Page 1334
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
Impact of Proactive Quality Management Practices on Construction
Project Performance
Aakash Shah
1
, Jayraj Solanki
2
, Darshan Shah
3
, V. M. Patel
4
1
Student, Department of Civil Engineering, U. V. Patel College of Engineering, Ganpat University,
Kherva, Mehsana
2
Head PG & Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, U. V. Patel College of Engineering,
Ganpat University, Kherva, Mehsana
3
Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, U. V. Patel College of Engineering, Ganpat
University, Kherva, Mehsana
4
Asso. Executive Dean & Professor, Core Engineering Programs, U. V. Patel College of Engineering,
Ganpat University, Kherva, Mehsana
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150400114
Received: 26 April 2026; Accepted: 2 May 2026; Published: 20 May 2026
ABSTRACT
Quality management is an essential aspect of ensuring that construction projects are completed successfully.
Conventional approaches to quality control tend to be reactive since defects are detected after completion, which
necessitates rework, wasted materials, higher costs, and delayed schedules. To address such problems, the
construction sector is gradually embracing proactive quality management techniques that aim at preventing
defects and enhancing performance continuously.
The present study examines the effects of proactive quality management techniques on the performance of
construction projects. Specifically, the study addresses preventative inspections, method statements and quality
checklists, and worker and engineer training programs. In this research, a mixed-method design was utilized,
comprising questionnaires, interviews, site visits, and analysis of Non-Conformance Reports (NCRs). The
gathered data was analyzed using percentage analysis, Relative Importance Index (RII), and ranking techniques.
The results show that preventive inspections play a crucial role in recognizing any flaws in the early stages of
development, whereas the use of method statements and quality checklists brings about consistency in
construction operations. However, it was determined that training and skill development programs had the most
significant contribution to productivity levels, quality of workmanship, and eliminating recurrent flaws. This
study suggests that quality management approaches play an essential role in improving construction performance
by decreasing the occurrence of defects, minimizing rework, reducing the cost of poor quality (CoPQ), and
increasing productivity.
INTRODUCTION
The construction industry is a key contributor to economic development and infrastructure growth; however, it
is also one of the most challenging sectors to manage due to the involvement of multiple stakeholders, complex
execution processes, and high dependency on human resources. Construction projects frequently face quality-
related problems such as defective workmanship, non-compliance with specifications, repeated repairs, and
productivity losses, which ultimately affect project cost, schedule, and client satisfaction.
In many construction projects, quality control is traditionally carried out after completion of work, making it
reactive in nature. This approach leads to identification of defects at a late stage, resulting in rework, wastage of
materials, disruption of workflow, and loss of productivity. To overcome these limitations, modern construction
Page 1335
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
management practices emphasize the adoption of proactive quality management, which focuses on preventing
defects rather than correcting them after occurrence.
Proactive Quality Management Practices include preventive inspections, preparation and strict implementation
of method statements, use of systematic quality checklists, and continuous training of engineers, supervisors,
and workers. These practices are consistent with Quality Management System frameworks based on standards
issued by the International Organization for Standardization, particularly ISO 9001, which emphasize risk-based
thinking, process control, and continuous improvement. Evaluating the effectiveness of such proactive practices
is essential to improve construction project performance.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Sr.
No.
Title
Author
CONCLUSION
1
Enhancing project efficiency
through quality management
practices in the construction
industry
Sheel, & Pannu, S.
(2025)
Implementation of TQM and ISO
9001 improves coordination,
efficiency, and quality culture in
construction projects.
2
Exploring quality management
practices in construction projects: A
comprehensive literature review
Anand, P. D. (2024)
Integration of TQM, BIM, and
agile methods improves
construction planning efficiency
and overall project performance.
3
Study on quality management in
housing and multistorey building
construction project
Biju, P. V., Kumar, A.,
John, N., & Naadhan
(2024)
Identification of key quality factors
helps improve decision-making in
housing and multistorey
construction projects.
4
Quality management challenges in
construction projects: Investigating
factors, measures, and the role of
material quality control
Chin, H. S., Ting, S.
N., & Lee, Y. Y.
(2024)
Poor materials, weak supervision,
and ineffective QC implementation
are major causes of quality
failures.
5
Quality management in
construction projects
Egbebi, A. O. (2024)
Integration of quality management,
BIM, and sustainability improves
construction efficiency and
stakeholder satisfaction.
6
A study of quality control
management in construction
industry
Dhinagaran, S. B.
