Page 1347
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Minimizing Mobile and Wireless Electronic Nuisance in Classes and
Affiliated Malpractices in Examination Centres Through a Tri-Band
Detection System
Engr. Ilupeju Akinola M
1
, Engr.Mrs, Oyediji. F.T.
2
, Aliyu Abdulaziz Bello
3
1&2
Department of Computer Engineering, Federal Polytechnic Ile-Oluji, Nigeria
3
Department of Computer Science, Federal Polytechnic Ile-Oluji, Nigeria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150600096
Received: 25 June 2026; Accepted: 30 June 2026; Published: 09 July 2026
ABSTRACT
This research outlines the creation of a tri-band radio-frequency (RF) detection and monitoring system aimed at
addressing the increasing abuse of mobile phones and other wireless electronic gadgets in classrooms and exam
venues. The system employs a passive detection method to ensure compliance with regulatory standards while
safeguarding vital communication services, especially during emergencies. The system constantly monitors the
surroundings to identify RF signals from devices functioning within the cellular, Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth
frequencies. Detected signals are analyzed using parameters such as Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI),
spectral occupancy, and temporal features to enable precise categorization of wireless activity. The hardware
setup includes a microcontroller system, NRF24 transceiver modules for detecting 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi and Bluetooth,
and a 1N34A germanium diode-based RF detector for sensing cellular signals in the 900 MHz to 2.4 GHz
spectrum. A TFT display interface, along with an alert system, enables real-time tracking and alerts. The system
is developed to encompass standard classroom and exam hall settings (150 to 450 m²) and accommodates
adjustable sensitivity and time-controlled functionality. Experimental findings showed that Wi-Fi signals display
consistent behavior, Bluetooth signals manifest as sporadic spikes, and cellular signals present as burst
transmissions, facilitating dependable classification. The proposed solution provides an affordable, flexible, and
unobtrusive system for improving academic honesty and minimizing wireless examination misconduct.
Keywords: Transceiver, Germanium diode, Radio frequency, RSSI, Detector
INTRODUCTION
The growing presence and misuse of wireless-enabled devices in classrooms and examination settings pose a
serious threat to academic discipline and integrity. Current solutions are often inadequate, as they cannot reliably
detect and classify multiple types of wireless signals in real time without introducing interference. This highlights
the need for a cost-effective, intelligent RF monitoring system that can accurately distinguish among wireless
technologies and provide actionable insights for academic authorities. Furthermore, the widespread adoption of
devices such as smartphones, tablets, and wearable technologies in educational settings has intensified these
challenges, making effective monitoring and control mechanisms increasingly essential. Studies show that
ubiquitous wireless connectivity in educational settings often leads to distraction, reduced student engagement
(Eserinune, 2015), and potential misuse, particularly during assessments when unauthorized communication
may occur (Educause Review, 2009; Elma Fe E. Gupit). While wireless-enabled devices can enhance learning
when appropriately regulated, their unregulated use is widely acknowledged as a significant source of distraction
and academic misconduct, thereby necessitating effective monitoring and control strategies. Students
increasingly exploit these technologies during examinations to gain unfair advantages by accessing unauthorized
materials, notes, or digital resources (Nyamawe & Mtonyole; Madara & Namango, 2016). In addition, these
devices are often used to enable covert communication with peers within or outside examination venues, thereby
facilitating cheating and collaborative malpractice (Saka, Ologun, & Nelson, 2022; Selwyn, 2016). Traditional
Page 1348
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
strategies for mitigating wireless device misuse in academic environments have relied on policy enforcement,
manual supervision, and, in some cases, signal jamming. However, the open and shared nature of wireless
communication makes monitoring inherently challenging, while jamming-based approaches introduce
significant drawbacks, including indiscriminate interference with legitimate and emergency communications,
reduced signal-to-noise ratios, and serious ethical, legal, and safety concerns (Ratna & Ravi, 2022; Jasim et al.,
2023; Vadlamani et al., 2016). As a result, recent research has shifted toward passive RF detection and intelligent
classification techniques. Approaches based on fuzzy inference systems and machine learning modelssuch as
support vector machines and random forestshave demonstrated high detection accuracy and reduced false
alarms (Misra et al., 2010; Arjoune et al., 2020). Nevertheless, these methods are often computationally intensive
and data-dependent, limiting their suitability for low-cost, real-time embedded applications. Additionally, the
increasing sophistication of modern wireless technologies, including encryption and MAC address
randomization, has reduced the effectiveness of traditional network-based monitoring, necessitating physical-
layer sensing methods such as RSSI analysis, spectral occupancy estimation, and temporal signal
characterization (Sharma & Kalekar, 2026). Despite these advances, many existing systems remain limited to
single-band operation or specific technologies and fail to provide a comprehensive, real-time view of the RF
environment. There is therefore a clear need for a cost-effective, non-intrusive, and multi-band RF monitoring
system capable of simultaneously detecting and classifying Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and cellular signals. The proposed
tri-band RF detection system addresses this gap by integrating low-cost hardware with efficient temporal-
spectral analysis, offering a practical and scalable solution for minimizing wireless device misuse and enhancing
academic integrity without disrupting communication systems.
