Page 2295
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Impact of Instagram Reels vs. YouTube Shorts on Brand
Engagement among Gen Z Changes
Vinayak Manappa Totad
*
, Dr. Vinay K S
RV Institute of Management, Bengaluru
*Corresponding Author
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150600166
Received: 27 June 2026; Accepted: 02 July 2026; Published: 18 July 2026
ABSTRACT
Social media has transformed how brands communicate with consumers, with short-form video platforms
emerging as key marketing channels. This study examines the impact of Instagram Reels and YouTube Shorts
on brand engagement among Gen Z, focusing on brand discovery, engagement, and purchase intention, and
comparing each platform’s effectiveness in building awareness.
Prior research links short-form videos to brand visibility and purchase decisions, but most studies examine
platforms in isolation, leaving gaps in direct comparison, platform-driven differences in student interaction, and
links between platform preference and purchase intention among young Indian consumers.
A descriptive design was adopted. Primary data were collected via a structured Google Forms questionnaire
from 300 Gen Z respondents, mainly college students aged 1726, using convenience sampling, supplemented
by secondary data from journals and reports. Data were analysed using frequency, percentage, Chi-square,
ANOVA, and Spearman correlation.
Instagram Reels emerged as the most preferred platform (40%), while 35.7% used both equally. Most
respondents (57.3%) watched brand-related short videos often, with 57.3% agreeing such videos aid brand
discovery and 64% finding them more engaging. YouTube Shorts proved effective at retaining attention (59.7%
watched until the end), and 58% credited algorithms for brand discovery. On purchase intention, 57% agreed
short video ads influence product trials, and 52.7% reported higher purchase likelihood after viewing. All four
hypotheses were supported, confirming significant links between brand discovery and engagement, engagement
and purchase intention, platform preference and perceived engagement, and algorithms and trial decisions.
Both platforms significantly shape brand engagement and purchase intention among Gen Z. Instagram Reels
leads in preference and visual content, while YouTube Shorts shows stronger retention, with algorithms acting
as a key bridge between content and consumer. Marketers should prioritise authentic, creative short-form
content to engage young audiences. Future research could expand the sample, include other platforms, and
examine brand loyalty.
Keywords: short-form videos; brand engagement; Gen Z consumers; Instagram Reels; YouTube Shorts; social
media marketing; purchase intention
INTRODUCTION
In today's digital age, short video content has become an effective medium to engage Gen Z consumers. The use
of social media sites like Instagram and YouTube has revolutionised the way content is produced and consumed.
Their short video format, such as reels and shorts, have become increasingly popular. Generation Z consumers
with a short attention span, steered by visuals, and seeking authenticity in content, play a unique role in engaging
with these platforms (Youn et al., 2024). So it is crucial for marketers and academics to recognise their impact
on consumer engagement.
Page 2296
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Instagram Reels has proven to be effective in building brand awareness and driving passive engagement in the
form of likes and views. With its engaging and visually stimulating format, it is particularly appealing to Gen Z
and successful at grabbing users' attention. Research by Sánchez et al. (2025) shows that Reels are more likely
to garner more likes and views, suggesting good performance in the first stage of the marketing funnel. Likewise,
Fatimah et al. (2025) note the importance of short videos like Reels for enhancing brand awareness and reach
for Gen Z.
Conversely, YouTube Shorts presents unique engagement methods. Although it may not always reach audiences
as effectively as Reels, it is effective in obtaining active audience engagement, including comments and
subscriptions. The study by Sánchez et al. (2025) suggests that YouTube drives greater interactive engagement,
including comments. This is corroborated by Fatimah et al. (2025), who suggest that Shorts are successful in
changing consumer behaviours and in creating long-term brand consumer relationships.
Another key element of engagement for both platforms is authenticity. Gen Z consumers are more likely to
engage with content that is perceived as authentic, relatable and produced for the sake of using the products
rather than polished ads. Parisi et al. (2025) indicate that authentic influencer marketing strategies have a positive
effect on engagement and purchase intention. Additionally, Putra et al. (2025) highlight that user-generated
content (UGC) and stories are important ways by which Gen Z consumers establish trust and loyalty, thus
enhancing engagement with brands.
