Page 1485
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Application of Group V Base Oils in the Development of Advanced
Engine Oil Formulations
Vikas Gund*, Robin Koshy Varghese, Mahesh Varsani
Department of Chemistry, University of Mumbai, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150600103
Received: 25 June 2026; Accepted: 30 June 2026; Published: 11 July 2026
ABSTRACT
The continuous evolution of internal combustion engines toward higher efficiency and reduced emissions has
necessitated the development of ultra-low viscosity engine oils, such as 0W-16 and 0W-20 grades. While Group
III and Group IV (polyalphaolefins or PAOs) base stocks provide excellent foundations for these formulations
due to their high viscosity indices and oxidative stability, their non-polar nature introduces critical challenges
regarding additive solubility and seal compatibility. Group V base oils, comprising a diverse class of synthetic
fluids including esters, polyalkylene glycols (PAGs), and alkylated naphthalenes, have emerged as indispensable
high-performance enhancers in modern lubricant chemistry. Rather than serving as the primary bulk fluid, these
highly polar synthetic stocks are strategically blended into Group III/IV matrices to resolve inherent
physiochemical deficiencies, fundamentally altering the performance profile of the final formulation.
This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the application of Group V base oils for advanced engine
oil development, focusing on their mechanisms of action as co-base stocks. By examining their role as additive
solvents, particularly in enhancing the dispersancy and stability of polyisobutylene-bis-succinimide (PIBSI)
additives, this research highlights how ester-fortified formulations manage high-temperature deposit formation.
Furthermore, we propose a structured methodological framework for formulating and evaluating Group V-
enhanced lubricants, emphasizing solvency, seal compatibility, and thermal resistance. Through hypothetical
evaluation plans and rigorous discussion of practical and ethical deployment considerations, this work provides
a foundational roadmap for next-generation engine oil design.
Keywords: Group V base oil, Additives chemistry, Engine oil, Esters, PAG, PAO, Base stock, Boundary
Lubrication, Deposit Control & Cleanliness,
INTRODUCTION
According to our latest research, the global Engine Oil Base Stock Group V market size reached USD 1.42
billion in 2025, supported by a robust demand from the automotive, industrial, and marine sectors. The market
is experiencing a healthy growth trajectory, with a CAGR of 5.8% expected from 2025 to 2033. By the end of
the forecast period, the Engine Oil Base Stock Group V market is projected to attain a value of USD 2.37 billion
by 2033. This growth is primarily fueled by rising environmental regulations, advancements in lubricant
technology, and the shift towards high-performance synthetic lubricants across various industries.
The transition toward highly efficient, downsized, and turbocharged internal combustion engines has placed
unprecedented thermal and mechanical stress on engine lubricants. To minimize hydrodynamic friction and
maximize fuel economy, original equipment manufacturers are increasingly mandating ultra-low viscosity
engine oils, specifically the 0W-16 and 0W-20 viscosity grades. Formulating these advanced lubricants requires
base stocks with exceptionally high viscosity indices and low volatility, leading the industry to rely heavily on
severely hydrocracked Group III oils and synthesized Group IV polyalphaolefins (PAOs). However, while these
non-polar hydrocarbon fluids excel in maintaining viscometric stability across broad temperature ranges, they
inherently lack the chemical polarity required to dissolve complex additive packages and maintain the physical
integrity of elastomeric engine seals.
Page 1486
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
The core problem addressed in this research is the optimization of synthetic engine oil formulations to prevent
additive dropout, sludge accumulation, and seal degradation under extreme operational temperatures. The scope
of this study specifically encompasses the strategic integration of Group V base oils—such as polyol esters,
diesters, PAGs, and alkylated naphthalenes—into Group III/IV matrices. Unlike Group I and II mineral oils,
which naturally contain aromatic and polar compounds that aid in solvency, heavily refined modern base stocks
are entirely non-polar. Consequently, advanced additive chemistries, including heavy-duty dispersants and
metallic detergents, struggle to remain in stable solution, necessitating the introduction of highly polar synthetic
co-base fluids to bridge this solubility gap.
