monitoring
The Internet of Things (IoT) transforms supply chains by connecting physical assets, providing real-time data
for better decision-making. As defined by Ayemenre (2024), IoT in logistics involves interconnected devices
embedded with sensors and connectivity, enabling the collection and exchange of data for continuous monitoring
and optimization. Cserhat (2023) explained that IoT in smart ports as a network of interconnected devices that
enable real-time data capture, optimizing operations and enhancing supply chain visibility. Kärst (2023) focused
on IoT as devices and sensors that collect, transmit, and analyze real-time data from physical assets, enabling
visibility into asset locations and environmental conditions, especially in infrastructure-challenged regions.
Ben-Daya et al. (2019) noted that IoT involves sensors and RFID tags that capture real-time data on location,
condition, and movement. Synthesizing these definitions, IoT for tracking and monitoring represents the
deployment of networked sensors and smart devices (like GPS and RFID) to generate continuous, actionable
data on cargo and equipment (Ikeavuje et al., 2024). For the Apapa Port supply chain, the significance of IoT is
immense as it directly addresses issues related to Average Dwell Time of Cargo and Supply Chain Reliability.
Real-time tracking of containers and port assets minimizes the risk of theft and diversion (Olota et al., 2023),
while continuous monitoring of equipment allows for predictive maintenance, reducing unplanned downtime
Page 1118
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
that impairs Port Throughput and Berth Productivity (Koritarov & Dimitrakiev, 2024). This enhanced visibility
and predictive capability ensure timely deliveries and improve overall operational responsiveness (Ayemenre,
2024; Miller, 2024).
Empirical Review
Port Community Systems Implementation and Performance
Mthembu and Chasomeris (2022) explored a systems approach to developing a port community system for south
africa. The study aimed to understand the fragmented information flow in South African ports and develop a
PCS implementation framework, with PCS implementation as the key independent variable and port supply
chain efficiency (proxies: reduced duplication, delays, and errors) as the dependent variable. It employed
qualitative soft systems methodology, involving 24 semi-structured interviews and two stakeholder workshops
with port users including Transnet National Ports Authority officials, terminal operators, ship agents, freight
forwarders, and customs representatives; data were collected via interviews and workshops, analyzed
thematically using rich pictures, CATWOE analysis, root definitions, and conceptual models. Findings revealed
siloed operations, lack of integration, and stakeholder support for PCS, leading to a three-level modular
framework prioritizing core users (e.g., port authority, terminals) in level one for bookings and declarations.
Recommendations included government-led cross-functional teams, stakeholder buy-in, and phased rollout. The
strength lay in its participatory SSM approach ensuring cultural feasibility. However, it lacked quantitative cost-
benefit analysis and focused solely on South Africa, limiting generalizability to other African ports like Apapa.
Tijan et al. (2021) explored the role of port authority in port governance and port community system
implementation. The study examined port authorities' roles in governance models and PCS adoption as variables
for sustainability, using literature review methodology with 73 sources from Web of Science and additional
references, focusing on global seaports without specified population or sample size, employing manual screening
for data collection and qualitative analysis. Findings revealed port authorities as key initiators in PCS
implementation, evolving into digital hubs for optimized processes and sustainability across models like landlord
ports; recommendations included analyzing PCS financing models. The strength lay in comprehensive case
integration, such as Rotterdam and Tuscan PCS. However, reliance on literature review limited empirical
validation and generalizability to specific contexts like Nigerian ports.
Caldeirinha et al. (2020) examined port community systems and their implications on port performance. The
study analyzed characteristics of port community systems including service level, partner network, ship services,
cargo and port services, logistics services, and advanced services, with port performance measured through
operational performance, effectiveness, and efficiency; digital customs clearance was embedded in cargo and
port services and partner network constructs. Methodology employed structural equation modeling on survey
data from 153 managers across Portuguese ports, collected via 7-point Likert-scale questionnaires. Findings
revealed advanced services, partner network, and ship services significantly influenced efficiency and
effectiveness, while Portuguese ports lagged in logistics and advanced features compared to northern European
counterparts. Recommendations urged development of advanced PCS services and broader partner networks.
Strength lay in robust SEM validation and multi-construct reliability (Cronbach’s α > 0.8). However, limitations
included small sample size, Portuguese focus, and dominance by port authorities, restricting generalizability.
Automation of Cargo Handling and Performance
Mwaya and Mwisila (2025) assessed the impact of automated cargo handling systems on operational efficiency
at dar es salaam port, tanzania. The study examined automated cargo handling (twin-lift cranes, AGVs, yard-
stacking cranes) as the independent variable and port efficiency (vessel turnaround time, berth productivity,
container dwell time) as the dependent variable. A convergent mixed-methods design integrated 96 structured
questionnaires (Cronbach’s α = .842) and port metrics with 20 semi-structured interviews and three-day quay-
side observations; the population comprised Dar es Salaam Port stakeholders, with a stratified sample of 96
respondents; data were collected via questionnaires, interviews, observations, and the Tanzania Ports Authority
MIS; analysis used SPSS for descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation (r = .642, p < .001), and multiple
Page 1119
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
regression (β = .278, p < .001), plus NVivo thematic analysis. Findings revealed a 41% reduction in vessel-quay
time (12.6 h to 7.4 h) and ACH uniquely explained 27.8% of efficiency variance; recommendations emphasized
resilient power backups and maintenance training. The strength lay in triangulated mixed-methods rigor.
However, the single-port cross-sectional design limited generalizability and overlooked longitudinal maturation
effects.
