Page 2686
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
Gender Independence and Career Advancement of Women Employees:
The Mediating Influence of Workplace Gender Equality Policies
Rajan K
1
, Abitha K
2
, Muhammed Illyas P
3
, Sandhya Nair
4
1
Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, AMC-Allied Management College, Manisseri
2
Assistant Professor, Department of Commerce and Management, AMC-Allied Management College,
Manisseri
3
Assistant Professor, Department of English, AMC-Allied Management College, Manisseri
4
Librarian, AMC-Allied Management College, Manisseri
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150500217
Received: 21 May 2026; Accepted: 26 May 2026; Published: 16 June 2026
ABSTRACT
This study examines the relationship between Gender Independence and Career Advancement of Women
Employees, with Workplace Gender Equality Policies acting as a mediating variable. The research focuses on
women employees working across Kozhikode, Ernakulam, and Thiruvananthapuram districts of Kerala.
Following a pilot study involving 80 respondents, the final structured questionnaire generated 320 valid
responses. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was employed to examine the proposed relationships among
the study variables. The findings revealed that Gender Independence significantly influences Career
Advancement among women employees. Workplace Gender Equality Policies were also found to positively
affect career advancement and partially mediate the relationship between Gender Independence and Career
Advancement. The study highlights the importance of organizational equality policies, gender-inclusive work
environments, leadership opportunities, and institutional support systems in promoting women’s professional
growth and career development.
Keywords: Gender Independence, Career Advancement, Workplace Gender equality Policies
INTRODUCTION
As persistent gender disparities continue to shape workplace outcomes globally, the advancement of women in
organizational careers has long been a central concern in gender and management research. Although womens
participation in the labour force has grown substantially over the past decades, significant gaps remain in
leadership representation, career progression rates, and professional autonomy when compared to their male
counterparts. Research on gendered career dynamics emphasizes that it is not individual competence but
structural and cultural barriers that often limit women’s opportunities to advance into senior roles (O’Neil &
Hopkins, 2015). Central to understanding these dynamics is the concept of gender independence, which refers
to the degree to which women can exercise autonomy in career-related decisions, free from restrictive gender
norms and institutional constraints. While individual agency has been explored in some disciplinary contexts,
such as economics (Goldin, Understanding the Gender Gap, 2021), which illustrates how structural conditions
influence women’s career choices and labor market participation, the notion of gender independence in
organizational research points to both psychological self-determination and real opportunities within workplace
systems. Closely related is the concept of career advancement for women employees, which encompasses
objective indicators such as promotions, leadership appointments, and salary increases as well as subjective
experiences of professional growth and recognition. The literature consistently indicates that women encounter
slower career progress, glass ceilings, and limited access to informal networks and mentoring opportunities
compared with men (Jansen van Rensburg, 2021). Highlighting the importance of examining contextual and
policy-level influences, career advancement is shaped not only by individual capabilities but also by the
Page 2687
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
structural environment of the workplace. Workplace gender equality policies are institutional interventions
designed to create fair conditions that facilitate women’s career success. These include anti-discrimination
measures, equal pay frameworks, flexible work provisions, parental leave policies, leadership development
programs, and transparent promotion criteria. International and organizational frameworks—such as the
International Labour Organization’s normative standards and the Women’s Empowerment Principles—illustrate
how such policies aim to dismantle systemic barriers and enlarge women’s opportunities for advancement
(International Labour Organization, 2019). Empirical studies corroborate the role of supportive policies in
improving women’s retention and advancement, particularly when these policies address work-life balance and
structural bias (Singh et al, 2021). Despite the proliferation of gender equality initiatives, gaps persist between
policy intent and workplace realities. Reviews indicate that gender inequities remain embedded in organizational
practices—from biased performance evaluations to unequal access to leadership roles—suggesting that policies
must not only exist on paper but also be actively implemented and culturally embedded (Son Hing et al., Gender
inequities in the workplace: A holistic review, 2023). Collectively, these strands of research suggest that womens
gender independence, their career advancement, and the effectiveness of workplace gender equality policies are
interlinked. A nuanced examination of these relationships can illuminate how organizational environments either
enable or constrain women’s professional growth, and how targeted policies can serve as mediators in this
process.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Gender Independence (GI) and Career Advancement of Women Employees (CAWE)
Gender Independence (GI) is all about getting freedom from all societal norms and expectation. It denotes the
capacity of individuals, irrespective of gender, to exercise autonomy, make informed personal, social, and
economic choices, and participate equitably across all spheres of life, free from discrimination and restrictive
gender norms. Gender Independence is key to an inclusive workplace, giving women the same opportunities,
recognition, and resources as men (Mugesh et al., 2025). It focuses on reducing gender-based restrictions that
limit people’s access to education, jobs, political involvement, and self-expression. Studies show that when
individuals have more gender independence, countries tend to experience better development outcomes, such as
economic growth, improved health, and stronger democratic systems (Sen, 1999; World Economic Forum,
2023). Gender independence is intrinsically linked to gender equality, as it addresses entrenched structural
inequalities and power asymmetries across social, cultural, and institutional context (Kabeer, 1999). The
promotion of gender independence depends on inclusive policy frameworks, effective legal protections, and
broader transformations in societal attitudes that move beyond prescribed gender roles (United Nations
Development Programme [UNDP], 2020).
