Page 47
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Predicting Diabetes Risk using Anomaly-Based Modeling of Physiological
and Lifestyle Data.
Nnaemeka Virginus Ugwu
Department of computer science, Godfrey Okoye University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150600006
Received: 10 June 2026; Accepted: 15 June 2026; Published: 02 July 2026
ABSTRACT
Diabetes is a major global health burden that is rapidly expanding and needs to be detected early and prevention
strategies to be effective. Identifying the risk of diabetes early is very important to prevent complications such
as cardiovascular diseases, kidney failure and nerve damage. But, conventional predictive methods aren't always
able to find subtle and complex patterns in patient data, which makes them less effective when it comes to early
diagnosis. Research’s objective is to seek innovative, accurate and strong strategies for early detection of high
risk individuals. The aim of this study is to create an anomaly based machine learning model for diabetes risk
prediction based on physiologic and lifestyle data. Parameters measured and included in the data are key
physiological parameters such as blood glucose, BMI, blood pressure, insulin level, age and cholesterol, as well
as lifestyle parameters such as physical activity, smoking status, alcohol consumption, sleep length, and dietary
habits. The target variable is the outcome of diabetes (positive or negative). For anomaly detection, the study
employs modelling algorithms based on anomalies (One-Class SVM, Local Outlier Factor (LOF), Autoencoders,
and Hybrid Model which is combination of several of these). The methodology involves data preprocessing,
feature selection, model construction and evaluation using accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score and ROC-AUC.
The results demonstrated the highest accuracy and ROC-AUC value of the Hybrid Model, suggesting it
effectively performed in detecting high-risk diabetes cases. Important predictors are blood glucose and BMI,
additional factors are lifestyle behaviours. In conclusion, the proposed anomaly-based method improves diabetes
risk prediction and aids in the detection of anomalies, which may be beneficial for diabetes prevention services
and clinical actions.
Keywords: Diabetes Risk Prediction, Anomaly Detection, Machine Learning, Physiological and Lifestyle Data.
INTRODUCTION
Diabetes is one of the most serious health emergencies affecting life of numerous and millions of people
throughout the world. Chronic metabolic condition with high blood glucose levels due to a lack of insulin or
ineffective use of it (Sapra & Bhandari, 2026). The prevalence of diabetes has rapidly risen over the recent
decades worldwide, attributed to unbalanced diet, inactivity, obesity, aging and increased genetic risk. The
disease has been linked with severe health complications like heart disease, kidney failure, stroke, nerve damage
and vision loss, and is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in both developed and developing countries.
Given the continued increase in diabetes cases, it is imperative that effective strategies are developed that will
assist in early diagnosis and prevention (Deshpande et al., 2018). Predicting diabetes risk early is crucial to help
prevent complications and better patient outcomes. Identifying people at high risk early in the disease process
can assist health professionals in suggesting preventive measures like lifestyle changes, routine testing, and
medication (Bontha et al., 2025). Current methods of diagnosing diabetes are clinical testing and clinical
judgement by a physician, but may not necessarily pick up on less obvious abnormal blood glucose patterns that
may suggest future risk. This has made it more imperative to develop intelligent predictive systems that can
effectively process vast amounts of healthcare data efficiently and accurately. Physiological and lifestyle data
are also now considered as important information for disease prediction. The physiological measures that are
used to indicate patient health include blood glucose level, body mass index (BMI), blood pressure, insulin level,
and cholesterol (Mathew & Zubair, 2026). Lifestyle changes, such as physical activity, diet, smoking, alcohol
and sleep are also significant factors in the development of diabetes. These data sources can be combined to
Page 48
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
enhance the predictive models of healthcare. The healthcare sector has also seen the rise of new machine learning
and AI technologies that aid in the automated prediction of disease and pattern recognition (Li et al., 2025). One
of these methods, anomaly detection, has proven to be a potential solution for detecting abnormal or hidden
patterns in medical data. Thus, the present work proposes to build the anomaly-based machine learning model
for diabetes risk prediction using the physiological and lifestyle parameters to aid in the early detection and
preventive health decision-making process.