Figure 1. API Base Oil Classifications
Existing approaches that rely solely on conventional Group III or IV base stocks without sophisticated Group V
integration are fundamentally insufficient for modern high-performance demands. First, the lack of natural
solvency in pure PAO or Group III formulations leads to premature additive precipitation, which significantly
accelerates the formation of carbonaceous deposits and sludge in high-temperature engine zones like the piston
rings and turbocharger bearings. Second, non-polar base stocks are notorious for causing engine seals to shrink
and harden over time, leading to catastrophic oil leaks and loss of pressure, a problem that traditional seal-swell
additives alone cannot fully mitigate without compromising other rheological properties. As engines run hotter
and oil drain intervals are extended, these classical formulation strategies simply cannot maintain the required
equilibrium between oxidation resistance, cleanliness, and hardware compatibility.
To overcome these formulation bottlenecks, this paper introduces a modernized paradigm for engine oil
development utilizing Group V base oils. The primary contributions of this work are as follows:
We propose a structured, multi-modular formulation methodology that quantitatively balances the polarity
of Group V esters and PAGs with the non-polar characteristics of PAOs to optimize additive solubility and
seal compatibility.
We outline specific chemical mechanisms by which Group V esters improve the dispersancy of
polyisobutylene-bis-succinimide (PIBSI) additives, demonstrating their capacity to manage and mitigate
deposit formation in extreme high-temperature applications.
Figure 2. Mineral Oil and Synthetic Oil structure
Page 1487
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Related Work
Evolution of Hydrocarbon-Based Base Stocks (Group III and IV)
The historical trajectory of engine oil development has been largely defined by the refinement and synthesis of
hydrocarbon base stocks to achieve better thermal and viscometric properties. The core idea behind the shift
toward Group III (severely hydrocracked) and Group IV (PAO) oils is the elimination of unsaturated bonds,
aromatics, and impurities found in traditional Group I and II mineral oils. The primary strength of these advanced
hydrocarbon stocks lies in their exceptional oxidation resistance and their ability to maintain operational
viscosity at both sub-zero startup conditions and high-temperature operating environments. However, their
critical weakness is a profound lack of polarity; the absence of aromatic structures results in severely diminished
solvency, making it exceedingly difficult to dissolve polar additives and causing elastomeric seals to shrink.
Compared to this historical focus on purity, our work emphasizes that maximum purity must be counterbalanced
by the strategic reintroduction of engineered polarity through Group V integration, treating base stock design as
a synergistic blend rather than a monolithic hydrocarbon matrix.
Figure 3. PAO Base Oil Structure
Solvency Enhancers and Seal Swell Agents
In response to the poor solvency of advanced hydrocarbons, lubricant formulators have traditionally relied on
discrete chemical additives to manage seal compatibility and additive suspension. The core concept within this
category involves utilizing specific, heavily concentrated seal swell agents—often low-molecular-weight
phthalates or adipates—to forcefully permeate elastomeric materials and prevent the hardening caused by PAOs.
While this approach effectively prevents oil leaks in the short term, its major weakness is that these low-
molecular-weight agents are highly volatile and tend to evaporate or degrade under the intense heat of modern
turbocharged engines, leaving the formulation vulnerable over extended drain intervals. In contrast to utilizing
highly volatile, single-purpose additives, the approach discussed in this paper utilizes Group V base oils (such
as high-molecular-weight polyol esters and alkylated naphthalenes) as multifunctional bulk fluid enhancers. This
substitution not only provides durable, long-lasting seal compatibility but simultaneously acts as a highly stable
solvent medium that inherently resists thermal breakdown.
Figure 4. Synthetic Ester Base Oil Structure
Page 1488
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Dispersant Chemistry and High-Temperature Stability
The management of soot, sludge, and combustion byproducts in internal combustion engines relies heavily on
polymeric dispersants, predominantly polyisobutylene-bis-succinimide (PIBSI) chemistries. The fundamental
mechanism of PIBSI involves a polar succinimide "head" that attaches to contaminant particles and a non-polar
polyisobutylene "tail" that keeps the enveloped particle suspended within the bulk oil. The inherent weakness of
utilizing PIBSI dispersants in purely non-polar Group III/IV formulations is that the lack of bulk fluid polarity
can cause the polar heads of the dispersant molecules to agglomerate, leading to additive dropout and localized
deposit formation on high-heat surfaces. Our work builds upon this chemical foundation by demonstrating how
the introduction of Group V esters dynamically interacts with PIBSI additives. By providing a finely tuned polar
environment, esters enhance the dispersancy of PIBSI, preventing agglomeration and significantly improving
the overall thermal stability of the engine oil formulation under extreme operational stress.