(2023)
Small and medium firms face more
quality control challenges due to
cost constraints and lack of
awareness.
7
Review paper on quality
management practices for
construction project delivery
Kwaponga, P., &
Pipaliya, J. (2023)
Innovative quality management
techniques improve construction
project delivery and client
satisfaction.
8
A study on evaluation of quality
management systems in
construction projects
Sheoran, V., & Thakur,
D. J. (2023)
ISO 9001:2015 improves
documentation, operational
Page 1336
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
efficiency, and customer trust in
construction organizations.
9
Evaluating quality management
system of construction projects
Ali, K., Mubin, S., &
Gavrishyk, E. (2022)
Weak planning, monitoring, and
limited top management
involvement result in ineffective
quality management systems in
construction companies.
10
Quality management on
construction site
Gadriwala, T., &
Solanki, J. V. (2021)
Proper material testing, curing,
documentation, and coordination
are essential for maintaining site
quality.
11
A study on quality management in
construction projects at Amravati
Rawale, P. P., &
Mahatme, P. S. (2021)
Structured quality control methods
and TQM adoption improve
project performance and
stakeholder satisfaction.
12
Analysis of quality on construction
and construction cost
Shukla, A. K., &
Sakale, R. (2021)
Increased supervision and regular
inspections reduce defects and
rework costs in construction
projects.
13
Impact of quality management in
construction on its productivity
Bharsakhale, S. (2020)
Lack of integrated QMS, poor
documentation, and equipment
maintenance reduce productivity in
construction projects.
14
Impact of quality control and
management in constructions
Priyadharsan, A. K. S.,
& Raja, M.(2020)
Quality control improves
engineering decisions and ensures
workers follow construction
quality standards.
15
Quality management of
construction project
Cao, J. (2018)
Low skill levels and weak
management systems significantly
affect construction quality and
require improved training and
responsibilities.
Research Gap Identification
From the above literature, the following research gaps are identified
1) Limited studies focus specifically on proactive quality management practices at site level.
2) Most research discusses general QMS without isolating preventive practices.
3) Few studies link proactive quality practices directly with productivity improvement.
4) Indian construction projects are under-represented in proactive quality research.
These gaps justify the need for the present study.
Data Collection and Analysis
There are different methodologies for data collection and analysis:
Questionnaire Survey (Quantitative Method)
Page 1337
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
Interview Survey (Qualitative Method)
Site Observation / NCR Survey (Evidence-Based Method)
Questionnaire Survey
Determination of Sample Size
The questionnaire survey was carried out to ascertain how Project Managers perceived the proactive quality
management strategies including preventive inspections, adherence to method statements and training. The study
population included 4,638 members who are registered in Gujarat Institute of Civil Engineers and Architects
(GICEA) consisting of professionals such as Civil Engineers, builders, contractors, architects, structural
consultants, valuers and town planners.
In this regard, the research was intended to look at site level quality implementation and QA/QC practices. In
that case, only those professionals involved in executing and supervising the quality at sites could be sampled.
In other words, professionals such as Civil Engineers, Builders and Contractors became target groups in the
study.
Sample size determination in this study was done by Cochran formula at 95% confidence level (Z = 1.96) and
maximum variability p=0.5, Finite Population Correction N=4638. Finally, the calculated sample size came to
be 38. In other words, a total of 38 Project Managers/Construction Managers were surveyed because of their
involvement in site level quality control, inspection, training allocation and project performance.
There are different objectivise justified after using methodologies:
Objective-01: To study the role of preventive inspections in minimizing defects and rework in construction
projects.
Figure 1. Bar Chart of responses for objective 1
Page 1338
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
Figure 2. Percentage Analysis of responses
From the analysis of the responses regarding preventive inspections, it is clear that preventive inspections are
well-recognized as an important mechanism for reducing defects and rework in construction projects. A large
number of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that inspections conducted before the start of work and at
critical stages of execution make a significant contribution to quality control.
Objective- 02 : To improve workmanship quality by effective implementation of method statements and quality
checklists in construction activities.
Figure 3. Bar Chart of responses for objective 2
Figure 4. Percentage Analysis of responses for Objective 2
Page 1339
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
Analysis of the results pertaining to method statements and quality checklists shows that there is a considerable
level of agreement among construction professionals regarding the significance of these tools in ensuring
workmanship standards. A large number of respondents agreed that method statements help define the sequence
of execution and ensure systematic working on site.