REVIEW OF LITERATURES
Wireless communication technologies like Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and cellular networks have become essential parts
of contemporary educational settings, facilitating e-learning, digital collaboration, and smart classroom
solutions. Nevertheless, the broad use of these technologies has also amplified chances for exam misconduct via
illicit internet access, hidden device-to-device communication, and distant information sharing (Singh &
Sharma, 2024). The growing prevalence of smartphones, smartwatches, wireless earbuds, and other compact
wireless gadgets has made detection and monitoring more challenging, as these devices can function subtly and
avoid traditional surveillance techniques (Selwyn, 2016; Eryenyu, Atibun, & Biira, 2025). Different methods
have been suggested to manage unapproved wireless communication in educational settings. Conventional
techniques, such as manual oversight, stringent supervision, and enforcement of institutional policies, are still
commonly utilized but are frequently limited by human factors and the growing complexity of wireless
technologies (Abiebhode & Ifechukwu, 2024). RF jamming methods have been researched and proven effective
in disrupting cellular and Wi-Fi communications; nonetheless, their use is constrained by legal limitations,
ethical issues, interference with emergency communications, and significant power demands (Xing, Peccoud,
Li, Li, & Yang, 2025). Consequently, passive RF monitoring systems have developed into a more feasible and
regulation-adhering option for detecting wireless activity. Numerous RF detection systems have been
documented in the literature. For instance, (Shinde et al., 2024) implemented an affordable mobile phone
detection system utilizing capacitive RF sensing, whereas software-driven monitoring solutions have been
suggested to identify unauthorized entry into institutional Wi-Fi networks (Satar et al., 2024). Nevertheless,
these methods are usually confined to basic detection and lack sophisticated features like multi-band observation,
RSSI measurement, spectral occupancy assessment, temporal behavior analysis, and intelligent signal
categorization. Recent research has investigated spectrum sensing, deep learning, and software-defined radio
(SDR)-based architectures to enhance detection precision (Zhang & Luo, 2024). While these systems showed
potential effectiveness, their reliance on costly hardware and intricate setups restricts their applicability for broad
use in educational settings (H et al., 2025; Bajic et al., 2012; Ismail et al., 2024). Received Signal Strength
Indicator (RSSI) is widely acknowledged as a valuable metric for detecting and classifying wireless signals.
RSSI offers an effective assessment of received signal strength and facilitates the analysis of wireless signal
patterns over time (Mohsin, Abdulameer, & Khudhair, 2017). Earlier research has shown that Wi-Fi, Bluetooth,
and cellular technologies possess unique RSSI profiles and temporal features, where Wi-Fi demonstrates
consistent transmission patterns, Bluetooth reveals sporadic variations due to frequency hopping, and cellular
networks exhibit bursty communication characteristics (Liu et al., 2017). These traits offer essential attributes
Page 1349
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
for signal categorization and wireless activity tracking. Despite these improvements, current systems continue
to be limited by single-band functionality, expensive implementation, restricted portability, and inadequate real-
time analytical features. These constraints highlight a notable research void in creating affordable, mobile, and
smart multi-band RF monitoring systems that can concurrently identify and categorize Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and
cellular signals without causing communication disruption. To fill this void, the current research created an RF
monitoring system based on ESP32 that incorporates NRF24L01 modules for sensing Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, a
1N34A germanium diode-based RF detector for detecting cellular signals, and MATLAB-based visualization
for analyzing RSSI, evaluating spectral occupancy, characterizing temporal behavior, and generating heatmaps.
The proposed system offers a low-cost, passive, scalable, and regulation-adhering solution for wireless activity
tracking, aiding in decreasing examination misconduct and improving academic integrity within educational
settings.