Okpara (2022) examined effect of cargo handling equipment on performance of Onne and Calabar ports in
Nigeria. The study determined the extent to which tractor-trailer system, forklift system, reach stacker system,
and crane system affected cargo dwell time. A cross-sectional survey design was adopted with a population of
593 staff from Onne (277) and Calabar (316) ports; Taro Yamane formula yielded a sample of 239, with 210
valid responses (86% rate). Data were collected via structured questionnaire on a 4-point Likert scale and
analyzed using multiple regression in SPSS 25.0. Findings showed all four equipment types had positive
significant effects on cargo dwell time = .331, .642, .195, .164; p < .001), with = .845 indicating 84.5%
variance explained. Recommendations included modernization of equipment and establishment of enhancement
systems to boost performance. The strength lay in its focused regression modeling of specific equipment on
dwell time. However, the small two-port sample limited generalizability to Nigeria’s six ports, and self-reported
data risked bias.
Digital Customs Clearance System and Performance
Hamisi (2024) assessed the effect of automated customs clearance systems on enhancing trade efficiency in
Tanzania. The study examined operational efficiency, cost reduction, stakeholder satisfaction, clearance times,
and labor cost savings as proxies for trade efficiency, using an explanatory design with qualitative methods. Data
were collected from 52 purposive-sampled stakeholders at Dar es Salaam port via questionnaires, interviews,
and documentary reviews, and analyzed with SPSS descriptive statistics, ANOVA, t-tests, and regression.
Findings revealed 90.4% agreement on improved operational efficiency, 84.6% on cost reduction and
stakeholder satisfaction, and 88.4% on reduced clearance times, with all variables significantly predicting trade
efficiency (p < .001). Recommendations included investing in infrastructure, training, and stakeholder
engagement. The strength lay in mixed-method triangulation and statistical rigor. However, the small sample
limited generalizability, and qualitative depth was constrained by reliance on SPSS for primarily quantitative
interpretation.
Bassa et al. (2021) assessed the impact of paperless information technology-based custom clearance at Ghana
ports on businesses and industrial supply chains. The study examined paperless IT-based port clearance
(independent variable; proxies: regulations guiding electronic transactions, certification authority, cross-border
electronic data interchange, electronic interchange of certificate of origin, electronic exchange of sanitary and
phyto-sanitary certificates, electronic issuance of letters of credit by bankers) and transaction cost reduction,
customer order fulfillment, and supply chain relationships (dependent variables). The study employed a
quantitative survey method, targeting top managers of import/export firms in Ghana as the population, with a
sample size of 139 from 200 distributed questionnaires collected via paper-based instruments and analyzed using
descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and stepwise regression. The study determined strong positive
correlations (r = 0.734 for customer order fulfillment, r = 0.617 for transaction cost reduction, r = 0.625 for
supply chain relationships, all p < 0.05) and significant predictive effects (R² = 0.539, 0.381, 0.390 respectively),
confirming hypotheses of positive influences, particularly strongest on customer order fulfillment. The study
recommended full integration of paperless practices by port authorities, stakeholder collaboration to enhance
adoption, and policy interventions to promote digital clearance for improved efficiency. The strength of this
study lay in its context-specific application of transaction cost economics theory to sub-Saharan African ports
and high-reliability measures (Cronbach’s α > 0.87). However, the critique noted limited generalizability due to
purposive sampling and self-reported data, alongside minimal current adoption levels potentially
underestimating long-term impacts.
Page 1120
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
Use of IoT for Tracking and Monitoring and Performance
Ezekwueme et al. (2024) examined efficiency of IoT adoption and supply chain optimization: empirical evidence
from Nigeria. The study assessed the impact of IoT adoption on supply chain efficiency metrics including lead
time, inventory turnover, and order accuracy, with IoT applications such as real-time tracking and monitoring as
independent variables. It employed a quantitative methodology with purposive sampling, targeting 50 senior
managers from five Nigerian companies across transportation, agriculture, healthcare, food supply, and online
retail sectors; data were collected via online structured questionnaires, yielding 43 responses, and analyzed using
IBM SPSS version 27 through descriptive statistics, regression, and correlation tests. Findings revealed 74.4%
IoT adoption rate, with real-time tracking implemented by 54.3% of companies, leading to moderate
improvements in lead time (negative correlation of -0.345, p=0.053) and significant gains in order accuracy
(39.5% rated significantly enhanced); 60% reported enhanced inventory management via automated systems
and sensors. Recommendations included bolstering digital infrastructure, regulatory frameworks, pilot projects,
local expertise training, and public-private partnerships. The strength lies in its multi-sectoral empirical evidence
from Nigeria, filling a contextual gap. However, purposive sampling and self-reported data may introduce bias,
limiting generalizability, while the small sample size weakened statistical significance.
Olota et al. (2023) examined internet of things and supply chain management: an empirical analysis of nigeria
perspective. The study assessed IoT factors (including tracking and monitoring via real-time data sensors) and
their effect on SCM performance, focusing on efficiency and visibility. It adopted survey research design with
Jumia Nigeria employees as population; 265 were sampled randomly, yielding 253 valid responses via
questionnaires. Data were analyzed using SmartPLS3 structural equation modeling at 0.05 significance. Findings
revealed IoT exerted a strong positive effect = 0.948, p = 0.000) on SCM, explaining 89.9% variance (=
0.899). It recommended IoT integration for continuous SCM enhancement. The strength lies in robust PLS-SEM
validation of high predictive power. However, its single-firm focus limits generalizability to port logistics
contexts like Apapa.