Drawing on these findings, the current research seeks to explore the differences in the impact of Instagram Reels
and YouTube Shorts on brand engagement among Gen Z users. Through a comparative analysis of the reach,
interaction and conversion rate, the study aims to offer insights to marketers for designing effective digital
strategies. This, in turn, will help brands to develop engaging, relatable, and effective content that appeals to
Gen Z. of Gen Z audiences.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Short-Form Video & Brand Engagement
Chawla et al. (2025) said brands also use Instagram Reels to connect with their audiences. Now brands
are more interested in authentic content rather than expensive ads. This allows them to connect with
users, but is hard to track.
Fatimah et al. (2025) found engagement rates were higher with short videos on TikTok, Reels and Shorts.
Emotional connection, popular music, and viewer engagement are key in drawing viewers in. They also
recommended brands to use platforms together.
Islam et al. (2025) said that short video marketing enhances brand recognition and trust. It also increases
user interaction and engagement. The research suggests algorithms and micro-influencers are crucial
elements to success.
Instagram Reels & User Behaviour
Rahman et al. (2025) found viewing Instagram Reels has a positive impact on brands. Viewers of Reels
are more likely to favour and select brands. Influencers and emotions are important factors in user
decision making .
Lee et al. (2024) demonstrated entertainment, interactivity and escapism are primary motivations for
users of Reels. This develops a positive influence from the content. This also increases continuous usage
of Reels .
According to Kannan et al. (2024) Indian youth use Reels which is in high demand among 18-24 year-
olds. Their study found that it offers a great opportunity for brands to reach GenZ. It's an important
medium for spending time online.
Page 2297
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
In fact, Doloi et al. (2024) discovered that Instagram Reels is one of the most popular format for Gen Z.
It has an impact on user engagement and purchase intention behaviour. Influencers and brand user-
generated content are key to this process.
Wolfe et al. (2022) did a comparison between Reels and posts. The researchers found Reels are liked
and commented on more. This indicates that short videos are more engaging.
3. YouTube Shorts & Engagement
Violot at al. (2024) found YouTube Shorts have more views and likes, showing more engagements. They
found Shorts have more views and likes, which leads to more engagement. But long videos are still more
effective in certain types of content, such as educational content.
Rajendran et al. (2024) found that short videos get more engagement than the long-form videos. This is
also reflected in how people are creating videos. People are now producing more short-form videos .
4. Gen Z Behaviour & Motivation
Youn et al. (2024) found that entertainment, social interaction, and information are key motivations for
Gen Z. These factors create a positive attitude towards branded content. This also improves long-term
brand relationships .
Ayo et al. (2025) studied Short videos used by Gen Z was found to have no negative effect on study.
They also added that content (rather than channel) is more important. Learning content can even be
beneficial.
Bi et al. (2023) revealed greater exposure to short videos leads to higher purchase intention. Social media
tactics play key roles when it comes to sales. This demonstrates the power of short videos.
Lin et al. (2023) explained that short videos affect consumer attitudes and product choices. Interaction
between creators and users also increases engagement. This leads to higher involvement and interest .
5. Technology & Algorithms
Roberts et al. (2025) found that recommendation systems and algorithms strongly influence engagement.
Easy content discovery and platform design increase user activity. These features shape how users
consume content .
Research Gaps
Most of the research describes short-form video but don't compare Instagram Reels and YouTube Shorts. There
is hardly any evidence showing the difference in brand engagement on both the platforms among Gen Z. And
many studies discuss views and likes, but don't explain influencer impact and conversion. Further, there is a lack
of comparison between the two platforms in the role of authenticity and influencer's impact. This means we
need research on both platforms to find which is better for brands to engage with their Gen Z audience.
Research Objectives
To examine the level of brand engagement created by Instagram Reels among Gen Z through interactions
such as likes, comments, shares, and brand recall.
To examine the level of brand engagement created by YouTube Shorts among Gen Z using similar
engagement indicators.
To compare the effectiveness of Instagram Reels and YouTube Shorts in generating brand engagement
among Gen Z.
Page 2298
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
To identify the key factors that influence Gen Z’ preference for either Instagram Reels or YouTube Shorts
for watching brand-related content.
To analyze the relationship between brand engagement on these platforms and purchase intention among
Gen Z.
Hypothesis Development
Hypothesis 1
H₀ (Null Hypothesis): There is no significant relationship between discovering new brands and users’ tendency
to like or react to brand-related videos.
H₁ (Alternative Hypothesis): There is a significant relationship between discovering new brands and users’
tendency to like or react to brand-related videos.
