Page 2770
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
The impact of Generative AI on the Efficiency and accuracy of drug
discovery
Harsha Rajurkar
Department of Computer Science and Engineering M.S. Bidve Engineering College, Latur.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150500225
Received: 21 May 2026; Accepted: 26 May 2026; Published: 18 June 2026
ABSTRACT
Drug discovery traditionally is a long and expensive process. It requires huge financial investment and can
possibly take more than a decade to develop a single drug. In this paper, It has been explored how generative AI
is changing this process. By using advanced models, generative AI can design new drug molecules, predict their
properties, improve efficiency by reducing both time and cost required for research to get precise and accurate
data. These models can generate drug candidates with better binding affinity and drug like properties, making
the selection process more reliable. It is also being used across different stages of drug discovery, from
identifying targets to monitoring drug safety. Although generative AI has great potential to transform drug
discovery by making it faster, more efficient and accurate, there are still some challenges like the need for high
quality data, lack of model transparency, regulatory concerns and more real world testing and comparison. These
improvements are still needed for its full adoption.
Keywords: Generative AI, Drug Discovery, Molecular Design, Time Optimization, Cost Reduction, Predictive
Modeling.
INTRODUCTION
Drug discovery is a complex and resource-intensive process that traditionally takes over a decade and can cost
up to $1 billion for a single new drug. The process involves several stages, including target identification, hit
discovery, lead optimization, and clinical development, each of which presents significant scientific and
logistical challenges.
Traditionally, drug discovery has relied on methods such as high-throughput screening, iterative medicinal
chemistry, and extensive experimental validation. While these approaches are effective, they are often time-
consuming and limited in their ability to explore the vast chemical space or accurately predict complex biological
interactions.
In recent years, generative AI has emerged as a transformative technology in this field. By leveraging advanced
computational models, particularly deep learning and diffusion-based techniques, generative AI can design and
optimize novel molecular structures more efficiently. It enables researchers to automate molecular generation,
improve drug-like properties, and integrate diverse biological data for better decision-making. As a result,
generative AI holds great potential to accelerate drug discovery, enhance candidate selection accuracy, and
significantly reduce overall costs.
Key Findings
A. Efficiency: speed and cost reduction
Generative AI models have demonstrated impressive results in the speed and resource efficiency of drug
discovery compared to traditional methods. For example, the IDOLpro generative chemistry AI platform was
found to be over 100 times faster and less expensive than exhaustive virtual screening (Kadan et al., 2025).
Similarly, the application of denoising diffusion probabilistic models (DDPMs) to molecular dynamics (MD)
Page 2771
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
simulations reduced computational costs to one third of traditional umbrella sampling approaches, making high-
throughput screening feasible for membrane partitioning studies (Obi et al., 2024).
B. Accuracy: Better Candidate Selection
Generative AI does not just save time, it also produces better candidates. IDOLpro generated ligands with
binding affinities 1020% higher than the next best method, and remarkably, it was the first approach to generate
molecules that outperformed experimentally observed ligands in benchmark binding assays (Kadan et al., 2025).
The DDPM models also showed strong accuracy, correctly predicting membrane interaction parameters and
ligand orientations for a range of FDA approved drugs (Obi et al., 2024).
In a more disease-specific application, the CRISPR-TICA.ai pipeline combined functional genomics data with
generative AI to prioritize drug candidates targeting key residues in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). This kind
of approach shows how generative AI can be tailored for specific biological contexts, potentially enabling more
rational and targeted drug design (Vora et al., 2025).
It is worth noting, that different studies use different metrics to evaluate success binding affinity, quantitative
estimate of drug likeness (QED), synthetic accessibility making it difficult to do detailed comparisons as the
lack of universal validation standards remains a clear gap in the field.
C. Challenges and Limitations
Despite the promising results, there are real challenges that need to be addressed before generative AI can be
fully trusted in drug discovery settings. Data quality is a big concern, if the training data is biased or incomplete,
the models can produce misleading results (Abbas et al., 2024). Model interpretability is another issue: many
generative AI models are essentially black boxes, which is a problem when regulators and clinicians need to
understand why a particular candidate was selected (Abbas et al., 2024) ( Bordukova et al., 2023).
