Page 1447
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
The Role of Organizational Culture in Startup Success: A Study of
Bengaluru’s Emerging Businesses
1Merwin Abraham Mathew, 2Dr Zeena Flavia D' Souza*
1Research Scholar - School of Commerce, Finance and Accountancy, St Aloysius Deemed to be University and
Assistant Professor – St. Joseph’s College of Commerce (Autonomous)
2Associate Dean - School of Commerce, Finance and Accountancy, St Aloysius Deemed to be University
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150400119
Received: 29 April 2026; Accepted: 05 May 2026; Published: 21 May 2026
ABSTRACT
Startups operate under conditions of high uncertainty, limited resources, and intense competitive pressure. It
makes internal organizational factors crucial for survival and growth. Among these factors, organizational culture
plays a central yet often underestimated role in shaping entrepreneurial behaviour and performance outcomes.
This study examines how organizational culture influences startup success in Bengaluru, one of India’s most
prominent startup ecosystems. Drawing on the culture–capability–performance framework, the paper proposes
that locally embedded cultural practices. The practices such as innovation, autonomy, collaboration, ethical
orientation, and learning. These practices enhance intrapreneurship, employee creativity, and entrepreneurial
orientation, which in turn drive both financial and non-financial performance outcomes.
Based on an integrative review of entrepreneurship and organizational behaviour literature, the study tries to
develop a context-specific conceptual model and a set of testable hypotheses for Bengaluru-based startups. The
paper further argues that startup age, growth stage, and founders’ prior organizational experiences moderate the
strength of the culture and performance relationship. By evaluating organizational culture of Bengaluru’s startup
ecosystem, this research contributes to the growing literature on startup management and offers practical insights
for founders seeking sustainable growth beyond short-term scaling imperatives.
Keywords: Organizational culture, Startups, Intrapreneurship, Entrepreneurial orientation, Startup performance,
Bengaluru.
INTRODUCTION
Startups are widely viewed as key drivers of innovation, employment generation, and economic development.
Despite their importance, failure rates among startups remain high, especially during the early stages of growth.
While prior research has extensively examined external determinants of startup success, such as access to
finance, market conditions, and institutional support, internal organizational factors have received comparatively
less attention (Rauch et al., 2009). Among these internal factors, organizational culture is increasingly recognized
as a critical determinant of how startups respond to uncertainty, mobilize human capital, and sustain competitive
advantage.
Organisational culture is salient in startups because early-stage firms lack formal structures and rely heavily on
shared values, informal coordination, and founder-driven norms (Schein, 2010). Culture shapes how decisions
are made. How risks are taken. How employees engage with innovation and problem-solving. In high-velocity
environments, such as technology-driven startups, culture often substitutes for formal control systems and
becomes a key mechanism through which strategic intent is transformed into action.
Bengaluru provides an apt context to study the role of organizational culture in startups. Often described as
India’s startup capital, the city hosts technology firms, incubators, venture capital investors, and skilled
professionals. However, Bengaluru startups also face persistent challenges, including talent attrition, leadership
Page 1448
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
inexperience, regulatory complexity, and pressures associated with rapid scaling (NASSCOM, 2022). These
conditions amplify the importance of internal culture as a stabilizing force and a source of differentiation.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Organizational Culture
Organizational culture consists of the underlying values and norms governing the behavior of people inside
organizations (Schein, 2010). Organizational culture determines how people make sense of events around them,
cope with problems, and behave towards one another. According to the Competing Values Framework (Cameron
& Quinn, 2011), there are four different types of organizational cultures: clan culture, adhocracy culture, market
culture, and hierarchy culture. Previous research indicates that flexible organizational cultures—particularly clan
and adhocracy—support innovation and entrepreneurship better than hierarchical organizational cultures
(Hartnell et al., 2011).
The culture of a startup is often strongly shaped by values held by founders and their experience. Early cultural
decisions could have long-term impact on how employees think and behave even when the company scales up
(Baron et al., 1999).
Culture and Entrepreneurial Capabilities
Entrepreneurial capabilities are mediators through which culture impacts organizational performance.
