Page 127
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
Automation of Pavement Material Testing Laboratory Process:
Review
Leka Heve Bonoro, Prapti Lalpuriya
Department of Civil Engineering, Parul Institute of Engineering & Technology, Parul University,
Waghodia Road 391760, Vadodara, India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150500012
Received: 27 April 2026; Accepted: 02 May 2026; Published: 22 May 2026
ABSTRACT
Pavement Materials Testing Laboratories (PMTLs) play a critical role in ensuring that pavement materials meet
the required specifications to sustain traffic loads and achieve design standards. This study investigates the
potential for transforming PMTL operations through the adoption of automation technologies, with a particular
focus on developing-country contexts such as Papua New Guinea (PNG). A systematic review of the literature
published up to 2025 was conducted using targeted keyword-search strategies to identify relevant advances in
laboratory automation across multiple sectors. The review highlights significant progress driven by the
integration of artificial intelligence (AI), the Internet of Things (IoT), robotics, and Laboratory Information
Management Systems (LIMS). However, findings indicate that PMTLs remain largely dependent on manual
processes, limiting efficiency, traceability, and data reliability. To complement the literature review, a case study
was undertaken using structured questionnaires distributed to laboratory personnel across six PMTLs and to
representatives from seven major road construction companies in PNG. The responses indicate strong support
for the adoption of automation to improve laboratory operations. The study identifies a critical research gap in
the absence of an integrated, end-to-end automated system capable of linking test requests, sample management,
personnel allocation, and equipment utilisation within a unified PMTL framework. While the benefits of
automation are evident, challenges related to sustainability, including funding constraints and limited resource
capacity, remain significant barriers to implementation. This research contributes to the development of a
conceptual foundation for PMTL automation, highlighting the need for scalable, context-specific solutions to
enhance quality assurance and operational performance.
Keywords: Laboratory Automation, LIMS, PMT, Laboratory Quality Assurance, ISO/IEC 17025:2017
INTRODUCTION
The performance and durability of road infrastructure depend on the quality and compliance of the construction
materials. PMTLs play a critical role in verifying that these materials meet the required engineering
specifications and performance standards [17]. Reliable and timely laboratory testing is therefore essential to
ensure that pavement systems can withstand increasing traffic demands and achieve design expectations
[13],[17]. However, in many developing countries, including PNG, PMTL operations remain largely manual,
limiting efficiency, traceability, and data reliability.
Current PMTL practices are characterised by fragmented workflows, limited system integration, and inadequate
real-time monitoring of laboratory activities and equipment. These challenges are further compounded by human
error, poor data management, and weak sample traceability. As a result, laboratories experience delays in
reporting, reduced confidence in test results, and inefficient use of resources, ultimately affecting infrastructure
quality and project delivery. Advancements in digital technologies, including AI, the IoT, robotics, and LIMS,
have significantly improved laboratory operations in other sectors [11],[12]. These technologies enable
automated data capture, real-time monitoring, and integrated workflows, leading to improved accuracy,
consistency, and efficiency [1]. Despite these benefits, their adoption in PMTLs remains limited, particularly in
resource-constrained environments. This limited adoption is largely due to constraints such as reliance on legacy
systems, inadequate infrastructure, financial limitations, and a lack of technical expertise. In addition, concerns
Page 128
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
regarding long-term sustainability, including system maintenance and workforce capacity, continue to hinder
implementation. Consequently, many PMTLs are unable to fully benefit from digital transformation, and
inefficiencies persist in key operational processes. Although automation has been widely studied in other
laboratory domains, there is limited research on its integrated application within PMTLs. In particular, there is
a lack of end-to-end systems capable of linking all laboratory functions within a unified framework. Addressing
this gap is essential for improving workflow integration and ensuring compliance with quality management
standards such as ISO/IEC 17025:2017 [16]. This study therefore investigates the potential to transform PMTL
operations through the adoption of integrated automation technologies. A systematic literature review is
conducted to identify relevant advancements, supported by a case study involving laboratory personnel and
construction stakeholders in PNG. The aim is to develop a conceptual, scalable, and context-specific automation
framework that enhances efficiency, improves data integrity and traceability, and supports reliable testing
outcomes. Ultimately, this contributes to stronger quality assurance and more durable road infrastructure systems.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Overview of the Literature Review
The development of a user-friendly, scalable, and cost-effective automated laboratory system, particularly in
resource-constrained environments, requires a clear understanding of existing technologies and their practical
use. This review examines current advances in laboratory automation and evaluates their relevance to PMTLs.