Objective- 03 : To develop effective training and skill development practices to enhance productivity and quality
performance in construction projects.
Figure 5. Bar Chart of responses for objective 3
Figure 6. Percentage Analysis of responses for Objective 3
Page 1340
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
Analysis of the response data related to training and skill development shows that the respondents believe
training to be the most significant proactive quality management aspect among the three objectives analyzed. A
vast majority of the respondents strongly agreed that training leads to better construction methods, increased
efficiency of workers, and fewer workmanship defects.
Interview Survey
The interview survey in this study was conducted using a semi-structured qualitative method to collect detailed
and practical insights from experienced construction professionals. While the questionnaire survey provided
numerical data through a structured 5-point Likert scale, it could only measure the level of agreement among
respondents. It did not fully explain the reasons behind certain practices or challenges observed on site.
Objective 1
To study the role of preventive inspections in minimizing defects and rework in construction projects.
How do preventive inspections help in reducing defects on site??
At which construction stages are preventive inspections most important?
What happens when preventive inspections are skipped due to time pressure?
Interview was conducted with Project Manager, Construction Manager, Site Engineer, Quality Engineer, Site
Supervisor were noted.
The interview responses clearly show that preventive inspections are an important factor in reducing defects and
rework. All six respondents agreed that conducting inspections prior to commencing critical activities such as
concreting, plastering, granite fixing, and waterproofing helps detect defects at an early stage.
The Quality Engineer and Site Engineer explained that detecting defects such as wrongly placed reinforcements,
inadequate chipping, incorrect proportions of mortar, and poor surface preparation at an early stage helps prevent
extensive rework at a later stage.
The Project Manager agreed that preventive inspections help improve coordination between the execution and
quality teams by ensuring mutual verification prior to commencing work.
Page 1341
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
However, most respondents agreed that time constraints and pressing deadlines sometimes cause inspections to
be hurried or partially bypassed. This is consistent with the questionnaire result, where the time pressure factor
recorded a lower RII (58.4%), suggesting difficulties in implementing it in practice.
The interview responses strongly confirm the questionnaire result (Objective RII = 80%), showing that
preventive inspections are important but sometimes impacted by time constraints.
Objective 2
To improve workmanship quality by effective implementation of method statements and quality checklists in
construction activities.
How do Method Statement help in improving workmanship on site?
Are Quality Checklist practically useful during site inspections?
What is main challenge in implementing method statement and checklist on site?
Interview was conducted with Project Manager, Construction Manager, Senior Engineer, Quality Engineer, Site
Supervisor were noted.
All participants in the interview agreed that method statements contain effective execution sequences and
technical instructions for carrying out construction work. The Construction Manager said that effective
explanation of method statements during toolbox talks can eliminate workmanship defects.
The Quality Engineer said that checklists ensure standardized inspection processes and minimize reliance on
personal judgment. The Site Supervisor said that activity-based checklists help make critical steps like surface
preparation and adhesive application non-negotiable.
However, some participants confessed that method statements are not always strictly adhered to, especially when
work is rushed or when experienced personnel think they know the process.
These interview results are consistent with the results of the questionnaire, where Objective 2 achieved a total
RII of 81%, indicating a strong level of agreement on the effectiveness of method statements and checklists in
enhancing workmanship quality.
Objective 3
To develop effective training and skill development practices to enhance productivity and quality performance
in construction projects.
How does training affect productivity on construction sites?
Is trained worker more productive than untrained worker?
What is biggest difficulty in conducting training program on site?
The analysis of the interview showed that training and skill development have the most practical impact on
improving productivity and quality. All interviewees agreed that trained manpower is more efficient in
performing tasks and produces less defective output.
The Project Manager said that regular training helps minimize repeat NCRs and enhances finishing quality. The
Quality Engineer said that after conducting focused training on plastering, measurement box, and granite fixing,
defect rates were substantially reduced. The Site Supervisor agreed that untrained new manpower is a significant
cause of workmanship defects.
The findings of the interview survey strongly support the questionnaire survey, where Objective has the highest
RII of 84% and the highest individual RII of 86.3% on the overall positive impact of training on productivity.
Page 1342
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
Alignment of Questionnaire and Interview Survey Findings
Objective
Interview Key Insight
Alignment Interpretation
Objective 1
Preventive
Inspections
All respondents agreed
inspections reduce defects
and prevent rework.
However, inspections are
sometimes rushed due to
schedule pressure.
