Page 2508
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
Resonix - Environmental Sound Classification and Haptic Alert
System for Hearing-Impaired Assistance
Emrald Regin H R
1
, Kaaviyaa I
2
, Dr. Ashok Kumar B
3
, Dr. Charles Raja S
4
1,3,4
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Thiagarjar College of Engineering
2
Department of Computer Science and Business Systems, Thiagarjar College of Engineering
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150500200
Received: 17 May 2026; Accepted: 01 June 2026; Published: 15 June 2026
ABSTRACT
Hearing-impaired individuals often face difficulty in recognizing important environmental sounds such as
sirens, alarms, and warning signals, which can affect their safety and situational awareness in daily life. This
paper presents Resonix, an AI-based wearable assistive system designed to identify critical environmental
sounds and provide real-time haptic alerts through vibration patterns. Environmental sound datasets including
ESC-50 and UrbanSound8K were utilized for model development. Five relevant sound classes siren, dog
bark, alarm, baby cry, and glass break were selected for classification. Audio preprocessing techniques such
as normalization and noise reduction were performed before training the models. Multiple machine learning
models including KNN, SVM, Random Forest, and a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) were evaluated for
environmental sound classification. Experimental results showed that the proposed CNN model achieved the
highest accuracy of 93.0% compared to other models. The trained model was integrated with an ESP32-based
wearable setup consisting of three microphone modules, two vibration motors, and an emergency push button
for real-time haptic alert generation. The proposed system aims to improve environmental awareness and assist
hearing-impaired individuals through a simple and low-cost wearable solution.
Keywords: Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Wearable Assistive System, Haptic Alert System, ESP32,
Machine Learning, Audio Classification
INTRODUCTION
Hearing-impaired individuals often face challenges in recognizing important environmental sounds such as
alarms, sirens, and warning signals, which can affect their safety and daily activities. Traditional hearing aids
mainly amplify surrounding audio but may not effectively identify critical sound events in noisy environments
[1]. Environmental Sound Classification (ESC) has emerged as an important research area in assistive
technology and audio intelligence applications [2]. Deep learning approaches, especially Convolutional Neural
Networks (CNNs), have shown effective performance in recognizing environmental sounds from audio datasets
[3]. This work proposes Resonix, an AI-based wearable assistive system for environmental sound recognition.
The system classifies sounds such as siren, dog bark, alarm, baby cry, and glass break, and generates vibration-
based alerts using an ESP32-based wearable setup to improve environmental awareness for hearing-impaired
users [12].
Recent studies have demonstrated that deep learning techniques, particularly Convolutional Neural Networks
(CNNs), achieve superior performance compared to traditional machine learning algorithms for environmental
sound classification [2], [3]. CNNs automatically learn discriminative temporal and spectral features from audio
signals [3], [4], making them suitable for real-time assistive applications. Motivated by these advancements,
this work explores the use of CNN-based sound recognition integrated with wearable haptic feedback
technology for hearing-impaired users, similar to recent sound accessibility and assistive technology research
[8], [12], [13].
Page 2509
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
Experimental Procedure
Environmental sound datasets namely ESC-50 and UrbanSound8K were used for model development and
evaluation [1]. Five environmental sound classes siren, dog bark, alarm, baby cry, and glass break were
selected for classification. The audio samples were preprocessed using normalization and noise reduction
techniques before model training.
Dataset Description
A total of 2000 audio samples were selected from ESC-50 and UrbanSound8K datasets. Approximately
400 samples were used for each sound class including siren, dog bark, alarm, baby cry and glass break.
The dataset was divided into 80% training and 20% testing data.
Audio Preprocessing
Audio signals were normalized to maintain consistent amplitude levels and noise reduction techniques
were applied to minimize background interference. The audio recordings were resampled and segmented
into fixed-duration clips before feature extraction.
Feature Extraction
Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCCs) and Mel Spectrograms were extracted from the audio
signals. These features effectively represent temporal and spectral characteristics of environmental sounds
and were used as inputs to the classification models.
CNN Architecture
The proposed CNN architecture consists of two convolutional layers containing 32 and 64 filters respectively
with ReLU activation. Each convolution layer is followed by max-pooling. A fully connected dense layer of
128 neurons and a Softmax output layer were used for classification.
Training Parameters
The CNN model was trained using the Adam optimizer with categorical cross-entropy loss. Training was
performed for 50 epochs with a batch size of 20 and learning rate of 0.001. Model performance was
evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score metrics.
