Page 131
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
The Price–Experience Trade-off in Organized Retail: A Comparative
Study of Consumer Satisfaction, Store Choice, and Brand Advocacy
in D-Mart and Competing Retail Chains
Daniel Glance Danny
1*
, Dr. K. Pradeep Reddy
2
1
Research Scholar, School of Commerce
2
Professor, School of Management
1,2
Sanjeev Agrawal Global Educational (SAGE) University, Bhopal, India
*
Corresponding Author
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150600012
Received: 05 June 2026; Accepted: 10 June 2026; Published: 02 July 2026
ABSTRACT
Consumer preferences, satisfaction, and store choice factors of organized retail in Bhopal were the subjects of
this study. Using a descriptive research design, primary survey data was collected and analysed at various levels
to compare the prominent discount retailer, D-Mart, with alternative retailers. The results indicate that D-Mart's
strong preference in the market is due to both aggressive pricing and product mix but does not correlate with a
commitment to brand loyalty (high overall recommendation scores). There were operational bottlenecks that
created friction between customers (crowd control/billing). Therefore, the cost-experience trade-off suggests that
even though value-based pricing would attract customers and ultimately drive sales, for continued customer
loyalty businesses will need to find a combination of affordability with the operational excellence of providing
enhanced customer experiences. This study suggests that the increasing importance of experience-driven
variables affects how customers view and recommend products and services to others. This research extends
knowledge on organized retail by examining Tier-2 urban markets rather than larger metropolitan markets.
Retailers should be aware of the implications for their ability to provide both a low-cost and exceptional service
or customer-centric operation.
Keywords: Organized Retail, Consumer Satisfaction, Store Choice, D-Mart, Brand Advocacy, Customer
Loyalty, Price–Experience Trade-off, Consumer Behaviour.
INTRODUCTION
Background of the Study
Retail is an essential link between producers and final consumers in the current economy. In India, the evolution
of retail has been tremendous, as the retail industry has shifted from traditional methods (such as “Kirana” stores
in unorganised markets) into streamlined and standardised formats with branded supermarkets, hypermarkets
and discount retailing (Sinha & Banerjee, 2004). The change toward organised retailing has occurred due to
rapid urbanisation, increased awareness of digitisation, increased consumer purchasing power and an increased
demand from consumers for convenience, variety and affordable prices (Mukherjee et al., 2011). Modern
retailing in India is composed of a unique dual structure. Developing markets such as India feature two distinct
forms of modern retailing in the market. There is the traditional, unorganised sector — including local
convenience shops and street vendors — and then there are corporations engaged in the modern, organised sector
— there are also large retailers which may operate on a global basis (e.g., Walmart) — either through their own
stores or through their subsidiaries (Reardon et al., 2003). With the increased reliance on digital ecosystems
through high-speed networks connecting many Consumers through eCommerce, the Consumer has come to
Page 132
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
expect significantly higher levels of cleanliness, systematic billing processes, transparent pricing policies and
ethics in pricing (Kotler et al., 2022; Verhoef et al., 2015).
As a result, purchasing patterns are transitioning from credit-based transactions with local businesses to more
systematic, value-driven purchasing environments (Prasad & Aryasri, 2011). Bhopal, the capital of Madhya
Pradesh, is a key urban consumption hub and a city where this retail transformation is occurring. This area is
becoming an increasing target for market researchers and retailers due to its significant middle class demographic
population, large student population and the increasing number of dual income households that reside in the
capital. D-Mart (run by Avenue Supermarts Limited), which is one of the many retail chains in Bhopal, is
garnering considerable attention through their everyday-low-cost (EDLC) and everyday-low-price (EDLP)
formats (Hoch et al., 1994), having leveraged all of their operational and structural savings from visual
merchandising onto the Consumers. Yet, there are many competitors within Bhopal that are challenging D-Mart's
dominance using a variety of different business strategies, such as superior customer service, digital loyalty
programs or superior spatial aesthetics to entice Consumers to their stores. (Mukherjee et al., 2011).