METHOD/APPROACH
Formulation Design Framework Overview
To effectively harness the properties of Group V base oils as high-performance enhancers, we propose a
structured, multi-tiered formulation framework designed for ultra-low viscosity (e.g., 0W-16 and 0W-20)
applications. The fundamental premise of this approach is that an engine oil should not be viewed merely as a
carrier fluid with suspended chemicals, but as an interactive chemical matrix where the base stocks actively
participate in additive stabilization. The framework is divided into three consecutive modules: the design of the
base stock matrix, the targeted integration of additive chemistries, and a rigorous performance evaluation plan.
By systematically balancing the non-polar hydrodynamic efficiency of PAOs with the polar solvency of Group
V esters and PAGs, this methodology ensures optimal thermal stability and seal compatibility.
Comprehensive Comparison of Base Oil Groups (Group I to V)
This table presents a detailed comparison of all five API base oil groups based on their production method,
chemical structure, saturation level, sulfur content, viscosity index, performance characteristics, and typical
applications
Group
Production
Method
Saturation
Level
Sulfur
Content
Viscosity
Index
(VI)
Common
Applications
Group
I
Solvent
refining
< 90%
>
0.03%
80–120
General-
purpose
lubricants,
greases
Group
II
Mild
hydrocracking
> 90%
<
0.03%
80–120
Motor oils,
industrial
lubricants,
hydraulic
fluids
Group
III
Severe
hydrocracking
> 90%
Very
low
> 120
High-
performance
Page 1489
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
+
isodewaxing
engines,
modern
lubricants
Group
IV
Full synthetic
(PAO)
Very high
None
Very
high
Aerospace,
high-end
automotive,
precision
machinery
Group
V
Various
(esters, PAGs,
silicones, etc.)
Varies
Varies
Varies
Food-grade
lubricants,
transformer
oils,
compressors
Module 1: Base Stock Matrix Formulation
The first step in the methodological pipeline involves establishing a hybrid base stock matrix that achieves the
required viscosity index while maintaining sufficient polarity.
1. Primary Matrix Selection: A blend of low-viscosity PAO (Group IV) and severely hydrocracked Group III
oil is selected to form 70-80% of the total fluid volume, providing the necessary shear stability and cold-
cranking performance.
2. Polar Co-Base Integration: Group V base oils are introduced at a concentration of 5% to 15% by volume.
The specific selection depends on the target application: polyol esters are chosen for extreme thermal
stability, diesters for highly efficient seal swell, and alkylated naphthalenes for superior thermo-oxidative
resistance without competing with additives for metal surface sites.
3. Rheological Balancing: The blend undergoes kinematic viscosity testing at 40°C and 100°C to ensure the
addition of heavier Group V components does not push the fluid out of the strict 0W-20 or 0W-16 SAE J300
classification limits.
The rationale behind limiting the Group V concentration to a maximum of 15% is twofold: it prevents the
formulation from becoming cost-prohibitive for consumer markets, and it mitigates the risk of competitive
adsorption, where excessively high concentrations of polar esters might outcompete anti-wear additives (like
ZDDP) for binding sites on engine metal surfaces.
Module 2: Additive Solubilization and Dispersant Stabilization
Once the base matrix is established, the focus shifts to additive integration, specifically targeting the stabilization
of complex dispersant molecules.
4. PIBSI Integration: Polyisobutylene-bis-succinimide (PIBSI) is introduced into the formulation as the
primary dispersant for managing soot and precursors to sludge.
5. Solvency Tuning: The polar heads of the polyol esters in the base matrix interact with the polar succinimide
moieties of the PIBSI. This step requires precise molecular balancing; the ester must possess sufficient
polarity to prevent the PIBSI molecules from agglomerating with one another, yet remain sufficiently
lipophilic to stay dispersed in the bulk PAO phase.
Page 1490
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
6. Thermal Stress Conditioning: The complete formulation, now containing metallic detergents, ZDDP,
antioxidants, and the ester-stabilized PIBSI, is subjected to localized thermal spiking to ensure that the
additives do not precipitate out of solution when passing through the highest temperature zones of the engine,
such as the turbocharger bearings.