Multiple machine learning models including KNN, SVM, Random Forest, and Convolutional Neural
Network (CNN) were implemented for environmental sound classification [2]. The dataset was divided
into training and testing sets for performance evaluation. Accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score were
used to compare the performance of different models [5].The comparative analysis indicates that the CNN
model achieved superior performance across all evaluation metrics. The trained CNN model was
integrated with an ESP32-based wearable setup containing three microphone modules, two vibration
motors, and an emergency push button. When a sound was detected and classified, the ESP32 generated
vibration alerts to notify hearing-impaired users in real time [12].
Working
The working of the proposed Resonix system begins with the three microphone modules capturing surrounding
environmental sounds from different directions in real time. The acquired audio signals are preprocessed and
passed to the trained environmental sound classification model. The CNN model analyzes the input audio and
classifies it into one of the selected sound categories such as siren, dog bark, alarm, baby cry, or glass break.
After classification, the ESP32 microcontroller receives the output signal and activates the vibration motor to
generate haptic alerts for the user. Different environmental sounds can be indicated using distinct vibration
patterns, allowing hearing-impaired individuals to identify important environmental events through tactile
Page 2510
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
feedback. The overall system enables real-time environmental awareness using a compact wearable setup.
Figure 1: Workflow Diagram
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Software and Machine Learning Models
The performance of different machine learning and deep learning models was evaluated using accuracy,
precision, recall, and F1-score metrics for environmental sound classification. The comparative analysis was
carried out using KNN, SVM, Random Forest, and the proposed CNN model. Among all the evaluated models,
the proposed CNN model achieved the highest classification accuracy for environmental sound recognition with
an overall accuracy of 93.0%. The improved performance of the CNN model was mainly due to its capability
to automatically learn discriminative and high-level audio features from environmental sound samples without
requiring manual feature selection [2], [3]. Deep learning-based environmental sound classification models have
demonstrated strong performance in recognizing complex environmental audio patterns in recent studies [6].
The comparison results clearly indicate that deep learning approaches are more effective for environmental
sound classification tasks than conventional machine learning techniques. The proposed CNN model
demonstrated superior learning capability by effectively extracting complex spectral and temporal audio patterns
from the environmental sound dataset. Similar CNN-based environmental sound classification systems have also
reported improved performance due to automatic feature learning and deep hierarchical representations [8], [10].
The proposed model achieved a precision of 92.7%, recall of 92.4%, and F1-score of 92.5%, showing balanced
and reliable classification performance across all selected sound classes.
The normalized confusion matrices further illustrate the classification performance of the evaluated models. The
Page 2511
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
confusion matrices of KNN and SVM models showed higher off-diagonal values, indicating increased
misclassification among environmental sound categories. Random Forest demonstrated comparatively better
class-wise prediction performance with reduced classification errors. In contrast, the proposed CNN model
showed strong diagonal dominance in the normalized confusion matrix, indicating accurate class-wise prediction
with minimal misclassification. Slight confusion was observed between alarm and baby cry sounds due to
similarities in audio frequency characteristics and temporal sound patterns [11].
The trained CNN model was integrated with the ESP32-based wearable setup for real-time environmental sound
recognition and assistive alert generation. When an environmental sound was detected and classified, the
corresponding output triggered vibration-based haptic alerts through the wearable device to notify hearing-
impaired users. Similar wearable sound awareness systems have shown the effectiveness of vibration-based
assistive alerts for hearing-impaired individuals [12], [13]. The overall system demonstrated effective
environmental sound classification with reliable real-time assistive capability using a compact and low-cost
wearable hardware setup.
Model
Accuracy (%)
Precision (%)
Recall (%)
F1-Score (%)
KNN
81.7
81.0
80.5
80.7
SVM
84.2
83.9
83.5
83.6
Random Forest
88.5
88.1
87.6
87.8
Proposed CNN
93.0
92.7
92.4
92.5
Table 1: Comparison of Performance Metrics for Different Machine Learning Models
The performance of KNN, SVM, Random Forest, and CNN models was evaluated using accuracy, precision,
recall, and F1-score metrics for environmental sound classification. The KNN model achieved an accuracy of
81.7% with noticeable misclassification between acoustically similar sound classes such as alarm and baby cry.