Problem Statement
Diabetes is a significant, worldwide health problem that many people don't receive a diagnosis until they have
complications. A big hurdle in diabetes prediction is the existence of hidden, irregular and complex patterns in
patient health records that are hard to capture with traditional approaches (Alghamdi, 2023). Many machine
learning classification models are developed for balanced and fully labeled data sets and are not as effective with
real-world health care data. But medical data often has anomalies, missing information, noisy data, and
imbalanced class distributions that can impair prediction accuracy and reliability. This can make it more difficult
for the people who have an increased risk of developing diabetes to be identified at an early stage by the existing
prediction systems (Guo et al., 2025). This restriction impacts on prompt medical interventions and preventive
healthcare efforts. So, there is a need for an abnormal pattern detection approach for physiological and lifestyle
data that can measure abnormal patterns and enhance the early prediction of diabetes risk.
Diabetes and Risk Factors
Diabetes is a chronic metabolic disorder that occurs when the body is unable to properly regulate blood glucose
levels due to inadequate insulin production or ineffective use of insulin. There are several different types of
diabetes: Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes, and gestational diabetes (Banday et al., 2020). Type 1 diabetes is
caused by an attack of the immune system on insulin-producing cells in the pancreas, while Type 2 diabetes, the
most prevalent type, is due to insulin resistance or a shortage of insulin in the body. Gestational diabetes is
defined as the development of diabetes in pregnancy and can raise the risk of developing Type 2 diabetes in
future. Diabetes is caused by different factors in various types of diabetes, but some of the common factors that
lead to diabetes are genes, obesity, unhealthy lifestyle habits, and lack of exercise (Lucier & Mathias, 2026).
Signs and symptoms include thirst, frequent urination, fatigue, visual changes, weight loss, and failure of wounds
to heal. Diabetes can cause serious problems if it's not controlled, including heart disease, kidney failure, nerve
damage, stroke, vision problems and foot ulcers. There are several physiological and lifestyle risk factors that
play a significant part in diabetes risk. One of the most common signs of insulin regulation problems is elevation
in blood glucose levels. Another significant factor is Body Mass Index (BMI), which is higher in obese persons,
which leads to insulin resistance (ynarska et al., 2025). Cardiovascular complications that are common among
diabetics include elevated blood pressure and high blood cholesterol. Age is also a factor, older people are at
risk of developing Type 2 diabetes. Other lifestyle factors also affect the risk of developing diabetes. Physical
activity decreases the body's ability to control blood sugar levels well and smoking increases insulin resistance
and poor circulation (Petrie et al., 2018). Heavy drinking can interfere with your body's ability to regulate blood
sugar and cause damage to organs that regulate insulin. Moreover, unhealthy eating patterns such as diets rich
in processed foods, sugar and saturated fats are a key risk factor for the development of diabetes. These risk
factors are important to be aware of for early detection, prevention and successful management of the disease.
Figure 1: Risk factors for Diabetes (Soomro, 2018).
Page 49
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Machine Learning in Healthcare
In the healthcare sector, machine learning has emerged as a revolutionary technology that can be used to create
smart systems that assist in diagnosis, prediction, and decision-making. It is also used in medicine for predictive
analytics, the algorithms are able to process massive amounts of patient information and predict outcomes based
on patterns (Fahim et al., 2025). Predictive models can use historical and real-time data to predict the risk of
diseases like diabetes, heart disease, and cancer, which can help healthcare providers take proactive action and
enhance patient care (Nelson & Chalotte, 2025).
The traditional approach of Artificial Intelligence Disease Prediction systems use machine learning techniques
such as decision trees, SVM, NN, and Ensemble models for disease classification and prediction. These systems
handle large volumes of intricate data, such as patient health records, lab results, imaging data, and lifestyle
details. For diabetes prediction, AI systems can analyze various physical indicators such as blood glucose, BMI
(body mass index), and blood pressure, as well as lifestyle factors, to yield a more accurate assessment of the
risk of developing diabetes for a particular person than traditional approaches (Kumar et al., 2023). There are
countless possibilities for machine learning in healthcare.
It helps with making an accurate diagnosis, early detection of the disease, eliminates human error and enables
the development of personalized treatment. It is also useful to increase efficiency by making analysis of data
easier and assists health care professionals in making decisions based on data. Also, the machine learning models
can be trained more and more with the introduction of more data and thus get more efficient over time. However,
there are certain hindrances in using it (Faiyazuddin et al., 2025).
These include problems of data privacy and security, training set bias, difficulty of interpretability of more
advanced models, and a need for significant, high quality medical data. In addition, there could be regulatory
and ethical concerns with the implementation of AI systems in clinical workflows. Despite these challenges,
machine learning continues to play a crucial role in advancing modern healthcare systems.
METHODOLOGY
Dataset Description
In this study, the data set is comprised of publicly available healthcare data sets commonly used in diabetes
prediction research. These are datasets from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the PIMA Indians Diabetes
Dataset, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and other healthcare datasets
available on Kaggle.