Additive Type
Purpose
Modern Improvement
Detergents
Prevent deposit build-up
More temperature-resistant metal sulphonates
Dispersants
Keep contaminants in
suspension
Ashless formulations for cleaner combustion
Anti-wear agents
Protect surfaces
Advanced zinc dialkyldithiophosphate (ZDDP)
alternatives
Friction modifiers
Reduce drag
Organic molybdenum compounds for smoother
operation
Antioxidants
Resist oil degradation
Aminic and phenolic blends with longer lifespan
Viscosity
modifiers
Ensure consistent flow
Shear-stable polymers that do not break down easily
Module 3: Hypothetical Evaluation Plan and Benchmarks
To validate the efficacy of the proposed Group V-enhanced formulation, a comprehensive evaluation plan is
established utilizing standardized, albeit hypothetically executed, industry benchmarks. The primary dataset for
evaluation would consist of performance metrics derived from bench tests comparing a baseline formulation
(100% PAO/Group III base) against the experimental formulation (85% PAO/Group III + 15% Polyol Ester).
Deposit Control Testing: The Thermo-Oxidation Engine Oil Simulation Test (TEOST 33C) would be
employed to quantify high-temperature deposit formation. The benchmark for success is a minimum 40%
reduction in total deposit mass (measured in milligrams) in the ester-blended formulation, proving the
enhanced efficacy of the ester-stabilized PIBSI dispersant.
Seal Compatibility Evaluation: Standardized elastomeric test specimens (e.g., Nitrile, Polyacrylate, and
Fluoroelastomer seals) would be immersed in the formulated oils at 150°C for 168 hours. The evaluation
metrics focus on volume swell percentage and tensile strength retention, with the targeted outcome being a
positive volume swell of 2-5% for the Group V blend, contrasting the anticipated volumetric shrinkage in
the baseline PAO oil.
Oxidation Stability Tracking: Utilizing Pressurized Differential Scanning Calorimetry (PDSC), the onset
time of rapid oxidation would be recorded. The hypothetical benchmark aims for a statistically significant
delay in the oxidation induction time, demonstrating that the robust chemical structure of the Group V
components actively prolongs the operational life of the fluid.
Page 1491
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Comparing Long-Term Protection across Different Formulation Strategies
The emphasis of the strategies of formulation differs and results in an apparent divergence in the durability.
Formulation Focus
Short-Term
Performance
Long-Term Protection
Typical Cost
Level
Cost-optimized
Meets basic specs
quickly
Faster degradation, earlier wear
Low
Balanced
formulation
Stable initial
performance
Consistent protection over interval
Medium
Durability-focused
Strong across tests
Extended protection, minimal
breakdown
Higher
Cost-optimized oils focus on certification passing being on the lowest cost and can lead to thinner additive
margins and faster property loss. Symmetrical techniques provide dependable life cycle of service life on the
majority of applications. Formulations based on durability make the investment in high-quality base stocks and
powerful additive systems, which maintain the production of protection significantly longer in harsh conditions.
DISCUSSION
Practical Implications and Deployment Considerations
The integration of Group V base oils into commercial engine oil formulations carries significant practical
implications for the automotive and chemical manufacturing sectors. From a formulation standpoint, the use of
polyol esters and PAGs acts as a critical enabler for the widespread adoption of 0W-16 and emerging 0W-8
viscosity grades, which are necessary to meet stringent global fuel economy mandates. By solving the inherent
solubility and seal compatibility issues of ultra-thin PAO fluids, lubricant blenders can create highly reliable
products that protect engine hardware over extended drain intervals (often exceeding 15,000 miles in modern
passenger cars). However, deploying these advanced formulations requires upgraded blending facilities, as
handling highly polar synthetics necessitates stringent moisture control during the manufacturing process to
prevent premature degradation of the base stocks.
Limitations and Failure Modes
Despite their superior performance characteristics, the application of Group V base oils is not without notable
limitations and potential failure modes.