Scalability and generalizability are also open questions. Most studies have demonstrated results for specific
targets or disease areas, and it is not always clear how well these approaches would transfer to other contexts.
The field also lacks the kind of systematic, benchmarking studies that would make it easier to compare different
generative AI approaches against each other and against traditional methods (Zhang et al., 2024) ( Lai et al.,
2025).
Finally, there are regulatory and ethical considerations to keep in mind. As generative AI becomes more
embedded in drug development, frameworks are needed to ensure that these tools are used safely with
responsibility especially as they start influencing decisions that directly affect patient outcomes (Vanier et al.,
2023).
Summary of Key Findings
Efficiency: Generative AI models such as IDOLpro and DDPMs have demonstrated dramatic
improvements in the speed and cost-effectiveness of early-stage drug discovery, with reported gains of
up to 100-fold in speed and threefold reductions in computational cost compared to traditional methods
(Kadan et al., 2025)(Obi et al., 2024).
Accuracy: These models also enhance predictive accuracy, generating candidates with superior binding
affinities and drug-like properties, and improving the reliability of membrane partitioning and safety
assessments
(Kadan et al., 2025)(Obi et al., 2024)(Mishra & Gupta, 2025).
Workflow Integration: Generative AI is being integrated into multiple stages of the drug discovery
pipeline, from hit identification and lead optimization to pharmacovigilance, supporting multi-objective
optimization and data-driven decision-making
(Kadan et al., 2025)(Vora et al., 2025)(Mishra & Gupta,
2025).
Page 2772
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
Challenges: Persistent challenges include data quality, model interpretability, regulatory compliance,
and the need for more systematic benchmarking and real-world validation
(Abbas et al.,
2024)(Bordukova et al., 2023)
.
Gaps and Areas for Further Research
Quantitative Benchmarking: More systematic, quantitative comparisons between generative AI and
traditional approaches are needed across all stages of drug discovery.
Model Interpretability: Improved transparency and explain ability are essential for regulatory
acceptance and broader adoption.
Integration with Experimental Workflows: Deeper integration and validation in real-world settings
will be critical to demonstrate practical utility.
Ethical and Regulatory Frameworks: As generative AI becomes more pervasive, robust frameworks are
needed to ensure safety, efficacy, and compliance
TABLE 1: generative AI impact across drug discovery stages
Stage
Efficiency Gains (AI vs.
Traditional)
Accuracy
Improvements
Integration
Level
Notable
Evidence
Source(s)
Hit Identification
>100× faster, less
expensive
(Kadan et al., 2025)
Higher binding
affinity
(Kadan et al., 2025)
High
(Kadan et
al., 2025)
Membrane
Partitioning
reduction in
computational cost
(Obi et al., 2024)
Accurate PMF
profiles
(Obi et al., 2024)
Moderate
(Obi et al.,
2024)
Lead Optimization
Not quantified
(Zhang et al., 2024)
Not quantified
Moderate
(Zhang et
al., 2024)
Clinical
Trials/Digital Twins
Potential efficiency gains
(Bordukova et al., 2023)
Not quantified
Low
(Bordukova
et al., 2023)
Table 2: comparative performance metrics
Metric/Outcome
Traditional
Approach (Best
Reported)
Relative
Improvement
Source
Ligand Binding Affinity
SOTA virtual
screening
1020% higher
(Kadan et
al., 2025)
Computational Cost
(Membrane Partitioning)
Full umbrella
sampling
3× reduction
(Obi et al.,
2024)
Page 2773
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
Speed (Ligand
Generation)
Exhaustive virtual
screening
>100× faster
(Kadan et
al., 2025)
Synthetic Accessibility
Traditional
methods
Improved
(Kadan et
al., 2025)
DISCUSSION
Taken together, the evidence strongly suggests that generative AI is bringing meaningful changes to drug
discovery, particularly in the early stages such as molecular design and candidate prioritization. Its ability to
rapidly generate and evaluate novel compounds, while simultaneously optimizing multiple properties offers a
clear advantage over traditional methods and opens up new possibilities for innovation.
Another important aspect is the versatility of generative AI. Beyond discovering new molecules, it is increasingly
being used to model membrane interactions, predict adverse drug reactions, and simulate clinical trials. This
wide range of applications indicates that generative AI has the potential to evolve into a core technology
supporting the entire drug development pipeline, rather than remaining limited to specific tasks.
