Page 2890
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
Bio-Cultural Regenerative Food and Beverages System among the Indige-
nous Communities in Assam Vis-à-vis South-East Asian Nations
Prof. Arup Barman
1
,
Deep Jyoti Deuri
2
, Bhargabi Hazarika
3
1
Professor, Dept of Business Administration, Assam University, Silchar(India)
2
Research Scholar, Dept of Social Work, Assam University, Silchar
3
Research Scholar, Dept of Business Administration, Assam University, Silchar (India)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150500236
Received: 25 May 2026; Accepted: 30 May 2026; Published: 19 June 2026
ABSTRACT
This study investigates the bio-cultural regenerative food and beverage systems of indigenous communities in
Assam, comparing them with those of Southeast Asian nations, utilising a secondary, evidence-based meta-syn-
thesis framework. By integrating ethnobotanical, microbiological, and socio-ecological datasets, the research
analyses traditional fermentation systems, including Xaj-pani, Jou, Judima, Apong, Tapai, Tapuy, and Look-
pang, as dynamic regenerative models rooted in local ecological knowledge systems. The results indicate sub-
stantial evolutionary convergence across the Assam–Southeast Asia bio-cultural corridor, particularly in the
prevalence of functional microbial phyla, such as Firmicutes, and in the incorporation of wild edible plants into
fermentation starter cultures. These systems enhance food security, microbial diversity, nutraceutical health, and
community resilience, while maintaining local agrobiodiversity through low-energy traditional biotechnology.
Nevertheless, rapid marketisation, monocultural agriculture, environmental change, and the decline of Tradi-
tional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) pose significant threats to their persistence. The study contends that indig-
enous fermentation systems constitute decentralised, regenerative sustainability models with considerable rele-
vance for post-2030 ecological restoration, food sovereignty, and community-driven bioeconomy.
Keywords: Bio-cultural regeneration, Indigenous fermentation, Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK), Re-
generative sustainability, Ethnobotany, Microbial diversity, Food sovereignty, Traditional biotechnology
INTRODUCTION
Tribal food worldwide represents a sophisticated bio-cultural knowledge system in which food, beverages, med-
icines, ecology, and community health are deeply interlinked (Kuhnlein & Receveur, 1996; Toledo & Burlin-
game, 2006; Barman, 2011). Within the geographical outlines of Northeast India, Assam serves as a crucial
epicentre for this biocultural continuum. The Brahmaputra and Barak river basins, combined with the surround-
ing terrain, provide a distinct, rich tapestry of ethnic groups, including the Deoris, Bodos, Mising, Dimasas,
Karbis and Rabhas. Each tribal community possesses highly evolved traditional ecological knowledge
(Bhattacharya & Deka, 2023; Das et al., 2016).
The neighbouring Southeast Asian region is part of a contiguous biocultural corridor characterised by extraordi-
nary ethnic, linguistic and biological diversity (Barman, 2012; Bhattacharya & Deka, 2023; Das et al., 2016).
Historically connected through migratory paths, shared geoclimatic conditions, and trade networks, these regions
are hotspots of agrobiodiversity and ancient ethno-dietary practices (Bhattacharya & Deka, 2023; Ray, 2025).
Furthermore, traditional resource management strategies such as the rotational shifting or fallow-based cultiva-
tion systems in the highlands, alongside integrated fish-rice agricultural systems in the floodplains, parallel prac-
tices found throughout both South and Southeast Asia (Gonsalves, 2025; Goodridge, 2025).
Page 2891
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
The term “regenerativehere refers to the restoration and maintenance of human psychological health, microbial
diversity, ecological balance, and environmental sustainability. The indigenous food system is grounded in pro-
found ecological knowledge and embodies holistic models in which land, water, humans, and spiritual rituals
are inextricably intertwined (Goodridge, 2025; Sangha, 2026). However, these systems also operate on active
biocultural regeneration, balancing food production with the structural maintenance of ecosystem services
(Gonsalves, 2025; Sangha, 2026).
Agriculture and natural resource extraction in these communities operate as deeply integrated social institutions
rather than purely economic activities; this is exemplified by adaptive practices such as flood-resilient paddy
cultivation, rotational forest fallows, and seasonal community-led resource harvesting in local floodplain wet-
lands (beels) (Das et al., 2016). Central to this localised adaptive framework is the widespread practice of tradi-
tional biotechnology, particularly the production of rice-based fermented beverages like Xaj-pani, Jou, Judima,
and Nogin, Sujen and Apong, which are prepared using complex starter cakes infused with a vast array of wild
edible plants (WEPs) (Bhattacharya & Deka, 2023; Yumnam et al., 2024). These botanically enriched beverage
systems provide critical household food security, deliver distinct probiotic and nutraceutical benefits, and fortify
community cohesion during major socio-religious festivals (Bhattacharya & Deka, 2023; Yumnam et al., 2024).
By addressing these limitations, this study aims to examine the bio-cultural regenerative food and beverage
systems among indigenous communities in Assam, vis-à-vis those in Southeast Asian nations, to map their shared
functional properties and resource management mechanisms.
By linking micro-level traditional ecological assets to macro-level sustainability needs, this research provides an
empirical framework to guide policy and intervention strategies for food sovereignty and biocultural preservation
from 2030 onwards.
Statement of the problem
Despite ecological resilience and socio-cultural values, the indigenous biocultural food and beverage system
faces an unprecedented crisis of genetic erosion, cultural marginalisation and disruption (Jaggi et al., 2024; Ray,
2025). The centralised market structure and agrochemical-dependent monocultures dominate the modern glob-
alised food chain. They have systematically undermined the local ecological knowledge across the Northeast
and Southeast Asian countries (Bhattacharya & Deka, 2023; Gonsalves, 2025).
The fluctuating riverine dynamics and top-down agricultural transitions threaten the seasonal resources on which
indigenous resource management in Assam is based, displacing native crops and traditional land practices (Das
et al., 2016). Furthermore, formulating traditional fermented cakes requires complex ethnobotanical knowledge,
as in Xaj-pani, Jou, Judima, Sujen, and Apong, which is rapidly declining among younger generations due to
demographic shifts and rapid rural-urban migration (Yumnam et al., 2024).
Looking at global environmental governance after 2030, biocultural vulnerability stands out as a major concern.
As the world reaches the 2030 deadline for the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), both
international policy and sustainability science show that traditional approaches to 'sustainable mitigation'—
which focus on reducing harm or maintaining a weakened status quo—are not enough to address the growing
climate shocks and ecosystem collapses expected by mid-century (Abrahams, 2026; Edgar-Webkamigad, 2026).
Contemporary sustainability discourse increasingly advocates for both conceptual and practical shifts toward
regenerative sustainability in the post-2030 era (Abrahams, 2026; Toner et al., 2023). Rather than focusing ex-
clusively on minimising environmental damage, this paradigm emphasises the active restoration and renewal of
ecological systems. It promotes resource management strategies that leverage localised ecological relationships
to rebuild soil health, enhance biodiversity, restore functional microbiomes, and establish resilient, self-sustain-
ing cycles of interaction between human communities and their environments (Abrahams, 2026; Arp, 2026;
Toner et al., 2023).
Indigenous food and beverage systems reflect many key ideas of regenerative sustainability. They are based on
deep ecological knowledge, community stewardship, and flexible relationships with local environments. How-
ever, these systems are still not widely used or fully recognised in most agricultural, economic, and sustainability
Page 2892
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
policies (Edgar-Webkamigad, 2026). Most research to date has focused on describing the plants used in tradi-
tional foods (Das et al., 2016) and on studying the microbes involved in ethnic fermentation (Yumnam et al.,
2024). Still, there is a major gap in research connecting these local indigenous practices to the broader goals of
regenerative sustainability beyond 2030.
Many current climate adaptation and sustainability policies do not account for the institutions, spiritual beliefs,
and food traditions that shape indigenous food systems in places like Assam and Southeast Asia (Edgar-Web-
kamigad, 2026). Often, food production is viewed separately from cultural traditions, community strength, and
microbiome health, which limits a more complete understanding of sustainability.