Women are increasingly participating in the workforce, yet their career growth, development and progression
remain constrained by structural and cultural challenges. According to many studies, women face an invisible
glass ceiling that restricts their movement into senior roles, even though they have the required skills and
qualifications (Ganiyu et al., 2018; Imtiaz, Shaikh, & ul Ain, 2018). Factors such as gender bias, non-
transparency in promotion practices, and insufficient mentoring support act as major difficulty to women’s
professional advancement (Sharifova, 2025). Studies show that women are still less represented in top leadership
roles, even in fields like healthcare where many women work, because gender stereotypes and family
responsibilities often limit their career growth (Mucheru et al., 2024). Studies show that leadership training, fair
promotions, and a welcoming workplace culture help women succeed in their careers (Clarke, 2011; Maigah &
Abdul Latip, 2024). Overall, these studies show that fair career growth for women needs both individual effort
and strong support from policies and organizations that promote gender equality (Ganiyu et al., 2018; Sharifova,
2025).
When women have more control over their lives and decisions, they're more likely to advance in their careers
and take on leadership roles. The studies show a strong and positive relationship between gender independence
reflected in women’s autonomy, decision-making authority, and freedom from traditional gender roles—and the
career advancement of women employees. Women who are independent tend to have more confidence, which
helps them persevere and succeed in fields where men are more common (Heilman, 2012; Bandura, 1997).
Page 2688
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
Independent women are more likely to chase leadership jobs, ask for promotions, and take advantage of career
growth chances (Eagly & Carli, 2007). Independency among women helps in breaking free from traditional
roles, go after leadership positions, and negotiate things like promotions, salary, and career growth opportunities
(Kabeer, 1999; Sen, 1990). Those women who are more independent shows more confident in their careers and
aim higher for leadership, which helps them get promotions in their career more easily (Lips, 2013). As per a
study conducted among 173 product managers and senior product managers based in the United States, it can be
seen that gender independence acts as a barrier to the advancement in career of the employees (Bone, 2024). As
per the information collected from women academic and administrative professionals in five public universities
in Ghana, it states that women labour force participation is low compared to men because of the engagement of
women in household activities (Adu-Oppong & Kendie 2017). Hence, we can reach a conclusion that gender
independence (GI) positively affects Career Advancement of Women Employees (CAWE).
H1: GI positively influences CAWE
Workplace Gender Equality Policies (WGEP) And Career Advancement of Women Employees (CAWE)
Workplace gender equality policies aim to ensure equal opportunities, pay, and career advancement for all
employees regardless of gender. It mainly measures implementing flexible working arrangements, establishing
clear anti-harassment protocols, ensuring unbiased recruitment and also providing equitable access to leadership
and developments. workplace gender quality policy is commonly defined as the human resource practice and
formal organizational rule with an aim of ensuring equal opportunities and fair treatment to every employee
regardless of gender (Kalev et al, 2006; Kulik & Olekalns, 2012). Equality and diversity policies are essential to
reduce bias and make ensure fair treatment of all employees (Buckley and MacNamara2021). There has various
legal framework for the protection of gender equality in the workplace, such as equal remuneration Act 1976,
the sexual harassment of women at workplace (prevention, prohibition and redressal) Act 2013, maternity benefit
Act 1961 and the rights of persons with disabilities Act 2016.