However, the field is still in its early stages. Many current studies are early implementations, and there is a strong
need for validation in real world settings. The lack of standardized benchmarks also makes it difficult to
accurately assess how well these models perform outside controlled environments. While these limitations do
not undermine the promise of generative AI, they highlight the importance of cautious and realistic expectations.
Future Scope
Looking ahead, future research should focus on systematic comparisons between generative AI and traditional
approaches across all stages of drug discovery. Improving model transparency will be essential for building trust
among regulators and clinicians. Additionally, deeper integration with experimental workflows and the
development of robust ethical and regulatory frameworks will be critical for long term success.
In conclusion, generative AI is not a complete replacement for existing methods, but it represents a powerful
and transformative advancement in drug discovery. With continued improvement, validation, and responsible
implementation, it has the potential to make drug development faster, more cost-effective, and more accurate
ultimately benefiting patients worldwide.
REFERENCES
1. Kadan, A., Ryczko, K., Lloyd, E., Roitberg, A., & Yamazaki, T. (2025). Guided multi-objective generative
AI to enhance structure-based drug design. In Chemical Science (Vol. 16, Issue 29, pp. 1319613210).
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC). https://doi.org/10.1039/d5sc01778e
2. Obi, P., Gc, J. B., Mariasoosai, C., Diyaolu, A., & Natesan, S. (2024). Application of Generative Artificial
Intelligence in Predicting Membrane Partitioning of Drugs: Combining Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic
Models and MD Simulations Reduces the Computational Cost to One-Third. In Journal of Chemical
Theory and Computation (Vol. 20, Issue 14, pp. 58665881). American Chemical Society (ACS).
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00315
3. Zhang, O., Lin, H., Zhang, H., Zhao, H., Huang, Y., Huang, Y., Jiang, D., Hsieh, C., Pan, P., & Hou, T.
(2024). Deep Lead Optimization: Leveraging Generative AI for Structural Modification. Journal of the
American Chemical Society.
4. Lai, L., Liu, Y., Song, B., Li, K., & Zeng, X. (2025). Deep Generative Models for Therapeutic Peptide
Discovery: A Comprehensive Review. In ACM Computing Surveys (Vol. 57, Issue 6, pp. 129).
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). https://doi.org/10.1145/3714455
5. Vora, D., Chan, A., Pangeni Pokharel, S., Liu, Q., Chen, R., Chen, B., Chen, A., Yang, L., & Chen, C.-W.
(2025). CRISPR-tica.ai: A function-informed generative modeling pipeline for prioritizing drug discovery
Page 2774
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
in AML. In Blood (Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1, pp. 277277). American Society of Hematology.
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2025-277
6. Bordukova, M., Makarov, N., Rodriguez-Esteban, R., Schmich, F., & Menden, M. P. (2023). Generative
artificial intelligence empowers digital twins in drug discovery and clinical trials. In Expert Opinion on
Drug Discovery (Vol. 19, Issue 1, pp. 3342). Informa UK Limited.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17460441.2023.2273839
7. Vanier, A., Fernandez, J., Kelley, S., Alter, L., Semenzato, P., Alberti, C., Chevret, S., Costagliola, D.,
Cucherat, M., Falissard, B., Gueyffier, F., Lambert, J., Lengliné, E., Locher, C., Naudet, F., Porcher, R.,
Thiébaut, R., Vray, M., Zohar, S., Le Guludec, D. (2023). Rapid access to innovative medicinal
products while ensuring relevant health technology assessment. Position of the French National Authority
for Health. In BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine (Vol. 29, Issue 1, pp. 15). BMJ.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112091
8. Mishra, H. P., & Gupta, R. (2025). Leveraging Generative AI for Drug Safety and Pharmacovigilance. In
Current Reviews in Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology (Vol. 20, Issue 2, pp. 8997). Bentham
Science Publishers Ltd. https://doi.org/10.2174/0127724328311400240823062829
9. Abbas, M. K. G., Rassam, A., Karamshahi, F., Abunora, R., & Abouseada, M. (2024). The Role of AI in
Drug Discovery. In ChemBioChem (Vol. 25, Issue 14). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.202300816