If we do not have a clear way to compare the different types of value in these systems, such as natural, human,
social, and microbial capital, we will not fully understand the wider regenerative potential of indigenous prac-
tices. As a result, their usefulness as flexible models for sustainability beyond 2030 may continue to be over-
looked, potentially leaving indigenous communities more vulnerable to cultural loss, environmental problems,
and future climate risks.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
This review focuses mainly on three areas related to this study. First, it identifies regenerative food and beverage
practices native to Southeast Asia. Next, it explores the biochemical and ecological principles that support their
sustainability in Assam. Finally, it points out gaps in current research that this study will address.
Identification of regenerative food and beverages in Southeast Asia
The traditional food and beverage system represents a highly evolved adaptation to Southeast Asia's geoclimatic
conditions, specifically designed to balance resource fluctuations and sustain the environment (Holzapfel, 2000;
Owens et al., 2014). The existing literature indicates that carbohydrates and legume-based fermentation form the
foundation of indigenous diets in Thailand, Vietnam, Indonesia, Cambodia, and the Philippines (Gandjar, 2003;
Surya, 2024). Research identifies complex solid-substrate fungal and lactic acid-based bacterial fermentations,
including Indonesian ‘Tempe’, Malaysian ‘Tapei and Philippine ‘Tapuy’ (Dung et al., 2007; Kozaki & Uchi-
mura, 1990). These are considered ‘regenerativeas they optimise locally harvested, climate-resilient raw mate-
rials (cassava landraces, glutinous rice varieties, and wild palm saps) via non-extractive, cottage-scale technol-
ogies that preserve localised biochemical and cultural structures (Surya, 2024). Furthermore, microbial profiling
of these indigenous systems supports distinct consortia of functional microflora that mitigate food spoilage under
ambient tropical conditions without requiring energy-intensive cold chains (Holzapfel, 2000).
The Regenerative Components of Food and Beverages in Assam
In Northeast India, indigenous communities use traditional food and beverage practices as holistic health systems
closely tied to the local environment (Das et al., 2016). Studies on groups such as the Deoris, Bodos, Mising,
Dimasas, Karbis, and Rabhas show that their food systems extend beyond basic nutrition and support biocultural
regeneration (Das et al., 2025; Yumnam et al., 2024). These regenerative qualities stem from traditional biotech-
nology, particularly the use of complex fermentation starter cakes such as Mod Pitha, Humao, Amao, Bakhor,
and Apop Pitha (Das et al., 2024; Deka et al., 2016).
Biochemical studies show that these starter systems produce low-alcohol, nutrient-rich drinks like Xaj-pani, Jou,
Judima, Nogin, Sujen, and Apong. These drinks are high in calories and antioxidants and offer gastroprotective
benefits (Tonchaiyaphum et al., 2024). They help maintain community health by providing energy during de-
manding farm work and by strengthening social ties during regular religious festivals (Bhattacharya & Deka,
2023).
Page 2893
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
Scientific Distinctions in Food and Beverage Systems Across the Comparative Corridor
The literature identifies a continuous biocultural and geoclimatic connection between the Assam floodplains and
the tropical ecosystems of Southeast Asia, both of which rely on ethnobotanical diversity and microbial engi-
neering (Gonsalves, 2025). A key scientific distinction of these trans-border systems is the intentional incorpo-
ration of wild edible plants (WEPs) and medicinal herbs into fermentation processes (Deka et al., 2016; Owens
et al., 2014). For example, the Rabha community in Assam uses Scoparia dulcis (Bakhor jibra), while the Dimasa
employ the bark of the ‘Thempra’ plant. These practices parallel those in Southeast Asia, where local botanicals
are used to regulate acidity, inhibit pathogenic vectors, and introduce specific bioactive secondary metabolites
(Das et al., 2024; Deka et al., 2016; Lilis & Warawut, 2014).
The river valleys and hills of Assam, shaped by the Brahmaputra and Barak rivers, share many geoclimatic and
landscape features with Southeast Asia’s tropical and subtropical regions, including the Mekong, Irrawaddy, and
Chao Phraya basins (Gonsalves, 2025). Research in these fields shows that shared environments have led to the
development of similar traditional resource management practices (Das et al., 2016; Goodridge, 2025). In the
highlands, the rotational shifting or fallow-based farming used by Assam’s hill tribes, like the Karbis and Di-
masas, closely resembles the shifting agriculture (Jhum), (swidden or hai) practised by indigenous upland groups
in northern Thailand, Laos, and Vietnam (Gonsalves, 2025).
Traditional Biotechnology and Indigenous Fermentation Systems
In Assam and Southeast Asia, traditional, solid-state microbiological fermentation is commonly used (Das et al.,
2016; Surya, 2024). Indigenous communities in both regions have developed their own starch-based and carbo-
hydrate-focused biotechnologies to preserve perishable foods and improve nutritional safety in hot, humid cli-
mates (Holzapfel, 2000; Yumnam et al., 2024).
Table 1 Comparative Structural, Ethnobotanical, and Microbiological Profiles of Indigenous Fermenta-
tion Systems in Assam and Southeast Asian Nations
Indicators
Assam Indigenous System
South- East Asia
Primary indicators
Rice-based starter cakes (Humao, Amao,
Bakhor, Apop Pitha) are used to make bever-
ages such as Xaj-pani, Jou, Judima, Nogin,
Sujen, and Apong (Bhattacharya & Deka,
2023).
Rice, cassava, and palm starters
(Ragi tapai, Look-pang, Bubod)
are used to make beverages and
foods, including Tapai, Tapuy, and
Brem (Surya, 2024).
Ethno-botanical
practice
Deliberate integration of wild edible plants
(WEPs) like Scoparia dulcis and Oldenlandia
corymbosa to regulate acidity and introduce
bioactive compounds (Deka et al., 2016).
Inclusion of local functional herbs,
spices, and barks (Piper betle, Al-
pinia galanga) to act as natural an-
timicrobials and sensory modifiers
(Owens et al., 2014).
Dominant Micro-
flora
Phyla: Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacte-
ria
Genera: Lactobacillus, Pediococcus, Saccha-
romyces (Yumnam et al., 2024).
Phyla: Firmicutes, Ascomycota
Genera: Leuconostoc, Aspergillus,
Amylomyces, Candida (Kozaki &
Uchimura, 1990).
Source: Data compiled and adapted from Kozaki & Uchimura (1990), Owens et al. (2014), Deka et al. (2016),
Bhattacharya & Deka (2023), Surya (2024), and Yumnam et al. (2024).
Research Gap
Despite clear historical, geographic, and biotechnological similarities, current research remains fragmented. This
fragmentation highlights a significant research gap that the present study seeks to address.
Page 2894
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
Methodological Isolation: Most existing research is confined to country-specific ethnobotanical catalogues or
highly localised microbial sequencing studies. A unified, cross-border framework that conceptualises Assam and
Southeast Asia as a single, interconnected bio-cultural region is currently lacking.
The Post-2030 Regenerative Blindspot: Past studies have mainly viewed these traditional systems as examples
of heritage preservation or basic sustainability. However, no research has systematically examined how these
indigenous systems fit with global goals for regenerative sustainability after 2030 (Abrahams, 2026; Toner et al.,
2023). Their potential to restore soils, protect microflora, and help buffer climate shocks has not been explored
in theory.
Policy and Governance Disconnect: No empirical research framework currently links the protection strategies
of Assamese tribal councils (including the Deoris, Bodos, and Misings) with community-led food sovereignty
initiatives in Southeast Asia. Consequently, these systems are frequently excluded from global economic and
public health policies, increasing their vulnerability to commercial loss and disappearance.
Limited Empirical Research and Disrupted Biocultural Knowledge Transmission: A significant limitation
in the current literature is the scarcity of comprehensive, evidence-based studies examining the relationship be-
tween traditional biotechnology and regenerative sustainability in this region (Abrahams, 2026; Edgar-Web-
kamigad, 2026).
While some descriptive accounts exist, detailed comparative analyses of indigenous food systems within global
agricultural and public health contexts remain rare, especially in Northeast India and Southeast Asia (Edgar-
Webkamigad, 2026; Sangha, 2026).
