
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
,benefit after the sale and amount of profit, cost-benefit ratio and the cost-profit ratio and the percentage of profit
of 11 essential vegetables studied. Fig 3.1 presents costing of the vegetable cultivation which are the benefit of
the pants, the benefit of the vegetable showing in (Fig 3.2) which have VP2 rupees 3200 and VP9 rupees
30highest among them. Further Profit and benefit recorded respectively (Table 3.3 &3.4).The study of cost–
benefit ratio of cultivated plants VP2-4.57,VP9-375,VP6-2.82 and VP8-2.63.Next to the (Fig 3.7) presented
Cost–profit ratio of vegetable VP2-3.57,VP9-2.76 and VP6-1.82.respectivly.The calculation of % of profit has
been reported in terms of Percentage of cost by the Profit (Fig 3.8) highly profited vegetables has
VP2,VP9,VP11,VP6.(Fig-3.9) explore the data of cost-benefit and the profit given by vegetable plants gown on
RTF. Comparison of Cost-Benefit ratio and Cost-Profit ratio of growing vegetables has 4.57 and 3.57 VP2,
respectively. 3.76 and2.75 VP9 (Fig 3.10).Profit and Percentage of profit of different vegetable plants has
different. Finally highly profitable vegetable growing by most of the city farmers on rooftop farming..
CONCLUSSION
Various type of Vegetables cultivated on the RTF on the basis of profit making such as VP2, VP9, VP6 etc.
The profit depends upon the production, market value and demand. The vegetables demand increase by the
consumer choice and organic vegetable because of present of high nutritive value. Different season has different
demand and the price id altered accordingly. Best choice of vegetable cultivation as per the demand and price.
So the choice have vegetables plants are important for RTF. High profit vegetable cultivation has played an
crucial rule for perception and economic growth of urban farmers. For that has cultivation of vegetable on RTF.
The cost–benefit ratio analysis of rooftop farming vegetables cultivated plants need to choice of plants being
cultivated on rooftop farming.
Conflict of Interest
This original research article has the partial work of Ph.D thesis of author in Bhubaneswar city in India, The
funding of this research had spent by author. No any conflict of interest has been occurred in this to published
article.
REFERENCES
1. Estee, L.Y., Kishnani, N.T., (2010). Building-Integrated Agriculture: Utilizing Rooftops for Sustainable
Food Crop Cultivation in Singapore. J. Green Build. , 5, 105–113. doi.org/10.3992/jgb.5.2.105 [Google
Scholar] [Cross Ref.].
2. Alaima, K,, Packntt, E., Miles, R.A., Kruger, D. J., (2008). Fruits and vegetable intake among urban
community gardeners. NutrEduct Behav 40:94-101.doi:10,1016\j.jneb.2006.12.003.
3. Boardman, A. E., Moore, M. A., & Vining, A. R., (2020). The social discount rate for cost–benefit
analysis: A review of the debate and its implications. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 11(2), 272–293.
4. Buhler, D. and junge, R., (2016). Global trend and global status of commercial urban Rooftop Farming,
Sustainability, 8(12): 1108.
5. Carter, T. and Keeler, A. (2008). Life-cycle cost benefit analysis of extensive vegetated roof systems. Journal
of environmental management, 87(3): 350-356.
6. Hummel-Rossi, B., (2010).The state of cost–benefit and cost-effectiveness analyses in education.
Review of Educational Research, 80(2), 310–339.
7. Johansson, P.-O., & Kriström, B. (2018).Cost–benefit analysis for project appraisal. Energy Policy, 120,
654–660.
8. Nanaa, N. (2022). Urban rooftop farming: retrofitting a supermarket's rooftop with focus on food
production.
9. Robinson, L. A., Hammitt, J. K., & O’Keeffe, L., (2019). Valuing mortality risk reductions in global
benefit–cost analysis. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 10(S1), 15–50.
10. Sajjaduzzaman, MD., Koike, M. and Muhammed, N., (2005). An analytical study on cultural and
financial aspects of roof gardening in Dhaka metropolitan city of Bangladesh. Int. J. Agri. Biol., 7(2):
184-187.