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
The underpinning theory for this study is the Dynamic Capabilities Theory (DCT), propounded and developed
primarily by Teece, Pisano, and Shuen (1997), building on the resource-based view (RBV) of the firm. DCT
suggests that a firms competitive advantage, particularly in rapidly changing environments like the digital
transformation of a port supply chain, is derived from its unique ability to integrate, build, and reconfigure
internal and external competences to address rapidly changing environments (Teece et al., 1997). The theory
emphasizes a firm's capacity to sense opportunities and threats, seize those opportunities, and reconfigure its
resources, often through the strategic adoption of technology, which aligns perfectly with the various dimensions
of Digital Transformation (DT) explored in this study (Teece, 2018). Specifically, DCT provides a lens to
understand how the proactive adoption of DT elements such as Port Community Systems Implementation,
Automation of Cargo Handling, Digital Customs Clearance System, and the Use of IoT for Tracking and
Monitoring constitutes a crucial dynamic capability for the Apapa Port supply chain to achieve superior Supply
Chain Performance outcomes like reduced Average Dwell Time of Cargo and enhanced Port Throughput and
Berth Productivity (Miller, 2024; Nguyen et al., 2025).
A key strength of the Dynamic Capabilities Theory is that it moves beyond the static view of resources in the
traditional RBV, emphasizing the process of change and innovation, which is particularly relevant to the
evolutionary nature of DT (Iman et al., 2022). For instance, the theory explains how the continuous investment
in IoT for real-time tracking does not just create a new resource but develops a capability to sense delays and
inefficiencies and seize the opportunity for better delivery schedule adherence (Ayemenre, 2024). However, the
theory is often critiqued for its lack of precise operationalization and tautological nature, where defining a
dynamic capability separately from the performance it explains can be challenging (Easterby-Smith & Prieto,
2008).
Furthermore, Teece (2018) cautioned that simply having the technology is insufficient; the port must also possess
the managerial and organizational routines to effectively utilize the data and systems, which underscores the
Page 1121
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
importance of stakeholder buy-in and organizational change management in PCS Implementation (Mubder,
2025). Despite these criticisms, DCT effectively frames the Digital Transformation initiatives as the means by
which the Apapa Port supply chain senses, seizes, and reconfigures its operational processes to enhance
efficiency, responsiveness, and reliability, thereby sustaining its competitive position, making it the most suitable
theoretical underpinning.
METHODOLOGY
This study employed a cross-sectional survey research design to investigate the effect of digital transformation
on the performance of the supply chain at Apapa Port, Lagos State. The cross-sectional design is appropriate for
capturing data at a single point in time from diverse port stakeholders, enabling assessment of relationships
between digital transformation practices and supply chain performance indicators. The target population
comprises all operational, customs, logistics, and IT professionals at Apapa Port directly involved in digital
systems and supply chain processes, totaling 202 staff members (see appendices III).
A purposive sampling technique was employed to select 153 respondents who possessed specialized expertise
in Port Community Systems Implementation, Automation of Cargo Handling, Digital Customs Clearance
System, Use of IoT for Tracking and Monitoring, and supply chain performance metrics. This non-probability
sampling method ensured the inclusion of knowledgeable individuals capable of providing contextually rich and
statistically meaningful insights, while maintaining adequate power for the planned analyses. Data collection
was conducted through a structured 5-point Likert-scale questionnaire (1 = Strongly Disagree, 5 = Strongly
Agree) administered via Google Forms. The instrument was carefully adapted from previously validated scales:
Port Community Systems Implementation items drew from Dameri et al. (2019), Tijan et al. (2021), and Barbu
et al. (2020); Automation of Cargo Handling from Jobran and Kara (2022), Okpara (2022), and Dávid (2019);
Digital Customs Clearance System from Otakulova (2023) and Bassa et al. (2021); Use of IoT for Tracking and
Monitoring from Olota et al. (2023), Karim et al. (2024), and Miller (2024); and Supply Chain Performance
from Putri et al. (2019), Zhang and Okoroafo (2015), Ning and Yao (2023), and Gunasekaran et al. (2004).
The choice of Google Forms as the data collection platform was driven by its accessibility, cost-effectiveness,
real-time data capture capabilities, and ease of distribution across geographically dispersed respondents within
Apapa Port. The platform supported secure, encrypted transmission of responses, ensured anonymity through
system-generated unique IDs, enabled automatic data validation to reduce entry errors, and allowed seamless
export to CSV and SmartPLS formats, thereby streamlining the analytical workflow and enhancing response
rates in a digitally literate professional setting. Informed consent was embedded directly on the questionnaire’s
landing page, clearly stating that participation was voluntary and that respondents could withdraw at any stage
without consequence. Ethical consideration was adhered to and all responses were anonymized to protect
participant confidentiality.
The reliability of the constructs in this study was established using Cronbach’s Alpha, with values well above
the 0.70 threshold recommended by Hair et al. (2014). Specifically, the results demonstrated strong internal
consistency: Port Community Systems Implementation (0.866), Automation of Cargo Handling (0.834), Digital
Customs Clearance System (0.888), Use of IoT for Tracking and Monitoring (0.875), and Supply Chain
Performance (0.855). These Cronbach’s Alpha values confirmed that the questionnaire items consistently
measured their intended constructs, ensuring the credibility and robustness of the findings.
Data analysis was performed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in SmartPLS
3, chosen for its robustness in handling complex predictive models, smaller sample sizes, and non-normal data
distributions commonly encountered in organizational research. The analysis adhered to the standard two-step
procedure: first, assessment of the measurement model (indicator reliability, convergent validity via AVE, and
discriminant validity via HTMT); second, evaluation of the structural model (path coefficients, coefficient of
determination R², effect size f², predictive relevance Q², and overall model fit using SRMR and NFI). Statistical
significance was determined through bootstrapping with 5,000 subsamples, ensuring reliable inference of direct
and indirect effects.
Page 1122
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
Figure 1: Model Specification
Source: SMART, PLS Output, 2025.
Data Presentation and Analysis
A total of 153 valid responses were obtained from a purposive sample of 202 professionals at Apapa Port,
yielding a 75.7% response rate. This high rate reflects strong stakeholder engagement in digital transformation.