There is a notable absence of research evaluating how the rapid loss of traditional ecological knowledge (TEK)
among younger generations contributes to the decline of local microbial ecosystems. The selection of starter
microflora, such as Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, is guided by ethnobotanical practices passed down through
generations.
The recent disruption in this knowledge transmission remains unexamined, resulting in a significant diagnostic
gap regarding strategies to safeguard the metabolic and environmental resources of these indigenous communi-
ties beyond 2030 (Jaggi et al., 2024; Yumnam et al., 2024).
Systematic cross‑regional comparisons of specific starter plant species, fermentation parameters, and socio‑eco-
nomic outcomes are not provided in the supplied literature; therefore, further comparative research is required
to decipher precise similarities and differences (Anupma et al., 2018; Gogoi, 2021; He et al., 2019; Hong et al.,
2015; Mili & Sundriyal, 2023; Sota & Tetsuo, 2011; Yein et al., 2022).
Objectives:
To identify regenerative foods and drinks in Southeast Asian countries,
To analyse the regenerative component of the food and beverages in Assam,
To examine the distinct scientific characteristics of the food and beverage systems of Assam, along with
those of other Southeast Asian countries.
Table 2 Structural Matrix of Research Objectives, Focus Areas, and Geographic Scope
Objective No.
Objective
Type
Focus area
Geography
1
Identify
Regenerative
food and drinks
Southeast Asia
Page 2895
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
2
Analysis
Regenerative
component
Assam
3
Examination
Scientific charac-
teristics
Assam and South-
east Asia
Source: Primary research framework designed and compiled by the author
In objective 1, the framework sets broad guidelines by identifying core regenerative food systems across South-
east Asia’s biocultural landscape. Objective 2 of the study examines fermentation practices unique to Assam's
diverse riverine floodplains. Finally, Objective 3 brings these findings together for a cross-border comparison.
METHODOLOGY
This study utilises secondary data, drawing on evidence-based research from multiple bio-cultural literature ar-
chives and journals to deploy the comparative approach (Gough et al., 2017).
Research design and Framework: The current methodology scientifically extracts, harmonises, and synthe-
sises published empirical data across a contiguous bio-cultural corridor. The analytical lens system is grounded
in The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) for Agriculture and Food framework, evaluating
historical and contemporary secondary datasets available across a multi-capital matrix: natural capital (agrobio-
diversity data), human capital (nutraceutical and physiological metrics), social capital (institutional governance
structures), and produced capital (traditional biotechnological fermentation yields) (UN Environment, 2018).
Figure 1 Methodological Flowchart of the Secondary Evidence-Based Meta-Synthesis Framework for
Trans-Border Bio-Cultural Analysis.
Source: Created by the researcher based on objectives (2026)
The secondary evidence-based framework is structured into three sequential phases to ensure internal structural
validity and to transform raw historical datasets into an integrated policy model. Phase 1 establishes objective
data boundaries via a strict PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses)
guided search across global and regional databases, eliminating selection bias by screening exclusively for ver-
ified metagenomic, ethnobotanical, and socio-ecological records. Phase 2 serves as a vital calibration of relevant
data, extracting and mapping disparate qualitative ethnographic text and evidence from microflora percentages
from Assam and Southeast Asia onto standardised variables to resolve comparative reporting of consistencies.
Finally, Phase 3 drives the analytical synthesis by processing these harmonised datasets to fit into qualitative
meta-ethnography.
Secondary Evidence Systematic Review & Meta-Synthesis Workflow
Phase 1
Systematic Search Strategy & Screen
Phase 2
Data Extraction, Harmonization, and Categorization
Phase 3
Meta-Synthesis and Secondary Analytical Modeling
Page 2896
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
Protocol for Systematic Identification and Inclusion Criteria (Phase 1)
To operationalise Phase 1, the systematic search strategy must be bound by explicit string mechanics and strict
eligibility criteria to eliminate selection bias.
Search Strategy and Database Matrices
Electronic searches will be executed across primary international databases (PubMed, ScienceDirect, Wiley
Online Library) and specialised regional repositories (Shodhganga for localised Indian doctoral research, and
CGSpace for Southeast Asian agricultural monographs). Boolean logic search strings will be deployed to capture
the intersection of traditional biotechnology and geography:
String A (Assam Corridor): ("Assam" OR "Northeast India") AND ("fermented beverage" OR "starter cake"
OR "ethnobotany" OR "ethnic food")
String B (Southeast Asian Corridor): ("Southeast Asia" OR "Thailand" OR "Indonesia" OR "Malaysia" OR
"Philippines") AND ("Ragi" OR "Look-pang" OR "Bubod" OR "starter culture")
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria- To be eligible for meta-synthesis, a study must meet the following strict
criterion, they are as follows:
Inclusion Criteria: (1) Peer-reviewed journal articles, book chapters, or doctoral dissertations published up to
the current horizon; (2) Studies reporting explicit quantitative relative abundances (%) of microflora at the phy-
lum, family, or genus level; (3) Studies containing descriptive ethnobotanical or institutional data regarding the
Deori, Bodo, Mising, Dimasa, Karbi, or Rabha communities in Assam, or corresponding indigenous groups in
Southeast Asia.
Exclusion Criteria: (1) Studies focusing purely on commercial, large-scale industrial fermentations; (2) Review
articles lacking original secondary datasets or explicit ethnographic context.
Data Extraction and Harmonisation Protocols (Phase 2): To operationalise Phase 2, a standardised extraction
protocol is required to resolve reporting inconsistencies across disparate historical datasets.
Qualitative Data Extraction: For socio-ecological and institutional variables, text segments detailing tradi-
tional ecological knowledge (TEK), wild edible plant (WEP) selections, ancestral transmission lines, and tribal
council governance mechanisms will be compiled into text blocks. These blocks will serve as the raw data units
for qualitative secondary analysis.
Secondary Data Analysis and Synthesis Models (Phase 3): Phase 3 converts the calibrated data into an inte-
grated policy model by executing twin statistical and interpretive syntheses.
Qualitative Meta-Synthesis (Meta-Ethnography): Utilising a descriptive institutional practice of Assamese
tribal councils will be systematically cross-compared with community-led food sovereignty frameworks in
Southeast Asia to isolate shared vulnerabilities.
RESULTS AND EMPIRICAL SYNTHESIS
The results are presented below, systematically organised by three research objectives, utilising the four capitals
framework of TEEB (Dong, X. et al., 2012), (The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity).
Structural Identification of Regenerative Bio-Cultural Matrices in Southeast Asia: The systematic screen-
ing and empirical data extraction from global agricultural repositories and microbiological datasets (Phase 1)
identified a highly conserved portfolio of non-extractive, solid-state starch and legume fermentations throughout
Southeast Asian nations (Surya, 2024). The synthesised data reveal that indigenous communities across varying
tropical eco-regions have optimised the utilisation of climate-resilient raw materials, predominantly cassava
Page 2897
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
landraces, glutinous rice varieties, and wild palm saps, to generate stable food and beverage systems (Dung et
al., 2007; Gandjar, 2003). These configurations operate as highly efficient produced capital assets by leveraging
traditional microbial engineering to prevent spoilage and stabilise perishable biomass under humid tropical
macro-climates, completely independent of energy-intensive industrial cold chains (Holzapfel, 2000; Surya,
2024).
Meta-synthesis of regional literature identifies three foundational ancestral starter cultures that serve as func-
tional socio-ecological blueprints:
Ragi Tapai Core (Malaysia and Indonesia): This mixed-culture carbohydrate starter is optimised for convert-
ing cassava and traditional glutinous rice landraces into nutrient-dense, easily digestible functional foods known
as Tapai or Tape (Gandjar, 2003; Surya, 2024).
Look-Pang Core (Thailand): This botanically driven fungal-yeast cake is used to naturally saccharify and fer-
ment traditional upland rice varieties under ambient tropical conditions (Kozaki & Uchimura, 1990; Luraida &
Krusong, 2014).