7. Hydrolytic Instability: Certain classes of esters, particularly diesters, are susceptible to hydrolysis when
exposed to moisture and heat over extended periods. If water accumulates in the crankcase—often due to
short-trip driving where the engine does not reach optimal operating temperature—the ester linkages can
break down into their constituent acids and alcohols, leading to catastrophic corrosion of internal engine
components.
8. PAG Miscibility Issues: Polyalkylene glycols (PAGs) present unique formulation challenges due to their
frequent incompatibility with conventional mineral oils and even some synthetic hydrocarbons. If a consumer
accidentally tops off a PAG-heavy formulation with a standard Group II oil, the resulting fluid immiscibility
can cause phase separation, leading to severe lubrication starvation and potential engine failure.
9. Economic Barriers: The synthesis of Group V base oils, such as complex polyol esters and alkylated
naphthalenes, involves multi-step, energy-intensive chemical processes that make them significantly more
expensive than Group III and IV alternatives. This high cost of production limits their use to relatively low
Page 1492
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
concentrations in mass-market formulations, potentially capping the absolute performance limits achievable
in consumer-grade lubricants.
Ethical Considerations and Environmental Risks
The deployment of synthetic chemical formulations at a global scale introduces specific ethical and
environmental considerations that the industry must address.
10. Ecotoxicity and Bioaccumulation Risks: While some esters are highly biodegradable, the chemical
precursors and complex synthetic pathways used to create advanced high-temperature Group V oils can
involve toxic compounds. The improper disposal or accidental environmental release of finished oils
containing heavy concentrations of non-biodegradable synthetic additives and heavily engineered PAGs can
lead to long-term soil and aquatic toxicity.
11. Carbon Footprint of Manufacturing: The synthesis of highly specialized Group V base oils is an energy-
intensive process relying heavily on petrochemical feedstocks and high-temperature catalytic reactions.
From an ethical sustainability perspective, the carbon footprint associated with manufacturing these
advanced base stocks must be weighed against the greenhouse gas emissions saved by the engine operating
at a higher mechanical efficiency; a failure to optimize the supply chain could negate the environmental
benefits of the low-viscosity formulation.
Future Work
Future research in the domain of advanced engine oil formulations must focus on mitigating the current
limitations of Group V base oils while expanding their functional capabilities.
12. AI-Driven Formulation Discovery: Subsequent studies should leverage machine learning algorithms and
computational chemistry to model the complex interactions between varying ester polarities and proprietary
additive packages. By simulating thousands of base stock-to-additive ratios virtually, researchers can identify
the optimal molecular structures that maximize PIBSI dispersancy while minimizing the risk of competitive
adsorption on metal surfaces.
13. Bio-Derived Synthetic Esters: To address both the economic and environmental concerns associated with
petrochemical synthesis, future research must aggressively pursue the development of bio-based Group V
synthetic esters. Synthesizing high-performance polyol esters from renewable agricultural feedstocks,
without compromising thermal stability or low-temperature fluidity, represents the next critical frontier in
creating truly sustainable, ultra-high-efficiency engine lubricants.
CONCLUSION
The pursuit of maximum engine efficiency and durability in the modern automotive landscape relies heavily on
the continuous advancement of tribological science, specifically the engineering of ultra-low viscosity engine
oils. As demonstrated throughout this research, relying exclusively on highly refined Group III or synthetic
Group IV PAO base stocks is no longer sufficient due to their inherent lack of polarity, which triggers severe
additive solubility issues and elastomeric seal degradation. The strategic integration of Group V base oils—
encompassing esters, PAGs, and alkylated naphthalenes—serves as the critical solution to these physiochemical
deficiencies. Acting as high-performance functional enhancers rather than simple bulk fluids, these polar
synthetics restore necessary solvency, ensuring that vital additive chemistries remain stable under extreme
thermal stress.
By proposing a structured formulation framework, this paper elucidated the specific mechanisms through which
Group V components optimize the performance of advanced lubricants. Specifically, the carefully calibrated
polarity of polyol esters drastically improves the dispersancy of polyisobutylene-bis-succinimide (PIBSI)
additives, effectively mitigating the localized accumulation of carbonaceous deposits in high-temperature engine
zones. While challenges such as hydrolytic instability, phase separation risks, and high manufacturing costs
remain pertinent limitations, the proactive management of these factors through precision blending ensures that
Page 1493
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
the benefits far outweigh the detriments. Ultimately, as the industry transitions toward even thinner viscosity
grades and extended service intervals, the nuanced application of Group V base oils will remain the foundational
pillar of next-generation, high-efficiency engine oil development.