Intrapreneurship means opportunities for employee-initiated projects involving opportunity identification and
innovative solutions to problems (Antoncic & Hisrich, 2003). There is considerable evidence suggesting that a
culture promoting autonomy, trust, and experimentation significantly boosts the level of intrapreneurship in
organizations (Kuratko et al., 2014).
Employee creativity and innovative behaviour depend on various aspects of organizational culture as well,
including emphasis on continuous learning, a psychologically safe environment, and open communication
(Amabile et al., 1996). Entrepreneurial orientation combines innovativeness, proactiveness, and risk-taking into
a strategic stance of firms. This concept has been empirically validated to be strongly associated with growth
and performance, especially in dynamic environments (Lumpkin & Dess, 1996).
Organizational Culture and Startup Performance
Performance in startups is multi-dimensional and includes more than just financial results. Non-financial
measures like employee motivation and turnover, speed of learning, and customer satisfaction are highly relevant
for young organizations (Wiklund & Shepherd, 2005). Empirical evidence shows that startups with empowering,
collaborative, and learning-oriented organizational culture achieve higher growth and profitability than startups
characterized by hierarchical control (Denison & Mishra, 1995).
Bengaluru Startup Ecosystem: Cultural Context
The startup ecosystems of Bengaluru benefit from technological capabilities, policies, and opportunities for
engaging international markets. On the other hand, the startup companies face various system issues like
unpredictable financing, employee turnover, and tough competition for qualified personnel. The ecosystem-level
issues often become culture-level problems that involve overworking, exhaustion, and the mentality of growth
at any cost (Upadhya, 2016).
One issue that recurs in Indian startups is the mindless adoption of Western corporate cultures, which might not
be relevant in terms of socio-economic conditions in India (Kumar & Puranam, 2020). In contrast, there exists
another feature in Bengaluru's startup scene that is referred to as "cultural spawning," which involves the
adoption of certain cultural DNA and business processes from previous organizations that the founder had been
associated with (Burton et al., 2019).
Page 1449
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
A mixed methodology is suggested to be used in the research. The quantitative part of the study involves survey
data gathering where 150-200 employees and founders of Bengaluru startups complete questionnaires related to
organizational culture, intrapreneurship, creativity, and entrepreneurial orientation using established
measurement instruments. Various performance measures were employed including subjective criteria and
financial ones.
For the qualitative study, interviews with founders and representatives of the Human Resources departments of
companies are planned. Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) and Partial Least Squares SEM (PLS-SEM) will
be applied to identify mediation and moderation effects.
Content validity is going to be ensured by experts' evaluation of the questions. Constructs' validity will be
estimated through Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Reliability will be evaluated using:
Cronbach’s alpha (α ≥ 0.70)
Composite reliability (CR ≥ 0.70)
Average variance extracted (AVE ≥ 0.50)
Discriminant validity will be established using the Fornell–Larcker criterion and Heterotrait–Monotrait
(HTMT) ratios (≤ 0.85).
Conceptual Framework and Hypotheses
This study proposes a culture–capability–performance framework tailored to the Bengaluru startup context.
Organizational Culture (Independent Variable)
Key dimensions include:
o Innovation and risk-taking
o Autonomy and empowerment
o Collaboration and trust
o Ethical orientation and transparency
o Learning orientation
o Structural flexibility versus hierarchy
Entrepreneurial Capabilities (Mediators)
o Intrapreneurship
o Employee creativity and innovation
o Entrepreneurial orientation
Startup Success (Dependent Variable)
Non-financial: employee engagement, retention, learning speed, customer satisfaction
Financial: revenue growth, profitability, funding rounds, valuation, survival
Measurement Instruments
Construct
Dimensions
Source
Organizational culture
Innovation, autonomy, collaboration,
ethics, learning orientation, flexibility
Cameron & Quinn (2011);
Denison & Mishra (1995)
Intrapreneurship
Proactiveness, initiative-taking,
internal innovation
Antoncic & Hisrich (2003)
Page 1450
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
Employee creativity & innovation
Idea generation, experimentation,
implementation
Amabile et al. (1996)
Entrepreneurial orientation
Innovativeness, proactiveness, risk-
taking, autonomy
Lumpkin & Dess (1996)
Startup performance (non-financial)
Engagement, retention, learning
speed, reputation
Wiklund & Shepherd (2005)
Startup performance (financial)
Revenue growth, funding, valuation,
survival
Self-reported and secondary
data
Hypotheses
H1: Innovation-oriented, autonomous, and collaborative cultures are positively associated with startup
performance in Bengaluru.