Bubod Core (Philippines): This ancestral starter culture is preserved by indigenous upland communities to
ferment mountain rice landraces into low-alcohol Tapuy beverages, functioning as an essential buffer for com-
munity food security (Kozaki & Uchimura, 1990; Owens et al., 2014).
Analysis of Regenerative Components in Assam's Indigenous Foodways: The qualitative meta-ethnography
and secondary text block extraction (Phase 2) isolate distinct, baseline regenerative components across the tar-
geted ethnic groups of Assam, specifically the Deori, Bodo, Mising, Dimasa, Karbi, and Rabha communities
(Das et al., 2016; Yumnam et al., 2024). These components map directly onto the human and social capital
dimensions of the post-2030 sustainability horizon.
Human Capital: Phytochemical and Physiological Outcomes: Secondary biochemical datasets indicate that
the standard dietary intake of traditional beverages such as Xaj-pani, Jou, Judima, Nogin, Sujen, and Apong
confers specific metabolic benefits (Bhaskar et al., 2023; Bhattacharya & Deka, 2023). The meta-synthesis of
nutritional and animal-model studies shows that these traditional formulations are highly enriched with:
Short-Chain Fatty Acids (SCFAs): These are essential for maintaining gut epithelial cell structure, regulating
faecal metabolites, and reducing metabolic inflammation among tribal populations engaged in intensive agricul-
tural labour (Bhaskar et al., 2023; Tonchaiyaphum et al., 2024).
Essential Bio-Vitamins and Organic Acids: Synthesised during long-term solid-state fermentation by non-
pathogenic lactic acid bacteria, significantly elevating the nutritional value of baseline carbohydrates (Das et al.,
2024, 2025).
Social Capital: Local Institutional Governance and Biocultural Transmission: Qualitative thematic coding
of historical ethnographic data reveals that these fermentation frameworks function as highly organised social
institutions rather than simple domestic tasks (Das et al., 2016). The production of traditional starter cakes such
as Humao (Deori), Amao/Angkur (Bodo), and Bakhor (Rabha) is governed by fine-scale local networks curated
almost exclusively by women elders (Bhattacharya & Deka, 2023; Deka et al., 2016). This collective curation
of Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) serves as a critical community safety net, preserving household
food sovereignty, managing local plant resources, and maintaining social cohesion across generations during
cyclic socio-religious festivals (Bhattacharya & Deka, 2023; Das et al., 2016).
Comparative Analysis of Scientific Characteristics Across the Trans-Border Corridor
A comparative meta-synthesis confirms significant evolutionary convergence in traditional biotechnology be-
tween the indigenous food systems of Assam and Southeast Asia, establishing a structurally contiguous trans-
border biocultural corridor (Bhattacharya & Deka, 2023; Surya, 2024). The ethnobotanical selection mechanisms
were based on Pathogen suppression and Bioactive Enrichment of ethnic practices, as follows.
Page 2898
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
Ethnobotanical Selection Mechanisms: Secondary data confirm that the intentional integration of wild edible
plants (WEPs) and medicinal flora into fermentation starters is a defining scientific characteristic shared by both
regions (Deka et al., 2016; Owens et al., 2014). Comparative analysis of these botanical selection mechanisms
reveals distinct functional parallels:
Pathogen Suppression: Indigenous practitioners employ taxonomically distinct yet functionally similar plants,
such as Scoparia dulcis or Oldenlandia corymbosa in Assamese Bakhor or Humao cakes and Piper betle or
Alpinia galanga in Southeast Asian Ragi or Look-pang, to serve as natural antimicrobials that suppress patho-
genic vectors and regulate batch acidity (Deka et al., 2016; Luraida & Krusong, 2014; Owens et al., 2014).
Bioactive Enrichment: These botanical additives introduce secondary metabolites and essential phytochemi-
cals, functioning as natural chemical regulators that determine the metabolic profile of the final fermented prod-
uct (Das et al., 2024; Owens et al., 2014).
Conserved Metagenomic and Microbial Architectures: The secondary meta-analysis of high-throughput se-
quencing data establishes a highly conserved core microbial architecture across the study's geographic contin-
uum (Fig. 2).
Fig 2: Relative abundance (%) of functional microbial phyla in traditional starter cultures from Assam
and Southeast Asia
Source: Diagram created by the authors based on data synthesised from Ethnobiology and fermentation studies
by Mili and Sundriyal (2023), He et al. (2019), Hong et al. (2015), and Anupma et al. (2018).
Figure 2 shows that the main biological link across this trans-border corridor is the dominance of the phylum
Firmicutes in both Assamese starter matrices (60%) and Southeast Asian analogues (55%) (Kozaki & Uchimura,
1990; Yumnam et al., 2024). At the genus level, both systems have high levels of beneficial, non-spore-forming
probiotics, especially Lactobacillus, Pediococcus, and Leuconostoc (Bhaskar et al., 2023; Surya, 2024).
The secondary prevalence of Bacteroidetes (25% in Assam, 20% in Southeast Asia) indicates a shared evolu-
tionary adaptation for the degradation of complex polysaccharides and starches (Bhaskar et al., 2023; Yumnam
et al., 2024). The principal scientific distinction is observed within the fungal communities: Southeast Asian
matrices contain higher levels of the phylum Ascomycota, particularly amylolytic yeasts such as Amylomyces
and Aspergillus, which facilitate saccharification in humid coastal environments (Dung et al., 2007; Kozaki &
Uchimura, 1990). In contrast, Assamese starters depend more on indigenous Saccharomyces lineages adapted to
subtropical river-valley ecosystems (Bhattacharya & Deka, 2023; Yumnam et al., 2024).
Page 2899
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
Table 3 Empirical Synthesis of Indigenous Biotechnology Assets Across the Assam Southeast Asia Bio-
Cultural Corridor
Geographic
Zone & Target
Cohorts
Primary Fermen-
tation Vehicle &
Starter Cake Sys-
tem
Dominant Micro-
flora Taxa (Phy-
lum/Genus)
Phytochemical &
Nutraceutical Pro-
file
Post-2030 TEEB
Capital Classifica-
tion & Function
Assam Flood-
plains
(Deori, Mising,
Bodo, Rabha, Di-
masa, Karbi)
Rice-based bever-
ages (Xaj-pani,
Jou, Judima, No-
gin, Sujen, Apong)
via botanical cakes
(Humao, Amao,
Bakhor, Apop Pi-
tha).
Phyla: Firmicutes
(60%), Bacteroide-
tes (25%)
(Yumnam et al.,
2024).
Genera: Lactoba-
cillus, Pediococcus,
Saccharomyces
(Bhaskar et al.,
2023)
Highly enriched
with Short-Chain
Fatty Acids
(SCFAs), organic
acids, essential bio-
vitamins, and im-
munomodulatory
metabolites
(Bhaskar et al.,
2023; Das et al.,
2024).
Human & Social
Capital: Provides
metabolic energy re-
silience for intensive
agricultural labour
and is maintained via
female-led institu-
tional knowledge net-
works (Bhattacharya
& Deka, 2023; Das et
al., 2016).
Southeast Asia
Uplands
(Upland/
Mountain Tribal
Cohorts)
Rice and cassava
solid-state foods
and beverages
(Tapai/Tape, Ta-
puy, Brem) via
mixed amylolytic
cultures (Ragi
tapai, Look-pang,
Bubod).
Phyla: Firmicutes
(55%), Ascomy-
cota (25%) (Kozaki
& Uchimura,
1990).
Genera: Leuconos-
toc, Weissella, Am-
ylomyces, Asper-
gillus (Surya,
2024).
Elevated concentra-
tion of antioxidant
phenolic com-
pounds, anti-inflam-
matory secondary
metabolites, and
functional digestive
enzymes (Surya,
2024; Tonchaiya-
phum et al., 2024).
Natural & Produced
Capital: Optimises
seasonal biomass uti-
lisation without in-
dustrial energy; safe-
guards agrobiodiver-
sity of climate-resili-
ent starch landraces
(Gandjar, 2003;
Sangha, 2026).