Data were analyzed using PLS-SEM in SmartPLS 3 (Hair et al., 2022). First, the measurement model confirmed
reliability and validity of constructs: Port Community Systems Implementation (PCSI), Automation of Cargo
Handling (AOCH), Digital Customs Clearance System (DCCS), Use of IoT for Tracking and Monitoring
(IOTM), and Supply Chain Performance (PFSC). Second, the structural model tested their effects on supply
chain performance, measured via cargo dwell time, port throughput, berth productivity, and delivery adherence.
Below is the demographic profile of the respondents.
Table 1: Demographic Profile of Respondents (N = 153)
Variable
Category
Frequency (f)
Percentage (%)
Sex of the Respondent
Male
74
48.4
Female
79
51.6
Total
153
100.0
Age
1830 years
37
24.2
3140 years
53
34.6
4150 years
45
29.4
51 years and above
18
11.8
Total
153
100.0
Educational Background
B.Sc./HND
35
22.9
Master’s
89
58.2
PhD
29
19.0
Total
153
100.0
Page 1123
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
Years of Service
15 years
27
17.6
610 years
56
36.6
More than 10 years
70
45.8
Total
153
100.0
Department/Unit
Operations
32
20.9
Customs
18
11.8
Logistics
56
36.6
IT/Technology
47
30.7
Total
153
100.0
Source: Authors Compilation, 2025.
Table 4.1 presents the demographic profile of the 153 respondents involved in the study on the effect of digital
transformation on supply chain performance at Apapa Port, Lagos State. The gender distribution is nearly
balanced, with females slightly predominant (48.4%) over males (51.6%), indicating inclusive representation
across sexes. Age-wise, the majority fall within the productive working brackets of 3140 years (34.6%) and
4150 years (29.4%), suggesting a mature and experienced respondent base, while only 11.8% are above 51
years. Educationally, a significant proportion hold advanced degrees 58.2% with Master’s and 19.0% with PhD
reflecting a highly qualified sample capable of providing informed insights into digital transformation processes.
In terms of tenure, 45.8% have more than 10 years of service, and 36.6% between 610 years, implying deep
institutional knowledge and familiarity with port operations. Departmentally, Logistics (36.6%) and
IT/Technology (30.7%) dominate, aligning well with the study’s focus on digital tools and supply chain
efficiency, followed by Operations (20.9%) and Customs (11.8%).
This demographic composition enhances the credibility and reliability of the findings. The high educational
attainment and long tenure ensure respondents possess technical expertise and contextual understanding of
Apapa Port’s challenges and digital initiatives. The strong presence of Logistics and IT personnel validates
responses on technology adoption (e.g., IoT, PCS, automation), while balanced gender and age distribution
minimizes bias. The sample is well-suited to evaluate the practical impacts of digital transformation on dwell
time, throughput, and reliability, supporting robust policy and operational recommendations.
Table 2: Descriptive Statistics
Construct
Mean
Min
Max
Std. Dev.
Excess
Kurtosis
Skewness
Port Community Systems Implementation
(PCSI1-5)
3.840
1.0
5.0
1.216
0.267
0.845
Automation of Cargo Handling (AOCH1-
5)
3.943
1.0
5.0
1.123
0.290
1.003
Digital Customs Clearance System
(DCCS1-5)
3.897
1.0
5.0
1.250
0.016
0.986
Use of IoT for Tracking and Monitoring
(IOTM1-5)
3.975
1.0
5.0
1.197
0.123
1.043
Supply Chain Performance (PFSC1-5)
3.987
1.0
5.0
1.151
0.462
1.087
Source: SMART PLS Output, 2025.
Table 2 presents descriptive statistics for constructs from 153 respondents. Port Community Systems
Implementation (PCSI): mean 3.840, SD 1.216; Automation of Cargo Handling (AOCH): mean 3.943, SD 1.123;
Digital Customs Clearance System (DCCS): mean 3.897, SD 1.250; Use of IoT for Tracking and Monitoring
(IOTM): mean 3.975, SD 1.197; Supply Chain Performance (PFSC): mean 3.987, SD 1.151. All medians are
4.000; range 1.05.0. Skewness ranges from 0.845 (PCSI) to 1.087 (PFSC), indicating moderate left-skew
with mostly positive ratings. Excess kurtosis (0.267 to 0.462) suggests near-normal distribution. High means
(>3.8) and low variability (SD 1.11.25) reflect strong consensus on the effectiveness of digital tools in
Page 1124
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
reducing cargo dwell time, enhancing port throughput, and improving delivery reliability at Apapa Port. (120
words)
Assessment of Measurement Model
Source: SmartPLS Output, 2025.
Figure 2: Indicator Loadings
Table 3: Reliability of Study Scale
S/N
Variables
Factor Loadings
Cronbach’s
Alpha
Composite
Reliability
AVE
1
Port Community
Systems
Implementation
(PCSI)
PCSI2 (0.808),
PCSI3 (0.859),
PCSI4 (0.900),
PCSI5 (0.805)
0.866
0.908
0.712
0.015
2
Automation of Cargo
Handling (AOCH)
AOCH2 (0.739),
AOCH3 (0.810),
AOCH4 (0.878),
AOCH5 (0.818)
0.834
0.886
0.661
0.003
3
Digital Customs
Clearance System
(DCCS)
DCCS1 (0.801),
DCCS2 (0.820),
DCCS3 (0.889),
DCCS4 (0.861),
DCCS5 (0.782)
0.888
0.918
0.691
0.036
Page 1125
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
4
Use of IoT for
Tracking and
Monitoring (IOTM)
IOTM1 (0.762),
IOTM2 (0.813),
IOTM3 (0.847),
IOTM4 (0.856),
IOTM5 (0.802)
0.875
0.909
0.667
0.159
5
Supply Chain
Performance (PFSC)
PFSC1 (0.708),
PFSC2 (0.766),
PFSC3 (0.898),
PFSC4 (0.831),
PFSC5 (0.773)
0.855
0.897
0.636
0.685
Source: SmartPLS Output, 2025.