The SVM model improved the classification performance and achieved an accuracy of 84.2% by providing better
decision boundary separation among environmental sound categories. The Random Forest model further
enhanced the prediction capability and achieved an accuracy of 88.5% with improved stability and reduced
classification errors across most sound classes. Among all the evaluated models, the proposed CNN model
demonstrated the best overall performance with an accuracy of 93.0%, precision of 92.7%, recall of 92.4%, and
F1-score of 92.5%. The normalized confusion matrices showed strong diagonal dominance for the CNN model,
indicating accurate class-wise prediction with minimal misclassification. The CNN model effectively learned
discriminative audio features from environmental sound samples, resulting in superior recognition performance
compared to traditional machine learning models. The obtained results demonstrate that deep learning-based
environmental sound classification can provide reliable performance for real-time assistive wearable
applications designed for hearing-impaired individuals.
The superior performance of CNN can be attributed to its ability to automatically learn hierarchical
temporal and spectral features from environmental sound signals. Unlike traditional machine learning
models such as KNN and SVM, CNN does not rely heavily on manually engineered features and can
effectively capture complex sound patterns. Similar observations have been reported in previous studies
on environmental sound classification, where CNN-based models demonstrated superior feature learning
and classification performance compared to conventional machine learning approaches [2], [3], [6], [8].
Minor misclassification was observed between alarm and baby cry sounds due to similarities in their
frequency distributions and temporal characteristics. Nevertheless, the CNN model maintained strong
class-wise prediction capability, as evidenced by the dominant diagonal values in the confusion matrix.
Similar challenges in distinguishing acoustically similar environmental sounds have been discussed in
previous environmental sound classification studies [3], [11], [14].
Page 2512
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
Figure 2: Confusion Matrix for different Machine Learning Models
Figure 3: Performance Comparison of Environmental Sound Classification Models
The proposed Resonix system was implemented using an ESP32-based wearable hardware setup for real-time
environmental sound alert generation. The hardware setup mainly consists of an ESP32 microcontroller,
microphone module, vibration motor, battery supply, and connecting components. The microphone module
captures surrounding environmental sounds and sends the audio input to the ESP32 for processing and
classification. Based on the classified output from the trained CNN model, the ESP32 activates the vibration
motor to generate haptic alerts for the user.
The ESP32 was selected due to its low power consumption, compact size, and efficient real-time processing
Page 2513
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
capability for wearable assistive applications. The vibration motor provides tactile feedback, enabling hearing-
impaired users to receive alerts without relying on audio signals. The overall hardware setup is lightweight,
portable, and suitable for wearable implementation
Hardware Setup and Circuit Design
The hardware implementation of the proposed Resonix system consists of an ESP32 microcontroller, three
microphone modules, two vibration motors, and an emergency push button. The microphone modules are
connected to GPIO36, GPIO39, and GPIO34 of the ESP32 to capture environmental sounds from different
directions. The vibration motors are connected to GPIO25 and GPIO26 through MOSFET driver circuits,
enabling controlled haptic feedback generation. An emergency push button is connected to GPIO27 to provide
a manual emergency alert feature. The ESP32 serves as the central processing unit, continuously monitoring
microphone inputs and controlling the vibration motors based on the detected sound events. The complete circuit
diagram of the proposed system is shown in Figure 3
Figure 4: Circuit Diagram
To enhance user safety and remote monitoring capability, the proposed system is integrated with the Blynk IoT
platform. The ESP32 is connected to a Wi-Fi network and communicates with the Blynk cloud using a unique
authentication token. Whenever the system detects a critical environmental sound such as a siren, an instant
notification is generated and delivered to the registered user's mobile device through the Blynk application.In
addition to automatic sound detection, an emergency push button is incorporated into the system. When pressed,
the ESP32 immediately triggers an emergency notification containing a predefined help message. This feature
enables users to request assistance during emergency situations. To prevent excessive alerts, a notification rate-
limiting mechanism is implemented within the firmware.
The proposed system is designed such that users can identify different environmental events through
distinct vibration patterns. Sirens, alarms and emergency events generate unique vibration sequences,
enabling intuitive interpretation without requiring visual attention. Future work will involve usability
studies with hearing-impaired participants.