Women sustained upward mobility within organizational hierarchies, reflected in promotions, access to
managerial and leading roles, enhancement of skills, and continuous success are the reflection of career
advancement of women employees (Metz & Kulik, 2014; Ng & Sears, 2017). From a human capital and
institutional perspective such policies help to remove problems faced by women (Ely & Meyerson, 2000; Mc
Donald & Westphal, 2013). The impact of workplace gender equality policies is shaped by the broader
institutional, regulatory and cultural contexts (Kossek et al., 2017; Byron and post, 2016). Work family policies,
mainly including flexible scheduling and parental leave provide to support women’s career continuity and
retention (Williams et al., 2013; Chaudhuri et al; 2020). The sponsorship and mentorship policies emerge as a
major mechanism to link between gender equality initiatives and career advancement, as they provide
opportunity to access necessary promotions, career guidance etc. Studies highlight that policy rich environment
sometimes resulting in slower promotion rates and limited leadership because of the presence of deeply
embedded organizational culture, stereotypes, biased performance evaluation and expectations around ideal
worker norms etc. (Hoobler et al., 2011; Rudman et al., 2012). Proper implementation of policies is the key to
successful career advancement of women. Mere existence of gender equality policies does not lead to improved
career outcomes for women unless these are effectively implemented, monitored and supported by the top-level
management (Leslie et al., 2019; Kulik & Olekalns, 2012.
H2: WGEP positively influences CAWE
Workplace Gender Equality Policies (WGEP) and Gender Independence (GI)
Workplace gender equality policies are rules and practices that organizations implement to ensure that all
employees, regardless of their gender, have equal opportunities and treatment in the workplace. These policies
can include measures such as equal pay for equal work, parental leave for both mothers and fathers, and programs
to prevent discrimination and harassment (Kabeer, 2015). The goal of these policies is to create a fair and
inclusive work environment where everyone can thrive. Gender equality, on the other hand, refers to the state in
which individuals of all genders have equal rights, responsibilities, and opportunities. In the workplace, this
means that men and women should have the same chances for hiring, promotions, training, and pay (Cohen
Page 2689
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
Huffman, 2003). Achieving gender equality is essential not only for fairness but also for improving business
performance. Research has shown that diverse teams often lead to better decision-making and innovation (World
Economic Forum, 2021).
The relationship between workplace gender equality policies and gender equality is significant. When
organizations adopt strong gender equality policies, they can help close the gap between genders in various ways.
For instance, if a company has a clear policy on equal pay, it can help ensure that women receive the same salary
as men for doing the same job. This can motivate women to apply for jobs and seek promotions, knowing that
they will be treated fairly (Kabeer, 2015). Similarly, workplace gender equality policies can serve as a framework
for addressing issues like sexual harassment and discrimination. When employees know that their company has
strict policies against such behavior, they may feel safer and more supported at work (Cohen Huffman, 2003).
This supportive environment encourages all employees to perform at their best without fear of bias or retaliation.
However, it is important to recognize that simply having these policies in place is not enough. For them to be
effective, organizations must actively promote and enforce them. Training programs for employees and managers
about gender equality can help raise awareness and change attitudes (World Economic Forum, 2021).
Additionally, companies should regularly evaluate their policies and practices to ensure they are working as
intended. This includes collecting data on pay equity, representation of different genders in leadership roles, and
employee satisfaction. Thus, workplace gender equality policies play a crucial role in promoting gender equality.
When organizations commit to these policies and take action to implement them effectively, they can create a
more equitable workplace. This not only benefits individual employees but also enhances overall organizational
performance. As society continues to evolve, it is vital for businesses to prioritize gender equality and foster an
inclusive culture where everyone can succeed.