Strong alignment. High RII
confirms inspections are
effective. Lower RII for time
pressure matches interview
concerns about deadlines
affecting implementation.
Objective 2
Method
Statements &
Checklists
Respondents stated method
statements standardize work
and checklists prevent
missing quality parameters.
Main challenge: urgency and
documentation compliance.
Strong alignment. Statistical
results confirm effectiveness,
while interviews explain
practical compliance
challenges.
Objective 3
Training & Skill
Development
All respondents strongly
agreed training reduces
defects, improves speed, and
reduces supervision effort.
Challenges: time allocation
and labor turnover.
Very strong alignment.
Highest RII matches
unanimous interview
agreement that training has
maximum impact on
productivity and quality.
The alignment table above clearly shows the consistency between the quantitative results (RII analysis) and the
qualitative results (interview survey). The three objectives clearly show a strong level of agreement between the
two methods, and training practices have been identified as the most important proactive quality management
tool.
Site Observation/NCR Survey
In this research, the Site Observation / NCR (Non-Conformance Report) survey was conducted specifically for
the purpose of validating the findings obtained from the questionnaire and interview surveys. The questionnaire
survey and interview survey are primarily based on the opinions, perceptions, and experiences of respondents.
Although these methods provide valuable insights and statistical analysis (such as RII values), they reflect what
professionals believe or perceive about preventive inspections, method statements, and training practices.
Figure 7. Nos of NCR/Observation and related COPQ
However, opinion-based responses alone are not sufficient to establish practical effectiveness. Therefore, the
Site Observation / NCR survey was conducted as an evidence-based assessment tool.
Page 1343
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
From the above analysis, it is apparent that preventive inspections are a widely adopted and highly effective
method in reducing defects and rework in construction projects. The findings from the questionnaire survey
revealed that over 80% of the respondents either agreed or strongly agreed that preventive inspections help in:
Early defect detection,
Reduction of rework, and
Overall improvement in construction quality.
The findings show that method statements and quality checklists are very effective tools in ensuring the quality
of workmanship and consistency in execution. A significant number of respondents agreed that method
statements are effective in defining work sequence, technical specifications, and quality standards.
While the organizational level of method statement preparation is strong, the enforcement level at the site seems
to be relatively weaker. This is evident from the number of “Agree” responses in the questions related to method
statement adherence and communication to the workers.
The highest RII values were found in the training-related questions, showing a strong level of agreement that
trained personnel:
Do the job right the first time,
Need less supervision,
Generate less rework and material waste,
Enhance overall site productivity.
However, despite the strong recognition of its importance, the consistency and frequency of training programs
were found to be inadequate. The interview findings pointed out the challenges of training, including labor
turnover, time management issues, and the inability to conduct systematic training sessions during busy project
schedules.
Findings from Data Analysis
1) The results of the study show that the use of pro-active quality management practices greatly improves
the quality of constructions and reduces the instances of defects. The preventive inspection was found to
be an effective practice for defect detection and improving the quality. However, due to time constrains
and the need to meet project deadlines, inspections are sometimes omitted or are partial, which leads to
more defects as revealed in the interviews and by NCRs.
2) Methods statements and quality checklists turned out to be good ways to ensure high quality and
consistent performance of construction processes. Organizations usually develop good documents, but
their implementation and distribution to the sites is still not very well done. According to interviews and
NCRs, non-compliance with methods statements and insufficient supervision are frequent reasons behind
workmanship defects.
3) Finally, the most positive impact was shown by the training and skill development programs. Almost all
respondents said that well-trained workers increase efficiency and decrease the number of mistakes,
errors, defects and rework. However, the study showed that training programs are usually inconsistent
because of labor turnover, time constrains and scheduling issues. It was revealed by interviewees and
NCR records that untrained labor
Limitations of the Study
Despite careful planning and systematic implementation, the study has certain limitations that should be
acknowledged
Page 1344
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
1. Limited Sample Size and Scope
The study was carried out with a targeted sample of 38 Project Managers/Assistant Managers and limited
site-level interviews. Although statistically valid using the Cochran formula, the results may not be
generalizable to the entire construction industry and regions.
2. Project Type Restriction
The study is limited to building construction projects carried out by organized construction companies.
Infrastructure projects such as highway projects, bridge projects, metro projects, and industrial projects were
excluded from the study. Hence, the results may not be applicable to these sectors.