Statement of the Problem
In Bhopal, there is a wide variety of options when it comes to grocery and household item shopping. Because of
this variety and the need for Bhopal consumers to determine price vs. convenience when making a purchase, it
can be challenging for them to choose an option to purchase an item from. D-Mart is one of the dominant players
within the organized retail sector, but there is apparent tension around the desire to drive prices to the lowest
level possible, balanced with providing a satisfactory level of service to the customer. High-volume discount
retailers often face operational hurdles that include crowded/over-crowded aisles, excessive wait times, and little
or no assistance from staff in the store. It is very important to understand how much the presence of these
operational hurdles impacts customer loyalty and the potential for active brand ambassadors. It also remains
unclear whether consumers are willing to overlook these operational barriers in exchange for significant price
savings.
Objectives of the Study
1. To construct a demographic profile of organized retail shoppers in a Tier-2 urban setting.
2. To isolate and analyse the primary determinants driving retail store selection.
3. To comparatively evaluate consumer satisfaction across operational dimensions (value, assortment,
service environment) between D-Mart and rival chains.
4. To assess the impact of operational stressors (e.g., waiting times, crowd density) on overall store
advocacy and recommendation likelihood.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Conceptual Review
“Organized retail” refers to the large, commercialized stores we see in malls, shopping centers and other
traditional retail outlets. They are regulated by the government through laws and regulations and also have
professional management practices, clearly identified by brand name and/or logo, and have generally uniform
operational policies. They typically have a structured physical environment; use a consistent, publicly available
pricing system; and use a defined assortment of merchandise categories to drive sales. Organized retail has
changed the way in which consumers purchase products from an independent/storefront retailer to an organized
retailer. Consumers now choose to purchase from organized retailers primarily because they are providing a
more reliable and convenient shopping environment than independent/storefront retailers. In the organized
shopping environment, a consumer will be influenced not only by price, but also by their perception of value,
convenience, accessibility, product variety, and overall shopping experience. Unlike an independent/storefront,
where the consumer has built a level of trust through personal interaction and/or relationship with the owner or
Page 133
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
shopkeeper, the consumer builds their trust of an organized retail store through product assortment consistency,
fixed pricing policies, and the overall cleanliness and maintenance of the store. Given that modern consumers
are increasingly judging the overall total value of a store based on the entire experience (monetary cost, time
spent, efforts expended, and satisfaction derived) associated with making a purchase, factors such as cleanliness,
availability of products, customer service, checkout efficiency, store ambiance, available parking, and crowding
could all play important roles in the consumer’s ultimate satisfaction with the store. While the majority of
consumers are still attracted by lower prices, many modern consumers are also seeking a total experience that
emphasizes the balance of price versus convenience and quality of service. If retailers fail to meet consumer
expectations along any of these dimensions, they may see lower levels of consumer satisfaction and loyalty, even
if they offer products at lower prices. Thus, the evolving consumer mindset supports the multidimensional nature
of value and highlights that organized retailing must provide both economic (monetary) and experiential benefits.
Review of Recent Studies
Research studies carried out recently have shown evidence that Indian consumers are becoming more reliant on
organized retail formats due to their perceived ability to deliver both financial savings and regular quality
(Mukherjee et al., 2011; Prasad & Aryasri, 2011). Price-sensitive consumers tend to use discount format stores
as their shopping choice, particularly in urban and semi-urban markets (Prasad & Aryasri, 2011; Sinha &
Banerjee, 2004). Furthermore, younger consumers are willing to experiment with new modern retail formats and
place great importance on selection breadth, as well as efficiency within the shopping experience. In addition,
the current retail literature has highlighted the increasing emphasis on the entire customer experience. While
price is usually the primary motivator for purchasing at a specific retailer, there are several other variables that
will influence a customer's intention to repurchase, including the store's physical environment; billing ease; and
ease of navigation (Baker at al., 1994; Turley & Milliman, 2000; Bitner, 1992; Pantano & Gandini, 2018).