H3: WGEP positively influences GI
Gender Independence, Career Advancement of Women Employees and Work Place Gender Equality
Policies
Policies promoting gender equality in the workplace are essential in moderating the relationship between women
employees' career success and gender independence. The ability of women to make their own decisions, get
financial resources, and freely engage in professional and organizational settings without being constrained by
their gender is known as gender independence. Although gender independence encourages women to pursue
leadership and professional development, empirical research repeatedly shows that independence by itself does
not ensure career advancement because of ingrained organizational barriers like gender bias, discriminatory
promotion practices, occupational segregation, and the ongoing glass ceiling phenomenon (U.S. Army Research
Institute, 1993). In this regard, workplace gender equality rules serve as a crucial institutional mechanism that
mediates the relationship between career development and gender independence by converting women's
individual agency into quantifiable career outcomes. Formal organizational and legislative measures like equal
pay regulations, anti-discrimination laws, transparent recruitment and promotion procedures, maternity and
parental leave provisions, flexible work schedules, mentoring and leadership development programs, and
gender-sensitive performance appraisal systems are examples of workplace gender equality policies. By
lessening prejudice and fostering inclusive workplace cultures that value women's abilities and independence,
these measures address systemic injustices (European Institute for Gender Equality [EIGE], 2024). Research
indicates that when such policies are effectively implemented, women experience enhanced access to leadership
roles, improved job security, and increased participation in decision-making positions, thereby strengthening the
relationship between gender independence and career advancement (OECD, 2025). Furthermore, workplace
gender equality policies foster supportive environments that improve women’s job satisfaction, psychological
well-being, and organizational commitment, all of which are essential for sustained career progression (Abraham
& Rowley, 2024). Studies reveal that women working in organizations with strong gender equity frameworks
are more likely to perceive fair career growth opportunities and less likely to encounter barriers related to work–
life balance or gender stereotypes (Verma et al., 2024). This supportive policy environment amplifies womens
confidence to assert independence, negotiate career opportunities, and pursue leadership trajectories, thereby
reinforcing the mediating influence of workplace policies. From a broader organizational perspective, gender
Page 2690
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
equality policies also contribute to cultural change by challenging traditional gender norms and redefining
leadership competencies in a gender-neutral manner. Bibliometric and systematic reviews highlight that
organizations adopting gender-responsive human resource practices witness reduced gender disparities in
promotions and pay, confirming the effectiveness of policy-driven mediation (Jabeen et al., 2024). Moreover,
global policy reviews emphasize that gender equality interventions must be embedded within institutional
governance structures to ensure sustainability and long-term impact on women’s career outcomes (BMC
Medicine, 2024). In conclusion, workplace gender equality laws play a crucial role in bridging the gap between
women's career success and gender independence. These policies guarantee that women's independence is not
just symbolic but results in real professional advancement by breaking down institutional barriers, encouraging
equitable practices, and cultivating inclusive workplace cultures. Therefore, a key component of comprehending
how gender independence can successfully lead to career progression for female employees is the mediating role
of workplace gender equality policies.
H4: WGEP mediates the relationship between GI and CAWE
METHODOLOGY
Pilot Study, Data Collection and Respondent Profile
This study was conducted among women employees working in private organizations, educational institutions,
service sectors, and business establishments across Kozhikode, Ernakulam, and Thiruvananthapuram districts
of Kerala. Following a successful pilot study involving 80 respondents, the final structured questionnaire was
distributed through WhatsApp groups, Google Forms, and professional employee networks.
• Total questionnaires distributed: 380
• Responses received: 345 (Response rate: 90.8%)
• Valid responses analyzed: 320 (Validity rate: 92.8%)
Category
Sub-category
Frequency
Percentage
Age Range
21–30
102
31.9
Age Range
31–40
128
40.0
Age Range
41 and Above
90
28.1
Age Range Total
320
100.0
Employment Sector
Private Sector
146
45.6
Page 2691
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
Employment Sector
Educational
Institutions
92
28.8
Employment Sector
Service/Business
Sector
82
25.6
Employment Sector
Total
320
100.0
Work Experience
Below 5 Years
118
36.9
Work Experience
5–10 Years
124
38.8
Work Experience
Above 10 Years
78
24.3
Work Experience
Total
320
100.0
Residential Area
Urban
152
47.5
Residential Area
Semi-Urban
98
30.6
Residential Area
Rural
70
21.9
Overall Total
320
100.0
Measures
The study examined the relationship between Gender Independence (GI) and Career Advancement (CA), with
Workplace Gender Equality Policies (WGEP) acting as a mediating variable.
Gender Independence (GI): Adapted 6-item scale measuring decision-making freedom, professional autonomy,
workplace confidence, and independent participation in organizational activities. Cronbach’s Alpha: 0.882
• Career Advancement (CA): Adapted 6-item scale measuring promotion opportunities, leadership participation,
professional growth, salary progression, and career satisfaction among women employees. Cronbach’s Alpha:
0.869
Workplace Gender Equality Policies (WGEP): Adapted 6-item scale measuring organizational equality
policies, anti-discrimination measures, equal opportunity practices, maternity support, and inclusive workplace
culture. Cronbach’s Alpha: 0.891
Data Analysis and Statistical Results
The final valid sample of 320 respondents was analyzed using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM). Prior to
hypothesis testing, the data were assessed for normality, reliability, convergent validity, discriminant validity,
and model fit.