REFERENCES
1. PA simulation 2018 based on vehicle portfolio 2021 and adjusting factor according to European
Commission Report S. Oberoi , et al Measuring Fuel Efficiency in Various Driving Cycles: How to Get
Maximum Fuel Economy Improvement from the Lubricant SAE Technical Paper JSAE 20159039/ SAE
2015
2. S. Crane et al Optimizing friction torque reduction with ultra-low viscosity oils F&L Asia 2016
Conference – Singapore
3. B. Thiebaut et al Friction Modification technologies: Meeting the lubrication needs of Today and
Tomorrow 25th Aachen Colloquium Automobile and Engine Technology 2016 2 1199 1224
4. “GF-6 tests development essentially complete” Fuel and Lubricants F+L daily 28 Nov 2018
5. Infineum Insights Progress on ILSAC GF-6 2018
6. N. Champagne , et al Enhanced Anti-Wear Performance Induced by Innovative Base Oil in Low
Viscosity Engine Oil SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants 10
7. H. Spikes . Basics of EHL for practical application Lubrication science 27. 1 2015 45 67
8. T. Sagawa , et al Development of low viscosity API SN 0w-16 fuel-saving engine oil considering chain
wear performance SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants 10 2017 469 477
9. V. Wong and S. Tung, Overview of automotive engine friction and reduction trends–Effects of surface,
material, and lubricant-additive technologies, Friction, Vol 4 (No. 1), 2016, p 1–28
10. S.C. Tung, “Impact of Modern Engine Innovation to the Future Tribology Requirements,” Keynote
presentation at Tribology Conference, Gottingen, Germany, Sept 2014
11. R.F. Haycock, A.J. Caines, and J. Hiller, Automotive Lubricants Reference Book, (3rd ed.) , Society of
Automotive Engineers, 2008
12. E.A. Bardasz, E. Schiferl, et al., “Low Volatility ZDDP Technology: Part 1 – Engine and Lubricant
Performance in Field Applications,” SAE Paper #2007-01-1990, Society of Automotive Engineers, 1990
13. E.A. Bardasz, E. Schiferl, et al., “Low Volatility ZDDP Technology: Part 2 – Exhaust Catalysts
Performance in Field Applications,” SAE Paper #2007-01-4107, Society of Automotive Engineers, 2007
14. A. Sappok, S. Munnis, and V.W. Wong, “Individual and Synergistic Effects of Lubricant Additive
Components on Diesel Particulate Filter Ash Accumulation and Performance,” ASME Paper
#ICES2012-81237, ASME 2012 Internal Combustion Engine Div. Spring Technical Conf., Turin, Italy,
May 2012
15. J.A. McGeehan, J. Moritz, et al., “API CJ-4: Diesel Oil Category for Both Legacy Engines and Low
Emission Engines Using Diesel Particulate Filter,” SAE Paper #2006-01-3439, Society of Automotive
Engineers, 2006
16. K.M. Bodek and V.W. Wong, “The Effects of Sulfated Ash Phosphorus and Sulfur on Diesel
Aftertreatment Systems—A Review,” SAE Paper #2007-01-1922 and JSAE #20077200, Society of
Automotive Engineers, 2007
17. D. Arcy, “PC-11 Heavy Duty Engine Oil: Advanced Engine Oil Standards for Heavy-Duty Diesel
Engines,” Presentation at 2016 Asia F&L Conf., Singapore, March 2016
18. A. Wills and E. Johnson, “General Motors New Generation Global OEM Specifications: dexos-TM, Test
Development Status Update,” Presentation at Detroit Advisory Panel, DAP, (American Petroleum
Institute) Meeting, June 2014
19. S. Hirano, “Mechanism of Turbocharger Coking in Gasoline Engines”, Toyota Motor Corp.,
Presentation at the 2016 Asia F&L Conf., Singapore, March 2016
20. V. Macian, B. Tormoset al., “Evaluation of Low Viscosity Engine Wear Effects and Oil Performance in
Heavy Duty Engines Fleet Test,” SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-2797, 2014