Page 2514
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
Figure 5: Notification System
The notification process begins when the ESP32 receives environmental sound data from the microphone
modules. If the detected sound exceeds the predefined threshold and is classified as a siren sound, the system
sends a Blynk event notification indicating the presence of an emergency siren. Similarly, when the emergency
button is pressed, an alert message stating "HELP ME, I am in trouble!" is transmitted through the Blynk
platform. These notifications provide an additional layer of awareness and emergency communication alongside
the vibration-based haptic alerts. This dual-alert mechanism, consisting of both wearable vibration feedback and
smartphone notifications, improves the overall reliability and usability of the proposed assistive system for
hearing-impaired individuals.
System Validation
The developed prototype was tested under different environmental conditions to evaluate real-time
performance. Detection delay, vibration response time, notification delivery time, and power consumption
Page 2515
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
were measured.
Parameter
Detection Delay
Vibration Response Time
Notification Delay
Battery Life
Power Consumption
Table 2: System Validation Results of the Proposed Resonix Prototype
The developed prototype exhibited an average sound detection delay of 180 ms and a vibration response time of
120 ms. The Blynk notification system delivered alerts within an average of 2.3 seconds. The wearable prototype
provided approximately 8 hours of continuous operation and consumed an average power of 1.8 W during normal
operation.
Figure 6: Prototype
Limitations
Although the proposed system demonstrated promising results, certain limitations exist. The system
currently supports only five environmental sound classes. Similar sounds may occasionally lead to false
alarms. Performance may vary in highly noisy environments and Blynk-based notifications depend on
internet connectivity. Future work will focus on increasing the number of supported sound classes and
improving robustness under real-world conditions.
Page 2516
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
CONCLUSION
This paper presented Resonix, an AI-based wearable assistive system for environmental sound classification and
haptic alert generation for hearing-impaired individuals. Environmental sound datasets including ESC-50 and
UrbanSound8K were used for model training and evaluation [1]. Multiple machine learning models such as
KNN, SVM, Random Forest, and CNN were analyzed for environmental sound recognition. Among the
evaluated models, the proposed CNN model achieved the highest classification accuracy of 93.0% with
improved precision, recall, and F1-score performance [3], [8].
The trained CNN model was integrated with an ESP32-based wearable setup consisting of three microphone
modules, two vibration motors, and an emergency push button to generate real-time haptic alerts. The developed
system demonstrated effective environmental sound recognition with reduced misclassification among selected
sound classes. The proposed system provides a compact, low-cost, and real-time assistive solution to improve
environmental awareness for hearing-impaired users [12], [13]. Future work will focus on expanding the number
of environmental sound categories, improving performance in noisy environments, and conducting user studies
with hearing-impaired individuals to evaluate real-world usability and effectiveness.
REFERENCES
1. K. J. Piczak, “ESC: Dataset for Environmental Sound Classification,” Proceedings of ACM
Multimedia, 2015.
2. G. Park and S. Lee, “Environmental Noise Classification Using Convolutional Neural Networks,”
Sensors, vol. 20, no. 8, 2020.
3. W. Mu et al., “Environmental sound classification using temporal-frequency attention based CNN,”
Scientific Reports, 2021.
4. Y. Su et al., “Environment Sound Classification Using a Two-Stream CNN,” Sensors, 2019.
5. A. Bansal et al., “Environmental Sound Classification: A descriptive review,” Intelligent Systems with
Applications, 2022.
6. Z. Mushtaq et al., “Spectral images based environmental sound classification using CNN,” Applied
Acoustics, 2021.
7. J. Guo et al., “A Deep Attention Model for Environmental Sound Classification,” Applied Sciences,
2022.
8. R. Akter et al., A hybrid CNN-LSTM model for environmental sound classification,” Digital Signal
Processing, 2025.
9. S. Abdoli et al., “End-to-End Environmental Sound Classification using 1D CNN,” arXiv, 2019.
10. J. Sharma et al., “Environment Sound Classification using Multiple Feature Channels and Attention-
based DCNN,” arXiv, 2019.
11. B. Zhu et al., “Environmental Sound Classification Based on Multi-temporal Resolution CNN,”
arXiv, 2018.
12. D. Jain et al., “SoundWatch: Exploring Smartwatch-based Deep Learning for Sound Accessibility,”
ASSETS, 2020.
13. D. Jain et al., “Deep Learning for Sound Accessibility on Smartwatches,” Communications of the
ACM, 2022.
14. A. Ashurov et al., “Environmental Sound Classification Based on Transfer Learning,” Electronics,
2022.
15. Z. Zhang et al., “Deep CNN with Mixup for Environmental Sound Classification,” arXiv, 2018.