Hypothesis 2
H₀ (Null Hypothesis): There is no significant association between brand discovery and purchase intention
among consumers.
H₁ (Alternative Hypothesis): Brand engagement has a significant influence on the purchase intention of
consumers.
Hypothesis 3
H₀ (Null Hypothesis): Users’ preferred short-video platform does not influence their perception of Instagram
Reels as a more engaging medium for brand content.
H₁ (Alternative Hypothesis): Users’ preference for short-video platforms significantly influences their
perception of Instagram Reels as a more engaging platform for brand-related content.
Hypothesis 4
H₀ (Null Hypothesis): Recommendation algorithms have no significant impact on product trial decisions
influenced by short video advertisements.
H₁ (Alternative Hypothesis): Recommendation algorithms significantly affect product trial decisions
influenced by short video advertisements.
RESEARCH
iMETHODOLOGY
Research
iDesign
The
icurrent istudy iuses ia idescriptive iapproach ito istudy ithe iusage ipatterns, ipreferences iand iengagement iof
iGeneration iZ iconsumers. iThis idesign iis iappropriate ifor iexamining iInstagram iReels iusers' iand iYouTube
iShorts iusers' iinteraction iwith ibrands' icontent iand ifor irecognising ipatterns iin itheir ireactions.
Data
iCollection
This
istudy iused iprimary iand isecondary idata isources ifor ia iholistic iapproach.
Primary iData:
The istudy iused iprimary idata iobtained ivia ia iquestionnaire ideveloped ion iGoogle iForms. iThe isurvey
i
questions iwere imostly imultiple-choice iquestions iand iLikert iscale iquestions ito iunderstand
Page 2299
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
irespondents' iperception, iengagement iand iconsumption ibehaviour itowards ishort-form ivideos.
Secondary
iData:
Secondary
idata iwas icollected ifrom isources ilike ieducational ijournals, iresearch ipapers, iindustry
ireports, iamong iothers iand irelevant iwebsites iin ithe iarea iof isocial imedia imarketing iand iconsumer
iengagement.
Sampling
Sample iSize: i300 irespondents i(Gen iZ)
Target iPopulation: iGeneration iZ iwho iare iactive iusers iof iInstagram iReels iand iYouTube iShorts
Sampling iTechnique: iConvenience isampling iwas iused ibecause iof itime iand iconvenience ifactors
Sampling
iArea: iA isample iof iundergraduate iand iyoung iprofessionals iwho iare ioften iactive iin isocial
i
media
Tools
iof iAnalysis
Data
iwas ianalysed iin iMicrosoft iExcel iand ibasic istatistical ianalysis. iThe ifollowing imethods iwere iapplied:
Frequency iAnalysis: iTo iinvestigate irespondents' idemographic iprofile i& iusage ipatterns
Percentage iAnalysis: iTo iassess ithe ilevel iof iengagement ifor iInstagram iReels iand iYouTube iShorts
Comparative
iAnalysis: iTo icompare ithe ieffectiveness iof ieach iplatform iin iengaging iGen iZ iusers iwith
i
brands
Limitations
iof ithe iStudy
The
istudy, iwhile iwell-planned, ihas ilimitations:
The iconvenience isample imay inot icapture ithe idiversity iof iGen iZ
The inumber iof irespondents i(though isufficient) imay ireduce ithe ivalidity iof ithe iresults
The iinformation iis isubjectively iself-reported
The iresearch iis ilimited ito iInstagram iReels iand iYouTube iShorts, iand inot iother ishort ivideo iplatforms
Ethical
iConsiderations
Ethical
iguidelines iwere iobserved iduring ithis istudy:
Free iand iinformed iconsent iwas isought ito itake ithe isurvey
Participants iwere igiven iinformation iabout ithe iresearch
Participants iwere iassured iof iconfidentiality iand ianonymity
Data
iwas ianalysed ionly ifor iacademic iresearch
Summary
Page 2300
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
A idescriptive iresearch idesign iwas iadopted ito iexamine ithe ieffect iof iInstagram iReels iand iYouTube ishorts ion
i
brand iengagement iamong iGen iZ iconsumers iin ithis istudy. iPrimary idata i(questionnaires) iand isecondary idata
i(literature iand ireports) iwere iused. iThe istudy isubjects iwere i300 iparticipants ichosen ithrough iconvenience
isampling. iData iwere igenerated iand icompiled iusing istatistical itechniques, isuch ias ithe ifrequency iand
ipercentage ianalysis, ito iunderstand ithe itrends iof iengagement iand ipurchasing imetrics.