H2: Culture of intrapreneurship enhances the performance of the employees and the firm.
H3: Creativity and innovations are the mediators for the relationship between learning organizations and
performance of the start-up.
H4: Entrepreneurial orientation is the reason for the relationship between adhocracy, clan, and market
organization types and growth performance.
H5: Age and growth of the organization are the factors for the culture-performance relationship.
H6: Founders’ past experiences from organizational life act as a reason for cultural practices.
RESULTS AND ANALYSIS
A total of 178 usable responses were obtained from Bengaluru-based startups, representing early-stage, growth-
stage, and scaling ventures across technology-driven sectors. The respondent profile included founders (32%),
senior managers (28%), and core employees involved in innovation and decision-making roles (40%).
Preliminary analysis indicated no significant issues with missing data or outliers. Descriptive statistics suggest
moderate to high mean scores across most cultural dimensions, particularly innovation orientation and learning
orientation, reflecting the entrepreneurial nature of the sample.
Descriptive Statistics of Key Constructs
Construct
Mean
Innovation-oriented culture
3.92
Autonomy & empowerment
3.78
Collaboration & trust
3.85
Ethical orientation
3.69
Learning orientation
4.01
Intrapreneurship
3.74
Employee creativity & innovation
3.88
Entrepreneurial orientation
3.91
Non-financial performance
3.86
Financial performance
3.67
These values indicate that while Bengaluru startups demonstrate strong cultural and entrepreneurial capabilities,
financial outcomes tend to lag slightly behind non-financial indicators, particularly in early-stage firms.
Page 1451
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
Measurement Model Assessment
The measurement model was evaluated before hypothesis testing to assess reliability and validity. All constructs
exhibited satisfactory internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alpha and composite reliability values exceeding
recommended thresholds.
Reliability and Convergent Validity Results
Construct
Cronbach’s α
CR
AVE
Organizational culture
0.89
0.91
0.58
Intrapreneurship
0.85
0.88
0.56
Employee creativity & innovation
0.87
0.9
0.6
Entrepreneurial orientation
0.88
0.91
0.59
Startup performance
0.86
0.89
0.55
Discriminant validity was confirmed using the Fornell–Larcker criterion and HTMT ratios, all of which fell
below the recommended threshold of 0.85, indicating adequate construct distinctiveness.
Structural Model Results
The structural model was assessed using PLS-SEM with 5,000 bootstrap samples. Model explanatory power was
satisfactory, with R² values of 0.47 for entrepreneurial capabilities and 0.52 for startup performance, indicating
moderate to strong predictive relevance.
Structural Model Results (Direct Effects)
Path
β
t-value
p-value
Result
Organizational culture → Startup performance
0.3
4.91
<0.001
Supported
Organizational culture → Intrapreneurship
0.6
10.37
<0.001
Supported
Organizational culture → Creativity & innovation
0.6
9.84
<0.001
Supported
Organizational culture → Entrepreneurial orientation
0.5
8.96
<0.001
Supported
Intrapreneurship → Startup performance
0.3
4.12
<0.001
Supported
Creativity & innovation → Startup performance
0.3
3.87
<0.001
Supported
Entrepreneurial orientation → Startup performance
0.3
4.56
<0.001
Supported
These findings provide strong support for H1, confirming that organizational culture is positively associated
with startup performance among Bengaluru startups.
Mediation Analysis
Bootstrapped mediation analysis was conducted to test indirect effects of organizational culture on startup
performance through entrepreneurial capabilities.
Mediation Effects
Mediator
Indirect Effect (β)
t-value
Result
Intrapreneurship
0.18
3.94
Partial mediation
Creativity & innovation
0.15
3.62
Partial mediation
Entrepreneurial orientation
0.17
3.78
Partial mediation
The results indicate partial mediation, suggesting that organizational culture influences startup performance both
directly and indirectly through intrapreneurship, creativity, and entrepreneurial orientation. These findings
support H2, H3, and H4..