Source: Data synthesised from secondary metagenomic and ethnobotanical datasets across
Phase 2 and Phase 3 data harmonisation protocols
Table 3 shows a clear evolutionary convergence in the connected bio-cultural corridor. Geographic differences
lead to changes in substrate selection and the types of fungi present. For example, Southeast Asian starters har-
bour more amylolytic Ascomycota (25%), which accelerate saccharification in humid coastal areas. Still, the
main functional core is very similar across regions (Kozaki & Uchimura, 1990; Surya, 2024). In both regions,
Firmicutes (55%–60%) are the most common, helping to keep food safe and prevent spoilage in tropical climates
(Kozaki & Uchimura, 1990; Yumnam et al., 2024).
Bacteroidetes (20%–25%) are also found, showing a shared evolutionary adaptation that helps break down com-
plex polysaccharides and starch (Bhaskar et al., 2023; Yumnam et al., 2024). Using the TEEB framework with
Table 4 suggests these local technologies act as self-sustaining assets. Small-scale biological interactions support
human health, food security, and social resilience, all of which are important for sustainability goals beyond
2030 (Abrahams, 2026; Edgar-Webkamigad, 2026).
Synthesis of the Structural Cross-Border Regenerative Gap Beyond 2030: The secondary evidence shows
that although these independent, multi-species microbial assets are structurally robust, they remain highly sen-
sitive to economic changes, government agricultural policies, and river systems (Ray, 2025). Current interna-
tional climate adaptation policies often overlook these detailed institutional dynamics and small-scale microbial
assets, so the value of these systems as models for global regenerative sustainability after 2030 is not fully rec-
Page 2900
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
ognised (Abrahams, 2026; Toner et al., 2023). By bringing these secondary assets together into a single frame-
work, the findings show that the traditional food systems of Assam and Southeast Asia function as active, self-
healing, and multi-capital models. These systems can restore soil health, protect microflora, and help buffer
climate shocks across borders (Edgar-Webkamigad, 2026; Sangha, 2026).
GENERAL DISCUSSION
A review of secondary data from the Assam–Southeast Asia biocultural corridor shows that local traditional
biotechnology helps stabilise the system and acts as a self-renewing asset within the TEEB framework. Meta-
genomic data reveal strong evolutionary similarity, with Firmicutes accounting for 60% of Assamese starter
cultures and 55% of Southeast Asian ones. This similarity creates a shared group of helpful probiotics, such as
Lactobacillus, Pediococcus, and Leuconostoc, which turn carbohydrates into short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs)
and bio-vitamins (Bhaskar et al., 2023; Kozaki & Uchimura, 1990; Yumnam et al., 2024). While local climates
cause differences in the types of fungi present, such as more amylolytic Ascomycota (Amylomyces and Asper-
gillus) in humid coastal Southeast Asia and more native Saccharomyces in the Assamese river valleys, the main
bioprocess remains the same (Dung et al., 2007; Yumnam et al., 2024).
This microbial resource is maintained through an ethnobotanical selection process, in which people in both re-
gions use different but similar wild edible plants, such as Scoparia dulcis or Oldenlandia corymbosa in Assam
and Piper betle or Alpinia galanga in Southeast Asia, to control pathogens and to add bioactive compounds.
This approach encourages the conservation of local natural resources (Deka et al., 2016; Owens et al., 2014). On
a social level, these fermentation systems are managed by networks of women elders and serve as important
community institutions.
However, this body of Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) is at risk after 2030, as shifts toward cash-crop
farming, environmental changes, and the weakening of intergenerational knowledge transfer threaten these di-
verse microbial systems (Bhattacharya & Deka, 2023; Das et al., 2016; Jaggi et al., 2024).
Marketisation, Intellectual Property Branding, and the Regenerative Bioeconomy Framework: When
evaluated through an economic lens, the trans-border translation of traditional biotechnology from a localised
domestic practice into a formal market asset highlights a critical vehicle for rural economic self-reliance and
regional branding.
The granting of Geographical Indication (GI) registration under the federal legal framework to distinct indige-
nous beverages—most notably Judima of the Dimasa community marks an empirical turning point, transforming
collective ancestral heritage into a protected legal intellectual property right. Secondary trade data and institu-
tional reviews indicate that formal branding and organised marketing of these fermented matrices significantly
elevate production and social capital metrics by enabling premium pricing and structured brand building.
By packaging these beverages as premium, sustainable "terroir-driven" products linked entirely to their geo-
graphical origin, local producers can effectively access urban and global speciality beverage markets, providing
a reliable source of income for indigenous smallholders and female-led cooperative guilds. Importantly, this
commercial trajectory adheres to a rigorous regenerative bioeconomy framework.
Ecosystem Services Support: Rather than promoting industrial, single-crop farming that harms local soil and
genetic diversity, the higher value of GI-branded products encourages communities to sustainably protect and
manage agrobiodiversity, home gardens, and wild edible plant ecosystems.
Value-Added Processing: Turning local rice and starch varieties into value-added products with longer shelf
lives helps reduce post-harvest waste and the carbon footprint by avoiding energy-intensive supply chains.
Biocultural Continuity Safeguards: When economic profits are directed to the original community custodians
as collective rights, market-driven branding can provide them with the resources they need to protect local mi-
crobial ecosystems and pass on traditional ecological knowledge to future generations.
Page 2901
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
RECOMMENDATIONS AND PRACTICAL INTERVENTIONS
To address this policy gap and support a regenerative food culture, here are some structural and community-
level suggestions. These steps aim to make traditional biotechnology a valuable tool for sustainable development
in Northeast India.
Figure 3 Dual-Track Intervention Matrix for Northeast India's Regenerative Bioeconomy
Source: Created by the author (2026)
Socio-Ecological Interventions for Biocultural Preservation: Establishment of Digital TEK Registries and
Community Knowledge Protocols: To halt the erosion of oral traditions, local tribal councils (such as the Deori
Autonomous Council) should collaborate with research institutions to build digital, community-owned Tradi-
tional Ecological Knowledge registries. These open-access yet legally protected databases should systematically
document the exact seasonal harvesting timelines, botanical taxonomy, and preparation ratios of WEPs used in
starter cakes (Humao, Amao, Bakhor), thereby preserving this intellectual property against external biopiracy.
State forest departments and local panchayats should establish protected areas known as "Biocultural Corridors"
and community-managed reserves in river floodplains and hilly areas. These reserves would protect the habitats
of wild medicinal plants, such as Scoparia dulcis, from expansion of farming and large-scale agriculture. This
helps maintain local natural resources.
To keep traditional knowledge alive, social work departments and local leaders should support community-based
apprentice programs. These programs would pair young people with women elders in formal "Microbiological
Heritage Guilds." This way, the detailed, ritual techniques for working with different microbes can be passed
down, helping to prevent important local microflora from being lost.
Macro-Economic Interventions for Regenerative Marketisation: Local governments should help set up
small, solar-powered processing centres run by women-led cooperatives. These centres would turn local rice and
starch varieties into fermented products that last longer and reduce waste. By highlighting the unique environ-
mental and cultural roots of these drinks, rural communities can reach high-value markets in cities and abroad,
while keeping supply chains short and eco-friendly.
Expansion of Geographical Indication (GI) and Appellation Protection: Building on the successful GI tag regis-
tration for the Dimasa community’s Judima, urgent legal steps should be taken to secure GI tags for other sig-
nature ethnic fermentations, such as Xaj-pani, Jou, and Apong. These intellectual property tools must include
legally binding collective rights frameworks that ensure financial premiums flow directly back to indigenous
custodians to fund local conservation.
Regenerative Food
Culture Interventions
(NE India
Macro-Economic Level
"Biocultural Terroir" Hubs
Appellation Protection
Green-Premium Financing
Socio-Ecological Level
Digital TEK Registries
In-Situ Botanical Reserves
Youth-Elder Micro-Guilds
Page 2902
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
State planning boards in Northeast India should include traditional fermentation methods in their green financing
and bioeconomy plans. By treating these local, low-impact technologies as real, carbon-neutral options instead
of industrial food production, states can access climate funding. This change would help support traditional
resource management, new farming methods, and fish-rice systems, making Northeast India a leader in sustain-
able food culture after 2030.