CONCLUSION
The main aim of this research was to assess the impact of proactive Quality Management practices,
namely preventive inspections, method statements with quality checklists, and training and skill
development activities, on construction project performance. The results were obtained from a
questionnaire survey carried out among 38 Project Managers (sample size calculated using Cochran
formula), complemented by interview survey results and site Observation/NCR analysis.
The results have confirmed that preventive inspections are important in reducing defects and rework.
Over 80% of the respondents agreed that inspections carried out prior to execution and at critical stages
of construction help detect defects at an early stage. The interview results also supported that inspections
prior to concreting, plastering, and waterproofing operations prevent irrevocable mistakes. Nevertheless,
the results from both questionnaire (lower RII value for time pressure factor) and interview surveys
suggest that time pressures and fast-track construction schedules adversely impact the implementation of
inspections.
The study also concludes that method statements and quality checklists are useful tools in improving the
quality of workmanship and ensuring consistency in execution. The findings from the questionnaire
survey (RII ≈ 81%) show a high level of agreement on the need for standardized work procedures.
Interviews showed that, although method statements are available, strict communication and enforcement
at the worker level are inconsistent, particularly in finishing works. Analysis of NCRs showed that non-
compliance with method statements was a major reason for some defects.
The study also concludes that training and skill development activities have the strongest positive effect
on productivity and quality performance. Questions related to training had the highest RII values (≈ 84-
86%), showing a high level of agreement among respondents. Interviews showed that trained workers
perform better in terms of workmanship quality, reduced dependency on supervision, and lower repeat
NCRs. However, inconsistent training programs and employee turnover were identified as real-world
challenges in ensuring consistent skill levels.
The results of site observation and NCR survey analysis showed that the majority of non-conformities
were of preventable type. Root cause analysis showed that the factors contributing to the majority of non-
conformities were time pressure, lack of strict supervision, communication, and training. The variability
in quality performance was
REFERENCES
1. Ali, K., Mubin, S., & Gavrishyk, E. (2022). Evaluating quality management system of construction
projects. International Journal of Productivity and Engineering (IJPE), 18(7), 492–501.
2. Anand, P. D. (2024). Exploring quality management practices in construction projects: A
comprehensive literature review. International Journal of Progressive Research in Engineering
Management and Science (IJPREMS), 4(2), 358–365.
3. Ashokkumar, D. (2014). Study of quality management in construction industry. International Journal
of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 3(Special Issue 1), 36–41.
4. Bharsakhale, S. (2020). Impact of quality management in construction on its productivity. Journal
of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR), 7(8), 843–848.
Page 1345
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
5. Chin, H. S., Ting, S. N., & Lee, Y. Y. (2024). Quality management challenges in construction
projects: Investigating factors, measures, and the role of material quality control. Planning Malaysia:
Journal of the Malaysian Institute of Planners, 22(3), 63–78.
6. Dhinagaran, S. B. (2023). A study of quality control management in construction industry.
International Journal of Novel Research and Development (IJNRD), 8(5), 650–656.
7. Gadriwala, T., & Solanki, J. V. (2021). Quality management on construction site. International
Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 8(7), 831.
8. Kwaponga, P., & Pipaliya, J. (2023). Review paper on quality management practices for construction
project delivery. Rabindra Bharati University: Journal of Economics, XVI, 61–70.
9. Priyadharsan, A. K. S., & Raja, M. N. (2020). Impact of quality control and management in
constructions. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 7(5), 3968–
3973.
10. Rawale, P. P., & Mahatme, P. S. (2021). A study on quality management in construction projects at
Amravati. Open Access International Journal of Science and Engineering (OAIJSE), 6(7), 112–118.
11. Sheel, & Pannu, S. (2025). Enhancing project efficiency through quality management practices in
the construction industry. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Modern Education
(IJMRME), 11(1), 139–141.
12. Sheoran, V., & Thakur, D. J. (2023). A study on evaluation of quality management systems in
construction projects. International Journal of Membrane Science and Technology, 10(4), 2037–
2048.
13. Shukla, A. K., & Sakale, R. (2021). Analysis of quality on construction and construction cost.
International Journal of Scientific Research and Engineering Development, 4(1), 1169–1175.
14. Thamilarasu, V., Rajprasad, J., & Ram Prasanna, P. T. (2017). A case study on requirements of
quality workmanship in construction projects. International Journal of Civil Engineering and
Technology (IJCIET), 8(4), 1061–1067.
15. Mane, P. P., & Patil, J. R. (2015). Quality management system at construction project: A
questionnaire survey. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA), 5(3,
Part 3), 126–130.