RESULTS
iAND iDISCUSSION
Demographic
iProfile
Demographic iVariable
Category
Frequency
Percent
Age iGroup iof iRespondents
1719 iyears
68
22.7%
2022 iyears
92
30.7%
2324 iyears
63
21.0%
2526 iyears
77
25.7%
Total
300
100%
Gender iof iRespondents
Male
182
60.7%
Female
118
39.3%
Total
300
100%
Interpretation
The
idemographic idata ipresented iin ithe itable ihighlights ithe idistribution iof irespondents. iIt ishows ithat ithe
imajority iof irespondents ibelong ito ithe i2022 iyears iage igroup i(30.7%), ifollowed iby i2526 iyears i(25.7%)
iand i1719 iyears i(22.7%), iwhile i2324 iyears i(21%) irepresents ithe ismallest igroup.
In irelation ito ithe igender iprofile iof ithe irespondents, i60.7% iof ithe isamples iare imales iand i39.3% iare ifemales.
iThis ishows ithe isurvey iprimarily iinvolves iyoung icollege istudents iwith ia isomewhat igreater iproportion iof
i
males.
Section
iB: iSocial iMedia iUsage i
Variable
Category
Percent
Daily iTime iSpent ion iSocial iMedia
Less ithan i1 ihour
26.3%
12 ihours
27.0%
34 ihours
28.0%
More ithan i4 ihours
18.7%
Total
100%
Preferred iPlatform ifor iShort iVideos
Instagram iReels
40.0%
YouTube iShorts
14.7%
Both iequally
35.7%
None
9.7%
Total
100%
Frequency iof iWatching iBrand-Related iShort iVideos
Very ioften
30.3%
Often
24.0%
Sometimes
19.3%
Rarely
12.7%
Never
13.7%
Total
100%
Interpretation
The
iabove itable ishows ithe isurvey iparticipants' isocial imedia iusage. iThis ireveals ithat ithe imajority iof
irespondents i(28%) ispend i3-4 ihours ia iday ion isocial imedia, ifollowed iby i1-2 ihours i(27%) iand iless ithan i1
Page 2301
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
ihour i(26.3%) iwhile i18.7% ispend imore ithan i4 ihours. iThis ishows ithe istudents ispend ia iconsiderable itime ion
i
social imedia.
When iit icomes ito ithe ipreferred iplatforms ito iview ishort ivideos, imost irespondents i(40%) iprefer iInstagram
iReels ifollowed iby iboth i(35.7%) iand ionly iYouTube iShorts i(14.7%). iOnly i9.7% isaid ithey idon't iuse ithem ifor
ishort ivideos.
When iit icomes ito ishort ivideos iby ibrands, i30.3% iof irespondents iwatch ithem ivery ioften, i24% ioften iand
i19.3% isometimes. iFewer iwatch ithem irarely i(12.7%) ior inever i(13.7%). iIt iimplies ia ihigh idegree iof istudent
iexposure ito ibrand-related icontent ivia ishort-form ivideos ion isocial imedia.
Section
iC: iBrand iUsage
Variable
Category
Frequency
Percent
Short iVideos iHelp iDiscover iNew iBrands
Strongly iAgree
100
33.3%
Agree
72
24.0%
Neutral
69
23.0%
Disagree
37
12.3%
Strongly
i
Disagree
22
7.3%
Total
300
100%
Like ior iReact ito iBrand iVideos ion iReels ior iShorts
Strongly iAgree
82
27.3%
Agree
71
23.7%
Neutral
100
33.3%
Disagree
26
8.7%
Strongly
i
Disagree
21
7.0%
Total
300
100%
Share iBrand iRelated iShort iVideos iwith iFriends
Strongly iAgree
67
22.3%
Agree
98
32.7%
Neutral
92
30.7%
Disagree
21
7.0%
Strongly
i
Disagree
22
7.3%
Total
300
100%
Short iVideos iMake iBrands iMore iInteresting iand
i
Engaging
Strongly iAgree
93
31.0%
Agree
99
33.0%
Neutral
70
23.3%
Disagree
19
6.3%
Strongly
i
Disagree
19
6.3%
Total
300
100%
Interpretation
The
iabove itable ishows istudents' iattitudes itowards iinteracting iwith ibrands ithrough ishort ivideos. iBased ion ithe
iresponses, i33.3% istrongly iagree iand i24% iagree ithat ithey ihave ifound ibrands ithey ididn't iknow ithrough ishort
ivideos, isuggesting ithat ishort ivideo icontent iis ieffective iin ibrand iawareness ifor istudents.