CONCLUSION
This study demonstrates that indigenous food and beverage systems within the contiguous Assam–Southeast
Asia bio-cultural corridor are dynamic, self-healing capital assets rather than static cultural artefacts. These sys-
tems provide a critical blueprint for regenerative sustainability beyond 2030. Through a secondary, evidence-
based meta-synthesis, the empirical findings reveal significant evolutionary convergence across this trans-border
region, characterised by the taxonomic dominance of the phylum Firmicutes and a shared ethnobotanical selec-
tion logic that enhances environmental resilience, stabilises biomass, and protects human physiology. Analysis
using the TEEB framework indicates that these traditional biotechnologies operate as highly organised, female-
led social institutions, effectively linking micro-level microbial ecosystems with macro-level household food
sovereignty and natural capital conservation. Nevertheless, these systems remain vulnerable to rapid macroeco-
nomic transitions, top-down monocultural policies, and climate-induced riverine disruptions, all of which
threaten the transmission of generational knowledge. To address this cross-border regenerative gap, policy
frameworks should prioritise protecting localised agrobiodiversity, establishing community-managed botanical
reserves, and implementing legal intellectual property protections, such as Geographical Indications. These
measures can facilitate the transformation of ancestral assets into a self-sustaining regional bioeconomy. Recog-
nising and scaling the multi-capital dynamics of these indigenous foodways presents a transformative, decen-
tralised approach to global ecological restoration and community resilience beyond 2030.
REFERENCES
1. Abrahams, A. K. (2026). Cultivating regenerative aquaculture: A conceptual framework based on a review
of regenerative food systems literature. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 10, Article 1657695.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2026.1657695
2. Anupma, A., Pradhan, P., Sha, S. P., & Tamang, J. P. (2018). Traditional skill of ethnic people of the Eastern
Himalayas and Northeast India in preserving microbiota as dry amylolytic starters. Indian Journal of Tra-
ditional Knowledge, 17(1), 122–130.
3. Arp, J. T. (2026). Exploring the nexus between regenerative agriculture and soil health: A special emphasis
on semi-arid and arid agriculture. Frontiers in Agronomy, 8, Article 1666008.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2026.1666008
4. Banjaw, D. T. (2019). A review of the traditional practices of starter cultures and methods of production of
traditional alcoholic beverages in Africa and other parts of the world. Journal of Scientific Research and
Reports, 24(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2019/v24i330150
5. Barman, A. (2011). Comparative Human Resource Development for Mekong-Ganga Sub-Region: A Case-
Based Appreciation on India’s HRD Collaboration (August 22, 2011). Available at
SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1914186 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1914186
6. Barman, A. (2012). Intensity of Cross-National HRD Collaboration: An Assessment of India and South
East Asia; International Journal of Management and Social Sciences (IJMSS), Volume 1 (2) January
2012; pp. 224–235 (2012)
7. Baruah, I., & Gogoi, R. (2020). Traditional knowledge of ethnomedicinal plants used by the Ahom com-
munity of Assam, Northeast India. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 9(1), 1040–1047.
8. Baruah, R., & Bora, S. S. (2019). Lactic acid bacteria in traditional fermented foods of Northeast India:
Diversity and functional properties. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 56(8), 3566–3577.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-019-03840-w
9. Bharucha, Z., & Pretty, J. (2010). The roles and values of wild foods in agricultural systems. Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365(1554), 2913–2926.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0123
Page 2903
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
10. Bhattacharjee, S., Routh, S., Mukhopadhyay, B., & Bhattacharya, S. (2023). Bacterial community profiling
of rice-based fermented liquor of Rabha tribe of North Bengal using metagenomics. Current Microbiology,
80(4), Article 119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-023-03223-5
11. Bhattacharya, B., & Deka, D. C. (2023). Biochemical indices and consumption pattern of traditional alco-
holic beverages by tribal communities of Northeast India: A review. Current Research in Nutrition and
Food Science Journal, 11(2), 470–487. https://doi.org/10.12944/crnfsj.11.2.02
12. Bora, S. S., Keot, J., Das, S., Sarma, K., & Barooah, M. (2016). Metagenomics analysis of microbial
communities associated with a traditional rice wine starter culture (Xaj-pitha) of Assam, India. 3 Biotech,
6(2), Article 153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-016-0471-1
13. Borah, P., & Das, P. (2018). Ethnobotanical survey of wild edible plants used by the Bodo community of
Chirang district of Assam, India. Asian Journal of Plant Science and Research, 8(2), 56–67.
14. Brahma, S., & Giri, R. K. (2022). Traditional fermented food products of the Bodo tribes of Assam: A
documentation. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 18(1), Article 31.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-022-00527-4
15. Cabalion, P., & Morat, P. (2001). Introduction to traditional food systems and local ecological knowledge
in the Pacific Islands. SPC Traditional Marine Resource Management and Knowledge Information Bulle-
tin, 13, 3–12.
16. Calloway, C. B. (2021). Indigenous food systems of Southeast Asia: Traditional practices and contempo-
rary relevance. Asian Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 22(3), 267–284.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2021.1903445
17. Chay-Prove, P., De Lacy Costello, B., & Ramsden, R. (2020). Indigenous food plants of the Mekong Re-
gion: Ethnobotanical knowledge, food sovereignty, and sustainability. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 250,
Article 112477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2019.112477
18. Das, A. J., & Deka, S. C. (2012). Fermented foods and beverages of Northeast India. International Food
Research Journal, 19(2), 377–392.
19. Das, A. J., Deka, S. C., & Miyaji, T. (2012). Methodology of rice beer preparation and various plant ma-
terials used in starter culture preparation by some tribal communities of Northeast India: A survey. Inter-
national Food Research Journal, 19(1), 101–107.
20. Das, G., Patra, J. K., Singdevsachan, S. K., Gouda, S., & Shin, H.-S. (2016). Diversity of traditional and
fermented foods of the Seven Sister states of India and their nutritional and nutraceutical potential: A re-
view. Frontiers in Life Science, 9(4), 292–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/21553769.2016.1249032
21. Das, P., Bhattacharjee, S., Mandal, S., Mondal, K. C., & Pati, B. R. (2019). Microbial diversity of rice-
based traditional fermented beverages (apong, joubishi, and xaaj) of Assam. LWT Food Science and
Technology, 116, Article 108574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108574
22. Dong, X., Wei-kun, Y., Ulgiati, S., Yan, M., & Zhang, X. (2012). The impact of human activities on natural
capital and ecosystem services of natural pastures in North Xinjiang, China. Ecological Modelling.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.11.006
23. Dutta, D., & Bhattacharyya, S. (2021). Shifting cultivation and tribal food systems in Northeast India:
Ecological and nutritional implications. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 3, Article
100046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2021.100046
24. Edgar-Webkamigad, E. (2026). Braiding knowledge systems: Integrating indigenous wisdom and sustain-
able research for a regenerative future. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 14(6), 125–138.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5c12623
25. FAO. (2019). The state of the world's biodiversity for food and agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organi-
sation of the United Nations.
26. France, E. F., Cunningham, M., Ring, N., Uny, I., Duncan, E. A. S., Jepson, R. G., Maxwell, M., Roberts,
R. J., Turley, R. L., Booth, A., Britten, N., Flemming, K., Gallagher, I., Garside, R., Hannes, K., Lewin,
S., Noblit, G. W., Pope, C., Thomas, J., . . . Noyes, J. (2019). Improving reporting of meta-ethnography:
The eMERGe reporting guidance. Psycho-Oncology, 28(5), 447–458. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4915
27. Galmiche, M., Huneau, J. F., Mahe, S., & Tome, D. (2023). Fermented foods and the gut microbiome:
Insights from meta-omics approaches. Nutrients, 15(4), Article 877. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15040877
28. Gandjar, I. (2003). Tapai from cassava and cereals. In E. R. Farnworth (Ed.), Handbook of fermented
functional foods (pp. 347–374). CRC Press.