The focus is on key elements such as system integration, data management, and process optimisation, with
consideration of compliance requirements under ISO/IEC 17025:2017 [7],[9]. The review also identifies
common benefits and implementation challenges. This provides a basis for selecting appropriate technologies
that suit the operational and financial constraints of PMTLs.
Applications of Automation in Laboratory Systems
Automation technologies are widely used in laboratory and industrial settings. Their application has improved
efficiency, accuracy, and overall performance.
The Internet of Things (IoT) enables real-time monitoring and control through connected instruments and
sensors. It supports automated equipment operation, environmental monitoring, and remote access to systems
[3],[4],[5]. Artificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) improve data analysis by detecting patterns
and trends in large datasets. These tools support faster decision-making and more reliable interpretation of results
[6]. Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is used to handle repetitive and rule-based tasks such as data entry,
sample logging, and report generation. This reduces the manual workload and improves consistency [10],[12].
Information technology (IT)-based optimization systems improve workflow efficiency and reduce turnaround
time. These systems are particularly useful in high-demand laboratory environments [15],[2]. Cloud computing
provides flexible and secure platforms for storing and processing laboratory data. It also supports system
integration and allows laboratories to scale their operations as needed [2],[5]. Laboratory Information
Management Systems (LIMS) act as the central platform for managing laboratory activities. LIMS supports
sample tracking, workflow control, equipment monitoring, data analysis, and reporting, while also improving
compliance with regulatory standards [1],[8].
Impact of Automation on Quality Assurance
Quality assurance (QA) ensures that laboratory processes and outputs meet the required standards. In traditional
laboratories, QA depends heavily on manual checks and supervision. This approach can lead to delays and
inconsistencies. Automation improves QA by embedding control mechanisms directly into laboratory processes
[7],[9]. Systems can monitor activities in real time, including sample handling and data recording. This allows
immediate detection of errors or non-conformities. As a result, laboratory outputs become more consistent and
reliable. Automation also reduces dependence on manual oversight and strengthens overall process control. In
road construction and engineering applications, improved QA supports better decision-making and contributes
to higher-quality road infrastructure outcomes.
Page 129
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
Automation in Relation to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 Requirements
Automation supports compliance with ISO/IEC 17025:2017 by improving control, consistency, and traceability.
across laboratory operations. In document control, automated systems ensure that only current and approved
versions are used. Version control and approval workflows reduce the risk of outdated documents. Equipment
management is also improved. Systems can schedule calibration, track maintenance, and issue alerts when
equipment is due for servicing. This helps prevent the use of non-compliant equipment. Automation enhances
data integrity by enabling secure, paperless data handling. It reduces transcription errors and protects data from
unauthorized access. Personnel competency can be managed more effectively through digital records of training,
certification, and authorization. This ensures that only qualified staff perform specific tasks. Automation also
supports method validation through structured workflows and consistent data capture. In addition,
nonconforming work can be identified quickly through system alerts, allowing prompt corrective action. Overall,
automation strengthens the laboratory quality management system and supports sustained compliance with
ISO/IEC 17025:2017 [16].
Automation Benefits of Laboratory Automation
Automation improves laboratory performance in several ways. It enhances traceability by providing real-time
access to data. It also reduces human error by limiting manual data handling. Workflows become more efficient
and consistent through standardization. This leads to improved data quality and reproducibility of results.
Automation can reduce operational costs by improving resource utilisation and minimizing waste. It also
shortens turnaround time, as systems can operate continuously and perform multiple tasks simultaneously. In
addition, automation improves safety by reducing human exposure to hazardous environments and enabling
better monitoring of laboratory conditions.
Challenges of Automation
Despite its advantages, automation presents several challenges, especially in developing or resource-limited
environments. High initial costs and ongoing maintenance can limit adoption. Skilled personnel are required to
operate and maintain automated systems, making training essential. System integration can also be complex.
Different technologies and platforms must work together effectively, which may be difficult to achieve.
Infrastructure limitations, such as an unreliable power supply or inadequate digital systems, further restrict
implementation. In addition, limited experience with automation and quality systems can increase risks during
transition. In PMTLs, these challenges are often more pronounced due to existing inefficiencies and limited
resources. This highlights the need for practical, scalable, and context-specific automation strategies.