In
iterms iof iengagement iwith ibrand, i27.3% istrongly iagree iand i23.7% iagree ithat ithey ilike ior ireact ito ibrand
ivideos ion ishort ivideo iplatforms, iwith i33.3% ineutral iand ithus imoderate iengagement.
Page 2302
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
In iterms iof ipassing ion ithe iword iabout ia ibrand, i32.7% iagree iand i22.3% istrongly iagree ithat ithey ishare ithese
i
videos iwith itheir ifriends, iindicating ithat ishort ivideos ican istimulate isharing ibehaviour.
And i33% iagree iand i31% istrongly iagree ithat ithey ifind ibrands imore iinteresting iand iengaging iwhen ithey iuse
ishort ivideo iformats. iThis imeans ithat ishort ivideos ihelp imake ibrands imore iinteresting iand iengaging ifor iGen
iZ iconsumers.
Section
iD: iPlatform iFeatures
Variable
Category
Frequency
Percent
Instagram iReels iProvides iMore iEngaging iBrand iContent
Strongly iAgree
61
20.3%
Agree
66
22.0%
Neutral
97
32.3%
Disagree
44
14.7%
Strongly
i
Disagree
32
10.7%
Total
300
100%
YouTube iShorts iKeep iViewers iWatching iUntil iEnd
Strongly iAgree
89
29.7%
Agree
90
30.0%
Neutral
58
19.3%
Disagree
33
11.0%
Strongly
iDisagree
30
10.0%
Total
300
100%
Recommendation iAlgorithm iHelps iDiscover iBrand iVideos
Strongly iAgree
94
31.3%
Agree
80
26.7%
Neutral
66
22.0%
Disagree
28
9.3%
Strongly
i
Disagree
32
10.7%
Total
300
100%
Interpretation
The
iabove iresults irepresent irespondents' iperspectives iof ithe ifeatures iof ishort-form ivideo iplatforms. iIt ishows
i32.3% iare iundecided iabout iwhether iInstagram iReels ioffers imore ibrand icontent ithan iother isocial imedia
iplatforms iwith i22% iagree iand i20.3% istrongly iagree, ishowing ithat ia ilarge ipart iof ithe iusers ifind iInstagram
iReels ibrand icontent iengaging.
In iterms iof iYouTube iShorts, i30% iagree iand i29.7% istrongly iagree ithat ithe ivideos ikeep iviewers iwatching
iuntil ithe iend. iThis isuggests ithat iYouTube iShorts isuccessfully ikeeps iusers iengaged iwith ithe ivideo.
And i31.3% istrongly iagree iand i26.7% iagree ithat ithey ifind ibrand ivideos ivia ithe irecommender isystem. iThis
i
indicates ithat irecommendations iusing ialgorithms iare ialso iimportant iin idiscovering inew ibrand-related ivideos
ion ishort ivideos.
Section
iE: iBrand iPerception
Variable
Category
Frequency
Percent
Brand iVideos iAppear iAuthentic iand iTrustworthy
Strongly iAgree
91
30.3%
Agree
78
26.0%
Neutral
75
25.0%
Disagree
27
9.0%
Strongly iDisagree
29
9.7%
Total
300
100%
Interpretation
Page 2303
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
The iabove itable ishows ithat ipeople's iviews ion ithe iauthenticity iand icredibility iof icontent ion ibrand ishort-
videos
iplatforms. iThe ifindings isuggest ithat i30.3% istrongly iagree iand i26% iagree ithat ibrand ivideos iare
iauthentic iand itrustworthy. iHowever, i25% iare ineutral, iperhaps ireflecting isome iuncertainty iabout ibrand
ivideos' iauthenticity iand itrustworthiness.
A iminority iof isurvey iparticipants i(9% idisagree iand i9.7% istrongly idisagree) ithink ithat ibrand ivideos iare inot
iauthentic. iOverall, ithis idata ishows ithat imost irespondents isee ithe ivalue iin ibrand iauthenticity ion ishort ivideo
iapps, iwhich ican itranslate iinto ibetter ibrand iengagement ifor iGen iZ iusers.
