
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
could lead to an increase in the likelihood of diabetes in a person. For this purpose, a number of anomaly
detection methods, including Isolation Forest, One-Class SVM, Local Outlier Factor, Autoencoders, and Hybrid
Model were implemented and tested on healthcare datasets. The methods used included data pre-processing,
feature selection, model training, and model evaluation based on different performance measures such as
accuracy and ROC-AUC scores. The primary results showed that anomaly-based models work well for diabetes
risk prediction, especially when dealing with medical data that is imbalanced and complicated. The Hybrid
Model performed best of all models evaluated, having the greatest accuracy and the highest ROC-AUC score,
which is higher the more accurate a model can predict. Furthermore, certain important predictive features were
identified in the study: blood glucose level was the most important predictor, followed by BMI, then insulin
level and age and finally blood pressure. Further, it was discovered that lifestyle factors poor diet, smoking,
alcohol, and physical inactivity – also have a significant impact on the risk of diabetes. The contributions of this
research are important in a number of aspects. It adds a more potent anomaly-based approach to the early
diagnosis of disease and improves prediction of healthcare. It also has the potential to support preventive health
systems, and to early identify people at risk and intervene accordingly. Additionally, the study has relevance in
the field of medical analytics and artificial intelligence since it demonstrates how the hybrid anomaly detection
models can be applied in medical fields. Finally, the outcome of this research would be helpful for developing
and improving the intelligent diabetes prediction systems in future.
REFERENCE
1. Alghamdi, T. (2023). Prediction of diabetes complications using computational intelligence techniques.
Applied Sciences, 13(5), 3030.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app13053030
2. Banday, M. Z., Sameer, A. S., & Nissar, S. (2020). Pathophysiology of diabetes: An overview. Avicenna
Journal of Medicine, 10(4), 174–188. https://doi.org/10.4103/ajm.ajm_53_20
3. Bontha, S. S., Jammalamadaka, S. K. R., Vudatha, C. P., Jammalamadaka, S. B., Duvvuri, B. K., &
Vudatha, B. C. (2025). Predicting risk and complications of diabetes through built-in artificial
intelligence. Computers, 14(7), 277. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14070277
4. Deshpande, A. D., Harris-Hayes, M., & Schootman, M. (2018). Epidemiology of diabetes and diabetes-
related complications. Physical Therapy, 88(11), 1254–1264. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.2008.0020
5. Fahim, Y. A., Hasani, I. W., Kabba, S., & Ragab, W. M. (2025). Artificial intelligence in healthcare and
medicine: Clinical applications, therapeutic advances, and future perspectives. European Journal of
Medical Research, 30(1), 848. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-03196-w
6. Faiyazuddin, M., Rahman, S. J. Q., Anand, G., Siddiqui, R. K., Mehta, R., Khatib, M. N., Gaidhane, S.,
Zahiruddin, Q. S., Hussain, A., & Sah, R. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence on healthcare: A
comprehensive review of advancements in diagnostics, treatment, and operational efficiency. Health
Science Reports, 8(1), e70312. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.70312
7. Guo, R., Smith, R., Chen, Q., Ritchie, A., & Poon, S. (2025). Enhance health evidence quality in
classification tasks: A triangulation approach utilizing case-based reasoning and process features. Digital
Health, 11, 20552076251314097. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251314097
8. Kumar, Y., Koul, A., Singla, R., & Ijaz, M. F. (2023). Artificial intelligence in disease diagnosis: A
systematic literature review, synthesizing framework and future research agenda. Journal of Ambient
Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 14(7), 8459–8486.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-021-03612-
z
9. Li, Z., Li, Y., Mao, Z., Wang, C., Hou, J., Zhao, J., Wang, J., Tian, Y., & Li, L. (2025). Machine learning
models integrating dietary indicators improve the prediction of progression from prediabetes to type 2
diabetes mellitus. Nutrients, 17(6), 947. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17060947
10. Lucier, J., & Mathias, P. M. (2026). Type 1 diabetes. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing.
Updated October 5, 2024. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507713/
11. Mathew, T. K., & Zubair, M. (2026). Blood glucose monitoring. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls
Publishing. Updated April 12, 2026.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK555976/
12. Młynarska, E., Czarnik, W., Dzieża, N., Jędraszak, W., Majchrowicz, G., Prusinowski, F., Stabrawa, M.,
Rysz, J., & Franczyk, B. (2025). Type 2 diabetes mellitus: New pathogenetic mechanisms, treatment and
the most important complications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(3), 1094.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26031094