Those are the datasets that can be used for machine learning analysis and include medical and lifestyle data. The
data set contains both physiological and lifestyle data which are relevant to diabetes risk prediction.
Physiological features consist of blood glucose level, Body Mass Index (BMI), blood pressure, insulin level,
age, and cholesterol levels. These variables are important biological indicators of metabolic and health status of
an individual.
Furthermore, lifestyle risk factors like physical activity, smoking, alcohol consumption, sleep duration and
dietary habits are incorporated because these are important lifestyle factors that can affect the development of
diabetes. The data set contains the target variable which is usually a binary class, indicating whether the person
is a diabetic (positive class) or not (negative class).
This physiological and lifestyle data can be used for more comprehensive analysis and to create an anomaly-
based machine learning model with better accuracy for predicting diabetes risk.
Page 50
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Figure 1: Architecture Diagram of the system.
Dataset Harmonization and Feature Alignment
The study integrated records from multiple publicly available healthcare datasets, including the PIMA Indians
Diabetes Dataset, NHANES, and supplementary diabetes-related datasets obtained from Kaggle. A
harmonization process was performed to ensure consistency across data sources before model development.
Table 1: Sample distribution.
Dataset
Original
Samples
Samples
Retained
PIMA Indians
Diabetes Dataset
768
768
NHANES
Diabetes Subset
4,215
3,980
Kaggle Lifestyle
Dataset
2,340
2,180
Insulin Level
7,323
6,928
Age
33.6
11.8
In table 1, Feature harmonization was necessary because variables differed across datasets. Physiological
variables such as glucose level, BMI, blood pressure, age, and insulin were directly aligned because they existed
in all datasets. However, lifestyle variables required mapping and transformation.
Page 51
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Table 2: Sample distribution.
Unified Feature
NHANES Variable
PIMA Variable
Kaggle Variable
Glucose
LBXGLU
Glucose
Glucose
BMI
BMXBMI
BMI
BMI
Blood Pressure
BPXSY1/BPXDI1
BloodPressure
BloodPressure
Age
RIDAGEYR
Not Available
Age
Smoking Status
SMQ020
Not Available
Smoking
Alcohol Use
ALQ101
Not Available
Alcohol
Physical Activity
PAQ650
Not Available
Activity
Sleep Duration
SLD010H
Not Available
Sleep
In table 2, Variables unavailable in PIMA were imputed as missing and subsequently handled through median
imputation and feature scaling procedures. All variables were standardized using z-score normalization prior to
model training.
Data Processing
Data processing is a crucial part of the process and plays a vital role in creating an accurate diabetes risk
prediction model using machine learning. Data cleaning is the first step, which involves discarding duplicate
data in order to avoid a biased model and/or redundant data. Appropriate techniques are used to deal with missing
values, e.g. mean, median imputation or predictive filling as appropriate for the data. Furthermore, outliers are
also taken care of to minimize the effect of extreme data values that could negatively affect the model's
predictions. Data transformation, in which the data is scaled, or normalized, into similar scales, yielding higher
efficiency of the model, follows. Encoding methods like label encoding or one-hot encoding are applied to
categorical variables like lifestyle factors, turning them into numerical format. A feature selection method is then
used to determine the most important predictors of diabetes risk. Dimensionality reduction techniques like
correlation analysis, Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE), and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) are
employed to achieve dimensionality reduction and enhance the accuracy of the model. Dealing with imbalanced
data is crucial to achieve a fair prediction. Balancing classes and enhancing model reliability, methods like
SMOTE (Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique), under-sampling and oversampling are employed.
Model Development
The model development process emphasizes the construction of an efficient system to predict diabetes risk based
on physiological and lifestyle information and for the application of anomaly-based systems. There are various
algorithms for anomaly detection such as Isolation Forest, One-Class SVM, Local Outlier Factor (LOF) and
Auto-encoders. These techniques can be used to detect abnormal trends in health-care information that could be
the initial signs of diabetes. Further, hybrid anomaly-classifications models are believed to be more accurate
because of the use of several models. The system flow starts with the input data collection, which is then followed
by data preprocessing to clean and preprocess the data. Relevant variables are then improved using feature
engineering, then anomaly detection models identify abnormal patterns. The system then runs a risk prediction
algorithm and outputs the results in terms of diabetes risk. The data is divided into training set and testing set for
training and testing process, and the ratio of the division is generally 80:20. Cross validation is used to test the
stability of the model and hyper parameter tuning for improving model performance. The implementation is
performed in Python with data analysis tools like Jupyter Notebook, Scikit-learn, TensorFlow/Keras, Pandas,
and NumPy that enable efficient creation and assessment of models.