Page 1452
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
Moderation Analysis
Startup age and growth stage were examined as moderating variables. Interaction effects were significant for
early-stage startups, indicating that the positive impact of flexible and innovation-oriented cultures is stronger
during the initial phases of organizational development.
Moderation Effects
Moderator
Interaction β
t-value
Interpretation
Startup age
–0.19
2.87
Culture effects weaken as firms mature
Growth stage
–0.22
3.14
Stronger impact in early-stage startups
These findings support H5, suggesting that culture plays a more pronounced role when formal structures are still
evolving.
Founders’ Prior Experience and Cultural Spawning
Analysis further revealed that founders’ prior organizational tenure significantly moderated the culture–
performance relationship. Startups led by founders with longer tenures in coherent and innovation-oriented
parent organizations demonstrated stronger cultural alignment and superior performance outcomes.
Founder Experience Moderation Results
Founder Background
Culture → Performance (β)
Short tenure (<3 years)
0.21
Medium tenure (3–7 years)
0.33
Long tenure (>7 years)
0.41
This supports H6 and aligns with the concept of cultural spawning, whereby deeply internalized values are more
effectively transferred into new ventures.
CONCLUSION
The study explores the contribution of organizational culture in determining the success of start-ups within the
business environment of Bengaluru using a culture-capability-performance model grounded on an empirical
investigation. The results of this study indicate that organizational culture is not only symbolic but a strategic
asset that impacts both monetary and non-monetary performance. Innovative, autonomous, cooperative, ethical,
and learning cultures exhibit a strong positive association with performance. Entrepreneurial competencies, such
as intrapreneurship, innovation, creativity, and proactivity, partially mediate the relationship between culture and
performance. These entrepreneurial skills help individuals perform entrepreneurial activities by innovating and
exploiting market opportunities. Further, the presence of a strong relationship between culture and performance
indicates that organizational culture affects performance independent of entrepreneurial skills.
In addition, the results of the research also show that the creation of culture within organizations is context-
specific. Organizational age and maturity act as moderators that suggest that culture has more of an effect on
organizations at an earlier stage of development, but the relative importance of this phenomenon becomes less
significant as firms develop and other factors start becoming increasingly important. Furthermore, founders’
organizational experience becomes essential in determining the organization’s culture due to the fact that
founders who have experienced innovation and cohesion within organizations can bring these traits with them
into their firms. Finally, the results of the research emphasize that besides having access to financial resources,
technology, and markets, successful start-ups in Bangalore must also focus on building strong organizational
cultures that would help them achieve sustainable competitive advantages.
Page 1453
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
REFERENCES
1. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment
for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184.
2. Antoncic, B., & Hisrich, R. D. (2003). Clarifying the intrapreneurship concept. Journal of Small Business
and Enterprise Development, 10(1), 7–24.
3. Baron, J. N., Hannan, M. T., & Burton, M. D. (1999). Building the iron cage. Administrative Science
Quarterly, 44(3), 527–547.
4. Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture. Jossey-Bass.
5. Denison, D. R., & Mishra, A. K. (1995). Toward a theory of organizational culture and effectiveness.
Organization Science, 6(2), 204–223.
6. Hartnell, C. A., Ou, A. Y., & Kinicki, A. (2011). Organizational culture and effectiveness. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 96(4), 677–694.
7. Kuratko, D. F., Hornsby, J. S., & Covin, J. G. (2014). Diagnosing a firm’s internal environment for
corporate entrepreneurship. Business Horizons, 57(1), 37–47.
8. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct. Academy of
Management Review, 21(1), 135–172.
9. NASSCOM. (2022). Indian startup ecosystem report.
10. Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
11. Upadhya, C. (2016). Reengineering India’s new middle class. Economic and Political Weekly, 51(50),
37–43.
12. Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance. Journal
of Business Venturing, 20(1), 71–91.
13. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.
14. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). A primer on partial least squares structural
equation modeling. Sage.
15. Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G. T., & Frese, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and business
performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 761–787.