Once again, the issue of density within stores — in combination with long checkout lines — leads to decreased
satisfaction with a store despite it being known for its low prices. Research on organized retail in India indicates
that discount retail chains are widely recognized for competitive pricing and value-oriented merchandise,
whereas competing retailers often differentiate themselves through convenience, store ambience, and service
quality (Sinha & Banerjee, 2004; Mukherjee et al., 2011). Ultimately, both cognitive and emotional assessments
play a large role in influencing whether someone will recommend shopping at a specific location. As an example,
an individual may find great value in purchasing items at a discount, but do not want to recommend that store if
their physical experience in that store is extremely difficult.
Research Gap
While Tier-1 metropolitan cities like Delhi, Mumbai, Bangalore and Chennai have been the focus of much
previous research into organized retail, there is little empirical evidence on consumer behaviour in Tier-2 cities.
The emphasis of most previous studies has been primarily on factors such as retail format preference, service
quality and customer satisfaction; however, little attention has been directed towards the consumer's trade-off
between financial benefits and the experience of shopping. The unique characteristics of developing urban
markets – i.e., varying income levels, price sensitivity and changing retail expectations – have similarly not been
adequately investigated. Very little exists in terms of research that analyses operational elements including crowd
management, billing efficiency, store cleanliness, staff responsiveness, etc., in relation to store selection or
consumer advocacy. Consequently, this research aims to fill these gaps by examining the factors affecting store
selection and satisfaction in Bhopal (a Tier-2 city in India), with the primary focus on consumer perceptions of
balancing retail operational quality with their assessment of the economic advantages of shopping at those stores.
The organized retail sector of India is rapidly evolving, and competitors are attempting to distinguish themselves
from one another by implementing low-cost retail strategies as well as making operational improvements to
increase both quality of service and the satisfaction level of customers. The role of operational characteristics as
an influencing factor in Consumer Satisfaction, and as part of the total experience of consumers at a retail
establishment, is not clear. Unfortunately, there has been limited empirical research comparing D-Mart to other
retailers within the same Tier 2 City to provide reasonable guidance regarding the role that both Economic Value
Page 134
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
and Operational Quality play in a consumer's selection of where to shop for goods and how these factors
contribute to the Overall Consumer Experience. In order to complete a comprehensive evaluation of both D-
Mart's performance and the performance of other competitive retailers; the present study provides empirical data
regarding how customers evaluate their decisions of where to shop using both Operational and Economic Value
arguments. In addition, the results of this study will provide retail managers with useful information in the design
of their customer-focused strategies, leading to improved Consumer Satisfaction and sustained competitive
advantage in growing urban sites.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Research Design and Sampling
A descriptive research design is used in the current study to explore consumer attitudes, preferences, and
perceptions toward retail chains in Bhopal. This descriptive study utilized primary data collected from 2026
through a structured questionnaire. A non-probability convenience sampling approach was utilized which
resulted in a final sample of 218 respondents.
Hypotheses
H1: Primary store choice drivers significantly vary depending on the specific retail chain a consumer
frequents.
H2: Consumers perceive significant differences in core operational factors (product variety, staff
behaviour, cleanliness, and crowd management) between D-Mart and competing retail formats.
H3: There is no significant difference in brand advocacy (overall recommendation score) between
frequent shoppers of D-Mart and shoppers of competing chains.
H4: Demographic variables, specifically age and household income, significantly moderate overall
customer recommendation scores for organized retail chains.
Limitations of the Study
The limitations of this study are that the sample consisted only of individuals who participated in a convenience
sample in Bhopal, India therefore; it may not be possible to generalize these findings beyond local residents. The
majority of respondents were between 18 and 25 years of age, which may not reflect younger individuals who
have the ability to move from their hometown to find work.