Table 3 presents reliability results for the study constructs. Factor loadings mostly exceed 0.70, confirming
strong indicator representation (Hair et al., 2019). Cronbach’s Alpha values range from 0.834 (AOCH) to 0.888
(DCCS), indicating high internal consistency (Nunnally, 1978). Composite Reliability values, from 0.886
(AOCH) to 0.918 (DCCS), exceed 0.70, supporting reliability (Fornell & Larcker, 1981). AVE values, ranging
from 0.636 (PFSC) to 0.712 (PCSI), surpass 0.50, confirming convergent validity.
The effect sizes (f²) indicate the contribution of each predictor to Supply Chain Performance: Use of IoT for
Tracking and Monitoring (IOTM) has a large effect (f² = 0.159), Digital Customs Clearance System (DCCS) a
small effect (f² = 0.036), Port Community Systems Implementation (PCSI) a small effect (f² = 0.015), and
Automation of Cargo Handling (AOCH) a small effect (f² = 0.003) (Cohen, 1988). The for Supply Chain
Performance is 0.685, with an adjusted of 0.669, indicating 68.5% of variance is explained by predictors,
demonstrating substantial predictive accuracy (Hair et al., 2019). The measurement model is reliable and valid
for structural analysis.
Table 4: Heterotrait-Monotrait Ratio (HTMT)
Variables
(PCSI)
(AOCH)
(DCCS)
(PFSC)
(IOTM)
Port Community Systems Implementation
Automation of Cargo Handling
0.637
Digital Customs Clearance System
0.420
0.585
Supply Chain Performance
0.443
0.437
0.542
Use of IoT for Tracking and Monitoring
0.506
0.499
0.619
0.656
Source: SmartPLS Output, 2025.
Table 4 presents the Heterotrait-Monotrait Ratio (HTMT) values for the constructs Port Community Systems
Implementation (PCSI), Automation of Cargo Handling (AOCH), Digital Customs Clearance System (DCCS),
Supply Chain Performance (PFSC), and Use of IoT for Tracking and Monitoring (IOTM). The HTMT assesses
discriminant validity, with values below 0.90 indicating distinct constructs (Henseler et al., 2015).
HTMT values range from 0.420 (PCSI and DCCS) to 0.656 (PFSC and IOTM), all below 0.90. These results
confirm that the constructs are sufficiently distinct, exhibiting strong discriminant validity with no excessive
shared variance. Thus, the measurement model is valid in terms of both convergent and discriminant validity,
aligning with Henseler et al. (2015) guidelines.
Collinearity Statistics
Table 5: Inner VIF
Variables
Supply Chain Performance (PFSC)
Port Community Systems Implementation (PCSI)
1.548
Automation of Cargo Handling (AOCH)
1.739
Page 1126
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
Digital Customs Clearance System (DCCS)
1.644
Use of IoT for Tracking and Monitoring (IOTM)
1.590
Source: SmartPLS Output, 2025.
Table 5 presents the inner Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) values for the predictor constructs influencing Supply
Chain Performance (PFSC). All inner VIF values range from 1.548 (PCSI) to 1.739 (AOCH), well below the
conservative threshold of 3.0 and the commonly accepted limit of 5.0 (Hair et al., 2019).
These results indicate no significant collinearity among the independent variables, Port Community Systems
Implementation (PCSI), Automation of Cargo Handling (AOCH), Digital Customs Clearance System (DCCS),
and Use of IoT for Tracking and Monitoring (IOTM). Therefore, the structural model is free from
multicollinearity issues, ensuring reliable path coefficient estimates and supporting the robustness of the
regression analysis.
Model Goodness of Fit (GOF)
Table 6: Model Fit
Fit Indices
Saturated Model
Estimated Model
SRMR
0.067
0.067
d_ULS
1.237
1.237
d_G
0.647
0.647
Chi-Square
542.958
542.958
NFI
0.764
0.764
Source: Smart PLS Output, 2025.
Table 6 presents the goodness-of-fit indices for both the saturated and estimated models. The Standardized Root
Mean Square Residual (SRMR) is 0.067 for both models, below the threshold of 0.08, indicating acceptable
model fit (Hu & Bentler, 1999).
The geodesic discrepancy (d_G) is 0.647, and the unweighted least squares discrepancy (d_ULS) is 1.237, both
confirming good fit when evaluated against bootstrapped confidence intervals in PLS-SEM. The Normed Fit
Index (NFI) of 0.764 is close to 0.80, suggesting reasonable incremental fit.
Overall, the model demonstrates acceptable to good fit, supporting the plausibility of the proposed relationships
in the structural model assessing the effect of digital transformation on supply chain performance at Apapa Port
(Henseler et al., 2016).
Assessing the Structural Model
Having satisfied the measurement model assessment, the next step in evaluating PLS-SEM results is to assess
the structural model. Standard assessment criteria, which was considered include the path coefficient, t-values,
p-values and coefficient of determination (R
2
). The bootstrapping procedure was conducted using a resample of
5000.
Page 1127
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
Figure 3: Path Coefficients of the Regression Model.
Source: SMART PLS Output, 2025.