Normality Test with Skewness and Kurtosis
Skewness and kurtosis values within ±2 indicate acceptable normality for SEM analysis. All constructs satisfied
the recommended thresholds.
Construct
Skewness
Kurtosis
Interpretation
Gender
Independence (GI)
-0.648
0.924
Acceptable
normality
Page 2692
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
Career
Advancement (CA)
-0.571
0.838
Acceptable
normality
Workplace Gender
Equality Policies
(WGEP)
-0.602
0.996
Acceptable
normality
Reliability and Convergent Validity
Reliability and convergent validity were assessed using Cronbach’s Alpha, Composite Reliability (CR), and
Average Variance Extracted (AVE).
Construct
Cronbach’s
Alpha
CR
AVE
Result
Gender
Independence
(GI)
0.882
0.911
0.631
Accepted
Career
Advancement
(CA)
0.869
0.897
0.594
Accepted
Workplace
Gender
Equality
Policies
(WGEP)
0.891
0.922
0.664
Accepted
Discriminant Validity (Fornell-Larcker Criterion)
The square root of AVE values exceeded inter-construct correlations, confirming discriminant validity.
Construct
GI
CA
WGEP
Gender
Independence (GI)
0.794
Career
Advancement (CA)
0.562
0.771
Workplace Gender
Equality Policies
(WGEP)
0.628
0.518
0.815
Model Fit Indices
The model fit indices confirmed that the proposed mediation model adequately represented the observed data.
Fit Index
Obtained Value
Recommended
Value
Interpretation
SRMR
0.057
< 0.08
Good fit
NFI
0.923
> 0.90
Acceptable fit
CFI
0.949
> 0.90
Good fit
RMSEA
0.045
< 0.08
Good fit
Chi-square/df
2.186
< 3.00
Acceptable fit
Page 2693
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
Hypothesis Test Results
The hypothesis testing results revealed significant relationships among the study variables.
Hypothesis
Relationship
Beta
t-value
p-value
Result
H1
GI -> CA
0.486
9.214
< 0.001
Supported
H2
GI ->
WGEP
0.552
10.638
< 0.001
Supported
H3
WGEP ->
CA
0.318
6.482
< 0.001
Supported
H4
GI ->
WGEP ->
CA
0.176
4.362
< 0.001
Mediation
supported
FINDINGS
The findings revealed that Gender Independence significantly influences Career Advancement among women
employees. Women employees with greater professional autonomy, workplace confidence, and independent
decision-making ability demonstrated stronger career progression and leadership participation. Workplace
Gender Equality Policies also significantly enhanced career advancement and partially mediated the relationship
between Gender Independence and Career Advancement. The statistical analysis confirmed satisfactory
reliability, validity, and model fit, supporting the robustness of the proposed research model.
Limitations of the Study
The study was limited to women employees working in Kozhikode, Ernakulam, and Thiruvananthapuram
districts of Kerala; therefore, the findings may not be fully generalizable to women employees in other
regions or countries.
The study adopted a cross-sectional research design, which captures responses only at a single point in
time and limits the ability to examine long-term changes in career advancement and workplace equality
practices.
The data were collected using self-reported questionnaires, which may be influenced by personal bias,
social desirability bias, or subjective perceptions of workplace experiences.
The study focused only on Gender Independence, Career Advancement, and Workplace Gender Equality
Policies. Other important factors such as organizational culture, leadership style, family responsibilities,
work-life balance, and socio-economic conditions were not included in the model.
The sample size was restricted to 320 valid respondents, which may limit broader statistical
generalization across different employment sectors and organizational settings.
Future Research Suggestions
Future studies may expand the geographical scope by including respondents from additional states,
countries, or multinational organizations to improve generalizability.
Researchers may adopt longitudinal research designs to examine the long-term impact of gender
independence and workplace equality policies on women’s career growth and organizational outcomes.
Page 2694
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
Future studies can include additional mediating or moderating variables such as organizational support,
leadership style, work-life balance, job satisfaction, employee motivation, and psychological
empowerment.
Comparative studies between public and private sector organizations or between male and female
employees may provide deeper insights into workplace gender dynamics and career advancement
opportunities.