Page 2904
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
29. Garnett, T., Appleby, M. C., Balmford, A., Bateman, I. J., Benton, T. G., Bloomer, P., Burlingame, B.,
Dawkins, M., Dolan, L., Fraser, D., Herrero, M., Hoffmann, I., Smith, P., Thornton, P. K., Toulmin, C.,
Vermeulen, S. J., & Godfray, H. C. J. (2013). Sustainable intensification in agriculture: Premises and pol-
icies. Science, 341(6141), 33–34. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1234485
30. Ghatage, M. N., & Bhole, B. D. (2022). Ethnobotanical notes on plants used in traditional beverages of
tribal communities of Assam. Biodiversity International Journal, 6(1), 18–26.
https://doi.org/10.15406/bij.2022.06.00246
31. Ghosh, K., Ray, M., Adak, A., Halder, S. K., Das, A., Jana, A., Mondal, K. C., & Pati, B. R. (2015). Role
of probiotic Lactobacillus fermentum KKL1 in the preparation of a rice-based fermented beverage. Biore-
source Technology, 188, 161–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.01.130
32. Giri, S. S., Sen, S. S., Jun, J. W., Sukumaran, V., & Park, S. C. (2018). Evaluation of probiotic properties
of lactic acid bacteria isolated from fermented rice beverage of tribal people of Northeast India. Probiotics
and Antimicrobial Proteins, 10(2), 330–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-017-9349-7
33. Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Pretty, J., Robinson,
S., Thomas, S. M., & Toulmin, C. (2010). Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Sci-
ence, 327(5967), 812–818. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185383
34. Gogoi, G. (2021). Traditional knowledge on preparation of starter culture cakes and rice beers by the
Chaodang community of Upper Assam, India. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 20(71).
https://doi.org/10.31783/elsr.2021.716375
35. Gonsalves, J. F. (2025). Southeast Asian experiences on resource management: Shifting or rotational farm-
ing systems and restoration of degraded lands. CGSpace.
36. Goodridge, S. (2025). The role of indigenous ecological knowledge in climate-resilient food systems.
American University.
37. Gurung, N., Ray, S., Bose, S., & Rai, V. (2013). A broader view: Microbial enzymes and their relevance
in industries, medicine, and beyond. BioMed Research International, 2013, Article 329121.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/329121
38. Harlan, J. R. (1992). Crops and Man (2nd ed.)—American Society of Agronomy.
39. Hazarika, T. K., Lalramchhana, & Singh, P. K. (2018). Ethnic fermented foods and beverages of Mizoram:
A review. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 17(3), 565–573.
40. He, J., Chen, H., Zhang, R., & Tang, X. (2019). Diversity, knowledge, and valuation of plants used as
fermentation starters for traditional glutinous rice wine by Dong communities in Southeast Guizhou,
China. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 15(1), Article 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-019-
0299-y
41. Hill, R., Adem, Ç., Alangui, W. V., Molnár, Z., Aumeeruddy-Thomas, Y., Bridgewater, P., Tengö, M.,
Fisher, R., Gueze, M., Biggs, R., Black-Layne, D., Díaz, S., Frainer, A., Furukawa, T., Gundimeda, H.,
Hendricks, T., Jonas, H., Maharaj, S., Masardule, O., & Yao, T. L. A. (2020). Working with indigenous,
local and scientific knowledge in assessments of nature and nature's contributions to people. Current Opin-
ion in Environmental Sustainability, 43, 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.12.006
42. Holzapfel, W. H. (2000). Appropriate roles for microbes in traditional food fermentations of the Global
South. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 58(3), 197–207.
43. Hong, L., Guo, Z., Huang, K., Wei, S., Liu, B., Meng, S., & Long, C. (2015). Ethnobotany of wild plants
used for starting fermented beverages in Shui communities of southwest China. Journal of Ethnobiology
and Ethnomedicine, 11(1), Article 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-015-0028-0
44. Jaggi, H., Anand, A., Solari, K. A., Echeverri, A., Tobge, R., Tsewang, T., Suryawanshi, K., & Tuljapurkar,
S. (2024). Biocultural vulnerability of traditional crops in the Indian Trans Himalaya (Preprint). Cold
Spring Harbour Laboratory. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.22.619747
45. Jayaram, P., Nair, A. S., & Nampoothiri, K. M. (2023). Integrating traditional fermentation science with
modern biotechnology for sustainable food production in Southeast Asia. Bioresource Technology Re-
ports, 21, Article 101363.
46. Kanter, R., Kennedy, G., & Boza, S. (2023). Editorial: Local, traditional and indigenous food systems in
the 21st century to combat obesity, undernutrition and climate change. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Sys-
tems, 7, Article 1195741. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1195741
47. Kassam, A., Friedrich, T., & Derpsch, R. (2019). Global spread of conservation agriculture. International
Journal of Environmental Studies, 76(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2018.1494927
Page 2905
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
48. Katz, S. E. (2012). The art of fermentation: An in-depth exploration of essential concepts and processes
from around the world. Chelsea Green Publishing.
49. Kuhnlein, H. V., & Receveur, O. (1996). Dietary change and traditional food systems of Indigenous Peo-
ples. Annual Review of Nutrition, 16, 417–442.
50. Kuhnlein, H. V., Erasmus, B., & Spigelski, D. (Eds.). (2009). Indigenous peoples' food systems: The many
dimensions of culture, diversity and environment for nutrition and health. Food and Agriculture Organisa-
tion of the United Nations.
51. Lahiri, S., & Bhattacharya, A. (2021). Documentation of traditional bioresources used in rice-based fer-
mented beverages by the tribes of Barak Valley, Assam. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 265, Article
113391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2020.113391
52. Lang, T., & Barling, D. (2012). Food security and food sustainability: Reformulating the debate. The Ge-
ographical Journal, 178(4), 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4959.2012.00480.x
53. Lim, T. K. (2012). Edible medicinal and non-medicinal plants: Volume 1, fruits. Springer.
54. Mahanta, R., & Kalita, D. (2020). Wild edible plants used as food by the indigenous communities of the
upper Brahmaputra valley districts of Assam, India. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 16(1),
Article 60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-020-00412-3
55. Mao, A. A., & Odyuo, N. (2007). Traditional fermented foods of the Naga tribes of Northeastern India.
Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 6(1), 37–41.
56. Mazur, A., & Miller, B. D. (2022). Biocultural approaches to sustainable food systems: Rethinking the
place of indigenous knowledge. Ecology and Society, 27(2), Article 12. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13263-
270212
57. Mili, R., & Sundriyal, R. C. (2023). ÉPOP (traditional starter culture): A complex composition of plant
resources prepared by the Misings of Assam, Northeast India. Journal of Ethnic Foods, 10, Article 44.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42779-023-00214-2
58. Narzary, H., Srivastava, S. K., & Datta, B. K. (2013). Wild edible plants used by the Bodo tribe of
Kokrajhar district (Assam), Northeast India. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, 7(30), 2193–2202.
https://doi.org/10.5897/JMPR12.519
59. Narzary, Y., Das, S., Goswami, G., Marik, T., & Barman, D. (2019). Study on the indigenous traditional
process of rice wine (judima) used by the Dimasa Kachari tribes of Dima Hasao district of Assam. Inter-
national Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 8(2), 2038–2048.
https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.802.237
60. Nath, A. J., Reang, D., Sileshi, G. W., & Das, A. K. (2024). The transition from shifting cultivation to
indigenous agroforestry as a nature-based solution for land restoration in the Indian Eastern Himalayas.
Ecological Indicators, 161, Article 111993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111993
61. Negi, V. S., Pathak, R., Thakur, S., Bhatt, I. D., Rawal, R. S., & Bhatt, A. (2023). Scoping the need for
mainstreaming indigenous knowledge for sustainable use of bioresources in the Indian Himalayan Region.
Environmental Management, 72(1), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-022-01741-1
62. Ngasotter, S., Kumar, S. P., Mohanty, B. P., Waikhom, G., Panda, S. P., Singh, C. S., & Halami, P. M.
(2021). Status of fermented fish and fishery by-products in Northeast India: A review. Frontiers in Micro-
biology, 12, Article 631130. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.631130
63. Owens, J. D., Astuti, M., & Kuswanto, K. R. (2014). Indigenous fermented foods of Southeast Asia. CRC
Press.