Table 7: Path Coefficients
Variables
Original
Sample
(O)
Sample
Mean
(M)
Standard
Deviation
(STDEV)
T Statistics
(|O/STDEV|)
P
Values
Decision
Port Community Systems
Implementation
0.118
0.126
0.090
1.314
0.190
Accepted
Automation of Cargo
Handling
0.055
0.064
0.097
0.565
0.573
Accepted
Digital Customs Clearance
System
0.191
0.194
0.092
2.086
0.038
Rejected
Use of IoT for Tracking and
Monitoring
0.394
0.388
0.101
3.881
0.000
Rejected
Source: SmartPLS Output, 2025
Key Findings
Statistically Significant Relationships (p < 0.05):
i. IoT for Tracking and Monitoring shows the strongest effect (β = 0.394, p = 0.000)
ii. Digital Customs Clearance System demonstrates a moderate significant effect (β = 0.191, p = 0.038)
Non-Significant Relationships (p > 0.05):
iii. Port Community Systems Implementation (β = 0.118, p = 0.190)
iv. Automation of Cargo Handling (β = 0.055, p = 0.573)
Page 1128
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
Table 7 presents the path coefficients, T-statistics, and p-values for the relationships between the independent
variables (Port Community Systems Implementation, Automation of Cargo Handling, Digital Customs
Clearance System, Use of IoT for Tracking and Monitoring) and the dependent variable (Supply Chain
Performance, PFSC) at Apapa Port, Lagos State.
H₀₁: Port Community Systems Implementation has no significant effect on the performance of the supply
chain at Apapa Port, Lagos State.
The analysis of the relationship between Port Community Systems Implementation (PCSI) and Supply Chain
Performance (PFSC) yielded a path coefficient of 0.118, indicating a weak positive effect. The sample mean
(0.126) and standard deviation (0.090) suggest consistency in the data. With a T-statistic of 1.314, below the
critical threshold of 1.96, and a p-value of 0.190 (above 0.05), the relationship is not statistically significant,
leading to the acceptance of H₀₁ (Hair et al., 2019). This result implies that Port Community Systems
Implementation does not significantly influence Supply Chain Performance at Apapa Port, possibly due to
fragmented stakeholder integration or low digital maturity hindering seamless information exchange. Effective
PCS requires collaborative frameworks and phased adoption, but infrastructural barriers or resistance from port
actors may limit its impact (Mthembu & Chasomeris, 2022). This finding aligns with Caldeirinha et al. (2020),
who noted that PCS effectiveness depends on advanced services and partner networks, which may be
underdeveloped at Apapa Port.
H₀₂: Automation of Cargo Handling has no significant effect on the performance of the supply chain at
Apapa Port, Lagos State.
The relationship between Automation of Cargo Handling (AOCH) and PFSC shows a path coefficient of 0.055,
indicating a negligible positive effect. The sample mean (0.064) and standard deviation (0.097) suggest
variability. The T-statistic of 0.565, below 1.96, and a p-value of 0.573 (above 0.05) confirm no statistical
significance, leading to the acceptance of H₀₂ (Hair et al., 2019). This result suggests that Automation of Cargo
Handling does not significantly influence Supply Chain Performance, likely due to inadequate equipment
maintenance, power instability, or limited automation scale at Apapa Port. While automated systems like AGVs
and cranes can reduce dwell times, operational challenges may dilute benefits (Mwaya & Mwisila, 2025). This
is consistent with Okpara (2022), who highlighted that cargo handling equipment impacts dwell time only with
modernization and reliable support systems.
H₀₃: Digital Customs Clearance System has no significant effect on the performance of the supply chain
at Apapa Port, Lagos State.
The path coefficient for Digital Customs Clearance System (DCCS) and PFSC is 0.191, indicating a moderate
positive effect. The sample mean (0.194) and standard deviation (0.092) suggest data consistency. The T-statistic
of 2.086 exceeds the critical threshold of 1.96, and the p-value of 0.038 (below 0.05) confirms statistical
significance, leading to the rejection of H₀₃ (Hair et al., 2019). This finding suggests that Digital Customs
Clearance System significantly enhances Supply Chain Performance by reducing clearance times, minimizing
errors, and improving throughput and reliability. Electronic single-window platforms streamline documentation
and risk-based inspections, fostering efficiency and customer satisfaction (Hamisi, 2024). By accelerating
customs processes, DCCS supports berth productivity and delivery adherence at Apapa Port, aligning with Bassa
et al. (2021), who emphasized paperless clearance’s role in transaction cost reduction and order fulfillment in
African ports.
H₀₄: Use of IoT for Tracking and Monitoring has no significant effect on the performance of the supply
chain at Apapa Port, Lagos State.
The relationship between Use of IoT for Tracking and Monitoring (IOTM) and PFSC shows a path coefficient
of 0.394, indicating a strong positive effect. The sample mean (0.388) and standard deviation (0.101) suggest
consistency. The T-statistic of 3.881 exceeds 1.96, and the p-value of 0.000 confirms statistical significance,
leading to the rejection of H₀₄ (Hair et al., 2019). This finding suggests that Use of IoT for Tracking and
Monitoring significantly improves Supply Chain Performance through real-time visibility, reduced dwell times,
Page 1129
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
and enhanced reliability via sensor-based monitoring of cargo location, condition, and schedules. IoT enables
predictive analytics and proactive interventions, optimizing port throughput and berth utilization (Ezekwueme
et al., 2024). This aligns with Olota et al. (2023), who found IoT’s strong influence on supply chain efficiency
in Nigerian contexts through tracking and data-driven decisions.
CONCLUSION
This study examined the impact of Port Community Systems Implementation (PCSI), Automation of Cargo
Handling (AOCH), Digital Customs Clearance System (DCCS), and Use of IoT for Tracking and Monitoring
(IOTM) on Supply Chain Performance (PFSC) at Apapa Port, Lagos State. The findings are summarized as
follows:
1. Digital Customs Clearance System (DCCS) significantly enhances PFSC (β=0.191, p=0.038), reducing
clearance delays and improving throughput, berth productivity, and delivery reliability.
2. Use of IoT for Tracking and Monitoring (IOTM) has a strong significant effect on PFSC (β=0.394,
p=0.000), highlighting the critical role of real-time data in minimizing dwell times and enhancing
operational efficiency.