METHODOLOGY
The system integrates embedded signal processing, intelligent classification, real-time data acquisition, and
multi-band RF sensing into a compact, energy- efficient framework. The ESP32 microcontroller serves as the
system's central control and processing unit. It synchronizes data collection from two sensing subsystems, the
1N34A germanium diode-based RF detector and the NRF2401 transceiver module. The NRF24L01 interfaces
with the ESP32 via SPI, enabling precise control and fast communication for scanning the 2.4 GHz ISM band
(2.4002.525 GHz). It uses its Received Power Detector (RPD) feature to continuously scan 125 channels for
RF energy. To estimate approximate RSSI values, calculate spectral occupancy, and examine temporal patterns,
all crucial for differentiating between intermittent Bluetooth transmissions resulting from frequency hopping and
continuous Wi- Fi signals, the ESP32 aggregates these detection results over time. For cellular signal detection,
the 1N34A germanium diode-based RF detector was connected to the ESP32 via its ADC input, enabling analog
signal acquisition. The diode transforms high- frequency RF signals between 900 MHz and 2.3 GHz into a
proportionate DC voltage using the envelope detection principle. An RC filter conditions this signal before the
ESP32' s ADC digitizes it. The system can identify burst- type cellular activity, typical of time- scheduled mobile
communication, by mapping the resulting digital values to equivalent RSSI levels. To distinguish between Wi-
Fi, Bluetooth, and cellular signals based on their distinct behavioral patterns, the ESP 32 processes all collected
data from both sensing units, calculates important parameters like RSSI, spectral occupancy, and temporal
variations, and uses a threshold- based classification algorithm. Additionally, MATLAB implements a real- time
RSSI acquisition and processing framework via serial communication with the ESP32. The microcontroller
continuously streams processed signal strength data, which MATLAB then further processes using filtering
techniques. RSSI plots, heatmaps, and performance graphs display the data in real time after analysis to extract
spectral occupancy and temporal characteristics. This makes it possible to clearly distinguish and categorize
cellular, Bluetooth, and Wi- Fi signals, enabling precise RF activity monitoring. The system is powered by a
2000 mAh rechargeable battery, ensuring portability and 67 hours of operation. The TFT display and buzzer,
integrated for real- time monitoring and alerting, improve situational awareness for users, making it an effective,
affordable, and non- intrusive solution for wireless signal monitoring.
System Design and Implementation
The system design and implementation involved hardware integration, firmware development, RF signal
acquisition, real-time processing, visualization, calibration, and performance evaluation. The ESP32
microcontroller, as depicted in Figures 1 and 2, served as the main control and processing unit because of its
high computational capacity, integrated ADC channels, support for SPI communication, and low power
consumption. In addition to processing RF data, implementing classification algorithms, and coordinating
communication between sensing modules, the ESP32 also sent processed data to MATLAB for real-time
analysis and visualization. The power level of a received wireless signal is represented by the Received Signal
Strength Indicator (RSSI). The system uses the NRF24L01 Received Power Detector (RPD) counts and the ADC
output of the 1N34A germanium diode detector to estimate RSSI values.
Page 1350
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Figure 1: Schematic diagram of WiFi/Bluetooth detector
Figure 2: 1N34A germanium diode detector
For Wi-Fi and Bluetooth sensing, the NRF24L01 transceiver module was interfaced with the ESP32 via the SPI
protocol to enable high-speed communication during spectral scanning. The NRF24L01 continuously scanned
125 channels within the 2.4 GHz ISM band, using its Received Power Detector (RPD) to detect RF activity
above a predefined threshold. Detection counts accumulated across channels and over time samples, and were
used to estimate RSSI values and evaluate spectral occupancy using:
Page 1351
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026

󰇛

󰇜


󰇛
󰇜
󰇛




󰇜
(Equation 1)
The subsystem successfully distinguished continuous Wi-Fi transmissions from intermittent Bluetooth hopping
activity using temporal RSSI and occupancy analysis. See Figure 3
Figure 3: NRF24 connections with the microcontroller
Cellular signal detection was developed using an RF detector based on a 1N34A germanium diode, which
included an antenna input, an RC smoothing circuit, a coupling capacitor, and an ESP32 ADC interface. The
detector functioned through envelope detection, converting incoming RF signals in the 900 MHz2.3 GHz range
into corresponding DC voltages. The ESP32 ADC converted the filtered analog signal into digital form and
correlated it with corresponding RSSI values using:

󰇛

󰇜


󰇛

󰇜 (Equation 2)
This enabled effective detection of burst-type cellular communication activities. See Figure 4
Figure 4: IN34A Germanium diode detector
A subsystem of antennas was incorporated, featuring two 2.4 GHz dipole antennas for Wi-Fi/Bluetooth sensing
and a separate one for cellular detection, enhancing RF sensitivity, signal stability, and detection range. The
firmware was developed in Arduino IDE, which included channel scanning, ADC sampling, RSSI estimation,
spectral occupancy analysis, temporal assessment, threshold-based signal classification, serial communication,
and alert management. Spectral occupancy was assessed using:




while temporal signal variation was computed using:


󰇛



󰇜


(Equation 3)
Processed RSSI data were transmitted continuously to MATLAB via USB serial communication at 115200 baud
for visualization, filtering, logging, and analysis. MATLAB-generated plots of RSSI behavior, spectral
occupancy graphs, Wi-Fi/Bluetooth heatmaps, cellular heatmaps, and temporal analysis plots clearly visualized
Page 1352
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
wireless activity patterns and spectral behavior. The TFT display and buzzer alert subsystem, incorporated for
local real-time monitoring and notification of detected wireless activity, provided immediate visualization of
RSSI levels and signal classifications. The buzzer generated audible alerts whenever RF activity exceeded
predefined thresholds and upon each detection. The complete system was powered by a rechargeable 2000 mAh
lithium-ion battery, integrated with voltage regulation and charging circuitry, providing stable 3.3 V and 5 V
outputs to all subsystems. Figure 5 shows the PCB of the system. Experimental evaluation demonstrated that the
system operated continuously for approximately 67 hours under normal monitoring conditions, confirming its
portability, energy efficiency, and suitability for real-time wireless monitoring applications in academic
environments.