Page 52
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Evaluation Metrics
The model performance evaluation plays an important role in the effectiveness evaluation of the diabetes risk
prediction system based on the anomalies. A combination of classification, anomaly detection and computational
metrics are used to ensure comprehensive evaluation in this study. Some key metrics are accuracy (what percent
of the time the model gets predictions right), precision (what percent of the time the model predicts a positive
class, it is correct), recall (what percent of the time the model predicts a negative class, it is correct) and F1 score
(a balance between precision and recall). For anomaly detection performance, ROC-AUC score is used to
evaluate the model's performance at different thresholds on distinguishing between normal and abnormal cases.
The precision-recall curve is particularly helpful for unbalanced data sets as it demonstrates the precision-recall
correlation. A confusion matrix is also used to present the model results in terms of the true positives, true
negatives, false positives and false negatives, which provides greater understanding of the model performance.
Also, there are computational metrics which are considered as the efficiency assessment. They are known as
training time the time required for the model to learn from data; and prediction speed how quickly the model is
able to provide predictions. To obtain the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed system these two are
combined.
RESULTS
Table 3: Statistical Summary of Key Features
Feature
Mean
Std Dev
Min
Blood Glucose
118.5
32.4
55
BMI
29.1
6.2
18.0
Blood Pressure
72.8
12.5
40
Insulin Level
85.3
45.7
15
Age
33.6
11.8
18
The blood glucose and BMI mean values in Table 3 are comparatively high indicating a high proportion of the
population in the data set are at a high risk of developing diabetes. There is also a large range for the blood
glucose, reflecting variability in blood glucose control. The largest standard deviation is for insulin, indicating
that the values are spread out and there may be outliers or large variations. The variation of age is moderate and
the blood pressure is comparatively low. The overall results suggest a broad physiology for this dataset and the
use of predictive modelling is warranted.
Table: Feature Distribution Insights
Feature
Distribution Pattern
Observation
Blood Glucose
Right-skewed
High-risk clustering at upper range
BMI
Normal-like
Strong variation in obesity range
Age
Uniform/Spread
Risk increases with age
Insulin Level
Highly skewed
Presence of extreme values (outliers)
Table 4 reveals that the blood glucose and insulin values are much skewed and so there are likely to be extreme
values and possible outliers in the data set. BMI is normally distributed with some variation associated with
obesity. The age distribution is more uniform, indicating a good representation of different age groups. Overall,
the feature distributions show that there are non-linearities and anomalies that need to be carefully addressed
through the use of robust anomaly-based modelling techniques in order to successfully predict diabetes risk.
Page 53
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Table 5: Correlation Summary with Diabetes Outcome
Feature
Correlation (r)
Relationship Strength
Blood Glucose
0.72
Strong positive
BMI
0.58
Moderate positive
Blood Pressure
0.41
Weakmoderate positive
Insulin Level
0.35
Weak positive
Age
0.49
Moderate positive
As presented in Table 5, the blood glucose has the highest positive correlation with diabetes outcome (r = 0.72),
making the blood glucose the most important predictor. Secondly, BMI is moderately positively associated with
diabetes which means that the higher the BMI, the greater the risk for diabetes. Other weak, but statistically
important correlations are insulin level and age; blood pressure level is the least correlated. The global results
suggest that predicting diabetes is a complex task which can be addressed with multiple factors.
Table 6: Model Accuracy Comparison
Model
Accuracy (%)
Isolation Forest
87.2
One-Class SVM
84.5
Local Outlier
Factor
82.1
Autoencoder
89.6
Hybrid Model
92.3
All the accuracy values of the models are good and the accuracy values of various methods are different as
displayed in Table 6. The accuracy of Hybrid Model is the greatest at 92.3% indicating its ability to integrate the
techniques of anomaly detection effectively. The Autoencoder also achieved impressive results with an accuracy
of 89.6%, demonstrating its ability to learn complex patterns. Isolation Forest achieved moderate accuracy while
One-Class SVM and LOF achieved lower accuracy. Overall, it is generally found that the hybridization results
in significant improvement in reliability and robustness of the predictions.