METHODOLOGY
Overview of the Methodology
This study adopts a systematic review and framework development approach to investigate and establish an
automation model for PMTL processes. The methodology integrates a structured literature analysis with
conceptual system design to identify, evaluate, and synthesise appropriate automation technologies applicable
to laboratory operations. The approach is guided by the objective of developing a practical, scalable, and cost-
effective automation framework tailored to resource-constrained environments. Emphasis is placed on
enhancing laboratory efficiency, improving data integrity, and ensuring compliance with ISO/IEC 17025:2017
requirements. The methodology further incorporates an applied component through a case-based assessment to
validate the relevance of the proposed framework within a real PMTL context.
PMTL Needs Assessment and Requirement Analysis
A comprehensive assessment of existing Pavement Materials Testing Laboratory (PMTL) workflows was
conducted to identify operational inefficiencies, system limitations, and areas requiring improvement. The
current laboratory processes, as illustrated in Figure 1, were systematically analysed across key functional stages,
Page 130
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
including request submission and billing, sample receipt and registration, test allocation and scheduling, data
recording and processing, and result validation and reporting. The assessment revealed that PMTL operations
remain predominantly reliant on manual and paper-based processes. This reliance contributes to fragmented
workflows, limited integration between laboratory functions, and inefficiencies in data management and process
coordination. Based on these observations, a gap analysis was undertaken to evaluate the discrepancies between
existing practices and the requirements of an automated laboratory system. The analysis identified several critical
challenges, including a strong dependence on manual data handling and record-keeping, a high susceptibility to
transcription and calculation errors, and a lack of integration across laboratory systems and processes. In addition,
delays in data processing, reporting, and decision-making were observed, along with an increased risk of non-
compliance with ISO/IEC 17025:2017 requirements. These findings established the functional and technical
requirements necessary for automation and provided a foundation for the design and development of an
integrated PMTL automation framework. Furthermore, the identified gaps informed the selection of appropriate
technologies and system components aimed at improving workflow efficiency, enhancing traceability, and
strengthening overall laboratory performance.
Figure 1:: PMTL Manual Process
System Design and Architecture
Based on the outcomes of the needs assessment and gap analysis, a conceptual PMTL automation system
architecture was developed to address identified inefficiencies and operational limitations. The system design
adopts a cost-effective, customized, modular, and integrated approach, enabling interoperability between
laboratory processes, equipment, and data management platforms. The proposed architecture consists of the
following customized core components: LIMS serves as the central platform for managing sample registration,
workflow coordination, data processing, and reporting. IoT Integration enables real-time monitoring of
laboratory equipment, environmental conditions, and test processes through connected sensors and devices. AI
and ML support data validation, anomaly detection, and predictive analysis to improve decision-making and
quality assurance. Automation Interfaces and Robotics facilitate the execution of repetitive laboratory tasks,
reducing manual intervention and improving consistency. Cloud-Based Infrastructure provides scalable data
storage, secure access, and system interoperability across multiple users and locations. The customized system
is designed to enable end-to-end integration of laboratory operations, linking test requests, sample tracking,
personnel allocation, equipment utilisation, and result reporting within a unified digital environment. This
Page 131
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
architecture ensures real-time data flow, improved traceability, and enhanced compliance with ISO/IEC
17025:2017 requirements.
Case Study Design and Data Collection
Case Study Approach
A case study was conducted to assess the applicability of the proposed framework in PNG. This approach allows
for the collection of real-world data from industry stakeholders and provides insight into current practices and
readiness for automation.
Sampling Method and Justification
A purposive sampling method was adopted in this study to select participants with relevant expertise and direct
involvement in PMTL operations. This approach is appropriate given the specialised and relatively small target
population, where respondents are required to possess adequate technical knowledge of laboratory processes and
practices. Furthermore, the study emphasises obtaining in-depth insights rather than achieving broad statistical
generalisation, making purposive sampling suitable for capturing informed and experience-based perspectives.
The sample comprised laboratory personnel from six PMTLs and representatives from seven major road
construction companies. These groups were deliberately selected due to their direct engagement in laboratory
testing activities and their reliance on laboratory results for operational and decision-making purposes. Their
involvement ensures that the data collected reflect practical realities and industry-specific challenges relevant to
PMTL automation.
Questionnaire Design
The questionnaire was developed based on insights obtained from the literature review and the needs assessment.