Figure 5: System PCB
Testing
To assess the detection capability, dependability, and real-time operational performance of the tri-band RF
monitoring system, system testing was carried out in examination halls and classrooms. In order to replicate
realistic wireless activity conditions frequently found in academic settings, several wireless-enabled devices
such as smartphones, Bluetooth headsets, smartwatches, Wi-Fi hotspots, and cellular-enabled deviceswere
purposefully introduced into the monitored environment during the testing process. The system successfully
detected burst-type cellular transmissions, continuous Wi-Fi occupancy, and intermittent Bluetooth frequency-
hopping activity within the monitored area. The Experimental evaluation demonstrated stable operation within
the designed voltage range and an effective detection coverage of up to 50 m under normal environmental
conditions. The system further provided real-time notification via the integrated buzzer alert mechanism, while
concurrently transmitting processed RF data to the TFT display and MATLAB interface for visualization and
analysis. Figures 6 and 7 show the entire experimental setup, system operation, and testing outcomes.
Figure 6: The system in Operation
Page 1353
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Figure 7:Testing result
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
Results of testing and evaluation, as shown in the tables below, demonstrated the system's capability to
effectively detect, monitor, and classify Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and cellular wireless activity in classroom and
examination hall environments using passive radio frequency (RF) sensing techniques. The integration of
Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) analysis, spectral occupancy measurement, temporal behavior
characterization, RF heatmap visualization, and intelligent classification enabled comprehensive, real-time
monitoring of wireless activity without interfering with existing communication systems. The system
successfully identified the unique operational characteristics of the monitored wireless technologies, thereby
validating the effectiveness of the proposed monitoring architecture.
Table 1: RSSI Measurement
RSSI Measurement
TIME(s)
1
2
3
4
6
7
9
10
RSSI WIFI
(dBm)
-65
-63
-66
-64
-61
-60
-58
-57
RSSI
Bluetooth
(dBm)
-82
-85
-80
-83
-88
-84
-77
-75
RSSI
Cellular(dBm)
-75
-78
-72
-74
-81
-76
-68
-66
TIME(s)
11
12
13
14
16
17
19
20
Page 1354
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
RSSI WIFI
(dBm)
-56
-55
-54
-53
-51
-50
-48
-47
RSSI
Bluetooth
(dBm)
-78
-81
-85
-87
-79
-76
-73
-72
RSSI
Cellular(dBm)
-69
-73
-77
-80
-71
-67
-64
-63
TIME(s)
21
22
23
24
26
27
29
30
RSSI WIFI
(dBm)
-49
-51
-53
-55
-59
-61
-65
-67
RSSI
Bluetooth
(dBm)
-75
-78
-81
-84
-85
-82
-78
-76
RSSI
Cellular(dBm)
-66
-69
-72
-75
-77
-74
-70
-68
TIME(s)
31
32
33
34
36
37
39
40
RSSI WIFI
(dBm)
-69
-71
-73
-75
-72
-70
-66
-64
RSSI
Bluetooth
(dBm)
-79
-83
-86
-88
-81
-78
-73
-71
RSSI
Cellular(dBm)
-71
-75
-78
-82
-74
-70
-65
-63
TIME(s)
41
42
43
44
46
47
49
50
RSSI WIFI
(dBm)
-62
-60
-58
-56
-52
-50
-46
-45
RSSI
Bluetooth
(dBm)
-74
-77
-80
-83
-84
-81
-75
-72
RSSI
Cellular(dBm)
-66
-69
-72
-75
-76
-73
-66
-63
TIME(s)
-51
52
53
54
56
57
59
60
RSSI WIFI
(dBm)
-47
-49
-51
-53
-57
-59
-63
-65
Page 1355
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
RSSI
Bluetooth
(dBm)
-74
-77
-80
-83
-88
-85
-79
-76
RSSI
Cellular(dBm)
-65
-68
-71
-74
-80
-78
-72
-69
TIME(s)
61
62
63
64
66
67
69
70
RSSI WIFI
(dBm)
-67
-69
-71
-73
-74
-72
-68
-66
RSSI
Bluetooth
(dBm)
-78
-81
-84
-87
-82
-79
-73
-71
RSSI
Cellular(dBm)
-71
-74
-77
-80
-75
-72
-65
-63
TIME(s)
71
72
73
74
76
77
79
80
RSSI WIFI
(dBm)
-64
-62
-60
-58
-54
-52
-48
-46
RSSI
Bluetooth
(dBm)
-74
-77
-80
-83
-84
-81
-75
-72
RSSI
Cellular(dBm)
-66
-69
-72
-75
-76
-73
-67
-64
TIME(s)
81
82
83
84
86
87
89
90
RSSI WIFI
(dBm)
-47
-49
-51
-53
-57
-59
-63
-65
RSSI
Bluetooth
(dBm)
-74
-77
-80
-83
-88
-85
-79
-76
RSSI
Cellular(dBm)
-65
-68
-71
-74
-81
-78
-72
-69
TIME(s)
91
92
93
94
96
97
99
100
RSSI WIFI
(dBm)
-67
-69
-71
-73
-74
-72
-68
-66
RSSI
Bluetooth
(dBm)
-78
-81
-84
-87