The study used self-reported data via structured questionnaires that carry potential for response bias and/or social
desirability bias; In addition, this research was cross-sectional, meaning that consumers' perception of stores was
only captured at one point in time, rendering it unable to reflect changes in their shopping behaviour and/or
preferences over time, nor did the study address the differences between D Mart's operations versus competitors
in relation specifically to Bhopal's geographical environment since infrastructure, consumer demographics, and
dynamics within these other cities/areas may provide differing results. Future studies could benefit from
implementing probability sampling methods (as opposed to convenience), sampling larger and geographically
diverse populations and using longitudinal research design methods in order to enhance generalisability and
validity of results.
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
Demographic Profile
Analysing the sample shows that almost three out of four participants are between 18 and 25 years old (76.61%).
Therefore, the results will be dominated by feedback from young people and early careers that are very aware
of prices and frequently compare values across multiple retailers. The changing nature of retailing can be viewed
Page 135
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
through the lens of the demographic composition of organized retailers. With the increased purchasing power of
Generation Z, it is evident that these consumers are having an impact on retail shopping behaviour, as evidenced
by the increase in vigour with which they respond to price discounts, promotions and product availability when
purchasing products from various retail locations. Therefore, this information is critical to retailers who are
targeting consumers that are value-oriented and digitally oriented.
Figure 1
Age Distribution of Survey Respondents
Note. The sample is predominantly youth-skewed, with the 18–25 demographic representing 76.61% of the total
valid responses (N = 218).
Table 4.1: Monthly Household Income of Respondents
Income Group (INR)
Frequency
Percentage (%)
Below 25,000
85
39.17%
25,000–50,000
47
21.66%
50,001–1,00,000
34
15.67%
Above 1,00,000
30
13.82%
Missing
21
9.68%
Total
217
100.00%
(Note: Excludes 1 anomalous unclassifiable text entry)
Page 136
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
The income distribution shows a robust presence of lower and middle-income households, perfectly aligning
with the target market of discount-driven hypermarkets.
Retail Chain Preferences and Store Choice Drivers
Table 4.2: Retail Chain Most Frequently Visited
Retail Chain
Frequency
Percentage (%)
D-Mart
153
70.18%
Reliance Smart / Smart Bazaar
22
10.09%
Star Market / Local Supermarkets
20
9.17%
Vishal Mega Mart
9
4.13%
Missing
14
6.42%
Total
218
100.00%
Figure 2
Most Frequently Visited Retail Chain in Bhopal
Note. The data illustrates a strong market concentration, with D-Mart capturing the significant majority (70.18%)
of frequent store visitations compared to alternative retail formats (N = 218).
Page 137
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
D-Mart has a clear lead in the Bhopal area, where it accounts for more than 70% of all people who go there
regularly. The responses from shoppers as to why they shop at a certain store were overwhelmingly in favour of
"Low Prices / Discounts" and "Variety of Products" - 78 respondents each. The next best reasons were 'Proximity
to Home' (27 respondents) and 'Store Ambience' (18 respondents).
Hypothesis Testing
Testing H1: Store Selection Drivers
A Chi-square test of independence was conducted to examine the relationship between the primary reason for
store selection and the most frequently visited retail chain.
Result: χ² = 21.015, p = 0.0126.
Inference: The hypothesis of "No relationship" was rejected, indicating a statistically significant
association between consumers' primary store selection drivers and the retail chain they most frequently
visit. D-Mart experiences a dramatically larger share of consumers whose main drivers of selection are
price and product selection as compared to competing retail chains, which tend to have more consumers
coming from the closeness of the store to their home or its atmosphere than price and product selection.
The findings of this study illustrate how consumers select stores based upon different criteria and how
important it is to develop retail strategies that align with the specific value proposition from your target
consumers.
Testing H2: Consumer Perceptions (D-Mart vs. Others)
Independent samples t-tests evaluated consumer perceptions of D-Mart against other chains.
Table 4.3: T-Test Results for Consumer Perceptions
Attribute
t-statistic
p-value
Conclusion
Product Variety
3.91
< 0.001
Significant difference
Staff Behaviour
2.1
0.037
Significant difference
Cleanliness
2.89
0.004
Significant difference
Crowd Management
2.07
0.04
Significant difference
Inference: The null hypothesis is rejected across all four operational attributes. The results indicate
statistically significant differences in consumers' perceptions of D-Mart's operational environment
compared with competing retail chains.
