INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue IV, April 2026
Application Suitability Analysis
Benchmarking the results against the Kenya Standard KS 2769:2018 identifies appropriate application domains
for these materials. The control mix qualifies for light vehicular traffic. The 5 percent PET composite borders
on the 15 MPa threshold required for Class 15 pedestrian applications. We designate Mix A as the optimal
formulation for non-traffic environments. These include pedestrian walkways, garden paths, public plazas, and
internal non-load-bearing partition walls. We relegate mixes exceeding 10 percent replacement to decorative
landscaping features. Structural integrity is not a design constraint here. You apply these materials based on your
specific load requirements.
CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK
This study systematically investigated incorporating unrefined PET waste into cementitious composites. This
addresses the concurrent plastic pollution and aggregate scarcity crises in Kenya. You will find the key findings
and future recommendations listed below.
1. Integrating shredded PET waste reduces the density of precast concrete by up to 13.4 percent. This offers you
logistical and structural dead-load benefits.
2. Workability decreases linearly with plastic content due to high inter-particle friction and hydrophobicity.
Standard vibration equipment remains sufficient for your compaction up to 20 percent replacement.
3. Water absorption increases with higher PET volume due to ITZ micro-voids. All tested mixes remained below
the 7 percent maximum threshold specified by KS 2769:2018.
4. Compressive strength drops due to the weak ITZ and stiffness incompatibility between PET and cement. The
5 percent mass replacement mix is the structural optimum. It achieves 14.49 MPa at 28 days.
5. The 5 percent PET composite is feasible for commercial deployment in Class 15 applications like pedestrian
walkways. A production rate of 100 cubic meters per month sequesters approximately 60 tonnes of plastic waste
annually. This drives direct contributions toward UN Sustainable Development Goals 9, 11, and 12.
6. Future research phases must actively address the weaknesses found at the particle boundary layer. Researchers
should implement and test chemical surface treatments on the recycled PET flakes. Applying sodium hydroxide
etching or silane coupling agents will improve adhesion at the ITZ and mitigate compressive strength loss.
7. Future researchers must conduct extended durability testing beyond the initial 28-day curing period. They
need to assess material performance under continuous environmental exposure and physical wear.
8. Future researchers must explore alternative mix designs with supplementary cementitious materials. This will
offset the mechanical penalties introduced by shredded plastic aggregates.
REFERENCES
1. Agyeman, S., Obeng-Ahenkora, N. K., Assiamah, S., and Twumasi, G. (2019). Exploiting recycled
plastic waste as an alternative binder for paving blocks production. Case Studies in Construction
Materials, 11, e00227.
2. American Society for Testing and Materials. (2015). ASTM C642 Standard Test Method for Density,
Absorption, and Voids in Hardened Concrete. ASTM International.
3. Fraternali, F., Ciancia, V., Chechile, R., Rizzano, G., Feo, L., and Incarnato, L. (2011). Experimental
study of the thermo-mechanical properties of recycled PET fiber-reinforced concrete. Composite
Structures, 93(9), 2368–2374.
4. Kenya Bureau of Standards. (2018). KS 2769:2018 Precast Concrete Paving Blocks. KEBS.
5. National Environment Management Authority. (2023). Kenya Plastic Waste Baseline Survey Report
2022–2023. NEMA.