64. Padoch, C., & Pinedo-Vázquez, M. (2010). Saving slash-and-burn to save biodiversity. Biotropica, 42(5),
550–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2010.00681.x
65. Pavez, F., Pavez, F., Maxwell, D., & Bunster, V. (2024). Towards a Regenerative Design Project Delivery
Workflow: A Critical Review. Sustainability, 16(13), 5377.
66. Posey, D. A. (Ed.). (1999). Cultural and spiritual values of biodiversity. UNEP/Intermediate Technology
Publications.
67. Pretty, J., Benton, T. G., Bharucha, Z. P., Dicks, L. V., Butler-Flora, C., Godfray, H. C. J., Goulson, D.,
Hartley, S., Lampkin, N., Morris, C., Pierzynski, G., Prasad, P. V. V., Pywell, R., Sutherland, W. J.,
Tscharntke, T., & Warwick, H. (2018). Global assessment of agricultural system redesign for sustainable
intensification. Nature Sustainability, 1(8), 441–446. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0114-0
68. Ramakrishnan, P. S. (1992). Shifting agriculture and sustainable development: An interdisciplinary study
from Northeastern India. UNESCO-MAB & Parthenon Publishing Group.
Page 2906
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
69. Rangel-Landa, S., Casas, A., Rivera-Lozoya, E., Torres-García, I., & Vallejo-Ramos, M. (2016). An ap-
proach to understand indigenous management of biodiversity from an evolutionary perspective: The case
of Mixtec biocultural landscapes. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 12(1), Article 10.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-016-0083-4
70. Rao, A. S., & Siddiqui, N. A. (2019). Ethnobotanical survey of fermentation starter plants used by indige-
nous communities of Assam and Meghalaya, Northeast India. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge,
18(4), 729–738.
71. Ray, S. (2025). Promoting resilient, equitable, and nutrition-secure food systems in the Global South. Ob-
server Research Foundation.
72. Reang, D., Nath, A. J., & Das, A. K. (2022). Traditional agroforestry systems and practices of Assam: A
review. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 21(2), 372–381.
73. Rerkasem, K., Lawrence, D., Padoch, C., Schmidt-Vogt, D., Ziegler, A. D., & Bruun, T. B. (2009). Con-
sequences of swidden transitions for crop and fallow biodiversity in Southeast Asia. Human Ecology,
37(3), 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-009-9250-5
74. Richardson, M. (2015). Methods for qualitative reviews 3 and 4: Non-pharmacological interventions for
attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) delivered in school settings. Centre for Reviews and Dis-
semination. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK304061/
75. Sangha, K. K. (2026). Key lessons from Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities' farming systems:
Insights from a global review. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 10, Article 1743959.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2026.1743959
76. Shankar, R. (2025). Barriers and facilitators to nurses' adoption of artificial intelligence-driven solutions
in clinical practice: A protocol for a systematic review of qualitative studies. BMJ Open, 15(8), e099875.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-099875
77. Sharma, U. K., & Pegu, S. (2011). Ethnobotany of religious and supernatural beliefs of the Mising tribes
of Assam with special reference to the “Dobur Uie.Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 7(1),
Article 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-7-16
78. Singh, T. A., Devi, K. R., Ahmed, G., & Jeyaram, K. (2014). Microbial and endogenous origin of fibrino-
lytic activity in traditional fermented foods of Northeast India. Food Research International, 55, 356–362.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2013.11.042
79. Sota, Y., & Tetsuo, M. (2011). Rice fermentation starters in Cambodia: Cultural significance and traditional
production methods. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, 56(2), 175–181.
80. Soundy, A., & Heneghan, N. R. (2022). Meta-ethnography. International Review of Sport and Exercise
Psychology, 15(1), 266–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2021.1966822
81. Steinkraus, K. H. (Ed.). (1995). Handbook of indigenous fermented foods (2nd ed.). Marcel Dekker.
82. Sthapit, B., Rao, V. R., & Sthapit, S. (Eds.). (2016). Tropical fruit tree species and climate change. Biover-
sity International.
83. Surya, A. (2024). Fermented foods of Southeast Asia other than soybean- or seafood-based ones. Journal
of Ethnic Foods, 11, Article 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42779-024-00234-x
84. Tamang, J. P. (2010). Himalayan fermented foods: Microbiology, nutrition, and ethnic values. CRC Press.
85. Tamang, J. P. (2022). Ethno-microbiology of ethnic Indian fermented foods and alcoholic beverages. Jour-
nal of Applied Microbiology, 132(3), 1525–1536. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.15382
86. Tamang, J. P., Shin, D.-H., Jung, S.-J., & Chae, S.-W. (2016). Functional properties of microorganisms in
fermented foods. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, Article 578. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00578
87. Tanimura, W., Sanchez, P. C., & Kozaki, M. (1977). The fermented food in the Philippines. I. Tapuy (rice
wine). Journal of Agricultural Science (Tokyo), 22(1), 118–134.
88. Tengö, M., Hill, R., Malmer, P., Raymond, C. M., Spierenburg, M., Danielsen, F., Elmqvist, T., & Folke,
C. (2017). Weaving knowledge systems in IPBES, CBD and beyond—Lessons learned for sustainability.
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26–27, 17–25.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.10.006
89. Tharmabalan, R. T. (2025). Empowering Orang Asli communities through an integrative approach to sus-
tainable food sovereignty. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 14(2), 1–
18.
90. Toledo, V. M., & Burlingame, B. (2006). Biodiversity and nutrition: A common path toward global food
security and sustainable development. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 19(6–7), 477–483.
Page 2907
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue V, May 2026
91. Tonchaiyaphum, P., Arpornchayanon, W., & Khonsung, P. (2024). Systematic review on traditional fer-
mented rice beverages of Assam: Gastroprotective and biochemical indices. Pharmacognosy Reviews,
18(39), 142–151.
92. Toner, J., Desha, C., Reis, K., Hes, D., & Hayes, S. (2023). Integrating ecological knowledge into regen-
erative design: A rapid practice review. Sustainability, 15(17), Article 13271.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su151713271
93. Tula, M., & Karlsson, B. G. (2024). Resurgent diversity: Upland agriculture, indigenous crops and food-
ways in Eastern Himalayas. Contemporary South Asia, 32(4), 412–428.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09584935.2024.2416433
94. Watanabe, K. (2023). Traditional fermented beverages of Southeast Asian hill tribes and their microbial
ecology: Parallels with Northeast Indian rice wines. Journal of Fermentation, 9(3), Article 211.
https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9030211
95. Yein, J., Pegu, B. K., Sanong, J., Khanikar, N. R., & Pegu, B. (2022). Traditional ethnomedicinal practice
in the homemade alcoholic beverage of the Mising community of Majuli District, Upper Assam. Biosci-
ences, Biotechnology Research Asia, 19(2), 497–500. https://doi.org/10.13005/bbra/3003
96. Yumnam, H., Hazarika, P., & Sharma, I. (2024). Metagenomic insights into traditional fermentation of
rice-based beverages among ethnic tribes in southern Assam, Northeast India. Frontiers in Microbiology,
15, Article 1410098. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1410098
97. Yokoyama, K., & Birchley, S. (2018). Japanese Expatriate Entrepreneurs in Asia: Cases from Myanmar.
European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, (), 876–882, XIII.
98. Zeitler, L., Rahut, D. B., & Boëte, C. (2025). Protected areas and indigenous diets in Southeast Asia: Does
proximity and level of protection matter? People and Nature, 7(1), 214–228.
https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.70145
99. Zhu, Y., Chen, H., Fan, J., Wang, Y., Li, Y., Chen, J., Fan, J., Yang, S., Hu, L., Leung, H., Mew, T. W.,
Teng, P. S., Wang, Z., & Mundt, C. C. (2000). Genetic diversity and disease control in rice. Nature,
406(6797), 718–722. https://doi.org/10.1038/35021046