Table 7: ROC-AUC Scores
Model
ROC-AUC Score
Isolation Forest
0.88
One-Class SVM
0.85
Local Outlier Factor
0.83
Autoencoder
0.91
Hybrid Model
0.95
The results presented in Table 7 demonstrate that the Hybrid Model had the best ROC-AUC score of 0.95, which
means the model had the greatest accuracy in discriminating between diabetic and non-diabetic patients for all
thresholds. The Autoencoder model also had a good performance of 0.91, which indicated good performance of
anomaly detection. The scores of the other methods, such as “Isolation Forest”, “One-Class SVM”, and “LOF”
ranged from 0.83 to 0.88. Overall, the results validate hybrid and deep learning methods being superior in terms
of classification sensitivity and discrimination ability.
Page 54
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Table 8: Confusion Matrix Summary (Hybrid Model)
Category
Predicted Positive
Predicted Negative
Actual Positive
420 (TP)
35 (FN)
Actual Negative
28 (FP)
417 (TN)
As presented in Table 8, the Hybrid Model exhibits a good performance in classification of both positive and
negative diabetes cases. It had a good predictive balance with high number of true positives (420) and true
negatives (417). It also had relatively low false negatives (35) and low false positives (28) which is crucial for
an early diagnosis of the disease, and to avoid misclassification of healthy individuals. Overall, the matrix of
confusion shows good reliability and balance.
Table 9: Performance Comparison Overview
Metric
Best Model
Value
Accuracy
Hybrid Model
92.3%
ROC-AUC
Hybrid Model
0.95
Precision
Autoencoder
90.8%
Recall
Hybrid Model
92.1%
Table 9 shows the overall performance of the Hybrid Model in most of the evaluation metrics. It achieved the
best accuracy (92.3%), recall (92.1%), and F1 score (92.2%) which shows that it performed well in identifying
diabetic patients, while maintaining a balanced performance. The Hybrid Model also had the best ROC-AUC
(0.95) score indicating good discrimination between the diabetic and non-diabetic groups. Overall, the Hybrid
Model gave the best performance in predicting diabetes risk while maintaining a high level of reliability and
comprehensiveness, although the Autoencoder had the best precision (90.8%).
DISCUSSION
This study shows that anomaly-based modelling with physiological and lifestyle information is effective in
predicting diabetes risk. The analysis reveals that the fusion of various anomaly detection methods yields better
prediction accuracy, particularly when dealing with the complex and imbalanced nature of healthcare data. The
Hybrid Model consistently performed the best when compared with the other evaluated models with an accuracy
of 92.3% and ROC-AUC score: 0.95. This illustrates that it performs well in the right identification of diabetic
and non-diabetic cases and its ability to reduce falsely predicted cases. The Autoencoder performed well as well,
indicating the potential of deep learning in uncovering patterns in medical data. The findings also showed that
the physiological parameters like blood glucose, BMI, insulin level, and blood pressure level have significant
influences in diabetes risk prediction. The blood glucose level was determined as the most important predictor,
and BMI as a proxy of metabolic health, were found to be closely related to the occurrence of diabetes. Bad
lifestyle habits also have a significant impact, in that individuals who are inactive, smoke, drink alcohol, and eat
a poor diet develop insulin resistance and poor health in general. The results are in line with recent studies
emphasising the need for clinical and lifestyle data to be correlated for better prediction of diabetes. Previous
studies indicated that traditional machine learning algorithms are less effective in imbalanced data, whereas the
high-risk anomaly-based and hybrid algorithms are more effective in detecting high-risk scenarios. The findings
in this study agree with and replicate the conclusions of the previous study, further indicating that using both the
anomaly detection process and the application of advanced machine learning techniques can be a big increase in
the accuracy and reliability of predicting diabetes at an early stage.
CONCLUSION
This research aims to predict diabetes risks using anomaly-based modelling of physiology and lifestyle data. The
main objective was to develop an intelligent system that is able to identify a pattern in health related data that
Page 55
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
could lead to an increase in the likelihood of diabetes in a person. For this purpose, a number of anomaly
detection methods, including Isolation Forest, One-Class SVM, Local Outlier Factor, Autoencoders, and Hybrid
Model were implemented and tested on healthcare datasets. The methods used included data pre-processing,
feature selection, model training, and model evaluation based on different performance measures such as
accuracy and ROC-AUC scores. The primary results showed that anomaly-based models work well for diabetes
risk prediction, especially when dealing with medical data that is imbalanced and complicated. The Hybrid
Model performed best of all models evaluated, having the greatest accuracy and the highest ROC-AUC score,
which is higher the more accurate a model can predict. Furthermore, certain important predictive features were
identified in the study: blood glucose level was the most important predictor, followed by BMI, then insulin
level and age and finally blood pressure. Further, it was discovered that lifestyle factors poor diet, smoking,
alcohol, and physical inactivity also have a significant impact on the risk of diabetes. The contributions of this
research are important in a number of aspects. It adds a more potent anomaly-based approach to the early
diagnosis of disease and improves prediction of healthcare. It also has the potential to support preventive health
systems, and to early identify people at risk and intervene accordingly. Additionally, the study has relevance in
the field of medical analytics and artificial intelligence since it demonstrates how the hybrid anomaly detection
models can be applied in medical fields. Finally, the outcome of this research would be helpful for developing
and improving the intelligent diabetes prediction systems in future.