Section
iF: iPurchase iIntention
Variable
Category
Frequency
Percent
Short iVideo iAds iInfluence iProduct iTrial iDecision
Strongly iAgree
85
28.3%
Agree
86
28.7%
Neutral
74
24.7%
Disagree
31
10.3%
Strongly iDisagree
24
8.0%
Total
300
100%
Likelihood iof iPurchase iAfter iWatching iShort iVideo iAds
Strongly iAgree
74
24.7%
Agree
84
28.0%
Neutral
71
23.7%
Disagree
40
13.3%
Strongly iDisagree
31
10.3%
Total
300
100%
Interpretation
The
itable iabove irepresent irespondents' iviews ion ibrand ipurchase ibehaviours ithrough ivideo iadvertisements.
iThe ifindings ishow ithat i28.7% iof irespondents iagree iand i28.3% istrongly iagree ithat ithey irespond ito ipurchase
iintention iregarding ia iproduct iwhen ithey iwatch ia ishort ivideo iadvertisement. iHowever, i24.7% iof ithem ifeel
ineutral iabout ithis iwhile ithe iremainder ido inot iagree.
In iterms iof ithe iinfluence iof ishort ivideo iadvertisements ion itheir iintention ito ibuy ia iproduct, i28% iagree iand
i24.7% istrongly iagree ithat ithey iare imore ilikely ito ibuy ithe iproduct. iBut i23.7% iare iundecided iand ia ifew
idisagree.
On ithe iwhole, ithe iresearch ishows ithat iGen iZ iconsumers' ipurchasing iintentions iare ihighly iinfluenced iby
ishort ivideo iadvertisements ibut isome iusers iare istill inot isure iif ithey iwill imake ia ipurchase idecision ijust
ibecause iof ia ishort ivideo iadvertisement.
Hypothesis
i1
Page 2304
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
RESULT
The
iChi-Square itest ishows ia iPearson iChi-Square ivalue iof i19.312 iwith ia isignificance ivalue i(p) iof i0.025.
iSince ithe ip-value i(0.025) iis iless ithan i0.05, ithe inull ihypothesis iis irejected.
Interpretation:
This iresult iindicates ithat ithere iis ia isignificant irelationship ibetween idiscovering inew ibrands iand iliking ior
ireacting ito ibrand ivideos. iIn isimple iterms, irespondents iwho idiscover inew ibrands ithrough ishort ivideos iare
ialso imore ilikely ito iinteract iwith ithose ibrand ivideos iby iliking ior ireacting ito ithem.
Hypothesis
i2
Result:The iChi-Square ianalysis ishows ia iPearson iChi-Square ivalue iof i11.791 iwith ia isignificance ivalue i(p)
i
of i0.015. iSince ithe ip-value i(0.015) iis iless ithan i0.05, ithe inull ihypothesis iis irejected.
Interpretation:This
imeans ithat ithere iis ia isignificant irelationship ibetween ibrand iengagement iand ipurchase
i
intention. iIt isuggests ithat iwhen iusers ifind ibrand ivideos iinteresting iand iengaging, ithey iare imore ilikely ito
iconsider ipurchasing ithe iproduct iafter iwatching ishort-form ivideo iadvertisements.
Hypothesis
i3
Result
The iANOVA itest ishows ian iF ivalue iof i0.862 iwith ia isignificance ivalue i(p) iof i0.048. iSince ithe ip-value
i(0.048) iis iless ithan i0.05, ithe inull ihypothesis iis irejected.
Interpretation
This iresult iindicates ithat ithe ipreferred ishort-video iplatform ihas ia isignificant ieffect ion ihow iusers iperceive
ithe iengagement ilevel iof iInstagram iReels ibrand icontent. iIn iother iwords, iusers iwho iprefer idifferent iplatforms
imay ihave idifferent iopinions iabout ihow iengaging iInstagram iReels ibrand ivideos iare.
Page 2305
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
Hypothesis i4
Result:The
iSpearman icorrelation ianalysis ishows ia icorrelation icoefficient iof i0.025 iwith ia isignificance ivalue
i(p) iof i0.006. iSince ithe ip-value i(0.006) iis iless ithan i0.05, ithe inull ihypothesis iis irejected.
Interpretation:This iindicates ithat ithere iis ia isignificant irelationship ibetween irecommendation ialgorithms iand
i
product itrial idecisions. iThis imeans ithat iwhen irecommendation ialgorithms ihelp iusers idiscover irelevant ibrand
ivideos, iit ican iinfluence itheir idecision ito itry ior iconsider ipurchasing ithe iproduct.