Future research may employ mixed-method approaches incorporating interviews, focus group
discussions, and qualitative analysis to obtain richer and more comprehensive insights into women
employeesworkplace experiences.
CONCLUSION
The study concludes that Gender Independence and Workplace Gender Equality Policies play a significant role
in promoting Career Advancement among women employees. Organizations should strengthen equality policies,
leadership opportunities, anti-discrimination measures, and inclusive work environments to support women’s
professional development. The findings provide practical implications for organizational leaders, policymakers,
and human resource managers in creating gender-inclusive workplaces that encourage women’s empowerment
and long-term career growth.
REFERENCES
1. Abraham, R. V., & Rowley, T. Q. (2024). Impact of gender equality policies on women’s career mental
health and well-being. Studies in Social Science & Humanities.
https://www.paradigmpress.org/SSSH/article/view/1247
2. Adu-Oppong, A. A. & Kendie, S. B. (2017). Gender and Career Advancement in the Workplace: An
Assessment of the Experiences of Women in Higher Education Management. International Journal of
Humanities and Social Science, 7(10), 117-128.
https://ijhss.thebrpi.org/journals/Vol_7_No_10_October_2017/9.pdf
3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co.
https://www.academia.edu/28274869/Albert_Bandura_Self_Efficacy_The_Exercise_of_Control_W_H_
Freeman_and_Co_1997_pdf
4. Bone, B. C. (2024). The Relationship Between Gender and Career Advancement in Product Management.
Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies, Walden University (P. 01-163).
https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=17585&context=dissertations
5. Byron, K., & Post, C. (2016). Women on boards of directors and corporate social performance. Academy
of Management Journal, 59(5), 1546–1571. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0293
6. Chaudhuri, S., Morash, E. A., & Srivastava, A. (2020). Work–life balance policies and gender equity.
Human Resource Management Journal, 30(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12265
7. Clarke, M. (2011). Advancing women's careers through leadership development programs. Employee
Relations, 33(5), 498–515. https://doi.org/10.1108/01425451111153871
8. Cohen, P. N., Huffman, M. L. (2003). Individuals' Attitudes Toward Gender Inequality: The Role of Gender
and Work Experience. Sociological Perspectives, 46(4), 457-478.
9. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-
determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
10. Dr. Mugesh, P., Jishna, V. R., Divya, C., & Lalitha, A. (2025). Exploring the Meditating Role of Gender
Equality in the link between Strong Institution and Mental Peace: A Study among Private Sector Working
Women in Kerala. International Journal of Food and Nutritional Sciences, 14(5), 86-95.
https://www.ijfans.org/uploads/paper/04b4dad235ac37ba5ebd714a178b4133.pdf
11. Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders.
Harvard Business School Press.
Page 2695
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
12. Ely, R. J., & Meyerson, D. E. (2000). Theories of gender in organizations. Organization Studies, 21(4),
589–620. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840600214002
13. European Institute for Gender Equality. (2024). Gender equality in recruitment and career progression.
Publications Office of the European Union.
https://eige.europa.eu/gender-mainstreaming/toolkits/gear/gender-equality-recruitment-and-career-
progression
14. Ganiyu, R. A., Oluwafemi, A. O., & Ademola, A. A. (2018). The glass ceiling conundrum: Illusory belief
or barriers that impede women’s career advancement in the workplace. Journal of Evolutionary Studies in
Business, 3(1), 137-166. https://doi.org/10.1344/jesb2018.1.j040
15. Goldin, C. (2021). Understanding the Gender Gap: An Economic History of American Women. (Also:
related concepts on women’s labor participation). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0147547900011510
16. Heilman, M. E. (2012). Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32,
113–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.003
17. Hoobler, J. M., Lemmon, G., & Wayne, S. J. (2011). Women’s underrepresentation in upper management.
Journal of Management, 37(3), 703–726. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309350089
18. Imtiaz, R., Shaikh, S., & ul Ain, S. Q. (2018). Glass ceiling effect on women career progression in urban
Pakistan. Journal of Business Strategies, 12(2), 17–42. 10.29270/JBS.12.2(2018).088
19. International Labour Organization (2019). Empowering Women at Work: Company Policies and Practices
for Gender Equality. ILO publication (framework on workplace policy design). ISBN: 9789220330678
(Print), 9789220330661 (Web PDF), Geneva, 2020
20. Jabeen, G., Goli, G., Kafila, K., & others. (2024). A bibliometric review on gender equity in human
resource management. Future Business Journal, 10(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-024-00381-x
21. Jansen van Rensburg, S. K. (2021). Doing gender well: Women’s perceptions on gender equality and career
progression in the South African security industry. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology.
https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v47i0.1815
22. Kabeer, N. (2015). Gender Equality, Economic Growth, and Women's Agency: The "Endless" Story?
Journal of International Development, 27(8), 1329-1341.
23. Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s
empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3), 435–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00125
24. Kalev, A., Dobbin, F., & Kelly, E. (2006). Best practices or best guesses? American Sociological Review,
71(4), 589–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100507
25. Kossek, E. E., Su, R., & Wu, L. (2017). “Opting outor “pushed out”? Journal of Management, 43(1),
228–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315594843
26. Kulik, C. T., & Olekalns, M. (2012). Negotiating the gender divide. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1387–
1415. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311435107
27. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and
academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79-122.
https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
28. Leslie, L. M., Manchester, C. F., Park, T. Y., & Mehng, S. A. (2019). Flexible work practices. Academy of
Management Journal, 55(6), 1405–1427. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0654
29. Lips, H. M. (2013). Gender: The basics. Routledge. https://xyonline.net/sites/xyonline.net/files/2019-
08/Lips%2C%20Gender%20-%20The%20Basics%20%282013%29.pdf
30. Maigah, A., & Abdul Latip, H. (2024). Women career development: A study on enablers and barriers to
senior leadership positions. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 30(4), 7738–7747.
https://kuey.net/index.php/kuey/article/view/2636/1606
31. McDonald, M. L., & Westphal, J. D. (2013). Access denied. Academy of Management Journal, 56(5),
1169–1198. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0098
32. Metz, I., & Kulik, C. T. (2014). Women in leadership. Human Resource Management, 53(3), 437–455.
https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21575
33. Mucheru, D., McAuliffe, E., Kesale, A. et al. (2024). A rapid realist review on leadership and career
advancement interventions for women in healthcare. BMC Health Serv Res, 24(856), 01-13.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11348-7
Page 2696
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
34. O’Neil, D. A., & Hopkins, M. M. (2015). The impact of gendered organizational systems on womens
career advancement. Frontiers in Psychology. DOI:10.338 fpsy.g.2025.00905
35. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2025). Gender equality at work. OECD
Publishing.
https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/gender-equality-at-work_6cda329d-en.html
36. Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E., & Nauts, S. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash.
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.008
37. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
https://kuangaliablog.wordpress.com/wp-
content/uploads/2017/07/amartya_kumar_sen_development_as_freedombookfi.pdf
38. Sen, A. (1990). Gender and cooperative conflicts. In I. Tinker (Ed.), Persistent inequalities (pp. 123–149).
Oxford University Press. https://www.wider.unu.edu/sites/default/files/WP18.pdf
39. Sharifova, M. (2025). Barriers to women’s career advancement. Green Economy and Development, 3(7).
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16668824
40. Singh, P., Saharan, T., & Bhat, M. Y. (2022). Do workplace issues influence women’s career progression?
Research in Transportation Business & Management, 44, Article 100682.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100682
41. Son Hing, L. S., Sakr, N., Sorenson, J. B., & others. (2023). Gender inequities in the workplace: A holistic
review of organizational processes and practices. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2023.100968
42. United Nations Development Programme. (2020). Human development report 2020: The next frontier—
Human development and the Anthropocene. UNDP. https://hdr.undp.org/content/human-development-
report-2020
43. U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. (1993). Glass ceiling effects and
barriers to women’s advancement.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass_ceiling.
44. Verma, A., Chawla, C., Sethi, S., Joseph, C., Gupta, N., & Raj, R. (2024). Gender equality in the
workplace. Journal of Informatics Education and Research.
https://jier.org/index.php/journal/article/view/939
45. Williams, J. C., Blair-Loy, M., & Berdahl, J. L. (2013). Cultural schemas and flexibility stigma. Journal of
Social Issues, 69(2), 209–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12015
46. World Economic Forum. (2021). Global Gender Gap Report 2021. Retrieved from
https://www.weforum.org/reports/global-gender-gap-report-2021
47. World Economic Forum. (2023). Global gender gap report 2023. World Economic Forum.
https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2023.pdf
48. World Health Organization. (2024). Interventions on gender equity in the workplace: A scoping review.
BMC Medicine, 22, Article 149.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03346-7