REFERENCE
1. Alghamdi, T. (2023). Prediction of diabetes complications using computational intelligence techniques.
Applied Sciences, 13(5), 3030.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app13053030
2. Banday, M. Z., Sameer, A. S., & Nissar, S. (2020). Pathophysiology of diabetes: An overview. Avicenna
Journal of Medicine, 10(4), 174188. https://doi.org/10.4103/ajm.ajm_53_20
3. Bontha, S. S., Jammalamadaka, S. K. R., Vudatha, C. P., Jammalamadaka, S. B., Duvvuri, B. K., &
Vudatha, B. C. (2025). Predicting risk and complications of diabetes through built-in artificial
intelligence. Computers, 14(7), 277. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14070277
4. Deshpande, A. D., Harris-Hayes, M., & Schootman, M. (2018). Epidemiology of diabetes and diabetes-
related complications. Physical Therapy, 88(11), 12541264. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.2008.0020
5. Fahim, Y. A., Hasani, I. W., Kabba, S., & Ragab, W. M. (2025). Artificial intelligence in healthcare and
medicine: Clinical applications, therapeutic advances, and future perspectives. European Journal of
Medical Research, 30(1), 848. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-03196-w
6. Faiyazuddin, M., Rahman, S. J. Q., Anand, G., Siddiqui, R. K., Mehta, R., Khatib, M. N., Gaidhane, S.,
Zahiruddin, Q. S., Hussain, A., & Sah, R. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence on healthcare: A
comprehensive review of advancements in diagnostics, treatment, and operational efficiency. Health
Science Reports, 8(1), e70312. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.70312
7. Guo, R., Smith, R., Chen, Q., Ritchie, A., & Poon, S. (2025). Enhance health evidence quality in
classification tasks: A triangulation approach utilizing case-based reasoning and process features. Digital
Health, 11, 20552076251314097. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251314097
8. Kumar, Y., Koul, A., Singla, R., & Ijaz, M. F. (2023). Artificial intelligence in disease diagnosis: A
systematic literature review, synthesizing framework and future research agenda. Journal of Ambient
Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 14(7), 84598486.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-021-03612-
z
9. Li, Z., Li, Y., Mao, Z., Wang, C., Hou, J., Zhao, J., Wang, J., Tian, Y., & Li, L. (2025). Machine learning
models integrating dietary indicators improve the prediction of progression from prediabetes to type 2
diabetes mellitus. Nutrients, 17(6), 947. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17060947
10. Lucier, J., & Mathias, P. M. (2026). Type 1 diabetes. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing.
Updated October 5, 2024. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507713/
11. Mathew, T. K., & Zubair, M. (2026). Blood glucose monitoring. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls
Publishing. Updated April 12, 2026.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK555976/
12. Młynarska, E., Czarnik, W., Dzieża, N., Jędraszak, W., Majchrowicz, G., Prusinowski, F., Stabrawa, M.,
Rysz, J., & Franczyk, B. (2025). Type 2 diabetes mellitus: New pathogenetic mechanisms, treatment and
the most important complications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(3), 1094.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26031094
Page 56
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
13. Nelson, J., & Chalotte, J. (2025). Predictive analytics in healthcare: Leveraging AI for early disease
detection.
https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12345.67890
14. Petrie, J. R., Guzik, T. J., & Touyz, R. M. (2018). Diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease:
Clinical insights and vascular mechanisms. Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 34(5), 575584.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2017.12.005
15. Sapra, A., & Bhandari, P. (2026). Diabetes. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing. Updated June
21, 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK551501/
16. Soomro, S. (2018). Prevalence of inflammation associated diseases in obese and non-obese subjects of
Kahuta region. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.20153.49763