DISCUSSION
According
ito ithe isocio-demographic iprofile, ithe irespondents iare iyoung iwith imajority iof ithem iin ithe iage
igroup i2022 i(the iremaining iare i25-26 iyears iold). iThis isuggests ithat ithe istudy iis ifocused ion ithe iGen iZ
ionline iusers. iWe ialso ihave imore imale irespondents ithan ifemale irespondents. iOverall ithe isample iis
irepresentative iof ithe icollege iyouth iwho iare imore ilikely ito iuse isocial imedia iand iother idigital icontent
iregularly.
The istudy ishows ithat ithe isocial imedia iuse iby irespondents iis icomparatively ihigh ias irespondents ispend ian
iaverage iof i3-4 ihours iper iday iusing isocial imedia. iThis ishows ithe ivery ihigh iuse iof isocial imedia. iInstagram
iReels iis ithe imost ipreferred iamongst ithe iplatforms ifor iwatching ishort ivideos, ibut imany ialso iwatch ivideos
i
on iInstagram iReels ias iwell ias iYouTube iShorts. iSo, iYouTube iand iother ishort ivideo iplatforms iare ione iof
ithe ilargest isources iof ientertainment iand iinformation ifor iyoung ipeople.
When iit icomes ito icontent ipreferences, ia imajority iof ithe isurvey iparticipants isaid ithat ithey iview ishort ibrand
ivideos ioften. iMany iof ithem iconsume isuch iclips ieither ifrequently ior iregularly, iwhich isuggests ithat ibrands
iare isuccessful iin ireaching itheir itarget iaudience iusing ithese iplatforms. iThis ialso isuggests ithat ishort ivideos
iare ian ieffective iway ito ipromote ibrands iand iincrease ibrand iawareness iamong iyoung iconsumers.
The ibrand iengagement iresults ishow ithat isuch iuse iof ishort ivideos iis iimportant iin ihelping iusers ito idiscover
inew ibrands. iThe iusers iindicated itheir iperception ithat imany iengage iwith ibrands iby iliking, ireacting iand
isharing ithe icontent. iHowever, isome isubstantial iportion iof ithe irespondents iwas ineutral iin ithis iregard, iwhich
isuggests ithat iwhile ithey iare iengaged, inot ithe isame iacross iall iusers. iHowever, ithe ioverall itrend isuggests
ithat ithe ishort ivideos imake ithe ibrands imore iattractive.
Page 2306
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
As ifor ifeatures, ithe iaudience iof iInstagram iReels ihas ibeen idivided, ias isome iusers iwere iindifferent ito itheir
i
engagement ilevel. iHowever, iYouTube iShorts iwas ifound ito ibe imore ieffective iat ikeeping ithe iaudience
iengaged iin ithe ivideo. iAlso, ialgorithms iplay ia isignificant irole ito ihelp iusers ifind inew ibrand-related icontent.
iThis ishows ithe iinfluence iof itechnology iand ipersonalisation ion ithe iuser's ibehaviour ion isocial imedia
iplatforms.
The istudy ishows ia ipositive iview ion ithe iauthenticity iof ithe ibrands ias imost iof ithe irespondents iperceive
ibrand ivideos ion ishort-form isites ito ibe iauthentic iand icredible. iHowever, ithere iare ialso iusers iwho iare inot
iso icertain iwhich imeans ithat ibrands ishould ifocus imore ion iestablishing ibrand icredibility. iThis iincludes itrust
ias iit iis ia ifactor ithat iaffects ithe iuser's iattitude itowards ithe ibrands iand ithe ipurchase iintention.
Finishing, ithe istudy ishows ithat ishort ivideo iads iare ieffective iin icreating ipurchase iintentions. iMany iof ithe
irespondents iagreed ithat ithey iare iencouraged ito ipurchase ior iadopt iproducts ifollowing isuch ia ivideo. iThis iis
ialso iproved iin ithe istatistical ianalysis iwhich ireveals ithere iis ia icorrelation ibetween ibrand iawareness, iinterest
i
and ithe ipurchase iintention. iOverall, ias idiscussed iabove, ithe ishort-form ivideo iservices ilike iInstagram iReels
iand iYouTube iShorts iare isuccessful iat imarketing ibrands, ias ithey imanage ito ibuild ibrand iawareness iand ihave
ithe ipotential ito iinfluence iconsumer ibehaviour iand ipurchase iintention iof ithe iGen iZ iaudience.