-82
-79
-73
-71
Page 1356
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
RSSI
Cellular(dBm)
-71
-74
-77
-80
-75
-72
-66
-64
Table 2: System Performance Measurement
Metric
Wi-Fi
Bluetooth (BLE)
Cellular
Total Detections
142
98
52
True Positives
(Correct
Identifications)
130
85
45
False Positives
(Mistaken Alerts)
12
13
7
Detection Accuracy
(%)
91.55%
86.73%
86.54%
False Alarm Rate
(%)
8.45%
13.27%
13.46%
Average RSSI
(dBm)
60.9 dBm
80.0 dBm
72.4 dBm
Minimum RSSI
(dBm)
75 dBm
88 dBm
82 dBm
Maximum RSSI /
Peak RSSI (dBm)
45 dBm
71 dBm
63 dBm
RSSI Variation
Range (dB)
30 dB
17 dB
19 dB
Strong Burst Count
(Events)
6
5
5
Estimated Spectral
Occupancy (%)
91%
76%
64%
Average
Localization Error
(m)
1.7 m
2.3 m
3.4 m
Average Time to
Alert (s)
3.9 s
3.5 s
5.8 s
Estimated Device
Density (per Hall)
High
Medium
Low
Dominant Temporal
Behaviour
Continuous
Transmission
Frequency
Hopping /
Intermittent
Burst-Type
Communication
Page 1357
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Primary Detection
Band
2.4 GHz ISM
Band
2.4 GHz ISM
Band
900 MHz 2.3
GHz
Common Devices
Detected
Smartphones,
Wi-Fi
hotspots,
laptops,
smartwatches
BLE earpieces,
beacons, wireless
headsets
Mobile phones,
cellular-enabled
devices
Detection Hardware
Used
NRF24L01 +
ESP32
NRF24L01 +
ESP32
1N34A RF
Detector + ESP32
Signal Classification
Basis
Continuous
High RSSI &
High
Occupancy
Intermittent RSSI
Fluctuations
Burst RSSI
Activity
Monitoring
Reliability
Excellent
Very Good
Very Good
Table 3: NRF24 Channel
Channel (MHz)
RPD
Interpretation
2400
1
Some RF signal present
2401
0
Quiet
24022417
1
Continuous → likely WiFi
2418
0
Quiet
2440
1
Occasional spikes → maybe BT
The RSSI measurements in Table 1 and Figure 8a and b revealed distinct signal strength characteristics for Wi-
Fi, Bluetooth, and cellular communications. Wi-Fi signals exhibited the strongest and most stable RSSI values,
ranging approximately from −75 dBm to −45 dBm, with an average close to −60 dBm. The RSSI profile
remained relatively smooth and continuous throughout the observation period, indicating persistent channel
occupancy and continuous packet exchange between access points and connected devices. Several prominent
peaks around samples 20, 50, and 80 corresponded to periods of increased wireless activity and higher network
utilization. Conversely, lower RSSI values around samples 3335 and 9395 suggested temporary reductions in
network traffic or increased attenuation from environmental factors and device movement. The observed Wi-Fi
behavior is consistent with the continuous transmission of beacon frames, management packets,
acknowledgments, and user data that characterize wireless local area networks.
When compared to Wi-Fi, Bluetooth RSSI measurements exhibited significantly different characteristics from
Wi-Fi RSSI measurements. The RSSI values fluctuated between approximately −88 dBm and −71 dBm,
reflecting the low-power and intermittent nature of Bluetooth communication. Frequent peaks and troughs were
observed throughout the monitoring period due to the Frequency-Hopping Spread Spectrum (FHSS) mechanism
used by Bluetooth devices. Stronger Bluetooth activity was observed around samples 1820, 4850, and 7880,
whereas weaker activity occurred around samples 6, 34, 56, and 86. These variations correspond to changes in
packet transmission rates, device activity, propagation conditions, and channel hopping behaviour. The observed
fluctuations clearly demonstrate the capability of the system to distinguish Bluetooth communications from Wi-
Page 1358
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Fi based on RSSI dynamics and temporal characteristics. In contrast to both Wi-Fi and Bluetooth transmissions,
the cellular RSSI measurements showed burst-oriented behavior. Cellular RSSI readings showed periodic peaks
linked to active communication events such as network synchronization, paging activities, voice calls, SMS
exchanges, and mobile data transmissions.
These readings ranged roughly from −82 dBm to −63 dBm. Samples 1820, 3940, 4950, 6970, 7980, and
99100 showed strong cellular activity, whereas intervals with few network transactions showed lesser activity.