3. Port Community Systems Implementation (PCSI) showed no significant effect on PFSC (β=0.118,
p=0.190), likely due to integration gaps or stakeholder silos.
4. Automation of Cargo Handling (AOCH) had no significant impact on PFSC (β=0.055, p=0.573),
possibly due to infrastructural constraints or limited automation depth.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The following recommendations aim to address identified gaps and leverage effective practices to improve
average cargo dwell time, port throughput and berth productivity, and supply chain reliability at Apapa Port:
1. Apapa Port authorities should prioritize full rollout of Digital Customs Clearance Systems, integrating single-
window platforms with risk-based automation to accelerate processes and ensure seamless data flow.
2. Invest heavily in Use of IoT for Tracking and Monitoring, deploying sensors, RFID, and GPS across cargo
flows for real-time visibility, predictive maintenance, and end-to-end traceability.
3. Enhance Port Community Systems Implementation by fostering stakeholder collaboration, developing
modular PCS frameworks, and providing training to overcome silos and digital maturity barriers.
4. Improve Automation of Cargo Handling through acquisition of modern equipment (e.g., AGVs, automated
cranes), reliable power backups, and maintenance protocols to reduce handling times and boost productivity.
REFERENCES
1. Addo, A. (2020). Controlling petty corruption in public administrations of developing countries through
digitalization: An opportunity theory informed study of Ghana customs. The Information Society, 37(2),
99114. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2020.1870182
2. Adeniyi, B. (2025). Press briefing on the activities of Nigeria Customs Service for the first quarter of
2025. Federal Ministry of Information and National Orientation. https://fmino.gov.ng/press-briefing-
on-the-activities-of-nigeria-customs-service-for-the-first-quarter-of-2025-by-bashir-adewale-adeniyi-
comptroller-general-of-customs-on-april-22-2025-at-the-nigeria-customs-service-co/
3. AlMulhim, A. F. (2021). Smart supply chain and firm performance: The role of digital technologies.
Business Process Management Journal, 27(5), 13531372.
4. Anaba, D. C., Agho, M. O., Onukwulu, E. C., & Egbumokei, P. I. (2025). Advances in IoT-driven
supply chain analytics for agile and resilient offshore energy operations. International Research Journal
of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science, 7(1), 29082921.
https://doi.org/10.56726/IRJMETS66249
Page 1130
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
5. Aswin, B., & Saranya, P. C. (2025). Digital transformation of air customs clearance: A study on reducing
delays through technology. International Advanced Research Journal in Science, Engineering and
Technology, 12(5), 15851591. https://doi.org/10.17148/IARJSET.2025.125272
6. Ayemenre, S. (2024). Internet of Things in logistics. Ronish Logistics.
https://www.ronishlogistics.com/internet-of-things-in-logistics/
7. Barbu, A., Militaru, G., & Deselnicu, D. C. (2020). An overview of the port community system from
Romania. In Proceedings of the International Maritime and Logistics Conference Marlog 9” (pp. 1
12). Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport.
8. Bassa, L., Owusu Kwateng, K., & Kamewor, F. T. (2021). Paperless custom clearance and business
supply chains. Marine Economics and Management, 4(1), 4258. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAEM-03-
2020-0002
9. Beamon, B. M. (1999). Measuring supply chain performance. International Journal of Operations &
Production Management, 19(3), 275292.
10. Bin Aifan, N. A., AlBawab, M. A. S., & Morsi, A. M. (2025). The impact of implementing digital
transformation requirements on the performance of ports in accordance with sustainable development
requirements. Maritime Research and Technology, 4(2), 8088.
http://dx.doi.org/10.21622/MRT.2025.04.2.1346
11. Caldeirinha, V., Felício, J. A., Salvador, A. S., Nabais, J., & Pinho, T. (2020). Port community systems
and the interaction with port performance. Research in Transportation Economics, 80, 100818.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2020.100818
12. Carbone, V., & Martino, M. D. (2003). The changing role of ports in supply-chain management: An
empirical analysis. Maritime Policy and Management, 30(4), 305320.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0308883032000145618
13. Cil, A. Y., Abdurahman, D., & Cil, I. (2022). Internet of Things enabled real-time cold chain monitoring
in a container port. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 7(1), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-022-
00110-z
14. Cserhat, N. (2023, June 25). Internet of Things (IoT) in smart ports: Enhancing supply chain visibility
and efficiency. Medium. https://medium.com/@niko_81857/internet-of-things-iot-in-smart-ports-
enhancing-supply-chain-visibility-and-efficiency-b329a46ee3f6
15. Dameri, R. P., Rosenthal-Sabroux, C., & D’Amico, G. (2019). Port community systems: A structured
literature review. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 130, 340362.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2019.09.009
16. Duval, Y., & Mengjing, K. (2017). Digital trade facilitation: Paperless trade in regional trade agreements
(ADBI Working Paper Series No. 747). Asian Development Bank Institute.
17. Ezekwueme, A. E., Abel, C. E., & Dike, G. A. (2024). Efficiency of IoT adoption and supply chain
optimization: An empirical evidence from Nigeria. Preprints.
https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202410.1582.v1
18. Estampe, D. (2014). Supply chain performance and evaluation models. ISTE.
19. Fu, H., Cai, R., & Sun, K. (2025). Digital transformation strategy of port supply chain: A stochastic
evolutionary game method. Maritime Policy & Management. Advance online publication.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2025.2563209
20. Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C., & McGaughey, R. E. (2004). A framework for supply chain performance
measurement. International Journal of Production Economics, 87, 333347.