It was structured into five key sections covering current laboratory practices, operational challenges, awareness
of automation technologies, perceived benefits and barriers, and readiness for automation. The instrument
included both closed-ended and open-ended questions. Closed-ended questions were used to generate
quantifiable data for statistical analysis, while open-ended questions allowed respondents to provide detailed
insights and elaborate on their experiences and perspectives.
Sample Collection
A total of thirteen (13) questionnaires were distributed to sixty (60) laboratory personnel: ten (10) from each of
the six PMTLs. Out of the sixty (60), forty-nine (49) participants had significant issues in the laboratory process;
this was evaluated as eleven (11) valid responses received from the 13 questionnaires initially distributed,
resulting in a response rate of eighty-five percent (85 %), indicating issues with the laboratory process. The other
three (3) questions were issued to seven contractors in PNG; five (5) contractors had issues with the laboratory
process. This was then evaluated as two (2) valid responses received from the three (3) questionnaires
administered, resulting in a response rate of sixty-seven percent (67%) indicating issues with the PMTL process.
The support for Automation was collected from the sixty (60) participants with the six (6) PMTLs; forty-eight
(48) supported automation. While six (6) out of the seven (7) contractors agreed to automation. The outcome of
the study indicated strong support for automation from both scenarios, with eighty percent (80%) and eighty-
five percent (85) respectively. The collected data were screened for completeness and consistency prior to
analysis to ensure data quality and reliability, and the results are presented in Table 1. The sample size is
considered adequate for an exploratory case study, where the emphasis is on obtaining detailed, context-specific
insights rather than statistical generalisation. The relatively high response rates indicate strong participant
engagement and contribute to the reliability of the findings. This case study therefore serves as a critical
validation component, linking the proposed framework to real-world laboratory conditions and stakeholder
expectations.
Page 132
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
Table 1: Case Study Response Summary
Category
No. of people used
Support for Automation
Six PMTL in PNG
Total Questionnaires
13
60
80%
Response received on the issues.
11
49
Response rate on issues
Seven Contractros in PNG
Total Questionnaires
3
7
85%
Response received on the issues.
2
5
Response Rate on issues
Data Analysis Methods
The data obtained from the literature review and case study were analysed using a mixed-methods approach,
combining qualitative and descriptive quantitative techniques. Qualitative analysis was applied to interpret
responses related to challenges, opportunities, and perceptions of automation. Thematic analysis was used to
identify recurring patterns and key issues affecting PMTL operations. Quantitative analysis involved
summarising questionnaire responses using descriptive statistics, such as frequencies and percentages, to
evaluate the level of support for automation adoption. The integration of these methods enabled a comprehensive
evaluation of both theoretical insights and practical perspectives, strengthening the reliability of the study
findings.
Framework Development
The development of the PMTL automation framework was informed by a combination of findings derived from
the literature review, results obtained from the needs assessment and gap analysis, and insights generated through
the case study. These components collectively provided a comprehensive foundation for identifying system
requirements and defining the structure of the proposed solution. Based on this integrated analysis, a conceptual
framework was designed to consolidate key laboratory functions within a cohesive,automated system
environment. The framework enables end-to-end integration of laboratory workflows, facilitating seamless
coordination from test request initiation through to final reporting. It incorporates real-time data management
capabilities to enhance traceability and ensure continuous monitoring of laboratory activities. In addition, the
framework supports the automation of critical laboratory processes, thereby reducing manual intervention and
improving operational efficiency. The proposed system is further aligned with the quality management principles
outlined in ISO/IEC 17025:2017, ensuring that compliance requirements are embedded within the automated
processes. Emphasis is placed on scalability and adaptability, allowing the framework to be effectively
implemented in resource-constrained environments while maintaining the flexibility to accommodate future
technological advancements and improvements in infrastructure and technical capacity.