Statistical analysis indicated that the null hypothesis was rejected across all four operational attributes examined.
Consumers perceived D-Mart's operational environment to be significantly different from that of competing
retail chains, demonstrating that operational characteristics play a significant role in shaping evaluations of
organized retail stores. The findings further indicate that consumers assess retail stores based on both economic
value and operational quality. While competitive pricing remains an important determinant of store choice,
operational excellence enhances the shopping experience, customer satisfaction, and store preference. Therefore,
retailers should combine value-based pricing with operational excellence to strengthen customer loyalty and
achieve a sustainable competitive advantage.
Figure 3
Mean Consumer Perception Scores: D-Mart vs. Competitors
Page 138
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Note. Mean perception scores are measured on a 4-point scale (where 1 = Poor/Dissatisfied and 4 =
Excellent/Much Better). Independent samples t-tests confirmed that D-Mart scored significantly higher across
all four measured operational dimensions (p < .05).
Testing H3: Overall Recommendation Scores
An independent samples t-test compared the brand advocacy (out of 10) of frequent D-Mart shoppers versus
those who frequent other stores.
Result: t = -0.016, p = 0.987.
Inference: The null hypothesis was not rejected, indicating no statistically significant difference in
overall recommendation ratings between frequent D-Mart shoppers and shoppers of competing retail
chains. Although D-Mart attracts more customers through its competitive pricing and value proposition,
these advantages did not translate into higher customer advocacy or recommendation.
Table 4.4: Recommendation Score Summary
Metric
Value
Valid Sample Size
203
Mean Recommendation Score
5.58
Median Recommendation
Score
5
(Note: Score based on a 1-10 scale)
Testing H4: Influence of Demographic Factors
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) tested the influence of demographics on recommendation scores.
Page 139
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Age: F = 2.53, p = 0.042
Income: F = 4.37, p = 0.005
Inference: The null hypothesis is rejected. Both age and income significantly influence how highly
consumers recommend an organized retail store, with high-income brackets demonstrating different
loyalty thresholds than lower-income cohorts.
Operational Frictions and The Experience Trade-off
Correlation analysis among key satisfaction factors has identified structural correlations across operational
attributes. Strong positive correlations exist between Cleanliness and Staff Behaviour (r = 0.361) and Product
Variety and Crowd Management (r = 0.312). Interestingly, when reviewing these operational metrics
individually, the correlation between their rating and the final Recommendation Score has a near-zero linear
correlation. Thus, it suggests that there is an emotional complexity to the evaluation of customer advocacy that
is not merely based on individual in-store attributes. Although qualitative sentiment and data indicate that D-
Mart is the perceived leader in terms of discounts and product variety, the presence of significant crowd
management difficulties and long wait times at billing counters highlights a massive “cost vs. experience” trade-
off. Since many customers experience such intense operational stressors from a retail outlet with high volume
sales, however, such operational challenges may negatively influence customers' willingness to recommend D-
Mart.
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS
Conclusion
D-Mart has an impressive competitive edge in the organized retail sector in Bhopal, based mainly on a
combination of competitive pricing and a wide variety of products offered. Consumers that shop in this Tier-2
city are extremely economic rational and will choose to purchase things based on lower cost than premium
appearance, further solidifying D-Mart's low-cost business model. However, this research identifies one major
point of vulnerability for D-Mart; although they offer a great value proposition, it does not ensure that customers
are loyal to and will advocate for the D-Mart brand. D-Mart received an overall recommendation rating of only
5.58 out of 10. This suggests that the significant operational challenges at D-Mart (i.e., crowding within the
stores and long lines to checkout) can negatively impact the overall shopping experience. Therefore, shoppers
tend to view D-Mart as a utility service provider, rather than a favoured brand. Customers only visit to save
money, however their experience results in reluctance to recommend the store. Because of this, organized
discount retailers need to implement strategies that will allow them to maintain a competitive position in the
market. They need to find the right balance between absolute affordability and providing basic levels of
operational excellence in their stores. Consumers choose D-Mart for value, but they recommend retailers for
experience; therefore, sustainable retail success depends on balancing affordability with operational excellence.