The efficacy of the 1N34A germanium diode-based RF detector in recording fleeting cellular activity throughout
the monitored frequency range of roughly 900 MHz to 2.3 GHz is confirmed by these burst-type transmission
patterns. The unique RSSI signatures displayed by cellular, Bluetooth, and Wi-Fi technologies show that signal
strength measurements are a crucial component for wireless signal classification.
Figure 8a: Combined RSSI variations Output Figure 8b: Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and Cellular RSSI
variations
Output
The distinct communication features of the wireless technologies under observation were further emphasized by
the spectrum occupancy results displayed in Figure 9. Wi-Fi exhibited the highest spectral occupancy, remaining
near 100% throughout most of the observation period, with only brief reductions to about 80% at a few intervals.
This behavior reflects the continuous transmission nature of Wi-Fi communication and confirms persistent
utilization of the 2.4 GHz ISM band.
In contrast, Bluetooth spectral occupancy appeared as intermittent bursts separated by periods of low activity.
Occupancy periodically increased to about 4065% before returning to lower levels, reflecting the adaptive
frequency-hopping operation of Bluetooth devices. The most dynamic behavior was observed in cellular spectral
occupancy, which ranged from approximately 20% to 100%, with several peaks indicating active communication
sessions.
The patterns of habitation demonstrate that Wi-Fi communication employs continuous spectrum, Bluetooth
communication uses intermittent hopping-based occupancy, and cellular communication relies on burst-oriented
spectrum access. Since intervals with higher RSSI values were consistently linked to higher spectrum occupancy
and increased wireless activity, the relationship between spectral occupancy and RSSI behavior further supports
the efficacy of the proposed categorization technique.
Page 1359
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Figure 9a: Combined spectral occupancy analysis Figure 9b: Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and Cellular
spectral occupancy
Analysis
Temporal behaviour analysis presented in Figure 10 provided additional insight into the dynamic characteristics
of the monitored wireless signals. Wi-Fi exhibited the lowest temporal variation throughout the monitoring
period, with RSSI changes remaining relatively stable at approximately 2 dBm between consecutive samples.
This stability reflects continuous communication and persistent channel occupancy resulting from regular packet
exchange between access points and connected devices. Bluetooth signals exhibited moderate temporal
variation, with fluctuations ranging from approximately 1 dBm to 5 dBm. These repeated oscillations resulted
from rapid frequency hopping and intermittent transmission behaviour, which continuously altered the received
signal strength. Cellular communication exhibited the highest temporal variation, ranging approximately from 1
dBm to 6 dBm, with numerous prominent peaks corresponding to burst-type communication events controlled
by the cellular network infrastructure. The clear differences observed among the temporal profiles of Wi-Fi,
Bluetooth, and cellular communications demonstrate that temporal variation constitutes a powerful feature for
wireless signal discrimination and significantly improves classification accuracy when combined with RSSI and
spectral occupancy measurements.
Figure 10a: Combined Temporal behaviour analysis Figure 10b: Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and Cellular
Temporal behaviour
Analysis
Page 1360
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
The RF heatmap results shown in Figures 11a and 11b provide a comprehensive visualization of wireless activity
across both the time and frequency domains. The RF energy heatmap generated using the NRF24L01 transceiver
revealed distinct spectral occupancy patterns within the 2.4 GHz ISM band. Continuous RF activity observed
between approximately 2402 MHz and 2417 MHz, as shown in Table 3, indicated sustained Wi-Fi
communication resulting from continuous packet exchange and beacon transmissions. In contrast, intermittent
activity distributed across scattered channels corresponded to Bluetooth transmissions and clearly illustrated the
adaptive frequency-hopping behaviour of Bluetooth devices. Regions exhibiting little or no activity indicated
periods of spectral inactivity and confirmed the sensing subsystem's ability to identify both occupied and
unoccupied spectral regions. The Wi-Fi/Bluetooth heatmap revealed extensive activity across the monitored
channels, with persistent high-intensity areas indicating continual Wi-Fi use and scattered localized spots
representing Bluetooth hopping activity. These findings confirm that the NRF24L01 sensing subsystem
effectively detected both ongoing Wi-Fi transmissions and intermittent Bluetooth communications. In contrast,
the cellular heatmap displayed a distinctly different pattern, with periodic vertical bands of high intensity
separated by intervals of lower activity. These vertical patterns correspond to burst transmissions related to
synchronization, paging, call setup, and mobile data transfer. Overall, the heatmaps visually demonstrated the
clear differences among the wireless technologies and validated the system's ability to differentiate them based
on their spectral and temporal signatures.