Validation of the Proposed Framework
The proposed automation framework was validated using a multi-criteria approach that combined comparative
analysis, expert feedback, and a case study-based assessment. Initially, the framework was evaluated through a
systematic comparison with existing PMTL practices to determine its effectiveness in addressing identified
operational gaps. Particular attention was given to improvements in workflow integration, data management,
traceability, and overall process efficiency. To strengthen the validation, the proposed framework was further
assessed against established automation practices in other laboratory sectors. This comparative evaluation
ensured alignment with proven technological approaches and industry standards, particularly in relation to
system integration, real-time data processing, and quality management compliance. In addition, expert feedback
was incorporated into the validation process. Domain experts, including laboratory managers and quality
professionals familiar with ISO/IEC 17025:2017, reviewed the framework to assess its technical soundness,
feasibility, and alignment with practical laboratory requirements. Their input provided critical insights into
system functionality, implementation challenges, and potential areas for refinement. A case study-based
validation was also undertaken using data collected from PMTL personnel and contractor representatives. The
Page 133
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
responses were analysed to evaluate the level of acceptance, perceived usefulness, and readiness for adopting
the proposed system. The findings indicated strong support for automation and confirmed the relevance of the
framework in addressing current operational challenges within the PNG context. The integration of these
validation methods ensures that the proposed framework is not only theoretically robust but also practically
viable. It demonstrates strong alignment with user needs, industry practices, and operational realities, making it
suitable for implementation in resource-constrained and underdeveloped-country environments.
FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
The findings of this study, derived from the review of recent literature published up to 2025, indicate that
laboratory automation has significantly transformed operational practices across multiple sectors, including
medical, pharmaceutical, and scientific laboratories. These advancements have been particularly evident in
developed countries, where the integration of automation technologies has enhanced efficiency, accuracy, and
overall quality assurance. In contrast, laboratories in developing countries such as PNG continue to rely
predominantly on manual processes, largely due to limitations in financial resources, infrastructure, and technical
capacity. Despite these constraints, the technologies identified in the literature, such as artificial intelligence, the
Internet of Things, robotics, and Laboratory Information Management Systems, demonstrate strong potential for
application within PMTLs, provided that they are appropriately adapted to the local context. PMTLs play a
critical role in transportation engineering by ensuring the quality and certification of pavement materials, thereby
supporting reliable road design and construction outcomes.
A key finding of this study is the identification of a significant research and operational gap: namely, the absence
of an integrated, end-to-end automated system capable of linking test requests, sample handling and registration,
personnel allocation, and equipment monitoring within a unified framework. This lack of integration contributes
to inefficiencies, limited traceability, and an increased risk of errors in laboratory operations. Furthermore,
inadequate laboratory infrastructure continues to compromise safety, quality, and compliance with established
standards, presenting an ongoing challenge for PMTLs in resource-constrained environments. The results
obtained from the case study further highlight that, despite these challenges, PMTLs in PNG operate under
considerable pressure to deliver timely and accurate results in response to the increasing demand. While
laboratories strive to maintain reliability in their outputs, the findings reveal that the risks associated with manual
processes, particularly in relation to data handling, traceability, and error management, are significant and may
undermine the integrity of test results. These findings underscore the urgent need for the development and
implementation of a customized automation framework tailored to the specific operational and resource
conditions of PMTLs in developing countries. Such a system would address existing inefficiencies, enhance data
integrity, and improve overall laboratory performance, thereby supporting the delivery of high-quality and
sustainable road infrastructure.
CONCLUSION
This study demonstrates that digital automation technologies have significantly transformed laboratory
operations across medical, scientific, and industrial sectors, leading to improved efficiency, reduced reliance on
manual labour, and enhanced quality and reliability of results. Despite these advancements, PMTLs remain
largely dependent on manual processes, particularly in areas such as sample handling, test scheduling, personnel
coordination, and equipment utilisation. The findings of this research highlight the strong potential of adopting
automation technologies, including AI, the IoT, robotics, and LIMS, to transform PMTL operations. However,
it is evident that a generic approach to automation is insufficient; instead, a customized and context-specific
system design is required to effectively address the unique operational challenges and constraints of PMTL
environments.
While the benefits of automation are substantial, the study identifies sustainability as a critical barrier to
successful implementation. Challenges related to financial constraints, infrastructure limitations, and technical
capacity continue to hinder the adoption of automation in developing countries. In particular, the digitalisation
of laboratory equipment, data processing systems, and reporting mechanisms requires consistent investment and
long-term strategic support. Therefore, the successful implementation of PMTL automation depends not only on
Page 134
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
the availability of appropriate technologies but also on sustained funding, infrastructure development, and
capacity building. Addressing these factors is essential to enable the transition toward integrated, automated
laboratory systems that improve operational efficiency, ensure data integrity, and support the delivery of high-
quality and sustainable road infrastructure.