21. Hamisi, S. R. (2024). The effect of automated customs clearance systems on enhancing trade efficiency
in Tanzania. International Journal of Social Sciences and Management Research, 10(8), 408422.
https://doi.org/10.56201/ijssmr.v10.no8.2024.pg408.422
22. He, X., Hu, W., Li, W., & Hu, R. (2023). Digital transformation, technological innovation, and
operational resilience of port firms in case of supply chain disruption. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 190,
114811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.114811
23. Ifekanandu, C. C., & Asagba, S. (2025). Supply chain innovation and operational efficiency of food and
beverage manufacturing firms in South-South Nigeria. Journal of Advanced Research and
Multidisciplinary Studies, 5(2), 4662. https://doi.org/10.52589/JARMS-A8Z9HNJL
Page 1131
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
24. Ikeavuje, A. H., Anaba, D. C., & Iheanyichukwu, U. T. (2024). Optimizing supply chain operations
using IoT devices and data analytics for improved efficiency. Magna Scientia Advanced Research and
Reviews, 11(2), 7079. https://doi.org/10.30574/msarr.2024.11.2.0107
25. Ilin, I., Jahn, C., Weigell, J., & Kalyazina, S. (2019). Digital technology implementation for smart city
and smart port cooperation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Technologies in
Logistics and Infrastructure (ICDTLI 2019). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/icdtli19.2019.87
26. Kärst, D. (2023). Cloud-based supply chain monitoring in Nigeria. IoT Use Case GmbH.
https://iotusecase.com/en/solution-examples/cloud-based-supply-chain-monitoring-in-nigeria/
27. Khan, Y., Su’ud, M. B. M., Alam, M. M., Ahmad, S. F., Ahmad, A. Y. A. B., & Khan, N. (2023).
Application of Internet of Things (IoT) in sustainable supply chain management. Sustainability, 15(1),
694. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010694
28. Koritarov, T., & Dimitrakiev, D. (2024). The impact of digitalization on smart ports: Enhancing
efficiency, sustainability, and competitiveness in the maritime industry. The Scientific Heritage, 152,
2933. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14603507
29. Li, Y., Tian, X., Lu, Z., & Wu, J. (2025). Impact of digital transformation on sustainable development
of port performance: Evidence from Tangshan Port. Sustainability, 17(15), 6902.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17156902
30. Miller, J. (2024). Effect of digital transformation on supply chain resilience in the United States. Journal
of Strategic Management, 9(1), 4050. https://doi.org/10.47672/jsm.1870
31. Monios, J., & Wilmsmeier, G. (2022). A systems approach to developing a port community system for
South Africa. Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management, 16, a772.
https://doi.org/10.4102/jtscm.v16i0.772
32. Mubder, A. A. A. M. (2025). Port community systems and just-in-time arrival in port calls: Adoption
and outcome [Doctoral dissertation, Linköping University]. LiU-Tryck.
https://doi.org/10.3384/9789181183436
33. Nguyen, P. N., & Pham, T. Y. (2025). Assessing the impact of digital transformation on port efficiency
and market positioning in Southeast Asia container port system. The Asian Journal of Shipping and
Logistics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2025.11.002
34. Ning, L., & Yao, D. (2023). The impact of digital transformation on supply chain capabilities and supply
chain competitive performance. Sustainability, 15(13), 10107. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310107
35. NCS. (2025). Customs sets for digital cargo clearance, installs new scanner at Apapa Port. PRNigeria
News. https://prnigeria.com/2025/11/09/customs-sets-digital-cargo/
36. Okegbemi, A. C. (2024). Economic environment factors and how they suppress growth and
development in Nigeria. Academia.edu. Retrieved from
https://www.academia.edu/122486898/Economic_Environment_Factors_and_How_They_Suppress_
Growth_and_Development_in_Nigeria
37. Okere, C. C. (2022). Cargo handling equipment and ports performance in Nigeria. Journal of
Procurement & Supply Chain, 6(2), 4051. https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t4113
38. Otakulova, U. O. (2023). The role of “digital customs” in customs authority and improving it.
International Journal of Academic Accounting, Finance & Management Research, 7(7), 712.
39. Putra, A. P., Nuraisah, F., & Kuswantoro, M. W. (2024). The role of digital transformation on the
performance of Indonesia’s biggest dry bulk port. Procedia Computer Science, 234, 900908.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.03.078
40. Sarker, E. (2025). Digitalization in customs clearance [Master’s thesis]. Jamk University of Applied
Sciences.
41. Tsagkaris, P., & Moschovou, T. P. (2025). The impact of automation on the efficiency of port container
terminals. Future Transportation, 5(4), 155. https://doi.org/10.3390/futuretransp5040155
42. UNCTAD. (2021). Review of maritime transport 2021. United Nations Conference on Trade and
Development. https://unctad.org/publication/review-maritime-transport-2021
43. Walker, E. (2020). The impact of IoT on supply chain management: Real-time monitoring and control.
American Journal of Internet of Things, 1(3), 1523.
44. Whitten, G. D., Green, K. W. Jr., & Zelbst, P. J. (2012). Triple-A supply chain performance.
International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(1), 2848.
Page 1132
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
45. Wilhelm, J., Hoppe, N. H., Petzoldt, C., Rolfs, L., & Freitag, M. (2022). Evaluation of performance and
cargo-shock of an autonomous handling system for container unloading. Logistics Research, 15(10).
https://doi.org/10.23773/2022_10
46. Xiong, Q., Yang, J., Zhang, X., Deng, Y., Gui, Y., & Guo, X. (2025). The influence of digital
transformation on the total factor productivity of enterprises: The intermediate role of human-machine
cooperation. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 10(4), 100736.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2025.100736
47. Zhang, H., & Okoroafo, S. C. (2015). Third-party logistics (3PL) and supply chain performance in the
Chinese market: A conceptual framework. Engineering Management Research, 4(1), 3848.
48. Zhou, B. (2024). Research on the impact of digital supply chain on enterprise operation performance.
The EUrASEANs: Journal on Global Socio-Economic Dynamics, 6(49), 7493.