CONCLUSION
The study shows that there is a growth of the importance of short-form video services in terms of brand
engagement among Gen Z users. The findings suggest that a lot of young people spend several hours per day
on social media platforms and view short videos on platforms such as Instagram Reels and YouTube Shorts.
These platforms help the consumers discover brands more conveniently and interact with the brand through
liking, sharing and commenting reactions with videos. The study results also reveal that the use of short videos
enables brands to increase the level of interest, attractiveness and engagingness and visual appeal.
However, the results also show that the purchase intention of Gen Z can be influenced by the advertisement
through short videos. The majority of respondents agreed that they get intrigued with the brand after watching
a brand-specific video. It is also confirmed in the hypothesis testing that brand discovery and engagement with
brand content is related to purchase intention. Overall, the study suggests that such businesses and marketers
should consider creating innovative and genuine short video content that will target Gen Z and help to increase
brand awareness and interest with the social media platform.
REFERENCES
1. Chawla, Y. (2025). How Reels (short-form content) are reshaping brand communication strategies.
International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 7(5).
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i05.56130
2. Fatimah, A. E., & Nasir, M. (2025). Utilization of short-form videos (TikTok, Reels, Shorts) to increase
brand engagement and visibility. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship and Organization.
https://doi.org/10.59261/jseo.v2i1.7
3. Rahman, R. T. (2025). Reel advertising: Its effect on brand perception and product selection.
International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering and Management, 12(3).
https://doi.org/10.55524/ijirem.2025.12.3.5
4. Youn, S., Shah, P., & Dodoo, N. A. (2024). Engaging with branded content on short-video sharing apps:
How motivations affect attitude toward branded content, brand experience, and relationship quality.
Journal of Interactive Advertising. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2024.2325410
5. Violot, C., Elmas, T., & Bilogrevic, I. (2024). Shorts vs. regular videos on YouTube: A comparative
analysis of user engagement and content creation trends. arXiv.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3614419.3644023
6. Lee, J. W., & Soo, S. (2024). A study of Instagram Reels exploring the interplay of user motivations,
attitudes, and continuance intentions in short-form video content. Journal of Media and Web Studies.
https://doi.org/10.53935/jomw.v2024i4.556
Page 2307
www.rsisinternational.org
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY IN ENGINEERING,
MANAGEMENT & APPLIED SCIENCE (IJLTEMAS)
ISSN 2278-2540 | DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS | Volume XV, Issue VI, June 2026
7. Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2025). Technology affordances, social media engagement, and social
media addiction: An investigation of TikTok, Instagram Reels, and YouTube Shorts. Cyberpsychology,
Behavior, and Social Networking. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2024.0338
8. Ayo, E. B., Tamayo, J. D., & Tegio, R. G. (2025). Short-form video consumption among Gen Z:
Perceived academic impact and pedagogical potential. International Journal of Multidisciplinary
Research.
9. Rajendran, P. T., Creusy, K., & Garnes, V. (2024). Shorts on the rise: Assessing the effects of YouTube
Shorts on long-form video content. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2402.18208
10. Islam, M. M., & Kabir, M. A. (2025). The impact of short video content and social media influencers on
digital marketing success: A systematic literature review of smartphone usage. Journal of Marketing and
Web Technologies. https://doi.org/10.70937/faet.v1i02.46
11. Kannan, S., & Anuradha, M. (2024). Students' engagement with social media reels: Scope for news
outlets. ShodhKosh Journal of Visual and Performing Arts.
https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v5.i1.2024.561
12. Bi, R., Feng, Y., & Ma, J. (2023). The influence of short videos on Gen Z’ purchasing behavior.
Communications in Humanities Research. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/19/20231207
13. Doloi, G. (2024). The influence of Instagram Reels on content consumption trends among Gen Z. Journal
of Social Responsibility, Tourism and Hospitality. https://doi.org/10.55529/jsrth.46.21.31
14. Wolfe, J. (2022). Getting a feel of Instagram Reels: The effects of posting format on online engagement.
Journal of Student Research. https://doi.org/10.47611/jsrhs.v11i4.3600
15. Lin, Q. (2023). The influence of short video content on the consumption behavior of Gen Z. EAI
Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.2-12-2022.2332276