Figure 11a: NRF 24 Energy Heatmap Figure 11b: Wifi/Bluetooth and Cellular
Heatmap
The performance metrics outlined in Table 2 additionally confirmed the efficacy of the suggested monitoring
platform. Wi-Fi attained the peak detection accuracy and occupancy rates because of its ongoing transmission
characteristics and constant presence in the observed area. Bluetooth displayed a somewhat diminished
detection performance due to its sporadic hopping mechanism, which at times lowered signal visibility during
scanning periods. Cellular communication demonstrated adequate detection reliability even with the lowest
average occupancy since burst transmissions were successfully identified by the RF detector subsystem. The
minimal false alarm rates observed across all monitored technologies suggest that the threshold-based
classification algorithm applied on the ESP32 effectively distinguished signal types by leveraging RSSI,
spectral occupancy, and temporal behavior features. Moreover, the brief average time-to-alert metrics illustrate
the system's ability to conduct real-time monitoring and swift wireless activity identification, while the
minimal localization error figures suggest that the system can accurately assess the closeness of active wireless
devices within the observed area.
Page 1361
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
CONCLUSION
A significant outcome of this research is the effective execution of a passive wireless monitoring method. In
contrast to traditional RF jamming systems that deliberately interfere with communication channels, the
suggested system functions solely by observing and analyzing current RF activity. As a result, it maintains valid
communication services, adheres to regulatory and ethical standards, and prevents the operational difficulties
linked to signal interference. The combination of the ESP32 microcontroller, NRF24L01 transceiver, 1N34A
RF detector, TFT display, buzzer alert subsystem, and MATLAB visualization system led to a compact,
affordable, portable, and energy-efficient monitoring solution that operates in real time.
In summary, the findings indicate that the tri-band RF monitoring system effectively accomplished its design
goals. The system successfully identified and categorized Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and cellular wireless activities by
utilizing RSSI measurements, spectral occupancy evaluation, temporal behavior analysis, and heatmap
representation. The impressive detection accuracy, minimal false alarm rates, quick response times, low
localization inaccuracies, and passive monitoring ability validate the system's effectiveness in reducing wireless
device abuse, curbing examination dishonesty, and improving academic integrity in educational settings without
disrupting legitimate wireless communication services.
RECOMMENDATION
Future enhancements to the tri-band RF monitoring system must emphasize the incorporation of artificial
intelligence and machine learning methods to improve signal classification precision and facilitate automatic
recognition of wireless devices through their RF signatures. The system can be enhanced to accommodate new
wireless technologies like 5G, ZigBee, LoRa, and Internet of Things (IoT) networks by adding more RF sensing
modules. Improving localization precision through the use of several sensing nodes and triangulation methods
is advised to boost device positioning abilities. Additionally, cloud integration ought to be taken into account to
enable remote surveillance, centralized data oversight, real-time alert creation, and prolonged wireless activity
assessment. Future studies ought to explore adaptive thresholding and smart spectrum analysis techniques to
enhance detection accuracy in changing RF environments while minimizing false alarms. Extensive
implementation and assessment in varied settings are essential to determine scalability and durability. Utilizing
Software-Defined Radio (SDR) technology would enable a more extensive frequency range and enhanced signal
analysis features, while incorporating it with institutional security and exam management systems could facilitate
automated reporting and decision-making functions. These improvements would additionally boost the
efficiency, scalability, and real-world applicability of the system for wireless activity tracking and academic
integrity oversight.
Funding Information
This study was funded by the Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETFund, Nigeria) through the Institution-Based
Research (IBR) of the Federal Polytechnic, Ile-Oluji, Nigeria.
REFERENCES
1. Abiebhode, I. F., & Ifechukwu, E. R. (2024). AI-Driven Smart Examination Invigilation System
Using. Nigerian Journal of Engineering Science Research.
doi:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14961473
2. Arjoune, Y., Salahdine, F., Islam, M. S., Ghribi, E., & Kaabouch, N. (2020). A Novel Jamming
Attacks Detection Approach Based on Machine Learning for Wireless Communication. arxiv.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOIN48656.2020.9016462
3. Bajic, J. S., Milosavljevic, V., Rajs, V., Slankamenac, M., & Zivanov, M. (2012). Universal wireless
communication detector (UD-100) - preventing high-tech cheating methods. Proceedings of the 35th
International Convention MIPRO (pp. 237 - 240). Opatija, Croatia.
Page 1362
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
4. Commsweek. (2014). Nigeria Communications Week. Retrieved from
nigeriacommunicationsweek.com.ng: https://www.nigeriacommunicationsweek.com.ng/ncc-to-
sanction-frequency-jammers/
5. Educause Review. (2009). From Distraction to Engagement: Wireless Devices in the Classroom.
Retrieved from net.educause.edu: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2009/12/from-distraction-to-
engagement-wireless-devices-in-the-classroom
6. Elma Fe E. Gupit, J. F. (2023). Academic Dishonesty in the Digital Era: A Case Study. International
Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 864-874. Retrieved from
https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/academic-dishonesty-in-the-digital-era-a-case-
study/
7. Eryenyu, C., Atibun, D. Z., & Biira, S. (2025). Technology-Driven Examination Malpractices:
Empirical Evidence and. East African Journal of Education, 8(4).