Suggestions for Retail Managers
1. Re-engineer Billing Efficiency: The checkout line often makes shoppers feel exhausted, retailers should
consider using a dynamic queue management system, and use mPOS card readers in peak hours, and
have a dedicated express line for customers with small purchases.
2. Optimize Crowd Flow: High footfall shouldn't feel claustrophobic. Reevaluating store layouts to
implement one-way aisles in high-demand grocery sections can prevent bottlenecks and improve
physical comfort.
3. Capitalize on Youth Demographics: With Gen Z consumers aged 18-25 being the most significant
segment of customers visiting retail stores, retailers must incorporate technology-driven solutions into
their locations, such as mobile apps that enable instant payment through bar code scans, so that they can
streamline their payment process and decrease the need for physical cash registers. Retailers who
Page 140
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
implement and adopt these types of self-service payment applications will have fewer traditional
checkout stations in their stores.
4. Targeted Advocacy Building: When it comes to retail management, deep discounting isn't enough for
generating high recommendation rates, so managers need to also make an investment in 'delight factors'.
An example would be rapidly recovering from a service failure. By providing clearer overhead signage
to make it easier for customers to navigate the store and by being proactive and restocking shelves before
they run out, the cognitive perception of the brand can change from 'cheap' to 'valuable and reliable'.
REFERENCES
1. Baker, J., Grewal, D., & Parasuraman, A. (1994). The influence of store environment on quality inferences
and store image. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22(4), 328–339.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070394224002
2. Berman, B., Evans, J. R., & Chatterjee, P. (2022). Retail Management: A Strategic Approach. Pearson.
3. Bitner, M. J. (1992). Servicescapes: The impact of physical surroundings on customers and employees.
Journal of Marketing, 56(2), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252042
4. Cronin, J. J., Brady, M. K., & Hult, G. T. M. (2000). Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer
satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments. Journal of Retailing, 76(2), 193–
218. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(00)00028-2
5. Hoch, S. J., Drèze, X., & Purk, M. E. (1994). EDLP, hi-lo, and margin arithmetic. Journal of Marketing,
58 (4), 16–27.
6. Kotler, P., Keller, K. L., & Chernev, A. (2022). Marketing Management. Pearson.
7. Levy, M., Weitz, B., & Grewal, D. (2023). Retailing Management. McGraw-Hill.
8. Mukherjee, A., Satija, D., Goyal, T. M., Mantrala, M. K., & Zou, S. (2011). Are Indian consumers brand
conscious? Insights for global retailers. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 23(3), 284–299.
9. Pantano, E., & Gandini, A. (2018). Exploring the forms of sociality mediated by innovative technologies
in retail settings. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 367–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.012
10. Prasad, C. J., & Aryasri, A. R. (2011). Effect of shopper attributes on retail format choice behaviour for
food and grocery retailing in India. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 39(1),
68–86.
11. Reardon, T., Timmer, C. P., Barrett, C. B., & Berdegué, J. (2003). The rise of supermarkets in Africa,
Asia, and Latin America. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85(5), 1140–1146.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2003.00520.x
12. Sinha, P. K., & Banerjee, A. (2004). Store choice behaviour in an evolving market. International Journal
of Retail & Distribution Management, 32(10), 482–494.
13. Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item
scale. Journal of Retailing, 77(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00041-0
14. Turley, L. W., & Milliman, R. E. (2000). Atmospheric effects on shopping behavior: A review of the
experimental evidence. Journal of Business Research, 49(2), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-
2963(99)00010-7
15. Verhoef, P. C., Kannan, P. K., & Inman, J. J. (2015). From multi-channel retailing to omni-channel
retailing: Introduction to the special issue on multi-channel retailing. Journal of Retailing, 91(2), 174–
181.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2015.02.005