REFERENCE
1. Alhammad L. A., Ainosah T. K., Ahmad A. M., Samarkandi M. S., Jawi N. H., Alharthi M. A., Alsharif
A.M., Anazi E A.A., Aldugeshem S.A., Johali F.Y. “The Impact of Laboratory Automation on
Efficiency and Accuracy in Healthcare Settings” International Journal of Community Medicine and
Public Health, (2023)
https://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20233857
2. Buyya R., Yeo C.S.; Venugopal S.; Broberg J. & Brandic I. Cloud Computing and Emerging IT
Platforms: Vision, Hype, and Reality for Delivering Computing as the 5th utility” Future Generation
Computer Systems (2008).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2008.12.001
3. Calderón D., Folgado F.J., González I., Calderón A.J . (2024). Implementation and experimental
application of industrial IoT architecture using automation and IoT hardware/software”. Sensors, 24(24),
8074. (2024)
https://doi.org/10.3390/s24248074
4. Dastjerdi A.V., Buyya R. Fog Computing: Helping the Internet of Things realize its potential
Computer, (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2016.245
5. Guerrero-Osuna H.A.,.García-Vázquez F., Ibarra-Delgado S., Mata-Romero M.E., Nava-Pintor J.A.,
Ornelas-Vargas G., Castañeda-Miranda R., Rodríguez-Abdalá V.I. & Sánchez L.S O. Developing a
Cloud and IoT-Integrated Remote Laboratory to Enhance Education 4.0: An Approach for FPGA-Based
Motor ControlJournal of Applied Sciences, (2024).https://doi.org/10.3390/app142210115
6. Hoodbhoy Z., Hasan B., Siddiqui K.
.
Does artificial intelligence have any role in healthcare in low
resource settings?” Vol 2 (July 2019): Journal of Medical Artificial Intelligence, (2019).
https://doi.org/10.21037/jmai.2019.06.01
7. Hajek M., Bavio M.A, Benesch T.N, Suárez R.C., Hamel N., Pinak M. &Tucker D.M., Wilding
A.. ,“Experiences in Transitioning a Testing Laboratory to the New ISO/IEC 17025:2017 Standard”
Radiation Protection Dosimetry, Volume 199, Issue 15-16, Pages 1670
1673, (2023).https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncac209
8. Oakley T., Vaz J., da Silva F., Allan R., Almeida D., Champlin K., da Silva E.S., Tilman A. J., Marr
1, Smith-Vaughan H., Yan J., & Francis J.R. Implementation of a Laboratory Information
Management System (LIMS) for Microbiology in Timor-Leste: Challenges, Mitigation Strategies, and
End-user Experiences” BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making,
(2025).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02831-6
9. Okezue M. A., Adeyeye M.C., Byrn S.J., Abiola V.O. & Clase K.L. “Impact of ISO/IEC 17025
Laboratory Accreditation in Sub-Saharan Africa: case study BMC Health Services Research (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05934-8
10. Ochiai K., Tahara-Arai Y., Kato A., Kaizu K., Kariyazaki H., Umeno M., . Takahashi K, Kanda G.
N., OzakiH., Automating Care by Self-Maintainability for full laboratory automation” Royal Society
of Chemical, (2025).
https://doi.org/10.1039/d5dd00151j
11. Plebani M. Total Laboratory Automation: Fit for Its Intended Purposes? The Journal of Clinical
Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, (2025).
https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2025-0855
12. Rupp N., Ries R.,Wienbruch R., Zuchner T. Can I benefit from laboratory automation? A Decision Aid
for the Successful Introduction of Laboratory Automation,” Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry,
(2023)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-023-05038-2
13. Saliba J., Al-Shaar W., .Delage M. “Comparison of Field and Laboratory Tests for Soil Suitability
Assessment in Raw Earth Construction” Applied Science (MDPI), (2024).
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15041932
14. Syed M., Bandara S., French G., Stewart S. A systematic literature review on Intelligent Automation:
Aligning Concepts from Theory, Practice, and Future Perspectives” Advanced Engineering Informatics,
(2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2021.101246
Page 135
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
15. Zhang L., Liu Z.H., Lv, S Y. J.. Fu Z.M. & Guo L.M.L.. “Comprehensive Improvements in the
emergency laboratory test process based on Information TechnologyBMC Medical Informatics and
Decision Making, (2023).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02387-x
16. International Standard Organisation. ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General Requirements for the Competence of
Testing and Calibration Laboratories. ISO/IEC 17025:2017(E) ed 2017.
17. PNG Department of Works Roads & Bridges Specification, 2015
www.works.gov.pg