doi:https://doi.org/10.37284/eajes.8.4.4121
8. Eserinune, M. M. (2015). Mobile phone usage among Nigerian university students. Global Journal of
Arts Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(1), 29 - 38. Retrieved from http://www.eajournals.org/
9. H, K. V., Aradhyamatt, G. M., K, B., S, B., & Routh, S. (2025). AI-BASED RF JAMMING AND
MITIGATION. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 13(12). Retrieved from
www.ijcrt.org/papers/IJCRT2512356
10. Ismail, A., Ponniran, A., Choon, C. C., Kan, C. U.-L., Ahmadon, M. A., & Yamaguchi, S. (2024,
October). Mobile Phone Detector in Restricted Area. IEEE 13th Global Conference on Consumer
Electronics (GCCE). Kitakyushu, Japan: IEEE.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/GCCE62371.2024.10760667
11. JammerMaster. (n.d.). Signal Jammers in Nigeria: Laws and Regulations in Force. Retrieved from
jammermaster.com: https://jammermaster.com/regulations/signal-jammers-in-nigeria-laws-and-
regulations-in-force
12. Jasim, S. I., Hamid, O. K., & Alhyani, N. J. (2023, February). A Review of Jamming Attacks in
Wireless Systems. International Journal Of Latest Technology In Engineering & Management
(IJLTEM), 16 - 22. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368471343
13. Liu, W., Kulin, M., Kazaz, T., Shahid, A., Moerman, I., & Moerman, I. (2017). Wireless Technology
Recognition Based on RSSI Distribution at Sub-Nyquist Sampling Rate for Constrained Devices.
Sensor, 17(9). doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/s17092081
14. Madara, D. S., & Namango, S. S. (2016). Faculty Perceptions on Cheating in Exams in Undergraduate.
Journal of Education and Practice, 7(30), 70 -86. Retrieved from
https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/33621
15. Misra, S., Singh, R., & Mohan, S. V. (2010, 4 8). Information Warfare-Worthy Jamming Attack
Detection Mechanism for Wireless Sensor Networks Using a Fuzzy Inference System. Sensors, 10(4),
3444-3479. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/s100403444
16. Mohsin, H. F., Abdulameer, K., & Khudhair, Z. N. (2017). Study and performance analysis of received
signal strength indicator (RSSI) in wireless communication systems. International Journal of
Engineering and Technology, 6(4), 195 - 200. doi:10.14419/ijet.v6i4.29558
17. Nyamawe, A. S., & Mtonyole, N. (n.d.). The Use of Mobile Phones in University Exams Cheating:
Proposed Solution. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT), 17(1), 14 -
17. doi:https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V17P203
18. Ratna, S. R., & Ravi, R. (2022, July). Survey on Jamming Wireless Networks: Attacks and.
International Journal of Computer and Information Engineering, 9(2), 642 - 648. Retrieved from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362044124_Survey_on_Jamming_Wireless_Networks_Att
acks_and_Prevention_Strategies
19. Saka, O. N., Ologun, C., & Nelson, A. (2022). Smartphones and examination malpractice in Nigerian
tertiary institutions. International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology Research, 8(1), 1 - 9.
doi:https://doi.org/10.37745/ijsar.
20. Satar, S. D., Hamid, N. A., Nik, W. N., Mohamad, Z., & Bongsu, R. H. (2024, 8). Wireless Fidelity
(Wi-Fi) Traffic Analysis: A Systematic Review. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied, 50(2), 143
- 154. doi:https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.50.2.143154
Page 1363
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
21. Selwyn, N. (2016). Digital downsides: exploring university students’ negative engagements with
digitaltechnology. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(8), 10061021. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517
22. Sharma, U., & Kalekar, S. M. (2026). Unmasking wi-fi misuse: forensic. International Journal of
ComputerEngineering and Technology (IJCET), 17(1), 56 - 63. doi:
https://doi.org/10.34218/IJCET_17_01_005
23. Shinde, R., Gadhave, S., Swami, S., Kulkarni, R., & Patil, A. K. (2024, 11). Real-Time Mobile Phone
Detection System. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 12(11). Retrieved from
www.ijcrt.org
24. Singh, S. K., & Sharma, H. (2024). Importance and Possibilities of Technology in Education.
Importance and Possibilities of Technology in Education (pp. 35 - 50). New Delhi: Anang Prakashan.
Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383568060
25. Vadlamani, S., Eksioglu, B., & Hugh Medal, A. N. (2016). Jamming attacks on wireless networks: A
taxonomic survey. International Journal of Production Economics, 172, 76 - 94.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.11.008
26. Xing, S., Peccoud, S., LI, S., LI, S., & YANG, T. (2025). IEEE Access. Robust Communication-
Aware Jamming, 200431 - 200445. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3630211
27. Zhang, Y., & Luo, Z. (2024). A Deep-Learning-Based Method for Spectrum Sensing. MDPI, 13(14).
doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13142705